Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Everyone Will Be Covered (Except For 24 Million)

$
0
0
Today was the first reality-check for the Republican goal of health insurance reform since the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was passed. The breathtaking numbers from the Congressional Budget Office just proved what many of us have been saying all along ― this is the first time in the past seven years that Republicans have tried to bring an actual piece of legislation to the floors of Congress for a very good reason. The numbers just don’t quite add up the way the GOP has long wished they would. By never writing an actual bill before now, they avoided letting the public in on this crucial bit of information. But now it was “put up or shut up” time, so Republicans were forced to come up with an actual bill. And the C.B.O. just confirmed what Democrats have been saying for a long time ― replacing Obamacare is going to throw millions of Americans off health insurance.

Donald Trump’s insistence that “everyone will be covered” has now been proven to be a gigantic lie. Everyone will be covered, except for the 24 million who will lose coverage in the next ten years (starting with 14 million who will lose it next year alone). The number of uninsured Americans will skyrocket from the current 27 million to over 50 million. This won’t be because (according to Paul Ryan) they never really wanted health insurance in the first place and would now use their expanded “freedom” to refuse to pay for it ― it will instead be because tens of millions of people will not be able to afford insurance. This was always going to be the reality under a Republican revamp of Obamacare, but now that the C.B.O. has finally been given a chance to run numbers on an actual bill, we can all see just how drastic this is going to be for millions of American families.

Last week, while Paul Ryan was attempting to hustle the bill as far as he could as fast as he could (even holding votes on it at 4:30 A.M.), independent analysts were already predicting that millions would lose their insurance. These estimates ranged from a low of about six or seven million up to 15 million. What we now know is that they were actually far too generous in their assumptions. The 24 million figure is so staggeringly larger than anyone expected that it will instantly change the political debate. Even before the C.B.O. numbers came out, there were few Republicans (outside of the White House and Paul Ryan’s office) who were vocally supporting the bill in public. How many of them are now going to make the case that 24 million more uninsured Americans is a good thing?


On the campaign trail, Trump was free to boast about the paradise he was going to create in the health insurance industry, and his voters lapped it up.

As is true for many issues, Donald Trump wasn’t outside the Republican mainstream in his comments on how wonderful GOP health insurance reform would look like. He may have been more direct, but the things he was saying were pretty close to what Republicans had been saying for a long time ― that their Obamacare replacement would cover more people, bring everyone’s costs down, and give better results at the end of the day. Trump just put the icing on that cake, he didn’t bake it himself, in other words.

Trump, of course, had no actual plan himself, even while loudly insisting that he did. He felt free to expound on how big and beautiful his non-existent plan was going to be, because he intrinsically trusts his own brain to solve any problem no matter how intractable. Turns out he was not only fooling the voters, he was also fooling himself. He even admitted so about a week ago, complaining that health reform was a lot harder than anyone could have ever guessed. “Anyone” except, you know, for pretty much every person inside Congress, just to name 535.

On the campaign trail, Trump was free to boast about the paradise he was going to create in the health insurance industry, and his voters lapped it up. But, tellingly, after he was sworn in as president, no Trumpcare plan appeared. He put off inquiries by moving the goalposts a bit, saying his beautiful reform plan would be announced the day his nominee to head the Health and Human Services department was confirmed by the Senate. This has now happened, but there is still no Trumpcare plan. When Paul Ryan finally unveiled his own plan, Trump quickly embraced it ― but that is not the same thing as coming up with a plan on his own. Few, so far, have even noticed this contradiction.

By tying his wagon to Ryan’s plan, Trump (like the rest of the GOP) has been forced into defending reality, rather than just painting visual castles in the air. And the reality is (quite obviously) going to fall far short of Trump’s promises. Democrats are already gleefully recycling all of Trump’s grandiose promises into talking points of their own, and this could indeed continue all the way to the 2018 midterm elections. As well it should. It’s too good a political opportunity to miss, really. All Democrats have to do is run a clip of Trump saying “everyone will be covered” next to the C.B.O. numbers. Or point out the many times Trump pledged not to touch Medicare and Medicaid, together with the reality of Ryan’s plan to dismantle as much of Medicaid as he thinks he can get away with. Also buried in the C.B.O. numbers is the fact that the price of insurance is going to immediately head upward ― 15 to 20 percent more than under Obamacare. There’s another easy ad for Democrats to make.


By tying his wagon to Ryan’s plan, Trump (like the rest of the GOP) has been forced into defending reality, rather than just painting visual castles in the air.

Twenty-four million people is a lot, to state the obvious. It is such a large fraction of the American populace that few people will not personally know someone directly (and negatively) affected by Ryan’s bill. This is what happens when you simultaneously allow insurers to charge a lot more money while drastically shrinking the subsidies available. It’s pretty basic math, and it will even affect Trump voters disproportionately to the public at large.

Ryan and any other Republicans who rally around his plan are going to have a tough sell in the weeks to come. They can try to discredit the C.B.O. report all they want, but while that might have worked if the number was a lot lower (say, six million), it’s going to be pretty hard to convince anyone that 24 million uninsured Americans is just “some sort of rounding error.”

Ironically, the only good news for Ryan out of the C.B.O. report is that he might now have an easier time convincing the Tea Partiers in his own ranks to vote for the bill. Their main argument has been that the bill is far too generous ― it didn’t kick enough people off health insurance, in other words. With the staggering 24 million figure now out, perhaps some of them can now be convinced that the bill actually is Draconian enough for them to support.

But it’s certainly not going to help Ryan with the moderate Republicans (especially those in the Senate). Paul Ryan’s initial scheme was to get the bill through both houses of Congress and on the president’s desk so fast that public opinion wouldn’t have time to react. The original schedule Ryan wanted was to pass the bill before the next big congressional vacation period, when they all go home to get an earful from their constituents. This aggressive schedule was never very realistic, but now it looks downright fantastical. Which means we’ll have time for some town hall outrage, in the meantime. Because my guess is that a fair portion of the 24 million people who will be affected are going to speak up to their congressional representatives, quite loudly and unequivocally. Which was precisely what Ryan was trying to avoid. The problem all along has been that castles in the air are a lot easier to defend out on the campaign trail, but when actual bills are drawn up they get scored by the C.B.O. Now we can all see precisely what Ryan (and all the rest of the Republicans) have been trying to hide for the past seven years ― they are truly on a mission to throw tens of millions of people off their health insurance. Obamacare so offends their ideological concept of the world that they simply don’t care if 24 million Americans again face bankruptcy whenever they get sick. No wonder they haven’t written an actual bill before now, because now everyone can see exactly what they stand for ― and it’s not a pretty picture.

 

Chris Weigant blogs at:

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 4 hours ago.

CBO says 14 million to lose insurance by 2018

$
0
0
The Congressional Budget Office released its projection for the Republicans' health care plan on Monday, revealing that while the plan would cut about $337 billion from the budget deficit through 2026, it would also lead to 24 million fewer people having health insurance. - REUTERS Reported by Bangkok Post 4 hours ago.

GOP Health Bill Could Let Companies Pressure Workers To Give Genetic Test Results

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― Imagine your employer wants you to submit to genetic testing as part of a “workplace wellness” program. The testing is completely voluntary, your employer says. If you’re concerned about your privacy, no one can force you to take part.

There’s just one catch: Declining to provide genetic testing results will cost you thousands of dollars each year in higher health insurance premiums. In that case, how voluntary would the program feel?

Such a futuristic-seeming scenario may not be far off if a proposal moving through the GOP-controlled House becomes law. A Republican bill that made it out of committee last week would enable companies to withhold financial benefits from employees who don’t take part in genetic testing as part of a workplace wellness program.

The committee measure passed, 22-17, on a party-line vote with all Democrats opposed. There is no equivalent bill yet in the Republican-controlled Senate, but such a proposal could become part of the health care overhaul now consuming Capitol Hill as Republicans try to repeal and “replace” the Affordable Care Act.

If it finds its way into health care reform, the measure would provide employers with a carve-out from nondiscrimination and privacy laws when it comes to workplace wellness programs. Under current law, genetic testing can be part of a wellness program, but an employer can’t make it a condition of benefits.

The GOP measure would allow that. It doesn’t mean your employer could force you to undergo such testing and share the results ― but your employer could essentially withhold money if you don’t. 

Dozens of health and privacy advocacy groups have come out against the bill.

The risk of disclosure can extend beyond the worker’s health. In one case cited by the Labor Department, a job candidate was rejected after disclosing screening results that showed he carried a single genetic mutation for Gaucher’s disease, which meant only that he could pass the mutation on to a son. 

A spokeswoman for Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), chairwoman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, said the bill would not change the fact that employees could choose whether or not to participate in such a program.

“Those who are opposed to the bill are spreading false information in a desperate attempt to deny employees the choice to participate in a voluntary program that can reduce health insurance costs and encourage healthy lifestyle choices,” she said. “We believe working families should be empowered with that choice, and so did the Obama administration. It is another sad reminder of just how extreme the Democrat Party and their liberal allies are becoming.”

As The Huffington Post’s Jonathan Cohn has reported, workplace wellness programs have become a popular way for companies to try to save money on employee health care costs. In a typical program, a worker might provide her employer with a basic health screening ― cholesterol level, body-mass index ― as well as a rundown of her habits ― how much she exercises, whether she smokes, etc. In some cases, an employee might even agree to losing a certain amount of weight or hitting a blood pressure target.

The idea behind those programs is to nudge employees toward a healthier lifestyle and prevent them from getting sick; that, in turn, would keep employers’ insurance costs down. In return for taking part, the employee gets anything from a small gift card to thousands of dollars in health care savings a year. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey, 83 percent of large employers offered wellness programs last year, and 42 percent of them came with financial incentives. Most programs had a maximum reward of a few hundred bucks.  

Setting aside whether or not these programs actually work, the money at stake raises the question of how voluntary they are. So far, the law has come clearly down on the side of businesses. Under President Barack Obama, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission set rules allowing companies to dangle incentives worth 30 percent of a worker’s insurance premium, deeming such arrangements voluntary.

The implications of the bill were first reported by Stat reporter Sharon Begley. Jennifer Mathis, director of policy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law in Washington, D.C., told Begley that the bill would “completely take away the protections of existing laws” ― namely, the genetic information protections in the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

The language of the new bill states that workplace wellness programs “shall be considered to be in compliance” with the relevant provisions of those laws.

“While the information returned to employers would not include workers’ names,” Begley noted, “it’s not difficult, especially in a small company, to match a genetic profile with the individual.” Such arrangements would also put test results in the hands of the third-party firms that operate the wellness programs.

House Republicans said the change would give employers “the legal certainty they need” to implement workplace wellness programs. They have dubbed the bill the “Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act.”

Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, the committee’s ranking Democrat, told HuffPost in a statement that the Republican bill would “coerce” workers into forking over sensitive medical and genetic information to their employers, “undermining key workplace civil rights.”

“This is yet another policy proposal that will disproportionately harm sicker and older people, as well as those who have disabilities that may not be readily noticeable,” Scott said. “Information disclosed in these programs could also result in discrimination in employment.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

3/13: Tens of millions to lose coverage under GOP health plan; Heavy California rains lead to desert "superbloom"

$
0
0
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says the GOP alternative to Obamacare would cost 14 million people their health insurance in 2018 and millions more thereafter; After a winter of heavy rains soaked California, ending a six-year drought, a floral rainbow has bloomed in the desert. Reported by CBS News 5 hours ago.

WATCH: Rachel Maddow shows what 28 million Americans losing health insurance would look like – in 2 minutes

$
0
0
Reacting to a U.S. Congressional Budget Office report forecasting 14 million more people would be uninsured in 2018 and 24 million more in 2026 if the current GOP health care replacement plan is approved, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow provided a useful visual example of what they would look like. “... Reported by Raw Story 4 hours ago.

Ralph Nader: ‘Making America Great’ At Americans’ Expense – OpEd

$
0
0
Donald J. Trump was a builder of casinos and high-priced hotels and golf courses. Now he is a builder of a tower of contradictions for the American people that is making “America Great” at  their expense.

He  made many conflicting promises throughout his presidential campaign. He was going to be the “voice of the people.” He was going to make their safety and their job expansion his number one priority. He was going to make sure that everybody had health insurance under his then unannounced plan. He was going to deregulate businesses, cut taxes, increase the military budget, build and repair the country’s public infrastructure and not surge the deficit. He was going to scrap the trade agreements known as NAFTA and the WTO.

Now in the White House, he proceeds to push programs and policies that contradict many of his promises. He is ballooning an already massive, bloated military budget by cutting the health and safety budgets of consumer, environmental and labor regulatory agencies and housing and energy assistance. Reportedly he wants to cut one billion dollars out of the budget of the Centers for Disease Control that works to detect and prevent global epidemics! Just today, the Congressional Budget Office announced that under the proposed Republican Health Plan, 24 million people will lose health care by 2026. Apparently he is oblivious to the perils of Avian Flu, SARS, Ebola and Zika threatening our national security and the health and lives of millions of people.

There is more to this emerging betrayal. Trump is supporting Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan’s “you’re on your own, folks” devastating health insurance plan. Slash and burn Ryan, comfortably fully insured by the taxpayers, publicly admits he doesn’t know how many people will lose their health insurance. Imagine the impact of strip-mining Medicaid on the poor – nearly 70 million, including many children, are on that program. Runaway Ryan even fantasizes over going after Medicare next and corporatize it.

Republicans such as Mick Mulvaney, the new director of Trump’s Office of Management and Budget, argue that these measures are necessary for “efficiency.” Yet neither Trump, nor Mulvaney, nor Ryan, nor Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have ever gone after $60 billion in business fraud on Medicare each year. The Congressional Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) reports ten percent of all health care spending is drained away by computer billing fraud and abuse.=That would be about $340 billion this year alone – an estimate considered rock bottom by the nation’s leading expert on health care billing fraud – Professor Malcolm Sparrow of Harvard University!

It gets nuttier. Trump wants to increase the budget of the sprawling Department of Homeland Security but cut the budget of the US Coast Guard (which is part of the Department) and whose budget is already strapped in safeguarding our coastlines (See David Helvarg’s engrossing book, Rescue Warriors, which describes the Coast Guard’s often unsung missions).

Trump seems unwilling to oppose the more extreme “mad dogs” among the Congressional Republicans who want to erase the budgets for legal services for the poor (150 corporate law firms last week signed a letter saying they support maintaining the budget for legal services for the poor), public broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities. The total number of dollars for all these programs is about $1 billion annually,  or one thirteenth the cost of another redundant air craft carrier (we already have twelve in service—more active service carriers than the rest of the world combined).

Moreover, this self-touted “voice of the people” is instead placing in the highest government positions the “voices” of Wall Street billionaires. Next door to his Oval Office is Gary Cohn, former Goldman Sachs boss, a supposedly smart man who just mimicked Trump by absurdly claiming “we have no alternative but to reinvest in our military and make ourselves a military power once again.” Who in the world doesn’t think US Empire, bristling with arrays of weapons of mass destruction and able to immediately destroy far weaker adversaries in the air, on the sea and land is not a military power?

Wall Street and the mega-wealthy now run the Treasury Department, the State Department, and the Department of Education while corporatists and militarists run other major departments and agencies. Where are the people’s voices in that plutocratic park?

As the opposition coalesces in their resistance to various measures pushed by Trump’s tantrums, it is interesting to note the surprising diversity of those challenging President Trump. More than a few corporate leaders are appalled by extreme Trumpism and their opposition is not restricted to the destabilizing bill to replace Obamacare or to Silicon Valley.

Sure, corporate CEOs are tempted by the tax cuts and jettisoning of some regulations. But they know they are making record after-tax profits, record corporate after-tax pay for themselves, and the stock market is soaring. As they watch the growing rumble from the people in street demonstrations and at Congressional town meetings, there is building a little foreboding.

They’re thinking – why rock the boats (or yachts) – Trump is taking away what people already have – their health insurance –  and their health and safety protections while the Republicans plan to continue depressing their vote and rigging the electoral districts by gerrymandering. When a society, blocked from advancing justice, is unraveling what fair play there remains, the corporate bosses, who see beyond tomorrow, get worried, for good reason.

The tower of contradictions, being constructed by Trump and the most extreme Republican Party in its history, won’t be camouflaged or distracted for long by provocative, prevaricating 3:00 am tweets from the White House. Reported by Eurasia Review 4 hours ago.

CBO Predicts 24 Million Uninsured From Affordable Care Act Revision

$
0
0
CBO Predicts 24 Million Uninsured From Affordable Care Act Revision The GOP's replacement plan for the Affordable Care Act would cause 24 million Americans to lose health coverage over the next decade according to the report issued on Monday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, according to The Boston Globe. The report highlights some of the main issues concerning the possible repeal and replacement of Obamacare facing the American health are markets.“The CBO estimate that millions of Americans could lose their health insurance coverage if the House bill were to become law is cause for alarm,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, a Republican. “It should prompt the House to slow down and reconsider certain provisions of the bill.” The GOP House... Reported by WorldNews 4 hours ago.

Global Obesity Has Reached Pandemic Levels, According to New Report by Aetna International

$
0
0
Global Obesity Has Reached Pandemic Levels, According to New Report by Aetna International *Business Wire India*Urgent action is required to limit the global fallout from rising obesity levels, according to a report published by Aetna International, one of the world’s leading health insurance providers.   Aetna International combined data from the World Health Organisation (WHO), the United Nations, governments and the global food industry to form a comprehensive analysis which presents a true picture of global obesity. The report, “Globesity: Tackling the world’s obesity pandemic”, calls upon governments, food producers, retailers, employers and insurance companies to combine their efforts to tackle the obesity crisis.   Richard di Benedetto, President of Aetna International, said: “The rise in obesity rates make it clear; there needs to be a shift in the narrative around diet and healthy living. We must work together to combine our knowledge and expertise in order to curb the rise of globesity.”   The WHO statistics show that obesity rates have more than doubled since 1980, with 13 percent of adults worldwide classified as obese and nearly 40 percent as overweight. The report findings show that these numbers will rise further if urgent, collaborative and targeted action is not taken.   The report concludes that the only way to tackle globesity is through a newly formed holistic approach combining health incentives, taxes and education programs. It has been proven that one of the most effective means of reducing obesity is providing clear information about the direct correlation between nutrition, weight gain and non-communicable diseases.   “Aetna is committed to being part of the solution to globesity and to creating a stronger, healthier global community. We are working towards establishing a think-tank with the sole purpose of finding solutions to the problems presented by worldwide obesity”, concludes Mr di Benedetto.   Ends   *Notes to the Editors*   *About Aetna International*   Aetna International is committed to helping create a stronger, healthier global community by delivering comprehensive health care benefits and population health solutions worldwide. One of the largest providers of international private medical insurance, Aetna International serves more than 700,000 members worldwide, including expatriates, local nationals and business travellers. Its global benefits include medical, dental, vision and emergency assistance and, in some regions, life and disability. Aetna International also offers customised technological and health management solutions for health care systems, government entities and large employers to improve people’s health, enhance quality of care and contain costs. For more information, see www.aetnainternational.com.   *About Aetna*   Aetna is one of the nation's leading diversified health care benefits companies, serving an estimated 46.7 million people with information and resources to help them make better informed decisions about their health care. Aetna offers a broad range of traditional, voluntary and consumer-directed health insurance products and related services, including medical, pharmacy, dental, behavioral health, group life and disability plans, and medical management capabilities, Medicaid health care management services, workers' compensation administrative services and health information technology products and services. Aetna's customers include employer groups, individuals, college students, part-time and hourly workers, health plans, health care providers, governmental units, government-sponsored plans, labor groups and expatriates. For more information, see http://www.aetna.com/ and learn about how Aetna is helping to build a healthier world. @AetnaNews      
  View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170313005130/en/ Reported by Business Wire India 3 hours ago.

CBO Sees 24 Million More Uninsured, $337 Billion Deficit Cut With GOP Plan

$
0
0
The number of Americans without health insurance would grow by 24 million under a House Republican proposal to topple most of the Affordable Care Act, according to a nonpartisan report that is likely to complicate GOP lawmakers’ efforts to unite around the plan. Reported by Wall Street Journal 2 hours ago.

Breitbart News Leads The Charge Against GOP Health Care Bill

$
0
0
CNN anchor Chris Cuomo said Tuesday morning that newly leaked audio of House Speaker Paul Ryan could damage congressional Republicans’ ability to pass a health care bill “more than anything that’s happened thus far.”

On the recording from a private conference call in October, Ryan is heard telling House Republicans that he couldn’t defend then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump at that moment or “in the future.” His comments came amid a scandal over the now-president bragging on tape about groping women.

The never-before-heard recording didn’t come to light through a liberal or mainstream news site. Rather, the right-wing, nationalist Breitbart News published it Monday night. 

That Breitbart would drop this 5-month-old recording now ― as Ryan and the Trump administration make their case for a health care bill to repeal and “replace” Obamacare ― may appear surprising. After all, the site vigorously supported Trump’s candidacy and its former chairman, Steve Bannon, is chief strategist in the White House.

But Breitbart News emerged as a force in Washington through its sustained attacks on Republican establishment. Boisterous commenters joined in to label politicians deemed insufficiently conservative as RINOs ― Republicans In Name Only. The site boosted Trump during the 2016 election as an alternative to the Washington establishment, and has long characterized Ryan as emblematic of conventional GOP politics. Breitbart News has noticeably blamed Ryan for any problems with the Republican bill to replace Obamacare, knowns as the American Health Care Act. The site has portrayed the bill as part of an effort by the speaker to mislead the president into supporting legislation that betrays conservative principles. 

Still, Breitbart’s opposition to the health care bill ― which it has called “Obamacare Lite” and “Obamacare 2.0” ― runs the risk of antagonizing Trump, who publicly supports the bill, and administration officials arguing on its behalf. 

After Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said Sunday that “nobody will be worse off financially” under the Republicans’ plan, Breitbart News mocked the claim on Twitter and questioned whether it would go down as the “lie of the year.” A Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation report published Monday suggests that as many as 24 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the GOP bill. 

Trump is a devoted Breitbart reader, as Bannon told The Huffington Post last summer, and some suspect he made an unsubstantiated claim about former President Barack Obama “wiretapping” his building after reading an article on the site.

So it’s likely that the president has seen the site’s blaring, negative headlines about the Republican health care bill. He also may have seen Breitbart’s broadsides amplified on major TV networks, as CNN and MSNBC played the Ryan recording more than a dozen times on Tuesday.Breitbart News’ most critical coverage of Ryan has come from Matthew Boyle, the chief Washington correspondent who long championed Trump’s candidacy and recently scored an Oval Office interview.

However, Boyle reportedly told colleagues last week that “there are no sacred cows in war” ― meaning the site would even attack Republicans if they strayed from Breitbart’s brand of populist, nationalist conservatism. He has interviewed several Republicans who are concerned with or opposed to the health care bill, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

“I don’t think it makes any sense, and I think [Ryan]’s trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the president,” Paul told Boyle.

“Everybody, I think, knows that Paul Ryan does not have President Trump’s best interests at heart, right?” Boyle said Monday morning on Breitbart News’ Sirius radio show. “He tried to undermine him repeatedly during the course of 2016, even after he was the Republican nominee for president. Paul Ryan did nothing to help President Trump win on November the 8th. Nothing. Nothing. And since then has been repeatedly trying to co-opt and destroy the Trump agenda.”

That night, Boyle dropped the recording of Ryan saying he wouldn’t publicly defend Trump ― even as he was the Republican nominee. In the article, Boyle disclosed that Breitbart News was provided “a portion” of the Ryan conference call that included the speaker’s remarks. He did not mention when Breitbart News obtained the recording.

But Axios’ Mike Allen reported Tuesday that Breitbart’s “bomb” was one that “Ryan opponents had been husbanding for months, waiting to detonate at a time of maximum vulnerability.” 

A Breitbart spokesman declined to make Boyle or editor-in-chief Alexander Marlow available for interviews. There remains speculation whether Bannon, who was a fierce critic of the Republican establishment while leading Breitbart, is behind the site’s opposition to the bill or has at least sanctioned it (even while advising a president who publicly supports it).

Bannon recently denied any involvement in Boyle’s “absurd” story about chief of staff Reince Priebus’s job being in jeopardy. Bannon and Priebus, who are viewed as leading rival centers of power, have tried convincing people outside the White House that they get along.

Bannon did not respond to requests for comment on Breitbart’s coverage.

It remains to be seen what, if any, effect Breitbart’s crusade has on Republican support for the bill. But the site reported Tuesday that Trump has scheduled a call with Ryan “as healthcare bill hangs in balance.”

How will Trump’s first 100 days impact you?
Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get breaking
updates on Trump’s presidency by messaging us
here.

Sign up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday, we will bring you the best original reporting, long form writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how it’s all made. Click here to sign up!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Jay Inslee: GOP plan confirms ‘our worst fears’ about repealing Obamacare

$
0
0
Washington state regulators are expecting to release details Wednesday on the impact of the House Republicans’ American Health Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimated Monday the act will cost 24 million people to lose their health insurance over the next decade in the U.S. The Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner has been preparing a detailed analysis of the impact to Washington state since the long-awaited Republican plan was revealed last week. Gov. Jay Inslee had asked… Reported by bizjournals 9 hours ago.

Donald Trump's Promise Of 'Insurance For Everybody' Now Comes With Caveats

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― In January, Donald Trump made a remarkable promise: Under his administration, “everybody” would have health care coverage.

“We’re going to have insurance for everybody,” Trump said. “There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can’t pay for it, you don’t get it. That’s not going to happen with us.” 

In 2015, Trump similarly told CBS’s “60 Minutes,” “Everybody’s got to be covered.”

But it’s clear now that everybody will not have health insurance under the GOP plan to replace the Affordable Care Act. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that 24 million people stand to lose coverage over the next decade under the Republican American Health Care Act. 

Although the White House disputes the CBO’s conclusions, press secretary Sean Spicer was already adding caveats to the president’s January pledge on Tuesday.

In his press briefing, Spicer argued that Obamacare created expensive plans that people can’t afford, so they decided to go without health coverage. He said Trump’s plan would create lower costs and give “more people the option to have health care.”

“Everybody has a choice to get it,” Spicer added, “and I think that’s what we want to do is give everyone who wants to get health care the financial ability to get it.”

Later, Spicer said “insurance for everybody” was less of a promise and more of a “goal.”

“I think the president’s goal is to make insurance available to everybody,” he said. “Yes, that’s what he intends to do. I think that is the goal of this is to make sure that every American has the choice and a plan that they can afford, and that they have the choice to buy. And that’s not what they have now.”

In other words, instead of everyone having insurance, as Trump promised, now the White House’s goal is that everyone will have the choice to have insurance. 

The CBO, in its much-awaited analysis released Monday, also took issue with the White House’s claim that health care will suddenly be significantly more affordable. It found, for example, that a 64-year-old who makes $26,500 could face an increase in his or her premiums from $1,700 now to $14,600 under the GOP bill. 

The Republican scheme would also likely increase how much people pay for their deductible ― the amount of money people pay upfront before insurance benefits kick in ― because it would get rid of the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that insurance plans cover at least 60 percent of medical costs. So premiums may go down, but that’s because insurance companies would be able to offer skimpier plans that cover less and have higher out-of-pocket costs. 

*Want more updates from Amanda Terkel? Sign up for her newsletter, Piping Hot Truth, **here**.*

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

Washington loses under Republican answer to ACA

$
0
0
Republican health insurance proposal is bad for Washington state and its citizens. Reported by Seattle Times 9 hours ago.

This Republican bill would let your employer demand access to your genetic information

$
0
0
We’ve reported before on the scam that is the workplace “wellness” program. These are ostensibly voluntary initiatives that aim to goad employees into healthier lifestyles — say through diet, exercise and smoking cessation — by offering them a discount on their health insurance premiums or some... Reported by L.A. Times 8 hours ago.

Marathon Oil and Community Health skid; MoneyGram soars

$
0
0
Marathon Oil and Community Health skid; MoneyGram soars Hospital operators fell after the Congressional Budget Office said the Republican health care bill would sharply reduce the number of people with health insurance and Medicaid coverage. Companies in transportation, including airlines, railroads and shipping companies, lagged the rest of the market. Companies that sell everyday household goods did better than the rest of the market on Tuesday. Reported by SeattlePI.com 10 hours ago.

The CBO score has made Trumpcare's biggest test even tougher

$
0
0
The CBO score has made Trumpcare's biggest test even tougher Despite the American Health Care Act drawing support from House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and President Donald Trump, the leadership's biggest problem still remains — senators in their own party.

Republican senators have cast doubt on the AHCA — which would repeal and replace Obamacare — after the Congressional Budget Office estimated in a report Monday that the law would cause as many as 24 million more Americans to lack health insurance by 2026.

"It's awful. It has to be a concern," said Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who has introduced his own alternative to the AHCA. "President Trump said he wanted as many people covered as under Obamacare."

Republicans from stronghold states such as South Carolina, Louisiana, and Arkansas have expressed misgivings about the legislation after the CBO report, putting the future of the healthcare law in doubt.

*'We need to do better'*

"We need to do better," Sen. Steve Daines of Montana said in a statement following the CBO report.

Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina said the CBO score should cause Republicans to delay their bill until they can make changes.

"At the end of the day we should pause and try to improve the product in the light of the CBO analysis rather than just rejecting it," said Graham, who has previously said the GOP should "slow down" on the healthcare overhaul.

And Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas launched into a lengthy rebuke of the AHCA on conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt's show. He said that while the CBO director "isn't Moses" when it comes to estimating the number of people losing coverage, he believed the CBO was "directionally correct" about the coverage losses.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Susan Collins of Maine, meanwhile, also expressed concerns over the potential effects described in the report.

*Little margin for error*

The biggest problem for Republican leaders is that only a few defections from the party are enough to derail the AHCA's path to Trump's desk.

The party holds a 52-seat majority in the Senate, so losing only three votes would prevent the law from passing. Given the number of senators that have previously said they have objections with the bill and the lawmakers that expressed doubts after the CBO score, there is a real chance that the GOP could have many more defectors.

Plus, Senate procedural rules could stop the bill in its tracks. The Byrd Rule does not allow a bill going through budget reconciliations — as in the case of the AHCA — to include anything that does not impact the budget's bottom line. Analysts and lawmakers have said that various aspects of the AHCA could violate the provision and stop the bill in its tracks.

The bill passed two House committees last week and will be considered by the House Budget Committee on Thursday.

*SEE ALSO: A top Republican senator blew up Trump's '3-phase plan' for healthcare overhaul*

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'That makes no sense!': Matt Lauer grills Kellyanne Conway over the timing of Michael Flynn’s resignation Reported by Business Insider 9 hours ago.

GOP Health Bill Draws Opposition, Lifts Concerns About Health Care

$
0
0
The Republican proposal to replace the Affordable Care Act has done more than generate a negative reaction. It has also boosted worries about health care to the point where it may soon rival jobs and the economy as the issue Americans select as most important.

The bill that would effectively repeal the health insurance law also known as “Obamacare” has gained a high profile in the days following its unveiling by Republican congressional leaders and endorsement by President Trump. Four out of five Americans say they have been following news about the proposal either very (38 percent) or somewhat closely (41 percent), and a 55 to 42 percent majority of Americans say they oppose the bill.

As a result, general concerns about health care are on the rise. On the very first question asked on SurveyMonkey’s regular national tracking survey, 23 percent of Americans now select health care as the issue that matters most, a three percentage point increase (from 20 percent) over the past week, and a gain of six points (from 17 percent) since late February.While health care has been the second ranking issue among Americans throughout the first two months of the new Trump administration, it now trails “jobs and the economy” (at 27 percent) by just four percentage points.

Democrats are typically more concerned than Republicans about the health care issue, but distance has increased from a gap of 7 to 8 percentage points in early February to 17 points on this survey, with the sharp rise in concerns about health care in the past week coming mostly from Democrats. Currently 32 percent of Democrats select health care as the most important issue, compared to just 15 percent of Republicans and 22 percent of independents.Again, owing in part to criticism from across the political spectrum, the Republican replacement bill starts out under water, with far more opposition (55 percent) than support (42 percent), and with twice as many Americans saying they are strongly opposed (38 percent) than strongly supportive (18 percent).

Partisan polarization on this issue is unsurprising, given the explicit Republican sponsorship of a bill to repeal and replace the highest profile achievement of the outgoing Democratic president. Nearly nine out of ten Democrats (88 percent) say they oppose the Republican replacement plan, and nearly as many Republicans (84 percent) favor it.

Yet those with less partisan attachment have largely turned against the bill. Americans who initially identify as independent oppose the Republican health care bill by a large margin (40 percent support, 59 percent oppose). Independents who who lean to neither party are against it by an even larger margin (32 percent support, 61 percent oppose).The usual partisan polarization fades, however, when it comes to strength of opinion, as the share of Democrats who say they strongly oppose the bill (68 percent) far exceeds the proportion of Republicans who strongly support it (46 percent). Put simply, the Republican plan has done more than draw opposition from Democrats (and independents), it has enraged and energized the Democratic base. Meanwhile the Republicans who say they support the bill are relatively lukewarm about it.

The contrast in intensity of opinion leads to result that may seem a little backwards: Democrats report following news about the *Republican health care plan more closely than Republican identifiers. Far more Democrats (50 percent) say they have been following news about the bill “very closely” than Republicans (32 percent) or independents (34 percent).As a result, the voters who say they are following news about the Republican bill most closely oppose it by a two-to-one margin (33 percent favor, 67 percent oppose).

The unveiling of the Republican health plan has not altered opinions about the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) it aims to replace. Nearly two-thirds of Americans prefer to let the ACA stand (17 percent) or “change it so it does more” (47 percent), while just a third prefer to repeal it completely (27 percent) or “change it so it does less” (6 percent).Most of the interviews for this survey were conducted before the release on Monday afternoon of a Congressional Budget Office analysis projecting that the Republican bill would “cause 24 million people to lose health insurance within a decade,” and the interviews done after did not make a significant difference in support for the bill. 

However, about a third (32 percent) of those who currently support the Republican bill also say they prefer to change the ACA so that it “does more.” Most of these voters identify or lean to the Republicans, so while we can only speculate about how they will resolve their dissonant views, but at very least, the latest news puts support for the Republican health care replacement plan under more duress.

Methodology: This SurveyMonkey Tracking poll was conducted online March 10-13, 2017 among a national sample of 2,423 adults ages 18 and up. Respondents for this survey were selected from the nearly 3 million people who take surveys on the SurveyMonkey platform each day. Data for this week have been weighted for age, race, sex, education, and geography using the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey to reflect the demographic composition of the United States. Full topline results and detailed demographic breakdowns can be viewed here. This article is cross-posted to the SurveyMonkey Election Tracking blog.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

GOP trying to salvage health bill after millions projected to lose insurance

$
0
0
Opposition to the GOP healthcare plan mounted Tuesday after the Congressional Budget Office projected that the bill would lead 14 million people to lose health insurance in 2018. As Nancy Cordes reports, Republican leaders tried to defend the bill, but some signaled a willingness to change it. Reported by CBS News 8 hours ago.

Republicans May Be Ready To Redefine Success On Obamacare

$
0
0
WASHINGTON ― With the GOP bill facing opposition from House conservatives, and a dismal Congressional Budget Office score stirring opposition from moderates and the Senate, Republicans seem to be scaling back the goals for their Obamacare repeal-and-replace.

Instead of actually overhauling the Affordable Care Act, Republicans may now just be trying to pass a bill in the House ― with the recognition that the Senate will never agree to a House-passed plan and that rowdy House conservatives may never accept a Senate bill.

“The focus of House leadership has been more about getting a bill out of the House that is unchanged and in keeping with the Better Way plan, instead of truly seeing to potential roadblocks that exist in the House and Senate,” one GOP House member told The Huffington Post on Tuesday.

The lawmaker predicted that Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and the White House would move the bill further to the right in an effort to get reluctant conservatives onboard. Such a move would open up the measure to more moderate objections, with centrist Republicans already expressing discomfort over projections that 24 million people would lose health insurance and provisions that phase out the Medicaid expansion. Still, conservatives have made it clear they won’t support the bill as is, so giving in to demands from the House Freedom Caucus may be the only way forward.

Or there may be no way forward.President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that it’s in the political interest of Republicans to just let the Obamacare exchanges collapse. “Let it be a disaster, because we can blame that on the Dems,” Trump told governors two weeks ago, summing up a thought he’s expressed repeatedly.

If Trump and some Republicans now think their best course of action is to do nothing and continue blaming problems with the health care system on Democrats, then perhaps the best cover they can offer their members is to move a GOP bill out of the House, watch it die in the Senate, and then spend the next two years blaming Senate Democrats in states that Trump won.

In that scenario, voters fail to recognize that Republicans have the power to pass this bill without a single Democratic vote, and the ire over Obamacare doesn’t dissipate even though voters have seen the GOP alternative.

If moderates knew that the House legislation would never go into effect, it might allow them to support the bill. It would become just another messaging vote.

House Republican aides are already starting to blame the Senate for intransigence.

“The question people should be looking at is whether Republican senators like Tom Cotton and Rand Paul are actually interested in repealing Obamacare, or whether they’re sabotaging this to preserve the Medicaid expansion in their states,” one senior House GOP aide told HuffPost on Tuesday. “These senators masquerading with conservative objections are too afraid to admit they want to keep Obamacare.”

Arkansas (Cotton’s state) and Kentucky (Paul’s state) have been two of the biggest winners from the Medicaid expansion, so passing a bill that is projected to make $880 billion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade may not be in the interests of their constituents. But standing up for Obamacare, after Republicans have railed against the 2010 health care law for years, is basically political suicide. If the repeal-and-replace legislation simply went away, however, with senators opposing the plan because it’s insufficiently conservative, then expansion states like Arkansas and Kentucky would never feel the effects of the Republican plan.

Again, House aides were happy to level the charge.

One GOP leadership aide noted that Trump had backed the House legislation. “So,” the aide said, “senators who have spent the last couple of weeks grandstanding against this reality are going to need to decide whether they want to get serious and get this done, or be the ones responsible for keeping Obamacare in place. That’s the choice.”

But that assumes the House can get this legislation out of their chamber. Even with conservative concessions, there will likely be a number of hardline Republicans who won’t support the basic structure of the bill. And with the CBO’s cheerless score ― and perhaps some more conservative changes ― moderates will have little incentive to vote for the House bill.

You can easily name about a dozen conservatives who have come out strongly against the legislation and appear unwilling to support the bill even with changes. They include Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), Dave Brat (R-Va.), Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Steve King (R-Iowa), Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) and Ted Yoho (R-Fla.).

Then there are a handful of more moderate members who look apt to vote against the bill or have already said they won’t support it. Put on that list Reps. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.), Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Leonard Lance (R-N.J.), John Katko (R-N.Y.), Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), and Rob Wittman (R-Va.).

The defection of those lawmakers would be enough to sink the GOP bill in the House. And there are other House members who have expressed reservations.

Which is all to say that even under the best circumstances, even if Trump gets actively behind the health care plan and pressures reluctant lawmakers, this is a tough sell.

If Ryan and other GOP leaders can just get the bill out of the House, that would be a win for them, which is an amazing recalibration of expectations. Not so long ago, Republicans were promising the swift repeal of Obamacare and its replacement with a better plan that would be cheaper for everyone and expand coverage. Those promises seem to have fallen by the wayside. And in their place is another messaging vote.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

Drug company CEO has trouble with patients paying his prices

$
0
0
Too many diabetics in the U.S. are inadvertently getting stuck with a big bill, making it imperative that drugmakers and middlemen at the heart of the country’s complex pricing system fix the issue before regulators step in, the world’s biggest maker of insulin said. “It was never the intention that individual patients should end up paying the list price,” Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen, who took over as chief executive officer at Novo Nordisk at the start of the year, said in an interview Tuesday. Under the current system, pharmaceutical companies set the list prices and then typically offer secret rebates to pharmacy benefits managers and middlemen like Express Scripts Holding. Drug prices have been a frequent target of President Trump, who told Democrats at the White House last week that he wants to do something about the cost of medicines, according to a lawmaker at the meeting. Republicans have also proposed repealing and replacing the Affodable Care Act to reduce health insurance costs. Reported by SFGate 7 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images