Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

New Tip Sheet From Austin Sports Medicine Team Offers Advice on Saving Money by Utilizing Health Insurance Benefits

$
0
0
Medicine in Motion reminds patients to take full advantage of health insurance benefits before end of year

Austin, Texas (PRWEB) November 15, 2016

The Austin sports medicine team at Medicine in Motion is reminding patients that as the New Year approaches, it’s time to pull out the healthcare plan paperwork to review coverage and assess how many unused insurance benefits remain. Whether it was a self-purchased plan or sponsored by an employer, most people can benefit by taking a few minutes for an insurance plan evaluation.

“With the holidays upon us, it’s easy to forget to take advantage of your annual benefits, but patients can save hundreds of dollars by using their health insurance benefits before the end of the year,” said Dr. Martha Pyron, owner of Medicine in Motion. “Most insurance plans run on a calendar year, so now is the time to use-them or lose-them. You’ve worked hard for your health care benefits – make sure you take advantage of it.”

Here is a look at eight points to remember for saving money in conjunction with health insurance:

1. Annual Benefits – Any benefits with a calendar limit should be taken advantage of before the end of the year. These may include certain types of checkups and preventative health services.

2. Disappearing Benefits – Carefully read through the insurance information provided by the employer and/or insurance company after enrolling to see if any benefits are changing with the New Year. If some are being reduced or outright eliminated, get the most of the current coverage before treatment costs go up.

3. Health Savings Accounts (HSA) – An HSA is a medical savings account available to those who are enrolled in a high-deductible health plan. Funds contributed to an HSA aren’t subject to income tax at the time of deposit. A contributor can maximize tax savings by fulling funding their HSA account. Unused HSA funds will rollover and continue to grow each year.

4. Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA) – This is an account established through employers for employees to place some of their pre-tax dollars into. Unlike HSA funds, unspent FSA money will NOT rollover, so it’s important to utilize those contributions before they’re gone. FSA dollars can be used for annual physicals, as co-payments for doctor visits, prescription refills, eyes exams and much more.

5. Deductibles - The deductible is the amount of money that a patient must pay their health provider out of pocket before the insurance company will pay for any services. This fee varies from one plan to another and could be higher if a patient chooses an out-of-network doctor. Deductibles also reset when plans roll over with a new year, so those who have met their deductibles for the current year should attempt to continue or finish treatment before the fees return.

6. Premiums - If a patient is paying his or her health insurance premiums every month, they should be using their benefits. Even if there are no signs of problems, patients should always have their annual checkups and exams as a measure of prevention and to detect any early signs of health issues that cannot be detected without a professional healthcare provider.

7. Health Problems Can Worsen - By delaying treatment or even a checkup, patients are risking more extensive and expensive treatment in the future. What may be a simple ailment now could turn into a much bigger and costlier health issue later.

8. Long Term Care – Insured individuals may want to confer with their employer or health insurance company to see if they offer any wellness incentives or gym membership discounts. Taking advantage of these types of health initiatives can save cash in the short term, but they can also save money in the long term by improving physical fitness and, therefore, keeping medical and insurance costs down.

Medicine in Motion (MIM) specializes in providing top quality sports medicine in Austin, Texas, for athletic individuals of all ages and levels. The staff at MIM believes active bodies are healthy bodies, therefore it is the office's goal to keep patients energetic and fit. To that end, MIM provides treatment of injuries and illnesses, including the use of physical rehabilitation; promotes healthy living with personal training and nutrition coaching; and offers comprehensive sports medicine evaluations to optimize health, activity level and sports performance. For more information or for questions regarding sports medicine in Austin, contact Medicine in Motion at 512-257-2500 or visit the website at http://www.medinmotion.com. Reported by PRWeb 6 hours ago.

ACA Form 1095 & 1094: New ez1095 2016 Software Is Now Available from Halfpricesoft.com

$
0
0
Ez1095 2016 software is now available and makes it easy to print and file ACA Form 1095 C, 1094 C, 1095 B & 1094 B. Customers can now test drive ez1095 software for 30 days at no cost or obligation at http://www.halfpricesoft.com.

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) November 15, 2016

Halfpricesoft.com developer’s have just released the 2016 version of ez1095 to the US. Companies and accountants seeking an easier way to file the ACA form 1095 and 1094 can download the latest ez1095 software and begin processing immediately. Ez1095 software can prepare and print form 1095 B, 1094 B, 1095 C and 1095 B.

Current customers of the 2015 version can easily roll data forward from last year to this year in record time. This software remains compatible with Windows 10, 8.1, 8, 7, Vista, XP and other Windows systems.

“Developers at Halfpricesoft.com have just released the 2016 version of ez1095 software for the upcoming tax season,” said Dr. Ge, the founder of Halfpricesoft.com.

The quick start guide for ez1095 software allows for easy installation and easy setup. ez1095 2016 software’s graphical interface leads customers step-by-step through setting up company, adding employees, add forms and print forms. Customers can also click form level help links to get more details regarding the software.

Potential customers can download and try this software at no obligation by visiting http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/form-1095-software-free-download.asp

The main features include:· Print ACA forms 1095 and 1094 on blank paper with inkjet or laser printer.
· Print Form 1095 C: Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Insurance
· Print Form 1094 C: Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns
· Print Form 1095-B: Health Coverage
· Print Form 1094-B: Transmittal of Health Coverage Information Return
· Print recipient copies in PDF format.
· Support unlimited companies.
· Support unlimited number of recipients.
· Print unlimited number of 1095 and 1094 forms.
· Fast data import feature

Priced at just $195, ($295.00 for efile feature) this ACA forms filing software saves employers time and money. To learn more about ez1095 ACA software, customers can visit http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/aca-1095-software.asp

About halfpricesoft.com

Founded in 2003, Halfpricesoft.com has established itself as a leader in meeting the software needs of small businesses around the world with its payroll software, employee attendance tracking software, check printing software, W2 software, 1099 software and barcode generating software. It continues to grow with its philosophy that small business owners need affordable, user friendly, super simple, and totally risk-free software. Reported by PRWeb 4 hours ago.

ISRAEL AS AN APARTHEID, REPRESSIVE, MILITARIST STATE? HARDLY

$
0
0
The anti-Israel left, which supports boycott and sanctions of Israel, paints it as a repressive, apartheid and militarist state. While Israel is hardly perfect, it is a democratic, First World, high-tech, modern state governed by the rule of law that applies to Jews and Arabs, men and women.

By contrast, from 1789 to the Jacksonian revolution of 1828, American voting was restricted to property-owning white males who paid taxes. In some areas these requirements remained until 1856. The great majority of African-Americans were slaves until 1865 and the vast majority could not vote until 1965. Universal suffrage for women did not come until 1920.

In 1917 the October Revolution transformed authoritarian Russia into a repressive Communist state until 1991. Germany, semi-democratic after 1871, devolved into Nazi Germany (1933-1945) that carried out the Holocaust and killed 27 million Russians in World War II. Italy, ruled by a fascist government from 1922-1943, fought on the side of Nazi Germany and became democratic only after World War II. China, after the 1949 Revolution, was and remains a one party authoritarian regime.

The vast majority of new states after 1945 were poor, authoritarian regimes that often repressed their minorities. Israel was one of only two of over 100 new states (the other being India), that remained democratic from the start. Hebrew and Arabic were the official languages and all Jews and Arabs could vote. An Arab party existed from the start and today an Arab party has the third largest number of delegates (16) in the Knesset.

Israel, unlike authoritarian states, won the wars for survival and then made, or was prepared to make, withdrawals from Arab territory. In 1948, 1956 and 1967 Israel conquered Gaza yet in 1949, 1957 and 2005 unilaterally withdrew from Gaza. In the 1967 Six Day War it took the Sinai peninsula from Egypt and withdrew in 1982 after the Camp David peace conference in 1979. After driving the PLO out of Lebanon and defeating the Syrians in 1982 Israel withdrew from Southern Lebanon in 2000.

As for the two remaining Arab areas under Israeli control, Israel has repeatedly made offers to yield the Golan Heights rejected by Syria. It has made generous offers to withdraw from the West Bank in 2000 and 2008 and trade territory in exchange for small territories it wishes to keep.

This willingness to negotiate came even before it became a state. In 1937 the small Zionist movement considered a proposal of the British Peel Commission, even though the vast majority oft he disputed territory (88%) would go to the Arabs. The Arabs refused to accept it. In November 1947 the United Nations voted to create a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews accepted and the Arabs not only rejected the UN proposal but five Arab states invaded the new state of Israel in May, 1948.

After victory in the 1967 Six Day War the Israelis offered to negotiate with the Arabs but the Arabs responded with three nos--no peace, no negotiations and no recognition. In 1979 the American sponsored Camp David Accords led to peace with Egypt and Israeli withdrawal from the Sinai peninsula. In 1994 Israel signed a peace agreement with Jordan. In 2000 at Camp David II the Israelis offered a generous resolution of the conflict. Arafat refused to take the deal. And again in 2008 Ehud Olmert offered to return over 90% of the West Bank and part of Israeli territory
but the Arabs refused the deal.

Finally how are Israeli Arabs treated by Israel? Hardly as an apartheid state. In the early years (1949-1965) they were under military occupation though still having rights. There remain job discrimination and a feeling that they are a minority. Polling shows that 55% of Israeli Arabs would rather live in Israel than any other country. They like the rule of law, democracy, citizenship, longer life expectation, good universities and schools, universal health insurance and First World economy. Over 100,000 West Bank Arabs have moved into Israel over the years
while 25% of West Bank Arabs and nearly 50% of Gaza Arabs want to leave the Arab world altogether.

Israel is far from perfect. But, compared to the highly authoritarian and largely impoverished states in the Middle East (save for the petro-states), it has done far better than the surrounding Arab world in dealing with its Arab citizens and maintaining Western values.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 22 hours ago.

GOP Health Insurance Alternatives May Wind Up Using Penalties Like The Mandate

$
0
0
Republicans dislike the health law's requirement to have insurance or pay a fine. But if they want to keep the ban on preexisting conditions, they need to find a way to make customers purchase a plan. Reported by NPR 22 hours ago.

How Trump may cover Americans with pre-existing conditions

$
0
0
President-elect Donald Trump promises that Americans with pre-existing conditions will have access to health insurance, even after he dismantles Obamacare. Reported by CNNMoney 22 hours ago.

How Trump health plan may cover pre-existing conditions

$
0
0
President-elect Donald Trump promises that Americans with pre-existing conditions will have access to health insurance, even after he dismantles Obamacare. But some experts question whether his plan would work. Reported by CNNMoney 22 hours ago.

Not Just Obamacare: Medicaid, Medicare Also On GOP's Chopping Block

$
0
0
Donald Trump and Republican leaders in Congress have made clear they are serious about repealing Obamacare, and doing so quickly. But don’t assume their dismantling of government health insurance programs will stop there.

For about two decades now, Republicans have been talking about radically changing the government’s two largest health insurance programs, Medicaid and Medicare.

The goal with Medicaid is to turn the program almost entirely over to the states, but with less money to run it. The goal with Medicare is to convert it from a government-run insurance program into a voucher system ― while, once again, reducing the money that goes into the program.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has championed these ideas for years. Trump has not. In fact, in a 2015 interview his campaign website highlighted, he vowed that “I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid.” But the health care agenda on Trump’s transition website, which went live Thursday, vows to “modernize Medicare” and allow more “flexibility” for Medicaid.

In Washington, those are euphemisms for precisely the kind of Medicare and Medicaid plans Ryan has long envisioned. And while it’s never clear what Trump really thinks or how he’ll act, it sure looks like both he and congressional Republicans are out to undo Lyndon Johnson’s health care legacy, not just Barack Obama’s.

Of course, whenever Trump or Republicans talk about dismantling existing government programs, they insist they will replace them with something better ― implying that the people who depend on those programs now won’t be worse off.

But Republicans are not trying to replicate what Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act do now. Nor are they trying to maintain the current, historically high level of health coverage nationwide that these programs have produced. Their goal is to slash government spending on health care and to peel back regulations on parts of the health care industry, particularly insurers.

This would mean lower taxes, and an insurance market that operates with less government interference. It would also reduce how many people get help paying for health coverage, and make it so that those who continue to receive government-sponsored health benefits will get less help than they do now.

It’s difficult to be precise about the real-world effects, because the Republican plans for replacing existing government insurance programs remain so undefined. Ryan’s “A Better Way” proposal is a broad, 37-page outline without dollar figures, and Senate Republican leaders have never produced an actual Obamacare “replacement” plan.

But the Republican plans in circulation, along with the vague ― and shifting ― health care principles Trump endorsed during the campaign, have common themes. And from those it’s possible to glean a big-picture idea of what a fully realized version of the Republican health care agenda would mean.

-*Obamacare*-

Obamacare has expanded and bolstered health insurance mainly through two sets of changes: a straightforward expansion of Medicaid eligibility, which the 31 states and the District of Columbia now offer, and a makeover of the insurance market for people buying private coverage on their own rather than through employers. The net effect of the Affordable Care Act is an estimated 20 million fewer uninsured than before the law.

Obamacare’s makeover included writing new rules for insurers: All policies must now include comprehensive benefits, for example, and carriers can no longer deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions nor charge them higher rates than healthy people.

The newly reformed insurance system also offers subsidies: to assist people who could never afford coverage before; and to offset the higher prices insurers charge now that they must cover more services, without turning away the people most likely to use them.

Repealing the law outright would increase the number of uninsured Americans by 22 million, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Republicans have vowed to replace Obamacare with something better ― “great health care for much less money,” as Trump put it on “60 Minutes” Sunday.

But GOP plans would scale back the federal commitment to Medicaid, then unwind the changes to the individual insurance market by reducing the regulations on coverage. GOP plans would also eliminate the health insurance exchanges through which more than 10 million people get access to private insurance and those all-important subsidies. Republican schemes envision new forms of financial assistance, but generally lower income people would get less money, and (depending on the details) many middle-income people would too.

Some of the regulatory changes would be indirect. Allowing insurers to sell across state lines ― an idea Trump mentioned frequently ― would let all insurers relocate to states with the fewest rules, effectively gutting requirements more progressive states might impose on coverage. Overall, the result would be less coverage and protection than Obamacare provides.

And while some people would benefit, others would suffer. To take one example, healthy 25-year-olds could buy cheaper, skimpier policies than the law now allows. But 55-year-olds with high blood pressure would tend to face higher premiums ― because insurers could resume charging them more ― and bigger copayments at the pharmacy.  

Republicans talk a lot about preserving Obamacare’s most popular provisions, like protections for people with pre-existing conditions. 

But the fine print of their proposals shows their guarantee is different ― and less ironclad. Insurers could still turn away people who don’t maintain “continuous coverage.” That’s no small thing. People who lose jobs frequently let coverage lapse ― and it’d happen more commonly in a world without the generous financial assistance Obamacare provides.

Conservatives say they have a solution for this: They would create special insurance plans, called “high-risk pools,” for people insurers won’t cover.

This idea has been tried before, at the state level ― and it didn’t work very well. The plans typically offered weaker coverage at higher prices, and required vast infusions of money that state governments rarely provided. Tellingly, Ryan’s budget allocates just $25 billion over 10 years for high-risk pools.* *Even conservative experts believe it would take far more money for the pools to be the viable alternatives that Republicans imagine.

In September, RAND Corp. researchers analyzed Trump’s health care reform principles and determined that his plan would increase the number of uninsured by 16 million to 25 million people, with a particularly tough impact on people with serious medical conditions who would face higher out-of-pocket charges.

That’s a very rough guess, and a worst-case scenario. You can find analysts who make assumptions more favorable to conservative plans and end up more sanguine about the results. But the basic effect of all GOP replacement plans is clear: fewer people with insurance, less protection for people who have it, or some mix of the two.-*Medicaid*-

As of August, 73 million Americans had benefits from Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which doesn’t break up the numbers for the two programs. All but around 16 million of them are covered by pre-Obamacare rules, but all Medicaid beneficiaries stand to be affected by the GOP’s plans.

Until the Affordable Care Act, working-age adults without disabilities were ineligible for this benefit in most cases, with some exceptions, including low-income pregnant women and very poor parents of children who qualified for Medicaid or CHIP.

As an entitlement like Medicare and Social Security, Medicaid gets however much money it takes to cover the medical expenses for everyone enrolled.

Over a 10-year time period, the Medicaid plan the House Budget Committee approved this year would reduce federal spending on the program by about one-third, or roughly $1 trillion, not even counting the effects of repealing Obamacare’s expansion of the program, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Repealing the Affordable Care Act and its Medicaid expansion fully would eliminate the coverage for the roughly 16 million people the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports have enrolled under this policy.

The federal government paid for 62 percent of the $532 billion in Medicaid expenditures in fiscal year 2015, the most recent year for which such a breakdown is available. In 25 states, the federal share of spending is higher still, so even states that may want to maintain today’s Medicaid benefits would find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to replace the federal dollars that would disappear under GOP proposals.

One result could be 25 million fewer Medicaid beneficiaries, according to the RAND Corp.’s analysis of Trump’s plans.

Trump and other Republicans have long promoted “flexibility” that would enable states, which jointly finance and manage Medicaid with the federal government, to alter the program.

While this may seem on its face like simple federalism, the purpose is not to allow states to cover as many people as they do now in different ways, but to significantly reduce federal spending on Medicaid and to permit states to cut back on who can receive Medicaid coverage and what kind of benefits they have.

Ryan’s latest version of this 35-year-old idea would establish either “block grants” to states ― that is, a flat amount of money each state would get from the federal government each year to spend on Medicaid as they like ― or “per capita allotment” ― meaning a flat amount of money for each person enrolled. These approaches would differ in terms of how much money states would receive yearly and how much the funding would increase from year to year.

In any case, the funding wouldn’t be high enough to maintain current coverage, inevitably leading to millions of currently covered individuals losing their benefits. And the financing would grow at a slower rate than health care costs, portending more lost coverage over time. For those who remain on Medicaid, Ryan would permit states to charge them monthly premiums and add other strings, such as a work requirement.

On top of all that, CHIP must be reauthorized next year, so those benefits could be at risk, too. Ryan’s “A Better Way” proposal, for example, would cut federal spending for the program, although not as drastically as it does for Medicaid.

-*Medicare*-

The Medicare revamp in “A Better Way” would result in wholesale changes to the entitlement ― ones that would realize Ryan’s long-term goal of privatizing the program.

Today, most of the 55 million Medicare beneficiaries enroll in the traditional, government-run program and then buy private supplemental insurance to cover remaining out-of-pocket costs. A sizable minority opts to buy private insurance plans, through the Medicare Advantage program. The government regulates these plans tightly, to make sure they provide coverage at least as generous as the traditional Medicare program does.

Ryan would replace this arrangement with a “premium support” system, under which each senior would get an allotment of money ― a voucher, in other words ― he can use to get insurance. When Ryan introduced the first formal version of his proposal, in 2010, he envisioned ending the traditional government program altogether. Now he says it should continue to exist alongside the private plans, competing with them for business.

What would this mean for beneficiaries? A great deal would depend on details Ryan has yet to provide, particularly when it comes to the value of that voucher ― and how quickly it would increase every year ― compared to the cost of the insurance. But the whole point of the system is to ratchet down the value of the vouchers over time.

That would reduce spending on Medicare, which Ryan always says is a goal, and some seniors would likely end up saving money, because they could easily switch to cheaper plans. The question would be what happens to everybody else. Without adequate regulation of benefits and other safeguards tailored to the special needs of an older, frequently impaired population of seniors, the consequence of moving to premium support could be higher costs for individual seniors who have serious health problems ― with low-income seniors feeling it most intensely.

If at the same time Republicans shrink Medicaid, those seniors will suffer even more, since today the poorest seniors can use the program to pay for whatever medical bills Medicare does not.

Ryan promises that the proposal would not affect seniors who are 55 or older, since the new system wouldn’t begin operating for 10 years. But realistically the entire Medicare program would change once premium support took effect ― private plans would almost certainly find ways to pick off the healthiest seniors, for instance ― and, at best, the damage would simply take longer to play out.

Ryan’s Medicare scheme includes one other element ― a provision to raise the eligibility age gradually, so that seniors would eventually enroll at 67, rather than 65. Particularly in a world in which the Affordable Care Act no longer exists, 65- and 66-year-olds searching for private coverage would find it harder to obtain, more expensive and less generous than what they’d get from Medicare today.

The end result would almost surely be higher out-of-pocket costs for those younger seniors ― and a significant number of them, maybe into the millions, with no insurance at all. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 21 hours ago.

Optima Health Joins The Great American Smokeout

$
0
0
On November 17, Optima Health will support the American Cancer Society Great American Smokeout. Optima Health is providing free materials on its website to help people quit and stay tobacco-free.

Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) November 15, 2016

Life is short, and for those who smoke, quitting returns precious years and vitality. That’s why Optima Health is delighted to announce it is proudly supporting the 2016 American Cancer Society Great American Smokeout. On November 17, Optima Health and parent-company Sentara Healthcare will stand with members, patients, providers and employees, as well as with all members of the community, in support of those who pledge to go tobacco-free for 24 hours.

To help people quit and stay tobacco-free, Optima Health has a variety of materials available on its website, and by calling 1-800-SENTARA (1-800-736-8272), including a tobacco cessation resource toolkit, the “Get Off Your Butt: Stay Smokeless For Life” self-paced audio program and workbook, and information on group classes - all offered free of charge. Employer groups insured by Optima Health also have access to on-site tobacco cessation presentations, as well as one-on-one coaching and individual programs. To further demonstrate its commitment to a healthier community, all Optima Health and Sentara Healthcare facilities have been designated tobacco-free campuses for over a decade.

“At 73, I have smoked for over 50 years, and I find myself wondering why I had to go through all the bad stuff – triple by-pass surgery, a surgery on my left leg, a surgery on my right leg – before I decided to quit,” said John Vasilake of Virginia Beach. “There’s something good about the Optima smoking cessation program, and I wish I would have found it sooner,” said Vasilake. “I play the ‘Get Off Your Butt: Stay Smokeless for Life’ audio program at night before I go to sleep, and I find myself not getting up in the morning and lighting up right away. I actually started to leave the cigarettes and lighter in my car, so they’re not as accessible. I haven’t completely kicked the habit, yet, but with all the tools offered by Optima Health, I know I have support, and I know I can do it. I’m ready for November 17, and I’m ready to quit for good!”

Tobacco use remains the single largest preventable cause of disease and premature death in the US, yet about 40 million Americans still smoke cigarettes – that’s about one in every five adults.

The American Cancer Society marks the Great American Smokeout on the third Thursday of November each year by encouraging smokers to use the date to make a plan to quit, or to plan in advance and quit smoking that day. By quitting – even for one day – smokers will be taking an important step towards a healthier life – one that can help lead to reducing cancer risk.

On November 17, join John, Optima Health and millions of Americans who begin living tobacco free.

About Optima Health
Optima Health, based in Virginia, provides health insurance coverage to approximately 450,000 members. With 30 years of experience in the health insurance arena, Optima Health offers a suite of commercial products including consumer-directed, employee-owned and employer-sponsored plans, individual health plans, employee assistance programs and plans serving Medicare and Medicaid enrollees. Our provider network features 26,000 providers including specialists, primary care physicians and hospitals across Virginia. Optima Health offers programs to support members with chronic illnesses, customized wellness programs and integrated clinical and behavioral health services, as well as pharmacy management – all to help our members improve their health. Our goal is to provide better health, be easy to use and offer services that are a great value. To learn more about Optima Health, visit http://www.optimahealth.com.

[1] The membership figure includes total membership in all group and individual insured products, Medicare Managed Care Plans, Medicaid and Famis Plans, and self-funded health plans issued or administered by Optima Health. Total Medical Membership based on Membership History Report, June 2016. Includes members from all Optima Health Licenses, products, Medicare and Medicaid products. Optima Health is the trade name of Optima Health Plan, Optima Health Insurance Company, and Sentara Health Plans, Inc. Optima PPO plans, and Medicare Managed Care Plans are underwritten or administered by Optima Health Insurance Company. Optima Vantage HMO plans, Medicaid, and Famis products are underwritten or administered by Optima Health Plan. Sentara Health Plans provides administrative services to self-funded plans but does not underwrite benefits. Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) are administered by Optima Behavioral Health Services, Inc. Wellness programs are administered by Sentara Health Plans. Source for provider network is Optima Health, Provider Status Report, February 2016. Reported by PRWeb 18 hours ago.

That sick feeling: A painful look at the rise of health insurance costs

$
0
0
Reported by DallasNews 16 hours ago.

HUFFPOST HILL - House Republicans Vote Unanimously To Fight Later

$
0
0
When our grandchildren ask us what we did during the great political unraveling, we will be able to hold our heads high and tell them that we tweeted “oh” above some incendiary content.  Donald Trump has apparently been cribbing 7th grade civics essays, as he began a tweet this morning, “The Electoral College is actually genius in that it…” And Donald Trump’s transition is already in disarray, potentially harming the nation’s defense networks, its economy and Eric Trump’s plans to resurrect Late Night Shots. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Tuesday, November 15th, 2016:

*HOUSE GOP UNANIMOUSLY BACKS RYAN - *Oh, man, the infrastructure battle sure is going to be fun. Susan Cornwell and Susan Heavey: “*U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan was unanimously nominated on Tuesday by his fellow Republicans for re-election as speaker in the new Congress next year, the House Republican Conference said on Twitter.* Ryan, who faced no challengers for the post from within Republican ranks, was nominated during a closed-door meeting of all Republican lawmakers in the House. He will face an election in January, when all members of the new House, both Democrats and Republicans, vote on a new speaker. Republicans kept their majorities in both the House and Senate in the Nov. 8 elections in which voters elected Republican Donald Trump to the White House over Democrat Hillary Clinton. ‘It is a tremendous honor to be nominated by my colleagues to serve as speaker of the House,’ Ryan said on Twitter. ‘Now it’s time to go big.’” [Reuters]

*DEMOCRATS PUT OFF LEADERSHIP VOTE* - Though the party has gotten out of bed for the first time in days, it’s now just staring blankly at a pond, ripping overlarge chunks of bread from a loaf and tossing them listlessly at ducks. Jennifer Bendery and Laura Barron-Lopez: “The most immediate question is whether Pelosi should keep her post. Publicly, Democrats said it’s not her fault that their party got trounced nationally. ‘Ms. Pelosi enjoys great respect and support in the Democratic Caucus,’ said [Rep. G.K.] Butterfield [(D-N.C.)]. ‘This is no reflection on her leadership at all.’ ‘I think she’s done a damn good job,’ said Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.). ‘I think she’s a far better leader than Boehner was to his caucus.’ But some said the election was a wake-up call on the need for major changes. ‘It is past time’ for Pelosi to go, said a Democratic lawmaker who requested anonymity to speak more freely.... *There aren’t obvious replacements for Pelosi, though one name has been floated: Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), who represents the kind of white, working class district that sided so heavily with Trump in the election*. There’s an obvious problem with Ryan, though. ‘We’ve got Trump, [Mitch] McConnell, [Chuck] Schumer, [Paul] Ryan. All these white men,” said another Democrat who asked for anonymity to be more candid. “Are we going to put another white guy in?’” [HuffPost]

*THE DOCTOR WON’T SEE YOU NOW - *Republicans have been telling everyone for years they want to trash Obamacare and severely cut Medicare and Medicaid, so let’s believe them. Jonathan Cohn and Jeffrey Young: “Donald Trump and Republican leaders in Congress have made clear they are serious about repealing Obamacare, and doing so quickly. But don’t assume their dismantling of government health insurance programs will stop there…. But *Republicans are not trying to replicate what Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act do now. Nor are they trying to maintain the current, historically high level of health coverage nationwide that these programs have produced. Their goal is to slash government spending on health care* and to peel back regulations on parts of the health care industry, particularly insurers. [HuffPost]

*Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s new book*, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to huffposthill@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter - @HuffPostHill

*TRUMP’S TRANSITION A TOTAL MESS - * Andrew Restuccia and Nancy Cook: “Top Donald Trump campaign advisers who have taken charge of the president-elect’s transition team are casting aside much of the work on Cabinet picks that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and his aides put in place over several months — and leaving behind a far more chaotic operation dominated by Trump loyalists. Trump aides have nixed at least one Christie-backed person being considered for a Cabinet position in the aftermath of last Friday’s shakeup, a person closely tracking the transition told POLITICO. *The transition team has yet to publicly release a code of ethics for itself or for nominees. And an aide to a person being considered for a top Cabinet position said the person had not yet been asked to complete a detailed questionnaire to suss out red flags.... *By comparison, President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team was deep into the vetting process by early November 2008 — not just meeting with prospective nominees but also compiling fat dossiers on them, according to emails made public through WikiLeaks.” [Politico]

*MAKE AMERICA GRAFT AGAIN *- What’s the over/under on Trump’s first White House Christmas party being held down Pennsylvania Ave at his Old Post Office Building hotel? Betsy Woodruff: “A campaign watchdog group filed a complaint with federal election officials that alleges Stephen Bannon—recently named one of Donald Trump’s top White House advisers—*may have gotten paid illegally during Trump’s campaign by pro-Trump billionaires*. And now, a new set of Federal Election Commission filings that haven’t yet been reported on may give the group’s case some additional heft. At issue are payments of nearly $200,000 that a super PAC called Make America Number 1 made to a company tied to Bannon. On Aug. 17, Bannon left his post as chairman of Breitbart News and became the Trump campaign’s CEO. Available FEC filings show the campaign didn’t pay Bannon a salary. Larry Noble, General Counsel for the Campaign Legal Center, said he believes the super PAC covertly paid Bannon for his campaign work through his moviemaking company. Neither the super PAC nor Bannon provided a response to Noble’s comment.” [Daily Beast]

*GIULIANI, MAN *- Unlike homeless people, hizzoner can’t just put his foreign entanglements in a van and whisk them across city lines to Yonkers. Sam Stein, Jason Cherkis and Paul Blumenthal: “[T]he The Wall Street Journal reported in 2007 that one of *[Giuliani Partners’] clients was the government of Qatar, to which Giuliani provided ‘security advice.’ *Through Giuliani Partners, the former mayor also reportedly tried to enrich the Qatari government through real estate deals.... Giuliani advised the [TransCanada Corp] in 2007 on its plan to store liquefied natural gas on the Long Island Sound. It’s unclear if the company is still a client, since there is no disclosure. But should Giuliani end up at the State Department, he would find himself playing a critical role in one of TransCanada’s largest unfinished projects.The company has expressed interest in resuscitating the controversial Keystone XL pipeline after President Barack Obama rejected it last November.” [HuffPost]

*HATE READING IS GREAT FOR BUSINESS * - More people are subscribing to news services in the wake of the election, which is great, but we suspect more people will be reading PEOPLE’s hard-hitting Trump coverage, too. Daniel Marans and Michael Calderone: “*[The Times] has picked up new subscribers to both its print and digital editions at four times the normal rate*, according to spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades-Ha. The Times is one of several publications to tout increased paid readership or donations in the aftermath of Trump’s victory. The uptick in subscriptions is a bright spot amid a flurry of unflattering post-mortems on the media’s role in propelling Trump to become the Republican nominee and general uncertainty about the industry’s influence going forward. The Wall Street Journal, another legacy newspaper known for its dogged reporting ― and a conservative editorial page that nonetheless excoriated Trump throughout the campaign ― reported a similar surge in readers and subscribers.” [HuffPost]

*HATE IS ALSO GOOD FOR BUSINESS * - We can’t wait for BreitbartPRO’s industry coverage with an eye toward the globalist takeover of the banking system. Look out, American Banker!  David Bauder: “Following the installation of Breitbart’s chief executive to a top job in President-elect Donald Trump’s administration, the news organization in its infancy when Barack Obama took office has big expansion plans and the goal of being the best source of news on the new administration. That scares its critics, which consider Breitbart News the home of cheerleaders rather than journalists — and often offensive ones at that.... *Breitbart is planning a move into more spacious Washington offices, looking to add reporters in Germany, France, the Middle East and Asia, wants to add coverage of the media and technology* to its conservative-framed news and hopes to produce more video, said Alexander Marlow, the site’s editor in chief, on Monday. Its own cable network is a dream, but unlikely now, he said.” [AP]

*Hmmmmmm*: “Breitbart News is preparing a lawsuit against a ‘major media company’ over claims that it is a white nationalist website, it said in an exclusive statement to The Hill.” [The Hill]

*BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR *- Here’s a stupid dog video.

*THE ‘OFFICIAL SHOES OF WHITE PEOPLE*’ - Sperry must be incredulous. Katie Mettler: “Last week, not even a full 24 hours after President-elect Donald Trump earned that title, a senior official for the shoe company New Balance invoked his name in an interview. ‘The Obama administration turned a deaf ear to us and frankly, with President-elect Trump, we feel things are going to move in the right direction,’ Matthew LeBretton, New Balance’s vice president of public affairs, told the Wall Street Journal.... All this, however, did not stop one more dividing force from smearing the New Balance brand. *In a post written over the weekend, neo-Nazi blogger Andrew Anglin declared New Balance the ‘Official Shoes of White People.’* ‘I’m a Nike guy. Or rather, I was,’ Anglin wrote on his popular website the Daily Stormer, which promotes an anti-Semitic, white supremacist agenda. ‘It’s time to get on-board with New Balance now. Their brave act has just made them the official brand of the Trump Revolution.’” [WaPo]

*COMFORT FOOD*

- Why some countries have non-contiguous borders ― the Michigans of the world, if you will.

- Ken Bone has a YouTube channel now.

- What Jon Stewart is up to these days.

*TWITTERAMA*

@kasie: Rep. Joe Wilson, R-Southern Gentleman, tells me he’s not wearing his MAGA hat out of conference meeting because he only wears hats outside

@jabush: “the holiday pr pitches come earlier every year, huh,” she said to no one in particular

@SimonMaloy: after a long period of reflection and soul-searching I have determined that Hillary Clinton lost because of the issues I consider important

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com) or Arthur Delaney (arthur@huffingtonpost.com).

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 15 hours ago.

Judge allows Anthem to continue sales of stripped-down insurance policies

$
0
0
A judge ruled Tuesday against a restraining order that would have stopped Anthem Blue Cross from switching 500,000 Californians to health insurance plans offering no coverage for out-of-network care.

A consumer group had asked the judge for the restraining order after Anthem sent notices saying... Reported by L.A. Times 15 hours ago.

Obamacare Startup Oscar Has $45 Million Loss in Three States

$
0
0
Oscar Insurance Corp., the Silicon Valley-backed health-care startup, continued to lose tens of millions of dollars in the third quarter as the company undertakes a strategy shift.The New York-based company sells health insurance to individuals in new markets set up by the... Reported by Newsmax 9 hours ago.

101 Reasons Why Trump Won the 2016 Presidential Election

$
0
0
While the crying continues and hand-wringing grows, many are left numb: Why? How?

Here is, one hopes, the last of the why-it-happened stories you have to read. Let's make it as comprehensive; so with apologizes to Jay Z and his "99 Problems"...America has more. Choose your favorite reason at your own peril--they are all here.

*101 Reasons Why Donald Trump Won the 2016 Presidential Elections:*

Didn't release tax returns: "If I decide to run for office, I'll produce my tax returns, absolutely."
"It's gonna be terrific."
"It will be amazing!"
"I alone can fix it."
"We're losing our country folks."
"Biggest tax cut since Reagan."
Shy Trump voters
Secretary Clinton's private e-mail server
Mark Burnett not releasing Apprentice footage
"I love the poorly educated."
Shadow cast by FBI Director Comey's October Surprise letter
Crooked Lyin' Hillary Clinton "is guilty of so many crimes."
Obamacare
American Exceptionalism myth
Liberal government overreach
Secret sexist Bradley Effect voters
Wide scale opiate addiction
Anti-establishment populism
Benghazi
Change: #1 voter motivation
81% of the hypocrite Christian evangelicals who voted
"I know more about ISIS than the generals do, believe me."
"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters."
Growing income inequality
Single issue pro-life voters
66% of voters said "the country on the wrong track"
Mainstream media's false equivalence
"We're gonna drain the swamp."
"We will build the wall and Mexico will pay for the wall. Believe me."
Health insurance premium increases stories
The Conventional Wisdom was wrong
America's Lottery mentality
Exurban vote
WikiLeaks
Enthusiasm Gap
Fear
Racism
Xenophobia
Myopia
Paranoia
Self-indulgence
Post-Obama black vote dip
Campaign devoid of policy issues
Twitter Trolls
ISIS
Syrian War refugees
Consequences of corporate globalization trade agreements
Voting Rights Act RIP
The "basket of deplorables" statement
Vladimir Putin
Fake News on social media
Hollywood
No Latino vote surge
"You're going to have a deportation force" to deport 11 million illegals.
"It's a rigged system."
Islamophobia
Ted Cruz
Gary Johnson
Anthony Weiner
Jill Stein
Black Lives Matter protests
Some of Bernie Sanders naïve supporters
EPA
Entitlements
East Coast Intellectuals
Gerrymandered electoral map
The Tea Party
Roe v. Wade
Citizens United decision
Clinton Fatigue
Ferguson riots
Paul Manafort's Moscow connections
David Duke and the KKK
Fox TV News
"There's going to be extreme vetting."
"Fourteen percent of noncitizens are registered to vote."
Conspiracy Theorists
Millennial's Mehism
Living in a post-fact world
Political Correctness run amok
Anti-Semitism
Iraq and Afghanistan Wars
Radical Islamic terrorism
Second Amendment voters
9/11: The Barbarians are at the Gates
Inside the Beltway Politics
The GOP Party of No do-nothing Congress
President Barack Obama
Transgender bathrooms
Reality TV
Anti-women women voters
2008 Wall Street/Bank Bailout
The NRA
AM Talk Radio Shows
Stephen Bannon's Alt-right propaganda
Negative campaigns work
Benjamin Netanyahu
Koch Brothers
Old white folks rule when 45% of eligible voters don't vote!
Forgotten Americans found
"Make America Great Again" hats.
In American democracy the loser wins!

Learn and move on America...

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 12 hours ago.

Break Up Democratic Party: It’s Time For Clintons And Rubin To Go, And Soros Too – Analysis

$
0
0
In the week leading up to last Tuesday’s election the press was busy writing obituaries for the Republican Party. This continued even after Donald Trump’s “surprising” victory – which, like the 2008 bank-fraud crash, “nobody could have expected.” The pretense is that Trump saw what no other politician saw: that the economy has not recovered since 2008.

Democrats still seem amazed that voters are more concerned about economic conditions and resentment against Wall Street (no bankers jailed, few junk mortgages written down). It is a sign of their wrong path that party strategists are holding onto the same identity politics they have used since the 1960s to divide Americans into hyphenated special-interest groups.

Obviously, the bottom 95 Percent realize that their incomes and net worth have declined, not recovered. National Income and Federal Reserve statistics show that all growth has accrued to just 5 percent of the population. Hillary is said to have spent $1 billion on polling, TV advertising and high-salaried staff members, but managed not to foresee the political reaction to this polarization. She and her coterie ignored economic policy as soon as Bernie was shoved out of the way and his followers all but told to join a third party. Her campaign speech tried to convince voters that they were better off than they were eight years ago. They knew better!

So the question now is whether Donald Trump will really a maverick and shake up the Republican Party. There seems to be a fight going on for Donald’s soul – or at least the personnel he appoints to his cabinet. Thursday and Friday saw corporate lobbyists in the Republican leadership love-bombing him like the Moonies or Hari Krishna cults welcoming a new potential recruit. Will he simply surrender now and pass on the real work of government to the Republican apparatchiks?

The stock market thinks so! On Wednesday it soared almost by 300 points, and repeated this gain on Thursday, setting a DJIA record! Pharmaceuticals are way up, as higher drug prices loom for Medicaid and Medicare. Stocks of the pipelines and major environmental polluters are soaring, from oil and gas to coal, mining and forestry, expecting U.S. environmental leadership to be as dead under Trump as it was under Obama and his push for the TPP and TTIP (with its fines for any government daring to impose standards that cost these companies money). On the bright side, these “trade” agreements to enable corporations to block public laws protecting the environment, consumers and society at large are now presumably dead.

For now, personalities are policy. A problem with this is that anyone who runs for president is in it partly for applause. That was Carter’s weak point, leading him to cave into Democratic apparatchiks in 1974. It looks like Trump may be a similar susceptibility. He wants to be loved, and the Republican lobbyists are offering plenty of applause if only he will turn to them and break his campaign promises in the way that Obama did in 2008. It would undo his hope to be a great president and champion of the working class that was his image leading up to November 8.

*The fight for the Democratic Party’s future (dare I say “soul”?)*

In her Wednesday morning post mortem speech, Hillary made a bizarre request for young people (especially young women) to become politically active as Democrats after her own model. What made this so strange is that the Democratic National Committee has done everything it can to discourage millennials from running. There are few young candidates – except for corporate and Wall Street Republicans running as Blue Dog Democrats. The left has not been welcome in the party for a decade – unless it confines itself only to rhetoric and demagogy, not actual content. For Hillary’s DNC coterie the problem with millennials is that they are not shills for Wall Street. The treatment of Bernie Sanders is exemplary. The DNC threw down the gauntlet.

Instead of a love fest within the Democratic Party’s ranks, the blame game is burning. The Democrats raised a reported $182 million dollars running up to the election. But when from Russ Feingold in Wisconsin and other candidates in Michigan, Minnesota and Pennsylvania asked for help. Hillary monopolized it all for TV ads, leaving these candidates in the lurch. The election seemed to be all about her, about personality and identity politics, not about the economic issues paramount in most voters’ minds.

Six months ago the polls showed her $1 billion spent on data polling, TV ads and immense staff of sycophants to have been a vast exercise in GIGO. From May to June the Democratic National Committee (DNC) saw polls showing Bernie Sanders beating Trump, but Hillary losing. Did the Democratic leadership really prefer to lose with Hillary than win behind him and his social democratic reformers.

Hillary doesn’t learn. Over the weekend she claimed that her analysis showed that FBI director Comey’s reports “rais[ing] doubts that were groundless, baseless,” stopped her momentum. This was on a par with the New York Times analysis that had showed her with an 84 percent probability of winning last Tuesday. She still hasn’t admitted that here analysis was inaccurate.

What is the Democratic Party’s former constituency of labor and progressive reformers to do? Are they to stand by and let the party be captured in Hillary’s wake by Robert Rubin’s Goldman Sachs-Citigroup gang that backed her and Obama?

If the party is to be recaptured, now is the moment to move. The 2016 election sounded the death knell for the identity politics. Its aim was to persuade voters not to think of their identity in economic terms, but to think of themselves as women or as racial and ethnic groups first and foremost, not as having common economic interests. This strategy to distract voters from economic policies has obviously failed.

It did not work with women. In Florida, only 51 percent of white women are estimated to have voted for Hillary. It didn’t even work very well in ethnic Hispanic precincts. They too were more concerned about their own job opportunities.

The ethnic card did work with many black voters (although not so strongly; fewer blacks voted for Hillary than had showed up for Obama). Under the Obama administration for the past eight years, blacks have done worse in terms of income and net worth than any other grouping, according to the Federal Reserve Board’s statistics. But black voters were distracted from their economic interests by the Democrats’ ethnic-identity politics.

This election showed that voters have a sense of when they’re being lied to. After eight years of Obama’s demagogy, pretending to support the people but delivering his constituency to his financial backers on Wall Street. “Identity politics” has given way to the stronger force of economic distress. Mobilizing identity politics behind a Wall Street program will no longer work.

If we are indeed experiencing a revival of economic class consciousness, who should lead the fight to clean up the Democratic Party Wall Street leadership? Will it be the Wall Street wing, or can Bernie and perhaps Elizabeth Warren make their move?

There is only one way to rescue the Democrats from the Clintons and Rubin’s gang. That is to save the Democratic Party from being tarred irreversibly as the party of Wall Street and neocon brinkmanship. It is necessary to tell the Clintons and the Rubin gang from Wall Street to leave now. And take Evan Bayh with them.

*The danger of not taking this opportunity to clean out the party now*

The Democratic Party can save itself only by focusing on economic issues – in a way that reverses its neoliberal stance under Obama, and indeed going back to Bill Clinton’s pro-Wall Street administration. The Democrats need to do what Britain’s Labour Party did by cleaning out Tony Blair’s Thatcherites. As Paul Craig Roberts wrote over the weekend: “Change cannot occur if the displaced ruling class is left intact after a revolution against them. We have proof of this throughout South America. Every revolution by the indigenous people has left unmolested the Spanish ruling class, and every revolution has been overthrown by collusion between the ruling class and Washington.”[1] Otherwise the Democrats will be left as an empty shell.

Now is the time for Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and the few other progressives who have not been kept out of office by the DNC to make their move and appointing their own nominees to the DNC. If they fail, the Democratic Party is dead.

An indication of how hard the present Democratic Party leadership will fight against this change of allegiance is reflected in their long fight against Bernie Sanders and other progressives going back to Dennis Kucinich. The past five days of MoveOn demonstrations sponsored by Hillary’s backer George Soros may be an attempt to preempt the expected push by Bernie’s supporters, by backing Howard Dean for head of the DNC while organizing groups to be called on for what may be an American “Maidan Spring.”

Perhaps some leading Democrats preferred to lose with their Wall Street candidate Hillary than win with a reformer who would have edged them out of their right-wing positions. But the main problem was hubris. Hillary’s coterie thought they could make their own reality. They believed that hundreds of millions of dollars of TV and other advertising could sway voters. But eight years of Obama’s rescue of Wall Street instead of the economy was enough for most voters to see how deceptive his promises had been. And they distrusted Hillary’s pretended embrace of Bernie’s opposition to TPP.

The Rust Belt swing states that shifted away from backing Obama for the last two terms are not racist states. They voted for Obama twice, after all. But seeing his support Wall Street, they had lost faith in her credibility – and were won by Bernie in his primaries against Hillary.

Donald Trump is thus Obama’s legacy. Last week’s vote was a backlash. Hillary thought that getting Barack and Michelle Obama to campaign as her surrogates would help, but it turned out to be the kiss of death. Obama egged her on by urging voters to “save his legacy” by supporting her as his Third Term. But voters did not want his legacy of giveaways to the banks, the pharmaceutical and health-insurance monopolies.

Most of all, it was Hillary’s asking voters to ignore her economic loyalty to Wall Street simply to elect a woman, and her McCarthy-like accusations that Trump was “Putin’s candidate” (duly echoed by Paul Krugman). On Wednesday, Obama’s former Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul tweeted that “Putin intervened in our elections and succeeded.” It was as if the Republicans and even the FBI were a kind of fifth column for the KGB. Her receptiveness to cutting back Social Security and steering wage withholding into the stock market did not help – especially her hedge fund campaign contributors. Compulsory health-insurance fees continue to rise for healthy young people rise as the main profit center that Obamacare has offered the health-insurance monopoly.

The anti-Trump rallies mobilized by George Soros and MoveOn look like a preemptive attempt to capture the potential socialist left for the old Clinton divide-and-conquer strategy. The group was defeated five years ago when it tried to capture Occupy Wall Street to make it part of the Democratic Party. It’s attempt to make a comeback right now should be heard as an urgent call to Bernie’s supporters and other “real” Democrats that they need to create an alternative pretty quickly so as not to let “socialism” be captured by the Soros and his apparatchiks carried over from the Clinton campaign.

*Notes:*
[1] Paul Craig Roberts, “The Anti-Trump Protesters Are Tools of the Oligarchy,” November 11, 2016. Reported by Eurasia Review 9 hours ago.

National › Price of cancer drug Opdivo to be halved in February amid user surge

$
0
0
An advisory panel to the health minister approved Wednesday a government plan to halve the price of the highly expensive cancer medication Opdivo from February, as a surge in users and attendant medical costs has raised fears of burdening the public health insurance system. While the government typically reviews drug… Reported by Japan Today 8 hours ago.

Twitter Gets Emotional With #ThankYouObama Salute To Outgoing President

$
0
0
President Barack Obama still has more than two months left in office, but the tributes are already pouring in.

The program, “Love & Happiness: An Obama Celebration” on BET Tuesday night, prompted thousands of people to tweet their gratitude and caused #ThankYouObama to trend.

Here’s a sample:


Thank you God for allowing me to witness a President & First Lady that look like me. It reassures that anything is possible! #ThankYouObama

— Queen SugarMomma (@mslovejones) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for proving the haters wrong, every step of the way. You serve as an example to us all, and will be greatly missed.

— Dreamweasel (@Dreamweasel) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for showing us what real love is. pic.twitter.com/BksEWygGUR

— 1030. (@itsjoinotjoy) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for relating to us and showing us young ones we can achieve greatness while still having a little fun.

— m (@richcalzona) November 16, 2016



I love him so much, like i literally want them to stay in the white house forever #ThankYouObama

— Bri // TYSM #dymmaa (@bbbookworm02) November 16, 2016



Help America say goodbye to one cool Muhf****ka in Chief! Watch Love & Happiness An Obama Celebration 11/15 on BET/CENTRIC 9pm/8pm CT. pic.twitter.com/ji9PvoZpiM

— Samuel L. Jackson (@SamuelLJackson) November 15, 2016



#ThankYouObama for bringing charisma and a kind heart back to the white house. Your words and outlook of hope will live on forever.

— RyansAverageLife (@RyanAbe) November 16, 2016



We literally just had the coolest president EVER in office for 8 years! We will miss your President Obama #ThankYouObama

— Prasanna Joshi (@prasannaj8) November 16, 2016



A quick trip to the Church #ThankYouObama pic.twitter.com/gt06bmnLqY

— Wolé II (@Kingwole) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for being an amazing role model. I'm so proud to say you were the first president I got to vote for.

— ✨Ashley✨ (@ShadesOfTayGrey) November 16, 2016



#thankyouObama classiest first family ever. You will be sorely missed. pic.twitter.com/i73ugdHOjE

— Liane (@lianenossek) November 16, 2016



Aye @BET, your timing could not have been more perfect. We NEEDED this. Not now, but RIGHT now. Thank you, @IamDebraLee. #ThankYouObama

— April (@ReignOfApril) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for lending your time, your talent, your intellect to an often thankless job, turning our country away from the brink. #Love pic.twitter.com/QA3rwEut64

— Dr Kelly Sennholz (@MtnMD) November 16, 2016



I'm a Libertarian that never voted for you & opposed Obamacare but #ThankYouObama for being an honest stand up guy & a pretty cool president

— Will Pruitt (@WillOPruitt) November 16, 2016



Twerking is off limits in the White House! #ThankYouObama pic.twitter.com/cuAoqqIrnL

— BET (@BET) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for Showing Class, Style, and Being a President for The People.

— King Steve (@SLMG00) November 16, 2016



You gave us hope
You gave us jobs
You helped us buy our homes
You gave us health insurance
You gave us peace of mind#ThankYouObama pic.twitter.com/0QN3bXUdcI

— Miss Nasty McEwin (@maramcewin) November 16, 2016



You have shown us real possibilities, you've given us opportunities #ThankYouObama you are my forever @POTUS thank you @FLOTUS

— Raheen_Frith (@Ramar_Frith) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama for helping to secure the rights of millions of Americans. pic.twitter.com/7PPLTXGH43

— Parker ️‍ (@Parker9_) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama For the last 8 years when they went low, you went high. You will be missed tremendously.

— bennydiego (@bennydiego) November 16, 2016



#ThankYouObama even though I may not have agreed with more than half of your decisions, I still respect your dedication to this country.

— Parker Stewart (@parkerstewart99) November 16, 2016



never forget this moment. #ThankYouObama pic.twitter.com/S4xDYPwikH

— HellaNames (@HellaNames) November 16, 2016

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 6 hours ago.

Trump’s path on health care law intersects with a lawsuit

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump says he wants to preserve health insurance coverage even as he pursues repeal of the Obama-era overhaul that provided it to millions of uninsured people. How his administration handles a pending lawsuit over billions of dollars in insurance subsidies will reveal whether Trump wants an orderly transition to a […] Reported by Seattle Times 5 hours ago.

Trump’s Path on Health Care Law Intersects With a Lawsuit

$
0
0
Trump’s Path on Health Care Law Intersects With a Lawsuit WASHINGTON—President-elect Donald Trump says he wants to preserve health insurance coverage even as he pursues repeal of the Obama-era overhaul that provided it to millions of uninsured people.

How his administration handles a pending lawsuit over billions of dollars in

… Reported by Epoch Times 3 hours ago.

BAYADA Home Health Care and PreparedHealth Announce Strategic Partnership

$
0
0
Multi-year partnership will expand enTouch™, a social network for healthcare, and DINA™, a Digital Nursing Assistant across the BAYADA network.

Chicago, Illinois and Moorestown, New Jersey (PRWEB) November 16, 2016

BAYADA Home Health Care, the nation’s largest private provider of home-based services, and PreparedHealth, a growing healthcare engagement company, announced today a multi-year strategic partnership. The alliance comes on the heels of several successful projects in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Florida that proved to proactively keep patients out of the hospital and lowered overall readmissions for health system partners and health insurance companies. The two companies are currently expanding the offering of enTouch, a social network for healthcare, and DINA, a Digital Nursing Assistant, across BAYADA’s impressive network of home health, personal (assistive) care, hospice, physician house calls and home-based pharmacy specialties.

“Partnering with PreparedHealth has allowed us to proactively care for seniors in the Philadelphia market” said David Baiada, Chief Operating Officer of BAYADA Home Health Care. “With DINA, we are able to identify clients who require timely interventions and empower them to live independently in their homes and communities.”

Healthcare providers, health plans and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are increasingly looking to the home- and community-based providers, as well as family caregivers, to proactively care for patient populations. With enTouch, a secure social network now exists to conveniently and seamlessly bring together providers and family caregivers. Once on the network, participants can easily identify which of their patients require intervention, coordinate referrals, manage transitions, place orders, and even involve family caregivers as needed.

“We are proud to partner with BAYADA and have them join our growing network of home-based providers. They have an impressive, people-first culture and this innovative partnership is yet another example of BAYADA’s commitment to excellence.” said Ashish V. Shah, co-founder of PreparedHealth.

---------

About BAYADA Home Health Care
Founded in 1975 by J. Mark Baiada, BAYADA Home Health Care provides nursing, rehabilitative, therapeutic, hospice, primary care, and assistive care services to children, adults, and seniors in the comfort of their homes. Headquartered in Moorestown, NJ, BAYADA employs more than 23,000 nurses, home health aides, therapists, medical social workers, and other home health care professionals who serve their communities in 23 states from more than 310 offices. For more information, visit http://www.bayada.com.

About PreparedHealth
PreparedHealth is a Chicago-based healthcare technology company empowering people to live independently in the comfort of their homes and communities. The company has built enTouchTM, an innovative social network for healthcare, connecting patients and personal caregivers to providers and health plans (payers) to achieve their healthcare goals and objectives. In a short period of time, PreparedHealth has attracted growing interest from Post Acute Care (PAC) Providers, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) conveners, Medicare Advantage Plans, State Medicaid Programs, and Hospital Systems to better deliver on the promise of population health. For more information, visit http://www.preparedhealth.com. Reported by PRWeb 3 hours ago.

Trump's path on health care law intersects with a lawsuit

$
0
0
*By The Canadian Press*

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald Trump says he wants to preserve health insurance coverage even as he pursues repeal of the Obama-era overhaul that provided it to millions of uninsured people.

How his administration handles a pending lawsuit over billions of dollars in insurance subsidies will reveal whether Trump wants an orderly transition to a Republican-designed system or if he'd push "Obamacare" over a cliff. Stripping away the subsidies at issue in the case would put the... // Read Full Article Reported by CJME 16 minutes ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images