Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Zane Benefits Publishes New Information on Value-Based Benefits Design (VBBD)

$
0
0
VBBD is a Comprehensive Approach to Helping Employees Be Healthier, and Save the Company Money on Health Insurance Premiums

Park City, Utah (PRWEB) January 26, 2014

Today, Zane Benefits, the #1 online health benefits solution, published new information on Value-Based Benefits Design (VBBD).

According to Zane Benefits’ website, one of the big trends of 2014 is Value-Based Benefits Design (VBBD). While VBBD has been an employee health benefits strategy since the early 1990's, the associated cost savings with the approach are gaining more attention now.

VBBD is a comprehensive approach to helping employees be healthier, which in turn helps the company save money on health insurance premiums. VBBD addresses the way health benefits are structured and utilized by employees. The focus is broader than just the health insurance design and usually includes other types of incentives.

According to Zane Benefits’ website, the goal with VBBD is to manage the most expensive health conditions to bring them down out of the most expensive category, and keep the healthy people healthy so they don’t move into that expensive category.

Click here to read the full article..

--

About Zane Benefits
Zane Benefits, the #1 Online Health Benefits Solution, was founded in 2006 to revolutionize the way employers provide employee health benefits in America. We empower employees to take control over their own healthcare, while helping employers recruit and retain the best talent. Our online solutions allow small and medium-sized businesses to successfully transition to a health benefits program that creates happier employees, reduces costs and frees up more time to serve their customers. For more information about ZaneHealth, visit http://www.zanebenefits.com. Reported by PRWeb 8 hours ago.

What Is the Real State of the Union?

$
0
0
What Is the Real State of the Union? On Tuesday, Jan. 28, President Barack Obama will address Congress and the nation in his annual State of the Union address. Confidence in Obama's leadership has faded to such a degree that people are losing interest in anything he says or does. Veteran political observers--even former presidential speechwriters!--are complaining about having to watch a speech that in recent years has become boring, repetitive, and cynically ideological.

As he has done in previous years, President Obama plans to use his State of the Union to launch a political campaign. This time, his theme will be inequality--the same tired nonsense Americans have been suffering since the Occupy Wall Street movement, and long before. Instead of an honest assessment of the country's present situation, the president will once again offer a Dickensian vision of a society torn between haves and have-nots.

Inequality has become worse on President Obama's watch, for the simple reason that his policies--especially Obamacare--have slowed economic growth and job creation, while the Federal Reserve's $85-billion-per-month monetary stimulus has largely flowed into Wall Street, enriching those who had money already. Those around Washington, DC and with connections to government contracts have done well. Few others have done as well.

If the president were to address the real State of the Union--without the focus-group-tested phrases and rhetorical straw men--then he could offer a sobering yet upbeat description of a country that is still in trouble but is better placed to succeed than it has been in many years. With a clear view of the challenges, and the right policy changes to address them, President Obama could deliver a State of the Union worth remembering.

*The Economy*

The country's unemployment rate has fallen, and the stock market hit record highs last year. Yet the number of people dropping out of the workforce entirely is a sign that we have not really recovered from the financial crisis of 2007-8. We are at risk of becoming a European-style economy, with a large welfare state and persistent high unemployment. A generation of youth stands at risk of losing their chance to start on the economic ladder.

Yet there is one bright spark: energy. The discovery and development of shale oil deposits, and the growing use of tracking technology to produce natural gas, are lowering energy prices and creating thousands of new jobs. We have just surpassed Saudi Arabia as the world's leading oil producer, and we are lowering our own carbon emissions in the process by burning cleaner fuels. This is an achievement to celebrate--and to build upon.

The irony is that our energy success came in spite of government, not because of it. The Obama presidency has done all it can to slow fossil fuel development on federal lands and offshore, and has stalled in approving the Keystone XL pipeline. It has, instead, shoveled federal cash to wasteful "green energy" investments that often enjoyed the patronage of the political elite but provided little benefit to taxpayers or the environment.

The answer is to expand the growth of the energy industry throughout the nation by lifting restrictions on oil and gas development, especially on federal lands and offshore, and also approving the Keystone XL pipeline to bring Canada's oil south. Government has a role to play, ensuring that there are no repeats of disasters like the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Yet government can no longer stand in the way of such vast prosperity.

*Obamacare*

The rollout of Obamacare has confirmed what many of the policy's critics said from the start: that regardless of its good intentions, there was no way the federal government could administer a health insurance system for a nation of over 300 million people. Instead of focusing narrowly on helping the uninsured, the government tried to change everyone's insurance, with the result that many more people are actually losing their insurance today.

The federal Obamacare exchange, and many of the state exchanges, are a useful lesson in the hubris and futility of big government. President Obama's approach has been to resist legislative changes, for fear that they would open the door to repeal. Instead, he has made adjustments by fiat. That has undermined confidence in the rule of law. And his broken promise that people could keep the insurance they liked has hurt their trust.

The answer is to scrap Obamacare and start over with a new system--one that keeps a few of the benefits that Obamacare has introduced, such as coverage for pre-existing conditions, but which otherwise reverses the great error that was pushed through Congress, against wide popular disapproval, in 2010. A new system should focus on moving away from a third-party-payer system and give individuals more control over their health spending.

That means expanding the use of Health Savings Accounts, not limiting them. It means allowing people to buy insurance across state lines. And it means shifting to a system of premium support for Medicare, which would allow people to choose private insurance. The uninsured could be protected through a system of high-risk pools and cross-subsidization. And the tort system should be reformed to reduce the cost and risk of medial lawsuits.

*Deficits and Debt*

The national debt continues to climb because the federal government persists with a pattern of deficit spending that is slowly undermining our economic health, our global leadership, and our future. The reason we are forced to face a confrontation over the debt ceiling every few months is not because of the Tea Party but because the country's political leaders, as a whole, fail every time to deal with the spending that is the core of the problem.

There is good news and bad news. The good news is that we have actually cut government spending for the first time in consecutive years since the end of the Korean War, thanks to the "sequester"--a law that nobody wanted. There is more: the House and Senate are working together to pass new budgets. But there is bad news: the price of that cooperation is that we have partially undone the "sequester" and are spending again.

The problem with the sequester was not the amount of cuts but their composition. We should never have made defense spending equivalent to other discretionary spending. Defense is the first priority of government, and we face rising challenges around the world, even as we wind down ongoing wars. We have to focus on streamlining our spending elsewhere, and getting rid of programs--even whole departments--that provide little of real value.

Ultimately, the only real way to solve our deficits and debts is to address our entitlement programs. We need to raise the retirement age for Social Security and slowly move the system towards a real savings program, rather than a tax on today's workers for today's retirees. We need to make the Medicare changes described earlier and move the model towards individual insurance rather than one-size-fits-all care whose cost is unsustainable.

*Freedom at Home*

The past year saw a proliferation of scandals that, taken together, undermined faith in our government. The use of the IRS to persecute particular groups remains an outrage. The abuse of prosecutorial powers to investigate the media was a blow to press freedom. The surveillance programs of the National Security Administration did little to protect us from attack and raised doubts about our government's commitment to the Constitution.

In addition, the continued, excessive use of executive orders, executive powers and executive privilege to do what Congress would not otherwise permit or condone has undermined the basic founding compact of the nation. When the president threatens the democratically elected legislature, saying "I've got a pen," he does little to enhance his own stature but much to undermine faith in his leadership and the rule of law itself.

Fear of accountability is the one thing that holds government in check. When that fear fades, the potential for great errors grows. That is why the Benghazi terror attack happened, and why our government lied to America about it. We need a select committee in Congress to investigate Benghazi once and for all, naming names and holding this administration accountable the way Congress could not, and the press would not, at the time.

We also need to scrap the new Treasury rules that would legalize the kind of abuses that the IRS carried out against the Tea Party and other conservative groups. It is also time to end the special protection enjoyed by the Department of Justice, whether in hiding the documents relating to Operation Fast and Furious, or encouraging it to sue states for adopting legitimate voter ID laws, educational reforms, and immigration enforcement tools.

*Global Freedom*

Our foreign policy is a mess. With the sole exception of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where our intervention can do little good, we are withdrawing from the world, leaving it a more unstable and less free place. We do a very poor job of advocating for our interests, much less our ideals. And we are abandoning our allies, allowing our enemies and rivals to reshape a new global order that will leave humanity less prosperous and secure.

We need a new approach that focuses squarely on strategic goals. In the Middle East, our goal must be simple: ending the threat of a nuclear Iran. We should pass the new bipartisan sanctions that will take effect if Iran tries to cheat on the deal, and we must insist that the ultimate goal of talks is a dismantlement of the regime's nuclear program. We should also support opposition efforts in that country to replace the Iranian regime itself.

In Asia, we must return to our traditional postwar goal of protecting free trade and the safeguarding the small states of the Western Pacific. Trade with China remains vital for both sides, but we cannot allow that trade to come along with militant Chinese expansionism. We will keep the sea lanes open in the Indian Ocean as well as the Pacific, and we will support democratic allies like India as a bulwark against instability in Central Asia.

In Europe, we should do more to strengthen the nations of Eastern Europe and counteract new pressures from Russia, which seeks to bring newly free countries back under its control. We should make clear to the Ukrainian government that we will not tolerate violent suppression of democratic protest, for example. And in Africa, we should work more closely with the most stable democratic countries to create launching pads for growth.

*Unity in Diversity*

Americans are more divided today than when President Obama took office, promising to bring us together. That is not only an economic reality, but a social and political one. It is also largely a result of his rhetoric and his policies. From the "99 percent" to the Travyon Martin controversy, he and his administration have seized almost every opportunity to divide the country so as to excite the Democrats' voter base before Election Day.

One result is that the various states have moved in dramatically different directions, on social and economic issues. Blue states have become bluer and red states redder. We are witnessing an experiment in governance, a test of whether higher taxes and powerful unions produce better outcomes than limited government. And we can see the results: states that choose reform are creating more jobs, growing faster, and balancing their books.

It is time to learn from states like Wisconsin, which turned a $3.6 billion deficit into a surplus of $1 billion--and began its recovery by lowering corporate taxes. And it is time to let states choose their own path on social issues, whether gay marriage, abortion, or drug enforcement. We can learn from what works in the states--or what does not--and apply those lessons on the federal level. That is a great strength of our national diversity.

America's great diversity also proves the enduring strength of our nation's founding principles, which every new generation of citizens--born and naturalized--has embraced. We weaken those principles when we imagine we must compromise the rule of law for the sake of tolerance or growth. In fact, equality before the law is the best kind of equality, the true arc towards which our path through history bends. We must restore that as our goal.

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 7 hours ago.

Second look at socialized lawyers?

$
0
0
Further to yesterday's point about how a complicated mass of laws can be used to smack down citizens who find themselves in violation of rules they never knew existed, conservative writer Mark Steyn has been embroiled in a years-long legal battle with Dr. Michael Mann, inventor of the phony "hockey stick" graph that has been so integral to the Church of Global Warming's theology.  

Steyn, laboring under the mistaken impression that Americans have some sort of "freedom of speech," wrote something Mann decided was insulting.  The global warming movement's propensity to "win" arguments by suppressing dissent led to a grueling, fantastically expensive courtroom struggle... or, really, more of a courtroom pre-struggle, because after years of work and over a million dollars in total legal expenses, they're essentially still arguing over whether to have the actual trial at all.  Among other darkly amusing episodes in this farce was Mann falsely claiming to be a Nobel laureate, and suggesting that insulting a Nobel laureate was inherently worse than saying something bad about lesser creatures, as though Nobel prizes emit some sort of radiation that dissolves the First Amendment on contact.

Steyn discusses the history of the case here.  As he often remarks, "the process is the punishment." He made it this far through the process because he had the support of the magazine he wrote for, National Review, but now the case (and some subsequent comments Steyn made about it) have caused a rift between the writer and his publisher.  He's on his own from here on out, which has led him to contemplate the long-resisted step of opening a legal defense fund.  

While discussing that possibility in a post on Saturday night, he quotes a remarkable statistic from Conrad Black: "The US has 5 percent of the world's population, 25 percent of the world's incarcerated people, and 50 percent of the world's lawyers, who invoice almost 10 percent of US GDP (around $1.4 trillion annually.)

How often have we heard such statistical comparisons offered as one of the reasons we had to nationalize the health insurance industry?  (You'll very soon be hearing the even worse percentages consumed on health insurance due to the failure of ObamaCare as a reason for fully nationalizing medicine itself.)  It's risky to do anything significant in America without expensive legal representation.  You really need to pay for that legal protection in advance, hiring a law firm to advise you on everything you do or say - lest you find yourself abruptly hauled into court for, say, improperly bundling a laughably small amount of money for a friend's nearly-hopeless political campaign.  You really want to pay some lawyers to review every square inch of your paperwork first, so you don't get busted for doing 59 in a 55-mph campaign-finance zone in your little compact car, while huge semi trucks full of political cash blast past you at a hundred miles an hour without the cops batting an eye.

Where are the calls to offer Americans relief from the excessive burden of legal costs, which is currently gobbling up ten percent of our national Gross Domestic Product?  Where's Barack Obama to castigate those greedy lawyers, the way he once accused doctors of being tonsil-thieving profiteers?  

Of course, we don't want to fully nationalize the legal profession, because we know what would happen: legal fees would eat up even more of our GDP, but now the lawyers would be "free," paid with bags of freshly printed deficit cash, which would become part of the nation's vast, featureless porridge of debt, which would sour into inescapable demands for higher taxes when the socialists decided to slip on their absurd "deficit hawk" costumes in a few years.  But lack of access to affordable legal care is clearly hurting Americans, especially those with pre-existing legal conditions.  I can't think of many ObamaCare arguments that couldn't be easily adapted into a case for strict mandates to bring those costs down.

Or, of course, we could simply reduce the size of government and the crushing burden of our legal code.  But that's just crazy talk, right?

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 7 hours ago.

Ted Cruz: President Obama, Democrats Shut Down The Government Last Fall

$
0
0
Ted Cruz: President Obama, Democrats Shut Down The Government Last Fall Ted Cruz: President Obama, Democrats Shut Down The Government Last Fall
Politics

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, argued on CBS Sunday that the government shutdown in October was not caused by the Republican party, but by Democrats and President Barack Obama.

"I think it was a mistake that President Obama and the Democrats shut the government down this fall," Cruz told "Face the Nation."

"The reason they did so is that President Obama dug in and said he wouldn't compromise and he wouldn't negotiate,” he said.

He insisted that Obama and Sen. Majority Leader Harry M. Reid, D-Nev., threatened and utimately caused the shutdown because they were unwilling to negotiate.

"I didn't threaten to shut down the government the last time," Cruz said. "I don't think we should ever shut down the government."

CBS host Bob Schieffer scoffed at Cruz.

“Senator, I know what Republicans were telling me, like John Boehner, who said this was a disaster and never again,” Schieffer said.

In October, Cruz and other Tea Party leaders refused to fund the government if the funding for the Affordable Care Act was not eliminated.

He called for the President to apologize for Obamacare in his State of the Union address and said Obama’s policies are driving income inequality.

“One of the things President Obama really ought to do is look in the TV camera and say to the over 5 million Americans all across this country who’ve had their health insurance canceled because of Obamacare, to look in the camera and say, `I’m sorry. I told you if you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it. I told you if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. And that wasn’t true. I’m sorry,’” Cruz said.

He also said he supports New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

“I think he is brash and outspoken, and I think it’s terrific that he’s been able to get elected twice as a Republican in a very blue state. I think it’s unfortunate he’s found himself in this mess, and I hope he can extricate himself. I’m certainly rooting for him to do so, because I think he’s an effective leader and I’d like to see him move on to governing New Jersey and not being mired in this scandal,” he said.

Cruz wouldn’t give a straight answer as to whether he is considering a run for president in 2016.

He just reiterated a familiar Cruz talking-point, “My focus is standing and fighting right now in the senate to bring back jobs and economic growth. Economic growth is my number one priority.”

Sources: Dallas Morning News, Washington Post

1 Reported by Opposing Views 1 hour ago.

Health Law Is Tricky For Parents Of Medicaid Children

$
0
0
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Some parents shopping for health insurance through the new federal marketplace are running into trouble when their children might be eligible for Medicaid but they are not.

Children who qualify for Medicaid, the safety-net program for the poor and disabled, can't be included on subsidized family plans purchased through the federal marketplace, a fact that is taking many parents by surprise and causing confusion and problems for others. A California man says he was given false assurances that his children could be covered by the same plan he picked for his wife and himself, and a Florida father says his daughter is going without coverage while he waits for answers. In New Hampshire, some parents who've enrolled in private plans for themselves are finding out later that their children aren't eligible for Medicaid after all, leaving the kids with no options. "The children are getting stuck in this spot where we've enrolled the parent, but we can't bring the children back on the family plan," Maria Proulx, senior legal counsel for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Hampshire, told a state advisory board panel this month.

The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services declined to say how the system is supposed to work for families and what problems have emerged. But a regional manager for CMS acknowledged the problem at the same New Hampshire meeting and said the agency is working on it, as did Proulx in a later interview.

"This is an important issue, and we're not taking it lightly," she said. "Even if this impacts only one family ... it's a big deal and we want to get it resolved as quickly as possible."

The federal government sets minimum guidelines for Medicaid eligibility, but states can choose to expand coverage beyond that. In some states, parents must have significantly lower incomes to gain Medicaid coverage for themselves than they would to get coverage for just their children, either through Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program — also known as CHIP — the low-income health insurance program for children who don't qualify for Medicaid.

In North Port, Fla., Russell Clouden was thrilled to find a better, cheaper family plan through the new marketplace, then stunned to realize his 14-year-old daughter wouldn't be enrolled because she might qualify for Florida Healthy Kids, the state's version of CHIP. The federal government still hasn't transferred roughly 90,000 Medicaid files over to Florida officials, including Clouden's daughter's, so she still doesn't have insurance.

"Based on your income, they'll separate your kids from your primary policy and they shift them off to Medicaid or Healthy Kids and there's no way you can bring them back," said Clouden, 53, who runs a restaurant franchise. His daughter is an accomplished equestrian jumper who competes around the state.

"I'm kind of in limbo with her because I'm just hoping she doesn't get injured or sick," he said. "Without insurance, you've kind of got a knot in your stomach watching her jumping."

Insurance broker Matthew Dinkel in Fort Myers, Fla., said he has about 15 clients in Clouden's position.

"I have worried parents literally calling and texting me every day asking for an update," said Dinkel. "They canceled their old plans that covered their entire family and now they have coverage but their kids don't."

Jessica Waltman of the National Association of Health Underwriters said her group has raised the problem, and others, with federal officials and asked for a dedicated hotline or email address for insurance brokers to get answers.

"It's a nationwide issue that we've heard time and again, and it could have very significant coverage issues for families," she said.

Marc Jobin, a construction consultant in southern New Hampshire, said the process has been so confusing, he's put off a decision for himself, his wife and their two children, even though he's seen premiums that are significantly lower than what they pay now.

"We've been hesitating for two months now because the information is not clear," he said. "Around the holidays, we were thinking, 'let's do this, let's sign up,' and then the latest problem is now our children will probably be thrown into the state health care system, but nobody knows what that means."

Mary Ann Cooney, associate commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, urged those awaiting Medicaid decisions to call their state offices directly. She said her office has been getting incomplete application information from the federal government, making it harder to contact people to determine their Medicaid eligibility, but situations are improving and the office is reaching out to hundreds of people each day.

"There's a real light at the end of the tunnel," she said.

But in the meantime, children are going without coverage. In California, Robert Clark said when he applied by phone through the Covered California marketplace, he was assured that his two children would be on the plan he picked. But he later got separate notices from the insurance company and Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program.

He called Covered California again and was told the person he'd previously talked to there was wrong and that his children had to be enrolled in Medi-Cal. Clark, the president of a Menlo Park technology company, doesn't like that prospect because the doctors his children have seen since their births don't take Medicaid.

"It's pretty frustrating," he said. "We've probably spent several days' worth of time on hold."

Instead, he's exploring whether he can enroll his children in individual, unsubsidized plans through Covered California. He recently found out his original application was "hung up," so he plans to resubmit a fresh application, but in the meantime has lost out on coverage for January.

"My daughter is in gymnastics," he said. "If she falls on her head, we need to be covered."

___

Associated Press Writer Kelli Kennedy in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., contributed to this report. Reported by Huffington Post 4 hours ago.

Health law tricky for parents of Medicaid kids; chance of getting stuck in the system raises concerns

$
0
0
Some parents shopping for health insurance through the new federal marketplace are running into trouble when their children... Reported by Deseret News 3 hours ago.

Health law tricky for parents of Medicaid kids

$
0
0
Families shopping for health insurance through the new federal marketplace are running into trouble getting everyone covered when children are eligible for Medicaid but their parents are not. Reported by ajc.com 1 hour ago.

House to review insurance, cyberbullying bills

$
0
0
Maryland's House of Delegates will likely vote Tuesday on a plan to help residents who have struggled with the state's health insurance exchange online. Reported by WTOP 10 hours ago.

IPA Family, LLC Seeks to Fill Area and Regional Leadership Roles in North Carolina and South Carolina

$
0
0
Health insurance career opportunities with IPA are now available in select markets, and qualified candidates have the ability to participate in wealth accumulation plan.

Tampa, FL (PRWEB) January 27, 2014

Due to record-breaking growth, IPA Family, LLC (IPA), an American Independence Corp. company and member of The IHC Group, is pleased to announce that additional business opportunities are now available nationwide. To accommodate this surge, IPA hopes to fill area and regional leadership positions in select markets as soon as possible.

IPA President and Chief Operating Officer David Keeler attributes the company’s strong performance to its integrity-driven sales force and leadership team. “For us it is about serving others while earning significant wealth for today, tomorrow, and well into retirement,” Mr. Keeler said. “At IPA you have a true opportunity to be in business for yourself but not by yourself.”

Qualified candidates will possess the following skill-set: a minimum three years of industry experience and current possession of a life, accident, and health insurance license; decision-making and problem-solving abilities; active listening skills; critical thinking skills; experience influencing and motivating sales teams; sales experience; strong time-management skills; and a highly ethical predisposition. Selected candidates will be provided with a complete and comprehensive leadership package that promotes their personal and professional success.

This leadership package includes, but is not limited to, the following:
➢    Compensation programs with overwrites
➢    Residual income and monthly bonuses
➢    Lifetime vesting schedules
➢    Wealth accumulation plan
➢    Free sales leads and lead-management systems
➢    Ongoing training and business education using state-of-the art technologies
➢    Many other performance-based programs and incentives

“We believe integrity is the first step to true greatness. At IPA, honesty and integrity come above everything else. They are the core values of our company, and are the most important assets we have,” said Roxanne Huggins, who currently serves on IPA’s board of directors and leads its Heartland Center of Excellence as Area Performance Leader.

To be considered for one of the select area or regional leadership positions and participate in a professional and confidential interview process, please direct inquiries with resume to IPA Family, LLC through their website contact page.

Due to a culture of continuous growth and market expansions, IPA is currently accepting inquiries for existing and new markets. For more information about IPA Family and the companies it represents, visit http://www.ipafamily.com or call 800-772-8667 and indicate you saw our press release.

About IPA Family, LLC (IPA)
IPA Family, LLC is a national marketing organization that distributes major medical insurance plans and other health insurance plans and consumer benefit association membership programs across the nation. IPA’s trained professional sales associates, referred to as the “IPA Family,” provides information and a product portfolio that can meet the needs of most small business owners and self-employed individuals and families. Headquartered in Tampa, Fl., IPA is accredited and has an excellent reputation with the Better Business Bureau (bbb.org) and is a member company of The IHC Group.

About American Independence Corp.
AMIC, through Independence American Insurance Company and its other subsidiaries, offers pet insurance, non-subscriber occupational accident, international coverages, and short-term medical. AMIC provides to the individual and self-employed markets health insurance and related products, which are distributed through its subsidiaries IPA Family, LLC, healthinsurance.org, LLC, IPA Direct, Inc. and IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc. AMIC markets medical stop-loss through its marketing and administrative company IHC Risk Solutions, LLC.

About The IHC Group
The IHC Group is an organization of insurance carriers and marketing and administrative affiliates that has been providing life, health, disability, medical stop-loss and specialty insurance solutions to groups and individuals for over 30 years. Members of The IHC Group include Independence Holding Company (NYSE:IHC), American Independence Corp. (NASDAQ: AMIC), Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York, Madison National Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Independence American Insurance Company. Each insurance carrier in The IHC Group has a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) from A.M. Best Company, Inc., a widely recognized rating agency that rates insurance companies on their relative financial strength and ability to meet policyholder obligations. (An A++ rating from A.M. Best is its highest rating.) Collectively, the companies in The IHC Group provide insurance coverage to more than one million individuals and groups. For more information about The IHC Group, visit http://www.ihcgroup.com. Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Negative View Of Obamacare Rollout Eases: AP Poll

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — Memo to the White House: The website may be fixed, but President Barack Obama's new health insurance markets have yet to win over most consumers.

Negative perceptions of the health care rollout have eased, a new Associated Press-GfK poll finds. But overall, two-thirds of Americans say things still aren't going well. Of those who've tried to sign up, or who live with someone who has, 71 percent have encountered problems. But the share reporting success jumped to 40 percent from a meager 24 percent in December.

"Everything is not perfect; it takes time to work out the glitches," said Carol Lyles, a homecare provider from Los Angeles who was able to get coverage as a result of the law. "If done right, I believe it will provide the services that are needed."

The poll comes with about 60 days left in open enrollment season. The administration is playing catch-up to meet its goal of signing up 7 million people in new insurance exchanges that offer subsidized private coverage to middle-class households. So far, the markets have attracted an older crowd that tends to be more costly to cover. Younger people in the coveted 18-34 age group are still mainly on the sidelines.

While the poll did not find a turnaround for "Obamacare," the trend offers some comfort for supporters of the health care law.

In December, 76 percent of adults had said the opening of the new markets was not going well. Such negative perceptions have now fallen 10 points to 66 percent.

Still, rave reviews remain rare.

Only 4 percent said things were going extremely or very well, while another 17 percent said things were going somewhat well.

Compare that to 38 percent who said the rollout had gone not at all well. Another 28 percent said things were not going too well. Add those together and it makes up two-thirds of the public.

"People were locked out of the system," said Karyle Knowles, a restaurant server from San Antonio. "They weren't able to access what they should have, which only added to the mayhem."

The White House had hoped to bring the ease of online shopping to the daunting process of buying health insurance. Instead, the federal website serving 26 states froze up when it was launched Oct. 1. Some of the 14 states running their own sites also encountered problems. It took the better part of two months to straighten out the issues with the federal exchange.

The administration reported Friday that 3 million people have now signed up for private coverage through federal and state markets, and another 6.3 million have been deemed eligible for Medicaid coverage. It's not clear how many of those were previously uninsured.

According to the poll, many website users have had a frustrating experience. Among those who've tried to sign up, just 8 percent say it worked well, 29 percent somewhat well, 53 percent not well.

The public's take on the law itself is stable, with 27 percent saying they back it, 42 percent opposed and 30 percent neutral. Those figures are unchanged since December.

People who have tried to sign up are more positive than the overall public — 46 percent say they back the law, 31 percent oppose it.

But among the uninsured generally, there's a more even divide, with 30 percent saying they support the law while 33 percent oppose it.

The major elements of the health care law took effect with the new year. Virtually all Americans are now required to get covered or risk fines. Insurers can no longer turn away people with health problems. And the exchanges are open for business.

Enrollment in the Medicaid safety-net program is also rising. That's partly because of a program expansion accepted by about half the states and partly as a consequence of previously eligible but unenrolled people now forced to comply with the law's individual coverage mandate. Last week, Utah's Republican Gov. Gary Herbert said his state plans to become the 26th to accept the expansion.

The AP-GfK Poll was conducted Jan. 17-21 using KnowledgePanel, GfK's probability-based online panel designed to be representative of the U.S. population. It involved online interviews with 1,060 adults, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points for the full sample.

Respondents were first selected randomly using phone or mail survey methods, and were later interviewed online. People selected for KnowledgePanel who didn't otherwise have access to the Internet were provided with the ability to access the Internet at no cost.

___

AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Survey: Women Say Attractive Men Drive Black Ford Pickup Trucks

$
0
0
New Insure.com survey also finds that attractive women drive red BMW sports cars.

Foster City, Calif. (PRWEB) January 27, 2014

This Valentine’s Day, those who need dates might find help at the local car dealership. A survey by Insure.com asked men and women to rank the kind of vehicles driven by attractive members of the opposite sex. Respondents ranked styles of car, make and color.

When No. 1 rankings for each category are combined, results show that:·     Women say attractive men tend to drive black Ford pickup trucks.
·     The least attractive men drive mail trucks.
·     Men say attractive women tend to drive red BMW sports cars.
·     The least attractive women drive green minivans.

Women ranked these styles as cars that attractive men drive:

·     Pickup trucks: 32%
·     Sports cars: 27%
·     SUVs: 16%
·     Sedans: 11%
·     Hybrid or electric: 9%
·     UPS truck: 4%
·     Minivans: 2%
·     Mail truck: 1%

“A full-size truck implies that you can fix a leaky pipe. Regular $100 fill-ups suggest that you’re not money-obsessive. And regular $100 fill-ups also suggest that you regularly have $100,” said Amy Danise, editorial director of Insure.com.

The top makes of car for attractive men, as ranked by women, were Ford (16%), Chevrolet (13%) and Porsche (11%).

“The tag line for the new Ford F-150 is ‘tougher, smarter and more capable,’ which coincidentally would make a great Match.com profile,” observed Danise.

Women overwhelmingly chose black (53%) as the color of car driven by good-looking men, followed by silver (16%) and red (13%).

More than one-third of men envision good-looking chicks in sports cars. Here’s how men ranked car styles for attractive women:

·     Sports cars: 39%
·     Sedans: 22%
·     SUVs: 20%
·     Pickup trucks: 10%
·     Hybrid or electric vehicle: 6%
·     Minivans: 4%

Ladies: Get out the checkbook. The top three makes of car driven by attractive women, as ranked by men, were BMW (16%), Mercedes-Benz (14%) and Porsche (10%). The top colors were red (40%), black (23%) and silver (14%).

“Based on results, I’d recommend a red BMW Z4 for single women,” said Danise. “Two seats signal ‘no kids.’ The fact that it’s expensive means it’s probably leased, which indicates you’re not heavily into commitment. The convertible top says you’re not worried about your hair.”

But a few miscalculations can destroy a driver’s appeal. The top three turn-offs for both men and women were:

1.    Cigarette butts in the ashtray.
2.    Trash on the seats.
3.    Playing bad loud music.

See the full article, with more survey results, at http://www.insure.com/car-insurance/cars-that-attract-ladies.html

Methodology

Insure.com surveyed 2,000 licensed drivers age 18 and older. Respondents were split evenly between men and women and distributed across age groups and regions. The online-panel survey was fielded in December 2013.

About Insure.com

Insure.com provides a comprehensive array of information on auto insurance, home insurance, health insurance, and life insurance. The site offers an extensive library of originally authored insurance articles and decision-making tools that are not available from any other single source, including its extensive car insurance discounts tool. Insure.com is owned and operated by QuinStreet, Inc. (NASDAQ: QNST), one of the largest Internet marketing and media companies in the world. QuinStreet is committed to providing consumers and businesses with the information they need to research, find and select the products, services and brands that best meet their needs. The company is a leader in visitor-friendly marketing practices. For more information, please visit QuinStreet.com.
###

Twitter: @InsureCom

Press contact:
Amy Danise
860-386-6446
adanise (at) insure.com Reported by PRWeb 9 hours ago.

California: Only One-Third Have Regained Insurance Lost Through Obamacare

$
0
0
California: Only One-Third Have Regained Insurance Lost Through Obamacare California has long been the flagship for Obamacare. It was targeted last fall by President Barack Obama's own activist group, Organizing for Action, for precisely that reason: given the strength of their volunteer efforts, they hoped the state could be a symbol for the success of Obamacare as a whole. 

That is one reason that there is so much loud cheering by the media's left-wing commentators every time Covered California, the state's Obamacare program, announces that it has achieved something, no matter how modest--or how exaggerated.

Yet many of Covered California's "successes" are only relative to the failure of the program as a whole, and most of them are exaggerated. For example, on the day Obamacare enrollment started, Covered California reported that it had received 5 million web hits. In fact, however, it had received only 645,000--roughly 10% of what was initially reported. 

The latest version of such inflation is Covered California's jubilant announcement last week that "500,108 Californians enrolled for health insurance and selected plans through the end of 2013."

That was cause for jubilation by Ezra Klein--from the start, one of Obamcare's chief media pitchmen--and Evan Soltas in the Washington Post, who celebrated California's achievement of "424,396" enrollments. As John McCormack of the Weekly Standard notes, Klein and Soltas are only counting those eligible for Obamacare subsidies, not the total number who enrolled. 

But there is a further problem: California refuses to say, or cannot say, how many of those have actually paid for their insurance, meaning we do not know the actual number.

It gets worse--much worse. 

By the end of October, the executive director of California's Obamacare exchange confirmed that up to 900,000 people in the state would lose their current health insurance by the end of 2013--not including those who may lose it through their workplaces in 2014. Many of those are among the 500,000 or so who signed up for Obamacare through Covered California by the end of 2013--about 330,000, according to McCormack. That also means that only about 200,000 previously uninsured people signed up for Obamacare.

As for the other 600,000 or so, no one know what happened to them--they are just uninsured. The state refused to participate in President Barack Obama's proposed "fix" for those who had their policies canceled. 

So roughly three times as many people have lost insurance as have gained it. That is what the left now defines as "success." The rest of the country is presumably meant to take heart from the fact that California's performance highlights the best-case scenario for Obamacare. And there are other problems--a boycott by Calfornia doctors, for one.

Klein and Soltas at least have the presence of mind not to go as far as Covered California and claim 1.2 million people in the state signed up for expanded Medicaid through Obamacare. Half of those were simply transferred into the program by bureaucrats, and the other half signed up for Medi-Cal during the period of Obamacare enrollment, but not necessarily because of it. 

Covered California claims its numbers show "continued vigor in the new insurance marketplace." Much more of such "vigor," and the state's insurance industry will be dead.

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 8 hours ago.

AP-GfK Poll: Negative view of health rollout eases

$
0
0
WASHINGTON -- Memo to the White House: The website may be fixed, but President Barack Obama's new health insurance markets have yet to win over most consumers. Negative perceptions of the health care rollout have eased, a new Associated Press-GfK poll finds. But overall, two-thirds of Americans say things still aren't going well. Reported by azcentral.com 8 hours ago.

Health Insurance: Reimbursement to Cause Bailout?

$
0
0
Health insurance is taking a mighty turn for the worse after this ill-fated attempt at “affordable care” by the Obama administration. Things are looking very bleak indeed after Thursday’s Moody’s rating downgrade of the outlook for inurance industry from “stable” … Reported by WebProNews 8 hours ago.

IBC enrollment in individual plans tops 50K

$
0
0
More than 52,000 people have enrolled in Independence Blue Cross’ new individual health insurance plans, which became effective Jan. 1, that meet the requirements of the Affordable Care Act. The Philadelphia health insurance company said 27,528 people have enrolled in IBC’s individual health plans through the federal government’s health insurance marketplace. Another 24,750 individual members enrolled directly with IBC through its website ibx4you.com, brokers, telesales agents, or by visiting… Reported by bizjournals 8 hours ago.

Colibrium Announces Record Company Growth & Strategic Partnerships in 2013

$
0
0
Colibrium, the industry leader in sales and marketing automation solutions for health insurance companies, today announced record 2013 growth of more than 500% across their Tuo® software and Colibrium Direct business process outsourcing divisions.

Atlanta, GA (PRWEB) January 27, 2014

Colibrium, the industry leader in sales and marketing automation solutions for health insurance companies, today announced record 2013 growth of more than 500% across their Tuo® software and Colibrium Direct business process outsourcing divisions. This growth will allow Colibrium to continue to provide existing and new health plan clients with innovative solutions to succeed in a rapidly changing health insurance marketplace.

"2013 marks another record breaking year for our company," said Mark Poling, CEO of Colibrium. "A year in which our company experienced rapid growth, forged new strategic partnerships and increased the flexibility of our solution to directly address our clients’ needs. Colibrium is proud to continue to exceed our clients’ expectations with best-in-class, integrated sales, service and wellness automation solutions."

"We are excited about the future prospects of our partnership with Colibrium," said Larry Bridge, Senior Vice President at TriZetto. "We selected Colibrium because the company is well equipped to address payor needs in the post-reform marketplace with their flexible CRM capabilities."

2013 Milestones & Achievements·     Record Company Growth: Colibrium grows BPO and software division workforce by a combined 500%. Atlanta, Alpharetta and Seattle offices continue to expand as part of our continued world-class client service initiative.
·     Strategic Partnerships with TriZetto and Microsoft: Partnerships with TriZetto and Microsoft provide Colibrium clients with best-in-class Sales and Marketing Automation solutions that leverage enterprise class Microsoft Dynamics CRM and fully integrate with TriZetto’s powerful QNXT and FACETS core administration systems.
·     Gartner: 2013 Hype Cycle lists Colibrium as a top vendor of automated software solutions for healthcare payers.
·     Tuo™ 6.0 Software Release: Tuo® 6.0 focuses on "speed to market" implementation by integrating and leveraging existing client technology, including FACETS, QNXT and CRM to support defined contribution, private exchanges, state and federal health insurance exchange integration, shopping decision support and enrollment options. Tuo 6.0 is designed to drive member retention and consumer acquisition by providing members with a world class customer experience and customized plans based on their needs.
·     Client Delivery: Colibrium Partners remains the only company in the industry to feature a 100% reference-able client base and perfect track record of providing successful solution deployments since the company’s inception nearly a decade ago.

"Colibrium continues their successful track record of providing integrated, highly flexible software that positions clients effectively for success in the marketplace," said Dennis Schmuland, chief health strategy officer, U.S. Health and Life Sciences, Microsoft. "We are proud of our longstanding partnership with Colibrium and continue to be impressed by their ability to innovate and leverage the Microsoft Dynamics CRM platform to deliver exceptional customer sales and service automation capabilities that health plans need more than ever before."

To learn more about how our award winning Tuo® software and industry leading BPO offering can help your health plan address their business challenges in today’s insurance market, come meet us on March 6th & 7th at The AHIP Exchange Conference in Washington DC or call us directly at 678-800-1886.

About Colibrium

Colibrium delivers Sales, Service and Wellness automation to health plans. Our Business Process Outsourcing and Tuo® software suite are designed to provide health plans with both turn-key and modular solutions. Tuo® brings market segmentation and comprehensive functionality across the entire health insurance enterprise. Colibrium also provides a pre-configured version of Microsoft® Dynamics CRM (Customer Relationship Management) designed specifically for the health insurance industry. For more information, please visit: http://www.colibrium.com.

About TriZetto

TriZetto provides world-class information technology and service solutions that help payers and providers work more efficiently and collaborate to deliver better health. TriZetto solutions touch over half the U.S. insured population and reach more than 200,000 care providers. TriZetto helps healthcare organizations enhance administrative efficiency; improve the cost, quality and delivery of care; address compliance; and compete to win in an emerging retail market. Payer solutions include benefits administration, care management, network management and portal platforms, as well as consulting, application management and business management services. Provider solutions include real-time eligibility assurance, claims editing, revenue cycle management technology and services that help providers get paid quickly and accurately. For more information, visit http://www.trizetto.com. Reported by PRWeb 8 hours ago.

First Look: Rubio Rips Insurance Bailout in New Video

$
0
0
First Look: Rubio Rips Insurance Bailout in New Video Florida Senator Marco Rubio continued his assault on an Obamacare “bailout” quietly built into the health care law in new video address to constituents provided exclusively to Breitbart News.

“We should not allow private companies to use their political influence to allow them to write provisions and laws that allow them to be bailed out with taxpayer funding,” Rubio says in the video.

At issue is a “risk corridor” provision in Obamacare that acts as a kind of insurance pool for the health insurance companies in the event the clients they insure include too many sick people, driving up costs.

“In and of itself, that is not a bad idea - it has merit. Because there are, from time to time, in a competitive insurance marketplace, where 1-2 companies, out of hundreds, will make a mistake. Our job is not to keep them in business but what we don't want to see happen is the bills that are coming in, lets say from a hospital or a doctor, go unpaid because the company doesn't have the money to pay it,” Rubio says.

However, he adds, the idea as applied to Obamacare is a bad one because the law is “guaranteed to fail.”

Because not enough young and healthy people are signing up and President Obama has unilaterally delayed various deadlines in the law, the exchange market is “basically the equivalent to a high risk pool – that is an insurance product that's guaranteed to lose money,” Rubio says.

“Now the federal government, meaning you and your taxpayer dollars, will have to come in and bail these companies out,” Rubio says.

At the beginning of the video, Rubio read from several constituent letters from Florida residents practially begging him to stop the bailout from happening.

The Florida Senator has introduced legislation to stop the bailout and says there is growing bipartisan interest in the bill.

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 6 hours ago.

Wonkblog: Here’s the deal with the Obamacare ‘bailout’

$
0
0
*Explain the Obamacare 'bailout' to me as simply as possible.*

The Obamacare "bailout" is a term that Republicans recently began using to describe three programs in the health-care law -- two temporary and one permanent -- that make it less financially risky for health insurance plans to sell on the new exchanges. Sometimes its also used to refer to one specific program in the health-care law known as 'risk corridors.' Reported by Washington Post 6 hours ago.

Don't Be Fooled by Latest Medicare Scare Campaign From an Insurance Front Group

$
0
0
If you go to 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 500, in Washington, D.C. in search of what you've been told is the address of a grass roots organization concerned about "cuts" to Medicare, you will likely be surprised what you find there.

You will indeed find an organization that is lobbying hard to keep federal dollars flowing, but it is anything but grass roots.

Ads supposedly sponsored by the Coalition for Medicare Choices started appearing last week on buses and subway trains and on Washington TV stations warning that seniors will face higher costs, fewer benefits and a loss of provider choice if Congress and the Obama administration don't take action to keep planned rate cuts from going into effect.

The ads are part of what POLITICO described as "the new seven-figure campaign ... that is the group's biggest mobilization to date for Medicare Advantage," the alternative to traditional Medicare that is operated by private insurance companies.

The real sponsor of the ads is the real tenant of 601 Pennsylvania Avenue., N.W., Suite 500: America's Health Insurance Plans, which is one of the best-funded and influential lobbying and PR outfits in the nation's capital.

As I noted last week, several insurance companies make a boatload of money by participating in the Medicare Advantage program. The Government Accountability Office noted in a recent report that the federal government spent about $135 billion on the Medicare Advantage program in 2012 alone. And much of that was in the form of overpayments that the government has been sending to private insurers for years.

Brian Biles, professor of health policy at George Washington University, explained in testimony before the Senate Committee on Aging last Wednesday that Medicare has paid private plans more than the costs of traditional Medicare since 1997 when Congress authorized extra payments to entice private plans to operate in rural areas. Six years later, those extra payments were extended to just about all private Medicare plans.

Biles testified that those extra payments to Medicare Advantage plans nationwide averaged 13 percent -- or $1,100 per enrollee -- in 2009. The Congressional Budget Office projected that year that the excess payments would total more than $150 billion over ten years.

As lawmakers were debating health care reform in 2009, they inserted a provision in what became the Affordable Care Act to get rid of those overpayments. Alarmed, AHIP has been hard at work ever since trying to figure out how to keep the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from carrying out that provision of the law.

And for good reason. Insurers like UnitedHealth and Humana with a substantial number of Medicare Advantage enrollees are able to convert those excess payments into hefty profits. Financial analysts at Goldman Sachs estimated a few years ago that 66 percent of the net income at Humana, where I used to work, came from its Medicare Advantage business.

Not all of that money goes to profits, however. Some of it is used to add benefits like dental and vision and gym memberships, which many seniors enrolled in the plans do indeed value. But another big chunk of the extra payments goes to advertising and sales activities -- and to AHIP to finance the group's lobbying and PR campaigns.

The Coalition for Medicare Choices current campaign is heavy on intimidation, all of it directed toward members of Congress. Under the headline, "Seniors are Watching," is this warning:

"In 2010, Seniors saw Washington cut Medicare Advantage funding by $200 billion, causing rate cuts that already hurts them. Now more rate cuts are looming. Rate cuts that would mean higher costs, lost benefits and lost provider choices for seniors. As next year's Medicare Advantage rates are being set, seniors are watching more closely than ever. They don't want to see any more rate cuts. More than 1.5 million seniors are ready to defend the Medicare Advantage coverage they like and want to keep. They know from experience that seeing is believing."

That reference to "coverage they like and want to keep" is, of course, a not-so-subtle reference to President Obama's ill-advised assurance that "if you like your health care plan, you can keep it."

And there was this thinly veiled threat in the POLITICO story from "an insurance industry source familiar with the campaign:"

"If CMS doesn't keep Medicare Advantage payment rates flat next year, it is going to create a huge political problem for members of Congress this fall when they have to face millions of angry seniors who just found out they are losing benefits and choices they were promised they could keep."

Translation: AHIP will be behind those huge political problems during the re-election campaigns this fall. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

Working on Empty: America's Workers Are Spending Down Savings to Survive

$
0
0
As the president takes the podium for the State of the Union, the majority of people watching and listening to his speech will be almost certainly be worse off financially than they were when he took office. That's not allocating blame, just stating a fact. According to the Pew Research Center, in the first two years following the Great Recession, 93 percent of Americans lost net worth. Only 7 percent got wealthier. Forty-three percent of those sampled in a nationally-weighted survey I recently commissioned believe this is a permanent trend.

Using the online platform Survey Monkey, I ran the 2500-respondent query as part of an ongoing book project charting how America's workers are faring, and what qualities allow people to succeed despite the daunting state of the job market. Among the sobering findings were that nearly 35% of respondents said they had spent retirement or personal savings to supplement their wages. Twenty percent relied only on personal savings; four percent on retirement savings, like an early withdrawal from an IRA or 401k, and eleven percent spent both. According to an analysis of data from the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Census Bureau by the firm Hello Wallet, in 2010, one in four Americans withdrew money from their retirement accounts. And the Transamerica Center For Retirement Studies found a third of un- or under-employed workers made early withdrawals.

Even more arresting: 21 percent of those I surveyed agreed with the statement "In 2013, I borrowed money from friends or family specifically in order to pay household, medical or credit card bills."

All of this adds up to some painful math: Americans, faced with stagnant wages despite pronounced gains in productivity, are spending against their future in order to live today. Here are some of the scenarios we'll see play out in the coming years:

*1) Consumers Who Can't Buy (Much)*

America is a consumer economy, with up to 70 percent of GDP generated by spending and purchases. In 1955, the ratio of household debt to disposable income was 49 percent. By 2010, it had grown to 112 percent. In pushing to re-up the lapsed Emergency Unemployment Compensation program, affecting long-term unemployed, President Obama made two arguments -- a moral "there for the grace of God go I" plea, and a statement that money to the unemployed was immediately spent, not saved, thus aiding local businesses. Those politicians and analysts who disagree say that Americans must be willing to take lower paying jobs or relocate in order to find opportunity. That approach may work in some cases (though people who have already spent down their savings have little funds to relocate), but the case remains that jobless Americans and workers in transition cannot bolster a consumer economy.

*2) Finance-Draining Retraining*

Job retraining is essential for many people seeking new employment. For those who return to college to reboot their career and incur educational debt, that debt (unlike credit cards) cannot be dissolved by bankruptcy. That means that some senior citizens are already finding their Social Security checks garnished to pay back educational institutions. If Social Security garnishing becomes widespread, you can bet the government may find itself having to negotiate a solution -- perhaps taking on the student loan defaults (and incurring more government debt) in order to protect seniors. In addition, as I have found during my reporting, many people are too proud to declare bankruptcy even in dire circumstances. Many spend down their retirement savings while looking for work, leaving themselves in a possible bind for their latter years.

*3) Cobbled-Together Careers*

Twelve percent of the respondents agreed "I work multiple part-time jobs, but would prefer to work one full-time job." With the advent of the (still contentious) Affordable Care Act, people who don't have employer-provided insurance, Medicare or Medicaid can generally find healthcare. The cost and quality vary based on location. Part-time jobs generally offer far fewer benefits than full-time work, not only health insurance but retirement plans and greater job security. Working multiple part-time jobs also often requires additional outlays for costs like transportation, and financial savvy to account for fluctuations in income.Only 34 percent of people surveyed agree with the statement: "I believe I will have enough income (from savings, pension, or other sources) to live on comfortably during retirement." Yet Americans are still a resilient bunch. Half of Americans believe their peak earning years lie ahead of them. Half also say that they work not just for money, but for enjoyment or creativity. One question that lies ahead for America -- for the president, the Congress, business leaders and citizens -- is how to harness the creativity of the American workforce, and provide the tools eager citizens need to succeed in a volatile labor market. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images