Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Healthcare Center Gets the PENETRON Treatment

$
0
0
The newly opened UniMed Belo Horizonte healthcare center counted on PENETRON crystalline technology to make sure the facility’s underground structures would be impermeable and durable.

East Setauket, New York (PRWEB) January 30, 2017

The newly opened UniMed Belo Horizonte healthcare center counted on PENETRON crystalline technology to make sure the facility’s underground structures would be impermeable and durable.

“Confronted with the relatively high water table of the UniMed construction site and the humid climate of Belo Horizonte, the project engineers quickly realized our crystalline products were the perfect solution,” says Cláudio Neves Ourives, General Manager of PENETRON Brazil.

UniMed, a Brazilian medical service cooperative and health insurance operator is the largest of its kind in the world, with 367 local member cooperatives. To expand its Belo Horizonte operations, UniMed invested R$250 million/US$125 million in the construction of three new large outpatient units, including a hospital to accommodate 300 doctors and a medical research facility.

Construction of the three new buildings was done by Racional Engenharia (Rational Engineering), an engineering and construction services company. During the first phase, the concrete for all three foundation slabs was poured. Next, the concrete retaining walls of the below-ground structures went up; all concrete was treated with PENETRON ADMIX during the batching phase. PENECRETE MORTAR, a topical repair compound, was also applied to fill and seal any cracks in the concrete that occurred in the final phase.

In total, about 10,000 m3 of concrete were treated with PENETRON ADMIX to ensure resistance to the hydrostatic pressure of the groundwater present at the construction site. The resulting construction joints were sealed with about 300 meters of PENEBAR SW-55 swellable-type waterstop.

“For the above-ground concrete structures exposed to the elements, such as the parking garage ramps, PENESEAL PRO was sprayed directly on the surfaces to protect the concrete against any environmental impact,” adds Cláudio Neves Ourives.

PENESEAL PRO is a spray-on liquid sealer that is ideal for waterproofing and protecting exposed concrete surfaces, forming a gel that compensates for the movement of cracks due to thermal expansion and contraction. PENESEAL PRO reacts with the concrete to form a sub-surface barrier that protects against water penetration and seal hairline cracks, pores and capillaries. It remains active inside the concrete and continues to seal any new cracks due to settlement, thermal stress or external action.

“Our crystalline admixture will provide permanent protection against the hydrostatic pressure of the groundwater,” explains Jozef Van Beeck, Director, International Sales & Marketing of PENETRON International. “Once construction was completed and inspected, the contractor was thoroughly pleased with the results.”

The PENETRON Group is a leading manufacturer of specialty construction products for concrete waterproofing, concrete repairs and floor preparation systems. The Group operates through a global network, offering support to the design and construction community through its regional offices, representatives and distribution channels.

For more information on PENETRON waterproofing solutions, please visit penetron(dot)com or Facebook(dot)com/ThePenetronGroup, email CRDept(at)penetron(dot)com, or contact the Corporate Relations Department at 631-941-9700. Reported by PRWeb 11 hours ago.

United States: Employment And Benefits Advisory: 2017 - Sullivan & Worcester LLP

$
0
0
As mentioned in prior advisories, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Treasury have taken the position that employers cannot reimburse employees for the cost of individual health insurance policies (whether on a pre-tax or after-tax basis). Reported by Mondaq 7 hours ago.

Ask Carrie: Worried About Your Wallet? Here's How to Protect Your Finances in Uncertain Times

$
0
0
Dear Carrie,

I can't help but feel worried about the coming year and how all the political changes may affect my finances. I don't have a lot of money, but I want to be smart about handling and protecting what I do have. Is there anything specific I can do? --A Reader

Dear Reader,

I'm getting a lot of questions from readers who are understandably apprehensive about what's in store for their money in the coming year. So much is up in the air: taxes, interest rates, health care choices and costs, the future of Medicare and Social Security. All of these things have the potential to impact the economy, the financial markets--and our wallets.

But here's some good news. Although we can't predict or control the future, we can prepare ourselves by sticking to some time-tested basics of money management. After all, even though we may not be aware of it, we all live with uncertainty every day. Always have, always will.

The best way I know to feel more in control is to take action. So here are some thoughts on things you can do to help ease your anxiety. Even as market forces change, these principles hold true. In fact, it's in times of uncertainty that they're probably the most valuable of all.

*Don't overreact*
Regardless of what's happening in government or politics, don't panic. Think back to the dramatic market decline of 2008. It was an extraordinarily stressful time, but the investors who suffered long-term were those who panicked and sold at a low.

So don't let your emotions lead you astray. Instead, let your situation, your personality, and your goals be your guide--and choose your investments accordingly. Money that you know you'll need in the next three to five years shouldn't be in the stock market. And if you're close to retirement, make sure you have a healthy cash cushion.

*Cover these basics*
The unknown is always a little scary but there are some basic things you do have control over no matter where the political or economic winds blow. Here are three practical ways to protect yourself:
· *Beef up your emergency fund.* Everyone should have an emergency fund to cover at least three to six months of necessary spending. But if you're feeling uncertain about the future, and especially if you're nearing retirement, you may want to increase your cash reserves even more.
· *Reduce your debt.* An industry rule of thumb is that no more than 28 percent of your pretax income should go toward home mortgage debt, and no more than 36 percent should go toward all debt. However, in uncertain times, it may be wise to stay well below these levels. Certainly if you're carrying credit card or other expensive, nondeductible debt month to month, make a plan to pay it off as soon as possible.
· *Be well insured.* Insurance always seems like a colossal waste of money--until you need it. If you don't have great health insurance, get it now. Ditto on auto, disability, and homeowner's insurance, and possibly life or long-term-care insurance, depending on your situation. At the same time, be cautious about falling for sales pitches for products you don't need (e.g., life insurance for a child).
*Rebalance your portfolio*
Periodic rebalancing is always important--but it's probably even more crucial when markets adjust. This is because as "winning" investments gain in value and take up a larger portion of your portfolio, other investments shrink in comparison. This will change your asset allocation, potentially exposing you to increased risk.

One way to compensate is to sell a percentage of the asset classes that have performed well and use that money to buy more of the asset classes that have done poorly. This way, you're not only taking profits, you're actually buying low and selling high. Alternatively, if you're adding money to your portfolio, you can invest in categories that have underperformed. Sounds counter-intuitive--but rebalancing is a cornerstone of smart investing.

*Make a plan*
Numerous studies have shown that planners prevail. They set goals, establish priorities, and obtain more wealth. To me, this just makes sense. Managing your money is too important to leave to chance.

If you've never worked with a financial planner, this could be your year. A financial plan can be a great way to organize your finances and make sure all the pieces are working together. Or if you're not ready to go the formalized route, at a minimum take a hard look at your goals (Retirement? A new home? College?), and then crunch the numbers to make sure you're on the right path.

Change can be disconcerting but it can also mean new opportunities. Yes, there are unknowns ahead. But if you're smart and diligent, you'll not only be able to roll with the punches and protect your money, you'll be able to help it grow.

*For more updates, follow Carrie on LinkedIn and Twitter.*

Looking for answers to your retirement questions? Check out Carrie's book, "The Charles Schwab Guide to Finances After Fifty: Answers to Your Most Important Money Questions."

This article originally appeared on Schwab.com. You can e-mail Carrie at askcarrie@schwab.com, or click here for additional Ask Carrie columns. This column is no substitute for an individualized recommendation, tax, legal or personalized investment advice. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, consult with a qualified tax advisor, CPA, financial planner or investment manager.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. (MEMBER SIPC.) (#0117-TJHK)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 3 hours ago.

Celebrities Want You To Know The Obamacare Enrollment Deadline Is Jan. 31

$
0
0
It’s been a tumultuous few days for the Affordable Care Act. Last week, the Trump administration ordered staffers at the Department of Health and Human Services to cease all outreach efforts for the program ― despite it being open to enrollment through the end of January ― and then reversed that order.

Given the confusion coming from President Donald Trump, celebrities and advocates have taken to social media to spread the message that the deadline to register for the ACA, aka Obamacare, is Tuesday, Jan. 31. 

(See the video above for the difference between the ACA and Obamacare.)

Comedian and actor Colton Dunn made several advertisements of his own, the first of which went out on Friday. He’s posted one homemade ad every day since:


Some POS pulled all the ads so i made my own. Sign up for #Heathcare today! Deadline Jan 31st https://t.co/nvZGIFqGba #PullThisAd pic.twitter.com/U0N5uDCsZF

— colton dunn (@captdope) January 27, 2017



Dumb dumbs tried to pull ads. We stopped them! 3 more days! Go to https://t.co/OvjKSszcrF before January 31st! Tell yo friends! #PullThisAd pic.twitter.com/Ithl5pTDWq

— colton dunn (@captdope) January 28, 2017



They out here banning peeps, we out here getting healthcare. 2 more days! Go get it! https://t.co/OvjKSshBA7 #pullthisad #NoBanNoWall LA2NYC pic.twitter.com/mR4gmfe3lR

— colton dunn (@captdope) January 29, 2017



No gimmicks. One more day. https://t.co/HsKbuEt8Te. #ACA #PullThisAd #Love pic.twitter.com/GzfWN2BoSP

— colton dunn (@captdope) January 30, 2017


Actress and writer Lena Dunham followed Dunn’s lead with a less-clothed iteration.


Inspired by @captdope, here's a commercial for HEALTH INSURANCE. https://t.co/e8KpWkyQz1- get what's yours #pullthisad pic.twitter.com/LcJP9GdnbU

— Lena Dunham (@lenadunham) January 28, 2017


Director Ava DuVernay also sent out a message of her own.


Lots going on. Don't forget self-care. The deadline for open enrollment is January 31. Go to @HealthCareGov for info on how to #GetCovered. pic.twitter.com/nMaaYX7SQB

— Ava DuVernay (@ava) January 29, 2017


Comedian Billy Eichner took to the streets with actress Olivia Wilde in a healthcare-centered video for Funny or Die.


.@OliviaWilde & @BillyEichner play a game about Obamacare. Last chance to enroll is January 31! Do it here: https://t.co/F5bjAmxHgQ pic.twitter.com/YM5y9W6XgQ

— Funny Or Die (@funnyordie) January 28, 2017


Singer John Legend and actor Nathan Fillion told their followers where they could sign up, too.


If you want and need to sign up for the insurance exchanges, do so before Jan 31. You'll be covered for the year. Tell a friend. https://t.co/CMUMO33xNN

— John Legend (@johnlegend) January 27, 2017



Sign up for Health insurance today at https://t.co/6WeMhjB9ZY! Deadline January 31st! #PullThisAd

— Nathan Fillion (@NathanFillion) January 28, 2017


Politicians also joined in.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and more reminded their constituents to #GetCovered.


.@POTUS doesn’t want you to know that you can STILL #GetCovered under #ACA before the Jan 31 deadline. → https://t.co/OtDYU03tRz

— Nancy Pelosi (@NancyPelosi) January 27, 2017



So much for 'insurance for everybody'. @POTUS is sabotaging #ACA; doesn't want you to #GetCovered before 1/31. → https://t.co/Acq7ugT6BH

— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) January 27, 2017



Trump admin may not want you to know this, but Jan. 31st is the deadline to enroll in the #ACA for 2017. #GetCovered https://t.co/rJyLTZEisH

— Kirsten Gillibrand (@SenGillibrand) January 27, 2017



WH may not want you to know how to get #ACA coverage before open enrollment ends 1/31, but I do! #GetCovered today https://t.co/XeJlWb9BXB

— Senator Tim Kaine (@timkaine) January 27, 2017


If you want to sign up for the ACA (aka Obamacare), you can do so on HealthCare.gov.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 3 hours ago.

Fifth Harmony's Lauren Jauregui Exhorts Fans To Take Action Against Immigration Ban

$
0
0
Fifth Harmony member Lauren Jauregui is not taking President Trump’s immigration ban lying down.

The 20-year-old Cuban-American singer composed an open letter to her fans and followers, begging them to take action against Trump’s executive order. Trump’s order temporarily stops the U.S. refugee resettlement program and bans immigration from Syria and a handful of other predominantly Muslim countries.

“We cannot afford woke tweets and Instagram posts alone,” Jauregui wrote. “If you are going to these protests, if you need health insurance for yourself or a sick loved one, if you are a woman, if you are a person of color, if you are disabled, if you practice any sort of religion, if you care about hte [sic] air you breathe and the water you drink, if you showed up to that women’s march in whatever city or state or country or town you came from, you need to fight back.”
“This country was built and continues to survive off the backs of immigrants and refugees,” she continued. “The term refugee in itself is such a significant word. These people are not terrorists: Many are escaping wars that we created in their lands.”

“We need action. Take your future back into your hands,” Jauregui said.

Jauregui concluded her letter by highlighting the work of the ACLU and the Intercommunity Peace & Justice Center, and asked her readers to fight back. Previously, Jauregui had taken a stand against President Trump in an op-ed for Billboard, writing of his supporters that they “voted for a person who built an 18-month campaign off the back of your hatred.” 

The pop star is not the only young celebrity to speak out on recent policies; the Hadid sisters were seen marching in opposition to the executive order in New York.

To read the full text of Jauregui’s letter, head to People.com.type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=588f70a2e4b02772c4e7fad0,588f5c9be4b017637795780a,588f7ddfe4b02772c4e818ec

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 13 minutes ago.

Ex-Obamacare Chief Warns Trump's Already Weakening The Health Care System

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― Andy Slavitt helped save Obamacare once already. He’s hoping he can do it again.

Until Inauguration Day, Slavitt had been acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services since March 2015. That agency oversees the two health programs in its name along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program and the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges. CMS, as it’s known, manages benefits for 140 million people and its $1 trillion budget is bigger than the Pentagon’s.

In the short time since Slavitt left federal service, he’s already seeing signs that President Donald Trump and the GOP Congress are dealing damage to the health care system before even repealing the Affordable Care Act. And health care executives are telling him the same thing, Slavitt said.

The Affordable Care Act first entered Slavitt’s life in the fall of 2013, when he helped lead the effort to salvage HealthCare.gov, the federal insurance exchange website, after its disastrous launch. From there, Slavitt left his position as group executive president of Optum, a unit of UnitedHealth Group, to join CMS as a senior official. President Barack Obama nominated Slavitt for the top job in July 2015 but the Senate never held a vote on him.

Now Slavitt is out of government, but he’s not abandoning the fight over the Affordable Care Act. In an interview with The Huffington Post, he argued that Trump is already undermining the law and threatening coverage for millions ― in spite of his repeated promises to ensure that all Americans would have health care under his policies.

“I take the new president at his word. He said he wants to expand coverage. He said he wants the coverage to be high-quality. He said he wants it to be affordable to Americans who have trouble affording health care,” Slavitt said. “Those are the right goals, and I think the president should start out with those goals. Now, the actions that we’ve seen so far don’t support those goals.”


The number one thing you hear people say is they’re petrified of the consequences of repealing the ACA without already approving a plan.
Andy Slavitt
Specifically, Slavitt cited the executive order Trump issued the day of his inauguration, which instructs federal agencies to “take all actions consistent with law to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the Act, and prepare to afford the States more flexibility and control to create a more free and open healthcare market.”

The White House subsequently signaled this could include halting enforcement of the law’s individual mandate that most Americans obtain health coverage.

Executive actions such as these, and like the Trump administration halting television advertising for the sign-up period that ends Tuesday, threaten to destabilize the health insurance market, Slavitt. These moves signal to health insurers that enrollment will be lower this year than it could have been, and that fewer of the healthy consumers needed to offset the costs of the sick will buy coverage. Without the mandate’s tax penalty for being uninsured, some consumers will opt against buying insurance.

“It increases premiums, it will send people out of the market,” Slavitt said. “Those actions that we’ve seen haven’t gotten us on the track that we would hope and that we need to be on in a bipartisan fashion, and so I’d hope that they’re quickly corrected.”

Trump has vowed to introduce a “replacement” health care reform plan for the Affordable Care Act, and congressional Republicans are grappling with how to keep their promise to repeal the law without causing the kind of disruption Slavitt is warning about. 

But the current “repeal and delay” strategy ― under which the law is repealed but not replaced for several years while Congress debates an alternative to Obamacare ― creates uncertainty about the future of the health care system that could severely damage it, he said.

Although he’s left government, Slavitt remains in contact with policymakers and with health care executives whose companies would be affected by whatever short-term and long-term changes are made to the Affordable Care Act. They’re worried, he said.

“I’ve been talking to a lot of hospital CEOs, a fair number of governors, health plan CEOs. I think the number one thing you hear people say is they’re petrified of the consequences of repealing the ACA without already approving a plan. Not introducing a plan, but approving a plan that helps them know what comes next,” Slavitt said.

“A fifth of the economy is dependent on the decisions that you make, in many respects,” Slavitt said. “Saying we may do this, we may not do that, we’re unsure about this, we’re looking like we’ll do that ― is very harmful.”

The skittishness on display among Republicans about how to repeal Obamacare without causing that harm and without facing a huge backlash from taking away health coverage from more than 30 million people gives Slavitt hope that Congress and the new administration, along with state leaders, will find a better way to move forward.

“I know there’s a lot of people who are very worried. They’re very scared. I hear from them every day. We heard from them in the thousands over the course of November and December and January. I still hear from them,” Slavitt said.

“I would say that this course, this course of repeal and delay, is not a done deal,” Slavitt said. Recent polling has shown an increase in public support for the Affordable Care Act, and the belief that Congress shouldn’t undo the law without showing the American people what Republicans want to do instead. 


Taking health care coverage away from people is easy.

Creating coverage for people is hard. We did the hard.

— Andy Slavitt (@ASlavitt) December 16, 2016


Slavitt also criticized some of the GOP proposals circulating that would attempt to address the cost of health insurance by simply having it cover fewer medical costs and require patients to shoulder a greater share of the expenses out of pocket, even compared to the high-deductible plans offered on the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges.

The Affordable Care Act requires insurers to cover a basic set of services, including hospitalizations, prescription drugs and contraception. Relaxing those requirements theoretically could lower monthly premiums, but it also would expose policyholders to the full cost of whatever isn’t covered by the insurance, Slavitt said.

“What we have to be careful of is the certainty that people think they’re buying is a good thing. And so the talk of patient choice, across state lines, all of these things, the hazard there, of course, is that you really deteriorate what insurance is,” Slavitt said.

“Health care is expensive. It’s not that health insurance premiums are just too high, it’s that the health care is too expensive. So if you make the health [insurance] cover less, it doesn’t make anything less expensive. In fact, it makes it more expensive,” he said.

“How do you know you don’t need mental health services? You don’t need it until you need it. And I think that’s the great fallacy that gets perpetuated with this idea that you can go a la carte and exclude benefits that you think you don’t need.”

The Affordable Care Act made major strides in improving the health care system, most visibly by reducing the uninsured rate to a historic low. Whatever comes next must be measured by the same standards and seek to improve the health law’s shortcomings, not create more problems, Slavitt said.


It’s not that health insurance premiums are just too high, it’s that the health care is too expensive.
Andy Slavitt
”The record is good. What we need now ― we need more competition and more affordability. And so, actions that will promote affordability and promote competition, I think, will head us the right direction. Actions which destabilize the market, create uncertainty, open up a sort of free-for-all will set us in the wrong direction. I think that’s the choice we have right now,” Slavitt said.

“Good ideas that improve the ACA are things that I will applaud and cheer no matter where they come from,” Slavitt said. “But they have to meet some basic tests. They have to help us cover more people, they have to do it with high-quality coverage, and they have to do it in a way that helps us continue to bend the cost curve, not increase it, and they have to do it in a fiscally responsible way.”

Watch The Huffington Post’s full interview with Andy Slavitt. Video produced by J.M. Rieger and Jessica Carro.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 2 hours ago.

Senior Democrats Demand Obamacare Enrollment Extension

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― The top Democrats on three major House committees want President Donald Trump to give health insurance customers two more weeks to choose plans this year.

In a letter sent to acting Health and Human Services Secretary Norris Cochran on Monday, the lawmakers say the deadline extension and other steps are needed because the Trump administration halted advertising for HealthCare.gov just days before the final deadline, which is Tuesday.

“We are deeply concerned that the administration’s seemingly intentional efforts to sabotage enrollment in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces will result in adverse risk selection, destabilize insurance markets and send premiums skyrocketing,” the Democrats wrote.

Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member Frank Pallone (N.J.), Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal (Mass.) and Education and the Workforce Committee ranking member Bobby Scott (Va.) signed the letter to Cochran, a career civil servant.

Last week, Politico reported that the administration pulled back $5 million in advertising that President Barack Obama’s administration prepaid to promote enrollment as the deadline neared.

The Trump administration also cut off email reminders, social media campaigns and other tools used to notify consumers that time was running out, Politico reported. The administration subsequently resumed the email reminders and social media outreach.

These actions threatened not only to reduce overall sign-ups but to leave in the lurch shoppers who aren’t aware the deadline is near.

Previous open enrollment periods have proved that the last days of sign-ups are among the busiest, and also that younger consumers ― crucial to keeping costs down because they use fewer health care services ― enroll in large numbers close to the deadline.

“The White House’s efforts to suppress enrollment will therefore weaken the risk pool, resulting in greater costs for everyone,” Pallone, Neal and Scott wrote.

The lawmakers also cite concern about the executive order Trump issued on his first day in office instructing federal agencies to relax Affordable Care Act rules and signals from the White House that such changes could include ending enforcement of the law’s mandate that most Americans have health coverage. That individual mandate is key to encouraging healthier, less costly consumers to buy coverage, since they face tax penalties if they don’t.

The executive order “creates the distinct impression that the administration is attempting to sabotage enrollment,” the lawmakers wrote.

In response, Pallone, Neal and Scott say, consumers should be allowed to enroll for two weeks past the original Jan. 31 deadline. In addition, the letter calls for the advertising campaign to be restored.

The Democratic lawmakers also submitted a list of questions and demands for documentation from the Department of Health and Human Services. Among them are whether the administration intends to keep the health insurance exchange call centers and HealthCare.gov in operation throughout 2017, and what the administration’s plans are for next year’s enrollment period.

Although Trump and congressional Republicans vow to repeal the Affordable Care Act and “replace” it with alternative health care reform policies, they have not agreed on a plan to do so, or how and when they should proceed. The “repeal and delay” strategy favored by House and Senate Republican leaders would require the health insurance exchanges to remain in place through at least 2018 while the hypothetical new system is erected.

As of Dec. 24, more than 11.5 million people had enrolled in private health insurance using the exchanges, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported Jan. 10, slightly surpassing the 2016 sign-up period and putting the marketplaces within reach of this year’s target. The Trump administration has not issued more recent figures. 

How will Trump’s first 100 days impact you? Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get breaking updates on Trump’s presidency by messaging us here. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 28 minutes ago.

HUFFPOST HILL - Low-Energy Huddled Masses Are Tired & Poor. Also Tempest-Tost. Sad! #MAGA

$
0
0
*Like what you read below? **Sign up for HUFFPOST HILL** and get a cheeky dose of political news every evening! *

The arrival of Donald Trump in Washington couldn’t keep snowflakes from reaching the White House today. Ollie the bobcat is on the loose in D.C. ― or, rather, after many happy years at the National Zoo, Ollie the bobcat is excited for new adventures and has retained Bob Barnett to lead its job search. And Sean Spicer told reporters,  “The president went out of his way to recognize the Holocaust,” recalling the noble spirit of your perfunctory visit to the Anne Frank museum during your weedcation in Amsterdam. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Monday, January 30, 2017:

*DIPLOMATS FILE DISSENT MEMO AGAINST MUSLIM BAN - *The memo is four-and-a-half pages long, so it’s doubtful the president will read it. Christina Wilkie: “Scores of American diplomats stationed across the globe have *drafted a formal ‘dissent memo’ to register their objections to President Donald Trump’s ban on Syrian refugees and travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries. *The draft memo, obtained by ABC News, represents the most significant opposition thus far from within the Trump administration to the president’s controversial executive order. ‘This ban...will not achieve its stated aim of to protect [sic] the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States,’ wrote the diplomats. ‘It will immediately sour relations with these six countries, as well as much of the Muslim world, which sees the ban as religiously motivated.’” [HuffPost]

*Oh:* “White House spokesman Sean Spicer was much less forgiving of the diplomats who are choosing to air their concerns. ‘They should either get with the program, or they can go,’ Spicer said Monday at a press briefing.” [Ibid.]

*UN SAYS 20,000 REFUGEES IMPACTED BY TRUMP ORDER - *Yeah, but if you think about them as Skittles in a bowl… Somini Sengupta, Maggie Haberman and Glenn Thrush: “The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said an estimated 20,000 refugees from all over the world would be impacted immediately by the executive order that freezes refugee resettlement for 120 days. Many more Syrian refugees are affected by the indefinite suspension of resettlement of Syrians. *The statement pointed to a provision in international law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion or nationality*. The executive order bars nationals of 7 countries, including Syria. ‘The High Commissioner underlines once again UNHCR’s position that refugees should receive equal treatment for protection and assistance, and opportunities for resettlement, regardless of their religion, nationality or race,’ the statement read.” [NYT]

*HE’S JUST A SIMPLE COUNTRY DOCTOR/CONNECTED INVESTOR - *Yeeeeeeep *slaps suspenders* I remember bringing little Johnny Wilcox into this world ― remember the proud look on his mammy’s face. I also remember Johnny giving me the heads up on Aetna’s Q4 earnings report. Yeeeep. James V. Grimaldi: “Rep. Tom Price got a privileged offer to buy a biomedical stock at a discount, the company’s officials said, contrary to his congressional testimony this month…. In fact,* the cabinet nominee was one of fewer than 20 U.S. investors who were invited last year to buy discounted shares of the company—an opportunity that, for Mr. Price, arose from an invitation from a company director and fellow congressmen. The shares were discounted 12% off the traded price* in mid-June only for investors who participated in a private placement arranged to raise money to complete a clinical trial. The company’s shares have tripled since the offering.” [WSJ]

*Spicer on detaining five-year-olds*: “...if they are a 5-year-old, that maybe they’re with their parents and they don’t pose a threat. But to assume that just because of someone’s age or gender or whatever that they don’t pose a threat would be misguided and wrong.” [Vox]

*SESSION THE IDEOLOGICAL PATRIARCH OF TEAM TRUMP* - Philip Rucker and Robert Costa: “The author of many of Trump’s executive orders is senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, a Sessions confidant who was mentored by him and who spent the weekend overseeing the government’s implementation of the refu­gee ban. The tactician turning Trump’s agenda into law is deputy chief of staff Rick Dearborn, Sessions’s longtime chief of staff in the Senate. The mastermind behind Trump’s incendiary brand of populism is chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, who promoted Sessions for years as chairman of the Breitbart website…. *In a lengthy email, Bannon described Sessions as ‘the clearinghouse for policy and philosophy’ *in Trump’s administration, saying he and the senator are joined at the center of Trump’s ‘pro-America movement’ and the global nationalist phenomenon.” [WaPo]

*Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s book*, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to eliot@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter - @HuffPostHill

*HOUSE DEMOCRATS SEEK TO DEFUND REFUGEE BAN - *LOL, as if this part of our checks and balances will be honored in a month. Elise Foley: “House Democrats plan to introduce a bill Monday to thwart President Donald Trump’s executive order on refugees and certain foreign nationals by denying funds to enforce it and affirming that no one should be turned away from the country based on religion or nationality. Now the question is whether Republicans who said they oppose the executive order will actually sign onto legislation to stop it. [California Rep. Zoe] Lofgren’s bill, a draft of which was provided to The Huffington Post ahead of its release, would make an amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act stating that the government cannot reject people for entry based solely on their religion or nationality.” [HuffPost]

*REFUGEE BAN IMPACTING PATIENTS *Listen, they’ve seen “Breaking Bad,” they know what a guy in a wheelchair can do. Yasmeen Abutaleb, Kristina Cooke and Mica Rosenberg : “President Donald Trump’s executive order last Friday has sowed panic and uncertainty among refugees who need urgent medical care, some of whom had prioritized applications, according to aid workers…*. The four-month U.S. ban on accepting refugees could mean as many as 800 people needing medical treatment will be denied entry*, said Karen Monken of HIAS, a Maryland-based refugee assistance organization formerly known as Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society. Before the halt, about 200 refugees with significant medical issues were being resettled in the United States each month on average, she said.” [Reuters]

*IS THIS WHAT BERNIE WAS TALKING ABOUT? *Jennifer Bendery: “More than 1,000 progressives signed up to run for office this weekend following President Donald Trump’s executive action targeting immigrants and refugees. And that’s just through one organization. *Run for Something, a new grass-roots group that helps young Democrats run for local and state office, announced Monday that it nearly doubled its total number of recruits ― from 1,200 to 2,200 ― in the last three days*…. A number of progressive grass-roots groups have cropped up since Trump’s win in November, and they, too, have seen huge interest.” [HuffPost]

*MOAR OBAMACARE PLZ -* After Trump effed with health insurance enrollment, Democratic Reps. Frank Pallone (N.J.), Richard Neal (Mass.) and Bobby Scott (Va.) say he owes consumers. Jeffrey Young: “The top Democrats on three major House committees want President Donald Trump to give health insurance customers two more weeks to choose plans this year…. ‘We are deeply concerned that the administration’s seemingly intentional efforts to sabotage enrollment in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces will result in adverse risk selection, destabilize insurance markets and send premiums skyrocketing,’ the Democrats wrote.” [HuffPost]

The guy who used to run Obamacare thinks Trump has already damaged the health care system before the law even gets repealed.

*MERRICK WHO? *Maybe you should start bracing yourself for how the Senate behaves when Ruth Bader Ginsburg steps down for health reasons in February 2020. Amanda Terkel: “*White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said he found it quite ‘sad’ that Senate Democrats are preparing to filibuster President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, without even considering his or her qualifications*. ‘He met with a bunch of Senate Democrats to talk about the qualities they want in a judge. And before they’ve even heard who this individual is, you’ve got some of them saying, “Absolutely no.” That just shows you that it’s all about politics. It’s not about qualification,’ Spicer told reporters in his daily briefing Monday.” [HuffPost]

*WHO? *- Stirring sentiment from former state senator and author Barack H. Obama. Sam Stein: “*Former President Barack Obama released a statement on Monday expressing solidarity with those protesting his successor’s ban on travelers and refugees entering the United States from certain Muslim-majority countries*. The statement, issued under the name of Obama’s spokesman Kevin Lewis, was the first time that Obama has weighed in on Donald Trump’s presidency. And though it did not mention Trump by name or directly criticize the executive order that he signed on Friday, the implication was one of disapproval. ‘President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country,’ [the statement read,] ‘With regard to comparisons to President Obama’s foreign policy decisions, as we’ve heard before, the President fundamentally disagrees with the notion of discriminating against individuals because of their faith.’” [HuffPost]

*OHHHHH, I THOUGHT THIS WAS THE PRO-LIKE MOVEMENT *CLOSES FACEBOOK* *- Take a break from the ongoing dehumanization of women to have a chuckle at this. Laura Bassett: “The organizers of a Feb. 11 anti-abortion rally have faced an unexpected snag. The planned demonstration at more than 130 Planned Parenthood health centers across the country has *attracted many would-be protesters who thought the event’s website said ‘Defend PP,’ instead of ‘Defund.’* ‘We got slammed with emails from pro-choice people wanting to come out and support Planned Parenthood,’ said Eric Scheidler, spokesperson for the Pro-Life Action League and organizer of the rally. ‘It took us a while to figure out what was going on. We were getting messages from people saying, ‘Hey, you should really change the website name ― we really want help defend our rights.’’” [HuffPost]

*THE WORLD’S TINIEST VIOLIN IS TUNED AND READY FOR CONGRESS TO CALL THE TUNE - *Lisa Mascaro: “It’s what congressional Republicans had long dreamed about: a majority in both chambers to advance conservative policies and a president from the same party to sign them into law. But the Trump White House isn’t turning out exactly the way they envisioned. The GOP establishment is experiencing whiplash after a week of President Trump bulldozing through the norms of policy and protocol….  *Rather than the hoped-for collaborative new relationship between the White House and Congress, GOP officials complain that Trump is brushing aside their advice*, failing to fully engage on drafting tough legislative packages like tax reform and Obamacare, and bypassing Congress by relying on executive actions, something they frequently complained about under President Obama.” [LA Times]

But GOP lawmakers are more afraid of Trump’s voters than they are of the republic collapsing, so they’ll get over their disappointment.

*DEREGULATORS, MOUNT UP! *This is the kind of policy a loudmouth in a bar who doesn’t follow the news would come up with. Christina Wilkie: “President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order requiring that ‘for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination.’ … The new order is in addition to the Trump administration’s regulatory freeze, which the president enacted just days after taking office…. *Consumer watchdog groups were quick to criticize the latest move by the Trump administration to keep its promises to the business community.*” [HuffPost]

*Former President George H.W. Bush released from hospital. *The 92-year-old had been under treatment for more than two weeks, and former first lady Barbara Bush also had been in ill health. [Texas Tribune’s Alex Samuels]

*MAKE BANKS EVIL(ER) AGAIN - *Glenn Thrush: “President Trump on Monday reiterated his intention to roll back Dodd-Frank financial regulations enacted to prevent another financial crisis, telling reporters that he soon planned to do ‘a big number’ on the 2010 law…. ‘Dodd-Frank is a disaster,’ the president said during a 10-minute session with reporters as he signed an executive order slashing government regulations. ‘We’re going to be doing a big number on Dodd-Frank,’ Mr. Trump said. ‘The American dream is back.’” [NYT]

*$UPPORTER$ $ET $SIGHTS ON $ELLING TRUMP’$ $COTUS $ELECTION - *This is good, because there wasn’t enough dark money flying around the president and his inner circle. Metea Gold: “A team of political strategists that worked on President Trump’s campaign and transition is launching a nonprofit to bolster his agenda, vowing to reach out directly to mobilize his supporters and circumvent the ‘liberal and biased media.’ *The new organization, called America First Policies, appears loosely modeled off Organizing for Action, the advocacy group that sprang out of former president Barack Obama’s campaigns. *Trump allies are hoping that the group will serve as a powerful outside flanking operation, particularly in defending the president’s upcoming Supreme Court pick.” [WaPo]

*HUFFPOST UNION AGREES TO CONTRACT - *Now that we’ll fully unionized, we’re all looking forward to milling around aimlessly by one person’s desk while she writes a story. Michael Calderone: “The Huffington Post ratified its first union contract Monday, becoming the largest digital news site to collectively bargain amid a series of newsroom organizing drives…. Though the yearlong contract negotiations appeared to stall last month, with some employees voicing frustration on social media, *the two sides recently came to an agreement that generated near unanimous support*.” [HuffPost]

*BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR *- Here are two pit bulls are are definitely a metaphor for something.

*BE FREE, LITTLE GUY - *Andrew Beaujon: “Ollie the bobcat is on the loose. The 25-pound feline was where she was supposed to be at 7:30 this morning, when a keeper at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo counted her. But by 10:40, she’d apparently made a run for it. Staff ‘are taking several measures to attract Ollie back to her enclosure,’ the zoo says in a press release…. Ollie is the second high-profile animal to make a daring escape from a mid-Atlantic zoo: Sunny the red panda is still at large after disappearing from the Virginia Zoo in Norfolk last Monday.” [Washingtonian]

*COMFORT FOOD*

- A 1,000-person Italian rock band performs “Smells Like Teen Spirit.”

- A never-ending slip ‘n slide.

- Overlaying “Spinal Tap” audio onto clips of President Trump.

*TWITTERAMA*

@StephenAtHome: If I were the architect for Trump’s Wall I’d build a secret exhaust port the size of a womp rat so the rebels could save the Republic.

@lindsaygoldwert: My drag name is Delta Outage

@ryanbeckwith: Loose bobcat in D.C. would have been a great “West Wing” b-plot.

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 1 day ago.

Waterboarding Washington

$
0
0
President Trump feels waterboarding works.

If you knew what he knew, wouldn't you? He heard Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham say torture works with his own ears. He said it on Twitter, which means it must be true. Defense secretary James Mattis said he'd do better with a pack of cigarettes and a couple of beers, but hey, if the president feels something, it can't be wrong. "I happen to feel," Trump said yet again last week, "that it does work."

The problem with torture is that people will say anything to make it stop. If you're afraid you're going to die, you don't care what's true, you just care about surviving. There is abundant evidence of this behavior in Washington, where the fear of political death also makes people say anything.

Consider Team Trump. Only electoral torture -- the threat of losing power -- can account for the readiness of the White House and the Republican Congress to say anything, to act as though the infotainment freak show posing as our government were perfectly normal, to pretend that having a megalomaniac in charge of our nuclear arsenal isn't the kind of emergency the 25th amendment anticipates.

At one end of Pennsylvania Ave., Mike Pence, Kellyanne Conway and Sean Spicer give no hint onstage that they know full well backstage that the man they serve is a total disaster no longer waiting to happen. A million phantom inaugural attendees; three million imaginary illegal voters; the theft of health insurance from more than 20 million people; an animus toward Mexico that will steal billions from working Americans; a Muslim ban that reads right off ISIS's script -- what fresh hell will their boss serve up for them to defend next? A de facto abortion ban? Looser libel laws to make the media, as Steve Bannon barked, "keep its mouth shut"? A sweetheart deal with Putin on sanctions?

At the other end of the avenue, the game faces that Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan wear hides their daily humiliation of humoring a tempestuous toddler; conceals their fear that their party is one golden shower away from disgrace and oblivion; masks their terror that their country is one dirty bomb away from martial law. The last best hope of the Republican leadership is an impeachment they couldn't be blamed for invoking, and a Pence presidency that would do the Tea Party proud.

Trump's behavior checks all the symptoms on the malignant narcissism tick list: sadism, aggressiveness, paranoia, hypomania, grandiosity, lack of impulse control, lack of empathy, you name it. His disorder is hiding in plain sight. Here's a clip from his interview last week with ABC's David Muir:
"That [CIA] speech was a home run.... I got a standing ovation. In fact, they said it was the biggest standing ovation since Peyton Manning had won the Super Bowl and they said it was equal. I got a standing ovation. It lasted for a long period of time.... That speech was a total home run. They loved it... People loved it. They loved it. They gave me a standing ovation for a long period of time. They never even sat down, most of them, during the speech. There was love in the room. You and other networks covered it very inaccurately.... [T]urn on Fox and see how it was covered. And see how people respond to that speech. That speech was a good speech. And you and a couple of other networks tried to downplay that speech. And it was very, very unfortunate that you did. The people of the CIA loved the speech...."
It goes on.

This is scary. This is not how a president talks. It's not even how a normal person talks. But it explains how Trump's courtiers talk. Like the denizens of Wonderland, they fear the Red Queen, who "had only one way of settling all difficulties, great or small. 'Off with his head!'" The Red Queen, Trump's doppelganger, is the mother of all narcissists, the waterboarder-in-chief. So, to save themselves from political execution, Trump's enablers, like the playing cards who paint the white roses red, confect "alternative facts." Like Humpty Dumpty, who makes words mean what he chooses, Bannon calls a free press that speaks truth to power "the opposition party." It's not. That's their job.

In his first news conference as president, Trump said that even though waterboarding "does work," he'll defer to his defense secretary's opposition. "He will override. I'm giving him that power." Here's some wishful thinking: If Mattis can get Trump to observe the Geneva Convention on torture, maybe he can get him to observe the Paris Agreement on climate change, too.

Or even -- I can dream, can't I? -- to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

This is a crosspost of my column in the Jewish Journal, where you can reach me if you'd like at martyk@jewishjournal.com.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 23 hours ago.

Covered California signups continue amid talk of Obamacare repeal

$
0
0
Californians are continuing to sign up for health insurance through the state-run marketplace created under the Affordable Care Act, despite uncertainty over the future of the federal health care law. Tuesday marks the end of the fourth open enrollment for Covered California, which began in October 2013, and it is the first such period that coincides with efforts by President Trump and congressional Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act — the law that created Covered California and expanded Medi-Cal. Covered California is the state-run insurance exchange where people can use federal subsidies to buy health plans from private insurers. Trump, on his first day in office, signed an executive order to roll back the health care law by giving federal agencies the authority to waive or defer enforcement of the law’s regulations. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, introduced this month offers a partial path to replacing the law but it has already been criticized by Democratic leaders, whose cooperation is needed to pass replacement legislation. The second, the expansion of the state’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, for low-income people and people with disabilities, has resulted in 3.8 million people gaining health insurance. People like Chen — young and relatively healthy — represent a critical demographic for the insurance exchanges because their participation helps moderate premium rates. The average rate increase for Californians buying plans on the exchange in 2017 is 13.2 percent — more than triple the 4 percent annual average increase the previous two years, according to 2017 rates released by Covered California in September. Reported by SFGate 23 hours ago.

'Heartbreaking' -- Obamacare Phone Counselor Talks About The Calls Coming In

$
0
0
The telephone operators who answer questions about Healthcare.gov, the website for buying Affordable Care Act insurance, have been busy lately. That’s not surprising, given that Tuesday is the last day to purchase coverage for the rest of 2017.

But this year, something is different: Obamacare’s future is in doubt. And that’s made for some difficult moments.

Republicans have vowed to repeal the 2010 health care law and President Donald Trump has already issued an executive order that could weaken the program while it’s still on the books. The damage to the market could start in 2018 ― or even earlier, under some scenarios.

With these possibilities getting more and more attention in the media, the people who have coverage through Obamacare are getting worried ― and, as one phone operator told The Huffington Post, they have been calling. “It’s heartbreaking, because we can’t tell these people that it will be okay, because we don’t know if it will be okay.”

The operator was careful to say that not everybody calling is in a panic. In fact, a sizable minority of people are telephoning just to say how happy they are that the law, which they really don’t like, might finally go away.

But more often than not, the callers are scared ― and it seems the attendants haven’t gotten specific guidance on what to tell them. The Obama administration would routinely send along updated scripts when a news event was likely to prompt new questions and calls, but, according to this operator, there’s been nothing like that since Trump took office.


They don’t know if they’re going to be able to take their medicines, or see their doctors.

The operator, who works for a government contractor, agreed to answer questions about this year’s open enrollment ― and what callers are saying. The only condition was anonymity, because workplace rules forbid employees from speaking to the media. (The Huffington Post verified the operator’s identity independently.)

What follows is a transcript of that interview, lightly edited for clarity.

*What are you hearing this year that is different?*

Because the website is working so much better … the people calling us don’t really need us like they needed us before. It used to be that people relied on us to walk them through the application process. Now, they just need questions answered. And now a lot of those people are asking questions like, “Will I have health insurance?” We can’t really answer them with certainty.

There’s also a clear division now. You have some people, they want to know what will happen to their health insurance. They don’t know if they’re going to be able to take their medicines, or see their doctors. And that’s about 60, maybe 70 percent of the calls we end up getting. The rest, so I guess that’s the other 30 to 40 percent, are people who are saying I can’t wait for this to go away.

*The ones who say they can’t wait for it to go away. What do they say?*

They don’t like to have to fill in an application for insurance for a doctor they can’t visit because, you know, he’s 60 miles away, in another town. It’s not someplace they go regularly. Sometimes they say that the deductibles or the monthly premiums are just too much.


Sometimes they say that the deductibles or the monthly premiums are just too much.

In the past, we’ve had people call us and they’d be like those folks you hear about ― they’d have a negative attitude about the health care law. And then they would find what the price would actually be, and they were amazed. In a good way. But there hasn’t been so much of that this year. I think everybody whose mind could have been changed has been changed.

*What about the 60 to 70 percent, the ones who are worried, what are those like?*

These people are calling in, and they want to make sure they will be covered. They want reassurances that if they sign up for insurance right now, that it will still be in effect for the rest of the year.

The answer we give them is that, according to the information we’ve been given, we believe they will have coverage. If they are signing up through open enrollment, then they should have the insurance, and they will get the tax credits if they are eligible, at least through the end of the year ― again, based on the information that has been given to us. Congress has given us no indication that they will pull everything.

The problem is that everything is so up in the air. And people know it. They are calling us with questions, and we don’t know what to tell them, because no one has given us any indication of what may happen. So there’s a general unease around here, about everyone who is calling in and talking to us. They just want to know, and we don’t feel like we have definitive answers for them.

*Has anybody shared their stories about what it would mean to lose insurance?*

In the the first couple of years, a lot of what we were doing was teaching people about insurance ― this is how coverage works. That kind of thing. And even now, we get calls from people who have never had insurance before. They don’t know what a premium is. They don’t know what a deductible is. So some of that is education.

But once they’ve been on it for a couple of years, they understand and say, okay, I wouldn’t be able to afford my medicine ― say, my insulin ― if it wasn’t for this insurance. Or they went to the doctor and found a tumor that they didn’t know they had. That’s because they had insurance now.


Everything is so up in the air. And people know it.

*You’ve actually had calls like that?*

Oh, yeah, it’s a daily thing. On average, a single CSR [customer service representative] will take anywhere from 10 to 20 calls a day, depending on the length and complexity of the questions they are getting. And I’d say usually it’s one to three calls a day are like that ― a story where somebody wouldn’t be able to afford this medicine if it weren’t for this law.

*What do you tell these people?*

Unfortunately, a lot of it is toeing the line of what we are allowed to say right now. We don’t have a whole lot of information. We can tell them that, to the best of our knowledge, nothing is changing immediately. But it flies in the face of everything we’ve seen on the television. And it’s heartbreaking, because we can’t tell these people that it will be okay, because we don’t know if it will be okay.

*Have you gotten any guidance? Was any given to you?*

No, nothing like that. There is a whole other company, a third party, responsible for writing all of our scripted information ― giving the kinds of things we are allowed to say on the phone. And they have to get clearance from CMS [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] on what we are allowed to say.

Everything from the past week has been radio silence, as to what we are and are not allowed to say.

*Is that unusual?*

Yes. Typically we have gotten updates pretty regularly, especially when there are things like this in the media. Before, if there was something in the news ... within 24 to 36 hours we would have new language and scripting, and we were allowed to say, okay, here is the new information we have.

To go a week from President Trump’s initial executive order last Friday, with almost no updates as to what may happen. I don’t even know if they know what’s going to happen yet. I don’t really think anybody knows what’s going to happen yet.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 19 hours ago.

3 Scientifically Backed Reasons Why Working Less Leads to More Productivity

$
0
0
In the United States we think about the typical work week as being 40 hours long, but Americans are actually working 47 hours a week on average. Worse than that, 4 out of every 10 Americans say they work more than 50 hours a week, and 2 out of 10 Americans say they work more than 60 hours a week.

Even if we only spend 40 hours a week in the office, mobile devices and employer provided laptops mean we're often logging on to do more work once we arrive at home. When our phones buzz with the sound of a new email, it's hard for us to resist checking our inbox and then shooting off a reply no matter what time it is.

According to the Harvard Business Review we often feel the need to respond to work related communications after hours due to ambition, pride and proving that we're valuable to our companies.

Is all of this after-hours work really helping to improve the bottom line at our companies though? Does it make us more valuable to our employers, or does it simply make us more tired?

The research says it just makes us more tired.

Companies like KPMG, Basecamp and almost every organization in Sweden (including Toyota) are making moves to reduce employee work hours. Yes you read that right!

Why? Let's dive into the reasons companies are telling employees to work less!

*1. Working Too Much Leads to Health Issues
*
The biggest concern that comes along with working long hours is a decrease in physical health.

Marianna Virtanen, a researcher at the Finnish Institute of Occupational health, found that there are clear associations between being overworked and dealing with impaired sleep and depressive symptoms. Similar studies show a correlation between overworking and Type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

When we're overworked we're more likely to sleep less, eat worse and skip exercise leading to a whole host of health issues. These issues directly and negatively affect employers because they lead to absenteeism (taking sick days), high turnover rate (quitting) and rising health insurance costs.

Essentially, in the long run employers get more out of their staff if they let them work 6 hours instead of 8 because they'll then employees take less full days off due to feeling ill.

*2. Working Longer Hours Doesn't Result in Increased Efficiency
*
The Parkinson's Law states that "work expands to fill the time available for its completion." That means if you give yourself a 8 hours to complete a 2 hour task you'll end up taking all 8 hours to finish the work.

Does filling 8 hours with 2 hours worth of work make employees more productive? Definitely not. It just means we're being less efficient.

On the flip side, "If you are empowered to hunker down and work for six hours and then leave, and this is supported by your employer, inevitably you will maximize the time you have available so that you can leave and get on with different activities in your life."

By having more time to spend doing activities outside of work that you enjoy, your quality of life improves and you're more excited to do well at work because you're happier and well rested. In fact, a study out of the University of Warwick confirmed that "happiness led to a 12% spike in productivity, while unhappy workers provided 10% less productive."

Working less hours really does lead to more productivity!

*3. Working to the Point of Exhaustion Leads to Errors
*
Research has shown that working when we're overtired leads to errors. From a management and leadership perspective, working when we're feeling exhausted leads to misreading physical cues such as facial expressions and body movements. It also leads to a mismanagement of our own emotional reactions, perhaps leading to unprofessional outbursts.

Beyond that, research shows that only 1-3% of the population can survive on five to six hours of sleep per night. Being tired also makes us much more prone to making errors. These errors can definitely impact the bottom line for our companies and also land us in hot water depending on how big the error is.

This concept of overwork leading to costly errors dates back to the 19th century. Factory owners learned to limit workdays to 8 hours so that they could reduce expensive mistakes and accidents that frequently occurred when employees were made to work 9, 10 or even more hours per day.

According to an article in Salon, "In 1914, emboldened by a dozen years of in-house research, Henry Ford famously took the radical step of doubling his workers' pay, and cut shifts in Ford plants from nine hours to eight."

Ford was initially bitterly criticized for this move, but over the next five years his competitors adopted the same model after seeing his production soar. It was at this time that many companies saw "if you wanted to keep your workers bright, healthy, productive, safe and efficient over a sustained stretch of time, you kept them to no more than 40 hours a week and eight hours a day."

By reducing hours companies saw a decrease in worker disability, less damaged equipment, reduced lawsuits and happier shareholders.

A century later and all of the lessons from the 1914s seem to have been forgotten, but companies and employees would do well to learn from the past.

*The Bottom Line
*
Employees become less efficient when they feel overworked. Stress and exhaustion lead to medical concerns, decreased efficiency and costly errors.

The secret to happy, productive and efficient employees? Less work hours!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 18 hours ago.

Health Care Costs Doubled in Patients Showing Presence of Asthma Biomarker

$
0
0
Eosinophil biomarker helps predict high risk patients, helping health insurers manage costs

White Plains, New York (PRWEB) January 31, 2017

eMAX Health Systems, LLC announced the results of new research showing almost 200% higher health care costs in patients with elevated peripheral blood eosinophil counts - a key biomarker for severe asthma and asthma exacerbations - compared to those with normal eosinophil counts. This important finding can help identify the high-risk patient with asthma to better manage the disease and reduce costs to the private and government health insurance industry struggling to manage growing asthma costs, estimated to approach $60 billion per year in medical expenses, missed school and work days, and early deaths.

Almost 26 million Americans, or 1 in 12 people, suffer from asthma. Ten percent of patients with asthma, typically those with poorly controlled disease, are responsible for a sizable proportion of all asthma costs. Identifying high risk patients by phenotype biomarkers like elevated peripheral blood eosinophils is vital to managing the disease.

“This important research has demonstrated that eosinophil elevation can help doctors and insurers predict which patient may be at greater risk of developing uncontrolled asthma,” said Julian Casciano, CEO of eMAX Health, who led the research team. “We developed a severity prediction tool that can be used by payers and provider networks to better manage asthma earlier in the disease and therapy process. This can save money and improve outcomes.” Analysis by Casciano et al. found that uncontrolled asthma with elevated eosinophils had 2 times greater hospital admissions than without elevated eosinophils.

The research reported 1-year health care costs were more than $28,000 in those with uncontrolled asthma with eosinophil elevation compared with $14,000 for those with normal range eosinophils. The association of eosinophil elevation with greater health care burden was persistent, irrespective of asthma control status. The complete peer-reviewed 2-article, available at eMAX Health's website, was published in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (the official journal of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy). The risk stratification tool utilized asthma severity definitions based on recent European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society (ERS-ATS) guidelines.

The research study was based on nearly 3,000 patients with a diagnosis of asthma derived from the EMRClaims+ database containing electronic medical records integrated with insurance claims. The integrated EMRClaims+ database has been used in dozens of published and proprietary health outcomes research projects serving the pharmaceutical, health insurance, and technology assessment industries across the globe.

About eMAX Health: eMAX Health Systems, LLC is a research and consulting company leveraging the eMAX Health Network and EMRClaims+ database to conduct global health outcomes research and data analysis in support of pharmaceutical product commercialization and market access. Reported by PRWeb 15 hours ago.

Why Louisville came out on top in the country for places to retire early

$
0
0
Remember last month, when a report found that Kentucky was the second-best state in the country for early retirement? Now we know why. That report was conducted by SmartAsset, a financial-advice website, and it found that Kentucky trailed only Wyoming in the study, which was based on factors that included tax rates, housing costs, cost of living, health insurance costs, and arts and entertainment options. Now SmartAsset has come out with a report on the best cities in the U.S. for early retirement.… Reported by bizjournals 10 hours ago.

HUFFPOLLSTER: Most Republicans Think The Media Wants Trump To Fail

$
0
0
Republicans have more faith in the White House than the media to state the facts fairly. Americans have more sympathy for refugees in theory than in practice. And most of the public is concerned about people losing their health insurance. This is HuffPollster for Tuesday, January 31, 2017.

*REPUBLICANS TRUST TRUMP MORE THAN THE MEDIA* - HuffPollster, with Paige Lavender: “According to a new HuffPost/YouGov survey, 81 percent of Republicans think the media wants Trump to fail. *Only 5 percent of Republicans said they trusted the media ‘a great deal’ to state facts fully and accurately, but 38 percent say they trust Trump and his administration to present facts fully and accurately.* A December 2016 poll revealed similar numbers among Trump voters, 56 percent of whom said they’d believe Trump over a national media outlet reporting he’d said something untrue.” [HuffPost]

*What should the role of the media be? *- The poll found that a majority of the public, 61 percent, thinks that the media should be neutral. But 36 percent of Republicans think that the media should want Trump to succeed. Just 5 percent think that it does want him to do so. *Three-quarters of Republicans say they think media coverage of Trump has been too negative*, and just 17 percent that it’s been either too positive or about right. Among all Americans, that number is 41 percent, with 14 percent calling the coverage too positive, and 27 percent saying it’s been about right.

*THE U.S. HAS LONG BEEN SKEPTICAL TOWARD REFUGEES* - HuffPollster: “Surveys taken last year found that most Americans oppose temporarily barring Muslims from other countries, but that there’s also little enthusiasm for helping Syrian refugees….In the years leading up to World War II, many Americans were also suspicious of Jews fleeing the Nazis….In theory, the public supports helping those in need. When asked in 2011 whether the inscription on the Statue of Liberty — ‘Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free’ — should still apply to immigration policy, 62 percent of Americans said it should.* In the face of a specific crisis, their views often turn less welcoming*. ‘Americans have a general reluctance to accept refugees into the U.S., even in response to situations that are clearly oppressive,’ Frank Newport, the editor-in-chief of Gallup, wrote in 2015. He noted that the firm had found majority support for allowing in refugees only once, in response to a 1999 question about bringing several hundred Albanian refugees from Kosovo.” [HuffPost]*Jens Manuel Krogstad and Jynnah Radford lay out six key facts about refugees to the U.S.* [Pew]

*Will Jordan argues that Trump’s travel ban is “a Muslim ban in all but name.”* [Borderline]

*MANY AMERICANS WORRY ABOUT LOSS OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE *- Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Emily Swanson: “Though ‘Obamacare’ still divides Americans, a majority worry that many will lose coverage if the 2010 law is repealed in the nation’s long-running political standoff over health care. A new poll by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that *56 percent of U.S. adults are ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ concerned that many will lose health insurance if the health overhaul is repealed.* That includes more than 8 in 10 Democrats, nearly half of independents, and more than 1 in 5 Republicans. Another 45 percent of Republicans say they’re ‘somewhat’ concerned….Released Friday, the poll serves as a reality check for Republicans as they try to find a path to repealing and replacing former President Barack Obama’s signature legislation. It found that even as few Americans want to keep the health law in its current form, many provisions enjoy broad popularity. The exception: the law’s requirement that most Americans carry health insurance or face fines.” [AP]

*Survey finds rising approval for ACA- *Anna Yukhananov: “Approval ratings for the Affordable Care Act jumped to 47 percent immediately after Trump came into office, up from 41 percent at the beginning of January, prior to his inauguration. That compares to 45 percent of voters who disapprove of the law, down from 52 percent. *The spike was particularly pronounced among people who say the country is on the ‘wrong track.’* Fifty-two percent of people who chose that response now approve of the ACA, up 13 percentage points from the prior poll. Approval numbers also went up more than 10 percentage points among people who care about health care, urban voters, those in the middle class and young people.” [Morning Consult]

*Few support total repeal - *Quinnipiac University: “Most American voters are satisfied with the quality and cost of their health care and say Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) should be fixed, but not repealed, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today. And voters say 84 - 13 percent that Congress should not repeal the ACA until there is a replacement plan in place. *Only 16 percent of voters say President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress should repeal all of the ACA*, while 51 percent say repeal parts of the law and 30 percent say don’t repeal any of the ACA.” [Quinnipiac]

*HUFFPOLLSTER VIA EMAIL! *- You can receive this daily update every weekday morning via email! Just click here, enter your email address, and click “sign up.” That’s all there is to it (and you can unsubscribe anytime).

*TUESDAY’S ‘OUTLIERS’* - Links to the best of news at the intersection of polling, politics and political data:

-Aaron Bycoffe tracks how often members of Congress vote with or against Donald Trump. [538]

-A new PRRI survey finds that 1-in-4 Americans think God helps determine the outcome of sporting events. [PRRI]

-YouGov polling finds that Europeans are more enthusiastic about NATO than U.S. residents. [YouGov]

-Oliver Loeder demonstrates how the Supreme Court’s ideological makeup could change after Trump nominates a new Justice. [538]

-Stuart Rothenberg argues that the House could be in play in 2018. [Inside Elections]

-Kyle Dropp and Brendan Nyhan argue Republicans have an incentive to stick with Trump to avoid being primaried. [NYT]

-Tom Jacobs reports on a study linking personal suffering to extreme ideology. [Pacific Standard]

-Shom Mazumder lays out some of the factors that make marches effective. [WashPost]

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Last Day To Sign Up For Obamacare

$
0
0
Time is running out if you need to purchase health insurance through the federal marketplace. Reported by cbs4.com 9 hours ago.

Global Wellness Institute Releases “Global Wellness Economy Monitor” - Packed with Regional & National Data on Wellness Markets

$
0
0
U.S. is by far the #1 national market, and key trends like mental wellness and more affordable products/services will boom in an age of Trump, income inequality and uncertainty

Miami, FL (PRWEB) January 31, 2017

The Global Wellness Institute (GWI) today released the "2016 Global Wellness Economy Monitor", the only research that measures and analyzes the ten markets (from fitness/mind-body to wellness tourism) that comprise the global wellness industry. Pre-released data revealed that the worldwide wellness industry grew an impressive 10.6%, to $3.72 trillion, from 2013-2015 (while the global economy shrank -3.6%) - making it one of the world’s fastest-growing, most resilient markets.

“The growth trajectory of the wellness industry appears unstoppable,” said GWI’s senior researchers, Katherine Johnston and Ophelia Yeung. “And the report released today contains a wealth of data on regional markets: from the top 20 national markets for wellness travel, spa and workplace wellness to how fast key markets will grow through 2020 to the first regional data on the emerging wellness real estate category.”

From the fact that China drove the biggest recent gains in wellness tourism revenues (300%+) to the fact that Sub-Saharan Africa is the fastest-growing spa market (40% spike in revenues)…

You can access it all IN THE FULL REPORT HERE.

U.S. Is #1 “Wellness Nation”

With the research released at a press event in NYC, a spotlight was on new data for the United States market, indicating that it is the dominant national wellness industry. The GWI produces original research on five markets: wellness tourism, the spa industry, workplace wellness, wellness real estate and thermal/mineral springs, and the U.S. ranked #1 among nations (typically overwhelmingly) for revenues in four of five of those markets (except for thermal/mineral springs, where it ranks 18th globally).

U.S. Drives Nearly 4 in 10 Wellness Travel Dollars Spent: The U.S. is the wellness travel powerhouse, generating 36%, or $202.2 billion, of the annual $563.2 billion global market. That’s three times more wellness tourism spending than the second largest market, Germany, at $60.2 billion. U.S. wellness trips jumped from 141.4 million in 2013 to 161.2 million in 2015, and revenues grew 5.8% each year.

Spa Market 2X Bigger than Any Other: Global spa facilities now generate $77.6 billion annually. And the U.S. is twice as big a spa market as its next closest competitor, China.

Top 3 Spa Markets (2015) Locations - Annual Revenues

#1 US: 24,421 locations - $18.7 billion revenue
#2 China: 12,595 locations - $7 billion revenue
#3 Germany: 6,488 locations - $5.95 billion revenue

The U.S. gained 1,569 spas from 2013-2015, while spa revenues grew 7.2% each year. The U.S. now accounts for roughly one-quarter of all global spa revenues (24%).

Largest Workplace Wellness Market By Far: The GWI estimates that unwell workers now cost the world’s economy 10-15% in output, so workplace wellness has grown to a $43.3 billion market. And the U.S. is the overwhelming leader, with employers spending $14.4 billion annually, four times more than the next largest markets, Japan ($3.4 billion) and Germany (3.1 billion). It’s no surprise that the U.S. represents one-third of the workplace wellness spend, and is growing at a 6.7% annual rate, because in America healthcare is typically provided by employers, who have powerful incentives to slash their costs and boost productivity.

First in Wellness Real Estate: Wellness real estate - homes and communities expressly designed for residents’ physical, mental, social and environmental health - is the third-fastest growing wellness market: expanding 19% from 2013-2015 (from $100 billion to $119 billion). GWI research measures this market regionally, and North America ranks #1 ($48 billion), just ahead of Asia ($41 billion).

U.S. Wellness Trends in the Age of Trump, Income Inequality & Uncertainty

In the months since GWI’s research was completed, there has obviously been radical disruption in the U.S.: a new age of Trump and uncertainty, heightened discussions about income inequality and populism, unprecedented media/social media overload of “fake news” and “alternative facts”, as well as looming repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which experts estimate would leave 18 million without health insurance.

In light of these new realities, GWI Chairman and CEO, Susie Ellis, forecasts...

Five trends that will sharpen in the U.S. wellness market in coming years:

1. A SURGE in mental wellness programming at hotels, wellness resorts, spas, fitness studios, workplaces and schools.

If wellness culture has historically focused far more on “body” than “mind” - mental wellness approaches will now boom in diverse directions: from meditation mainstreaming further (new drop-in studios, new breeds) – to sleep health, programs and technology hitting the tipping-point – to wellness centers/destinations bringing in psychotherapists and neuroscientists – to new, part-mind/part-body fitness brands - to new apps that track mental wellness and stress.

2. Wellness Beyond the Wellthy

In a country where income and “wellbeing” inequalities helped fuel a populist backlash, a U.S. wellness industry too associated with the 1% ($300 yoga pants and Reiki sessions) will change: wellness will get more democratized. We’ll see a wave of wellness products/services at lower price-points: new affordable healthy grocery stores (like Whole Foods 365); new healthy “fast-food” chains (like LYFE Kitchen, Sweetgreen); low-priced, wellness-focused hotels (like EVEN); more budget spa brands (like new brand, The Now in Los Angeles). And more “sliding scale” wellness: fitness classes and healthy restaurant prices based on income. And if wellness has been derided as essentially a-political, a new crop of spaces, clubs, retreats and gyms where wellness, feminism and politics interweave will appear.

3. Silence/Turn it Off!

In the American world of 24/7 connectedness and shrieking news/noise, more businesses and wellness destinations will take a radical new approach: silence and absolute disconnection. On the spa/wellness travel front this includes new “silent spas,” “wellness monasteries” in sacred spaces and deep nature, and hotels/resorts with “quiet room labels”, “Quiet Zone” floors and “digital kill switches”. Even silent restaurants, gyms, hair salons, stores and airports are appearing…

4. Wellness IS Home & Wellness AT Home

The home has oddly been the last frontier in wellness, but as “outside” stress ratchets up, 2017 trends forecasters concur that Americans are becoming obsessed with their home as wellness nest/sanctuary. This obsession will continue, but deepen, from DIY wellness makeovers spanning everything from installing circadian lighting to biophilic design. A whole new “wellness architecture” will rise, tackling everything from deadly indoor air pollution to adopting new “International Well Building Standards” that certify homes around dozens of healthy-for-humans’ measures. And more Americans will choose to live in the new wellness-focused communities/real estate.

5. U.S. Wellness Markets Will Grow in Years Ahead

The U.S. and global wellness industries’ growth has proven not only resilient, but even inversely correlated with economic and “human wellbeing” downturns. With looming ACA repeal and mental and women’s health programs especially targeted - and U.S. healthcare costs forecast to rise an average of 5.8% every year through 2025* - more Americans will turn to alternative, preventative health approaches. Wellness, from yoga/meditation to exercise, will become an even more sought-after antidote for an increasingly over-connected, chaotic world.

“The UN’s ‘2016 World Happiness Report’ finds that the U.S. ranks a depressing 85th among nations when it comes to equality in wellbeing among its citizens. And now more than ever the country needs more mental wellness solutions and more wellness offerings for the ‘other 99%,’” noted GWI’s Chairman and CEO, Susie Ellis. “And because the U.S. wellness market is so vast, consumer-driven and innovative, the industry will respond to these new needs and opportunities.”

For more analysis of the mental wellness, “democratization”, silence and wellness architecture/homes trends, see the Global Wellness Summit’s report, “8 Wellness Trends for 2017”.

Research Sponsors: The “Global Wellness Economy Monitor” was underwritten with support from the following industry leaders: Spafinder Wellness, Biologique Recherche, Universal Companies, Elemis, HydraFacial, Miraval, Performance Health, The BodyHoliday, Treatwell and Two Bunch Palms.

*CMS National Health Expenditure Projections, 2015-2025

For more information, contact Beth McGroarty: beth.mcgroarty(at)globalwellnessinstitute.org
or (+1) 213-300-0107.

About the Global Wellness Institute:
The Global Wellness Institute (GWI), a non-profit 501(c)(3), is considered the leading global research and educational resource for the global wellness industry, and is known for introducing major industry initiatives and regional events that bring together leaders and visionaries to chart the future. GWI positively impacts global health and wellness by advocating for both public institutions and businesses that are working to help prevent disease, reduce stress, and enhance overall quality of life. Its mission is to empower wellness worldwide. http://www.globalwellnessinstitute.org Reported by PRWeb 8 hours ago.

ACA Repeal: At What Cost?

$
0
0
Our lives are at risk. Congress has taken the first steps to repeal the Affordable Care Act. We have seen the new President sign an order to undermine the Act, as his first action in the White House! Let's take a step back and look at some real facts: thanks to the Affordable Care Act, over 20 million people have gained health insurance. Not only do millions of people have a safety net where they had none before, according to the Congressional Budget Office, "CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimate that federal deficits would increase by $353 billion over the 2016-2025 period if the ACA was repealed."¹

Now let's look at some real stories of real people. If Republican leaders in the House and Senate are successful in repealing the Affordable Care Act, many people with breast cancer could lose their coverage. Women like Vicki Tosher, an NBCC activist in Colorado and a three time breast cancer survivor who shared her story with The Denver Post. If not for the coverage Vicki receives through the Affordable Care Act, Vicki would not have had access to the treatment she needed, "For people like me, it isn't just a theoretical concern that President Trump and Congress will gamble with our healthcare system by repealing Obamacare without a comprehensive replacement plan. For me, it's a real-life threat to my retirement savings -- and my life."

Chiara D'Agostino, another breast cancer activist, shared her story with NBCC: "When I finished a Master's Degree program in Italy and returned to the U.S. in August 2014, I had no job or insurance. I applied for insurance under Obamacare and got accepted for Medicaid in September. In October, I found a lump in my breast and was diagnosed with Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Stage III. Medicaid under Obamacare covered all of the treatment costs ... In August 2016, I was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, and I continue to get full coverage. I'm very worried about what could happen with a new president. Medicaid is saving my life, and I don't know what I would do without it."

Because of women like Chiara, Vicki and thousands of others, the National Breast Cancer Coalition has advocated for guaranteed access to quality care for all since its inception in 1991. We believe access to care is a right, not a luxury. . We made it our top public policy priority and developed the framework for what this legislative approach should look like. While we understand the ACA has not been a perfect plan, it has, without a doubt, saved lives.

But here's what happens if it's repealed, beyond its affect on the deficit. The Congressional Budget Office recently released a report that details how legislation to repeal key parts of the Affordable Care Act, would affect Americans. The CBO analyzed legislation enacted by the last Congress, and vetoed by President Obama, H.R. 3762, According to the report, 18 million people would lose coverage the first year if this or a similar repeal bill becomes law, and that number will increase to 32 million uninsured by 2026. For those who remain insured through individual policies, it is estimated that premiums will rise 20 to 25 percent in the first year, rising to an increase of 50 percent following elimination of the Medicaid expansion by 2026².

In addition to rising premiums and lost safety nets, repeal of the ACA will impact jobs. A report published recently by the Commonwealth Fund found that: "Repeal results in a $140 billion loss in federal funding for health care in 2019, leading to the loss of 2.6 million jobs (mostly in the private sector) that year across all states. A third of lost jobs are in health care, with the majority in other industries. If replacement policies are not in place, there will be a cumulative $1.5 trillion loss in gross state products and a $2.6 trillion reduction in business output from 2019 to 2023. States and health care providers will be particularly hard hit by the funding cuts."

Why is it that Congress and the White House hate this law so much? A law that has saved lives, saved money and created jobs? For the millions of women and men currently living with breast cancer, access to quality and affordable healthcare could mean life or death. Why do our leaders not care about our lives?

A Call to Action
For those who have benefited from enrolling in the Affordable Care Act, and/or expansion of Medicaid in your state, we want to hear from you. Send your personal stories to MyACAStory@breastcancerdeadline2020.org and we will share them through our social media channels and with Congress. If you and others in your community are involved in rallies or other events, we would also love to share your experiences through brief videos, which can be downloaded to this link. Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences and help us fight this crucial battle.

1. Congressional Budget Office, Budgetary and Economic Effects of Repealing the Affordable Care Act (CBO, June 2015)
2. Congressional Budget Office, How Repealing Portions of the Affordable Care Act Would Affect Health Insurance Coverage and Premiums (CBO, January 2017)
3. Leighton Ku, Erika Steinmetz, Erin Brantley, and Brian Bruen, Repealing Federal Health Reform: Economic and Employment Consequences for States, The Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief January 2017.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

Trump To Name High Court Pick As Democrats Plan Fight

$
0
0
President Donald Trump was set to unveil his pick for a lifetime job on the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday as Democrats, still fuming over the Republican-led Senate’s refusal to act on former President Barack Obama’s nominee last year, girded for a fight.

Trump said on Monday he would reveal his choice to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016, at the White House at 8 p.m. on Tuesday (0100 GMT on Wednesday). The court is ideologically split with four conservative justices and four liberals, and Trump’s pick is expected to restore its conservative majority.

Three conservative U.S. appeals court judges appointed to the bench by Republican former President George W. Bush were among those under close consideration.

They are: Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; Thomas Hardiman, who serves on the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; and William Pryor, a judge on the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Under the Constitution, a president’s Supreme Court nomination requires Senate confirmation.

Democrats remain enraged over Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s refusal last year to allow the Senate to consider Obama’s nomination of appeals court Judge Merrick Garland for the vacant seat, an action with little precedent in U.S. history.

Gambling that Republicans would win the presidency in the Nov. 8 election, McConnell argued that Obama’s successor should get to make the pick. The senator’s gamble paid off with Trump’s victory, but the court has run shorthanded for nearly a full year.

A Supreme Court justice can have influence in national affairs for years or decades after the president who made the appointment has left office. Some Democrats have said the Republicans stole a Supreme Court seat from Obama.

Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley vowed to pursue a procedural hurdle called a filibuster for Trump’s nominee, meaning 60 votes would be needed in the 100-seat Senate unless its long-standing rules are changed. Trump’s fellow Republicans hold a 52-48 majority, meaning some Democratic votes would be needed to confirm his pick.

“We need to fight this Constitution-shredding gambit with everything we’ve got,” Merkley said in a statement.

Trump’s appointee could be pivotal in cases involving abortion, gun, religious and transgender rights, the death penalty and other contentious matters.

McConnell on Monday warned Democrats that senators should respect Trump’s election victory and give the nominee “careful consideration followed by an up-or-down vote,” not a filibuster.

Trump, who took office on Jan. 20, said last week he would favor Senate Republicans eliminating the filibuster, a change dubbed the “nuclear option,” for Supreme Court nominees if Democrats block his pick.

Gorsuch, Hardiman and Pryor possess strong conservative credentials.

Gorsuch, 49, joined an opinion in 2013 saying that owners of private companies can object on religious grounds to a provision of the Obamacare health insurance law requiring employers to provide coverage for birth control for women.

Hardiman, 51, has embraced a broad interpretation of the constitutional guarantee of the right to bear arms and has backed the right of schools to restrict student speech.

Pryor, 54, has been an outspoken critic of the court’s 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion, calling it “the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history.” Conservatives are hoping the high court will back restrictions imposed on the procedure by some Republican-governed states.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Chung, Ayesha Rascoe, Lawrence Hurley and Doina Chiacu; Writing by Will Dunham; Editing by Paul Simao, Jonathan Oatis and Susan Heavey)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 6 hours ago.

Time Is Running Out To Sign Up For ‘Obamacare’

$
0
0
Time is running out if you need to purchase health insurance through the federal marketplace. Reported by cbs4.com 4 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images