Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

New Health Benefits Survey Shows Continued Employer Focus on Containing Costs

$
0
0
Conrad Siegel Actuaries Releases Results from its Annual Medical and Prescription Drug Survey

Harrisburg, PA (PRWEB) May 25, 2016

Conrad Siegel Actuaries, delivering comprehensive employee benefits services, today announced the results of its annual Medical and Prescription Drug survey, an employee benefits survey measuring how Central PA businesses manage health benefits.

The survey, which was conducted in December 2015, indicates that employers are turning to consumer directed health care and are tightening spousal rules as cost containment strategies.

“As employers’ health insurance costs rise, they are continuing to drop or put restrictions around spousal coverage. Limiting working spousal coverage is an attempt to shift a portion of these increasing costs back to the spouse’s employer, as opposed to making even more drastic cuts to benefit levels for all of their own employees,” said Rob Glus, partner at Conrad Siegel Actuaries. “We also continue to see employers offering more consumer directed health care plans as a natural course for cost containment.”

Continued Cutbacks & Surcharges on Spousal Coverage
Thirty-three percent of employers have some form of spousal coverage provision for medical and prescription drug insurance. Of those who have a provision, 52 percent of employers do not allow spousal coverage if a spouse has health insurance access through their own employer. This percentage increased from 31 percent in 2014 and 25 percent in 2013. Of employers who do offer spousal coverage, 27 percent required a surcharge to cover the spouse, compared to 16 percent in 2014. The average surcharge in 2015 was $2,288, which increased from $1,730 in 2014.

Employer Premium Sharing Remains Steady
The survey revealed that employer premium sharing remains steady (as a percentage of overall premiums), as employers change the benefit plan design instead of shifting more premium costs to employees. In 2015, only 11 percent of surveyed companies did not require employees to pay any amount of plan premiums. The average percentage of the medical premium that employees paid for single coverage in 2015 was 15 percent, which has remained relatively constant over the past several years. The average premium share for family coverage was 20 percent in 2015.

Consumer Directed Health Care Plans Increase
Consumer directed health care plans are generally high-deductible health plans that include Health Savings Accounts (HSA), Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRA), Medical Expense Reimbursement Plans (MERP) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA). The HSA programs are tax-preferred medical savings accounts where employees can contribute and withdraw money for out-of-pocket medical, prescription, dental and vision costs. The HRA programs, commonly offered with high-deductible health plans, are tax-advantaged plans where employers set aside pre-tax dollars for employees to pay for health care expenses.·     Overall, 50 percent of employers offer a plan with either an HSA or an HRA account option. This is up significantly from last year at 41 percent.
·     In 2015, 24 percent of employers offered a HSA to their employees. This increased from 2014, when 20 percent of employers offered an HSA.
·     Of employers who offer a HSA, 79 percent fund at least part of the account.
·     The average employer funding for individuals in an HSA account is approximately $769, and the average funding for families is $1,337. This is down from $847 and $1,560 in 2014, respectively.
·     In 2015, 26 percent of employers offered a HRA or a MERP to employees. This increased from 2014, when twenty-one percent of employers offered an HRA.
·     The average employer funding for individuals in an HRA account is approximately $1,743, and the average funding for families is $3,204. This is down from $1,916 and $3,194 in 2014, respectively.
·     In 2015, 47 percent of employers offered a FSA to employees, the exact same figure as the prior year.

Over 110 companies of all sizes responded to the survey with 65 percent coming from organizations with more than 100 employees. Companies that responded to the survey were from both not-for-profit and for-profit organizations in a wide range of industries including Education, Healthcare, Social Assistance, Government, Manufacturing, and Finance.

Conrad Siegel Actuaries maintains one of the largest, most comprehensive regional employee benefit databases available in central Pennsylvania. Through its regional employee benefits survey program, Conrad Siegel Actuaries is able to benchmark the best practices surrounding local employer benefit programs.

For more information about the Conrad Siegel Actuaries Health & Welfare Survey or to participate, please contact the Benefit Survey Team at benefitsurvey(at)conradsiegel(dot)com.

About Conrad Siegel
Conrad Siegel Actuaries, named the 2015 Best-in-Retirement Business Award™ winner by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc, is one of the largest and most respected employee benefit firms in the Mid-Atlantic region. Recognized as both an industry leader and a trusted advisor, the firm stands apart by offering independent, fee-based services backed by careful attention to detail. Conrad Siegel partners with its clients to offer a comprehensive source for all employee benefit needs. For more information, please visit http://www.conradsiegel.com.

Conrad Siegel Actuaries and its employees are independent of and are not employees or agents of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (“Schwab”). Schwab does not prepare, verify or endorse information distributed by Conrad Siegel Actuaries. The Best-in-Retirement Business IMPACT Award™, part of Schwab’s IMPACT Awards® program, is not an endorsement, testimonial endorsement, recommendation or referral to Conrad Siegel Actuaries with respect to its investment advisory and other services. Reported by PRWeb 15 hours ago.

Travel With Peace of Mind: TravelInsurance.com Reminds Travelers to Purchase Travel Insurance Before Summer Vacations

$
0
0
The leading travel insurance comparison website provides tips on how to identify the best trip insurance policies for each traveler before summer begins

New York, N.Y. (PRWEB) May 25, 2016

Despite recent State Department warnings and global events, recent data indicates that 75 percent of Americans are still planning to travel this summer*. According to leading travel insurance comparison website, TravelInsurance.com, the top international destinations for their customers this summer are Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Mexico and Canada. TravelInsurance.com reminds consumers looking forward to domestic or international travel that the best time to secure coverage for their getaways is before the season begins.

“Our customers are asking us about the Zika virus, heightened security in Europe and the upcoming Olympic games in Brazil this August,” said Stan Sandberg, Co-Founder of TravelInsurance.com. “While uncertainty around the globe isn’t stopping people from traveling, smart travelers are looking for ways to protect their trips. A quality travel insurance plan can protect a traveler’s investment and provide travel medical benefits and services while on their trips, helping give travelers peace of mind during their summer vacations.”

Whether sticking close to home or going overseas, consumers have a choice of many travel insurance policy options for their particular summer travel plans. TravelInsurance.com advises what to look for when researching policies:· Trip Cancellation insurance covers pre-payments for holiday travel arrangements that may be interrupted or cancelled due to covered reasons such as extreme weather (flooding, hurricanes, etc.), sickness or injuries, and other issues. Coverage varies by policy.

· Medical Travel insurance limits the financial burden of emergency medical coverage for those who fall ill or are injured while traveling. Such coverage is particularly significant for international travelers, as standard health insurance plans sometimes do not cover medical bills from another country.

· Medical Evacuation insurance will cover costs associated with transportation costs to a qualified hospital in a medical emergency if the local facilities are inadequate. Such policies are particularly applicable to international travelers – especially those headed for remote destinations or off the tourist track.

· Adventure Sports insurance is offered as an optional upgrade to cover high-risk activities such as scuba diving, surfing, white water rafting, and other extreme sports popular with holiday travelers that would otherwise be excluded.

TravelInsurance.com makes shopping for travel insurance easy and affordable, empowering travelers with the ability to quickly find, compare and choose the appropriate travel insurance policy that meets their – and their family members’ – needs and fits their budget. TravelInsurance.com offers plans from a variety of trusted travel insurance companies. It takes only a few minutes online to discover the right plan at the right price with the right protection for any trip. Consumers can then buy directly and securely through the website and receive their policy via email within minutes.

For more information or to purchase travel insurance policies, visit Travel Insurance.

[*Summer travel data collected by Orbitz, LLC.]

# # #
About TravelInsurance.com
TravelInsurance.com helps to simplify the complicated world of travel insurance by providing consumers with the easiest way to compare and buy trip insurance coverage online or over the phone. A member company of the U.S. Travel Insurance Association, owned and operated by DigiVentures Holdings, LLC, a licensed agency that works with some of the largest travel insurers in the industry, TravelInsurance.com offers for a wide selection of plans, secures every purchase with high-grade Verisign 256-bit secured encryption, and helps clientele find the appropriate travel insurance policy that meets their needs without exceeding their budget. Purchases can be made directly through the website, with policies sent via email within minutes. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

The Latest: Democrats Blame Contractor for Cover Oregon Woes

$
0
0
Democrats on a congressional committee blame a contractor for the mishaps surrounding Oregon's health insurance enrollment website Reported by ABCNews.com 12 hours ago.

Americans are fatter than ever, CDC survey finds

$
0
0
The results are in from the one of the largest and broadest surveys of health in the United States. And although many of the findings are encouraging -- more Americans had health insurance and fewer smoked cigarettes in 2015 than in previous years -- the gains were overshadowed by rising rates of obesity and diabetes. Reported by CNN.com 12 hours ago.

House panel calls for criminal probe into failed Oregon health care exchange

$
0
0
Ex-Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber and his staff mismanaged the creation of the state’s doomed health insurance website, including by making decisions based on his re-election campaign, according to a congressional report released Wednesday which seeks a criminal probe. Reported by FOXNews.com 9 hours ago.

Germany's Hidden Crisis

$
0
0
Germany is poor, but not in terms of commodities, services, income, or capital. Germany is poor in terms of opportunities for the future. The reason is simple: in the future, the adults, children and newborns of today will have to pay off the debts and obligations that are currently being incurred. And that's a tough spot to be in.

In 2013, Germany's national debt amounted to 72.5 percent of its annual GDP, and that percentage is decreasing. The federal government aims to meet the Maastricht limit -- which dictates that the debt-to-GDP ratio must not exceed 60 percent. But is that really a reason to sit back and relax?

No. Because these state debts are only the so-called explicit debts. The German government has other financial obligations, such as federal bonds, which we will all have to pay for in the future. These include, for example, pensions for civil servants. Many of these programs were established in the '70s. Many of these civil servants will enter a well-deserved retirement in the next few years, and they will expect their pensions to be deposited on time. But there are basically no financial precautions in place to ensure that. That money will have to be paid out of the state's normal tax income.

The social security benefits for employees are also being dangerously overdrawn. Every year, the state transfers a multi-billion-euro subsidy into the retirement fund (in 2016, for example, it deposited 14 billion euros) so that all retirees may be paid the pensions they're entitled to fully and on time. That subsidy must also be earned back in taxes every year.

And the same is true, of course, for a number of other social services: basic pension, integration assistance for people with disabilities, housing support, supplementary unemployment benefits, medical care and health insurance for low-income citizens, etc. Individually, all these payments make sense. Collectively, they represent massive sums of money -- which in the future will need to be earned back and paid out again.

These promised payments are considered "implicit debts" because -- like regular debts -- they have to be paid. There's no question of choice anymore -- the obligation to pay up is written in the constitution. The difference between explicit and implicit debts is called the sustainability gap; In 2013, this gap was a full 237 per cent of the GDP -- a whopping 6,484 billion euros.

If Germany were a business, we would need to build up reserves equivalent to that amount. But because that will not be done, we are going to have to finance these sums out of the running income in the future. This may mean that in the future, less money will be available for such expenditures as education, infrastructure, or research. In other words, the sustainability gap impoverishes our chances for the future -- and it is the weakest members of our society who will suffer most as a result.

Today, successful German businesses would rather invest abroad than in aging Germany.

Many of the measures taken by the Great Coalition have made the sustainability gap worse, including changing the retirement age to 63 and providing supplementary income for mothers. But the biggest reason behind the size of the sustainability gap is demographic change.

If fewer and fewer young people are financing services but more and more older people are demanding those services (namely pensions, social security, health and medical services), then the gap keeps growing and the leeway for the future keeps declining.

Migration would be a very effective measure to reduce the sustainability gap. Migrants are generally younger than Germans, and so over the course of their lifetimes, they can finance more services than they demand.

The important thing is for migration to be taxed, and for it to be tailored to the demands of the German labor market. For example, it would be most helpful for the German labor market to receive workers in the manufacturing and medical sectors.

According to calculations by Professor Raffelhüschen, a sustainability researcher, the right migration law could reduce the German sustainability gap from 237 percent to 217 percent. These numbers show that even migration would be only one among many measures needed to fight for Germany's impoverished future.

But it would also be tragic to fail to take advantage of that part of the solution. Because a shrinking and aging population could quickly lead to a future of poverty -- without migration, Germany shrinks by about the size of a city of 150,000 to 200,000.

Today, successful German businesses would rather invest abroad than in an aging Germany. As a result, fewer jobs and less value are created at home. Only the rich can afford a shrinking society. And the impoverished future will become an impoverished present faster than we think.

This post first appeared on HuffPost Germany. It has been translated into English and edited for clarity.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

Congressional panel releases critical Cover Oregon report

$
0
0
SALEM, Oregon (AP) — A Republican-led U.S. House committee has found former Gov. John Kitzhaber and a federal agency mishandled the creation of Oregon’s health insurance enrollment website, with the Democratic governor’s political advisers making decisions based on his re-election campaign. In a staff report released Wednesday, the Republicans on the committee said they are […] Reported by Seattle Times 9 hours ago.

A.M. Best Revises Outlooks to Positive for Health Services Welfare Society Limited

$
0
0
A.M. Best Revises Outlooks to Positive for Health Services Welfare Society Limited SINGAPORE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A.M. Best has revised the outlooks to positive from stable and affirmed the financial strength rating of B (Fair) and the issuer credit rating of "bb+" of Health Services Welfare Society Limited (New Zealand), trading as Accuro Health Insurance (Accuro). The outlook revisions to positive reflect Accuro’s adequate risk-adjusted capitalization and favorable trend in underwriting performance over the past five years. The underwriting gains were achieved through continue Reported by Business Wire 10 hours ago.

Health insurers seek 2017 rate hikes in Kentucky

$
0
0
There could be "significant rate increases" in health insurance premiums in Kentucky in 2017. That's according to the Kentucky Department of Insurance, which said today that insurers have requested rate hikes as high as 65 percent on some plans sold in the state. The proposed rates are for small-group and individual policies sold both on and off of Kentucky's exchange, Kynect, according to a news release. Insurers have to submit their coverage and rate plans for approval by the department. These… Reported by bizjournals 10 hours ago.

Oregon will stick with federal insurance exchange, for now

$
0
0
The Department of Consumer and Business Services plans to continue to use the federal platform for its health insurance exchange, rather than try again to build a state-based site. DCBS officials informed the state House and Senate interim health care committees earlier this week of their intention to stick with HealthCare.gov, at least for now. The department will revisit the issue in another three to five years. “In the interim, we will continue to monitor developments in technology,” said… Reported by bizjournals 7 hours ago.

Congressional Panel Releases Critical Cover Oregon Report

$
0
0
A Republican-led U.S. House committee has found former Gov. John Kitzhaber and a federal agency mishandled the creation of Oregon's health insurance enrollment website Reported by ABCNews.com 6 hours ago.

Zane Benefits Releases New eBook: Sample Section 105 Medical Reimbursement Plan

$
0
0
New Resource Provides a Blueprint for Individual Health Insurance Reimbursement

Salt Lake City, Utah (PRWEB) May 26, 2016

Zane Benefits, the leader in individual health insurance reimbursement for small businesses, announced today the publication of a new resource, "Sample Section 105 Medical Reimbursement Plan." The guide helps small businesses understand and set up an individual health insurance reimbursement program.

According to Zane Benefits, a significant milestone for small and growing businesses is offering employee health benefits. For most small businesses, however, traditional employer health insurance is out of reach. The cost is too high or the company cannot meet eligibility requirements.

As a result, small businesses are approaching employee health benefits a little differently. Instead of contributing to employer health insurance coverage, businesses are setting up Section 105 Medical Reimbursement Plans to reimburse employees for individual health insurance coverage.

Individual health insurance reimbursement is being widely adopted because small employers need affordable, financially sustainable healthcare options. Individual health insurance offers employees permanent, quality health insurance and Section 105 Plans offer employers a way to contribute to employees' healthcare expenses.

The new guide provides small business owners and leadership teams with practical tools, information, and worksheets to understand how to use Section 105 Plans for individual health insurance reimbursement.

The 13-page eBook is available for free download at the zanebenefits.com website and covers the following topics:· Setting up and designing a Section 105 plan
· Plan document requirements
· Three options for plan administration
· Compliance considerations
· Evaluating the cost of a Section 105 plan

About Zane Benefits, Inc.

Zane Benefits was founded in 2006 with a mission to consumerize employee benefits for small business. We have a vision for the world where employee benefits are actually employee benefits rather than employer benefits. "Consumerize" is the word we use to describe that vision. When small businesses offer Zane Benefits instead of traditional benefits, they save time and money by empowering employees with tax-free dollars. Using our online software platform (PeopleKeep®), small businesses help employees purchase their own benefits with real dollar contributions. Reported by PRWeb 22 hours ago.

Americans are fatter than ever, CDC survey finds

$
0
0
The results are in from the one of the largest and broadest surveys of health in the United States. And although many of the findings are encouraging -- more Americans had health insurance and fewer smoked cigarettes in 2015 than in previous years -- the gains were overshadowed by rising rates of obesity and diabetes. Reported by CNN.com 20 hours ago.

New-to-market company plans 12 locations in South Florida

$
0
0
After recently gaining approval to offer health insurance in Florida, Harken Health announced plans to open 12 care centers in Miami-Dade and Broward counties. Harken Health, a new subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare, offers plans through independent insurance brokers and on the federal health insurance marketplace under the Affordable Care Act. Its members are matched with a “care team” at one of its health centers to manage their health care. There is no co-pay for primary care visits. “We’ve… Reported by bizjournals 18 hours ago.

Did state rush Horizon health plan approval? Judges will decide

$
0
0
The OMNIA tiered plans have been touted as a major shake-up to health insurance landscape in New Jersey Reported by NJ.com 17 hours ago.

This Is How Much Your Health Insurance Payment Is About To Jump By

$
0
0
This Is How Much Your Health Insurance Payment Is About To Jump By It's official: years of warnings that Obamacare will lead to dramatic increases in healthcare premiums are about to be validated.

As the WSJ writes, big health plans stung by losses in the first few years of the U.S. health law’s implementation are seeking hefty premium increases for individual plans sold through insurance exchanges in more than a dozen states.

To be sure, we have extensively covered the imminent danger of rising healthcare prices as a result of Obamacare's intrusive intervention in the insurance sector; however now that this is about to become mainstream information, we expect consumers to hunker down and save even more in anticipation of what is about to be a shock price increase for millions of middle-class American families.

As the WSJ reports, the insurers’ proposed rates for individual coverage in states that have made their 2017 requests public largely bear out health plans’ grim predictions about their challenges under the health-care overhaul. *According to the insurers’ filings with regulators, large plans in states including New York, Pennsylvania and Georgia are seeking to raise rates by 20% or more.*

In states such as Florida and Maryland, insurers are seeking to raise premiums by percentage averages that are markedly above 10%. Among those that have published so far, only in Vermont do big insurers’ requests fall below 10%.  Proposals still have to be approved by state regulators, and a full picture of final approved rates across the entire country likely won’t be known until shortly before HealthCare.gov and state equivalents reopen for the law’s fourth main enrollment window on Nov. 1.

Nonetheless, the proposed average increases that are available are a vivid indicator this year of how insurers are adapting to the 2010 Affordable Care Act’s transformation of the way health coverage is priced and sold in the U.S.

So for all those currently enrolled in healthcare plans administered in the following states, this is how much, on average, your plans will go up by.

 

The silver lining? Since this effective tax goes straight to "boosting US GDP", we look forward to a year of "above trendling" GDP growth thanks to this forced reallocation of consumers' disposable income into the infamous "healthcare" category. Reported by Zero Hedge 15 hours ago.

Bright Health Partners with Centura Health to Bring New Health Insurance Concept to Colorado

$
0
0
Bright Health Partners with Centura Health to Bring New Health Insurance Concept to Colorado MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New health insurance startup Bright Health announced today its first market and care provider partnership with Colorado-based health system Centura Health. The collaboration pairs the pioneering leadership of Centura Health with Bright Health’s innovative health insurance solution to bring a new option to Colorado consumers. “Bright Health is differentiated by developing a single, exclusive partnership in each market with a leading health system,” said Bob Sheehy, Reported by Business Wire 14 hours ago.

Hope For Heroes and USA Medical Card Honor Memorial Day

$
0
0
On May 30th, Hope For Heroes and USA Medical Card will remember those individuals who died serving the country.

Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) May 26, 2016

On Memorial Day, Hope For Heroes and USA Medical Card will remember the men and women who lost their lives in military battle for the country. The nonprofit Hope For Heroes partnered with the leading provider of free pharmacy discount cards in 2015 to provide more programs that empower independence for disabled military veterans, as well as police, firemen, and EMS professionals across the country, and help more people afford necessary prescriptions.

"Every day, my foundation remembers those who have given their lives to our great country. With support from USA Medical Card, our group has been able to expand our work with our nation's disabled heroes," said Mitch Serlin, Founder and President of Hope For Heroes. "We have been able to help servicemen and servicewomen heal and experience the personal accomplishment that can come from participation in our programs."

Currently, funds from USA Medical Card are helping a capital campaign to build a second facility. The new location will provide a broader array of outdoor activities and allow the organization to significantly increase the number of heroes that supported annually.

The free pharmacy discount card benefitting Hope for Heroes can be used at more than 60,000 pharmacies across the country — at local, regional and national chains such as CVS, Costco, Target, Rite Aid, Walmart and Walgreens. The donation from USA Medical Card is raised at no cost to cardholders.

The pre-activated card can reduce the price of brand name and generic prescription drugs by as much as 75%. Eligible prescription medications include those frequently prescribed for heart disease, hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes and other health conditions. It can be used by individuals to complement their health insurance plan — to help fill in gaps — or by the uninsured. The card is commonly used on Zolpidem, Amoxicillin, Lisinopril, Metformin and thousands of other popular medications.

"It is a great honor to be working with Hope For Heroes and making a difference in the lives of the nation's heroes. Our program helps people save money on prescriptions while helping wounded heroes restore a healthy, active lifestyle," said USA Medical Card Co-Founder and President Jordan Sessler. "This sponsorship will help ensure more funds are available to help strengthen a community of hope and healing."

The card is available at http://www.USAMedicalCard.com/HopeForHeroes, where you can download a card or request one be texted, mailed or emailed to you. You can also text HopeForHeroes to 95577 or email HopeForHeroes(at)USAMedicalCard(dot)com.

About Hope For Heroes
For more information about the Hope For Heroes Foundation, please visit http://www.heroeshope.org.

About USA Medical Card
USA Medical Card was founded to provide prescription savings to the estimated over 100 million people in America with inadequate prescription coverage. The company reaches out to families, individuals and seniors who are most at risk, and whose health would be compromised without the savings the pharmacy discount card provides. USA Medical Card has been given an “A+” rating by the Better Business Bureau. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

Hard Times And False Narratives

$
0
0
Hard Times And False Narratives Submitted by Jim Quinn via The Burning Platform blog,

*The mainstream media mouthpieces for the establishment peddle false narratives, disingenuous storylines, and outright propaganda* to keep the ignorant masses confused, oblivious to reality, misinformed, and passively submissive to the opinions of highly paid “experts” and captured fiscal authorities. *The existing social order likes things just as they are.*

They reap ill-gotten riches, wield unchecked power, and control the minds of the masses. They are the invisible government consciously manipulating the minds, habits and opinions of the multitudes in order to dominate society, control the levers of government, and accumulate obscene levels of wealth through manipulation of the currency and domination of the banking and corporate interests.

*One of the false narratives being flogged by the establishment propaganda peddlers is the mass retirement of Baby Boomers causing the plunge in the employment to population rate from 64.4% in 2000 to 59.7% today. *They need to peddle this drivel, because the difference between these two rates amounts to 12 million missing jobs. The employment to population ratio is currently at 1984 levels. Any critical thinking person with basic math skills realizes the government reported unemployment rate of 5% is an Orwellian farce.

Over 40% of working age Americans aren’t working, amounting to 102 million people, and the establishment touts the ludicrous lie of a 5% unemployment rate. With only 123 million Americans employed full-time and virtually all the job “growth” since 2009 in non-producing low paying service jobs in the retail, restaurant, hospitality and healthcare industries, wages and household income remain stagnant. *The 12 million shortfall in jobs isn’t due to Boomers retiring, as this chart proves beyond a shadow of a doubt. Only an Ivy League educated economist or CNBC talking head could pretend to be confused.*

*We know for a fact 10,000 Americans have been turning 65 years old every day for the last few years and will for the next fifteen years. *When the employment to population ratio peaked in 2000 at 64.4%, the ratio for senior citizens was only 12%. It had remained between 10% and 12% for over two decades. There were 35 million Americans over 65 years old in 2000, and 31 million of the them were not employed. They made up a large portion (44%) of the 70 million people not in the labor force.

*Today there are 48 million Americans over 65 years old, and 39 million of them are not employed. *The establishment narrative is blown to smithereens by the FACT they now only account for 41% of the 94 million people not in the labor force. There are only 14 million more employed Americans today than in the year 2000, while there are 5 million more employed Americans over the age of 65. They have accounted for 36% of all the jobs created in the last 16 years. The percentage of senior citizens working is at an all-time high of 18.9% and rising.

*The narrative of retiring Baby Boomers being the cause for the plunging participation rate is entirely false. *The data is not hidden. It’s easily accessible. Any CNBC pundit, Wall Street Journal reporter, or Ivy League MBA Wall Street analyst with even a smattering of math skills could discern the truth. Based on the fact they continue to flog false narratives, makes you believe their job and intent is to obscure the truth, obfuscate the facts, and paint a rosy picture for their establishment bosses. There are almost 4 million less Americans aged 16 to 55 employed today than there were in 2007. *Does that happen in an economic recovery?*

Since 2007 the working age population has grown by 21 million, while the number of employed Americans is only 4.6 million higher.* Those over 55 years old account for 174% of the employment gain since 2007. Does that sound like a mass boomer retirement story?* The best part is the government perpetuating the Big Lie by saying the unemployment rate today is essentially the same as in 2007 at around 5%. You just pretend 15.3 million able bodied working age Americans left the labor force of their own free will and do not want a job. You then create a narrative of Boomer retirement which is beaten like a dead horse by the captured corporate MSM until the ignorant masses believe it.

*There is a reason senior citizens are working until they keel over while greeting the creatures of Wal-Mart. The economy has not recovered for the average working jamoke. *The Federal Reserve has crushed the finances of senior citizens since 2000. Their reckless monetary policies created two massive bubbles, destroying the net worth of millions of older Americans. Their “Save a Wall Street Banker” solutions to the worldwide financial crisis they created have gutted the savings of seniors. Seniors now have to decide whether to pay the rent or pay for their heart medicine, thanks to those heroes of the status quo – Ben and Janet.

*The relentless inflation in food, rent and healthcare created by the Fed and getting 0% on their savings has left millions of seniors destitute and desperate. *They aren’t working because they’re bored. They aren’t lugging bags of cow manure in the garden center at Lowes because they love being close to nature. They are working during their retirement years because they don’t like the taste of Fancy Feast. Despite the happy talk by politicians like Obama about the economic recovery, real people living in the real world are living through a Depression.

*The stock market soared during the 1930s. GDP rose during the 1930s. But, they still call it the Great Depression. *We have been in the midst of a Greater Depression since 2000. The ruling class uses all their powers of media propaganda persuasion, utilization of highly paid “expert” whores, and a myriad of technological bread and circuses to keep the masses dumbed down, sedated, amused and confused. The percentage of 25 to 54 year olds working today is at an all-time low. The percentage of men working today is at an all-time low. These facts are not reported by the dying legacy MSM.

*If you feel like you haven’t gotten ahead in the last sixteen  years, you’re right.* Real median household income is lower than it was in 2000. The ruling class is confident their public education system has sufficiently dumbed down the populace so they don’t understand the difference between nominal and real. In addition, the powers that be control the definition and calculation of inflation, so the inflation numbers used to define real median household income are entirely false and significantly understated. Using true inflation numbers would reveal household income to be dramatically lower than it was in 2000.* It is actually lower than it was in 1971, when Nixon closed the gold window.*

*The numbers and narrative presented by the establishment simply don’t pass the smell test. If the economy had been recovering for the last seven years, millions of good paying jobs had been created and unemployment is really only 5%, then why have retailers been reporting atrocious sales and plunging profits? Why have corporate profits fallen for four straight quarters? Why is every economic indicator flashing red while the BLS says the employment situation has never been better? *Challenger, Grey and Christmas surveys the real world and reports:

Employers have announced a total of 250,061 planned job cuts through the first four months of 2016. That is up 24 percent from the 201,796 job cuts tracked during the same period a year ago. It is the highest January-April total since 2009, when the opening four months of the year saw 695,100 job cuts.

*Do you believe corrupt government drones or a private enterprise totaling up real layoff notices from real companies? *Consumer debt is at all-time highs as people are depending on their credit cards to survive. Obamacare created premium increases are destroying the finances of families and small businesses across America. Home prices are at all-time highs, shutting most people out of the market and creating such high rental demand that rents are also at all-time highs and rising rapidly. Gas prices are up over 30% since February. Food prices are up 10% since the start of the year. At least senior citizens got a 0% increase in their Social Security benefits this year because there is NO INFLATION.

The chart of despair below reflects the relentless decline in the standard of living for the average American household. The wages of the American worker have fallen or remained stagnant for decades, while the government reports an ever expanding GDP. *If GDP is dependent upon consumer expenditures to generate 69% of its total, how could it grow as real household incomes decline?*

*If you guessed enormous amounts of debt, you win the booby prize. *The establishment (Wall Street, mega-corps, politicians, corporate media) convinced the masses to impoverish themselves while trying to live an unattainable lifestyle using credit cards, mortgages, auto loans, and student loan debt. *Who benefited from the enslavement of the masses in debt? The debt peddlers, mega-corps, paid off politicians, and media maggots. They need a believable narrative to keep their profits flowing.*

*The absurdity of government’s economic recovery narrative is revealed as nothing more than a debt financed mirage to allow the .01% ruling class to pillage what remains of the national wealth before initiating another collapse designed to further increase their power and control.* When a senior citizen has to borrow to pay the rent, that increases GDP. When your health insurance premiums go up by 25%, that increases GDP. When Obama drones a hospital in the Middle East, that increases GDP. When the government loans a functionally illiterate dolt $20,000 for college and they spend it on Spring Break in Daytona Beach, that increases GDP. The chart below shows the more than 100% increase in government handouts since 2000. What a boon to GDP as the government extracts money from the producers and hands it to the non-producers.

*We are living in hard times. *The reason tens of millions of Americans are rejecting the establishment and voting for Trump and Sanders is because of economic hardship. *Most Americans have been screwed over by the system and are finally getting fed up. They aren’t exactly sure who screwed them, how they were screwed, or how to stop getting screwed, but they are angry. And someone is going to pay.*

*The status quo is beginning to get nervous. *Their usual propaganda, scare tactics and misinformation campaigns don’t seem to be working. Rigging the stock market upward may benefit the .01% temporarily, but the games of financial manipulation have a limit – and we are approaching it. As a society we have relied upon debt, delusion and denial for far too long. We have chosen to be willfully ignorant regarding the truth of our predicament. Entire segments of society live under a blanket of lies and hate anyone revealing the truth.* Some have begun to speak the truth and will be hated for doing so. A long hot summer of hate is upon us. And that’s the truth.* Reported by Zero Hedge 11 hours ago.

Why Hillary Clinton is the Strongest Equality Candidate

$
0
0
Conventional wisdom about election 2016 holds that Hillary Clinton, an "establishment" candidate, is opposed by two "populist insurgents," Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, said to speak for working class voters. But a clear-eyed look tells a very different story: Hillary offers effective ways to reduce the growing economic gaps that matter most to lower and middle income families - and she has also attracted the broadest support from working Americans of modest means.

Certainly The Donald has galvanized a true rank and file revolt. By drawing into GOP primaries many older white voters who normally sit out until the general election, Trump held his own in a fractured field long enough to grab the 2016 nomination. Although his voters are often said to be economically struggling white workers, in fact (as Nate Silver has shown) Trump primary voters typically earn about $72,000 year, well above the U.S. median of $56,000. Although Trump voters express economic anxiety, they are solidly middle-income whites angry about immigration and racial and generational changes. Above all, they hate Barack Obama and appreciate that Trump led the "birther" campaign questioning his legitimacy. They are, in short, pretty much the same sorts of grassroots Republicans Vanessa Williamson and I studied for our early 2012 book on the Tea Party.

Of course Trump was not the choice of GOP and plutocratic elites, who prefer to stoke popular anger indirectly rather than through in-your-face Trump-style immigrant-bashing and racial fear-mongering. Trump puts off women voters, even the married white women who usually vote for the GOP; and he hints at economic policies that worry free-market proponents of unfettered trade and entitlement cuts. Even so, GOP elites and Trump are coming to terms as they gear up for the general election. Trump's tax plan outlines even greater reductions in top tax rates than other GOP plans; and his proposed Supreme Court appointees would redouble Scalia-like assaults on New Deal economic programs, minority voting rights, and individual liberties. GOP leaders hope popular anger will carry Trump to office, where he can be managed by orthodox advisors and sign Paul Ryan's sweeping tax and spending cuts into law.

Many who agree that Trump is a fake populist would still accept Bernie's claim to be the strongest egalitarian. Railing against the top one percent, Bernie calls for whopping increases in taxes on the wealthiest and aims to bust Wall Street banks and ban big money from U.S. elections. Nevertheless, the Sanders agenda does little to address the country's other growing economic gap - between the top 20% and everyone else. Fortunes are sharply diverging between the top fifth of Americans, mostly dual-income families led by two highly educated professionals or managers, versus everyone else, the bottom four-fifths of middle and lower income single and dual parent families trying to raise children with stagnant incomes, dwindling social benefits, and often living in disorderly communities where jobs and good schools, even safe drinking water, are not to be found.

Bernie touts universal health care and free college tuition, but such proposals could actually exacerbate the 20/80 divide. Independent studies show that Bernie's health plan would raise taxes and reduce health insurance benefits for many who now get Medicaid, Medicare, or employer health benefits; and more new benefits would go to the top fifth of households than to the bottom fifth. Free tuition would also waste resources on upper-middle-income families that can afford to pay or borrow to cover at least some college costs. Sanders also pushes a carbon tax to tackle global warming - yet has not outlined any plan to rebate or redistribute the tax revenues to protect low and middle-income Americans against hits from higher energy costs.

Hillary Clinton has detailed many policies for the eighty percent. Her "debt free" college plan would deliver more help to defray all college costs to families that need it most and allow community colleges serve many more students. Similarly, Hillary wants to shift social spending toward the majority of working families - with paid family leave and affordable child care and through reductions in health costs and extension of coverage in the already-reformed health insurance system to the nine percent not already covered. She has firmly promised not to raise taxes on most Americans. The fact that Bernie wants to raise the national minimum wage to $15 an hour rather than $12 may seem an important difference, but both Democrats have made clear they would sign into law any level of hike Congress would approve.

Policy proposals and voter support need not line up. Even so, Hillary Clinton has won millions more primary votes. Both Hillary and Bernie supporters make about $61,000 a year, less than primary voters for Trump or other Republicans. But this parallel masks telling racial and age divides. Low-income and working-class Americans are now disproportionately people of color, and Clinton has received overwhelming support from African Americans and Latinos. She won primaries in large states with populations more ethnically and racially diverse than the nation as a whole, while Bernie's victories have mostly come in very white and relatively liberal states less diverse than the country as a whole. In fact, Hillary has attracted more support than Bernie from older working-aged whites. Enormous rallies and strong primary margins for Bernie often happen in college and university communities, where students have very low incomes right now but obviously enjoy brighter future economic prospects than the majority of non-college Americans.

In short, rhetoric about "establishment" versus populist candidates does not stand up to scrutiny. Hillary Clinton's program promotes economic equality for the many - and working class support for her is strong. Middle-aged and older women are also highly supportive - and should she follow Barack Obama to the White House, Hillary would finally break through the hardest barrier that has kept the female majority of U.S. citizens from seeing one of their own in the highest elected office. In every dimension - by race, class, and gender - a victory for Hillary Clinton would propel equality in America, building on the gains Barack Obama has achieved against fierce headwinds since 2008.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 12 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images