Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

As Many States Roll Back Abortion Access, New York's Governor Wants To Protect It

$
0
0
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has proposed a constitutional amendment that would codify Roe v. Wade into the state’s constitution, regardless of what happens to the ruling at the federal level.

“As Washington seeks to limit women’s rights, we seek to protect them,” Cuomo told a crowd of more than 1,500 reproductive rights activists gathered in Albany on Monday for a Planned Parenthood rally.

The measure faces an uphill battle. It will now go to the state senate, which has previously blocked efforts to expand New York’s abortion laws. The New York Daily News reports that the earliest it could appear on a ballot is 2019. 

Cuomo’s announcement came one day before President Donald Trump is expected to announce his nominee for the Supreme Court, filling the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Trump has said that he will appoint a “pro-life” justice. During his campaign, he also said that if more seats open up during his presidency, Roe v. Wade would likely be overturned. 

Anti-abortion legislators emboldened by that kind of rhetoric have begun to further chip away at abortion access at the state level. Since the start of their new legislative sessions, states like Kentucky hav proposed a 20-week abortion ban, while Arkansas has banned a common abortion procedure for women in their second trimester.

But reproductive rights advocates say they are reassured by the pushback they see coming from other areas of the country, such as New York.

“I would say that there is no question that things feel pretty bleak,” Andrea Miller, president of the National Institute for Reproductive Health, an advocacy group that works to promote and expand reproductive healthcare access, told the told The Huffington Post.

“The damage that’s already been done in just a few short days is deeply troubling,” she continued, “and yet I am inspired and awed by the temerity and the passion we have seen in states even before this election.” 

According to the group, advocates and lawmakers advanced 191 bills aimed at expanding reproductive healthcare in 2016, several focused on abortion specifically. Massachusetts, for example, passed a law requiring that confidential information about a patient be sent to them directly, not the insurance policy holder. That means a college student who is still on her parents’ health insurance plan would not have information about her abortion sent to them. Likewise, a victim of domestic violence would not have to worry that private health information is being sent to her partner.

Yet year after year, the number of states considered hostile to abortion continues to grow. In 2000, roughly 30 percent of reproductive-age women a lived in a state the Guttmacher Institute ― a reproductive health research and policy group  ― considered hostile to abortion rights. By 2014, nearly 60 percent did. 

“The sad fact is that today, whether you have both the right and access to comprehensive health care really does depend on your zip code, your income and your insurance coverage,” Miller said. “It’s not an understatement that for many women, in many states, Roe v. Wade is a hollow promise at best.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 3 hours ago.

Repealing Obamacare Could Make It Tougher To Find A Job, New Report Says

$
0
0
Republicans have long insisted that repealing the Affordable Care Act will create jobs.

A new report out Tuesday suggests that the Republicans have it wrong ― that, if anything, repeal will cause more joblessness, at least of the involuntary kind.

Like all such reports, this one reflects assumptions that critics will question. But the finding is consistent with other recent studies challenging the conservative arguments about repeal.

It also jibes with some pretty standard theories about how the economy works.

From the day Obamacare became law, back in 2010, Republicans have been saying that it would muck up the economy with taxes that sap people’s will to work and regulations that hamstring corporations from expanding.

Get rid of the law, they predicted, and the economy would pick up new steam ― creating growth and, as a result, more jobs.

Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, studied the law and came to a very different conclusion: Repeal could actually slow down the economy, so that by 2019 the number of jobs would be almost 1.2 million lower than it would be if the law had remained in place.

That’s a big number, and depends on a bunch of assumptions (about the state of the labor force today and the actual provisions of a repeal bill, among other things) that are simultaneously debatable and defensible.

But what matters isn’t the magnitude of Obamacare’s effect on the workforce. It’s the direction ― the idea that repeal could actually make it harder for people who want work to find jobs.

And the EPI report makes a solid case.

Repeal would eliminate the new taxes that the Affordable Care Act imposed, and, all else equal, eliminating taxes is bound to boost growth ― because, crudely speaking, it means people have more money to spend.


The spending cuts in repeal would be bigger than the tax cuts.

But repeal would also eliminate the program’s new spending, on newly expanded Medicaid programs and tax credits for people buying private insurance on their own. Those types of spending cuts would reduce growth, because they would leave people with less money to spend.

In other words, the effect of cutting the health care law’s taxes and cutting its spending would push in opposite directions.

But they wouldn’t push with equal force. For one thing, if repeal keeps the reduction in Medicare payments to hospitals and other parts of the health care industry that are part of the law ― as Republicans have indicated they are inclined to do ― then the spending cuts in repeal would be bigger than the tax cuts. In 2019, the year EPI chose as its focus, repeal would mean $109 billion in less spending, compared with just $70 billion in lower taxes.

In addition, the tax and spending cuts would affect different populations. Affordable Care Act taxes fall exclusively on corporations and the wealthiest Americans. When wealthy Americans have more money in their pockets, they tend to save it rather than spend it, and in the short term that doesn’t do much for job growth.

By contrast, the health care law’s spending raises incomes for low- and middle-income people ― what economists call “cash-constrained households.” Take away that money, and the folks who live paycheck to paycheck would have to cut back on spending quickly ― by holding off on car repairs, for example, or stretching grocery dollars even farther.

Either way, it’d be less money flowing into the economy right away, and that would mean less job growth.

EPI’s report doesn’t address the economic impact of the law’s regulations, which conservatives maintain has a wholly separate ― and negative ― effect on the economy. But that claim is as subject to dispute as the rest of the conservative case against the law.

As Politico health care writer Dan Diamond has pointed out repeatedly, private sector employment has risen every single month since March 2010, when President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law. Meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act has made it easier for aspiring entrepreneurs to leave large companies and start their own businesses, since the self-employed no longer have to worry about insurers denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.To be clear, none of this is to say the health care law has created an economy with more jobs on net. In 2014, the Congressional Budget Office predicted that the health care law would reduce the supply of labor, and thus the total number of jobs in the workforce. Republicans and economists like Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director who is president of the American Action Forum, pounced on that finding as proof that the health care law really is a job-killer.

But the job loss CBO predicted was largely a matter of voluntary unemployment ― people giving up full-time jobs in order to work fewer hours, or retire early, because they no longer needed that full-time position to get health benefits.

As Bivens told The Huffington Post, “I think [EPI’s] number matters more because it’s a measure of involuntary job-loss ― jobs reduced because there is deficient aggregate demand, which means more people looking for jobs than are jobs available. The CBO numbers on labor force reductions due to the ACA are voluntary changes ― people chose less work because the inefficient job/health-insurance link was usefully loosened by the ACA.”

One way this might be playing out is by helping parents spend more time with their kids. Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, has long argued that parents opting out of full-time jobs in order to take family-friendly, part-time positions is one of the most underappreciated stories of the health care law.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 2 hours ago.

Sources: Aetna exploring significant office presence in Boston

$
0
0
Health insurance giant Aetna Inc. has engaged a real estate brokerage firm and is in the early stages of exploring whether to establish a significant office presence in Boston, according to multiple sources. Last year, documents obtained from the city of Boston showed that Aetna (NYSE: AET) was being courted to leave its longtime Connecticut home by a number of cities, including Boston. In the year since, and as recently as this week, Aetna has denied it's planning any type of headquarters relocation. “We… Reported by bizjournals 1 hour ago.

The end of Obamacare's open enrollment comes amid big questions about its future

$
0
0
The end of Obamacare's open enrollment comes amid big questions about its future Tuesday marks the final day of open enrollment on the Affordable Care Act's exchanges.

Facing down the possibility of repeal, Americans can still sign up for health insurance coverage for 2017 through the end of the day. But the uncertainty facing the law known as Obamacare may already be affecting the number of people signing up.

President Donald Trump's administration has ceased nearly all communications and outreach trying to get Americans to enroll — which may cause big problems in the health insurance market.

*Uncertainty abounds*

The last few weeks of enrollment are particularly important — not only is there an uptick in overall sign ups, but a higher percentage of young people typically sign up.

Younger enrollees are needed to help adjust the risk pool in the individual market. With too few young people, the risk pool becomes older, sicker, and more expensive to cover for insurers.

In years past, this has led to large losses for insurers on exchange-based plans, as well as questions over the long-term sustainability of the exchanges.

Yet the Trump administration yanked roughly $5 million in advertising focused on getting people to sign up. Additionally, communication from the Department of Health and Human Services, which runs the exchanges, has decreased significantly since Trump's inauguration.

It also appears that Trump and the GOP's desire to move forward with a repeal and replacement of the law may have put a drag on the last few weeks of enrollment. Before going radio silent, HHS reported that it was dealing with a heavier number of calls than usual from people asking if they should still sign up for care.

"Strong demand is especially striking in light of the unique headwinds created by discouraging rhetoric from ACA opponents," former HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell said in a statement right before Trump's inauguration. "More than 40,000 people have contacted our call center expressing concerns about whether they should sign up for coverage, with a sharp uptick in these questions last weekend."

The Washington Post has reported that the grassroots organization Enroll America — which aims to sign up as many people for plans through the ACA as possible — has had 30% fewer appointments to assist in sign-ups than during the 2015-16 enrollment period.

The increased uncertainty and possibility of a drop in young enrollees has insurers worried. The possibility of facing an even more expensive risk pool, instead of steady or improving enrollment as HHS had predicted before the open enrollment period, could cause insurers already worried about the exchanges' uncertain future to leave them preemptively.

Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini, who runs one of the nation's five largest public insurers, said during a quarterly earnings call on Tuesday that due to the uncertainty, the company has no plans to expand the number of states where it offers ACA plans.

"We have no intention of being in the market for 2018. Currently where we stand, we'd have to markets worked up prices worked up for April 2017 to apply, and there is no possible way that we'll be able to do that given the unclear nature that regulation is headed," Bertolini said. "We will, however, participate where we think it is appropriate in 2018 as we currently evaluate our performance in helping support the transition to whatever comes forward in 2019 or 2020."

Advocates for the ACA and health-policy experts say the steps by Trump and the GOP's insistence on a repeal will help create the "death spiral" that Republicans claimed was happening — except this time, the GOP would be in line for the blame.

Even former Vice President Joe Biden dared Republicans to repeal the law, warning: "Go ahead repeal it. Repeal it now, see what happens."

*A Republican replacement*

While open enrollment wraps up, Republicans have been moving forward with the repeal of the law and attempting to craft a replacement for the ACA.

Several GOP lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, have issued plans for replacements. But a cohesive replacement supported by the wider Republican leadership, however, has not been advanced.

And GOP members of the House and Senate passed a budget resolution that directed committee leaders to draft a repeal bill using the budget reconciliation. Once drafted, the repeal bill would only allow parts of the law regarding the budget to be repealed

Republicans have exhibited some trepidation about repealing Obamacare without a full replacement bill ready. Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have all expressed the desire to replace the ACA as close to a repeal as possible.

Despite assurances from Trump that the new GOP plan will eventually cover every American at a lower cost and with better coverage, it appears that the new administration may already be causing some worrying problems in the individual insurance market already.

All of the upheaval comes at a time when the ACA has never been more popular. Recent polls from NBC News/The Wall Street Journal and Morning Consult/Politico showed the highest level of approval for the law among Americans since its passage.

In fact, both polls show more Americans in support of Obamacare than against it.

*SEE ALSO: Trump made a move that could help wreck Obamacare*

*SEE ALSO: This is what could happen if Obamacare is repealed*

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here are all the musicians who declined to perform at Trump's inauguration so far Reported by Business Insider 32 minutes ago.

For Rhode Island, Interstate Health Insurance Sales Didn't Pan Out

$
0
0
President Trump and Republican lawmakers say that letting insurers sell health plans across state lines would save money. But when Rhode Island tried it, the results weren't encouraging. Reported by NPR 43 minutes ago.

State health care enrollments rise despite possible ACA repeal

$
0
0
The New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange reported an uptick in health insurance enrollments as of Jan. 22 while a possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act looms. beWellnm reported that 52,062 individuals enrolled from Nov. 1, 2016 through Jan. 22. That signals a 72 percent re-enrollment rate and a 4 percent year-over-year rise, beWellnm reported. Jan. 31 was the final day of the open enrollment period. As of last October, 82 percent of New Mexicans had health insurance, the Business First previously… Reported by bizjournals 19 minutes ago.

Obamacare signups end tonight: Tell us your health insurance story

$
0
0
Reported by DallasNews 1 minute ago.

For Rhode Island, Interstate Health Insurance Sales Didn't Pan Out

$
0
0
President Trump and Republican lawmakers say that letting insurers sell health plans across state lines would save money. But when Rhode Island tried it, the results weren't encouraging. Reported by NPR 21 hours ago.

State health care enrollments rise despite possible ACA repeal

$
0
0
The New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange reported an uptick in health insurance enrollments as of Jan. 22 while a possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act looms. beWellnm reported that 52,062 individuals enrolled from Nov. 1, 2016 through Jan. 22. That signals a 72 percent re-enrollment rate and a 4 percent year-over-year rise, beWellnm reported. Jan. 31 was the final day of the open enrollment period. As of last October, 82 percent of New Mexicans had health insurance, the Business First previously… Reported by bizjournals 21 hours ago.

Zenefits scores Lyft, Box as partners despite terrible 2016

$
0
0
HR startup Zenefits on Tuesday updated its platform, adding nine partners and several features as it tries to come back from a disastrous 2016. Last year, Zenefits paid millions of dollars in settlement fines after violating state laws by allowing unlicensed employees to sell health insurance. The biggest fine came out of a settlement with the California Department of Insurance at $7 million. It also parted company with its original CEO and co-founder, Parker Conrad. The company is now seeking… Reported by bizjournals 22 hours ago.

Obamacare signups end tonight: Tell us your health insurance story

$
0
0
Reported by DallasNews 22 hours ago.

Signs Suggest Trump Budget Will Feature Unprecedented Cuts Plus Large Tax Cuts Favoring Wealthy

$
0
0
Mounting signs suggest that the forthcoming Trump budget may contain cuts harsher than those in House GOP budgets of recent years, which themselves would have slashed programs and services across much of the budget.The budget that the Republican majority on the House Budget Committee approved last spring, for example, contained a stunning $6 trillion in domestic cuts over ten years, shrinking spending outside Social Security, Medicare, and interest payments to just 7 percent of gross domestic product by 2026.  That's less than three-fifths its average level over the past 40 years and little more than half its average level under President Reagan.  The budget would have slashed non-defense discretionary programs (which include everything outside defense and entitlement programs) by roughly $1 trillion over ten years below the already austere levels set by the 2011 Budget Control Act (BCA) and the automatic "sequestration" cuts. [Last spring's Republican budget] would have caused tens of millions of people to lose basic support, yet those unprecedented cuts may not be enough for the Trump Administration. And it would have cut programs for people with low or modest incomes by roughly $3.7 trillion over the decade, cutting them 42 percent by 2026 and thereby causing tens of millions of people of limited means to lose basic support.^[1]Yet those unprecedented cuts may not be enough for the Trump Administration.  The Hill reported recently that members of the Trump team were meeting with career staff at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to assemble a budget with $10 trillion or more in savings (including interest savings), of which about $8½ trillion would apparently be cuts to programs outside defense (the rest would be interest savings).  Many of the cuts in the Trump team's blueprint come from plans that the Heritage Foundation and the Republican Study Committee (RSC) issued last year, according to The Hill.  The Heritage report called for more than $8½ trillion in non-defense cuts (slightly over $10 trillion in savings when the effects on interest payments are taken into account; see box), while the RSC report called for almost $7½ trillion in such cuts. Moreover, the "Penny Plan" that President Trump proposed during his campaign would slash non-defense discretionary funding by 2026 to an amount 37 percent below the 2010 level, adjusted for inflation, and nearly 40 percent below its lowest level under Ronald Reagan, when measured as a share of the economy.^[2]  Rep. Mick Mulvaney, Trump's nominee for OMB director, supports the Penny Plan.^[3]Cuts of these magnitudes would have devastating effects on tens of millions of less fortunate families and on an array of basic services that middle-income Americans, as well, rely on.  State and local governments, too, would be sharply affected, since a large share of federal domestic programs operate as grants to states and localities, which deliver basic services such as education, highways and mass transit, child nutrition, rental subsidies, clean water, and health care through Medicaid.These budget cuts would apparently come alongside deep tax cuts heavily favoring the most well-off.  The House GOP's "Better Way" tax plan issued last year, which the Trump team is reportedly moving toward, would lose $3.1 trillion in revenue over the coming decade, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC).^[4]  In the first year, 76 percent of these tax cuts would go to the top 1 percent of Americans; by the tenth year, 99 percent of the tax cuts would.  Trump proposed an even larger, regressive tax cut in his campaign.As a result, the forthcoming Trump budget is likely to represent the largest Robin Hood-in-reverse proposal from any President in modern U.S. history, shifting substantial amounts of income from people of modest means to those who already possess enormous wealth. 

Heritage Blueprint Severely Cuts Non-Defense ProgramsThe Heritage Foundation's "Blueprint for Reform,"* which Trump staff are reportedly using as a basis for the Trump budget, would:

· *Cut Medicaid and other mandatory (entitlement) programs outside Social Security and Medicare by $3.8 trillion over the decade, relative to the Congressional Budget Office baseline, and by 35 percent in 2026.*  The cuts would largely come in programs serving the most vulnerable Americans.  The plan would repeal the Affordable Care Act and provide only a limited replacement, dramatically curtail Medicaid for seniors and non-disabled adults, eliminate Supplemental Security Income (SSI) cash benefits for poor children with disabilities, and cut the SNAP (food stamp) program, among others.  Millions of people would lose health insurance, and poor families with a disabled child would experience more hardship.

 

&nbs;&nbs;

 *Cut Medicare by $1.7 trillion over the decade and by almost one-third in 2026.*  The plan would raise the Medicare eligibility age, increase premiums, and replace Medicare's guaranteed benefit with premium support (a flat payment or voucher), among other changes.
*Cut non-defense discretionary programs by $2.5 trillion over the decade, slashing this spending by one-third next year and in half in 2026.*  The plan would eliminate large chunks of departments (sometimes by shifting their responsibilities to the states but without accompanying funding) and undermine federal responsibilities in areas ranging from rural development and transportation infrastructure to energy research, environmental protection, pre-school education, and low-income housing.  These cuts would come on top of the cuts imposed by the BCA, which already are pushing these programs to their lowest level on record as a percent of the economy, with data back to 1962.

The plan would also cut Social Security by $633 billion over the decade.  Indeed, more than one-quarter of the plan's savings would come from Social Security and Medicare.  Of course, President Trump has said that he would protect Social Security and Medicare.  But doing so and still achieving roughly $10 trillion in total savings would require even more draconian cuts across the rest of the budget.

* "Blueprint for Reform: A Comprehensive Policy Agenda for a New Administration in 2017," Heritage Foundation, July 14, 2016, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2016/07/blueprint-for-reform.  The Heritage blueprint was constructed from the Congressional Budget Office baseline of March 2016; for consistency, our calculations of the resulting cuts are relative to that baseline.

This post originally appeared on Off the Charts, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' blog

More on this Topic:

House GOP Budget Gets 62 Percent of Budget Cuts From Low- and Moderate-Income Programs

Trump "Penny Plan" Would Mean Large Cut in Non-Defense Spending

House GOP "A Better Way" Tax Cuts Would Overwhelmingly Benefit Top 1 Percent While Sharply Expanding Deficits

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 21 hours ago.

HUFFPOST HILL - Can Merrick Garland Borrow Your Therapy Dog

$
0
0
*Like what you read below? **Sign up for HUFFPOST HILL** and get a cheeky dose of political news every evening! *

Democrats finally closed ranks against President Trump, spending political capital they had been saving for bunk assignments in Eric Trump’s Center for Re-Education and Tying Pastel Sweaters Around Your Shoulder. A report out of Florida indicates our cybersecurity issues go well past John Podesta’s inability to discern who is or isn’t a Nigerian prince. And thirteen D.C. public schools canceled outdoor activities due to a loose bobcat, recalling that time the city’s children had to shelter in place due to the fake weed zombie swarm. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Tuesday, January 31st, 2017:

*SCOTUS TIME -  *Lawrence Hurley: “Trump said on Monday he would reveal his choice to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016, at the White House at 8 p.m. on Tuesday…. [The leading candidates are]:* Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; Thomas Hardiman, who serves on the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; and William Pryor, a judge on the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals*…. Gorsuch, 49, joined an opinion in 2013 saying that owners of private companies can object on religious grounds to a provision of the Obamacare health insurance law requiring employers to provide coverage for birth control for women. Hardiman, 51, has embraced a broad interpretation of the constitutional guarantee of the right to bear arms and has backed the right of schools to restrict student speech. Pryor, 54, has been an outspoken critic of the court’s 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion, calling it ‘the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history.’ Conservatives are hoping the high court will back restrictions imposed on the procedure by some Republican-governed states.” [Reuters]

*SEAN SPICER IS TRAPPED IN AN ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP - *This was a dumpster fire’s dumpster fire, y’know? Christina Wilkie: “*White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer repeatedly denied on Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s executive order barring travelers from certain countries was in fact a ‘ban,’* although the president and Spicer himself called it just that on Monday. Since Trump signed the executive order on Friday, ‘1 million people have come into this country. That’s not a ban,’ a testy Spicer insisted at the White House daily press briefing. ‘A ban would mean people can’t get in, and we’ve clearly seen hundreds of thousands of people come into our country from other countries.’ Spicer’s decision to litigate the meaning of a term both he and the president had employed just hours earlier underscores their contradictory attempts to claim credit for keeping a campaign promise while countering critics who say it violates the American ideal of religious pluralism by unjustly targeting Muslims.” [HuffPost]

*DEMS PROTEST HHS AND TREASURY CONFIRMATIONS - *Amanda Terkel and Sam Stein: “Senate Democrats deployed a dramatic eleventh-hour maneuver to deny committee votes to two of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks Tuesday, arguing that those nominees had lied to them. *Senators on the Finance Committee were set to vote on Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) to lead the Department of Health and Human Services and Steve Mnuchin to lead the Treasury Department. But on Tuesday morning, they simply didn’t show up for the votes*, denying Republicans the quorum they needed to move forward toward confirmation. At least one Democrat needs to be present for the vote to happen...Lawmakers felt the two nominees had misled them at various points in the confirmation process and were looking for a leverage point to get additional explanations. On Tuesday morning, the aides said, committee Democrats met in Wyden’s office and agreed to go forward with the plan shortly before the hearing was set to begin. “ [HuffPost] 

@BresPolitico: Tom Price was trying to avoid press, ran to Senate subway. But then subway BROKE DOWN & he was stuck facing reporter questions 

*SESSIONS VOTE PUT OFF AS DEMS CRITICIZE YATES FIRING *- Ryan J. Reilly: “Senate Democrats on Tuesday delayed the confirmation of Alabama Sen. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III to be the next attorney general of the United States, just hours after President Donald Trump fired the acting attorney general for defying his administration. *The Senate Judiciary Committee was expected to advance Sessions’ nomination to the full Senate on Tuesday. But Democrats on the committee, starting at 9:30 a.m*., spoke at length about their opposition to Sessions and their admiration for former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who was fired by Trump late Monday night. The committee vote on Sessions will now be held Wednesday.” [HuffPost] 

*Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s book*, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

 Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to eliot@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter - @HuffPostHill

 *CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS KIND OF WORRIED ABOUT WHERE THEY FIT IN WITH THE WHOLE AUTHORITARIAN THING *- A lack of regular order will be the least of their concerns when Arbor Day is rechristened, “My, What Big Hands You Have, Mr. President” Day. Laura Barron-Lopez: “Congress may need to take action to curtail President Donald Trump’s executive order blocking all refugees and specific foreign nationals if lawmakers don’t start getting answers, a number of Senate Republicans said on Monday.* Not a single Senate Republican out of the 10 that The Huffington Post talked to had been consulted before Trump signed the order Friday afternoon. *The White House did not release the final text until 2½ hours later, and even then left major issues unclear, such as whether legal permanent residents, also called green card holders, should be subject to the ban. As a result, many people who live in the U.S. returning from travel were detained in airports across the country. On Sunday, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly announced that green card holders can be admitted case by case.” [HuffPost]

 *THIS LITERALLY IS WHAT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ IS ABOUT -* Abigail Hauslohner and Janell Ross: “*The Trump administration is considering a plan to weed out would-be immigrants who are likely to require public assistance, as well as to deport — when possible — immigrants already living in the United States who depend on taxpayer help*, according to a draft executive order obtained by The Washington Post. A second draft order under consideration calls for a substantial shake-up in the system through which the United States administers immigrant and nonimmigrant visas, with the aim of tightly controlling who enters the country and who can enter the workforce, and to reduce the social-services burden on U.S. taxpayers.” [WaPo]

 *LOL, NO ONE CARES ABOUT PLAGIARISM ANYMORE* - But, still, check this out! Laura Barron-Lopez: “*Betsy DeVos appears to have copied lines from statutes and other sources in her written answers submitted to a Senate committee, according to a copy of the document and a review of those other sources. *The lifting of passages was first reported by The Washington Post, though The Huffington Post had been alerted to these instances by sources opposing her nomination. It could cloud DeVos’ nomination, though Republican senators have stood by her even after what was widely considered a shaky committee hearing. In her submitted responses to Democrats on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, DeVos did not cite or footnote the phrases or sentences that, at times, she copied verbatim.” [HuffPost]

 ****Nothing matters alert*** DeVos’ was cleared by the HELP Committee*: “The vote was split along party lines, with all 11 Democrats on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee voting to reject DeVos, and all 12 of the committee’s Republicans voting to approve her. Next, DeVos faces a full Senate vote. Two Republican senators on the HELP Committee, Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), suggested that they were not sure how they would vote at that point.” [HuffPost’s Rebecca Klein] 

*THE KKK ET AL ARE SUPER HAPPY WITH TRUMP *- We spent a lot of time scouring American Renaissance so you don’t have to: Eliot Nelson: “A wide range of fringe figures in the public sphere and on the web ― including white nationalists, anti-Semites, so-called “men’s rights activists” and others with discriminatory views ― have acclaimed Trump’s first week in office, focusing in particular on his executive actions ordering the construction of a border wall with Mexico and banning refugees from entering the country…. *The subject of another popular Reddit post predicted approvingly that the administration’s actions presaged a democratic decline. It **was titled** ‘I get the feeling that Trump deep down is planning on going full fash,’ meaning fascist. *On the white supremacist message board Stormfront, users expressed support for Trump’s proposed border wall, with many offering suggestions on how it should be built. ‘I too like the idea of a minefield,’ wrote user AryanWarrior. ‘Drones, helicopters, guard towers, starving dogs who love dark meat, all the bells & whistles :)’” [HuffPost]

*CONGRESSIONAL PHONES OVERLOADED -* Pity the 22-year-old staff assistant who has been eating yogurt for lunch at his desk since January 20th. Elise Viebeck: “When you call the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which has primary responsibility for any investigations in Congress related to President Trump, you get voicemail. Here’s what it says: ‘If you would like to provide information or make an inquiry relating to President Donald Trump, please press 1.’ If you press 1, this is the message you receive: ‘Because of high call volume, we are unable to answer your call at this time.’ … *Across the Hill, the problem is so bad that administrative officials are trying to increase the capacity of the phone lines to allow more calls to get through*. ‘For now, callers should wait a little while and try again if they want to complete the call,’ Dan Weiser, communications director for the House’s Chief Administrative Officer, wrote in an email. “ [WaPo] 

*America is broken,* and The Times is ON IT! “President Trump made clear in his fiery inaugural speech that he was going to challenge the Washington establishment. Now the establishment is quickly pushing back, creating a palpable air of uncertainty and chaos in the opening days of his administration…. Even after years of unbreakable gridlock and unyielding partisanship, it was a jarring new level of confrontation and conflict, and it was contributing to a building sense of crisis just as the new president was to disclose the identity of a new Supreme Court nominee — a selection certain to further inflame tensions.” [NYT’s Carl Hulse]
*‘PALESTINIAN SALAD’ - *Desmond Butler and Richard Lardner: “A critical national security program known as ‘WebOps’ is part of a vast psychological operation that the Pentagon says is effectively countering an enemy that has used the internet as a devastating tool of propaganda. But an Associated Press investigation found the management behind WebOps is *so beset with incompetence, cronyism and flawed data that multiple people with direct knowledge of the program say it’s having little impact. *Several current and former WebOps employees cited multiple examples of civilian Arabic specialists who have little experience in counter-propaganda, cannot speak Arabic fluently and have so little understanding of Islam they are no match for the Islamic State online recruiters. It’s hard to establish rapport with a potential terror recruit when — as one former worker told the AP — *translators repeatedly mix up the Arabic words for ‘salad’ and ‘authority.’ *That’s led to open ridicule on social media about references to the ‘Palestinian salad.’” [AP]

*Oh*: “A flare-up in fighting in eastern Ukraine over the weekend has raised new uncertainty about how the White House’s new occupants feel about the conflict, given President Donald Trump’s desire for closer relations with Russia.” [BuzzFeed’s Hayes Brown] 

In case you were wondering what George W. Bush is up to, he’s sitting for Plainview High School documentaries about his dog, Barney. 

*WE CAN ONLY HOPE ONE OF THEM GAVE TRUMP SOME XANAX -* Anna Edney and Justin Sink: “*President Donald Trump told drugmakers at a White House meeting Tuesday they were charging too much* and promised to get better bargains for government health programs, in addition to finding ways to get new medicines to market faster…. It’s not clear how much support Trump has from key Republicans for the harshest drug price policies, which have typically been opposed by conservatives.” [Bloomberg] 

*BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR *- Here’s a very friendly bear.

*BOBCAT UPDATE - *If we cower in fear from Ollie the D.C. bobcat, then fascism’s victory is all but assured. Andrew Beaujon: “*Ollie the bobcat is still missing from Smithsonian’s National Zoo. *In a news release, the zoo says it has received tips from neighbors that suggest the 25-pound cat may be in the Woodley Park or Cleveland Park neighborhoods of Northwest DC. It deployed a search party that includes zookeepers, zoo cops, and members of the DC Humane Rescue Alliance early Tuesday morning. While Ollie is at large, 13 DC public schools have gone on alert status, ‘which includes moving activities indoors.’” [Washingtonian] 

*COMFORT FOOD* 

- Taking a crack at Dry January. 

- Fun facts about each of the 50 states. 

- Even snooker commentators have catchphrases. 

*TWITTERAMA*

@mattyglesias:

R

EMAILS

F

U

G

EMAILS

EMAILS 

@morninggloria: don’t you hate it when you bite the inside of your mouth, and then you keep biting the same spot and also all hope has died

 @igorbobic: Trump will make his final decision by locking both SCOTUS candidates in a room with the bobcat. Two men enter. One survives. 

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 21 hours ago.

Colorado’s health insurance exchange extends deadline to enroll, amid surge in sign-ups

$
0
0
Connect for Health Colorado, the state's Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplace, is extending the deadline for people to sign up for coverage this year. Reported by Denver Post 20 hours ago.

Hawaii measures aim to save 'best parts' of Obamacare

$
0
0
In a modest church building in urban Honolulu, mother Mona Aliksa waited to sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, President Barack Obama's signature health care law. Reported by FOXNews.com 17 hours ago.

Daniel Cottrell Joins IHC Specialty Benefits as Senior Vice President

$
0
0
The IHC Group announced today the appointment of Daniel Cottrell as Senior Vice President of National Accounts for IHC Specialty Benefits, a subsidiary of the IHC Group.

New York, NY (PRWEB) February 01, 2017

The IHC Group (IHC) announced today the appointment of Daniel Cottrell as Senior Vice President of National Accounts for IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc., a member of The IHC Group.

Mr. Cottrell has more than 20 years of experience in the healthcare industry, most recently serving as Vice President for Cigna Payer Solutions where he managed national level Payer relationships. Additionally, Mr. Cottrell also previously held key roles with Willis, Inc. & BlueCross BlueShield of TN.

In his new role, Mr. Cottrell brings a track record of successfully growing profitable books of specialty health business. Mr. Cottrell will be primarily responsible for developing strategies to support the continued growth of IHC's Specialty Benefits division through strategic partnerships that will expand the distribution of IHC’s specialty health products for employer groups and individuals.

“Daniel is a valuable addition to our management team as we continue to adjust to an ever changing healthcare environment,” said Dave Keller, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer for IHC Specialty Benefits. “We believe that we are ideally situated to benefit from the anticipated changes in the health insurance marketplace. We have an industry leading suite of voluntary products, and the knowledge and relationships that Daniel brings to our organization will be a catalyst to continuing the exceptional growth that IHC has experienced in the specialty health market over the past three years.”

Mr. Cottrell, who will report to Mr. Keller, attended California University of Pennsylvania and currently resides in Collierville, Tenn.

For more information on IHC Specialty Benefits, please contact Dave Keller at 952-746-6610 or email at dave(dot)keller(at)IHCGroup(dot)com.

About The IHC Group
Independence Holding Company (NYSE: IHC) is a holding company that is principally engaged in underwriting, administering and/or distributing group and individual specialty benefit products, including disability, supplemental health, pet, and group life insurance through its subsidiaries since 1980. The IHC Group owns three insurance companies (Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York, Madison National Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Independence American Insurance Company), and IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc., a technology-driven insurance sales and marketing company that creates value for insurance producers, carriers and consumers (both individuals and small businesses) through a suite of proprietary tools and products (including ACA plans and small group medical stop-loss). All products are placed with highly rated carriers. Reported by PRWeb 15 hours ago.

PharmacyChecker.com Adds Patient Assistance Program Information, Expanding Options for Americans Struggling to Afford Medication

$
0
0
PharmacyChecker.com adds information on no-cost and low-cost patient assistance programs offered by drug companies to eligible patients in the U.S.

White Plains, NY (PRWEB) February 01, 2017

Expanding on its mission to help Americans safely access affordable medication, PharmacyChecker.com announced today that it has added patient assistance program (PAP) information to its popular website.

Patient assistance programs provide medication at no cost, very low cost, or at significant savings to patients. They are sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, but PharmacyChecker.com has no affiliation with pharmaceutical companies and derives no revenue from use of the PAP information, which is provided for free to its website’s visitors, like all information on PharmacyChecker.com.

Tod Cooperman, M.D., CEO of PharmacyChecker.com noted, “These patient assistance programs are not ideal, as they tend to exclude people earning over $36,000 per year, but they can help some people access exceedingly high-priced ‘specialty medication.’ We want visitors to PharmacyChecker.com to see all their options when it comes to saving money on medication.”

Specialty medications have increased threefold in price since 2003 and are cost prohibitive for almost all patients without health insurance. Examples include Humira (adalimumab), which costs about $5000 per month and is used for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis; Sovaldi (sofosbuvir), which costs over $84,000 for a typical three-month treatment and treats Hepatitis C; and Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate), which costs almost $7,000 per month and treats multiple sclerosis. Prices noted are out-of-pocket costs.

PharmacyChecker.com, founded in 2002, is the leading website for comparing prices of medications available online from licensed pharmacies around the world, ones that are verified and monitored in its Verification Program. Reported by PRWeb 15 hours ago.

New 2016 ez1095 ACA Software From Halfpricesoft.com Offers Batch Form Printing

$
0
0
ez1095 2016 software provides new features such as batch form printing for quicker processing. Visit http://www.halfpricesoft.com to test drive for up to 30 days.

Pittsburgh, PA (PRWEB) February 01, 2017

http:// ez10952016 (Affordable Care Act) software from Halfpricesoft.com has been updated to accommodate mid to large size establishments in batch form printing for quicker processing. The latest release offers single and multi user versions, printing and efile options and easy instructions for rolling forward from last year data to this year for current customers.

“ez1095 2016 ACA form reporting software now offers batch 1095 form printing per customer suggestions,” said Dr. Ge, the founder of Halfpricesoft.com.

Ez1095 can support 1095C, 1094C, 1095B and 1094B forms paper printing, pdf printing and efiling for the upcoming tax season. The application has been implemented and approved by the SSA to print on plain white paper, saving form costs. Its quick data import feature saves customers valuable time and speeds up tax form filing.

Ez1095 ACA software is compatible with Windows 10, 8.1, 8, 7, Vista and other Windows system. Customers can run this desktop ACA software offline to protect employee data.

ez1095 software has been created and released to follow the requirements set by the government to file forms 1094 and 1095 starting in 2016. ez1095 software’s graphical interface accommodates customers in company setup, adding employees, adding forms and printing forms immediately after download. Customers can also click form level help links to get more details regarding the software.

Download and try it at no cost or obligation at http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/aca-1095-software.asp

Features include but are not limited to the following:· Support unlimited companies.
· Support unlimited number of recipients.
· Fast data import feature
· Print ACA forms 1095 and 1094 on blank paper with inkjet or laser printer.
· Print unlimited number of 1095 and 1094 forms.
· Print Form 1095 C: Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Insurance
· Print Form 1094 C: Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns
· Print Form 1095-B: Health Coverage
· Print Form 1094-B: Transmittal of Health Coverage Information Return
· Print recipient copies in PDF format.
· Efile is available for $295 for faster filing options

Priced at just $195, ($295 for efile version) this ACA forms filing software saves employers time and money. To learn more about ez1095 ACA software, customers can visit http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/aca-1095-software.asp

About halfpricesoft.com

Founded in 2003, Halfpricesoft.com has established itself as a leader in meeting the software needs of small businesses around the world with its payroll software, employee attendance tracking software, check printing software, W2 software, 1099 software and barcode generating software. It continues to grow with its philosophy that small business owners need affordable, user friendly, super simple, and totally risk-free software. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

Keep Your Religion Out Of Our Bedrooms

$
0
0
Donald Trump and the religious wrong are poised to overturn reproductive freedom in the United States and in the world if they can. In one of his first actions as President, Trump signed an executive order barring federal funds going to any organization that promotes, provides, or even informs women about the possibility of an abortion anywhere in the world. Before nominating U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court, Trump preened "evangelicals, Christians will love my pick."

There is little respect in this administration for Constitutional principles starting with an immigration ban that targeted Muslims. Republicans must decide if they will put the Trump agenda ahead of respect for Constitutional rights and the future of the country.

Gorsuch claims to believe Supreme Court Justices must respect the original intent of the founding fathers. He should read the Constitution. Perhaps he could read it to Donald Trump.

The principles that protect religious freedom and reproductive choices are deeply imbedded in the fundamental law of the United States. The 1st amendment opens stating, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The fourth declares "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated." The ninth amendment makes clear that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people," rights such as the right to privacy and personal choice. This is reinforced by the 10th amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." And because states initially believed they were not bound by these legal principles, the fourteenth amendment made clear " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."

This is simply a nomination, as Trump made clear, to appease rightwing religious voters who overwhelmingly supported his election. Trump's claim that the Supreme Court should overturn Roe v. Wade and allow individual states to ban abortion and reproductive freedom is a direct violation of these Constitutional provisions. Nowhere is that power delegated to the national government or reserved to the states. It is a choice that belongs to individual people.

As a judge, Gorsuch has never ruled directly on an abortion rights case, which will make it possible for him to sidestep direct questions in his Senate confirmation hearings, one reason he was nominated by Trump. But he has ruled that businesses are not required to provide health insurance coverage for birth control for their employees if they claim it violates their religious beliefs.

Opposition to reproductive freedom is at the core of the Trump Presidency. Last week Vice-President Pence became the first President or Vice-President to speak at the annual anti-choice anti-women rally in Washington DC. Pence declared, "life is winning" and assured the crowd that Trump shared their opposition to abortion and would appoint a Supreme Court Justice committed to overturning abortion rights. Of course pro-life Pence advocates the death penalty. Trump spokesperson Kellyanne Conway also spoke at the rally.

On the Trump team Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions calls Roe. v. Wade "one of the worst, colossally erroneous Supreme Court decisions of all time." As a Congressman, Tom Price, nominated as Secretary of Health and Human Services, championed defunding Planned Parenthood. Trump's pick for Secretary of Labor advocates legally defining the start of human life as conception as a way to outlaw abortion as murder. But Trump supporters do not just oppose abortion. A major part of the Republican opposition to the Affordable Care Act was because of provisions providing birth control.

What they try to hide is that their opposition to reproductive freedom, abortion, birth control, sex education, and human sexuality, is based on their religious beliefs and texts. It is an attempt to impose them on the rest of the country and the world. When human life begins and should be protected by law has never been established scientifically, probably never can be definitively, and is a religious point of view.

*These are some of the scientific facts that complicate the situation and expose their efforts to impose their religious beliefs on everyone else.*

1. Women are born with between one and two million egg follicles in their ovaries. About eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty. At puberty, about 400,000 remain viable. Another thousand egg follicles are lost every menstruation cycle. Of the approximately two million original "potential humans" in each woman's body, only 400 ever mature. The rest are aborted through natural processes. If each of these egg follicles possesses a human soul, human's evolved as a genocide machine.

2. The average human male produces over 500 billion sperm cells during his lifetime and releases between 40 million and 1.2 billion in a single ejaculation. When a sperm cell succeeds in fertilizing an egg cell, as many as a billion other potential human being sperm cells are discarded, aborted through natural processes. If you believe sperm cells possess souls, on the male side the "genocide" is many times worse than for females.

3. Scientists estimate that more than 50% of all fertilized eggs either never implant in the uterus or fail to develop. Most miscarriages occur in the first trimester, a large number in the first weeks of pregnancy, often before a woman even knows she is pregnant. If anything, nature votes in favor of abortion.

Many of the religious believers who oppose abortion also oppose birth control and sex. In the Roman Catholic Church masturbation, when an individual deliberately stimulates their genital organs in order to derive sexual pleasure, is considered a grave sin. And since the Church blames women for the first sin in the Garden of Eden, women are forced to suffer the discomfort of menstruation and the pain of childbirth. They are also expected to be subservient to men.

*The American people need to tell Donald Trump and the United States Senate:

"Obey the Constitution!"

"Refuse to approve Gorsuch!"

"Keep Your Religion Out Of Our Bedrooms!"*

*Follow Alan Singer on Twitter:* https://twitter.com/ReecesPieces8

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

Petplan Launches Healthy Kisses Campaign during National Pet Dental Health Month

$
0
0
Pet insurance provider educates pet parents about the need for proper oral care and insurance

Newtown Square, PA (PRWEB) February 01, 2017

Petplan pet insurance is taking a bite out of National Pet Dental Health Month this February by launching the Healthy Kisses Campaign, an awareness effort aimed at educating pet parents about the importance of good oral health, proper dental care and comprehensive dental insurance.

Petplan is introducing the annual initiative to remind pet parents that during this month of love, more than just kisses matter.

The elements of the Healthy Kisses campaign include:· An online information center that serves as a one-stop source for in-depth pet dental health information
· Dedicated emails to Petplan policyholders and prospects with tips and tricks for keeping teeth clean
· A “virtual kissing booth” on Petplan’s social media pages that will encourage pet parents to engage with the educational content and take an active role in their pet’s oral health

“Dental health is too important to the overall wellbeing of your pet to ignore,” says Elyse Cannon, Petplan’s Veterinary Manager. “That’s why Petplan took great care in ensuring comprehensive coverage for dental injuries and disease when designing our policy. Many pet parents don’t realize how critical taking care of your pet’s teeth is, but good oral health can add two to five years to a pet’s life. We’re committed to getting the word out via our Healthy Kisses Campaign.”

Studies estimate that 85% of all pets have signs of periodontal disease by the time they're three years old. In fact, periodontal disease is Petplan’s fourth most claimed for condition — and the average cost per claim is $846. Other common conditions and their average costs include: fractured/broken tooth ($1,081), tooth extraction ($756) and gingivitis ($646).*

“Veterinarians always talk to clients about maintaining the dental health of their furry friends, especially in February during National Pet Dental Health Month. The problem is, the need for dental insurance is rarely part of that conversation,” says Petplan Veterinary Advisory Board member Dr. Ernie Ward. “Petplan’s Healthy Kisses Campaign is the perfect opportunity for both veterinarians and pet parents to start a dialogue. Having pet health insurance that covers dental injuries and illness can make a huge difference in a patient’s life — and on their owner’s wallet.”

To learn more about keeping pets’ pearly whites healthy, and how Petplan can help, please visit Petplan.com.

*According to 2015 Petplan claims data.

ABOUT PETPLAN

Petplan has built the industry’s leading pet insurance for pet parents who demand a higher pedigree of care for their best friends. We’ve leveraged 40 years of global experience to create completely customizable coverage pet parents can feel confident in, and world-class claims service that’s second to none — 24 hours a day, every day.

Petplan’s innovative approach to pet insurance has been recognized by Forbes, Financial Times, Bloomberg, Inc. magazine, Smart CEO, the Communicator Awards, Ernst & Young and many others.

Petplan policies are underwritten in the U.S. by XL Specialty Insurance Company, and in Canada by XL Specialty Insurance Company – Canadian Branch. The company is rated A+ by S&P. Coverage may not be available in all jurisdictions. For more information about Petplan pet insurance, visit http://www.gopetplan.com or call 1-866-467-3875. Reported by PRWeb 9 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images