
The legislation would alter the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, cited by the Supreme Court in its ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, which passed both Houses of Congress and was signed by President Bill Clinton.
Hatch remarked that the bill would distort the purpose of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, reminding observers that he teamed up with Senator Ted Kennedy to introduce the bill over 20 years ago, which passed 97-3.
“We believe that public policy issues can be addressed in a way that upholds, rather than ignores, religious liberty,” he said at a press conference on Wednesday outside the Capitol Building.
Hatch dismissed the bill as a purely political exercise.
“It’s hard for me to understand, but politics takes over sometimes in this body, and that’s what it’s all about,” Hatch said. “It’s pure politics, and I think it’s really stupid politics at that.”
The bill is expected to fail, as Democrats are seeking leverage against Republicans in the upcoming mid-term elections, accusing them of blocking women’s access to free contraception from their employers.
Hatch was joined by his colleague Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and members of faith-based groups, who spoke out against the bill.
“This is a political move today that is very unfortunate because it tramples on religious freedom,” Alexander said. “Every American should be concerned when any American’s religious freedom is trampled upon.”
Republicans and faith leaders insisted that the Hobby Lobby case was not about restricting employees' access to contraception, but took issue, rather, with abortifacients.
“We do not object to including contraceptions other than abortifacients in employee health insurance policies, provided that employers with religious objections to them are fully exempted,” explained Helen Gonzalez, the vice president of the National Association of Evangelicals.
Melissa Swearingen, the associate director of Government Relations for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, called the Hobby Lobby decision a “just outcome” allowing protections for people with different viewpoints in a pluralistic society. She argued that the bill proposed by the Senate would distort the original meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
“We won’t always agree, but we have to make space for people--even those we disagree with,” she said. “This bill does the exact opposite.” Reported by Breitbart 5 hours ago.