Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Horrible Bosses

$
0
0
AP Images/Warner Brothers

Do you believe everything your boss tells you? The answer probably depends—if he tells you the Cubs are going to win next year's World Series then maybe not, but if he tells you your benefits are being cut and explains the reason why, you'll probably take him at his word. After all, he's in charge of the business, so he should know.

But Tim Armstrong, the CEO of AOL (company motto: "More Than Just Your Grandmother's Email, Really!") must have thought his employees were pretty darn stupid when he told them last week that he was cutting their 401(k) contributions and blamed the change on the Affordable Care Act. He explained in an interview that the company had incurred $7 million in "Obamacare costs," whatever that's supposed to mean, and later complained that two employees who had "distressed babies" had cost the company $1 million each.

It's been said many times that once he passed significant health care reform, Barack Obama came to "own" the health care system, meaning he'd be blamed for every gripe anyone had about health care whether it had anything to do with his reform or not. And that is indeed happening. But it's not because of an instantaneous collective decision on the part of all Americans. It's because Tim Armstrong and thousands of other employers like him are doing everything they can to convince workers that their stagnant wages and shrinking benefits aren't the fault of the people who actually set those wages and benefits. This isn't just about who "owns" the health care system, it's about power and accountability in the workplace.

Armstrong happens to lead a high-profile company, and he quickly became the target of mockery and outrage over his move, since his explanation for the 401(k) cut was so plainly ridiculous. If by "Obamacare costs" he meant rising health premiums, well that's something you can't blame on the President. In fact, premiums have gone up every year since long before Barack Obama took office, and last year's increase for employer plans—4.8 percent for single coverage and 3.8 percent for family coverage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation—was low by recent historical standards. And one presumes that if those two AOL employees had "distressed babies" five years ago, the company's insurance would have paid for their care, and that wouldn't have been Barack Obama's fault either.

Not only that, the $7 million in supposedly crippling health care costs that left the company no choice but to cut retirement benefits just happens to be exactly half of Armstrong's average yearly compensation of $14 million for the years 2009 to 2012. Needless to say, he didn't offer to take a pay cut to improve the bottom line—that kind of thing is for the common folk. But all the bad publicity took its toll, and by the weekend he reversed the decision. Given that the company just had its best earnings quarter in a decade, they can afford it.

But something similar is happening at companies all over America. Even though health insurance premiums have risen every year, this year management is saying, "Don't blame us—it's Obamacare." Laying off workers? Cutting benefits? Refusing to give raises? Don't worry about the employees getting mad. Just tell them it's Obamacare.

And most of the time, they'll have no way to know anything different. There won't be national news stories about it, and if the HR person tells them the company's hands are tied, they'll accept the explanation. The boss's escape from accountability is complete. An AP poll late last year found that 76 percent of people with employer-sponsored plans said that changes in those plans, like increased premiums and higher co-pays, were because of the Affordable Care Act. Almost all of them are wrong. So where could they have gotten that idea?

With so many people still looking for work, most employees aren't going to grumble, at least not to the boss. If you want to squeeze the people who work for you, conditions have never been better. You can blame your decisions on somebody else, and with unions virtually extinct in so many sectors of the private economy, workers have no way to bargain over benefits and salary. For millions of Americans, the negotiation is no negotiation at all. They sit quietly while they're told, "The job pays this much. These are the benefits. If you don't like it, there's another person in line behind you we can hire."

To his credit, President Obama has tried to convince businesses that they can make healthy profits and still treat their employees well. He has sung the praises of Costco (where the starting wage is $11.50 an hour and the average is $21 an hour) so many times you'd almost expect to find him there offering free samples of cocktail franks after his term is up.

But the occasional presidential speech is nothing compared to the messages people get on the job. And the message they're increasingly receiving is this: You'll take what we offer and like it. And if you don't like it, don't blame the boss. It's somebody else's fault. Reported by The American Prospect 13 hours ago.

Equipment Leasing Marketplace LeaseQ Responds to the Effects of The Affordable Care Act on Medical Equipment Leasing and Financing

$
0
0
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 sent ripples through the medical equipment industry in 2013 and its lasting impact continues to be met with uncertainty as the New Year begins. Equipment leasing and financing marketplace LeaseQ comments on the impact of Obamacare on the medical equipment leasing industry.

Boston, MA (PRWEB) February 10, 2014

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has already driven extensive changes within the health care field, and these effects have had widespread impact within the medical equipment leasing industry. The greatest single factor affecting the industry continues to be the 2.3 percent excise tax levied on certain medical devices at the start of 2013. This section of the law met with criticism throughout the medical equipment industry when it was first introduced and forced medical equipment manufacturers to scramble to effectively integrate it into their pricing. Its impact continues to have wide-reaching impact the industry in 2014.

For more information on medical equipment leasing, click here:
https://www.leaseq.com/medical-equipment-leasing

The law known as Obamacare was enacted in 2010 with the dual goals of improving the affordability and quality of health insurance coverage across the United States, while simultaneously reducing costs for both individuals and the government. To achieve these goals, the law was written to including mandates, subsidies, and insurance exchanges in an effort to achieve its objectives. If the law works as it's intended, the Congressional Budget Office predicts that the Affordable Care Act will lower future government deficits and Medicare spending - although this outcome is far from certain.

How Will the Affordable Care Act Affect Medical Equipment Financing?

As the law continues to roll out over the next several years, there are a number of ways in which it will affect the medical equipment leasing industry. Due to the relative uncertainty around future medical reimbursement rates, some medical providers and medical centers have placed some or in many cases, all new equipment acquisitions on hold until they have a better sense of how the changes will affect their bottom lines. Regardless of whether the provider leases or purchases that equipment, this uncertainty could have a detrimental impact on the medical equipment industry as a whole.

Vernon Tirey, Chairman and CEO of medical equipment and financing marketplace LeaseQ was quoted as saying; "the legislation’s cost-cutting focus may force medical organizations and hospitals to outright cancel new equipment purchases for fear that the cost of acquisition may further drive up cost of care. Additionally, these same organizations are fearful that recent cuts in reimbursement rates will reduce their credit strength, leaving them susceptible to less than ideal financing terms. Although we at LeaseQ have not seen this credit issue firsthand with our lessees or lessors yet, this fear continues to persist. This alone has the potential to slow the overall demand for medical equipment."

Another factor to consider is that the federal government has given medical practices until the end of 2015 to have electronic management of records up to date before the penalty of losing a percentage of Medicare and Medicaid payments. Because of this, leasing becomes the ultimate option for practices to be able to afford the upgrade and not get penalized. LeaseQ is currently working with two companies that will be at the forefront of this implementation in the years to come.

The Opportunities for Equipment Financing

Despite the challenges the new law faces in the medical equipment sector, Tirey believes that medical equipment leasing will continue as the de facto means of acquiring medical equipment. Said Tirey, "when hospitals, health systems, and other health care organizations truly take the time to understand the impact of Obamacare on the industry, they'll quickly realize that medical equipment leasing is the smartest and most cost-effective means in which to acquire medical equipment, regardless of the negative stigma that surrounds the Affordable Care Act."

Continued Tirey, "We actually believe that some outcomes of the Affordable Care Act will have a net positive impact on medical organizations and hospitals financial positions, making them more favorable to lessors. Affordable insurance has the potential to reduce the focus and spending on collections from self-pay patients which could save providers time as well as money. This improved financial position of medical organizations and providers would be a positive for the industry. This is good news for the hospitals, for the patients, and for the health care equipment leasing industry as a whole."

Regardless of Obamacare, the benefits of medical equipment leasing remains. As the pace of technology advances quickens within the medical equipment industry, the demand for better, faster and newer equipment continues to transform patient care by enabling quicker and more accurate diagnoses and treatment for patents. And the easiest and most affordable way in which to acquire that equipment is through leasing and financing.

About LeaseQ

LeaseQ is an online comparison shopping platform composed of businesses, equipment dealers, and leasing/financing companies, designed to provide rapid and efficient approval of the equipment leasing and financing process. Seamlessly integrated into its platform, finance companies share with LeaseQ detailed underwriting criteria which allows business owners to compares rates all in under two minutes.

Since its launch in late 2012, LeaseQ has quickly become the largest online network of equipment dealers and equipment finance companies - assisting businesses of all types to quickly acquire the equipment they need at the rates and terms best suited for their needs. Based in Woburn MA, LeaseQ is one of the leading providers of equipment leasing and financing options in the country. Visit them online at https://www.leaseq.com . Reported by PRWeb 13 hours ago.

For your troubles, three weeks of free health insurance

$
0
0
The most popular insurer on New York's online marketplace for buying health insurance will be giving three weeks of free premiums to thousands of people. The reason: A deal that Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield cut to end state investigations into hundreds of complaints by customers who had just purchased health care coverage via the state's exchange. The exchanges are a central part of the federal Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare. The exchanges are aimed at lowering premiums… Reported by bizjournals 12 hours ago.

GOP Using My Old Playbook to Twist Facts about Obamacare and Jobs

$
0
0
If you're curious about what I used to do as a PR guy for the health insurance industry, how I often took facts and figures and twisted them to advance a specific political or financial agenda, take a look at the behavior of some members of Congress last week.

Like I used to do, they took numbers in a report from a government agency -- in this case the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office -- and twisted their meaning to suggest something never intended by the report's authors. Like I used to do, they misled the public with statistics to advance their team's ultimate agenda, which, of course, is to win votes in November. And if getting people to vote against their own best interests means making comments that not only are dishonest but also contradict what they've said previously, so be it.

I have to wonder if, also like my former me, they have trouble sleeping at night.

At issue is a section of the CBO's 10-year budget and economic outlook, which was released last Tuesday. The agency's economists updated their previous estimates that 800,000 fewer Americans might be working in 2017 because of the Affordable Care Act than would have been the case if Congress had not passed the law. The economists now believe that the number might actually be closer to 2 million and maybe 2.5 million by 2024.

The CBO never suggested that those jobs would be "lost" or that hundreds of thousands or millions of people would be laid off because of Obamacare. Rather, the law is expected to reduce the labor participation rate, meaning that many people will choose of their own free will not to stay in jobs because they need the health insurance.

Over the years, both Democrats and Republicans have pledged to support efforts to eliminate what has come to be known as "job lock," a phenomenon unique to the U.S. employer-based health insurance system. What "job lock" means is that people stay in jobs they often hate, usually at big corporations, out of fear that they might not be able to find affordable coverage if they quit, even to take a job at a smaller company.

For decades, big employers that provide health coverage in this country have had an advantage over smaller employers that can't afford to offer subsidized benefits. They've been able to attract workers who might prefer to work for a small business -- or start a business of their own -- but decide against it solely because of health insurance.

And in a system like ours in which millions of people every year lose their health insurance when they get laid off, big employers to a large extent have been the ultimate deciders when it comes to who will be able to keep their health insurance and who will lose it.

As a consequence, most of us with employer-based coverage have always been just one layoff away from joining the ranks of the uninsured. Millions of us join those ranks every year because our employers decide our services are no longer needed.

As Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the 2012 GOP vice-presidential nominee, said during the Congressional debate on health care reform in 2009, "the key question that ought to be addressed in any health care reform legislation, is are we going to continue job lock, or are we going to allow individuals more choice and portability to fit the 21st century workforce?"

The Affordable Care Act, by changing the health insurance marketplace to make it more consumer-friendly and a little less insurance company-friendly, essentially does exactly what Ryan said should be health reform's most important goal: it ends job lock.

But last week, after the CBO report was released, Ryan -- surprise! -- changed his tune. He suggested that Obamacare was encouraging people "not to get on the ladder of life, to begin working, getting the dignity of work, getting more opportunities, rising the income, joining the middle class."

Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina tweeted: "Obamacare will cost our nation about 2.5 million jobs and increase the deficit by $1 trillion."

The next day, CBO director Doug Elmendorf said in testimony before the House Budget Committee, which Ryan chairs, that Obamacare critics were misrepresenting the data.

"The reason we don't use the term 'lost jobs' is there is a critical difference between people who like to work and can't find a job -- or have a job that's lost for reasons beyond their control -- and people who choose not to work," he said.

Despite Elmendorf's clarification, and the Obama administration's efforts to set the record straight, we can expect the spin to continue. Don't be surprised to see campaign ads later this year saying that Obamacare will cost 2.5 million jobs, with the CBO cited as the source.

And you can expect millions of Americans to be influenced by the intentional misrepresentation of facts and figures during the next election. But don't expect those politicians purposely twisting the record to lose any sleep over it. Reported by Huffington Post 10 hours ago.

Instant Home Insurance Quote Tool Now Active for Homeowners at News Company Website

$
0
0
Instant home insurance quote tool is now activated for homeowner usage online at the Cherry News company. This immediate price tool is a complimentary system to produce 2014 rates.

Pittsburgh, PA (PRWEB) February 10, 2014

Protection plans that are offered by some insurance companies include repair and natural disaster coverage for homeowners. The Cherry News consumer website is promoting a new tool that is active for finding instant home insurance quote data from insurers at http://cherrynews.com/home-insurance.

Any property owner can gain access to the immediate quotes tool by entering their zip code that is attached to their property address. The entry of this information is to help match insurers offering localized rates instead of first searching national companies unable to compete with local agent prices.

"All home insurance plans that are promoted inside the finder system online are easy to research and compare between agencies to find the best possible pricing for homes of any size or value," said one CherryNews.com company source.

The policy providers that are underwriting the homeowner plans online provide different insurance payouts depending on the types of plans that are reviewed and quoted. The basic internal and external repair policies are included as well as disaster coverage that is usually an add-on by some insurers in the U.S.

"Property owners can begin reviewing rates after system entry from some of the top homeowner insurance agencies in the United States," the source said.

The Cherry News company is introducing its rates finder system for property owners to use to go along with the additional insurer information the system now provides. Aside from general property insurance, homeowners can view health insurance agencies to find 2014 rate quotes through the secondary automated tool at http://cherrynews.com/health-insurance.

Many of the insurers that are participating in the health coverage finder tool are part of exchanges that are now created to explore the different ranges in price for some health plans in the U.S. A mailing address zip code is also required when using the alternate matching system online.

About CherryNews.com

The CherryNews.com company supplies full support to consumers online who are researching retailer information or service provider details online. This company provides a public news portal that distributes information to the public through online content and research tools. The CherryNews.com company has designed and installed new systems for automated research this year online. Prices for insurance, home warranties and health programs are now provided online. The content that is distributed online is now in syndication through a variety of media agencies throughout North America. Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Obamacare and the Right-Wing Fight for Indentured Servitude

$
0
0
As Media Matters and other outlets noted last week, right-wing commentators drastically misrepresented a CBO report's findings about the Affordable Care Act. Fox News, Washington Post conservative blogger Jennifer Rubin, and many other conservative pundits misstated the report's optimistic conclusion -- that the equivalent of up to 2.5 million workers would eventually leave the workforce -- as instead claiming that 2.5 million jobs would be lost as a result of the law

But if these conservatives "misread" the report, as the Media Matters headline puts it, it was a telling error. While the ACA is flawed in some respects, the CBO report pointed to one of its strongest features: by at least partially uncoupling health care coverage from employment, it is unfettering workers from jobs they would prefer to leave. (The 2.5 million figure was also misinterpreted; the CBO discussed full-time equivalent workers, since some people will stay in the workforce but work fewer hours.)

What will these working people do with their newfound time? Some will retire. Others will presumably start their own businesses, raise their children, go back to school, or do any number of other things.

Whatever their new pursuits, they weren't free to pursue them before, especially if they were older or if they (or a family member) had a health problem. Their need for health insurance had forced them into a kind of indentured servitude, as a result of our country's unique (and uniquely problematic) employer-based health insurance system.

The CBO projected that 2.0 million people will take advantage of this new opportunity.  There are several reasons why this should be celebrated. First, it is (to use a popular conservative phrase) a "blow for freedom." A liberty-loving people should celebrate any development which gives its citizens greater freedom over their own lives. This nation rejected indentured servitude in its early days, and we should reject it again today.

Secondly, any development which will reduce the number of hours worked by 1.5 to 2.0 percent -- "almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor," in the CBO's words -- will increase the demand for available workers. To the extent that this change affects the larger workforce (as Michael Hiltzik's excellent analysis notes, that effect will be "muted" for most people), it would presumably be to drive up demand and therefore wages.

Could that be part of the Right's real problem with this report? That movement, which still uses the name "conservative," would be better described nowadays as "pro-corporatism." The party it supports, the GOP, is the "corporate agenda party." And if there's one thing these assembled forces routinely and consistently support, it's the return of "indentured servitude."

Few programs have done more to free Americans from that servitude than Social Security. It has allowed countless millions to retire with dignity, rather than sell apples on the street to survive. It has lifted millions of survivors and disabled Americans from poverty. And what does the Right think about Social Security?

They're against it.

Same goes for its sister program, Medicare, which they would reduce to a voucher system -- a system that can only be distinguished from the "Obamacare" they despise by the relative weakness of its subsidies, and the fact that it's much worse than the system now in place.

What about raising the minimum wage? It, too, would strengthen wages for the middle class. It would provide greater opportunities for social mobility among lower-income Americans. What does the right think about that idea?

They're against it.

College aid, so that Americans at all income levels have access to wage-increasing educational opportunities?

They're against it.

Banking reform, so that Americans encumbered by underwater loans can escape the bankers that cheated them and regain control of their own lives?

They're against it.

Whether it's a matter of political philosophy, or just a slavish devotion to the views pressed on them by think tankers, pundits, and the corporations who finance them, there's an underlying pattern to these policy positions. Each robs individuals and families of their freedoms: the freedom to choose their jobs, negotiate their salaries, or decide how they want to live.

Why, it's almost as if a movement which proclaims its devotion to individual freedom is actually promoting indentured servitude to its corporate backers.

Meanwhile, ACA supporters are celebrating articles like this one, which was headlined "They quit their jobs thanks to health care law." They should. That's a feature, not a bug, in this law. But the law's backers should not lose sight of the need to address that law's greatest flaw: while cost increases are slowing down, health insurance is very costly in this country. Even with subsidies, one of the couples profiled in the article will pay nearly $6,000 per year in premiums (for insurance which will still leave them with high out-of-pocket costs, relative to government-sponsored plans, should they need significant care).

In other words, we've cut some of the cords of indentured servitude. But the cost of our private-sector healthcare system is still an impediment to personal freedom. That's not how the Right will tell it, of course. But that's how it is.

In a telling phrase, the Post's Ms. Rubin laments those who would "spend a whole lot, tax a whole lot, make the cost of labor a whole lot more expensive, regulate insurance a whole lot more and create a lot of havoc."

A world with more and better-paying jobs, rebuilt roads and bridges, and insurance companies that are less able to gouge their customers won't sound like "havoc" to most Americans. In fact, that undoubtedly sounds pretty good to most people.

But then, most people don't believe in indentured servitude, either. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Murray says state health insurance website still not working; suggests ‘forensic teams’ to check on state child welfare agency

$
0
0
Senate President Therese Murray said today that despite the assurances of Governor Deval Patrick, many Massachusetts residents are still unable to use the state website designed to help them enroll in health insurance.
 
 
 
  Reported by Boston.com 8 hours ago.

White House delays health insurance mandate for medium-sized employers until 2016

$
0
0
The Obama administration announced Monday it would give medium-sized employers an extra year, until 2016, before they must offer health insurance to their full-time workers.

Firms with at least 100 employees will have to start offering this coverage in 2015. Reported by Washington Post 5 hours ago.

Glen Cove to vote on tightening retirement health care

$
0
0
The Glen Cove City Council is expected to vote Tuesday on raising the standard for employees to receive retirement health insurance coverage. Reported by Newsday 17 minutes ago.

SelectQuote Benefit Solutions Forms Comprehensive Partnership with GetInsured

$
0
0
Through GetInsured partnership, SQBS is adding health insurance as an option for employers, further expanding its benefits portfolio.

(PRWEB) February 11, 2014

As the insurance marketplace continues to evolve, employers are seeking coverage options that offer their workforce quality and flexibility among insurance plans. Through a partnership with GetInsured, SelectQuote Benefit Solutions has added health insurance for pre-65 individuals to their employer benefits portfolio. The integrated partnership allows households to manage their health insurance benefits, for both pre- and post-65 individuals, through one comprehensive exchange platform.

The private exchange marketplace offered by SelectQuote Benefit Solutions and GetInsured allows employees and retirees a broader range of choices, offers plan savings and allows both pre- and post-65 health care coverage independent of the employer. This approach reduces the overall cost of benefits to companies and organizations and boosts their bottom lines.

“Expanding our coverage options beyond the post-65 coverage offered through SelectQuote Senior aligns with our mission to offer customers choice as they shop for insurance,” said Tom Grant, President of SelectQuote Senior. “Through our partnership with GetInsured, we can accommodate retiree insurance coverage at all ages.”

SelectQuote’s pre-65 exchange, offered through GetInsured, is an ACA-compliant health insurance marketplace that enables plan participants to easily compare and enroll in affordable health care plans. Together, SelectQuote and GetInsured offer trusted, comprehensive solutions for employees, retirees and their families.

“We’re proud to partner with SelectQuote Benefit Solutions to offer employers and their retirees the most competitive and comprehensive insurance options available,” said Scott Osler, GetInsured Vice President of Business Development.

About SelectQuote Benefit Solutions: SelectQuote was founded in 1985 and has been an innovative and established leader in building and operating insurance exchanges for auto & home, term life and Medicare insurance products. Through its insurance exchanges, SelectQuote offers voluntary benefit programs that provide substantial cost savings to corporations, public sector employers, unions, associations and their employees, members or retirees. SelectQuote has delivered business solutions to companies and organizations resulting in more than 140,000 policies annually and 800,000 active customers. For more information visit SelectQuote Benefit Solutions online or connect via LinkedIn, Facebook or Twitter.

About GetInsured: GetInsured is a leading health insurance technology company that combines modern technology and customer service capabilities to make health insurance shopping easy and efficient. Since its founding in 2005, GetInsured has helped millions of individuals and families find the right health insurance plan for their needs and budgets. GetInsured is approved by the federal government to enroll Americans in subsidized health insurance plans, and the company also provides state governments with technology solutions for the enablement of state-based health insurance exchanges. For more information, please visit http://www.getinsured.com.

### Reported by PRWeb 17 hours ago.

IPA Family Announces the Return of Top Producer Jeannette Leon

$
0
0
IPA welcomes Leon back as insurance advisor with new Obamacare certification.

Tampa, FL (PRWEB) February 11, 2014

IPA Family, LLC (IPA) announced the return of one of its top insurance producers, Jeannette Leon, to its organization. Leon has been a licensed health insurance advisor for more than eight years and has flourished in the health and life industry.

As the health insurance industry began to change in the face of the Obamacare-era, many insurance companies began to alter their business models. When this shift started, Jeannette felt she could earn a more lucrative income as an insurance advisor for a larger marketplace. To her surprise, she encountered some disadvantages.

“The grass wasn’t as green on the other side. Brokers contracted with other companies may earn a little more money on advances, but I didn’t have the same team of support, the family aspect of looking out for each other was missing, and I wasn’t provided the same training opportunities that I had with IPA,” said Leon.

She returns with new certification that will help her assist clients shopping both on and off the Obamacare exchanges. Through the Department of Health and Human Services, Leon sought education and training on the federal health care marketplace and became a certified insurance advisor. Her desire to help clients make the best choices drove this decision. Now, she is equipped to once again offer her services to IPA Family clients as well as new prospects that have entered the marketplace during the open-enrollment period.

Leon is not coming back alone. Inspired by their mother and her experiences in the industry and with IPA Family, her children Ashley and Kevin Leon are also joining the organization.

“I’m honored to join a company that welcomes me and is so willing to work with someone who is in the early stages of learning about the industry,” said Kevin. “Although I set appointments for my mother for many years, I am excited to now have my own business to help others like she has.”

Leon has historically been in the top ten for IPA sales in the country, and together the family is looking forward to rebuilding this level of excellence in their local community. An office in the Bradenton / Sarasota area will open soon, and announcements will follow with location and career opportunities.

If you live in the Bradenton / Sarasota area and need health or life insurance advising or want more information on the Affordable Care Act and how it will affect you and your family or your business, contact Leon at 407-929-5815 or visit her HealtheDeals website.

In the state of Florida, IPA’s Centers of Excellence are located in Tampa, St. Petersburg Brandon, Bradenton, Cape Coral, Clearwater. Englewood, Ft. Meyers, Lakeland, Naples, Parish, Riverview, Sarasota, Venice, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami, South Florida, and surrounding areas.

About IPA Family, LLC (IPA)
IPA Family, LLC, a member of The IHC Group, is a national marketing organization that distributes major medical insurance plans and other health insurance plans and consumer benefit association membership programs across the nation. IPA’s trained professional sales associates, referred to as the “IPA Family,” provides information and a product portfolio that can meet the needs of most small business owners and self-employed individuals and families. Headquartered in Tampa, Florida., IPA has an excellent reputation as an accredited organization with the Better Business Bureau (bbb.org).

About The IHC Group
The IHC Group is an organization of insurance carriers and marketing and administrative affiliates that has been providing life, health, disability, medical stop-loss and specialty insurance solutions to groups and individuals for over 30 years. Members of The IHC Group include Independence Holding Company, American Independence Corp., Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York, Madison National Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Independence American Insurance Company. Each insurance carrier in The IHC Group has a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) from A.M. Best Company, Inc., a widely recognized rating agency that rates insurance companies on their relative financial strength and ability to meet policyholder obligations. (An A++ rating from A.M. Best is its highest rating.) Collectively, the companies in The IHC Group provide insurance coverage to more than one million individuals and groups.

We encourage you to visit us on the following social media sites:
Facebook: Simply search IPA Family
YouTube: TheIPAFamily
Twitter: Subscribe to us @IPA_Family Reported by PRWeb 16 hours ago.

Zane Benefits Reports Small Businesses Rush to Set Up Defined Contribution Health Plans for 2014

$
0
0
Small Businesses Implement Defined Contribution Health Plans to Reduce Healthcare Costs in 2014

Park City, Utah (PRWEB) February 11, 2014

Today, Zane Benefits, the #1 Online Health Benefits Solution, reports that small businesses are rushing to establish Defined Contribution Health Plans for 2014. This rush comes as small businesses see the opportunity for cost savings and better health benefits in 2014.

According to Zane Benefits' website, group health insurance is broken for small businesses and their employees. The cost of premiums is unsustainable and a one-size-fits-all plan does not meet the diverse health needs of employees.

That's where Zane Benefits says new strategies, such as Defined Contribution Health Plans, come into play.

According to Rick Lindquist, President of Zane Benefits, "We are seeing an enormous uptick in the number of Defined Contribution Health Plan requests as small businesses see the value of individual health insurance and a Pure Defined Contribution approach. Our ZaneHealth solution allows a business to create the plan in less than 15 minutes online. Zero paperwork is required."

ZaneHealth is a cloud-based administration platform that allows employers to give select employees monthly allowances to spend on their own individual health insurance. With ZaneHealth, employers set aside a certain sum every month, say $200, that employees spend on their own health insurance policy in a state health insurance exchange or through a broker.

Click here to read the full article.

About Zane Benefits
Zane Benefits, the #1 Online Health Benefits Solution, was founded in 2006 to revolutionize the way employers provide employee health benefits in America. We empower employees to take control over their own healthcare, while helping employers recruit and retain the best talent. Our online solutions allow small and medium-sized businesses to successfully transition to a health benefits program that creates happier employees, reduces costs and frees up more time to serve their customers. For more information about ZaneHealth, visit http://www.zanebenefits.com. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

Health First Insurance Welcomes Over 1,400 New Individual Members in 2014

$
0
0
Health First Insurance welcomes more than 1,400 new individual members from Brevard and Indian River Counties in 2014. More than 900 of the new members came in through the federally-facilitated health insurance marketplace via http://www.healthcare.gov.

Rockledge, FL (PRWEB) February 11, 2014

Health First Insurance Welcomes Over 1,400 New Individual Members in 2014

Average Age of Insured has Increased from 37 to 48

Health First Insurance welcomes more than 1,400 new Individual members from Brevard and Indian River Counties in 2014. More than 900 of the new members came in through the federally-facilitated Health Insurance Marketplace via http://www.healthcare.gov.

"A notable shift in this new enrollment is that the average age of our individual members has increased from 37 in 2013 to 48 in 2014," said Health First Health Plans President & CEO Ed Griese. "For many over the age of 50, rates have decreased within the Affordable Care Act (ACA), making it more attractive. We expected the average age to be increase by approximately ten years and we are definitely seeing this dynamic play out in the Space Coast market."

Many experts have recently pointed out that early retirees could see the biggest changes with the implementation of the ACA. That’s because in the new individual market, insurers are utilizing a community rating approach without regard to people’s health status and gender when setting premium rates.

Griese said, "As an integrated delivery network, Health First is positioned to serve the local community with a unique approach. With an expanded access to gym memberships and the full network of providers included with all plans, individuals and families applying on the Marketplace have a comprehensive solution with Health First Individual."

Additional interesting facts are as follows:· 72% of the new 2014 enrollment came from the Marketplace (http://www.healthcare.gov)
· 61% of those applying on the Marketplace received some level of premium subsidy
· 72% of the Marketplace enrollment selected a Silver plan
· 60% of the Marketplace enrollment was between 51-64 years of age
· 17% of the enrollment was under the age of 30

To learn more about Health First Individual plans on and off of the Marketplace, visit http://www.HealthFirstIndividual.org or call 877-904-4914.

About Health First

Founded in 1995, Health First, an integrated delivery, employs more than 7,500 people and has four hospitals (including Holmes Regional Medical Center, Palm Bay Hospital, Cape Canaveral Hospital and Viera Hospital). Health First Health Plans also offers a wide variety of health insurance plan options for Brevard and Indian River Counties. In addition, Health First is home to Brevard County’s only Trauma Center. Health First Medical Group is the largest multi-specialty physician group on the Space Coast. Health First offers numerous outpatient and wellness services, including four Pro-Health and Fitness Centers. Visit http://www.Health-First.org for more information. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

Valentine's Day Inspired Pet Names

$
0
0
Veterinary Pet Insurance Analyzes Its Database to Find Romance-Inspired Monikers

Brea, CA (PRWEB) February 11, 2014

In honor of Valentine’s Day, Veterinary Pet Insurance Co. (VPI), the nation’s first and largest provider of pet health insurance, analyzed its database of more than 500,000 insured pets to find out how many pet owners opted for a romantic theme when naming their furry friend.

Below is VPI’s list of the top 10 most common romance-inspired names from its database of more than half million pet names (total number of pets sharing that name in parenthesis):

Top 10 Romance-Inspired Pet Names

1.    Angel (1,120)
2.    Beau (687)
3.    Honey (586)
4.    Sugar (546)
5.    Candy (202)
6.    Rose (187)
7.    Sweetie (185)
8.    Snuggles (147)
9.    Cuddles (136)
10.    Babe (99)

Romantic names worthy of honorable mention are “Valentine” (52 pets), “Lovey” (50 pets) and “Cupid” (35 pets). Among the less popular, but more quirky romance-inspired pet names in the VPI database are “Fluffy Snow Angel,” “Lady V Sweet Coco Love” and “Misses Kisses.” To view some of the most creative monikers selected for VPI’s Top 10 Most Unusual Pet Names of 2013, visit http://www.wackypetnames.com.

About Veterinary Pet Insurance
With more than 500,000 pets insured nationwide, Veterinary Pet Insurance Co./DVM Insurance Agency (VPI) is a member of the Nationwide Insurance family of companies and is the first and largest pet health insurance company in the United States. Since 1982, VPI has helped provide pet owners with peace of mind and is committed to being the trusted choice of America’s pet lovers.

VPI Pet Insurance plans cover dogs, cats, birds and exotic pets for multiple medical problems and conditions relating to accidents, illnesses and injuries. CareGuard® coverage for routine care is available for an additional premium. Medical plans are available in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, one in three Fortune 500 companies offers VPI Pet Insurance as an employee benefit. Policies are offered and administered by Veterinary Pet Insurance Company in California and DVM Insurance Agency in all other states. Underwritten by Veterinary Pet Insurance Company (CA), Brea, CA, an A.M. Best A rated company (2012); National Casualty Company (all other states), Madison, WI, an A.M. Best A+ rated company (2012). Pet owners can find VPI Pet Insurance on Facebook or follow @VPI on Twitter. For more information about VPI Pet Insurance, call 800-USA-PETS (800-872-7387) or visit petinsurance.com. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

A.M. Best Assigns Ratings to National Health Insurance Company

$
0
0
A.M. Best Assigns Ratings to National Health Insurance Company OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A.M. Best Co. has assigned a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) and an issuer credit rating of “a-” to National Health Insurance Company (NHIC) (Bedford, TX). The outlook assigned to both ratings is stable. The ratings reflect the explicit support provided by National General Holdings Corp.’s (National General) subsidiary, Integon National Insurance Company (INIC), in the form of an intercompany reinsurance pooling agreement that was executed following r Reported by Business Wire 12 hours ago.

WaPo Fact Checker Gives Dick Durbin's Obamacare Claims Four Pinocchios

$
0
0
WaPo Fact Checker Gives Dick Durbin's Obamacare Claims Four Pinocchios During Sunday's Meet the Press, Illinois Democrat Senator Dick Durbin made the wild claim that ten million new Americans have found insurance coverage thanks to Obamacare. He also claimed that Obamacare would lower the deficit. But even The Washington Post fact checker had to give Durbin's spin its worst rating of four Pinocchios.

As the Sunday, February 5th discussion shifted to health care, host Bob Schieffer pointed out that Obamacare is still confusing nearly everyone, and he asked Senator Durbin if there is "any hope of getting it straightened out."

Durbin kicked into high spin with his answer.

"Bob, let’s look at the bottom line," Durbin said. "The bottom line is this. Ten million Americans have health insurance today who would not have had it without the Affordable Care Act--10 million."

That wasn't all the spin Durbin had to offer: "And we can also say this. It is going to reduce the deficit more than we thought it would. We were seeing a decline in the growth of the cost of health care, exactly our goal in passing this original legislation. I’m finding people, as I go across Illinois, who, for the first time in their lives, have an opportunity for affordable health insurance for their families.

"Now, there are many Republicans who are wishing that this fails, hoping they can find any shred of evidence against it," he claimed. "But we had a bad rollout. Let’s concede that point. Since then, we are gaining steam. And I think, ultimately, we’re going to find you can’t go back. You have to extend the health insurance protection to the 25 million, 30 million Americans who will ultimately have it, and we’ll be a better nation for it.

All of this is simply untrue.

To start with, the recent CBO report did not in any way say that Obamacare would bring down the deficit. On the contrary, the report said that the deficit will rise uncontrollably after 2015.

As to the millions Durbin claimed have gotten new healthcare coverage, the Post fact checker noted, "Durbin appears to be combining two figures released by the administration," and neither number is true.

The paper pointed out that the number pushed by the White House, that 6.3 million have gotten new insurance under Obamacare, is impossible to substantiate because there is no way to know if those who tried to sign up actually got an insurance policy and began paying premiums. The White House is making claims that it simply cannot prove, and Durbin parroted these empty claims.

The paper went on to state that about all one can say is that the number of people who signed up and got new health insurance is no more than 4 million, and even that estimate is "extraordinarily generous."

Finally, the Post criticized Durbin, stating he "has little excuse for going on national television and claiming that every one of these people had been previously uninsured. This has now become a Four Pinocchio violation."

Senator Durbin, however, is undaunted in his outlandish claims. After The Washington Post published its fact check, his office replied to the criticism:

Fact check after fact check has confirmed that more than 9 million Americans have signed up for private health insurance or Medicaid coverage through Affordable Care Act. Many of the more than 9 million Americans are being covered for the first time. No matter the number of new enrollees, there is no question that the law is working and millions of people are realizing the benefits of affordable health coverage and the protections it guarantees.

In reply, the paper noted that it is "unaware of any fact checks that have confirmed these figures as all ACA enrollments or evidence that 'many' of the enrollees are being covered for the first time."

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 11 hours ago.

Illinois Taps The Onion To Sell Obamacare

$
0
0
Illinois Taps The Onion To Sell Obamacare While we realize that newsflow over the past few years has taken a decided turn for the surreal, we are sad (or, alternatively, delighted) to announce that we are dead serious when we report *that Illinois governor Pat Quinn has now tapped The Onion - that would be the famous satiric website - to sell Obamacare. *Perhaps we should not be surprised: after we previously revealed that The Onion served as the mystery source of economic insight by such intellectual economist titans as Paul Krugman and Larry Summers, the time may have come come to surrender to the great wave of absurdity that has washed over this nation, and admit that when it comes to pitching idiotic policies, self-referential satire may be the only option left in the arsenal of the central planners.

Acording to Crains Chicago, Gov. Pat Quinn is partnering with the Onion *to persuade young invincibles” to sign up for health care insurance — before it's too late under Obamacare.*

More on this surreal development from the source:



Beginning today, Onion Labs, the creative services division of Chicago-based Onion, *will run banners ads on its website of a man forced to sell his action figures to pay his medical bills because he didn't buy health insurance*, according to a statement today from Get Covered Illinois, the state's health insurance exchange.

 

 

So-called young invincibles, healthy people in their 20s and 30s, are crucial to balancing out the costly sick and elderly people buying plans on the Illinois health insurance exchange.

 

*“We know that to effectively reach Young Invincibles — who are 53 percent of our uninsured residents in Illinois — we have to work with non-traditional, and especially digital, sources for news and entertainment," Jennifer Koehler, executive director of Get Covered Illinois, said in statement. "That's where the Onion fits right into our outreach strategy.”*

 

The Onion also will create a video, an editorial and a customer “news” section about Get Covered Illinois that will appear online as the March 31 deadline to buy health insurance approaches.

 

“This is a great opportunity for Onion Labs to work with Get Covered Illinois, and do what the Onion does best — *create irreverent-yet-relevant comedy and put it to work for an organization that wants to reach millennials,” *Onion CEO Steve Hannah said in the statement.



Actually what the Onion does best is to capture the idiocy of people through the lens of stires. In this case, it has most certainly succeeded. Reported by Zero Hedge 9 hours ago.

In Illinois Deal, The Onion Will Promote Health Insurance (Really)

$
0
0
Get Covered Illinois, the state's health insurance exchange, has hired Onion Labs, The Onion's in-house ad team, to develop banner ads, a video and other online material to persuade young people to sign up for insurance coverage. Reported by NPR 6 hours ago.

Expanded Medicaid would have given 239,000 Louisianians health insurance

$
0
0
At least 239,000 more people in Louisiana would have had access to health insurance if Gov. Bobby Jindal and state legislators had chosen to accept new federal funding for the Medicaid program this year, according a recent report by a... Reported by nola.com 5 hours ago.

The Good Jobs News on the Affordable Care Act

$
0
0
Leading Republicans, along with much of the media, went into a frenzy last week following the release of a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report assessed the likely impact of the ACA on employment and concluded it will lead to a reduction in the total number of hours worked by 1.5-2.0 percent when its effects are fully felt later in the decade.

This reduction in hours is equivalent to 2.0-2.5 million fewer people working. This was quickly translated into a loss of 2.0-2.5 million jobs, which made Obamacare officially a jobs-killer in the eyes of the CBO. That's pretty powerful stuff, but it turns reality on its head.

The CBO assessment was that because people could now get access to health insurance through the exchanges rather than having to get insurance through their jobs, many people might decide not to work or to work fewer hours. This voluntary reduction in work hours is one of the goals of Obamacare, it is not an unforeseen consequence.

There are millions of people who struggle at their jobs with serious health conditions in the hope of reaching age 65 when they can qualify for Medicare. The exchanges will make it possible for many of these people to get insurance at prices they can afford, since insurers are not allowed to discriminate based on pre-existing conditions. As a result, some of these older workers will opt to either retire or to possible work fewer hours at a job that doesn't provide insurance. Giving people this option was one of the main goals of health care reform.

Similarly, there are many workers with young children who would like to be able to either take time off from work to spend with their kids, or alternatively to work at a job part-time. However they may not have this option if their only way to afford insurance is by working at a full-time job. As a result of the ACA these people will work fewer hours.

This also was also one of the goals of Obamacare. Advocates of health care reform thought it would be good if the parents of young children had the opportunity to work less to be with their kids, if that is what they choose to do.

When CBO did its analysis and said that Obamacare would lead to some reduction in work hours, it was saying the ACA would have its intended effect. It was freeing people from health care related job-lock. This is a feature, not a bug.

It's remarkable that so many people could have reached the direct opposite conclusion. Of course almost any measure that protects workers will have some negative impact on people's willingness to work. If we eliminated Medicare and made older people pay for their health care then we could get more people to work into their 70s, 80s, even 90s. Wouldn't that be great?

In fact, the withdrawal of people from the labor market would likely have a positive effect on those who want to work. At a time where we still have millions of people unemployed or underemployed, the people who retire or cut back hours to be with kids will be opening up jobs for younger workers unable to find work or full-time jobs. Since we have a Congress that is unwilling to take the steps to increase demand in the labor market, the best way we may have of increasing job openings is by reducing supply.

The reduction in labor supply is also likely to have a positive impact on wages. In fact, the CBO numbers implied that wages would on average increase as a result of the ACA. While it projected hours worked would fall by between 1.5-2.0 percent, it expects that compensation will only fall by 1.0 percent. This implies an increase of 0.5-1.0 percent in average hourly compensation.

Part of this rise in compensation could be a composition effect. If we take the lowest paid workers out of the labor market, then average wages of those remaining will rise. However part of the story is simple supply and demand, if we reduce the supply of labor because more people choose not to work, then we would expect the price of labor to rise. That is the sort of story we should expect to see as a result of the ACA.

So the takeaway from the CBO report is overwhelmingly positive. People who had been locked into jobs because it was the only way they could get health insurance will no longer have to work as much. This will open up jobs for other workers and lead to somewhat higher pay in general. The only people it's bad for are those who have made a political career out of opposing Obamacare and those who want cheap help. Reported by Huffington Post 2 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images