Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Montana Democrat Rob Quist May Make Another House Run

$
0
0
CHICAGO ― Democrat Rob Quist, the folk musician who lost a competitive U.S. House election last month in Montana, is already thinking about trying again.

Quist spoke to HuffPost at Saturday’s People’s Summit, a conference of Bernie Sanders-supporting activists organized by the labor union National Nurses United and other major progressive organizations.

“The people I connected with, I got them in my corner, but there just wasn’t enough time” to reach enough people across the sprawling state, Quist said. “So if I did this again, of course, I’d have a whole year to do it.”

Asked whether that was a hint he would run for his state’s sole House seat in 2018’s general election, Quist responded, “It could be. I haven’t decided for sure yet.”

“People here, folks like Our Revolution ... are really encouraging me,” he said, referring to a group formed to push Sanders’ agenda. “And they said we’ll support you if you step into it again,” he added.

In the meantime, Quist has plans to start a progressive foundation called the Solution Room, and make a documentary about his experience running for office.

Republican Greg Gianforte defeated Quist by about 6 percentage points in the May 25 special election to fill the seat Republican Ryan Zinke gave up to become President Donald Trump’s Interior Department secretary.  

Quist’s showing was respectable in a state Donald Trump won by 20 points over Hilary Clinton last November and where Zinke won re-election in that same vote by about 16 points. 

Still, Quist’s loss was a disappointment for Democrats in general ― and Sanders supporters in particular ― who saw an opportunity to not only land a blow against Trump, but elect an unabashed liberal. Quist, a supporter of single-payer health insurance and marijuana legalization, was an early backer of Sanders’ presidential run.

That Gianforte assaulted a reporter asking about his position on the House GOP health care bill the day before the election made the loss that much tougher for Quist backers. (Gianforte has since apologized and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge.) Although Quist raised more than $6 million ― mostly through small individual donations ― during the the campaign’s relatively short course, some progressives criticized the national Democratic Party for allowing him to be pilloried by outside conservative groups in March and most of April without institutional backing of his own. Spending by outside groups for Gianforte was about 9 times the amount of comparable funding for Quist, according to a Roll Call analysis of official data.

The national Republican Party focused on depicting Quist ― a newcomer to politics ― as a deadbeat, spotlighting taxes he had failed to pay on time. (Quist argued it was an error that reflects his status as an ordinary middle-class American with financial struggles.)

With a chuckle, Quist said, “That’s probably true,” when asked about criticism of the national Democratic Party for not committing to his race earlier and more aggressively.

“I really feel that I’ve tried to live a pretty good life,” he said. While saying he had performed “years of community service,” was his high school’s student body president and an Eagle Scout, he added that “none of that really made it to the papers.”

“Every time in the local papers, it was always repeating the negative narratives,” he said. “But I understand that the first time you run for office you kind of have to go through a lot of the vetting process.”

The Free Beacon, a conservative news site based in Washington that concentrated its stories on Quist’s financial problems, is a particular whipping horse for him.

“I call it the ‘freakin’ beacon’!” he joked.

At the People’s Summit, Quist participated in a panel about “transforming the Democratic Party,” and he lingered to engage with some of those who helped fund his campaign. Quist fans repeatedly interrupted the HuffPost interview to shake his hand and offer words of support.

For Quist, it was just what he needed after his bruising first brush with electoral politics.

“I come from a family of basketball players and we don’t take losing lightly,” he said. “This has been such a great healing thing to come to this and to meet with a lot of people that really supported me from all over the country.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 3 hours ago.

GOP Plans to Strip Planned Parenthood Funds From Health Bill

$
0
0
Senate Republicans aim to remove federal funding for Planned Parenthood Federation of America in their health-insurance overhaul bill, creating another potential concern for centrist GOP senators considering whether to back the legislation. Reported by Wall Street Journal 20 hours ago.

Kaiser launches 'Ayarisa' to provide healthcare to Ghanaians

$
0
0
Kaiser Global Health Limited has launched Ayarisa, a novel product that offers health insurance services using the mobile phone as a primary enabler. Reported by Myjoyonline 12 hours ago.

Puerto Rico Votes In Favor Of U.S. Statehood Amid Low Turnout

$
0
0
By Tracy Rucinski

SAN JUAN (Reuters) - The economically struggling U.S. island territory of Puerto Rico voted overwhelmingly on Sunday in favor of becoming the 51st state, although turnout was low and adding another star to the U.S. flag likely faces an uphill battle in Congress.

A government website for the non-binding referendum, Puerto Rico’s fifth such plebiscite since 1967, showed 97 percent supported statehood. Only 23 percent of the 2.2 million eligible voters participated in the vote.

Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rossello campaigned for statehood as the best avenue to boost future growth for the island, which has $70 billion in debt, a 45 percent poverty rate, woefully underperforming schools and near-insolvent pension and health systems.

“From today going forward, the Federal government will no longer be able to ignore the voice of the majority of the American citizens in Puerto Rico,” Rossello said in a statement.

“It would be highly contradictory for Washington to demand democracy in other parts of the world, and NOT respond to the legitimate right to self-determination that was exercised today in the American territory of Puerto Rico,” he added.

Puerto Rico’s hazy political status, dating back to its 1898 acquisition by the United States from Spain, has contributed to the economic crisis that pushed it last month into the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.

“I voted for statehood,” Armando Abreu, a 74-year-old retiree, said after voting. “Even if it’s still a long way off in the distance, it’s our only hope.”

Those in favor of statehood for the mainly Spanish-speaking Caribbean island hope the new status would put the territory on equal standing with the 50 U.S. states, giving them more access to federal funds and the right to vote for U.S. president.

Under the current system, Puerto Rico’s 3.5 million American citizens do not pay federal taxes, vote in presidential elections or receive proportionate federal funding on programs like the Medicaid health insurance system for the poor. The U.S. government oversees policy and financial areas such as infrastructure, defense and trade.

Rossello will ask Congress to respect the result, but Puerto Rico is seen as a low priority in Washington.*‘BOGUS PLEBISCITE’*

The island’s two main opposition parties boycotted the vote, which gave Puerto Ricans three options: becoming a U.S. state; remaining a territory; or becoming an independent nation, with or without some continuing political association with the United States.

Puerto Rico’s former governor, Rafael Hernandez Colon, said in a statement: “A contrived plebiscite fabricated an artificial majority for statehood by disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of Commonwealth supporters.”

Rather than heading to the polls, some 500 Puerto Ricans marched on the streets of San Juan, waving Puerto Rico’s flag and burning the American flag while chanting in support of independence.

“This is a bogus plebiscite. Our future is independence. We need to be able to decide our own fate,” said Liliana Laboy, one of the organizers of the protest.

Boycotters were also angry about the costly referendum at a time when over 400 schools have closed and many Puerto Ricans are struggling to make ends meet. Schools where voting took place were in poor condition, with cracked paint and bare-bones playgrounds.

Puerto Rico spent an estimated $8 million on the campaign and election process, according to a government spokesman.

 

(Reporting by Tracy Rucinski; Editing by Grant McCool and Peter Cooney)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

Iowa Seeks to Revamp Affordable Care Act

$
0
0
The Iowa proposal, which would offer just one type of insurance plan and revamp the ACA’s subsidies that help people buy coverage, will draw close attention from states facing a meltdown of their health-insurance marketplaces next year. Reported by Wall Street Journal 7 hours ago.

Iowa official pitches stopgap health insurance solution

$
0
0
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa’s insurance commissioner is proposing a plan he thinks could keep Iowa from becoming the first state to lose all of the health insurance carriers offering policies on the Affordable Care Act exchange next year. Doug Ommenn says he traveled to Washington last week with officials from two major Iowa […] Reported by Seattle Times 8 hours ago.

State takeover directs A.C. firefighters to work 56 hour week

$
0
0
Atlantic City firefighters will see another 14 hours added to their work schedules starting next week. The city's state-appointed overseer, former U.S. Sen. Jeff Chiesa, upped the fire department members' workweek from 42 hours to 56; made adjustments to its health insurance coverage; and cut pay and staff as part of efforts to balance the battered Shore resort town's budget, according to the Press of Atlantic City. The International Association of Fire Fighters Local 198 claims the state didn't… Reported by bizjournals 5 hours ago.

Dropout rate for health law coverage is 16 percent this year

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) " The Trump administration says nearly 2 million people have dropped their health insurance through the Obama-era law after sign-up season ended Jan. 31. That's a 16 percent dropout rate.As of March 15, about 10.3... Reported by New Zealand Herald 4 hours ago.

Sanders Movement Plots Democratic Party Takeover At Weekend Gathering

$
0
0
CHICAGO ― After Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) finished his speech to a packed theater of his supporters on Saturday night, he took time to answer a few pre-taped questions from activists.

They wanted to know Sanders’ advice for talking to kids about climate change, overcoming Republican gerrymandering in the South ― and how to deal with losing elections, something a questioner comically noted Sanders knew a thing or two about from his early years in politics. 

“To those people who are losing right now, I’m sure they’d like to hear what got you through those dark times of losing over and over and over again. ... What got you through in those dark times?” television actor Kendrick Sampson asked, affectionately teasing Sanders.

“Thank you very much, Kendrick,” Sander deadpanned, eliciting laughs from the audience. “Kendrick makes a good point: Don’t get locked into a moment, because things change and sometimes they change very, very rapidly.”

Sanders went on to recount how he lost several campaigns for governor and senator before finally securing a post as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, then after two attempts, a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Most recently, he won re-election to the Senate in 2012 with 71 percent of the vote.

“The point is really that persistence is extremely important,” he concluded. 

It was a light-hearted exchange, but it summed up the political philosophy Sanders has sought to impress upon the grassroots movement that he built over the course of his ultimately unsuccessful presidential campaign. Organize people around an unabashedly progressive political platform and eventually, you will win the power you need to implement it, Sanders maintains. 

The more than 4,000 Sanders followers that gathered this weekend to talk strategy, commiserate and hear from the country’s progressive rock stars at the second annual People’s Summit conference in Chicago were largely ready to accept Sanders’ vision of a long slog toward progress ― and his insistence that the best vehicle for the electoral component of those efforts remains the Democratic Party.

In fact, one Sanders fan in attendance appeared to be taking his advice about persistence quite seriously. Moments after Sanders spoke, Rob Quist, the Montana Democrat who lost his special House election on May 25, informed HuffPost that he was taking a hard look at running again in 2018. It helped Sanders’ case that the conference began hours after U.K. left-wing Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn shocked the world with unexpected gains in the British election that deprived the Conservative Party of a majority. In his speech on Saturday night, Sanders encouraged his supporters to view Corbyn’s win as an affirmation of the progressive long game in the United States.

“I want to tell you what you already know ― that the movement for economic, racial and environmental justice is not just growing here in the U.S. It is growing worldwide,” Sanders declared. Judging by the cheers that followed, the audience didn’t need much convincing. 

In the United States, the Sanders movement has met with less success in some of its earliest electoral tests since the November election. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a top Sanders ally, lost his bid to chair the Democratic National Committee. The two Sanders supporters who have run in special congressional elections ― Quist in Montana, and before that, James Thompson in Kansas ― were narrowly defeated, albeit in districts long held by Republicans.

A recent Berniecrat effort to take over the California Democratic Party was similarly disappointing. Although Sanders activists mobilized en masse to win delegate spots to the state convention, their preferred candidate for chair, Kimberly Ellis, lost by a handful of votes to establishment favorite Eric Bauman. (Ellis and her backers are calling for an independent audit of the votes, alleging there were irregularities in the way proxy votes were counted.)

“It’s not gonna be a sudden change. Some change happens fast; some change happens slow,” said Dan Gordon, a 34-year-old Los Angeles-based voice-over actor and Berniecrat delegate to the California Democratic Party convention.Speakers and attendees at the People’s Summit instead celebrated the victories of a number of state and local lawmakers in the Sanders mold, including Democratic district attorney nominee Larry Krasner in Philadelphia; Mayor Chokwe Lumumba of Jackson, Mississippi; and New York State Assemblywoman Christine Pellegrino. 

Other points of pride were the majority support for a $15 minimum wage among congressional Democrats, and the small but growing consensus in the party behind single-payer health insurance, a version of which the California state Senate recently passed.

In keeping with the ground-up theme, parts of the People’s Summit functioned like a boot camp for activists looking to bring the Sanders revolution to their small towns and cities, one candidate or issue referendum at a time. Between speeches, panel discussions and at least one blowout dance party, there were “classes” taught by Sanders campaign veterans and successful progressive elected officials on tactics like digital organizing, nonviolent direct action and “transforming” the Democratic Party. 

“People are organizing all over the country right now ... and we are developing the action plan,” said Winnie Wong, a co-founder of the People for Bernie and a top conference organizer. “So we are occupying the position now of a sort of CENTCOM dashboard of the people who are giving calls to actions for people to plug into.”

Danielle Kyle, a 19-year-old political science student at Western Illinois University who convinced her once-moderate mother to join her at the summit, said a workshop on “building progressive power in rural America” was especially helpful.

A native of the Chicago suburbs, Kyle plans to stick around in rural Macomb, Illinois, after graduation and is considering a run for city council there in 2019.

“I got a lot of different perspectives from people in West Virginia, people in rural Wyoming that I didn’t know,” she said of the class on rural organizing. “They told me that I’m not their urban savior. I shouldn’t go in there and fix things for them.”

The left-wing confab in Chicago’s McCormick Place boasted attendees from all 50 states and a smattering of like-minded activists from Norway and Spain.

Given the limited number of spots allotted for general registration, conference organizers considered people’s race, gender and motivation for coming when deciding who to admit.

They also developed an elaborate system to ensure that financial need was not a barrier to participation. The labor union and influential Sanders backer National Nurses United covered the cost of the building rental, staff and amenities of the conference itself, including customized banners and swag, a mobile app for scheduling updates, three square meals for everyone and a handful of shopping-mall-style photo stations for goofy group pictures. 

Conference attendees were allowed to contribute to the costs of transportation and lodging on a sliding scale, with wealthier participants subsidizing busing and dorm-style accommodations for lower income activists to the tune of $220,000.

“This is a representation of a democratizing movement. Having people here who could not afford to be here I think was very important,” Wong said, likening it to a real-life incarnation of the type of socialism she and her peers want to see on a national scale. For all of the conference’s discussion of ― and attempts to embody ― idealistic policies, however, the focus was overwhelmingly on issue-based organizing and taking over the Democratic Party to push it to the left, rather than rallying behind third-party efforts.

At the same time, the Berniecrats’ vision for the party and plan for taking back power is strikingly different from that of their mainstream Democratic peers. Unlike on Capitol Hill and the talk shows of MSNBC, there was little interest in the investigation into ties between the Russian government and campaign associates of President Donald Trump. Some participants openly expressed doubt about the evidence of Russian influence in the election or welcomed the leaked Democratic National Committee emails for exposing the DNC staff’s bias toward former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Others simply argued that focusing disproportionately on Trump’s foibles would be no more successful now than it was during Clinton’s losing campaign.

“They’re definitely still stuck in the idea that Trump’s gonna be thrown out of office. So they’re yet to take the steps forward in trying to move their own policies,” said Antonio Rodriguez, a 23-year-old psychology student at the University of Illinois, Chicago.

A key part of the Berniecrats’ disagreement with other Democrats is their belief that the party’s embrace of business-friendly “neoliberal” policies since the 1990s led to an exodus of working people of all races from the party and laid the seeds for someone like Trump, who frequently relies on racist rhetoric, to pit the increasingly disenchanted working classes against one another.

The only answer, attendees maintained, was to mobilize voters around class, and direct their anger toward the corporations and ultra-rich people blocking more equitable policies.

Nick Martin, a 28-year-old liberal Mennonite activist sporting a Carhartt camouflage hat, claimed that his organization, Lancaster Stands Up, was using the tactic to recruit Trump supporters to a fight against a natural gas pipeline in the area.

“We find that organizing people around the issues and having a narrative that talks about who the real enemy is as the billionaires, the ruling class, cuts across false divisions,” he said.


Kudos and congratulations to all the achievements, but it’s going to slow and there are limits to how much we can achieve as progressives within the Democratic Party.
Rod Brana, 61
Not everyone at the People’s Summit was still willing to work within the bounds of the Democratic Party though. There were dozens of people advertising their affiliation with “Draft Bernie for a People’s Party,” a new movement asking Sanders to start his own political party.

At times the “Draft Bernie” partisans’ scorn for Democrats led them to turn on Sanders himself, booing Sanders’ calls for reforming the Democratic Party during his speech on Saturday night.

Rod Brana, a 61-year-old architect from Washington, D.C., admitted to being one of the people who jeered, describing it as an almost involuntary bodily impulse. (His son Nick, a Sanders campaign veteran, started the “Draft Bernie” initiative.)

“It just comes out,” Brana said of the boos.

The local and state-level wins Sanders highlighted paled in comparison to higher-profile failures to infiltrate the party, according to Brana ― especially Ellison’s defeat in the race for DNC chair and the results of the recent California Democratic Party chair election. 

“Kudos and congratulations to all the achievements, but it’s going too slow and there are limits to how much we can achieve as progressives within the Democratic Party,” he said.

The People’s Summit organizers were tolerant of dissenting views about the Democratic Party, including by welcoming the Green Party to set up a booth in the exhibit hall.

In private conversations though, leading figures in the Berniecrat orbit fretted about third-party advocates’ lack of pragmatism, emphasizing the basic barriers third parties face in getting on the ballot in 50 states.

Claire Sandberg, a former senior organizer on the Sanders campaign who had just returned from advising Corbyn in the U.K., also lamented the impulse to view leaving the Democratic Party as a panacea.

“They’re missing the fact that there is no shortcut to building a broad social consensus in favor of the policies that we need,” she said. “We’re actually in a battle for the common sense of America and we can’t do an end-run around that by starting a new formation and getting in the back door.”

Sign up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday, we will bring you the best original reporting, long form writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how it’s all made. Click here to sign up!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 4 hours ago.

Iowa may be first state with no health insurers on exchange

$
0
0
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa could be the first state in the nation with no health insurance company willing to offer policies on its Affordable Care Act exchange next year unless the President Donald Trump's administration approves a stopgap proposal, Iowa Insurance Commissioner Doug Ommen said Monday. "While legislation appears to slowly be moving at the federal level, it is unlikely any changes to the ACA will be enacted in time to keep Iowa's individual health insurance market from a total collapse leaving nearly 72,000 individuals with zero options to purchase health insurance for 2018," Ommen said in the proposal to federal officials. "What that seems to suggest to me is that even a market that appears stable and has pretty robust competition can lose it almost overnight and that's sort of what we've seen with Iowa," said Cynthia Cox, a health insurance reform expert at Kaiser Family Foundation, non-profit organization focusing on national health issues. According to the estimates that are part of the state proposal to the government, a person aged 21-34 making between $15,000 and $18,000 a year would get a monthly credit of $336 reducing their premium to $62 a month. The cost-sharing payments, given to insurers to help customers with modest incomes cover out-of-pocket expenses like co-payments and deductibles will be diverted under stopgap plan. Reported by SeattlePI.com 3 hours ago.

Trump Era Ignorance Triumphs Over Shakespeare

$
0
0
What’s to be said about the Public Theater’s production of “Julius Caesar,” which, having dressed the titular dictator in President Donald Trump’s weeds, has fulfilled its most obvious destiny by earning the relentless enmity of Trump’s fan base?

Here’s my offer: What a time to be alive but also mostly dead inside! What a thrill it is to have another dose of that fulminate-of-mercury outrage delivered to our screens. And what a terrific way to highlight two key features of our age ― the extreme uselessness of ever knowing anything and our tendency to expend too much of our spirit in a waste of shame.

Like all the great conservative mavens of “cultural literacy” recommended that we Gen-Xers do in college, I’ve spent many thousands of hours with William Shakespeare and the canon of Western Literature. And that’s fine. The canon is mostly pretty good, except for Tess of the D’Urbervilles.

In particular, I’ve spent more time with “Julius Caesar” than any reasonable person should be required to. But this weekend’s burst of psychopathic indignation over one production of the play was a good reminder of what a futile pursuit that was. America, circa now, is more apt to valorize people who don’t know a single thing about what they’re talking about than it is to reward those who do. Being armed too strong in honesty, I ended up on the losing end of this weekend’s joust over “Julius Caesar.”

So, thanks for nothing, E.D. Hirsch! I’ve really wasted my time. But since it’s my time to waste, let’s make the most of it.

OK. The thing about Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” is that it’s not actually about Caesar. The main character is a politician named Brutus who, greatly concerned about Caesar’s violations of democratic norms and thoroughly convinced that he alone understands what ails Rome, is seduced into a plot to murder the Roman dictator by conspirators who know that Brutus’ yen for high-mindedness will give them cover for their base ambitions. The play is a “tragedy” because Brutus, a decent man, doesn’t figure out that he’s a fool who has made Rome worse until it’s far too late.

This story is pretty squarely in Shakespeare’s wheelhouse. When he wasn’t writing what many people dismiss as “Tudor propaganda,” he was pretty concerned about how easily an established order could be tipped into chaos. Shakespeare wasn’t too keen on people stepping out of their place. The “Great Chain of Being” didn’t offer much encouragement to populist revolutions. Of course, it would be interesting to know what the Bard might have made of Trump, but I suspect that if the real estate mogul demonstrated a willingness to keep his actors gainfully employed, Shakespeare would have ruffled very few feathers.

Nevertheless, over the weekend, when the Public Theater’s “Julius Caesar” became the latest piece of cultural bric-a-brac to get laundered through the media outrage machine, I found it hilarious and appalling because the outrage only succeeds if you’re aggressively ignorant about the play. A day later, what I’m finding funny is the thought that somewhere in New York right now, there are some liberals, equally ignorant about the play, who will rush to see the Public Theater’s production, salivating at the notion that this version really sticks it to Donald Trump.

They are in for a real surprise, because if anything, “Julius Caesar” aims its daggers at the notion of a high-on-their-own-supply Resistance, flush with the belief that the best solution to all their political problems is the quickest one.

The second scene in Act 3 is going to be especially unsettling for them. That’s the famous scene of competing orations where Brutus first recites a “Stronger Together” speech that could have been penned by Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook. Supremely confident that his elite standing is sufficient to the task of educating the crowd in the correct course of action, Brutus then leaves them alone with Mark Antony ― and immediately loses them to Antony’s devil-tongued “Make Rome Great Again” incitement to mob violence. For his part, Caesar exits the play as a man more sinned against than sinning.

Rome, meanwhile, descends into violence. The very next thing the mob does, in fact, is murder a poet named Cinna who had nothing at all to do with the assassination of Caesar. Cinna tells the mob that they’ve mistaken him for another man, a conspirator who shares his name, but the crowd decides to murder him anyway, shouting, “Tear him for his bad verses!” and “It’s no matter, his name’s Cinna!”

I feel you, Cinna, wherever you are. What, indeed, is the point of being right about anything?

But Cinna’s murder is pretty fitting to think about in this moment. With all of their future at stake and society in the balance, the whipped-up crowd demonstrates that the only thing that they’re actually good at is tearing to pieces someone completely inconsequential ― someone who just accidentally wandered into their lives, who they would otherwise never have noticed.

That’s what we’re good at now. That’s what has been done to this production of “Julius Caesar.” 

It’s a good thing that such easy targets exist because otherwise we would have to confront bigger problems. For instance, the president is an utterly venal, shameless liar. But he exists because of decades of choices that we all made, together. We really should be doing the hard work of sorting out our own house in a sensible fashion and taking stock of our failings, but you know what’s easier? Utterly destroying the woman who played “Vicki” on the all-but-forgotten show “Suddenly Susan,” for a really epically hack piece of “art.”

Bank of America, which hopefully has figured out how not to accidentally repossess people’s homes, will probably not breathe a discouraging word should some 20 million people lose their health insurance in the next few weeks. But the bank made sure to register its extreme displeasure with the Public Theater, withdrawing the funding from the theater company that I am almost positive it had forgotten proffering in the first place.

You want to be mad that this production presented Caesar in Trumpian fashion? Be my guest. But I have to be honest with you: If you’re going to be angry about it, be angry at the fact that it’s kind of a cheap move on the director’s part. 


Presidents portrayed as Julius Caesar in U.S. productions: Lincoln, Reagan, Clinton, GWB, Obama, Trump. (Caesar died in all of them.)

— Timothy Burke (@bubbaprog) June 12, 2017


Replacing Caesar with a recognizable world leader is one of the oldest tricks in the book. Did you know that the Acting Company partnered with the Guthrie Theatre on a 2012 production of “Julius Caesar” that put an analogue of President Barack Obama in the title role? It’s true. Somehow, liberals forgot they were supposed to be outraged at the sight of the murder, and I’m left to speculate that Psalm 109:8-chanting conservatives loved it and were literally brought to the point of violent sexual ecstasy when Brutus murdered Barry O. in cold blood on the stage.

Dolling Caesar up like Trump is basically a quick-and-dirty, shorthand way to drag an audience into the world of this particular play ― a society on the edge that teeters and breaks thanks to the actions of a few powerful men. And when I say “quick-and-dirty,” I mean that it’s like dropping a damned anvil on the stage. It’s not subtle!

Here’s the rub, though ― maybe it can’t afford to be subtle.

This play is being produced for an audience of affluent theater-going New Yorkers, and they live a life that is, psychologically speaking, about as far away from epochal societal instability as you can get. So you hand them a Trump-Caesar, and it stimulates their liberal, professional-class mores. “This is not normal,” they think as the play begins. “I was born as free as Caesar,” Cassius whispers to Brutus, adding, “So were you.” It’s time for some Roman-style game theory! And total wish fulfillment comes before intermission in the form of Caesar’s murder.

If the production is good enough (and I’ve no idea if the Public Theater’s is), it forces this audience to confront the way everything works out for those anti-Caesar revolutionaries and gives them a moment of unexpected frisson when they realize they’re supposed to see themselves in Brutus’ tragic aspect.

So it’s possible that the way this play is being produced is actually beneficial for its intended audience. Perhaps this production is capable of shaking its particular audience out of their dull and easy way of thinking about the world, putting them in touch with more meaningful ideas.

Now that I think about it, I might actually do “Julius Caesar” this way if I had to produce the play. But I’d be utterly mystified if anyone, hearing about my production, was compelled to attempt to set the Guinness record for Being Mad On The Internet about it. The only thing I can say about such people is that they must lead a pretty blissful existence if this is what gets them worked up.

Besides, you should know that if I really wanted to savage Donald Trump ― if I just wanted to turn him into a punching bag for my own cheap thrills ― I wouldn’t put him in Caesar’s shoes. No, I’d feature him in the title role of “Macbeth” (Ivanka could be Lady Macbeth!) and I’d hire the most pornographically violent fight director that money could buy.

And what would that prove? I have no idea! But I guess that’s the point: LOL, nothing matters.

~~~~~Jason Linkins edits “Eat The Press” for HuffPost and co-hosts the HuffPost Politics podcast “So, That Happened.” Subscribe here, and listen to the latest episode below. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 1 hour ago.

Just Lost Your Job? COBRA May Be Your Best Health Insurance Strategy Now

$
0
0
With the 2018 health insurance market still in play, you might want to extend your job-based insurance until this fall, when the outlines of the health law's marketplaces should become clearer. Reported by NPR 15 hours ago.

Kids Count report: Washington state ranks high on health insurance, low on high-school graduation

$
0
0
In children’s health, Washington stands above almost every other state. But high-school graduation rates and low enrollment in preschool continue to drag down the overall status of kids here, according to an annual ranking. Reported by Seattle Times 14 hours ago.

Iowa may be first state with no health insurers on exchange

$
0
0
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) " Iowa could be the first state in the nation with no health insurance company willing to offer policies on its Affordable Care Act exchange next year unless the President Donald Trump's administration approves... Reported by New Zealand Herald 12 hours ago.

This Virginia Democratic Primary Is A Crucial Test For The Party’s Progressive Wing

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― Virginia Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam squares off against progressive favorite Tom Perriello on Tuesday in the state’s highly competitive Democratic gubernatorial primary, where the left flank hopes national momentum will carry it to a win.

Thanks to Virginia’s status as one of two states with gubernatorial races this year (the other is New Jersey), the primary has attracted historic levels of attention and resources from Democrats eager to land a blow against President Donald Trump.

Northam, a 57-year-old pediatric neurologist, had locked up the support of virtually every major elected official in Virginia and was poised to cruise to the nomination until Perriello, a 42-year-old former diplomat and one-term congressman, announced his run in January.

Thanks to the endorsements of Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the country’s leading progressive politicians, and firm stances on several controversial issues, Perriello has excited the state’s younger and more liberal voters, erasing virtually all of Northam’s lead in the polls.

As a result, many progressives view the race as a crucial test of whether a more liberal candidate can prevail in a state where moderate Democrats have long ruled the roost. 

“This primary is really about what foot the Democratic Party in Virginia is going to lean on,” said Quentin Kidd, a Virginia politics expert at Christopher Newport University in Newport News, Virginia. “It’s leaned on the right foot for a decade and a half since Mark Warner evolved this model of a Democrat who can win statewide in Virginia. If Perriello wins it means it will lean slightly to the left foot.”

Kidd uses the word “lean,” because he doesn’t think the shift would be “any more dramatic” than a pivot to the left.Nowhere is the potential shift more significant, however, than in the state government’s posture toward Dominion Energy, Virginia’s influential power monopoly.

Perriello has refused to accept contributions from Dominion and opposes construction of the Atlantic Coastal pipeline, which the company is planning to construct across the state. Northam has declined to take a comparable stance against the natural gas pipeline, favoring tight regulation instead.

In the end, approval of the pipeline is a matter for federal regulators, but Dominion clearly views Perriello’s vocal opposition as a major threat. The company has mobilized tens of thousands of its employees, retirees and shareholders to campaign in the gubernatorial primaries, using thinly veiled language that makes clear they prefer Northam.

“If Northam wins tomorrow, you won’t hear much about Dominion any more, because Northam wouldn’t make that an issue,” Kidd predicted.

When Perriello got into the race, he immediately began to nationalize the contest, claiming he was inspired to run by Trump’s election ― and pitching himself as a bulwark against the effects of the president’s policies for Virginia.

“What people want to see right now is that willingness to stand up to Trump and limit those really unconscionable and unconstitutional moves and also have a positive vision,” he told HuffPost in March.

Northam initially downplayed the national implications of the race, but soon started incorporating Trump, who he dubbed a “narcissistic maniac,” into his stump speeches. 

“Whatever you call him, we’re not letting him bring his hate into Virginia,” Northam concludes in one of his television advertisements.

He has also gone toe to toe with Perriello on some of his bolder economic proposals, embracing the $15 minimum wage and putting forward his own free community college plan ― albeit one that, unlike his opponent’s, requires community service. 


If Northam wins tomorrow, you won’t hear much about Dominion any more, because Northam wouldn’t make that an issue.
Quentin Kidd, Christopher Newport University
For some progressive activist supporters of Perriello, however, his early involvement in the anti-Trump resistance won them over. Perriello’s presence at Dulles Airport to protest Trump’s first travel ban in January and participation in subsequent rallies against the executive order made an impression on Virginia Democratic National Committee member Yasmine Taeb, who is now a vocal supporter of his.

“He has been very committed to running a grassroots, bottom-to-top campaign,” said Taeb, who lobbies on civil liberties issues for the Friends Committee on National Legislation. “He looks to us for guidance, not the other way around.”

Taeb, like many of Perriello’s most enthusiastic supporters, backed Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary.

For several reasons though, Sanders’ insurgent challenge to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is not an apt parallel for the Perriello-Northam matchup.

Perriello spent years ensconced in the Democratic Party firmament, including as head of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. And the bid of Sanders acolyte Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), to chair the Democratic National Committee was actively combatted by former President Barack Obama and his aides. But Perriello has attracted the endorsements of more than 30 Obama White House veterans, including close the former president’s confidante Valerie Jarrett. (Northam appealed to former Attorney General Eric Holder to ask Obama not to intervene in the race himself, according to The New York Times.)

Perriello, a Charlottesville native, became a darling of national Democrats during his time in Congress in 2009-10 for voting enthusiastically for the stimulus package and the Affordable Care Act, in spite of his conservative district, which included a large swath of rural Southside Virginia.

Obama campaigned for him in his 2010 reelection bid, which Perriello has publicized heavily in his current campaign ads. That anger over the ACA ultimately cost Perriello his seat only improved his standing in the party.But Perriello’s time in Congress was also marked by attempts to triangulate on hot-button social issues. He earned an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association during his 2010 reelection campaign and received a $6,000 donation from the influential group based in Fairfax, Virginia.

More troubling still for some progressives was Perriello’s vote for the Stupak-Pitts Amendment to the ACA, which would have denied federal funding from the new law to any health insurance plans that cover abortions.

Perriello has since dubbed the NRA a “nut-job extremist organization” and embraced greater gun safety regulations.

He has also expressed “regret” for his vote for Stupak-Pitts, claiming he was honoring a promise to constituents to ensure the ACA complied with the Hyde Amendment, a law barring federal funding of abortions. Now the former congressman has embraced the complete abortion rights agenda and is proposing enshrining a woman’s right to an abortion in Virginia’s state constitution as a backstop against a Supreme Court ruling that overturns federal protections for the procedure.


It is really disturbing to see this play out in Virginia, where the candidate who is considered more progressive has a murky history on abortion rights and Bernie is saying it is an optional part of being progressive.
Erin Matson
But some reproductive rights activists still do not trust Perriello, claiming he has yet to be tested by a vote on the matter since his change of heart. Revelations that in 2004, Periello, a practicing Catholic, co-founded Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, a social justice group that has compared abortion to torture and war have only heightened advocates’ suspicions. The Perriello campaign claims he has nonetheless always been pro-abortion rights. 

Northam, by contrast, has a record of only ever supporting abortion rights, and played a key role in the fight to kill the trans-vaginal ultrasound bill as a state senator in 2012. NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia cited Northam’s record in its statement endorsing him. 

“This is about trust. I know exactly who Ralph Northam is, and I know exactly what Northam will do as governor. He will not stick his fingers up in the air to see which way the political wind is blowing,” said Erin Matson, a Virginia-based reproductive rights activist who supports Northam.

For Matson, the primary is a test of the Democratic Party’s commitment to abortion rights at a time when top lawmakers ranging from Sanders to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have loudly proclaimed that Democrats who oppose abortion are welcome in the party.

“It is really disturbing to see this play out in Virginia, where the candidate who is considered more progressive has a murky history on abortion rights and Bernie is saying it is an optional part of being progressive,” Matson said. In a further twist of the race’s complicated narrative though, Northam has admitted to voting twice for former President George W. Bush, who appointed two anti-abortion justices to the Supreme Court. In 2011, he also called health care a “privilege.” (He claims he was not following politics closely during the Bush years, and now considers health care a “right.”)

On other issues, like overturning Virginia’s status as a right-to-work state, which Perriello supports, but Northam has demurred on, the contrast between the two candidates is clearer.

One way or another, Perriello’s chances of winning depend on expanding the electorate, since he enjoys the greatest advantages among young people, new voters and Democrats in Southside and Southwestern Virginia who have not voted regularly in primaries, according to Kidd of Christopher Newport University.

Northam’s support is concentrated in more reliable Democratic constituencies, including older Democrats and black voters, particularly in central and Southeast Virginia, Kidd added. The key battleground, he said, is in the Washington suburbs of Northern Virginia, where Perriello has been campaigning most heavily in the final weeks. 

“There was this pent up energy in the electorate for an alternative to Northam that Perriello tapped into. And that pent up energy has the capacity to surprise people, if the expanded electorate turns out,” Kidd concluded. “That’s the key.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

Highmark Health, Allegheny Health Network, Announce Major Investment in Cancer Services

$
0
0
Pittsburgh-based Highmark Health and AHN will invest more than $200 million in the next two years to enhance access to cancer services, and will expand their relationship with Johns Hopkins Medicine.

PITTSBURGH, Pa. (PRWEB) June 13, 2017

Building on Allegheny Health Network’s (AHN) legacy as a provider of innovative, world-class cancer care, Highmark Health today announced plans to invest more than $200 million over the next two years to further enhance access to leading-edge oncology services in the western Pennsylvania region, as well as other markets served by the organization, including Central PA, Delaware and West Virginia.

Included in the strategic plan is construction of a state-of-the-art academic cancer institute facility on the campus of Allegheny General Hospital (AGH), the establishment of additional community-based cancer treatment centers across western PA, investments in new technologies, and an expansion of Highmark and AHN’s relationship with the world-renowned Johns Hopkins Medicine.

The broadened collaboration with Johns Hopkins Medicine will offer AHN cancer patients and Highmark members even greater access to the unique expertise of the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center team and novel therapies being explored through the Center’s clinical trials research program.

“Highmark Health and Allegheny Health Network are committed to ensuring that all cancer patients in the regions we serve have convenient, affordable access to the highest level of cancer care possible,” said David Holmberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highmark Health. “By almost every measure, the cancer program at Allegheny Health Network has long been one of the nation’s best in terms of the quality and sophistication of the care it provides. Today we are taking a major step forward to further strengthen that tradition in order to meet the market demand of our patients, members and communities in the years ahead.”

The new cancer institute at AGH will serve as the hub for AHN’s cancer-related academic and research activities as well as house the hospital’s quaternary medical and radiation oncology programs. AHN expects to break ground on the project by the end of 2017.

Locations for AHN’s new community-based cancer treatment centers, which will offer medical and radiation oncology care, are currently being finalized, with construction also anticipated to start by the end of the year. Together, the half dozen or so new facilities are expected to add as many as 175 new healthcare jobs in the region, in addition to the many construction jobs the projects will support.

AHN currently offers a range of comprehensive cancer care, including hematology, medical, radiation and surgical oncology, with more than 50 clinics at 23 sites across the greater western PA area. The Network partners with independent community hospitals at 10 of those locations.

As part of the expanded relationship with Johns Hopkins Medicine, AHN cancer patients will have enhanced local access to clinical trials being led by the Hopkins team, including some that will be offered in western PA. Combined, the two cancer programs have more than 600 active clinical trials.

Other collaborations in effect between the two organizations as part of the agreement include:· Remote consultation and second opinions at Johns Hopkins Medicine, with streamlined and guided access for AHN patients to Johns Hopkins Medicine
· Peer-to-peer consultations on general clinical issues and treatment options
· Participation in Grand Rounds presentations and case study reviews
· Development of technological innovations to treat cancer and provide patients with access to unique technologies and treatments at Johns Hopkins Medicine for rare and complex adult and pediatric cancers, including Hopkins’ Proton Beam Therapy program when it launches in 2019
· Advanced molecular testing provided by Johns Hopkins Medicine to guide more personalized and effective treatment of AHN patients diagnosed with late-stage malignancies
· A new referral collaboration with Johns Hopkins Medicine for patients requiring lung and pediatric bone marrow transplantation

The new agreement also establishes Johns Hopkins Medicine as a Preferred Referral Partner for Highmark patients for rare and complex adult and pediatric cancers. The partnership includes a concierge program committed to helping members understand their benefits and, if needed, coordinate travel and streamline care at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore at the best possible value.

“We are honored to be working with the oncologists at Allegheny toward our shared goal of providing the best cancer care for their patients,” says Paul Rothman, M.D., Dean of the Medical Faculty and CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine "Additionally, we are pleased to now also be Highmark's Preferred Referral Partner, including across Highmark's Blue Card Network in western Pennsylvania as well as West Virginia and Delaware." Johns Hopkins Medicine is a Blue Distinction Center for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association.

Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the United States, and as the population ages, the number of new cancer cases is expected to grow significantly. There were 1.685 million new cancer cases in 2016, with a 50% increase expected over the next decade to more than 2.3 million annually. In addition, as screening and treatment methods improve, the number of cancer survivors is expected to rise from 11.7 million in 2007 to 18 million in 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

“Collaboration among doctors and among institutions is essential to winning the war against this formidable disease,” said David Parda, M.D., Chair, AHN Cancer Institute. “The partnership between Highmark Health, AHN and Johns Hopkins Medicine is an excellent example of how like-minded organizations can come together, share knowledge and resources, and develop new paradigms for care and coverage that advance our capabilities and have a meaningful impact on the lives of our patients.”

###

About Highmark Health
Highmark Health, a Pittsburgh, PA based enterprise that employs more than 40,000 people nationwide and serves nearly 50 million Americans in all 50 states, is the second largest integrated health care delivery and financing network in the nation based on revenue. Highmark Health is the parent company of Highmark Inc., Allegheny Health Network, and HM Health Solutions. Highmark Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates provide health insurance to nearly 5 million members in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware as well as dental insurance, vision care and related health products through a national network of diversified businesses that include United Concordia Companies, HM Insurance Group, Davis Vision and Visionworks. Allegheny Health Network is the parent company of an integrated delivery network that includes eight hospitals, more than 2,800 affiliated physicians, ambulatory surgery centers, an employed physician organization, home and community-based health services, a research institute, a group purchasing organization, and health and wellness pavilions in western Pennsylvania. HM Health Solutions focuses on meeting the information technology platform and other business needs of the Highmark Health enterprise as well as unaffiliated health insurance plans by providing proven business processes, expert knowledge and integrated cloud-based platforms. To learn more, please visit http://www.highmarkhealth.org.

About Allegheny Health Network & the AHN Cancer Institute
Allegheny Health Network is a western Pennsylvania-based integrated healthcare system that serves patients from across a five state region that includes Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland and New York. The AHN Cancer Institute offers a complete spectrum of oncology care, including access to state-of-the-art technologies and new therapies being explored in clinical cancer trials. AHN Cancer Institute provides care at seven hospitals and more than 50 clinics serving patients from western Pennsylvania, Erie, West Virginia and Ohio. Certified by the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI), reflecting AHN’s high performance level in all areas, AHN is also the only regional cancer center accredited by the American College of Radiology and the National Accreditation Program for Breast Cancer. AHN hospitals achieved 97 to 98 percent compliance with best practices for cancer care – compared to just 90 percent statewide – as reported by the Commission on Cancer’s Cancer Program Practice Profile Reports. AHN physicians are leaders in the nation’s largest breast cancer clinical trials group, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, and participate in hundreds of additional cancer clinical trials.

About Johns Hopkins Medicine and Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center
The Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center is one of the nation’s 69 cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute, and one of the first to earn that status. Research led by its faculty is among the most highly cited in cancer research and clinical care and has pioneered fields such as cancer genetics, bone marrow transplant medicine and cancer immunotherapy.
Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM), headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, is an $8 billion integrated global health enterprise and one of the leading academic health care systems in the United States. JHM unites physicians and scientists of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine with the organizations, health professionals and facilities of The Johns Hopkins Hospital and Health System. JHM’s vision, “Together, we will deliver the promise of medicine,” is supported by its mission to improve the health of the community and the world by setting the standard of excellence in medical education, research and clinical care. Diverse and inclusive, JHM educates medical students, scientists, health care professionals and the public; conducts biomedical research; and provides patient-centered medicine to prevent, diagnose and treat human illness. JHM operates six academic and community hospitals, four suburban health care and surgery centers, and 40 primary and specialty care outpatient sites under the umbrella of Johns Hopkins Community Physicians. JHM extends health care into the community and globally through Johns Hopkins Home Care Group, Johns Hopkins Medicine International and Johns Hopkins HealthCare. The Johns Hopkins Hospital, opened in 1889, has been ranked #1 in the nation by U.S. News & World Report for 22 years of the survey’s 27-year history. For more information about Johns Hopkins Medicine; its research, education and clinical programs; and for the latest health, science and research news, visit http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org. Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Trump says heath care dropouts sign that Democrats 'gave up'

$
0
0
About 16 percent of consumers who signed up for coverage this year through health insurance markets had canceled by early spring, continuing a trend also reflected during the Obama years. Figures released from the Health and Human Services Department on Monday show that 10.3 million people were signed up and paying their premiums as of March 15. Reported by SeattlePI.com 10 hours ago.

Obamacare Death Spiral: First 2018 Coverage Map Reveals At Least 47 Counties With No Coverage

$
0
0
Obamacare Death Spiral: First 2018 Coverage Map Reveals At Least 47 Counties With No Coverage Earlier today the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the first projected county-by-county map of Obamacare coverage for the 2018 plan year which depicts at least 47 counties, with 35,000 active Obamacare exchange participants, that will have no health insurance options next year.  Meanwhile, another 2.4 million people are expected to have only 1 option for coverage. Per CMS:



The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is releasing a county-level map of 2018 projected Health Insurance Exchanges participation based on the known issuer participation public announcements through June 9, 2017. *This map shows that insurance options on the Exchanges continue to disappear. Plan options are down from last year and, in some areas, Americans will have no coverage options on the Exchanges, based on the current data. *

 

The CMS map displays point in time data and is expected to fluctuate as issuers continue to make announcements on exiting or entering specific states and counties. *It currently shows that nationwide 47 counties are projected to have no insurers*, meaning that Americans in these counties could be without coverage on the Exchanges for 2018. *It’s also projected that as many as 1,200 counties - nearly 40% of counties nationwide – could have only one issuer in 2018.* Currently, for 2018 at least 35,000 active Exchange participants live in the counties projected to be without coverage in 2018, and roughly 2.4 million Exchange participants are projected to have one issuer.  It’s expected that the number of consumers with no coverage choices will rise.



 

Of course, insurers are still in the process of determining which markets they'll serve in 2018 so the map above could theoretically get much worse.  As our readers are acutely aware, the overwhelming trend has been toward more withdrawals rather than less.  Here are just a couple of our recent notes on the topic.

· Obamacare Implosion: Last Major Healthcare Provider Pulls Out Of Iowa Leaving No Options In 2018
· Aetna Abandons Obamacare Totally: See You In September?
· Largest U.S. Health Insurer Is Done With Obamacare: UnitedHealth To Exit Most State Exchanges

As CMS Administrator Seema Verma points out, *CMS and insurance commissioners around the country are working to slow the collapse of Obamacare but unilateral actions are by no means a "long-term solution" for a system which has clearly failed. *



*“This is yet another failing report card for the Exchanges. The American people have fewer insurance choices and in some counties no choice at all.* CMS is working with state departments of insurance and issuers to find ways to provide relief and help restore access to healthcare plans, but our actions are by no means a long-term solution to the problems we’re seeing with the Insurance Exchanges,” said CMS Administrator Seema Verma.



Meanwhile, as Credit Suisse analyst Scott Fidel points out today, Obamacare attrition levels continue to deteriorate year after year...which is probably not terribly surprising given the exponential premium increases.



*Paid exchange members are down ~15% from 2017 OEP sign-ups: *This afternoon the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the February Effectuated Enrollment Snapshot. Effectuated enrollment (after premiums paid and any attrition) ended February at 10.3 million, or -15.4% below the 2017 Open Enrollment Period’s (OEP) ending number of plan selections of 12.2 mln. *These attrition levels are slightly worse than the effectuated enrollment levels one-month following the 2016 and 2015 OEPs, which were down -12.6% (or -14.6% using revised 2016 data per below) and -12.8% respectively.*

 

CMS provides updated & complete 2016 effectuated enrollment: In addition to the February 2017 data, CMS also provided updated and complete 2016 effectuated enrollment data. Recall, the prior administration stopped provided the quarterly effectuated enrollment updates after March 2016. As a result, we estimate that effectuated enrollment ended December 2016 at 9.1 mln, or -28.1% below the 2016 OEP ending plan selections of 12.7 mln. This attrition was worse than the 2015 effectuated enrollment at year-end which was 8.8 mln at December 2015, or -24.9% below the 2015 OEP plan selections of 11.7 mln.



Of course we suspect this stark reminder of the 'health' of the exchanges* will have a minimal impact on Democrats who will continue to hail the 'great accomplishments' of Obamacare while the system literally, and quite tangibly, collapses in epic fashion all around them.*  The ability to blindly and shamelessly support a partisan cause irrestpective of overwhelming facts proving the ineffectiveness of that cause is truly a talent reserved only for politicians. Reported by Zero Hedge 6 hours ago.

Centene to expand participation in health care exchange

$
0
0
Centene Corporation said Tuesday that it will enter the Affordable Care Act's Health Insurance Marketplaces in three additional states in 2018, and will expand its offerings in six states. Centene is planning to enter Missouri, Kansas and Nevada in 2018, and will expand in Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Ohio, Texas and Washington. Last year, Centene served 537,200 exchange members, and counted 1.2 million members as of April 2017, the company said. Centene said that 90 percent of its members are eligible… Reported by bizjournals 8 hours ago.

Premier 'to evaluate' future on health insurance exchange

$
0
0
Dayton's biggest hospital group can't say for sure if it's going to be on the Ohio Health Insurance Exchange in 2018. After three years as a presence on the Ohio health insurance marketplace created under the Affordable Care Act, Premier Health is reviewing its options for next year. Asked if it planned to continue offering plans on the exchange next year, the company only said is it evaluating its future. "Like all other insurance companies, we continue to evaluate (the) environment as we plan… Reported by bizjournals 7 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images