Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

The Rigging Of The American Market

$
0
0
The Rigging Of The American Market Submitted by Robert Reich via RobertReich.org,

Much of the national debate about widening inequality focuses on whether and how much to tax the rich and redistribute their income downward.

But *this debate ignores the upward redistributions going on every day, from the rest of us to the rich.* These redistributions are hidden inside the market.

*The only way to stop them is to prevent big corporations and Wall Street banks from rigging the market.*

*For example, Americans pay more for pharmaceuticals than do the citizens of any other developed nation.*

That’s partly because it’s perfectly legal in the U.S. (but not in most other nations) for the makers of branded drugs to pay the makers of generic drugs to delay introducing cheaper unbranded equivalents, after patents on the brands have expired.

This costs you and me an estimated $3.5 billion a year – a hidden upward redistribution of our incomes to Pfizer, Merck, and other big proprietary drug companies, their executives, and major shareholders.  

*We also pay more for Internet service than do the inhabitants of any other developed nation.*

The average cable bill in the United States rose 5 percent in 2012 (the latest year available), nearly triple the rate of inflation.

Why? Because 80 percent of us have no choice of Internet service provider, which allows them to charge us more.

Internet service here costs 3 and-a-half times more than it does in France, for example, where the typical customer can choose between 7 providers.  

And U.S. cable companies are intent on keeping their monopoly.

*It’s another hidden upward distribution* – from us to Comcast, Verizon, or another giant cable company, its executives and major shareholders.

Likewise, the interest we pay on home mortgages or college loans is higher than it would be if the big banks that now dominate the financial industry had to work harder to get our business.

As recently as 2000, America’s five largest banks held 25 percent of all U.S. banking assets. Now they hold 44 percent – which gives them a lock on many such loans.

If we can’t repay, forget using bankruptcy. Donald Trump can go bankrupt four times and walk away from his debts, but the bankruptcy code doesn’t allow homeowners or graduates to reorganize unmanageable debts.

*So beleaguered homeowners and graduates don’t have any bargaining leverage with creditors – exactly what the financial industry wants.  *

The net result: *another hidden upward redistribution – this one, from us to the big banks, their executives, and major shareholders*.

Some of these upward redistributions seem to defy gravity. Why have average domestic airfares risen 2.5% over the past, and are now at their the highest level since the government began tracking them in 1995 – while fuel prices, the largest single cost for the airlines, have plummeted?

Because America went from nine major carriers ten years ago to just four now. Many airports are now served by one or two.

This makes it easy for airlines to coordinate their fares and keep them high – resulting in another upward redistribution.

*Why have food prices been rising faster than inflation, while crop prices are now at a six-year low?*

Because the giant corporations that process food have the power to raise prices. Four food companies control 82 percent of beef packing, 85 percent of soybean processing, 63 percent of pork packing, and 53 percent of chicken processing. 

*Result: A redistribution from average consumers to Big Agriculture.*

*Finally, why do you suppose health insurance is costing us more, and co-payments and deductibles are rising?*

One reason is big insurers are consolidating into giants with the power to raise prices. They say these combinations make their companies more efficient, but they really just give them power to charge more.

Health insurers are hiking rates 20 to 40 percent next year, and their stock values are skyrocketing (the Standard & Poor’s 500 Managed Health Care Index recently hit its highest level in more than twenty years.)

*Add it up – the extra money we’re paying for pharmaceuticals, Internet communications, home mortgages, student loans, airline tickets, food, and health insurance – and you get a hefty portion of the average family’s budget.*

Democrats and Republicans spend endless time battling over how much to tax the rich and then redistribute the money downward.

*But if we didn’t have so much upward redistribution inside the market, we wouldn’t need as much downward redistribution through taxes and transfer payments.*

Yet as long as the big corporations, Wall Street banks, their top executives and wealthy shareholders have the political power to do so,* they’ll keep redistributing much of the nation’s income upward to themselves.*

Which is why the rest of us must gain political power to stop the collusion, bust up the monopolies, and *put an end to the rigging of the American market.* Reported by Zero Hedge 13 hours ago.

Obamacare Open Enrollment: 5 Things You Should Know

$
0
0
This story was originally published by Berkeley Wellness.

The Affordable Care Act has reduced the nation’s uninsured population to a record low, but if you are among the 15 percent who purchase health insurance directly, instead of getting it through an employer, Medicare, or Medicaid, here are five things you need to know to get the best, most affordable health coverage.

1. You must purchase or change plans within the annual Open Enrollment period. This year, Open Enrollment for 2016 started Nov. 1, 2015 and ends on Jan. 31, 2016. Miss this window, and there won’t be any way to get insurance, or to change to a different plan, for the rest of 2016. If you sign up or switch plans by Dec. 15, your new coverage will start Jan. 1, 2016. (There are a few exceptions to this rule: If you lose other coverage during the year, for example by losing a job, getting divorced, or moving to another state, you’re entitled to a Special Enrollment Period to get new coverage at any time.)

2. You may be entitled to more financial help than you thought. Depending on your income, you might qualify not only to receive a government subsidy for your insurance premium, but also for help with out-of-pocket costs like deductibles and copays. For instance, a two-person household can get a tax credit to offset part of the premium if their annual income is below $63,720. An income below $39,825 entitles them to buy special plans with reduced out-of-pocket costs. In most cases, the ACA uses the “adjusted gross income” line on your latest tax return, which in some cases could be considerably less than your total income. Healthare.gov has an easy-to-use calculator to assess what types of subsidies and discounts you’re likely eligible for.

3. The cost of your plan could change—a lot—from year to year. Health insurance premiums reset every year, based on the insurance companies’ projections of how much they need to collect to cover their members’ health care costs. And in 2016, as in previous years, changes are all over the map­ — up significantly for some plans in some localities, down in others. If you already have insurance and don’t do anything, your plan will automatically renew for 2016. To avoid an unwelcome surprise when your first 2016 premium comes due, it’s a good idea to price out your options during Open Enrollment, which will show you whether your current plan is still the best value for you. This is especially true if you receive a tax credit to help with premiums. Because of the way the credit is calculated, it can potentially make the price swing even more severe in certain circumstances.

4. If you choose not to sign up for insurance, you’ll pay a (potentially much) higher penalty in 2016 than in 2015. This year, the penalty was only 1 percent of household income or $95 per person, whichever was higher. In 2016, it will be the higher of 2.5 percent of household income or $695 per person.

5. If you get bogged down buying or renewing online, pick up the phone and get some expert help. The actual application process can be confusing, especially if you have multiple or irregular sources of income, are self-employed, or have a complicated family situation. If you aren’t sure how to proceed, or sense you have gotten off-track with your online application, use HealthCare.gov’s Find Local Help service to hook up with an expert, trained assister who can personally walk you through the process free of charge. Many insurance brokers are also trained to help. If you live in a state with its own health insurance exchange—for example, Covered California and Massachusetts Health Connector—you can bypass HealthCare.gov and find help directly through your state exchange.

*See also:* New to Medicare? 6 Things to Know and How to Pick the Best Health Plan.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 12 hours ago.

Health Plans Expect Group Premium Increase of 7.2% in 2016, 10.8% for Individuals

$
0
0
PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--According to Sherlock Company’s poll of 69 health plans, premium rates for groups are expected to climb by 7.2% and by 10.8% for individuals in 2016. The health care cost trend is expected to be 6.6% for groups and 11.9% for individuals. Sherlock Company estimates that the proportion of health insurance coverage directly paid by consumers as opposed to benefit plan sponsors will increase by 11.0% for groups and 15.6% for individuals, though the latter largely refe Reported by Business Wire 11 hours ago.

QuoteWizard Helps Consumers Navigate 2016 Health Care Open Enrollment

$
0
0
If you are shopping for a healthcare plan during open enrollment, let QuoteWizard help you compare multiple plans to find the best plan for you.

Seattle, WA (PRWEB) November 02, 2015

The “open enrollment” period that allows Americans to buy health coverage through the federally mandated Health Insurance Marketplace starts on Sunday, Nov. 1.

That’s an important date to keep in mind. Why? People who don’t get health insurance through the Health Insurance Marketplace or their employers between Nov. 1 of this year and Jan. 31, 2016, probably won’t be able to sign up for a plan until the next open enrollment period rolls around late next year.

Here are a few other dates and details to take note of during this open enrollment period:· To be able to access health coverage on Jan. 1, complete the enrollment process by Dec. 15.
· Miss that deadline and fail to enroll until sometime between Dec. 16 and Jan. 15, and coverage will kick in on Feb. 1.
· Wait until the end of the enrollment period (Jan. 16 through Jan. 31) to sign up for a plan and 2016 coverage won’t begin until March 1.

What happens to those who miss the enrollment period completely? They’ll only be able to get 2016 coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace if they qualify for a Special Enrollment Period. (Unless they gain access to health insurance through an employer.) And for that to happen, certain life events--like getting married or having a baby—must have kept the consumer in question from buying it during open enrollment.

That’s not the only reason to sign up for health coverage via the Health Insurance Marketplace between Nov. 1, 2015, and Jan. 31, 2016. Another reason: folks who miss that window and don’t qualify for an exemption have to pay a fee that could add up to $695 per person or 2.5 percent of their yearly household income, whichever is greater.

QuoteWizard can help with this often daunting process. The Seattle-based company connects consumers with licensed health insurance professionals who can answer their questions. QuoteWizard also helps consumers compare quotes from these carriers so they can get the best rates for the amount and type of coverage they need.

About QuoteWizard
QuoteWizard is a leading marketing and technology company in the insurance lead industry. Founded in 2006 and headquartered in Seattle, QuoteWizard is privately held and has over 140 employees.

Inc. Magazine has featured QuoteWizard on its Inc. 5000 list every year since 2010. Also, the Initiative for a Competitive Inner City has named the company on its Inner City 100 list for the last three years, while the Puget Sound Business Journal has included QuoteWizard on its Fastest-Growing Private Companies in Washington list four out of the last six years. Deloitte singled out QuoteWizard in its Technology Fast 500 in 2012, 2013, and 2014. Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Columbus is only Ohio major metro area where insurers are raising '16 Obamacare premiums

$
0
0
Franklin County is the only major metropolitan area where insurers are raising premiums for 2016 on the benchmark Obamacare plan on the subsidized federal health insurance marketplace, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In 2015 Columbus' home county had lower premiums than Cuyahoga, Hamilton or Montgomery counties on the exchange, according to the report: $200 a month for a 27-year-old individual. The price correction takes that up 20 percent to $240 for 2016… Reported by bizjournals 10 hours ago.

Rx Savings Solutions lands deal with big financial firm

$
0
0
Rx Savings Solutions has a common theme written on its prescriptions for another group of consumers: savings. Just in time for the opening of the Affordable Care Act's health insurance marketplace, the Overland Park-based company announced Monday that it landed a new partnership with financial giant American Century Investments for an undisclosed amount. The Rx Savings program alerts members through text messages or email when an opportunity exists to obtain savings on prescriptions in their pharmacy… Reported by bizjournals 10 hours ago.

Will Hillary Fight the Necessary Fight?

$
0
0
*We Need a Democratic President Who is a Fighter*

It has been clear since W. was president that something has gone seriously wrong in the United States. The central ingredients of this crisis can be summarized in this way:

• a coherent and destructive force has taken over the political right, and
• the response from Liberal America has been woefully weak.

(These points are extensively developed in my book, What We're Up Against, and will simply be asserted here.)

The power of that destructive force has already grown so large that it will take all we've got to defeat it. But there are two important grounds for hope.

First, we see before our eyes that the Republican Party is in the process of destroying itself. Such self-destruction seems to be a pattern when people get caught up in such a force. (For three previous examples of this, see my essay, "Those Whom the Gods Would Destroy, They First Drive Mad", that title being a line from Euripides.]

Second, no one can be better placed to fight and defeat this force than a Democratic president who is able and willing to do so. And, as I suggested in my recent piece here, "A Message of Optimism From a Veteran Raiser of the Alarm", Hillary Clinton's performance before the Benghazi committee gives us reason for optimism that she might have what it takes to do the job.

But I have had such hopes dashed before. Once previously we had an opportunity for compelling the Republicans to choose between coming back from the dark side or being driven into oblivion. That, of course, was with the election of Barack Obama.

(That Barack Obama failed miserably in dealing with the Republicans is something I know that many Democrats do not like to hear, and it is something that gives me no pleasure to say. But the truth of that is too clear to be denied, and can be shown in many ways -- as I do in What We're Up Against. I appreciate the things he has succeeded in accomplishing, and I continue to wish him all success. But his performance on what I called "Job One" from before the beginnings of his presidency was the most profound disappointment I've ever experienced, and the most bewildering spectacle I've ever witnessed.)

It took six years for Barack Obama to realize what became blatantly obvious within months of his inauguration: the Republicans were not interested in working with him to solve problems, but only in destroying him.

The other day on The Rachel Maddow Show, Rachel asked Hillary whether President Obama had been naïve in not figuring out more quickly that the Republicans were not interested in working with him to accomplish things for the country, but rather only wanted to block him every way they could. Hillary's response side-stepped the invitation to criticize Obama, and pivoted instead to affirm how "sincere" was the president's desire to work with both sides of the aisle to get things done.

Hillary Clinton, we know, harbors no illusions about these Republicans.

That she understands what somehow took Obama six years to figure out was demonstrated by her answer to the question, posed to all the candidates in that first debate, as to what "enemies" they were most "proud to have made." Her reply "Well, in addition to the NRA, the health insurance companies, the drug companies, the Iranians. ... Probably the Republicans."

It is important to recognize when someone simply insists on being an enemy. Not interested in finding common ground. Not interested in achieving harmony. Insistent that the relationship be one of conflict, an unceasing struggle for power.

Hillary gets that.

It is revelatory that old likeable Joe Biden decided to make a dig at Hillary over precisely that statement of hers, saying, "I don't think we should look at Republicans as our enemies," and that Hillary's remark was "mean-spirited" and "petty.""We have to end the divisive, partisan politics that is ripping this country apart," said the vice president -- as if he had not noticed that President Obama had sought in vain to do just that for six years, and all he got for it was getting skunked in the two off-year congressional elections, and having to retreat from all hopes of getting anything accomplished through the legislative process.

Biden's remarks on this subject thus make it doubly good news that he has withdrawn from the race. Not only because it will enable the Democrats to unify more quickly, but because the vice president has thereby shown that -- despite the evidence of the past seven years -- he still does not understand "what we're up against."

It is important to know the difference between a time to build bridges and a time to wage war.

Given what we're up against, an "end [to] the divisive partisan politics that is ripping this country apart" requires not friendly Joe Biden's extending a hand of friendship that will only get bitten as President Obama's so consistently was.

It requires, rather, that Democrats fight against that destructive force. It requires that the force -- that has given us W.'s lawless presidency, followed by irresponsible obstructionism, wanton wielding of falsehoods, and scandals like Trey Gowdy's Benghazi committee -- be made politically non-viable and thereby defeated.

So the next leader of the Democratic Party needs to be ready and able to lead that fight.

*Will Hillary Take on Bernie's Fighting Spirit?*

The one Democratic candidate that we know for certain is animated by a fighting spirit is Bernie Sanders. He comes forward with moral passion. He is unintimidated by the might of the powers he is challenging. When he says, "I will govern based on principle. not poll numbers," we know he means it. But, as I've suggested in my most recent previous piece here, it is now -- in the wake of Hillary Clinton's two recent bravura performances -- almost certain that she, and not Bernie Sanders, will be the Democratic nominee.

But in that same piece, I also suggested a way that the Spirit of Bernie could be transmitted to Hillary, the presumptive Democratic standard bearer -- the better to position her to be the fighter we need. (The heart of the idea developed there was that at that point in the primaries where the outcome has become so clear that Bernie Sanders is pressed to acknowledge it, he issue a challenge to Hillary, asking her: "Will you commit to fighting the battles that I would have fought if I were president?")

So the question arises: Would Hillary Clinton take that spirit on, and will she allow it to guide how she conducts her presidency?

I believe she will, but I have two main concerns.

First, there is the question of how thoroughly she supports the causes that have inspired Bernie Sanders and his followers -- particularly when they come up against the Big Money power that is part of the force animating the Republicans, and to which the Clintons have had strong connections. Bernie seems to have compelled her to move toward him during their contest, but does she believe in her heart in those causes?

My belief is that Hillary still is driven by the ideals she had when she was younger, and/but she has embraced the reality that to get things done one has to become bedfellows with the powerful. I am guessing that she would prefer the same kind of America Bernie wants.

My fear is that perhaps she has conceded too much to the "realities" of power, and that she lacks the vision of how of the kind of popular uprising that Bernie has sought to inspire could replace whatever power from Big Money she might lose by fighting the necessary battles.

My second main concern is that Hillary may shy away from battle where it can be avoided. That would be a natural response to the kind of trauma she has experienced now for more than twenty years from the serious abuse to which this ruthless force on the right has subjected her. By the time Hillary spoke in 1998 of a "vast right-wing conspiracy" that had been gunning for the Clintons, she had already endured for years a barrage of vicious and irresponsible attacks (Vince Foster, etc.).

So the same set of experiences that gives her deep knowledge of what we're up against may also make her hesitant -- as, say, an FDR would not have been -- about going after her enemies.

But I am reassured by the thought that it quite likely will not be necessary for Hillary to choose the confrontation. The evidence suggests that she can rely upon the Republicans to initiate the fight, one assault coming upon another. That was how the battle just fought out before the Benghazi committee came about: the Republicans insisted on having that fight, and Hillary turned it into a rout.

As in Aikido, someone expert in using the attacker's force against him can win without ever making the first move.

And if Hillary does make the pledge (Part 2) to take on the battles that Bernie would have fought, had he been president, pressing those issues should suffice to assure that the Republicans will initiate confrontations in scandalous ways that she can expose.

So I am feeling hopeful. There is a plausible path here toward an absolutely crucial victory.

It is possible that, at the end of the 2016 election process, we will have a President Hillary Clinton ready, willing, and able to take on this destructive force. Able not just to take it on, but also to help the American people see this terrible force for what it is and, thereby, be moved repudiate it.

Just maybe we can win this thing in the coming several years.

See the evil. Call it out. Press the battle.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

When You're On Your Phone in the Elevator I Feel So Close To You

$
0
0
Hey, I'm so sorry. I totally get that you're in a private conversation, and I know we don't know each other and it's just coincidence we're in this small confined space together. But can I confess this funny feeling I'm having? It's about your friend - did you call him Steve?

I'm serious, yes! I have a strong sensory thing where I get excited by certain types of voices, and Steve has this melodious, baritone cheerfulness that's doing something to me. Is he single? Wait, don't tell me yet. But would you want to describe me to him?

Yay! My name is Nora.

5 foot 3 inches.

You flatter me! I'm actually 110 llbs. When I'm not PMS-ing.

And please tell Steve that I did that drive he's doing now, and I'm jealous. The Pacific Coast Highway is stunning. STEVE, I HOPE YOU'RE USING YOUR HANDS-FREE HEADSET!

Did he hear me? Can you tell him, so I don't have to yell in the elevator again, that if I could, I'd do that drive forever, up and down the coast, day after day, till my whole life is over. Except I get this pinched nerve thing in my leg, which makes driving a bummer. BUT I'M NOT IN ANY PAIN NOW, STEVE! DID YOU JUST ASK HOW I WAS?

Wait, don't take my picture yet. The lighting in here is to die, plus I'm all slumping into the railing, so you won't feel like I'm in your space. But what's your name? Wait, don't tell me. Let's hold onto the mystery while we still can. Real mystery is dead. Like yesterday, I ran into a guy I had a thing with about 8 years ago, and he looked good, but I didn't do a stop-and-chat. I said, "Hi, Gustav," and Gustav said, "Long time no see," and his voice was bellowing and cheerful, but I just kept walking. Is this your floor?

Ok, well, listen - I'll come with. You're up for company, right? You wouldn't get on a phone in an elevator and expose the details of your life to me, when I'm forced to listen to every word, if you weren't passively seeking my attention, right?

Hey, don't get defensive. We're all a little lonely these days, even with our magic phones and instant touch screens. It's like this thing I had with Gustav, 8 years ago. It lasted maybe 2 months and then we both went back into the void. Oh! Your view is like mine but slightly different. I'm five floors above you, and more towards the park, so I get heaps of light and I can see the top of the Empire State Building. I had the Freedom Tower in my skyline when I moved in 7 months ago, but that's gone now since those 3 high rises went up. But, with Gustav, sometimes I regret that I slept with him. He wasn't by any stretch right for me. He was just wrong wrong wrong.

Fair question. I'd say the first thing was, his insecurity was grating. I don't like a guy who has to talk and talk and talk all the time. Also, he was emotionally unmoored. And slovenly in his home life. And he was obsessed with counterfeit watches. But we had good chemistry and we enjoyed the sex until I cut him off, basically.

STEVE, THE GUSTAV THING IS ALL IN THE PAST. NOT TO WORRY.

But I've decided I have no regrets. Because I finally realized that if I only slept with the "right" guys, I'd still be a virgin.

Maybe don't tell Steve I said that.

Thanks, but I don't drink beer. Bloat city.

Tequila is good. But it's kind of early in the day, right? Is this the one Ray Liotta drinks? Or is it George Clooney's? Should we put Steve on speaker?

I know what you guys're thinking. You're thinking: Has this lady really only slept with wrong guys? And the answer is, Yes! They were all wrong.

You're all wrong! Ha!

Seriously, the only right guy is the guy who loves me and who's stable, and we share good, workable sexual chemistry. And he wants a relationship. I've never encountered that, all in one package. Yes, lime. Salt. Yum. I know I'm a little neurotic and I have some unresolved trust issues, so maybe I'm bringing my own stuff to the table.

Sure, I'm ready for your name now.

So: Dave, Steve, when I'm working on opening my heart to a real relationship, I should be having some sex, right? Even if it's with the wrong guy. Or guys?

You don't have to tell me, because I know the answer is "Yes," because I tried it the other way. A few years ago I cut out any guy in my life who was wrong, and what happened was, there was no one left to sleep with.

I love this coffee table. Is it West Elm? Can I put my feet on it? Fresh pedi, see? Thanks, Dave! It's called Blue My Sole. Get it? Sole, like feet. Not soul, as in my spirit is drowning in viscous blue lacquered inky disillusionment. Because then I waited for someone to come along, who I could have a fulfilling, sexually healthy relationship with. And I waited. And waited. And then I basically forgot to have sex. Do guys ever forget to have sex?

Because for me, it was like, use it or lose it. Next thing I knew, so much sex-free time had passed, I actually had to schedule a follow-up appointment with my gynecologist to complete a routine pelvic exam that should only have taken minutes. TMI? I just mean I was too tense and locked up to get through the whole thing in one shot.

Sure, you can take my picture now. Can you see through this dress? Steve, your laughter is melting me. Dave, do you have chips and salsa? I love how you put your sofa at this clever angle. Mine is pushed straight to the wall. Just a few inches and a slight angle makes a major difference in the overall feel. That's what she said!

But mostly I'm realizing it's best to have sex - maybe even lousy sex - before it's too late again, because my health insurance is bullshit and these gynecological checkups add up. All the tissue they swab and snip and send around for testing, and the labs don't care if your cells are responding on the one hand to the low-grade stress of being single and on the other hand to the shock of exposure to strange male fluids at unpredictable intervals.

Steve, we've got some lovely pics of me to send you. When you're back in town, could we all go to that Thai place you were talking about when we were in the lobby? I can't do spicy or oily, and I'm trying to stay away from noodles and rice. But I love Thai.

You're right, Steve, you should focus on your driving. Send us pics of Big Sur when you can. Ciao!

Dave, please send Steve the first and the third pics. Keep the second one for yourself. Yes, I'd love another shot. I'll pour. You get the lime and salt.

Image courtesy of adamr at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

Your Health Insurance Premiums Are About To Go Through The Roof -The Stunning Reason Why

$
0
0
Your Health Insurance Premiums Are About To Go Through The Roof -The Stunning Reason Why After years of delays and failed launches, Obamacare has finally taken hold, and with it the economic and financial implications from this mandatory tax are finally being felt.

We have extensively covered how Obama's Affordable Care Act will end up being a failure,  observing both the economic implications in "In Latest Obamacare Fiasco, Most Low-Income Workers Can't Afford "Affordable Care Act" as well as its operational shortcomings in "Obamacare Is A Disaster: Co-Op Insurers Across America Are Collapsing, And Now There Is Fraud", paradoxically even as Obamacare - *a tax *- according to the BEA was the biggest contributor to growth in the Q3 GDP print.

Of course, the most obvious reason why Obamacare will have a dire impact the economy is also very simple: soaring healthcare premiums, also covered before...

 

... which incidentally also explain why all those touted "gas savings" refuse to materialize in discretionary spending behavior: all of the "saved" money goes to cover rising health insurance costs.

None of the above should come as a surprise.

What should, however, is that according to a very unexpected twist, healthcare premiums are about to soar so much in the coming months that the shocking increases of the past year will seem like a walk in the park.

The reason for this comes courtesy of a new report from the WSJ which explains something few if any had expected: corporate insurers are scrambling to profit from Obamacare!

Yes, we know: Obamacare was written by the health insurance companies, and it was supposed to benefit them first and foremost as US households struggled to catch up to what most rational observers had said would be surging premiums. And, on the top line, it did just that: "under the ACA, insurers have seen an influx of new membership in individual plans and in Medicaid plans they administer for the government, *expanding the industry’s total U.S. revenue to $743 billion in 2014, the year the law’s biggest changes took effect, from $641 billion the year before, according to a new analysis by consulting firm McKinsey & Co.*"

So far so good, and just as expected - incidentally, that 16% increase in industry revenue comes right out of your pocket, dear U.S. reader with the blessings of the US Supreme Court of course.

But where it gets fascinating is that while the surge in the top-line was expected, what comes as close to a black swan as possible, is what happens below the revenue line on the insurers' income statement.

The stunning finding comes from a new analysis by McKinsey which notes that *much of that revenue growth has been unprofitable! *Health insurers lost a total of $2.5 billion, or on average $163 per consumer enrolled, in the individual market in 2014, McKinsey found. A number are also expecting to lose money on their marketplace business for 2015.

 

The simple bullet point summary:

· *Insurance industry revenues surged by 16% thanks to Obamacare*
· *However, its costs surged by... more than 16%*

How is this possible?

Shouldn't all the benefits courtesy of the Obamacare tax flow through largely unobstructed to the bottom line? The answer, it appears, is no.



At big insurer Aetna Inc., the evidence of the law’s impact could be spotted last month in a Phoenix classroom, where Aetna was training a class of customer-service hires who will support a suite of re-engineered ACA marketplace plans dubbed “Leap.” Those products will have a different service approach, with fewer automated phone prompts and a completely new staff that is supposed to spend more time solving customers’ problems.

 

A trainee stood at a whiteboard, drawing stick figures with speech bubbles in a Pictionary-style game. “Conversation?” asked a class member. “Transition of care?” ventured another. The teacher gave the answer: The new reps had to keep commitments to consumers. That meant calling them back if needed.

 

With its Leap plans, Aetna is using many of the approaches that are gaining momentum in the industry. The Leap plans, which will roll out in four states this fall but are expected to be more widely available next year, rest on different technology than other Aetna products, including a new claims-processing platform, the company says.

 

“It’s a mammoth change in the offering, with everything being brand-new,” said Dijuana Lewis, an Aetna executive vice president. Aetna said this week it would likely lose money in 2015 on its exchange business.

 

The Leap insurance will include limited networks: In Arizona, it will be built around just one provider, the large Banner Health system. The Leap plans also aim to be easy to understand. For instance, they generally won’t include coinsurance, in which a consumer pays a percentage of the cost of a medical service, a concept many people find confusing.



And, as we now learn, all these changes and all this "simplification" will cost lots of money. In fact more money, than the tax actually brings in for most.

It appears that while US health insurers had modeled out their spike in revenue courtesy of Obamacare, not even they anticipated the associated costs the "Affordable" Care Act would entail.

That, however, is amazing, because while everyone else was worse off as a result of Obamacare, at least the conventional wisdom was that the insurers would make off like bandits. Not only is that not the case, but Obamacare - in a glorious example of how government meddling destroys everything - is actually leading to reduces profit margins for the one group that was supposed to be a sure winner!

However, since it is too late to undo Obamacare, what do these latest revelations mean?  According to the WSJ "now, a lot of insurers are recalibrating their approach for 2016, *with changes visible at all levels of the industry*—*from pricing to product design*."

Mostly pricing.

The WSJ reminds us that "premiums for a type of plan that is closely watched as a signal of consumer costs—the second-lowest-priced insurance product in the law’s “silver” metal tier—*will increase 7.5% on average across the roughly three dozen states that rely on the HealthCare.gov marketplace, *according to the administration."



For larger companies, the losses were survivable. *But rate increases create a risk that consumers may get sticker shock despite the availability of federal subsidies that reduce the cost sharply for many.*

Peter Wainwright, 63 years old, who retired from a telecommunications job, currently has a plan bought on California’s ACA marketplace. He and his wife don’t get a subsidy and pay about $2,230 a month, and the rate is increasing for 2016. “*Everything has gone up,” said Mr. Wainwright, of Half Moon Bay, Calif*.



The punchline:



*The health law remade the individual market, forcing insurers to sell plans to all consumers and banning them from charging rates based on health conditions. Insurers struggled to predict their costs, and many didn’t set rates high enough to cover the care of those they enrolled. *



And since the insurers care far more about boosting profits than merely rising revenues which are more than offset by rising costs, and since most insurers are losing money on existing plans, expect all the rate increases incurred so far to be a mere walk in the park compared to the stratospheric premium surges that are about to be unveiled and that would make even the infamous Martin Shkreli green with envy. Reported by Zero Hedge 8 hours ago.

PYA Webinar Addresses Antibiotic Stewardship for the LTC Community

$
0
0
Dr. J. Michael Keegan, infectious disease expert and leader of PYA’s antibiotic stewardship team, will guide long-term care facilities (LTCFs) through antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) preparedness planning during an upcoming webinar.

Knoxville, TN (PRWEB) November 03, 2015

Dr. J. Michael Keegan, an infectious disease expert and director of PYA’s antibiotic stewardship initiative, will present a webinar to guide long-term care facilities (LTCFs) through the processes necessary to effectively manage an impending government mandate. The one-hour webinar, “Is the Inevitable Antibiotic Stewardship Requirement on Your Horizon?” takes place at 12 noon EST on Wednesday, November 11, 2015.

In July 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed the first major rewrite of Conditions of Participation (CoPs) affecting the long-term care industry since 1991. Part of that proposal would require LTCFs to adopt antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) to cope with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the burgeoning danger they pose to every community.

The PYA webinar will provide key factors LTCFs can use to ensure preparedness for the impending requirements and will offer participants:· A stronger grasp of the nature of the antibiotic-resistance problem and its influence on public health and whole communities.
· Insight into the significance of antibiotic resistance for the LTCF sector.
· An understanding of how ASPs can improve patient care while reducing costs and advancing long-term economic benefit for your facility.

“For long-term care facilities, the integration of effective ASPs depends on education and preparation,” said Dr. Keegan. “This webinar will help in both respects, providing insight into how best to take advantage of critical and cost-effective services to ensure that long-term care facilities successfully navigate this important safety initiative.”

Well-known for his philosophy of “aggressive diagnostics and conservative therapeutics,”™ Dr. Keegan has more than 20 years of experience in the establishment, integration, and measurement of antibiotic programs within a multitude of healthcare settings. In addition to moderating this upcoming webinar, Dr. Keegan will serve as the moderator for the ABX CROSSROADS symposium, an inaugural dialogue featuring nationally and internationally esteemed speakers within the field of antimicrobial resistance countermeasures, to be held November 6, 2015.

To learn more, click "Upcoming Webinar Addresses Antibiotic Stewardship for the Long-Term Care Community"

About PYA
For over three decades, Pershing Yoakley & Associates (PYA), a national professional services firm providing management consulting and accounting has helped its clients navigate and derive value amid complex challenges related to regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, governance, business valuations and fair market value assessments, multi-unit business and clinical integrations, best practices, tax and assurance, business analysis, and operations optimization.

Founded in 1983, PYA’s steadfast commitment to an unwavering client-centric culture has served the firm’s clients well. PYA is now ranked by Modern Healthcare as the 9th largest privately owned healthcare consulting firm in the US. PYA is also ranked 103rd by INSIDE Public Accounting’s “Top 200” Largest Accounting Firms. PYA affiliate companies offer clients world-class data analytics, professional real estate development and advisory resources, self-insured employer health insurance claims audits for Fortune 500 companies, wealth management and retirement plan administration, and business transitions consulting.

PYA is headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee. For more information, please visit http://www.pyapc.com/ Reported by PRWeb 23 hours ago.

Chronic Care Management Survey: Some Initial Success, But Obstacles Remain

$
0
0
National healthcare consulting firm PYA and Enli Health Intelligence have released the results of a new national survey, providing insights into current chronic care management programs and informing future initiatives.

Knoxville, TN (PRWEB) November 03, 2015

There is significant interest in new Medicare reimbursement for chronic care management (CCM), with 26% of eligible providers having already launched CCM programs and another 23% intending to do so in the next 12 months. These early adopters, however, are struggling with (1) physician engagement, (2) patient education, (3) efficient processes, and (4) regulatory compliance.

These are some of the key findings of the National Chronic Care Management Survey 2015 released this week by PYA and Enli Health Intelligence. The survey offers new insights for providers and policy makers, as well as vendors offering products and services to support providers’ CCM programs.

“New Medicare reimbursement for CCM offers a bridge from volume-based to value-based reimbursement, as it provides fee-for-service revenue to support development of population health competencies,” said PYA Principal Martie Ross. “For a number of reasons, however, providers are finding it challenging to walk across that bridge.”

“While many had hoped that Medicare would simplify the CCM billing rules to encourage greater participation, the agency took no such action in the 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule released on October 30,” Ross continued. “Now, we need to address CCM challenges head on, to ensure patients suffering with chronic conditions have access to these vital services.”

The survey report, now available on the PYA website, addresses provider attitudes, intent, and experience with CCM program deployment including:·     Barriers and accelerators to adoption including program design, staffing, supportive technology, and participation in alternative payment models
·     The challenge of physician engagement and patient education
·     Actual time spent (in addition to the reimbursed 20 minutes), months billed, investments made, and expectations for economic return.

The survey results are based on 309 responses representative of 7,328 entities across enterprise and independently owned ambulatory clinics. The results achieved a 95% confidence level, with a confidence interval of +/- 5.5.

The National Provider Survey on CCM is the latest contribution to a growing library of resources from PYA, including the industry-leading white paper, Providing and Billing Medicare for Chronic Care Management, and subsequent Chronic Care Management Clinical Services Manual. Information for all of these and other reference tools, may be found on the PYA website.

PYA is a recognized industry leader in CCM support services, assisting organizations in developing effective and efficient CCM programs by translating complicated rules and regulations into practical, straightforward strategies. Enli Health Intelligence has been recognized by IDC Health Insights as the only healthcare IT company providing a complete technology solution for CCM.

** Special Note: Survey results to be presented in live Webinar on December 3 **
PYA and Enli will host a webinar on Thursday, December 3 to present the survey findings and their implications for healthcare providers. Those interested to attend can register at https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5442622510147143681.

---
About Enli
Enli Health Intelligence™ is the market leader in population health management technology. Enli enables care teams to perform to their full potential by integrating healthcare data with evidence-based guidelines embedded in provider workflows across the population and at the point of care.

For more information, please visit http://www.enli.net.

Enli Media Contact
Enli Health Intelligence
Erik Simshauser, 1 503-858-6094
Vice President, Marketing
esimshauser(at)enli.net

About PYA
For over three decades, Pershing Yoakley & Associates (PYA), a national healthcare consulting firm, has helped clients navigate and derive value amid complex challenges related to regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, governance, business valuations and fair market value assessments, multi-unit business and clinical integrations, best practices, tax and assurance, business analysis, and operations optimization.

PYA’s steadfast commitment to an unwavering client-centric culture has served the firm’s clients well. PYA is now ranked by Modern Healthcare as the nation’s 9th largest privately owned healthcare consulting firm. PYA affiliate companies offer clients world-class data analytics, professional real estate development and advisory resources for healthcare providers, self-insured employer health insurance claims audits for Fortune 500 companies, wealth management and retirement plan administration, and business transitions consulting.

For more information, please visit http://www.pyapc.com/ Reported by PRWeb 23 hours ago.

Hope For Heroes and USA Medical Card Partner to Make a Difference for Our Nation’s Veterans

$
0
0
Veterans Day pays tribute to veterans one day a year. Hope For Heroes and USA Medical Card have partnered to honor them every day, by providing programs that empower their independence.

Miramar Beach, FL (PRWEB) November 03, 2015

On November 11, Veterans Day, we commemorate those who have served our country. To help honor them every day, Hope For Heroes Foundation has partnered with USA Medical Card, a leading provider of free pharmacy discount cards, to help increase funding for programs that empower independence for our disabled military veterans and other heroes across the country, and help more people afford their prescriptions.

“Due to USA Medical Card's support, we can help more of our nation’s disabled veterans,” said Mitch Serlin, President of Hope For Heroes. “They need help healing, and deserve the opportunity to get back their healthy, active lifestyle, after having suffered debilitating injuries while serving our country. Our trips and outings provide a time to bond with other heroes, caregivers, family and friends.”

The pharmacy discount card benefiting Hope For Heroes, administered by USA Medical Card, is free and available to everyone. It is accepted at more than 60,000 pharmacies across the country—local, regional and national chains such as CVS, Costco, Target, Rite Aid, Walmart and Walgreens.

The pre-activated card reduces the cost of prescriptions by as much as 75%. Eligible Rx medications include those frequently prescribed for heart disease, hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes and other health conditions. It can be used by individuals to complement and help fill in gaps of their health insurance plans. Or, individuals without insurance can use the card to significantly reduce the cost of their medications. There are no prescriptions that are excluded from possible savings, brand name or generic. It is commonly used on Zolpidem, Amoxicillin, Lisinopril, Metformin and thousands of other popular medications.

“We are extremely proud to be partnered with Hope For Heroes, to help make a difference for our nation’s military veterans. This program not only allows people to save money on their prescriptions, it also helps our nation’s wounded heroes experience the personal accomplishment that can come from participating in the organization’s programs,” said USA Medical Card Co-Founder and President Jordan Sessler. “This sponsorship will help ensure more funds are available to help these heroes.”

To get a card benefiting Hope For Heroes, you can download one at http://www.HeroesHope.org/free-pharmacy-discount-card or text Heroes to 95577. This short video explains the advantages of the card: http://www.USAMedicalCard.com/video.

# # #

About Hope For Heroes
For more information about the Hope For Heroes Foundation, please visit http://www.heroeshope.org.

About USA Medical Card
For more information about USA Medical Card, please visit http://www.USAMedicalCard.com.

Media Inquiries: 1-914-629-0059 Reported by PRWeb 19 hours ago.

LGBT Rights, Pot And Medicaid On The Line In State And Local Races

$
0
0
The governor's race in Kentucky and a school-funding battle in Mississippi are among the top races Tuesday in what otherwise is a relatively low-key, off-year election cycle.

Just two states are holding elections for governor while three have general state legislative elections. Yet decisions made by voters in several cities and states could be an important bellwether of sentiment ahead of next year's presidential elections.

In Virginia, a swing state, Democrats are pushing to reverse a narrow Republican majority in the state Senate and empower Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe in negotiations with Republicans who control the state House.

Houston and Philadelphia are among cities selecting mayors, while Salt Lake City voters will choose between the incumbent and a challenger who seeks to become the first gay person elected mayor of Utah's capital.

Several city or state ballot initiatives will test voter preferences on school funding, marijuana, gay and lesbian rights, and the sharing economy.

Closely watched is the battle for Kentucky's open gubernatorial seat, which features a two-term Democratic attorney general who vows to maintain the state's Medicaid expansion and a Republican businessman looking to upend the political dynamic in a Southern state where Democrats still control statewide offices.

Republican Matt Bevin has been running as an outsider, wooing the state's conservative voters with a message of "vote your values and not your party." Democrat Jack Conway has been emphasizing his support for early education programs while saying that 400,000 people could lose taxpayer-funded health insurance if Bevin is elected. Also on the ballot is Drew Curtis, a businessman running as an independent.

The governor's race in Mississippi has been largely overshadowed by a fight over a constitutional amendment that would allow people to sue the state to increase funding for public schools. Critics say it would take budget decisions away from Mississippi lawmakers and give the courts too much power. The Legislature has put forward its own ballot measure that would prohibit "judicial enforcement" of school funding.

The outcome could prompt similar efforts in other states where education remains a key challenge for lawmakers as they look to balance their budgets with tax revenues that have yet to rebound to pre-recession levels.

Meanwhile, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, a Republican, appears on track for re-election. He faces political newcomer Robert Gray, a long-haul trucker who was the surprise winner of the Democratic primary.

In Houston, the nation's fourth-largest city, efforts to secure non-discrimination protections for gay and transgender people will face a key test. Now that same-sex marriage is legal, such laws have become a priority for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender groups. Opponents, including a coalition of conservative pastors, contend the measure infringes on their religious beliefs.

Houston voters also will chose from among 13 candidates to replace outgoing Mayor Annise Parker. In Philadelphia, Democrat Jim Kenney, a former city councilman, is considered the favorite to succeed Mayor Michael Nutter.

The Salt Lake City mayoral race features two-term incumbent Ralph Becker, one of Obama's appointees on a climate change task force, and former state lawmaker Jackie Biskupski. If Biskupski wins, she will be the city's first openly gay mayor.

Elsewhere, voters in Ohio will consider whether to allow the use of marijuana for recreational and medicinal use. San Francisco voters will decide a citizen-backed initiative to restrict the operations of Airbnb, the room-rental site, and a $310 million bond package for affordable housing.

In Washington state, a proposal backed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen would add state penalties for anyone who imports certain animal products for commercial purposes, such as elephant ivory or rhino horns.

And Colorado voters will decide what to do with $66 million in tax revenue generated from the sale of recreational marijuana. An existing state law requires excess tax revenue to be returned to taxpayers. A statewide initiative on Tuesday's ballot asks voters to make an exception with the marijuana revenue and direct it instead toward public education and drug-prevention programs.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 18 hours ago.

As Exchanges Open Enrollment Season, Consumers Ask More Insurance Questions

$
0
0
It's time for people to shop for health insurance and that means lots of confusion about about high-deductible plans, out-of-network benefits and premium increases. Reported by NPR 16 hours ago.

Technology Association of Oregon (TAO) Selects ZOOM+ Performance Health Insurance as Exclusive Health Plan for its Members

$
0
0
HILLSBORO, Ore., Nov. 3, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- ZOOM+, the innovator of on-demand healthcare and Performance Health Insurance, announced today that the Technology Association of Oregon (TAO) will make available ZOOM+ Performance Health Insurance to TAO member companies. The innovative... Reported by PR Newswire 16 hours ago.

​Harken Health Insurance Company to open six centers in Atlanta

$
0
0
Harken Health Insurance Company is opening six locations in Atlanta in January, an investment that is expected to top $1 million. By the time the centers open Jan. 1, the company will hire 75 to 80 in the area, and it plans to hire more over time. Harken Health offers competitively priced insurance paired with primary care in a membership-based model. Members get free primary care visits at its Health Centers and a personal Care Team available by phone, email, text or video chat 24 hours a day. Membership… Reported by bizjournals 15 hours ago.

The Affordable Care Act offers options to Americans planning for retirement

$
0
0
The Affordable Care Act offers options to Americans planning for retirement NEWARK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--For Americans who are interested in retiring but continue to work full-time just to bridge their medical benefits to Medicare, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) offers new health insurance options. By taking advantage of the health insurance options made available through the ACA, individuals can consider enhanced career flexibility later in life without having to worry about their health insurance in the same way as prior generations of early retirees, according to a Reported by Business Wire 16 hours ago.

The Fed’s Easy Money Has Created a Takeover Mania

$
0
0
The deals keep getting bigger…and one of the gravest financial warnings of 2015 keeps growing in relevance. Last month, legendary investor Carl Icahn publically warned that cheap money is fueling a bubble in dealmaking. Icahn said: …[W]hat [companies] do with the money is almost perverse. They just go in and buy another company to show analysts on Wall Street that earnings are going up, so their stock will go up and it's financial engineering at its height. Icahn is known for buying huge stakes in “broken” companies…taking a seat on the board…and trying to turn the companies around. He knows more than almost anyone about buying companies. •  Last week, we were reminded of Icahn’s warning... On Thursday, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer (PFE) revealed plans to buy drugmaker Allergan PLC (AGN). Pfizer is the 12th-largest publicly-traded U.S. company. It’s worth $213 billion. Allergan is another huge drug company. It’s worth $123 billion. If the deal goes through, it would create the sixth-largest publicly-traded company in the U.S. The new company would dethrone Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) as the world’s largest healthcare company. Pfizer-Allergan would be biggest deal in a monster year for mergers and acquisitions. On Sunday, Financial Times said 2015 is shaping up to be the biggest year ever for global dealmaking: With close to $4tn worth of deals already announced this year, 2015 is on track to beat the all-time record of 2007, when the credit bubble helped generate $4.3tn worth of transactions. •  Pfizer has already made a big acquisition this year... In September, Pfizer completed its $15 billion purchase of pharmaceutical company Hospira. Pfizer’s management hopes these deals will help the company start growing again. Pfizer’s annual sales have declined, for the last four years, by an average of 6.5% per year. If management’s track record is any indication, the acquisition of Allergan won’t create value for Pfizer’s shareholders. Since 2000, Pfizer has spent more than $235 billion buying other companies. However, Pfizer is only worth $213 billion today. Pfizer isn’t the only company in the healthcare sector making big deals. Last week, Financial Times reported global healthcare companies have announced $850 billion worth of deals this year. In July, health insurance company Anthem (ANTM) agreed to buy rival Cigna (CI) for $48.3 billion. The deal will create the nation’s largest health insurer. And last Tuesday, pharmacy chain Walgreens (WBA) bought rival Rite Aid (RAD) for $17 billion. It was a pricey acquisition…Walgreens paid more than a 50% premium to Rite Aid’s share price, and 21 times Rite Aid’s book value. •  Record low interest rates are driving the massive increase in dealmaking… During the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve dropped its key interest rate to effectively zero. The Fed has held rates near zero ever since. Seven years of zero percent rates have made it ridiculously cheap to borrow money. Many companies have used this as an opportunity to buy out competitors with borrowed money. According to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, U.S. corporations borrowed a record of $1.2 trillion in the bond market through the first nine months of 2015. •  Buying a competitor can boost sales and profits… But Carl Icahn notes the “high” usually wears off quick. Last month, Icahn said buying a company with borrowed money was like “taking a drug.” It can cause sales and profits to jump, but the benefit usually only lasts a year or two. Icahn says U.S. companies are buying up rivals to goose their earnings numbers. He says this is masking major problems in corporate America. And the facts back up his claim… Last week, The Wall Street Journal explained how U.S. business investment has stalled since the financial crisis: Business investment in the real economy is weak. While U.S. gross domestic product rose 8.7% from late 2007 through 2014, gross private investment was a mere 4.3% higher. Growth in nonresidential fixed investment remains substantially lower than the last six post-recession expansions. Instead of investing to build their businesses, companies are taking a shortcut to growth by buying other companies. In July, Forbes reported that 54% of CEOs in the U.S. plan to complete an acquisition by the end of the year. •  Earnings growth has been sluggish… Earnings for companies in the S&P 500 have only grown 6.9% annually since 2011. That’s far less than during past economic expansions, according to The Wall Street Journal. Earnings grew 12.9% per year between 2003 and 2007. They grew at 11% per year between 1995 and 1999... As of Friday, 340 companies in the S&P 500 reported third-quarter results. So far, earnings have declined 2.2% from last year. We can’t know for sure until all the results are in, but it appears that earnings will decline overall this quarter. If that happens, research firm FactSet says it will be the first time since 2009 that earnings have declined two quarters in a row. If you’ve been listening to Icahn’s warnings, this bad earnings news shouldn’t be a surprise. Instead of investing in their businesses, companies are using cheap money and financial engineering to boost profits. That can work for a while. But once the “high” wears off, you’re left within shrinking profits and no growth. Chart of the Day Don’t buy into the “recovery” hype... Today’s chart shows the number of people enrolled in the U.S. federal food stamp program. As you might expect, the number of people on food stamps surged during the financial crisis. However, food stamp usage kept rising through 2013. More than forty million Americans are still on food stamps today, nearly double the pre-crisis number. This isn’t what a healthy, growing economy looks like.     Reported by Proactive Investors 14 hours ago.

Montana Becomes 30th State To Expand Medicaid

$
0
0
An estimated 70,000 Montanans are newly eligible for health insurance coverage. Reported by IBTimes 14 hours ago.

Public Health: Health Insurance and the States: A Closer Look

$
0
0
Responding to reader comments on our effort to map the uninsured. Reported by NYTimes.com 11 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images