Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

American Kidney Fund Asks CMS to Protect ESRD Patients’ Rights to Insurance Choice and Charitable Assistance

$
0
0
Comment on HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2018 Warns Against Rules Favorable to Insurers at the Expense of Vulnerable Patients

Rockville, Maryland (PRWEB) October 10, 2016

The American Kidney Fund (AKF) is calling on the Obama Administration to ensure that kidney patients and people with other chronic conditions continue to have the same freedom of choice in insurance coverage as all Americans, even if they need charitable assistance to afford it.

In its comment letter filed with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on the 2018 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (NBPP), AKF asked CMS to promulgate a final rule that strengthens the ability of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to choose a Qualified Health Plan (QHP) as their primary insurer—not only in theory, but also in practice, by guarding patients against unfair insurer billing practices and by protecting patients’ right to use charitable assistance to afford premiums.

“The reasons ESRD patients might want to choose a Qualified Health Plan in the Marketplace are numerous,” AKF said. The nonprofit noted that even though most ESRD patients can become eligible for Medicare regardless of age, the federal government has recognized their unique circumstances through long-established law and regulations giving them a choice between Medicare and private coverage. CMS and the IRS have affirmed that ESRD patients may enroll in the Marketplace.

The majority of ESRD patients choose Medicare, but as ESRD patients have recently explained to CMS, some may instead opt for a Marketplace plan for any one of a number of compelling reasons. Medicare supplemental coverage (Medigap) is not available to ESRD patients under 65 in about half of the states, exposing these individuals to a 20 percent out-of-pocket cost burden that has no limit. Medicare provides individual coverage, but younger ESRD patients often need a plan offering family coverage. Marketplace plans may offer lower out-of-pocket costs for medications, a particularly important consideration in a patient population that has numerous co-morbidities, including diabetes and hypertension.

CMS observed in its proposed rule that some insurance companies have a provision in their individual health insurance policies indicating that the insurance plan will pay secondary to Medicare not only for individuals who are currently covered by Medicare, but also for those who could obtain Medicare coverage but are not currently covered. CMS asked for comment on this practice.

“We are deeply concerned about the effect of such provisions on the ESRD patient population,” AKF responded to CMS. “In developing such provisions, insurers are burdening ESRD patients with high out-of-pocket costs that will effectively force them onto Medicare or will leave them with devastating medical bills. Such provisions are a de facto way of allowing insurers to relieve themselves of covering high-cost ESRD patients.”

-Halt insurer restrictions on charitable assistance-

AKF commended the Administration’s recent efforts to ensure the Marketplace remains an attractive market for insurers and an affordable option for consumers. But AKF also issued an important caution.

“In efforts to make the Marketplace more attractive for insurers, CMS must not take an action that would make it difficult or impossible for an entire class of disabled individuals (low-income ESRD patients) to have this type of insurance. Their departure from the Marketplace will not fix what ails the ACA; the number of ESRD patients involved is miniscule compared to overall Marketplace enrollment. But the inability of patients with ESRD to access this insurance will, indeed, cause individual patients great harm. CMS must promulgate regulations that protect these individuals’ ability to rely on charitable aid.”

Noting that many low-income ESRD patients do not have the practical ability to afford a QHP without charitable assistance, and that nonprofits have historically served as the safety net for chronically ill patients who cannot afford their health care, AKF asked CMS to clarify the role of nonprofits in providing charitable premium assistance.

“When insurers attempted to refuse charitable premium assistance on behalf of persons with HIV/AIDS in 2014, the Administration stepped in and issued an interim final rule mandating insurers to take premium payments from the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program. Today, we are asking that the Administration protect Americans with other chronic diseases in the same manner,” AKF wrote.

AKF cited concerted efforts by insurers to steer low-income ESRD patients off their private insurance plans by refusing premium payments on behalf of policyholders from AKF. AKF’s Health Insurance Premium Program (HIPP) has operated for close to 20 years under HHS Office of Inspector General Advisory Opinion 97-1, and provides assistance for all types of insurance coverage, including Medicare Part B, Medigap, COBRA and employer group plans, and Marketplace plans.

The majority of AKF’s grant beneficiaries get help from AKF for their Medicare Part B and Medigap premiums, but AKF is working to ensure that low-income patients continue to have the ability to come to AKF for help with any insurance coverage that best meets their needs.

HIPP helps about 80,000 ESRD patients annually, including about 6,400 who are enrolled in Marketplace plans, 0.05 percent of total Marketplace enrollment.

“Unbelievably, insurance companies are putting in place policies that restrict individuals’ freedom to receive charitable assistance and use that money to pay their health care costs,” AKF said in the comment letter.

Some of the nation’s largest carriers are going so far as to send letters to their policyholders demanding that individuals attest under penalty of perjury that they are not receiving charitable assistance to help with health insurance premiums. These insurance companies are telling patients that if they do accept such assistance, their insurance coverage will be terminated. Some AKF grant recipients have lost their coverage as a result. AKF noted that insurer filings for 2017 Marketplace plans signal the expansion of this practice.

AKF urged CMS to clarify in the 2018 NBPP that insurance carriers are required to accept third-party premium assistance from recognized 501(c)3 charities and to clarify that insurers may not require their enrolled members to attest to the source of their personal funds, and may not terminate an individual’s coverage simply because that person is receiving charitable assistance to help them afford health insurance.

“We believe it is a fundamental right of every American to receive charitable assistance and to use that assistance for important needs, including health coverage,” the AKF letter said. “Allowing insurance companies to require individuals to attest to the source of their personal income is antithetical to our nation’s fundamental principles of free speech and freedom of association. The government must not permit health insurance carriers to dictate to Americans what they may and may not do with charitable assistance that they have received from recognized 501(c)(3) charities.”

In its comments, AKF also reiterated guardrails that it has previously proposed to CMS and state regulators. These guardrails would make it possible for legitimate charities to continue helping low-income patients pay for insurance, while also protecting against fraud and abuse.

The full comment letter from AKF may be found here.

About the American Kidney Fund
As the nation’s leading nonprofit working on behalf of the 31 million Americans with kidney disease, the American Kidney Fund is dedicated to ensuring that every kidney patient has access to health care, and that every person at risk for kidney disease is empowered to prevent it. AKF provides a complete spectrum of programs and services: prevention outreach, top-rated health educational resources, and direct financial assistance enabling 1 in 5 U.S. dialysis patients to access lifesaving medical care, including dialysis and transplantation. For more information, please visit KidneyFund.org, or connect with us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Reported by PRWeb 7 hours ago.

2 Simple Charts Show Which State Pensions Are Most Likely To Enforce Benefit Cuts

$
0
0
2 Simple Charts Show Which State Pensions Are Most Likely To Enforce Benefit Cuts A new research note from Moody's found that State pension funds were underfunded by $1.3 trillion at the end of FY15 but was expected to grow to $1.8 trillion at the end of FY17 as pensions continue to struggle with low returns.  We've discussed the unintended consequences of the Central Bank's low-rate polices on pension funds multiples times (see "Pension Duration Dilemma - Why Pension Funds Are Driving The Biggest Bond Bubble In History")...with the two most likely outcomes being benefits cuts for pensioners and/or crippling tax hikes for citizens.



Total US state aggregate *adjusted net pension liabilities (ANPL) totaled $1.25 trillion, or 119% of revenue in fiscal 201*5, Moody's Investors Service says in a new report. The results, based on compliance with new GASB 68 accounting rules, set a new ANPL baseline and are poised to rise for the next two fiscal years as market returns fall below annual targets.

 

"*The median return for public pension plans in FY 2016 was 0.52% compared to an average assumed investment return of 7.5%,*" Moody's Vice President -- Senior Credit Officer Marcia Van Wagner says. "*We project that aggregate state ANPL will grow to $1.75 trillion in FY 2017 audits.*"

 

The states with the highest pension burdens -- measured as the largest three-year average ANPL as a percent of state governmental revenue -- were consistent with previous years.* Illinois topped the list with pension liabilities at 280% of total governmental revenue, followed by Connecticut (Aa3 negative) at 209%, Alaska (Aa2 negative) at 179%, Kentucky at 162%, and New Jersey at 157%*.



Given that pretty much every state pension is now underfunded, Moody's introduced a new metric which they referred to as the "Tread Water" benchmark.  The largest underfunded plans in Kentucky, Illinois and New Jersey would require an incremental 7 - 7.5% of annual state revenue for contributions in order to simply stop unfunded liabilities from growing further.



Moody's new report also introduces a new "Tread Water" benchmark, which measures whether states' annual contributions to their pensions are enough to keep the unfunded net liability from growing. For FY 2015, states were evenly divided between falling short and exceeding the benchmark.

 

The report "States -- US: Medians - Low Returns, Weak Contributions Drive Continued Growth of State Pension Liabilities," says there were several states whose pension contributions were notably below the Tread Water mark, including Kentucky (Aa2 stable), New Jersey (A2 negative), Illinois (Baa2 negative), and Texas (Aaa stable).

 

To tread water, *Kentucky would have had to contribute an additional 7.5% of revenue to its pension plans; the figure for Illinois is 6.8% of revenue and 6.9% for New Jersey.* A tread water contribution plus debt service and retiree health care costs would result in total fixed costs of 33.5% for fiscally stressed Illinois and almost 31% of revenues for Connecticut.



Meanwhile, the CATO Institute points out that wages and benefits for state employees totaled $1.4 trillion in 2015 or 53% of total state and local spending.  Moreover, the report highlights that retirement benefits for state and local workers are substantially higher than the private sector at roughly $4.80 per hour compared to $1.23 per hour for private-sector workers. 



The largest component of state and local government spending is compensation for 16 million employees.  Total wages and benefits for state and local workers was *$1.4 trillion in 2015, which accounted for 53 percent of all state and local spending.*

 

State and local workers typically receive more generous benefit packages than do private-sector workers.  *On average, retirement benefits for state and local workers cost $4.80 per hour, compared to $1.23 per hour for  private-sector workers.* Insurance benefits (mainly  health  insurance)  for state  and  local  workers cost $5.43 per hour, compared to $2.59 per hour for the private sector.  Most state and local workers receive retirement health benefits, whereas most private-sector workers do not.

 

The costs of government pension and retirement health benefits are expected to rise rapidly in coming years.  Governments have promised their  workers generous retirement benefits, but most states have not put enough money aside to pay for them.  As a consequence, state and local governments will either have to cut benefits in coming years or impose higher taxes. 



Per the following chart, many states have racked up over *$20,000 of liabilities per capita, a level from which it will be very difficult to recover absent benefit cuts, massive tax hikes and/or a federal bailout. *

 

Looking at pensions on a standalone basis, New Jersey, Illinois and Alaska remain the most at risk with underfunded liabilities equal to over $10,000 per person living in those states.  Meanwhile, only Wisconsin and South Dakota have fully funded plans.

 

But, as the CATO Institute points out, the pension crisis is likely much worse than what most auditor reports would suggest because discount rates of 7.4% are unreasonably high.  *CATO estimates that reducing the discount rate from 7.4% to 2.7% would increase state pension underfunded liabilities from $1.2 trillion to $3.4 trillion.* 



Pension shortfalls are actually larger than these figures indicate.  Those are the officially reported figures, but financial experts think that the discount rates used to report pension liabilities are too high.  Higher discount rates reduce reported liabilities and create an overly optimistic picture of pension plan health.

 

In his study, Rauh recalculated pension plan funding using a 2.7 percent discount rate, rather than the official average rate of 7.4 percent.  His    recalculated  unfunded  liability jumps from $1.2 trillion to $3.4 trillion.  Similarly, Munnell and Aubry found that their unfunded pension liabilities  jumped to $4.1 trillion if plans are estimated using a 4 percent discount rate.  Under that assumption, the funding level of state and local pension plans averages just 45 percent.



Unfortunately, the pension ponzi becomes more and more unsustainable each year with funds simply borrowing from future benefit payments, which are almost certainly impaired in many states, while paying current benefit recipients in full. * While these types of "kick the can down the road" games can be played for a long time, eventually the massive underfundings will have to be addressed...and that will not be a pretty day.* Reported by Zero Hedge 6 hours ago.

Sedgwick County medical program garners attention from NASCAR driver

$
0
0
A Sedgwick County-based medical program has captured the attention of NASCAR driver Joey Logano. His namesake foundation has donated $10,000 to Project Access, which coordinates medical care for people in Sedgwick County without health insurance. Additionally, Project Access, administered through the Central Plains Health Car Partnership, is being featured this week on the Joey Logano Foundation’s website. The donation is part of Logano’s Chasing Second Chances charity that donates money to… Reported by bizjournals 3 hours ago.

United States: October 16 Deadlines Quickly Approaching For The ACA's Nondiscrimination Requirements: Are You Ready? - Reed Smith

$
0
0
By October 16, 2016, all health programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), those administered by HHS, and Health Insurance Marketplaces (Covered Entities), must be in compliance with the final pieces of the final rule issued by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued May 18, 2016, implementing section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. Reported by Mondaq 1 day ago.

The Small Business Health Insurance Roller Coaster - What is Next?

$
0
0
I have spent my entire 24 year career helping employers shop for, buy and manage their employee benefits. In that time, the vast majority of large employers (50+ employees - for this discussion) have offered (and plan to continue to offer) their employees health insurance. In 2010, the Affordable Care Act introduced new incentives (see employer shared responsibility penalties) to make sure that continues. So far, it looks like that is happening as expected.

However, the small employer market (under 50 employees - not subject to employer mandate) has been much more volatile over the last 15 years. That volatility has intensified in recent years. - peaking at 66% in 2010 and then bottoming out at 52% just 4 years later.

Why has this happened and what does the future hold for small employers?

For small businesses, the initial decision to offer benefits is almost always driven by a key employee/employees who push the issue with the business owner. Leading up to the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act, every news organization, talk show, politician, etc. talked about healthcare and health reform in some form just about every day. So, naturally, employees who had not thought about it before, were now asking about it. Employers who hadn't offered coverage before decided to make an offer for the first time.

This led to an almost 10% jump in firms offering health benefits from 2009 to 2010. But, that increase completely vanished in 2011. And, over the following years, the trend to away from group insurance increased as the % of firms offering health benefits reached a 15+ year low in 2014.

For employers with a higher percentage of low income employees, the move away from group insurance may continue. This is because these employers cannot (and do not want to) compete financially with the subsidy available to low income employees. Here is an example of how income impacts an individual's coverage choices:

An unmarried 40 year old with 2 children under 18 years old can expect to pay about $391/month for herself or about $779/month for her and her children with no subsidy or medicaid available. She will also have the following subsidy options at different income levels:

However, I expect that employers with higher-paid and geographically diverse employees will see that trend of moving away from group coverage reverse considerably. This has already started and will accelerate very quickly. Here are the 3 main drivers of that move:
· *Taxation of Employer Contribution to Individual Plans* - In an updated Q&A about the practice of reimbursing individual health premiums, the IRS Q&A warns: "such an arrangement fails to satisfy the market reforms and may be subject to a100/day excise tax per applicable employee (which is36,500 per year, per employee) under section 4980D of the Internal Revenue Code." Though there are pockets that disagree with this interpretation and are fighting for a change, most have come to grips that it is best to avoid the practice rather than risk penalties.· *Implosion of the Individual Health Insurance Market* - Just about every carrier that has offered products on the individual exchange has lost money. Some have lost so much money, they have decided to get out of the exchanges altogether. The carriers that have remained have increased their prices significantly while drastically limiting their product offering - eliminating platinum-level plans, restricting the number of zip codes that they offer policies AND introducing more and more "narrow" network options.· *Small Group Relative Stability* - Trend price increases for small group (and group in general) have been modest in comparison to what we were seeing a few years back (pre-ACA) AND are modest compared to increases we have seen and expect to see in the individual market. In addition, there are now considerably more plan options to choose from in group vs. individual. And finally, the price of comparable group plans are less than individual plans with similar benefit levels. Individuals who are not eligible for subsidies because of their income will discover this discrepancy and push for change from their employer. It will start with the business owner who is just a phone call or email away from discovering what this means to them and their families.
If you own a small business and want to see how all of this impacts you, your family and your employees we are always here to help.

This blogger graduated from Goldman Sachs' 10,000 Small Businesses program. Goldman Sachs is a partner of the What Is Working: Small Businesses section.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 1 day ago.

Win Free Cannabis Marijuana For A Year As Part of The Get Out And Vote Campaign

$
0
0
Cannabis.net is having a contest to encourage young voters to get out and vote pro-medical marijuana by offering no cost cannabis for a year.

Dover, DE (PRWEB) October 11, 2016

With the November elections just around the corner, 9 states will be voting on medical marijuana or recreational marijuana initiatives. The largest recreational law being voted on is in California, where after over 20 years of medical use, the state is voting on full recreational marijuana as well. Other states such as Maine, Massachusetts, and Florida will be voting on medical and recreational cannabis usage as well.

As part of the effort to get out and vote, Cannabis.net, the largest online cannabis and marijuana portal, is offering someone a chance to win complimentary cannabis for a year. The contest winner will have to abide by the state law for which they reside. Contest rules also include that the all participants must be at least 21 years old. Contestants must be from a state where medical marijuana or recreational marijuana is legal. Contest rules will abide by all local and state laws regarding the purchasing and payment of marijuana.

"No cost weed for a year can really help new medical marijuana patients with the costs of medicine as most health insurance companies won't cover marijuana strains as medicine, yet," says CEO of Cannabis.net, Curt Dalton.

Contestants may enter by going to the Cannabis.net Facebook page at FB/canabis_net and liking their contest video. Then leave your comment as to why you should win the contest below the video. Contestants may also enter by going to Cannabis.net, signing up for a complimentary social account, and then leave your reason on why you should win free weed for a year in our social feed. Voting will be done by likes or votes on Facebook or own our own social network. The final top three vote getters will go to a panel of judges for final judgement.

A winner will be announced on April 20th or 4/20/17. This will allow for current states voting on the measure to approve laws and implement changes after January 1st.

Cannabis.net is an industry leader whether a consumer is looking for stories about cancer and cannabis, looking to chat with cannabis based friends about CBD oils, or just find a dispensary near their location. The site offers full mapping for dispensaries, doctors, lawyers, and all cannabusinesses. Integrated with a full social network of cannabis lovers and an international blogging platform form of writers from all over the world.

For more information on the contest or how to register, please visit Cannabis.net or click here,http://www.Cannabis.net. Reported by PRWeb 16 hours ago.

You ain't done nothing. Business group lashes Malcolm Turnbull over deficit, tax scare campaign

$
0
0
Six months ago the business-backed Committee for the Economic Development of Australia presented the Turnbull government with what it said was a clear and practical plan to return the budget to surplus. There were 5 of them in fact, including different mixes of proposals such as better taxing superannuation contributions, halving the tax discount for capital gains, ending negative gearing, boosting taxes on luxury cars, alcohol and tobacco, and taxing the private health insurance rebate. Reported by Brisbane Times 16 hours ago.

Six Things I Wish Clinton Had Said to Trump

$
0
0
Jim Bourg/Pool via AP

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton watches as Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks during the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Sunday, October 9, 2016. 

According to post-debate instant polls and based on the continuing defection of other leading Republicans, Hillary Clinton evidently did well enough in Sunday night’s debate. But had she been a little more alert and less scripted, she might have demolished Donald Trump, once and for all.

Trump came into the debate on the verge of a total meltdown, with Republican elected officials deserting his candidacy by the dozen, his own running mate distancing himself from the candidate, and the nation in a state of disgust over Trump’s bragging over his gross sexual exploits.

Yet when the debate was over, the consensus that Trump has done well enough to survive, even to halt the slide. What might Hillary have said? Here are six examples:

*Trump (from the transcript):*

COOPER: Just for the record, though, are you saying that what you said on that bus 11 years ago that you did not actually kiss women without consent or grope women without consent?

TRUMP: I have great respect for women. Nobody has more respect for women than I do.

COOPER: So, for the record, you’re saying you never did that?

TRUMP: I’ve said things that, frankly, you hear these things I said. And I was embarrassed by it. But I have tremendous respect for women.

COOPER: Have you ever done those things?

TRUMP: And women have respect for me. And I will tell you: No, I have not. And I will tell you that I’m going to make our country safe. We’re going to have borders in our country, which we don’t have now.

*CLINTON* *(should have said):* Donald, who do you think you are kidding? The record is full of disgusting sexual boasts of how you hit on women, how you degrade women. Either you were lying in your boasts, or you are lying now. Either way, the claim that you have tremendous respect for women is the biggest lie of all.

*TRUMP (from the transcript): *They always blame Russia. And the reason they blame Russia because they think they’re trying to tarnish me with Russia. I know nothing about Russia.

*CLINTON (should have said): *Donald, that might be the one true thing you’ve said tonight. You didn’t know that Russia had invaded Crimea. You believe that Putin is bombing Aleppo in Syria to get rid of ISIS, when in fact he is bombing Aleppo to prop up his puppet, Bashar al-Assad, who is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths—and is one of the leading causes of the rise of ISIS. You think Vladimir Putin is a role model. You say you and he can get along—you think alike—that’s evident from the way you would trash our democracy. But on Russia, on Syria, like on so much else, you just don’t know what you’re talking about. You spout nonsense, you make it up as you go along.

*TRUMP (from the transcript, on his plan to increase competition in health insurance by allowing competition across state lines): *You’re going to have plans that are so good, because we’re going to have so much competition in the insurance industry. Once we break out—once we break out the [state] lines and allow the competition to come.

*CLINTON (should have said): *Once again, Donald is displaying his complete ignorance of how it actually works. Competition across state lines doesn’t result in better or cheaper insurance. Do you know how insurance companies actually compete? They compete by recruiting healthy people and avoiding sick people. That’s why we need to regulate them to protect people from being denied insurance or having their rates jacked up because of pre-existing conditions. Donald lives in a parallel universe of his own imagination.

*TRUMP (from the transcript): *She complains that Donald Trump took advantage of the tax code. Well, why didn’t she change it? Why didn’t you change it when you were a senator?

*CLINTON (should have said): *Donald, possibly you know that there are 100 members of the Senate, and I was just one? For most of the years that I served in the Senate, the Republicans were in the majority. Whenever we tried to make the tax code more just, so that working families could get a break and billionaires like you would pay their fair share, the Republicans kept cutting taxes on the very rich. If I am elected, I will fight to change that.

*TRUMP (from the transcript): *Hillary Clinton wants to put all the miners out of business. There is a thing called clean coal. Coal will last for 1,000 years in this country.

*CLINTON (should have said): *We owe the coal miners a better life, and we need a program of redevelopment and good jobs for the coal country. But Donald is blowing smoke when he tells the miners and their communities that he has a magic plan to bring back coal and coal mining jobs. For one thing, so much of the mining is being done by machines, and that will only increase. There are only 83,000 coal mining jobs left in America. For another thing, coal is just no longer price competitive with other forms of energy such as natural gas. Even solar is cheaper than coal. But we owe the miners, their communities, and their families a better life. We can’t throw them away like the coal companies threw away their mountains and rivers. And when I am president, these communities will have new opportunities in new, clean industries.

*TRUMP (from the transcript): *If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception.

*CLINTON (should have said):* Donald, you may have missed this in civics class, but one of the things that makes America a democracy is that the winners of elections don’t try to put their opponents in jail. Your pal Putin does that, but Americans don’t.

OK, Clinton didn’t say any of this. And she let Trump tell a number of outright lies.

Her handlers have concluded that it’s best for her to hang back and be presidential, and let Trump come across as a crazy man. The strategy partly works. But time and again, Trump has displayed an uncanny ability to come back from the dead, by breaking all the rules.

In the last debate, the moderator will be Chris Wallace from Fox. You can bet that he will be fair and balanced in the usual Fox fashion.

Clinton, to win by a decent margin, needs to maximize all the openings that Trump gives her. She needs to relax a little, and permit herself some ad-libs. Trump may have a glass jaw, but only if Hillary lands more punches. Reported by The American Prospect 14 hours ago.

Vivor Receives NIH/NCI Grant to Develop Patient Financial Toxicity Solutions with Leading Academic Medical Center

$
0
0
The Chicago-based technology-enabled healthcare solutions company will partner with Duke Cancer Institute to develop and test a solution that addresses the financial burden of cancer care. An NIH/NCI STTR Fast-Track grant will support the project with $1.73 million in research and development funding over two-and-a-half years.

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) October 11, 2016

Vivor, LLC (Vivor), a Chicago-based technology-enabled healthcare solutions company, has been awarded a prestigious STTR Fast-Track grant by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) to develop a solution that addresses the financial burden of cancer care. The grant offers a total of $1.73 million in funding over two-and-a-half years, beginning with $250,000 already awarded for the first six months. The research and development project funded by this grant will be conducted in partnership with the Duke Cancer Institute (DCI) in Durham, North Carolina.

Vivor (pronounced as in “survivor”) aims to reduce financial toxicity experienced by patients. In the scope of this NIH/NCI grant, Vivor will specifically address cancer care, as high financial burdens disproportionately affect cancer treatment and outcomes.

Vivor builds software solutions designed to maximize the use of financial assistance programs by patients and their healthcare providers. The company combines its unique domain expertise with cutting-edge technology to transform the way patients access and connect with financial resources. Vivor has already developed a platform called PayRx, which is currently available to hospital financial navigators and revenue cycle management (RCM) vendors. Using PayRx, Vivor’s customers assist patients in identifying the right financial resources for each unique diagnosis and treatment plan.

The grant was awarded through NIH’s Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program, which provides federal funds to early-stage companies working in collaboration with research institutions.

“This STTR Fast-Track grant from NCI allows us to develop technology that reduces financial toxicity by taking advantage of existing but underused resources,” said Vivor CEO Ian Manners. “Beyond the benefit for patients, this technology will also have significant commercial potential due to its compelling value proposition for provider organizations and pharmaceutical companies.”

DCI’s participation in the grant-funded project is led by Yousuf Zafar, MD, MHS. Zafar, the project’s principal investigator, is an oncologist and associate professor of medicine and public policy who has done extensive research on the effect of financial toxicity in cancer care.

“A large proportion of cancer patients are at risk of experiencing treatment-related financial burden that worsens their quality of life and prevents them from receiving the best cancer treatment possible,” said Zafar. “This project will explore ways that could potentially reduce the burdens of cancer and improve the quality of care delivery.”

In Phase I of the project Vivor will develop a web-based tool that allows patients to quickly and accurately identify financial assistance resources that fit their unique situations. The tool will undergo preliminary testing by Zafar’s team at DCI.

In Phase II, Vivor will extend the new product into a fully-featured mobile app that empowers patients to estimate and plan their expenses during treatment, identify assistance programs, and coordinate with a financial counselor to secure financial assistance. A randomized, controlled trial at DCI will measure the product’s ability to reduce patient out-of-pocket costs, as well as the impact on patients’ knowledge of financial resources, quality of life, and subjective financial distress.

While millions of Americans have gained health insurance coverage over the past several years, many people still face unaffordable out-of-pocket costs following a cancer diagnosis. The growth of this “underinsured” population has contributed to patients’ considerable financial distress during cancer treatment. “We are honored that the NIH believes in our research and in the incredible opportunity it presents to address this growing problem,” says Manners.

-----------

Research discussed in this release is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R42CA210699. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Reported by PRWeb 13 hours ago.

The 17 Best Beach Towns for a Low-Cost Retirement in Southeast Asia—InternationalLiving.com

$
0
0
InternationalLiving.com’s new Southeast Asia report and interactive map highlight the 17 best towns, villages, and cities in the region for an expat’s beachside retirement... on as little as $1,500 a month.

Baltimore, MD (PRWEB) October 11, 2016

Known for its perfect beaches, low prices, and excellent scuba diving, Southeast Asia more often conjures images of young globe-trotting backpackers carousing at beach bars than it does aging expats lounging on the sand.

But adventuresome retirees looking for warm weather, rich culture, and excellent-value living would do well to consider their options in Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam, and the Philippines.

International Living’s new report and interactive map puts 17 of the top-value picks in the region at users’ fingertips—destinations chosen by International Living’s team of expat correspondents and editors based in the region.

Take Hua Hin, Thailand, for example. Located on the eastern coast of the country on the Gulf of Thailand, it’s a popular resort town that offers year-round temperatures in the mid-80s F, sandy beaches, turquoise waters, great restaurants, a lively arts scene, and seven golf courses—so there’s plenty to do. Yet despite its resort-town status, Hua Hin remains remarkably affordable. International Living Southeast Asia Correspondent Kirsten Raccuia reports that a single expat can live in Hua Hin on a monthly budget, not including rent, of $610, which “includes a weekly massage for $8, health insurance, and a round of golf” as well as “eating out at least twice a day.”

Another example of a good-value destination in Southeast Asia is Kota Kinabalu, the capital of the state of Sabah on the island of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu is a growing resort destination, and International Living Editorial Director Eoin Bassett says, “There are foreign retirees here and costs are low. You’ll rent from as little as $335—that’s short-term and flexible—and added to that your monthly costs range from $600 to $1,500 depending on the lifestyle you choose.”

Each of the 17 beach towns and cities featured in International Living’s new report contain similar examples—all beach destinations worth the attention of expats intrigued by the idea of an adventure in retirement that won’t break the bank.

Affordability figures prominently in the criteria used to select these great-value retirement destinations. But in addition to the cost of living, other important attributes help make a place comfortable and attractive for day-to-day living, including: ease of integration; access to quality medical care; a comfortable climate; good infrastructure; proximity to amenities, entertainment venues, natural wonders, and more.

International Living’s full report on and interactive map of Southeast Asia, featuring its best beach towns and cities for low-cost retirement, can be found at: Southeast Asia - Where Beach Living Comes at an Affordable Price.

Editor’s Note: Members of the media have permission to reproduce the article linked above once credit is given to InternationalLiving.com.

For information about InternationalLiving.com content republishing, source material or to book an interview with one of our experts, contact Associate Editor Carol Barron, 772-678-0287 (US), CBarron(at)InternationalLiving(dot)com or visit the Media Center.

For 36 years, InternationalLiving.com has been the leading authority for anyone looking for global retirement or relocation opportunities. Through its monthly magazine and related e-letters, extensive website, podcasts, online bookstore, and events held around the world, InternationalLiving.com provides information and services to help its readers live better, travel farther, have more fun, save more money, and find better business opportunities when they expand their world beyond their own shores. InternationalLiving.com has more than 200 correspondents traveling the globe, investigating the best opportunities for travel, retirement, real estate, and investment. Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Chicago Teachers Just Avert Strike That Would Impact Hundreds Of Thousands Of Students

$
0
0
Teachers in Chicago, the nation’s third-largest school district, narrowly avoided a strike Monday night. Minutes before the midnight strike deadline, the Chicago Teachers Union came to a tentative contract agreement with the city’s education board.

Chicago teachers have been working without a contract since June 2015, when the previous pact expired. Negotiations stalled for months over teacher pay, pension contributions and classroom resources, according to The Associated Press. Some of the city’s 20,000 unionized teachers voted last month to authorize a strike after more than a year of negotiations with Chicago Board of Education failed to produce a new contract. Union delegates set an Oct. 11 strike date if talks continued to falter. 

However, the school board made a last-ditch proposal late Monday that “does look significantly better” than previous offers, said union president Karen Lewis, according to the Chicago Tribune. 

The tentative agreement is not “a final contract,” says a statement from the union. “Every active member of the Chicago Teachers Union will have an opportunity to review and vote on the agreement before a contract is ratified.” That process could take several weeks, CBS reports.

The education board, which Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed, initially wanted teachers to make larger contributions to their own pension funds and health insurance in exchange for a pay raise. For months, teachers rejected the givebacks and said they wanted the city to give surplus tax money to schools. 

Under the tentative agreement, the district would continue to contribute to pension funds for veteran teachers. However, new teachers will receive pay raises in lieu of the pension help, according to CNN.

“What I will tell you is that it wasn’t easy, as you all know,” said Lewis during a press conference Monday night. “Clearly, we had some issues and there’s some things we’re going to still be working on. But what we found is that what we ended up with is something that’s good for kids, is good for clinicians, is good for paraprofessionals, for teachers, for the community and we’re very pleased that we were able to come to this tentative agreement.” 

The mayor said all sides “came together to work together with a common purpose” in the end.

“The teachers’ hard work will be respected in this contract, and appropriately rewarded,” said Emanuel, per the Chicago Tribune. “Chicago Public Schools’ finances will be stronger and on firmer ground because of this agreement.” 

Teachers were instructed to show up and protest outside of schools Tuesday morning if an agreement wasn’t reached. Activist and Chicago Public School student Asean Johnson told The Huffington Post Monday that he would support his teachers on the picket lines if they had to strike.

 “We’re not getting the funding we need. There’s too may budget cuts, too many teachers getting laid off. I know a few people who said they had to leave the city because of Chicago Public Schools and that shouldn’t happen,” the 13-year-old student said Monday. “I love my teachers ... They actually help us out if we need help, they’re the teachers you want to have in your school. They come and check on you just to see how you’re doing. If you’re having a bad day they’ll talk to you about it. That’s the type of teachers they are.”

The school district in recent years has been plagued with mismanagement and financial difficulties. In 2015, former schools CEO Barbara Byrd Bennett pleaded guilty in an elaborate bribery arrangement. In August, the district laid off more than 1,000 staff members. Had an agreement not been reached, it would have been the second major strike for CTU since 2012. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 7 hours ago.

Walkingspree and CHRISTUS Health Announce New Partnership

$
0
0
Walkingspree and CHRISTUS Health have teamed up to customize a system-wide walking challenge for CHRISTUS Associates. CHRISTUS' wellness program, designed to improve Associates' health and overall well-being, is maximizing Walkingspree's skills for integrating into a hospital's branded wellness platform.

San Antonio, Texas (PRWEB) October 11, 2016

Walkingspree, a national corporate wellness program provider specializing in custom walking programs, and CHRISTUS Health, an international Catholic, faith-based, not-for-profit health system are pleased to announce their new partnership.

“Our walking program is a great challenge and a good way for our Associates to get involved in a friendly competition, increase their physical activity and reach a common goal of better health,” said Marty Margetts, CHRISTUS Health’s Executive Vice-President, Corporate Services and Chief Human Resources Officer.

2016 has been a busy year for companies as they learn more and more about the benefits of organized walking and wellness programs like Walkingspree’s. Hospitals, in particular, face challenges implementing workplace wellness due to the busy nature of the work environment, shift work and high stress situations. This combination of workplace elements is what makes Walkingspree a perfect fit for CHRISTUS. Walkingspree works within and around the workplace culture, encouraging the employer to use their own wellness initiatives within the Walkingspree program.

“We are proud to partner with CHRISTUS,” said Hiran Perera, Walkingspree’s Chief Executive Officer. “We believe this integration is a perfect fit for CHRISTUS’ Associates and their busy lifestyles. Studies have proven over and over that consistent walking is a safe, simple way to achieve better overall health. We’re excited to see the positive health benefits in CHRISTUS’ future.”

Although lowering health care costs is a benefit of the Walkingspree program, CHRISTUS Health’s decision to challenge its Associates to be more active and improve their overall fitness is based on the system’s genuine desire to help their Associates live happier, healthier lives.

“We work hard to extend the healing ministry of Jesus Christ and improve our patients’ quality of life,” commented Marty Margetts, “So, it’s only fitting that we take the time to do the same for ourselves, too. This challenge gives our Associates the opportunity to take small steps, like taking the stairs instead of the elevator, to bring about big changes in their lives. Our hope is that this activity leads to improved physical and mental well-being for all of our Associates.”

‘HEALTHY HABITS: Change for Good’ (CHRISTUS’ wellness program) is a great example of a corporation integrating their own branded wellness platform with a specialty based corporate wellness provider, Walkingspree, to achieve optimal results,” states Nathan Pickle, Chief Revenue Officer at Walkingspree. “We’ve helped them customize a top notch system-wide walking challenge using their personally assigned Walkingspree account manager and our online e-Store for Associates to acquire new Fitbit devices.”

Walkingspree is looking forward to the future and its partnership with CHRISTUS Health and hopes to see more companies reaching out to enhance the lives of their employees.

About Walkingspree

Walkingspree specializes in customized corporate walking programs. These programs integrate individual fitness tracking into one solution. An industry leader with a proven and established track record, Walkingspree is recognized for boosting morale at the workplace, and reducing the rising cost of health insurance claims.The company offers two types of programs.The Flex Business Program (can be launched online in minutes) for companies with less than 100 participants and the Enterprise Program for companies with over 100 participants. Both programs include an online e-Store where new Fitbit or Garmin devices can be purchased and a BYOD feature that allows employees to “Bring Your Own Device” whether that be various types of activity trackers or a smartphone. Learn more about Walkingspree at http://walkingspree.com

About CHRISTUS Health

CHRISTUS Health, an international Catholic, faith-based, not-for-profit health system, is headquartered in Dallas and is comprised of almost 350 services and facilities, including more than 60 hospitals and long-term care facilities, 175 clinics and outpatient centers and dozens of other health ministries and ventures. CHRISTUS services can be found in more than 60 cities in the U.S., Mexico, Chile and Colombia. The system employs more than 40,000 Associates and more than 13,500 physicians on facility medical staffs who provide care and support for patients. CHRISTUS Health is listed among the 10 largest Catholic health systems in the U.S. Reported by PRWeb 5 hours ago.

A.M. Best Places Credit Ratings of EmblemHealth, Inc.’s Insurance Subsidiaries Under Review with Negative Implications

$
0
0
A.M. Best Places Credit Ratings of EmblemHealth, Inc.’s Insurance Subsidiaries Under Review with Negative Implications OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A.M. Best has placed under review with negative implications the Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of B (Fair) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings (Long-Term ICR) of “bb+” for Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (HIP), HIP Insurance Company of New York, Group Health Incorporated (GHI) and ConnectiCare, Inc. (ConnectiCare) (Farmington, CT). All companies are subsidiaries of EmblemHealth, Inc. and domiciled in New York, NY, unless otherwise specified. The u Reported by Business Wire 3 hours ago.

Hans Scheil, Certified Financial Planner and Author, Releases “7 Common Medicare Mistakes” Report

$
0
0
Author of “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement” announces the release of a new special report.

Cary, NC (PRWEB) October 11, 2016

With Medicare Open Enrollment season starting October 15, Hans E. Scheil, CFP®, president of Cardinal Retirement Planning, Inc. and author of “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement” announces the release of a new special report, “7 Common Medicare Mistakes & How to Avoid Them.” Readers who purchase his book this week on October 11 or October 12 will receive access to a free download of the new report, along with an invitation to a Medicare Town Hall Meeting on YouTube LIVE, where Scheil will provide critical insights and conduct a Q&A about Medicare. To receive this download and an invitation to this event, visit medicare.cardinalguide.com, and complete the purchase of the book on Amazon.com during the promotional period.

Scheil’s book, “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement,” includes the many items that are important for a successful retirement, as well as the details of Social Security and Medicare, long-term care, post-retirement investment strategies, tax reduction strategies and more. Easy-to-understand chapter summaries, charts, reports, and sample documents help the reader gain a better understanding of each retirement planning topic. Each chapter also provides an in-depth analysis of each topic through real-life examples from Scheil’s own practice.

Inspired by personal experience as a caregiver for his mother, father, and grandmother, Scheil has dedicated his 40-year career to helping people better prepare for their retirement future. “After caring for members of my family as they aged, I gained first-hand knowledge of what it is really like to not be prepared in your later years. It was then I vowed to help as many people as possible, and I have been guiding and warning people about the various pitfalls they could face ever since,” said Scheil.

“The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement” is available for purchase at Amazon.com. Residents of North Carolina can request a complimentary signed copy of the book in return for a donation to Alzheimer’s North Carolina in memory of Mary Scheil. For more information, please call (919) 535-8261.

****

ABOUT THE AUTHOR HANS SCHEIL
Hans E. Scheil, CFP®, is the president of North Carolina-based Cardinal Retirement Planning, Inc., and the author of “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement.” Throughout his 40 years in the financial services industry, Scheil has worked with clients age 65+ to help provide them with the financial solutions they need to live a long and successful retirement. In his book, “The Complete Cardinal Guide to Planning for and Living in Retirement,” Scheil addresses the major problems retirees can face and provides strategies for overcoming them. Scheil is a Certified Financial Planner™ (CFP®) as well as a Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU®), Chartered Financial Consultant® (ChFC®) and Chartered Advisor for Senior Living® (CASL®). He also holds Life and Health insurance licenses in 50 states and the District of Columbia and is an investment advisor representative. For more information on Scheil, please call (919) 535-8261 or visit http://www.PlanWithCardinal.com. Reported by PRWeb 2 hours ago.

Time to Stand up to the Conservative Desi Uncle: What the National Asian American Survey Tells Us About the True South Asian American Vote

$
0
0
It's exactly four weeks until the U.S. Presidential election. But, it is also possibly three years before necessary fixes are made to Obamacare to control escalating health insurance premiums. And five years until policies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions are put into place. And ten years before we see federal and state action to stop the school to prison pipeline that has ruined the lives of so many African American and Latino youth. Or we may never see these changes.

Growing up in the South Asian American community, I was never sure where my community stood politically. I knew my parents were liberal, but I didn't know if our family was in the minority. And I always heard THE LOUD UNCLE--not someone I was related to--but someone at dinner parties who would talk disparagingly about poor people, Black people, and sometimes other Asians and would speak in dismissive terms about affirmative action or welfare or other government programs. And no one would challenge him. And so I thought that he spoke for so many in my community.

But, he doesn't. Data from the National Asian American Survey, released last week by Karthick Ramakrishnan and his team, verifies what I have always believed. SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS ARE PROGRESSIVE. [I can be loud too, UncleJi.] Here's what we now know about the Desi community based on a 2,238 telephone interviews of Asian Americans and specifically of 274 Asian Indians:

• 70% support Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act
• 80% support stricter emission limits on power plans in order to address climate change
• 80% support the government doing more to give blacks equal rights with whites
• 69% support major new spending by the federal government that would help undergraduates pay tuition at public colleges without needing loans, and
• 78% oppose banning people who are Muslim from entering the United States.

And, I should probably mention 67% of Asian Indians in the survey said that they would be inclined to vote for Hillary Clinton and only 7% for Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential election.

On every question asked in the survey, Asian Indians overwhelmingly chose the liberal or progressive option whether it was in terms of government benefits, climate change or national security. And they were--in what may surprise many of us--in the top three most progressive of all Asian American communities by every measure but one (increased college financial aid, where they were in the top four).

I'm thrilled to see that so many news outlets, including the LA Times and FiveThirtyEight have featured the survey data in recent articles. But, the survey data are important not just because of what they mean for November 8. They are critical for what they mean about November 9, 2016, November 9, 2026 and November 9, 2036.

It's time to unleash the power of South Asian progressives in the United States. We no longer have to sit in silence in our temples, mosques and gurudwaras, afraid that we're in the minority of our fellow Desis. We must no longer wait for every presidential cycle to assert our voice. It's time for every one of you who are reading this to do something to advance the progressive movement. Do just one of these right now:

• Join your fellow Desis by supporting amazing progressive local organizations like South Asian Network (SAN) in Southern California, national organizations like South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT) in DC or one of the 50+ members of the National Coalition of South Asian Organizations.
• Endorse the platform of the Movement for Black Lives.
• Stand with undocumented members of the community in support of DACA and DAPA implementation and LGBTQ friends and colleagues to make marriage equality a reality across the country especially if you're a U.S. citizen or identify as heterosexual.
• Speak out against racist depictions of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in news and entertainments outlets.
• Work toward implementation of long-term progressive policies with APIA Vote, 18 Million Rising and Mobilize the Immigrant Vote.
• If you're Hindu, Sikh, Jain or Christian, stop tolerating anti-Muslim comments from other South Asians as well as from White, African American, Latino and other Asian American communities and speak up against Islamophobic policies.

• And, of course, vote on November 8 . . . not only for U.S. President, but also for your member of Congress and the U.S. Senate (if applicable), your state and local policymakers and on every single ballot measure. And be sure to check out the SAALT Voter Guide to see where the presidential candidates stand.

UncleJi, you're out there somewhere. You and I have lost touch, but I don't doubt that you're still loud, perhaps you're still angry about your kids not getting into the Ivy Leagues when other people of color did, you're forever denying the existence of domestic violence in our community, and always disparaging gay, lesbian and transgender South Asians even when your nephews and nieces identify as queer. I want you to know that the Desis at the dinner party are no longer going to be silent. We know now that you're in the minority and that you speak for very, very few of us. We are finding our voices and pretty soon, you will hear us roar.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 1 day ago.

​How to pick a health insurance plan (or make the most of the one you have)

$
0
0
You may or may not have a choice regarding your health insurance plan, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be well-informed about the choices you do have when it comes to one of the most important resources available to you and your family. Here are a points you should know as you embark on choosing (or making the most of) your health insurance plan for 2017. Making the most of your employer-sponsored health coverage If you are employed, chances are your employer offers one or more health… Reported by bizjournals 19 hours ago.

Smith & Jones Publishes 2017 Hospital Marketing Trends White Paper

$
0
0
Download the white paper today and start preparing for the evolving world of healthcare.

Troy, NY (PRWEB) October 12, 2016

Hospitals and health systems that target niche audiences and help patients make healthier choices will get ahead of the competition in 2017. Smith & Jones leveraged this insight and more to create their latest white paper, Top Ten 2017 Hospital Marketing Trends.

Available on the Smith & Jones website, the 2017 top trends white paper was developed through in-depth research and internal interviews. The white paper will help hospital marketers stay ahead of the curve by detailing popular trends such as writing content for voice command search or targeting smaller audience groups to gain quality leads.

“The 2016 trends white paper was all about convenience and relevance. Although the consumers' need for instant gratification is still at an all-time high, population health and new technology are reshaping how we market to consumers,” CEO Mark Shipley said. “This white paper addresses these challenges and helps us understand what we need to do to adapt.”

The white paper highlights marketing strategies and tactics brought on by changes in consumer behavior, high-deductible health insurance plans, and new technology. Download Top Ten 2017 Hospital Marketing Trends today and learn about the trends that will shape how you plan for the upcoming year, including:· The patient experience

· Customer relationship management

· Digital advertising 3.0

· 10x video

About Smith & Jones

Smith & Jones is the marketing communications agency exclusively focused on helping hospitals and health systems outsmart their competitors. We imagine an America where healthcare is truly personal, where everyone has local access to a superior customer and clinical experience, and as a result, people live healthier lives. We contribute to that vision by helping our clients create meaningful and desirable healthcare brands, align their internal teams, engage new and existing patients, and drive downstream revenue. Together, we change the outcomes. Reported by PRWeb 16 hours ago.

The IHC Group Acquires PetPlace.com, Premier Destination for Pet Parents

$
0
0
Expanding its footprint and commitment in the pet health market, The IHC Group (IHC) today announced it has acquired the assets of http://www.petplace.com (PetPlace), including subscribers and its social media outlets in a transaction effective October 1, 2016.

New York, NY (PRWEB) October 12, 2016

Expanding its footprint and commitment in the pet health market, The IHC Group (IHC) today announced it has acquired the assets of http://www.petplace.com (PetPlace), including subscribers and its social media outlets in a transaction effective October 1, 2016.

PetPlace attracts over 1,000,000 visitors each month as the popular web destination for pet parents concerned with their pet’s health and well-being. PetPlace’s content includes more than 10,000 veterinarian approved articles covering topics such as pet health conditions, breed information, behavior and training, medications and general wellness and care. Since its launch in 1999, thousands of pet parents have subscribed to PetPlace to receive news and information important to them via email as well as through social media channels such as Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest.

“We are extremely excited to bring PetPlace into The IHC Group. The domain helps us expand a unique brand in the pet health market that not only includes the rich content that consumers desire, but also acts as an outlet for pet health insurance options to meet their needs in caring for their beloved dog or cat,” said Rick Faucher, President for the pet health division of The IHC Group. “IHC will continue to deliver timely information with key experts and entertaining content to PetPlace audience.”

IHC entered the pet health market in 2011 underwriting pet health policies with Independence American Insurance Company (IAIC). In just 5 years, IAIC is now one of the top 6 pet insurance carriers based on gross written premiums of over $40 million.

“IHC has been looking to further its commitment to the pet insurance space and we believe PetPlace is a perfect complement to that effort as we ramp up our distribution in 2017,” said David Kettig, Chief Operating Officer of The IHC Group and President of Independence American Insurance Company.

For more information on PetPlace or pet health insurance, please contact Rick Faucher at 602-395-7083 or Rick.Faucher@IHCGroup.com.

#

About The IHC Group
Independence Holding Company (NYSE: IHC) is a holding company that is principally engaged in underwriting, administering and/or distributing group and individual disability, specialty and supplemental health, pet, and life insurance through its subsidiaries since 1980. The IHC Group owns three insurance companies (Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York, Madison National Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Independence American Insurance Company) and IHC Specialty Benefits, Inc., which is a technology-driven insurance sales and marketing company that creates value for insurance producers, carriers and consumers (both individuals and small businesses) through a suite of proprietary tools and products (including ACA plans and small group medical stop-loss). All products are placed with highly rated carriers.

“IHC” and “The IHC Group” are the brand names for plans, products and services provided by one or more of the subsidiaries and affiliate member companies of The IHC Group (“IHC Entities”). Plans, products and services are solely and only provided by one or more IHC Entities specified on the plan, product or service contract, not The IHC Group. Not all plans, products and services are available in each state.

About Independence American Insurance Company
Independence American Insurance Company is domiciled in Delaware and licensed to write property and/or casualty insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Its products include short-term medical, hospital indemnity, fixed indemnity limited benefit, group and individual dental, pet insurance, and non-subscriber occupational accident insurance in Texas. Independence American is rated A- (Excellent) for financial strength by A.M. Best Company, a widely recognized rating agency that rates insurance companies on their relative financial strength and ability to meet policyholder obligations (an A++ rating from A.M. Best is its highest rating). Reported by PRWeb 16 hours ago.

Going Local in the Fight Against Inequality

$
0
0
Mike Groll/AP Images

Bill de Blasio visits Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has alternated between thwarting de Blasio's proposals and seeking to outdo them. 

This article appears in the Fall 2016 issue of The American Prospect magazine. Subscribe here. 

It has been five years since the Occupy movement focused attention on the gap in income between the top 1 percent and other Americans. During Barack Obama’s first term, Democrats made federal taxes more progressive and expanded health insurance for low- and middle-income people. But since those changes were adopted, conservative forces in Washington have stifled further progress toward greater income equality.

Many liberals have therefore focused on local measures, despite some clear limitations to going local. Legally, cities and counties are creatures of their respective states and often face strict statutory limits on what they can do, including laws preempting local initiatives (see Abby Rapoport, “Blue Cities, Red States,” The American Prospect, Summer 2016).

Cities and counties also face competition from other localities that offer tax abatements and other incentives for business, which make it difficult to raise enough revenue to carry out progressive policies in fighting inequality.

The constraints on local governments, however, are often exaggerated. Localities can do a great deal to improve incomes and living standards in low-income communities. And contrary to the conservative insistence that progressive taxation will drive away the wealthiest taxpayers, recent research on “millionaire taxes” by Charles Varner and Cristobal Young of Stanford shows that the rich are generally so tied in to local economic and social networks that they have not moved out of the states that have imposed higher taxes on them.

Today, some cities enjoying strong economies have more leeway for progressive policies than they did in leaner times. With an economic output greater than that of 46 states, New York City has been in a singular position. It has also had a political leadership committed to reducing inequality since the election of Bill de Blasio as mayor in 2013. But considering all the obstacles to local progressive policies and the difficulties of doing anything about inequality, is de Blasio having a meaningful impact?

 

*NEW YORK CITY IS *the most economically polarized of the 25 largest U.S. cities. As the nation’s largest financial center, it is home to bankers and hedge fund and private-equity managers, who enjoy sky-high levels of compensation. From 2009 to 2013, as the economy recovered from the Great Recession, the wealthiest 1 percent took nearly half of all New York City income growth, according to an analysis of income tax data by the Fiscal Policy Institute. The top 1 percent’s share of total income rose to 40 percent in 2014, nearly twice the share of the 1 percent nationally. While New York City workers have seen some wage gains in the past two years, median family income in 2014 was still nearly 6 percent below pre-recession levels.

Poverty was also higher in 2014 than in 2008. Especially telling is the estimate by University of Washington researchers that 42 percent of all New York City households lack sufficient income to meet minimum basic family needs such as shelter, food, child care, and health care. Among black and Asian households, nearly half don’t make enough to meet that standard, and the incomes of three out of every five Latino households fall short of sufficiency.

If the dividends of economic growth had been more equally shared, the difference would have been enormous. Median family income in 2014 would have been $97,000, two-thirds higher than it actually was, if median incomes had grown since 1990 as fast as the city’s economy (as measured by the increase in per capita gross product).

Running for mayor in 2013, de Blasio highlighted New York’s “tale of two cities,” the city of the rich and the city of the struggling. Since taking office, he has acted in concert with a progressive city council led by Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito to lift low wages, expand benefits for low-wage workers, institute universal pre-kindergarten, increase affordable housing, and bolster funding for programs serving the poor. In several areas, such as taxes, state law circumscribes local autonomy, and Governor Andrew Cuomo and the Republican-controlled state senate have blocked de Blasio’s initiatives. Most notably, they prevented the city from instituting an income tax surcharge on the 1 percent to pay for universal pre-K.

Even with those constraints, New York City hasn’t had such a progressive government in a long time. In his first year in office, de Blasio mandated five paid sick days for all workers at businesses with five or more employees. He increased the living-wage level required for workers at companies receiving city subsidies and expanded coverage to the employees of business tenants in subsidized developments. He also pushed aggressively for an increase in the state minimum wage, or the authority from the state to set a higher wage floor in New York City.

At first, Governor Cuomo chided de Blasio for proposing a higher wage level for the city. But as the Fight for 15 campaign built momentum, Cuomo changed course, using his executive authority to establish a wage board that recommended a $15 floor for all fast-food workers in the state, with a faster phase-in for New York City. By early 2016, the governor proposed and aggressively pushed for the enactment of a minimum-wage increase for all workers that would reach $15 by 2019 in New York City and later in the rest of the state. Since de Blasio has been mayor, Cuomo has alternated between thwarting de Blasio’s proposals and seeking to outdo them. In one area, the mayor still occupies the high ground. Unlike Cuomo, de Blasio has included funding in his latest budget for nonprofit agencies under city contract to enable them to keep up with rising minimum wages.

While public-sector workers have met hostility from elected officials elsewhere in the country, de Blasio has resolved almost all of the city’s contracts with its own workforce. Michael Bloomberg had left office after 12 years as mayor without having settled contracts affecting all 340,000 city employees. In contrast, de Blasio reaffirmed the principle of collective bargaining for public employees and was able to fully cover the cost of labor contracts containing modest wage increases and significant health insurance savings.

To date, de Blasio’s crowning achievement as mayor has been the expansion of universal pre-K to serve all 4-year-olds, mainly from low-income families. More than 68,000 children have been enrolled, more students than in the entire public school systems in Boston or San Francisco.

In addition to substantially increasing funding of a range of human services such as homelessness prevention and immigrant, youth, and senior programs, de Blasio and his social services commissioner, Steve Banks, reversed two decades of punitive welfare policies. Banks had been a Legal Aid attorney who frequently sued the city to compel better treatment for vulnerable populations.

The city’s economy and its private-sector jobs have continued to grow faster than the nation’s under de Blasio, business confidence and investment evidently undiminished by a progressive in City Hall. Construction activity and private employment are at record levels and thriving tech, professional services, cultural, and tourism industries have helped make the current economic expansion the first in New York since the 1960s that has not been driven mainly by Wall Street. Strong revenue growth has certainly aided de Blasio in enacting much of his agenda, but he has also built up budget reserves to cushion any eventual slowdown.

De Blasio’s most ambitious policy is his plan to preserve and create 200,000 units of affordable housing. Rents have risen much faster than wages in New York since 2000. Two-thirds of city households are renters and one-third of all renters pay more than half of their income in rent, including nearly half of all low-income renters.

In its first two years, the de Blasio administration financed the preservation and construction of more than 40,000 affordable apartments and put nearly $7.5 billion in the city’s ten-year capital plan for affordable housing. Many of the new units already built or under construction have benefited from a long-standing lucrative tax break known as “421-a,” which also subsidized a lot of high-priced condo units and padded the profits of developers. The tax break expired earlier this year and it’s not clear whether or in what form it might continue.

De Blasio is relying heavily on a new regime of mandatory inclusionary housing passed by the city council. Developers building housing in areas rezoned for denser development will be required to set aside a portion of units for low- or moderate-income families. (One option would be to require 30 percent of units be affordable for families with incomes at 80 percent of area median income, or about $62,000 for a three-person family. Set-aside requirements are lower for lower-income families.) The plan relies on rezoning low-income neighborhoods such as East New York and East Harlem and has triggered concerns about displacement and gentrification.

Rezoning areas for greater density enables developers to make a lot more money; mandatory inclusion of affordable housing enables the city to require that some of that additional value go to low-income families. Housing advocates argue that the city can increase affordability requirements even further. Some would like to see the city buy up land in advance of rezoning so that it can directly capture more of the city-induced wealth creation, or use a community land trust to permanently insulate housing from market pressures. De Blasio’s efforts to limit displacement of existing tenants and encourage greater community participation in planning may help ensure that the program genuinely advances its equity goals.

De Blasio has also provided funds for long overdue repairs at the city’s public housing projects, and his appointments to the Rent Guidelines Board permitted rent increases of just 1 percent in three years for more than 1.1 million rent-stabilized housing units—the smallest three-year increase in the city’s history of rent stabilization.

 

*DE BLASIO'S POLICIES* stand out when compared with those of his immediate predecessors and Governor Cuomo. While they helped make New York one of the safest large cities in the country and contributed to the city’s economic growth, Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg were not concerned about social and economic inequalities. Giuliani initiated and Bloomberg continued punitive welfare policies that denied or revoked benefits for many poor families and prevented recipients from pursuing a college education. De Blasio has ended those practices, overhauled employment policies to foster skill development, and used temporary assistance to keep people in their homes and prevent evictions and greater homelessness.

While unrelenting in his drive to shrink welfare rolls, Giuliani’s generosity in handing out sizable tax breaks to Wall Street firms and other large corporations cost the city an average of $125 million each year he was in office. He also agreed to give the New York Stock Exchange nearly $1 billion to build a new trading floor, though the deal fell through after the September 11 attacks. (The stock exchange never tried to revive the deal, since computerization soon dramatically shrank the need for trading space.) Bloomberg raised regressive property and sales tax rates in the city while instituting multibillion-dollar property tax breaks for the Hudson Yards district, even though Senator Charles Schumer, among others, argued that such tax breaks were unnecessary because the city was already subsidizing the district through a subway line extension. In contrast, de Blasio firmly rebuffed JPMorgan Chase when the mega-bank sought $1 billion in subsidies to build a new headquarters in Hudson Yards. That would have been on top of $600 million in reduced taxes from the discount scheme Bloomberg had put in place.

The contrast between de Blasio and his predecessors is especially evident on issues affecting low-wage workers. Bloomberg steadfastly opposed the expansion of living-wage requirements, and he severely undermined union labor standards for thousands of low-paid child-care workers and school-bus drivers. Through his housing development and rezoning agenda, Bloomberg enriched developers without putting much priority on affordable housing.

While Cuomo’s support for the $15 minimum wage and paid family leave is to his credit, his budget and tax policies appear to have been inspired by anti-tax conservatives. The governor’s cap on local property tax increases (the lesser of 2 percent or inflation) and his cap of 2 percent on state spending growth have limited the potential for progressive policies. Revenues have been growing—at about the same 4 percent to 5 percent annual rate for both the city and state—but de Blasio and Cuomo have responded differently. De Blasio has increased municipal spending by 5.1 percent annually, while Cuomo has adhered to his self-imposed 2 percent spending cap and used the projected revenue growth exceeding 2 percent to cut taxes.  The beneficiaries of those reduced taxes include Wall Street giants and buyers of yachts and private jets. Cuomo also plans to let New York’s “millionaire tax” expire at the end of 2017 to provide a $3.7 billion windfall to the richest 1 percent.

New York City’s experience under de Blasio affirms that progressive mayors can reduce inequality, especially by helping low-income people. The city could do more with a supportive state government, not to mention changes in national policy affecting unions, financial market regulation, and other issues. But New York City under de Blasio ought to be a model for progressive leaders in other cities. Reported by The American Prospect 14 hours ago.

Nine questions with the outgoing director of ​Health Care For All

$
0
0
Amy Whitcomb Slemmer will said goodbye to Boston-based health care advocacy group Health Care For All on Saturday after eight years with the organization, with plans to finish the ordination process of becoming an Episcopal priest. The move comes just a few months after the non-profit health care advocacy organization had to lay off six staff members — 15 percent of its workforce — to deal with budget constraints, and comes as the organization pivots from ensuring everyone has health insurance… Reported by bizjournals 13 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images