Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Obamacare’s Rate Increases and What it Means for Employers

$
0
0
Premiums inside the exchange are skyrocketing across the country. With this BeniComp Advantage, employers will be able to identify, realign, and manage their health risks to control their 2017 health costs.

Tampa, FL (PRWEB) November 04, 2016

November 1st marked the start of exchange sign-ups for 2017 Obamacare coverage. While rates vary in different states, most insurance premiums rose by an average of 25% around the country. Arizona seemed to have the worst outcome with an enormous 145% increase. There are many factors to these rate increases, but a big factor is due to the fact that insurance companies are leaving the market. Aetna is exiting the exchange in 11 states for 2017; UnitedHealthcare is exiting 31 states; and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee has announced their departure of three of the state’s largest exchange markets. Is Obamacare imploding?

Tennessee insurance commissioner, Julie Mix McPeak, said recently the exchange in her state is “very near collapse” as she agreed to premium increases of up to 62%. This was after rate increases were authorized in August for an average of 46% for Cigna and 44% for Humana. But while the exchange immediately impacts individuals, how is it impacting employers?

According to Kaiser Health News, big employers can expect health costs to rise by 6% in 2017. Although it may be an average increase compared to previous years, new surveys show that it surpasses economic growth. “These cost increases, while stable, are both unsustainable and unacceptable,” said Brian Marcotte, CEO of the National Business Group on Health, a coalition of large employers that received responses from 133 companies.

No longer able to afford health care at current rates, many employers have turned to high-deductible health plans. However, raising deductibles and shifting health costs to employees is only a temporary fix, and puts financial strain on employees. In order to truly control health insurance expenses, companies need to make changes that will help control claims.

“It’s hard to control something when you don’t know the root cause of the issue. Companies need to identify, realign, and manage their risk in order to truly control the cost of health insurance premiums,” says Doug Short, President and CEO of BeniComp Insurance Company. How does one accomplish that? Through outcome-based deductible incentives.

BeniComp’s patent-pending, supplemental, preventive health insurance product, called BeniComp Advantage, raises the deductible of the company and, subsequently, lowers the premiums, which allows employees and the employer to see an immediate ROI. Then monetary rewards are tied to passing health risk identifiers such as obesity and nicotine use. Low-risk employees can enjoy the familiar low deductible, while high-risk employees receive coaching toward a healthier lifestyle. Executed well, outcome-based deductible incentives can result in over 95% participation, as well as decreased claims.

One client introduced BeniComp Advantage to their employees, which decreased premiums by 22% in the first year resulting in over $182,000 in savings. After three years of having BeniComp in place, this client was able to receive a renewal rate that decreased by $5.36 per employee. Had BeniComp not been in place, this client would have received a 32% increase at renewal. Overall, this client has saved over $650,000 in health care costs during 3 years.

While it’s no secret that America has a health insurance crisis, companies can only shift costs to employees for so long without addressing the long-term effects of rising claims. However, by pairing outcome-based deductible incentives with a high deductible health place represses rising premiums and addresses the claims that are contributing to the future costs of the plan. The result in a health place that is sustainable for the future.

###

ABOUT BENICOMP
Founded in 1962, BeniComp later expanded its services to include BeniComp Advantage, a supplemental group health insurance product that identifies health risks early and aims to proactively improve health in America. Offering employee wellness solutions nationwide, BeniComp's patent-pending policy has received numerous awards for innovation and best practices. BeniComp has been featured in Forbes Magazine, Employee Benefit News, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Medscape, and other publications for its innovative approach to providing solutions. For more information about BeniComp, visit http://www.benicomp.com. Reported by PRWeb 43 minutes ago.

New Trends with Health Insurance are Covered on "Front Page Profile" with James Earl Jones for Public Television

$
0
0
A new piece will look into the hot topic of health insurance.

(PRWEB) November 04, 2016

In an upcoming segment of “Front Page,” current trends in health insurance will be highlighted. James Earl Jones is the host of this documentary that is sure to appeal to a large audience range. Every person is concerned about healthcare regardless of culture, race, or level of income. The need for healthcare in relation to individuals and families can be challenging to obtain at times, though.

Medical advancements keep coming to the health field. There is no shortage of increased technology, efficiency, and knowledge. At the same time, there are more challenges than ever to provide health insurance that individuals can afford. Accessibility of health insurance is a problem that all of the technology and medical advancements in the world have been unable to solve. There are also soaring drug prices which make vital medications unattainable to many who cannot afford them. The government is putting increasing pressure on drug companies to make these prescriptions affordable. Behavioral healthcare will be given more attention in the future as well. Certainly, there are many health insurance complexities that still need to be worked out. This segment addresses these topics, and hot topics such as the Affordable Care Act, with professionals in the industry.

All of these new trends will be in this new “Front Page” segment intended for public television. Jones (Star Wars) hardly needs an introduction given his many years of top-notch film and audio achievement. The Front Page team is filled with talented and seasoned professionals who are sure to make for a documentary of the highest quality. There will be other important matters pertaining to humanity to be brought up in future episodes as well. The segments are distributed to Public Television PBS Member stations. Reported by PRWeb 43 minutes ago.

Why health care eats more of your paycheck every year

$
0
0
Millions of Americans are finding out this month that the price of their health insurance is going up next year — as it did this year, last year, and most of the years before that. And it’s not just that the price is going up, it’s that it goes up faster than wages and inflation, […] Reported by Seattle Times 1 day ago.

7 Things You May Not Know About Sally Field On Her 70th Birthday

$
0
0
What’s not to love about actress Sally Field? The Hollywood veteran is beautiful, talented, able to make us both laugh and cry, and not afraid of aging. “I’ve gathered strength behind my years, I owned them, I’ve earned them, I’ve deserved them, I have a right to have them,” Field said earlier this year. 

Indeed, the grandmother of five turns 70 on Sunday and we wanted to find some way of marking the occasion. While oodles of ink and pixels have been devoted to chronicling the career of the two-time Academy Award-winning star, we did uncover a few tidbits about her that might come as a surprise. Here are seven of them:

1. Sally Field landed her first big role when she was only 18.

Fresh out of high school, Field nabbed the lead in the TV series “Gidget,” which debuted in 1965. The show was canceled after only one season. But by then Field was so popular with TV audiences that a new sitcom was created for her, “The Flying Nun.” Initially she didn’t want to take the role of Sister Bertrille, as she believed she’d never be considered a serious actress. But her stepfather wouldn’t have it, telling her that if she didn’t, she may never work again.
2. Of all the things she’s accomplished, Field is most proud of her sons, Peter, Eli and Sam.

Friends say Field never even goes out to dinner without keeping her phone on the table as she never wants to miss a call from one of her boys.

In 2014, Field released a passionate open letter about her youngest son, who is gay. Here’s one part of it:

“One of the great privileges of my life to have been allowed to be a part of Sam’s journey.

There are people out there ― organizations and politicians, strangers who have never even met Sam ― who would rather devote themselves to denying his happiness.

Why would anyone want to prevent my son― or anyone’s son or daughter ― from having basic legal safeguards like family medical leave, Social Security survivors benefits, or health insurance? It doesn’t make any sense ― but it won’t change until people speak out. I’m proud to stand with HRC [Human Rights Campaign] to add my voice. Will you join me?”


3. Despite two divorces, Field hasn’t soured on romance. 

Since divorcing her second husband, producer Alan Greisman, in 1993, Field has remained single. But she told People earlier this year that she’d be up for dating. “If I knew anyone I wanted to be with, I would hope I would have the gumption to bang on his door,” she says. “I just don’t know who that is.”

4. Field was cast as Tom Hanks’ love interest ― then his mother.

In 1988, Field played Hanks’ love interest in “Punchline.” Six years later, she played Hanks’ mother in “Forrest Gump.” She was around 48 when that movie came out; Hanks was 10 years younger.
5. Field’s memorable Academy Award acceptance speech for the 1984 film “Places in the Heart” is still often misquoted.

Upon accepting her Best Actress award for her role as a 1930s southern widow trying to save her family farm, Field said: “I can’t deny the fact that you like me. Right now, you like me.” That’s what she actually said. Unfortunately, she’s often misquoted as having said this instead: “You like me. You really like me.”

Over the years, many celebrities have parodied the misquoted speech, including actor Albert Brooks, who tweeted the following after he found out he wasn’t nominated for an Oscar for his role in “Drive” in 2012: “And to the Academy: ‘You don’t like me. You really don’t like me.”

6. While playing Norma Rae, Field fought so hard in one scene not to be loaded into the police car that she actually broke the rib of an actor playing one of the policemen.

Field won widespread praise from critics for her portrayal of the feisty mill worker in North Carolina who seeks to unionize the mill. The role ― turned down by Marsha Mason, Jane Fonda, Faye Dunaway and Jill Clayburgh ― won Field an Academy Award for best actress.7. Although she’s landed many meaty roles throughout her career, Field still laments the lack of substantial parts for older women.

Field told AARP The Magazine earlier this year that most of the roles she’s offered these days are far from challenging. “I’m in a place in my life where the stuff that comes to me is just so generic, and you’re like, ‘Oh-kay.’ It’s the mother with all the kids, and story is really about all the kids, and the mother is just there.” She recalled that when she played the matriarch, Nora, on the TV series “Brothers and Sisters,” from 2006 to 2011, she pushed the network to allow her character to evolve and grow. But the network, she says, wasn’t having it. 

Today her goal is to play complex characters her own age. 

“I’m an aging actor, and my face and body — I have to be able to play what I am,” she adds. “If I play a character who is attractive, I want to be attractive, but I’m also on my way to being 70, so my face is drooping and falling, and my body isn’t what it was.”

Well, you look pretty good to us. Happy birthday, Ms. Field. Here’s hoping you have many many more. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 20 hours ago.

Is Obamacare really affordable? Not for the middle class

$
0
0
Obamacare is now a tale of two health insurance programs. Reported by CNNMoney 20 hours ago.

Green Circle Health Joins the BENEFITFOCUS® Ecosystem

$
0
0
Green Circle Health will link its GCH Platform within the BENEFITFOCUS® Marketplace, allowing employers to offer employees and their families an opportunity for greater control over their healthcare and wellbeing.

Pensacola Beach, Fla. (PRWEB) November 04, 2016

Green Circle Health (GCH) announced it has joined the BENEFITFOCUS® Ecosystem and will link its GCH Platform within the BENEFITFOCUS® Marketplace, allowing employers to offer employees and their families an opportunity for greater control over their healthcare and wellbeing.

The BENEFITFOCUS® Ecosystem enables partners to link their solutions with the BENEFITFOCUS® Platform using BENEFITFOCUS® standards. The ecosystem aims at linking the BENEFITFOCUS® Marketplace and its ecosystem of “best-in-class” partners.

The GCH Platform enables employers to configure and deploy personalized health and wellness programs based on a company’s unique culture and overall goals. Leveraging a mobile-first approach with the industry’s most innovative remote monitoring technology, the GCH Platform facilitates the self-management of chronic conditions and overall wellness, while also promoting both group and family health engagement. The GCH Platform allows employees to create comprehensive health profiles for family medical history, store medical records and update health vitals and conditions in real-time. Through the GCH Platform, employees can also seek coaching and further coordinate care to become responsible healthcare consumers and better manage their family’s health, wellness and chronic disease treatment. Employers can then configure rewards programs to encourage employees to adopt healthier lifestyles and incentivize behavioral change.

The GCH Platform is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) and other industry standards and was recently announced as a winner in an ONC Consumer Health Data Aggregator Challenge.

BENEFITFOCUS® provides a leading cloud-based benefits management platform that simplifies how organizations and individuals shop for, enroll in, manage and exchange benefits. Every day leading employers, insurance companies and the consumers they serve rely on the BENEFITFOCUS® Platform to manage, scale and exchange benefits data seamlessly. In an increasingly complex benefits landscape, BENEFITFOCUS® brings order to chaos so employers and their employees have access to better information, make better decisions and lead better lives.

“It is essential in today’s modern, technologically-driven society that employees have greater control over their medical information and the best available tools to create comprehensive personalized wellness programs coupled with results-driven incentives,” said Dinesh Sheth, CEO and founder of Green Circle Health. Reported by PRWeb 18 hours ago.

Avante Insurance Awarded “Best Overall Company” at South Florida Business Excellence and Awards Forum

$
0
0
Avante Insurance was awarded the title of “Best Overall Company” by the 2016 South Florida Business Excellence and Awards Forum. The event, presented by ActionCoach Team Sage, BNI Miami and Admin eSolutions, featured business awards that were created by owners of small businesses and world class presenters and culminated in an awards ceremony that honored the best of the best small businesses in South Florida.

Coral Gables, FL (PRWEB) November 04, 2016

Avante Insurance, South Florida’s family owned and operated insurance experts, announced today that it was crowned 2016 Best Overall Company by the South Florida Business Excellence and Awards Forum.

At a ceremony that highlighted the best of the best small businesses in the South Florida area, representatives of Avante Insurance accepted the distinguished award. The event was attended by leadership from some of the most successful, thriving local businesses and industries throughout the community.

The day-long conference presented a host of ideas and strategies for unique business building. Attendees were challenged to examine and consider several aspects of their business, including customer service strategies, building moments of connection and the importance of designing all business ventures carefully. This prestigious event also included keynote speeches from four-time TEDx presenter Paul Dunn and ActionCOACH chairman Brad Sugars.

“At Avante Insurance, we are committed to establishing trusting and caring relationships, and our customers and company partners feel valued, appreciated, and confident in our expertise,” said Avante Insurance CEO Gabriela Dominguez. “We are honored to be recognized for our involvement throughout the community.”

Avante Insurance prides itself on taking a knowledgeable, professional, and friendly approach to serving the South Florida community. For a complete list of our services, please visit our insurance solutions webpage, at http://www.avanteinsurance.com/insurance-solutions/.

About Avante Insurance:

Serving South Florida since 1978, Avante Insurance tailors its services to meet customers’ individual needs. Specializing in personal insurance, business and commercial insurance, and life and health insurance, Avante offers a wide range of services, both to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. Contact Avante Insurance today to learn more. Reported by PRWeb 17 hours ago.

The Rabble Understands Trade Pretty Well

$
0
0
There is no issue that has done more to fuel the unexpected success of anti-establishment candidates on the left and the right this year -- Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump -- than international trade.There is no issue about which establishment economic policy elites feel more certainty than trade.There is no issue about which elites feel more entitled to act on supposedly neutral, antiseptic technocratic analysis without the intrusion of tawdry politics than trade.And there is no issue that has done more to undermine the credibility and legitimacy of elites, political insiders, in the eyes of ordinary Americans, people trying to make an honest living, than trade.If one country can produce goods better or more cheaply than another can produce the same goods, elites argue, then the second country should find something else to do that they're good at and everyone will be better off. The argument dates back two centuries to David Ricardo, an economist before there really was such a thing. Ricardo's term was "comparative advantage." Unrestricted trade might create winners and losers at first, but the losses would be temporary. Advanced economies like ours would efficiently shift away from lower-skilled industries that were better suited to less advanced economies. The economy would grow in every country, consumers would get better and cheaper goods, and workers who lost jobs could find new jobs in industries that increased exports since more jobs would be created than lost. The prosperity that resulted would make it possible to smooth any bumps in the transition.According to elites, anyone who opposes international trade deals just does not understand comparative advantage or is motivated by xenophobia or some other dark impulse. Politicians who oppose the deals are of limited intellect or pander to the ignorance and prejudices of the rabble.When the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was signed earlier this year, there was enthusiastic support from policy elites. Jason Furman, the incumbent chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, explained comparative advantage to urge support for the trade agreement.Roger Lowenstein, a financial journalist perhaps best known for proclaiming Wall Street innocent of criminal conduct in the financial crisis, wrote "Two hundred years ago, David Ricardo explained why foreign trade was beneficial; today's trade deal opponents ignore him at their peril." Lowenstein said he hoped that before the vote on the agreement, members of Congress "will devote 10 minutes to learning about [Ricardo]."Gregory Mankiw, chair of the Council of Economic Advisors under President George W. Bush, was equally patronizing. "If Congress were to take an exam in Economics 101," he asked, "would it pass?" Among economists, Mankiw said, "the issue is a no brainer."Have any of them ever met workers who lost their jobs because a factory closed? I could introduce them to some. I represented a lot of them in Congress.I entered Congress at the beginning of 2003 to represent a new North Carolina district gained after the 2000 census. About half of the district was Wake County, which included Raleigh, where I lived. I had represented Wake County in the state senate for six years. Wake County was part of the Research Triangle. The Triangle prides itself in having one of the highest percentages of residents with doctorates of any region in the country. The Triangle was and is growing, prosperous and increasingly Democratic.The politics of redistricting is complicated. A compact, relatively homogenous, prosperous, well-educated district in Wake County, my political base, was entirely possible and seemed logical, but instead the district took a piece of Wake County and went west along the Virginia border through rural and small town North Carolina. The district included Eden, a town of about 15,000 right on the border, a two-hour drive from Raleigh.The economy of Eden was for about a century largely based on textiles. At the end of the nineteenth century, the textile industry picked up and moved from New England to the South so they could pay lower wages. In 1912, Marshall Field bought six mills in and around Eden and called the new company Fieldcrest Mills. The company mostly manufactured bedding and bath products such as sheets, towels and blankets. The company grew to employ more than 3000 workers in the area.Fieldcrest Mills acquired Cannon Manufacturing in the eighties and became Fieldcrest Cannon, and then Pillowtex bought Fieldcrest Cannon in the nineties. By then, textile manufacturers had begun to move factories to other countries, again so they could pay lower wages. Pillowtex's largest customer, Wal-Mart, demanded that the company move manufacturing to reduce labor costs, but Pillowtex refused. Pillowtex lost Wal-Mart's business and more and more market share to cheaper goods. The company began to shed jobs.Pillowtex went briefly into reorganization bankruptcy and on July 30, 2003 closed for good. Most of the news coverage was about Kannapolis, North Carolina, where 4,320 workers lost their jobs on one day. But the last 495 workers in the Eden plants, which were still called Fieldcrest, also lost their jobs.The governor's office had "rapid response teams" for factory closings, and my congressional office was part of the team for Eden, mostly to help workers apply for whatever federal assistance was available. I went to Eden to support my staff and to show my concern for the workers who had lost their jobs. And I might get my picture in the local paper since I was still the new congressman.The local union, the Union of Needle Trade Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), invited me to come to their union hall to meet some of the workers who had lost their jobs. The workers I met were mostly middle-aged. More hadn't finished high school than had started college. Some were white and some were African-American. They were still years away from Social Security or Medicare benefits. And they had no idea where they would find another job.I said that the Trade Adjustment Assistance would help them go to the community college to learn new skills, but they said that there were no jobs for them nearby whatever their skills. Fieldcrest workers who had lost their jobs in earlier layoffs were also looking, and other textile factories in the area had also shed jobs and appeared in danger of closing. A job in the Triangle in the pharmaceutical industry, one of the big winners from international trade, was not a realistic possibility.I talked with one couple in their fifties who had both had health problems. He'd had heart bypass surgery and she'd had cancer, or maybe it was the other way around. They both had high blood pressure and were on lots of medication for one thing or another. They lost their health insurance when they lost their jobs. They were entitled to buy continued coverage from their old insurer under the law at the time, but the premiums were obviously unaffordable on their income, which was not enough to live on as it was. They would have to do without and hope for the best.The workers all thought that they'd lost their jobs because of trade deals that let companies move factories to other countries where they could pay workers less. In truth, it would have been hard to protect their jobs in the long run without protective tariffs that might have started a full-fledged trade war.But I did not explain comparative advantage or tell them to read Ricardo.My office did everything we could to help those workers and they appreciated it. Over the years I did a ton of retail politics in Rockingham County, which included Eden. I visited factories and stood at the gate at shift change, I introduced myself from table to table at restaurants, I toured schools and gave an apple to every teacher (it sounds corny, but they loved it), I attended church services, I gave flags flown over the Capitol to new Eagle Scouts, I went to Friday night high school football games (Reidsville High School's team was a power), I went to street fairs, I had lunch with the Rotary Club, and on and on. And I might have been a Raleigh lawyer, but I have a Southern accent that I came by honestly.By 2010, the last time I ran for Congress, probably more Rockingham County voters had met me than had met some of their county commissioners. The county had been strongly Democratic in the past, and in the more progressive wing of the Party, largely because it had been the most unionized county in the state. I had always carried the county.But by 2010, the county's politics was dominated by a homegrown version of the Tea Party called "Will of the People." A local Democrat told me that many of the members had been Fieldcrest workers. I carried Wake County handily and won overall, but I got killed in Rockingham County. Down ballot Democrats in Rockingham County did worse. It hasn't gotten better since. Hillary Clinton may carry North Carolina, but it will be with votes from Raleigh, not from Rockingham County.There is no blinking that much of the anger on the right in the last eight years is the result of discomfort, and much worse, with out first African-American president. It was always wildly unrealistic to think that President Obama's election meant that we had become a post-racial society. And there will be discomfort, and much worse, with our first woman president.But much of the anger in 2010 and now is that ordinary Americans think that political insiders have no clue what their lives are like and don't much care.As attracted as economists and policy elites are to the symmetry of the theory of comparative advantage, research on the effect of trade is mixed at best. The effect of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the 1994 trade agreement with Mexico and Canada, on the overall economy has been relatively small--a rounding error in the GDP--but according to one estimate there has been a net loss of 700,000 American jobs to Mexico through 2011. The job losses were concentrated in certain communities, and the "displaced workers" did not readily find new jobs because the workers lived in the wrong place and had the wrong skills, just as the Fieldcrest workers said.The savings to consumers from cheaper goods have been negligible.In 2000, the United States granted "permanent normal trade relations" status with China, which guaranteed low tariffs. The effect of trade with China has been much larger. Economists estimate that Chinese imports have cost 2 to 2.4 million American jobs and resulted in a rapid decline in manufacturing employment in the United States. The regions that lost the most manufacturing jobs did not see an increase in jobs tied to exports. Even workers who kept their jobs in the affected regions were under wage pressure because of competition for jobs from displaced workers and because of the wage competition from foreign workers.The negative effects of trade were greatest on workers who had not gone to college, who were already the least prosperous. The positive effects were on corporate profits, either from exports or by reduced labor costs for goods sold in the United States, which benefited top executives and shareholders, who were already the most prosperous.
So trade increased inequality. The rabble may not have read Ricardo or studied the theory of comparative advantage, but they appear to understand the effect of unrestricted trade pretty well.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 17 hours ago.

An Open Letter to the Next President: Make College Students' Health a Priority

$
0
0
ACHA calls for mental health resources, access to quality student health insurance plans, and protection of privacy for sexual assault victims

Hanover, MD (PRWEB) November 04, 2016

The American College Health Association (ACHA) has published an open letter to the next president of the United States as a means to ensure that the health, well-being, and safety of our nation’s college students remains a priority in the next administration.

ACHA offers a three-point agenda of college health priorities to be addressed ideally within the new president’s first 100 days in office:

1. Expand Resources for Campus Mental Health Services and Suicide Prevention
ACHA implores the new administration to prioritize the adoption of the bipartisan-supported Mental Health on Campus Improvement Act and any related bills that would expand funding opportunities for increased adolescent/young adult mental health resources and suicide prevention initiatives.

2. Address Technical Fixes to the Affordable Care Act to Improve College Health Insurance Accessibility
ACHA asks the new administration to support legislative and regulatory approaches protecting the viability of student health insurance plans to retain the breadth of health insurance options currently available to college students.

3. Preserve Flexibilities to Protect Student Privacy Concerning Sexual Assault
ACHA encourages the new administration to extend the same privacy protection that licensed campus therapists and counselors commonly have under state and federal law to the lay volunteers and staff members on campus who also provide victim support and advocacy. ACHA offers further recommendations in its guidelines on addressing sexual assault.

This letter reminds the next president that because the college students of today are tomorrow’s workforce and leaders, facilitating and prioritizing their access to quality health care today will ultimately help ensure their future success.

About ACHA
The American College Health Association (ACHA), founded in 1920, is a national nonprofit association serving as the nation’s principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research. ACHA represents a diverse membership that provides and supports the delivery of health care, prevention, and wellness services for the nation’s 20 million college students. ACHA advocates for student health by integrating the critical role of college health into the mission of higher education. For more information about the association visit http://www.acha.org. Reported by PRWeb 17 hours ago.

This 1995 Mel Gibson Interview Is Strangely Super Relevant Again

$
0
0
The Mel Gibson-directed “Hacksaw Ridge” debuts Friday, following arguably a successful press cycle of redemption for the controversial star. Most notably, Stephen Colbert invited Gibson to be on “The Late Show” earlier this week. The two made a viral video together and Gibson kind-of-sort-of expressed remorse for the things he did and said in his younger days.

“Not my proudest moment, Stephen,” Gibson told the late-night host, presumably referring to his anti-Semitic comment to a police officer who pulled him over for suspected drunken driving in 2006. Gibson told the officer, “F**king Jews. The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” He could’ve also been referencing a racist rant from 2010 in which he told a woman, now infamously, “You look like a f**king pig in heat, and if you get raped by a pack of n***ers, it will be your fault.”  

Gibson continued to tell Colbert on the show, “But, you know, 10 years go by, I worked a lot on myself, I’m actually happier and healthier than I’ve been in a long time.”

To Colbert’s credit, the host pushed Gibson to have a more straightforward and clear-cut apology, but Gibson instead dodged all attempts to say sorry. Despite the entertainment industry welcoming him back into legitimacy over the last month with glowing reviews and puff-piece articles about his new beard, Gibson has yet to have a clear moment of remorse during this press tour. That’s always been his style, though.

Before the 2010 rant that derailed his career, Gibson had already created a long wake of controversies, often making racist, homophobic and sexist statements while being interviewed.

In retrospect, perhaps the definitive Gibson interview is the actor’s 1995 Playboy profile, which occurred during the time he was in postproduction for “Braveheart.” HuffPost secured a copy of the story from the Playboy archive.

In the piece, Playboy reporter Lawrence Grobel claims he got over eights hours of conversation time with Gibson, spanning multiple days. Grobel proceeds to publish long quotes from Gibson that essentially let the actor die by his own words.

When he’s not talking about fist fights he got in, a dog he illegally ate and stapling his sister’s head, or making light of a drunk-driving incident when he rear-ended a car, Gibson at least admits that he has a “self-destructive tendency” and can’t seem to keep his mouth shut. Of course, that’s abundantly clear when the actor ― about to make a significant career jump with “Braveheart” ― talks in length about why women are inherently untrustworthy and how the United States presidential election is rigged by an illuminati-type organization.

Gibson doesn’t seem like the kind of person who has regrets, but with his redemption movie coming out, he probably still would rather you didn’t reread the quotes below.

 

Gibson explains why men and women are not equal.

[Q] Playboy: What about allowing women to be priests?

[A] Gibson: No.

[Q] Playboy: Why not?

[A] Gibson: I’ll get kicked around for saying it, but men and women are just different. They’re not equal. The same way that you and I are not equal.

[Q] Playboy: That’s true. You have more money.

[A] Gibson: You might be more intelligent, or you might have a bigger dick. Whatever it is, nobody’s equal. And men and women are not equal. I have tremendous respect for women. I love them. I don’t know why they want to step down. Women in my family are the center of things. All good things emanate from them. The guys usually mess up.

[Q] Playboy: That’s quite a generalization.

[A] Gibson: Women are just different. Their sensibilities are different.


 

The Playboy interviewer presses for a specific example and Gibson calls a former business partner a “cunt.”

[Q] Playboy: Any examples?

[A] Gibson: I had a female business partner once. Didn’t work.

[Q] Playboy: Why not?

[A] Gibson: She was a cunt.

[Q] Playboy: And the feminists dare to put you down!

[A] Gibson: Feminists don’t like me, and I don’t like them. I don’t get their point. I don’t know why feminists have it out for me, but that’s their problem, not mine.

[Q] Playboy: What did you so dislike about your former business partner?

[A] Gibson: She was more vicious than any guy in business I’ve ever seen. She thought she needed to overcompensate for the fact that she was a woman. Which is just bullshit. It’s like unbelievable ferocity and unreasonableness. Then, when you got to her reason, she’d pull the woman thing on you. She wasn’t fair. They don’t play fair.


 

Gibson implies women are inherently out to “hurt” men, telling a joke that involves Hillary Clinton.

[Q] Playboy: All women, or just this woman?

[A] Gibson: It happens a lot. They’re not coming from the same place at all. There are certain things men will never understand about them. We’ll never get it. And you’re supposed to be nice to them. Because they can hurt you. It’s like that joke about the guy who bedded three women: Lorena Bobbitt, Tonya Harding and Hillary Clinton. He woke up with no penis, his kneecaps bashed in and no health insurance.


 

Referring to Bill Clinton, Gibson expresses his belief that all elections are rigged by a shadowy organization.

[Q] Playboy: How do you feel about Bill Clinton?

[A] Gibson: The guy who’s in charge isn’t going to be the front man, ever. If I were going to be calling the shots I wouldn’t make an appearance. Would you? You’d end up losing your head. It happens all the time. All those monarchs. If he’s the leader, he’s getting shafted. What’s keeping him in there? Why would you stay for that kind of abuse? Except that he has to stay for some reason. He was meant to be the president 30 years ago, if you ask me.

[Q] Playboy: He was just 18 then.

[A] Gibson: Somebody knew than that he would be president now.

[Q] Playboy: You really believe that?

[A] Gibson: I really believe that. He was a Rhodes scholar, right? Just like Bob Hawke. Do you know what a Rhodes scholar is? Cecil Rhodes established the Rhodes scholarship for those young men and women who want to strive for a new world order. Have you heard that before? George Bush? CIA? Really, it’s Marxism, but it just doesn’t want to call itself that. Karl had the right idea, but he was too forward about saying what it was. Get power but don’t admit to it. Do it by stealth. There’s a whole trend of Rhodes scholars who will be politicians around the world.


 

Gibson continues to talk about how he believes in a conspiracy theory about presidential assassinations.

[Q] Playboy: This certainly sounds like a paranoid sense of world history. You must be quite an assassination buff.

[A] Gibson: Oh, fuck. A lot of those guys pulled a boner. There’s something to do with the Federal Reserve that Lincoln did, Kennedy did and Reagan tried. I can’t remember what it was, my dad told me about it. Everyone who did this particular thing that would have fixed the economy got undone. Anyway, I’ll end up dead if I keep talking shit.


 

What other conspiracy theory does Gibson believe in? That evolution is a lie.

[Q] Playboy: Do you believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution or that God created man in his image?

[A] Gibson: The latter.

[Q] Playboy: So you can’t accept that we descended from monkeys and apes?

[A] Gibson: No, I think it’s bullshit. If it isn’t, why are they still around? How come apes aren’t people yet? It’s a nice theory, but I can’t swallow it. There’s a big credibility gap. The carbon dating thing that tells you how long something’s been around, how accurate is that, really? I’ve got one of Darwin’s books at home and some of that stuff is pretty damn funny. Some of his stuff is true, like that the giraffe has a long neck so it can reach the leaves. But I just don’t think you can swallow the whole piece.


 

The Playboy reporter pushes Gibson on accusations that he’s a homophobe and misogynist. Gibson says he’s not and claims he just thinks some “modes of behavior [are] unnatural.”

[Q] Playboy: You can use it on your critics, who have called you, among other things, homophobic, misogynistic―

[A] Gibson: Racist, bigoted, all sorts of things.

[Q] Playboy: Are you any of those things?

[A] Gibson: No, I’m not. I’m really not. I think if you suggest that you find some modes of behavior unnatural, then you become all those things. And you get vilified. It’s like having people holding signs and trying to spit on you.


 

Gibson is baffled by the fact that people think he’s offensive and reiterates that he’ll apologize “when hell freezes over.”

[Q] Playboy: Outside Mann’s Chinese Theater in Hollywood?

[A] Gibson: Yeah, that’s when I found out I was a misogynist, a bigot, a racist, a neo-Nazi and a homophobe. They had signs, they were screaming and frothing at the mouth, pure hatred. It was wild. People just looking for attention.

[Q] Playboy: That was a gay protest, right?

[A] Gibson: Yeah, totally whipped up from nowhere. I got up to the microphone to say something and it was, like, jeers. I decided to go up and look at the people to see who they were and why they were so angry.

[Q] Playboy: Do you know why they were angry with you?

[A] Gibson: It was over something I said five years ago in a Spanish interview, which was taken the wrong way. I don’t want to go into it again because it’s like igniting a fucking spark. I just don’t want it―I don’t want anyone writing to me or coming to my house. I don’t want any of that shit. Suffice it to say that I’ve been chased by automobiles doing dangerous things on the freeway. I’m not even comfortable with you printing this because there are certain organizations that like to breathe down my neck. I don’t give a fuck what they do so long as they keep it to themselves.

[Q] Playboy: But what did you say that so pissed them off?

[A] Gibson: Whatever it was I said, they found it offensive. The next day I was doing an interview on national television and was asked, “So, are you going to apologize? You’ve offended the community.” I said, “I’m not apologizing to anyone. I’ll apologize when hell freezes over. They can fuck off.” Then the war started. It’s made me totally paranoid. I’ve got to learn to keep my mouth shut.


 

Gibson says he wants to kill the writer of a negative, unauthorized biography about him and expresses his frustration with people who compare him to Hitler.

Gibson: I don’t think God will put him in my path. He deserves death. He attacked me at an elemental level. He attacked my wife, my family, my father, my whole being. He’s lucky he’s still walking. He’s getting to you in the most underhanded, nasty way, threatening everything you have, everything you are, saying that you’re a worthless piece of shit. And that the people who gave birth to you are scumbags and really nasty people. And everyone you’ve ever met or touched you trampled on and fucked over. And that you’re weird and warped and it’s like you are fucking Hitler. I’m Hitler and my dad is Mussolini!

 

But in 1995, Gibson moved on from his anger issues and doesn’t lose his temper anymore, at least according to him.

[Q] Playboy: The director of Maverick and Lethal Weapon, Richard Donner, has said that you have a lot of anger and hostility and that underneath, you’re a tough son of a bitch.

[A] Gibson: I don’t know. I get pretty dark sometimes, pretty bleak. But that passes. I rarely lose my temper anymore.

[Q] Playboy: Which means you have lost it in the past.

[A] Gibson: You’ve got to get it out. I used to just hang on to it and then some little thing would set it off, which was stupid. You behave like an asshole when you lose it, and you feel like an asshole afterward. It’s not healthy.


 

In conclusion, this quote seems like his life’s thesis ― a statement that is particularly relevant just days away from the 2016 election. Here, Gibson brags that people still flock to his movies despite everything he says and does:

[A] Gibson: No. I got whacked around for smoking, fighting, not following their stupid rules. I had a rough time. I’m not much of a conformist. I was known for being a bit of a clown. I remember my dad got me aside and said, “Just remember, everybody likes a clown, but nobody pays him.” I’ve often been tempted to call him and say, “Remember how you told me . . .?” “Yeah?” “Yes, they do.”

“Hacksaw Ridge” is now in a theater near you.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 14 hours ago.

Election 2016: A supremely important decision

$
0
0
Irondale, Ala., Nov 4, 2016 / 11:51 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Among the first acts of the next president of the United States will be the appointment of a new justice for the U.S. Supreme Court, comprised currently of eight members since the February death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.

In the short term, the new president will appoint Scalia’s successor — someone who will be a deciding factor in whether Catholic entities like EWTN and the Little Sisters of the Poor should be forced by the federal government to violate their religious beliefs by providing contraception and abortifacient drugs in their health insurance plans. The new justice will also help decide whether or not a Virginia girl, who now identifies as a boy, should be allowed access to the restroom that corresponds with her self-chosen sexual identity.

We have already witnessed the Supreme Court redefine marriage. With another liberal activist on board, we will witness the court redefine discrimination to include sexual identity. No doubt, we will also see the court continue down the path of further chipping away at our constitutional rights to religious liberty, freedom of expression and so much more.

In the long term, there perhaps will be no other more important decision made by our next president than who will be nominated to the Supreme Court. A new president with a pro-life commitment will be able to shape the future of a court that will help the United States avoid the disaster of this culture of narcissism and death and move toward one that more resembles what the Founding Fathers established. On the other hand, a new president with the opposite agenda will continue to perilously lead the United States along a path that cheapens life and demeans and threatens people of faith.

In the last of the presidential debates, both candidates made it abundantly clear where they stand on the issue of respect for life.

As we step into the voting booth on Tuesday, we are faced with a supremely important decision. Let us be clear in making that decision — there is no issue more important than respect for the dignity of human life.

May God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. Reported by CNA 14 hours ago.

Obamacare Is Raising Premiums And Lowering Employment

$
0
0
Obamacare Is Raising Premiums And Lowering Employment Submitted by Hans Bader via The Foundation for Economic Education,

*Health care insurance premiums will increase significantly next year as a result of the Affordable Care Act, and many consumers will be left with access to only a single insurance provider, according to administration officials. *Arizona will see the biggest spike in prices (a whopping 116 percent), while Oklahoma will see a spike of 69 percent and Tennessee, Minnesota, and Alabama will see spikes of around 60 percent. The national average will be about 25 percent, the administration says.

Columnist Mary Katharine Ham wrote recently about how “My Defective Obamacare Health Insurance Product Just Blew Up.” Last year, her insurance plan’s cost went up by almost 60 percent. The plan had been purchased on the Affordable Care Act “marketplace.” This year, things got much worse:



*My premium is going up 96 percent. Ninety-six percent. My monthly payment, which was the amount of a decent car payment, is now the size of a moderate mortgage. *The president refers to these for thousands of citizens as “a few bugs” when to us it feels like a flameout.

 

For this astronomical payment, I get a plan with an astronomical deductible that my healthy family of three will likely never hit except in the most catastrophic of circumstances.



Before Obamacare, she, like many other people, had a better plan at a lower price: 



During the run-up to Obamacare, President Obama referred to these plans as “junk” plans, but my family and I received perfectly good care and service through them. We were responsible, healthy citizens consuming a small amount of health care, paying out of pocket for most of it, and making sure we weren’t deadbeats should something catastrophic come to pass. Our health insurance was a rational and responsible purchase.



*But thanks to Obamacare, that plan no longer exists, even though Obama got Congress to approve Obamacare by falsely claiming that “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” *(A claim that even biased left-leaning fact-checker PolitiFact later called the “lie of the year.”)

As Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute noted in the Chicago Tribune:



Obamacare inflation impacts everyone. August saw the biggest monthly gain in prices for medicine, doctor appointments, and health insurance since 1984 ... The average employer-sponsored family policy now costs more than $18,000 a year.

 

That means family coverage costs $4,400 more today than before the health law passed in 2010. So much for President Barack Obama's promise families would save $2,500 a year.

 

Further, the Government Accountability Office found the Obamacare website is a magnet for fraud. The office created 14 fictitious enrollees who were approved for $60,000 in health insurance subsidies.



*Turner argues that an expansion of Obamacare recently suggested by Hillary Clinton would “double down” on its failures, replicating on a much larger scale the flaws of the health insurance cooperatives created by the Affordable Care Act. *According to Turner, the co-op program cost taxpayers $2.4 billion, but 17 of the 23 state co-ops have failed.

*Obamacare has already reduced employment in most states by between 1.5% and 3%, according to Georgetown University’s Tomas Wind.* The law will slow economic growth over the next decade, costing the nation about 2.3 million jobs and contributing to a $1 trillion increase in projected deficits, the Congressional Budget Office said in a report released in 2014. Reported by Zero Hedge 10 hours ago.

Bay Area small business squeezed by increased healthcare costs

$
0
0
Much of the attention on higher health insurance costs has been focused on Affordable Care Act marketplaces, which are seeing double-digit increases nationwide. But what about the 45 percent of state residents who get their insurance through their employer? While it’s true that premium rate increases since the advent of Obamacare have remained low in employer-funded health plans, that doesn’t mean they’re immune to market pressures pushing up health care costs and many businesses have turned… Reported by bizjournals 9 hours ago.

Here's a novel way to fund health insurance: Revenue bonds

$
0
0
The most important health policy change of the last 50 years, the Affordable Care Act —Obamacare — is imploding. The election campaign staked out two opposing perspectives: those who consider it repairable, and those who think it should be scrapped. We will not add our voices to this hoary debate. Instead, we propose a completely different approach. If you would like to submit a guest column on a health-related topic, contact Elizabeth Hayes at ehayes@bizjournals.com Our proposal is not… Reported by bizjournals 9 hours ago.

Health Care Is Unaffordable Even With Obamacare Coverage

$
0
0
While Obamacare has brought health insurance to millions of people in the U.S., some in the program are finding that the medical care they need is too expensive to actually use. Reported by Newsmax 10 hours ago.

Feds approve health care waiver saving state $1B annually

$
0
0
Massachusetts has received a federal waiver for its healthcare system that will save the state from losing $1 billion a year. The waiver allows the state’s health insurance program, MassHealth, to operate differently than in other parts of the country. The state has gotten the waiver numerous times over the last 20 years, and the previous one was set to expire on June 30, 2017, putting $1 billion of annual federal funding at risk. MassHealth largely offers health insurance to low-income residents,… Reported by bizjournals 10 hours ago.

Please Protect My Marriage: Vote For Hillary

$
0
0
Marriage Equality has changed my life. And it's on the ballot.

When I was in college I met my first love in Paris and he moved to Boston to be with me. It was a nightmare because he couldn't work, we constantly struggled with visa issues, and with time, it was too much to handle and we separated, young hearts broken. I swore no more international boyfriends! Of course, I met a guy from Montreal and that too ended, but years ago.

And then I met Giovanni. I was much older and long-single, so I didn't say no. And at first, it was casual and I didn't really think about him being Colombian. I first really felt it when I went to Africa and he stood by me every day from home, but he couldn't come to my graduation. He couldn't fly or leave the country.

I came back and we moved in together. I started to see him talk to his family back home, and hear how being apart for 17 years broke his heart, especially when his dad got sick. His pain was too much to bear. So for him, for us, I took on marriage equality in NYC.

My focus was on the Equality Bill - but I was determined to free him, so I added this to my plate. I took on immigration reform too. We had two pathways to freedom from DOMA. The Supreme Court. Or Congress via Comprehensive Immigration Reform. I couldn't affect SCOTUS, although I did resort to prayer, organizing a sunrise prayer service in D.C. the morning of the hearings.

But I worked deep in the trenches in immigration reform. There I learned that straight immigrants suffer the same horrible fear and closet that gay people do. Who knew. And bringing gay relationships in to that forum with the Catholic Church & Evangelicals in the room was hard stuff.

Fortunately, the SCOTUS came through on Wednesday, June 26, 2013. And on the following Sunday, NYC Pride Day, Giovanni and I got married and paraded down 5th Avenue with the sign "Just Married Today" -- as the liberation joy of millions poured forth. It was incredible and our faces hurt from smiling.

Then came the immigration process, extremely stressful and frightening as we revealed our lives. But we got through that process. And the boot lifted. He flew home finally. Although we were afraid he might not actually get back in. He flew home again. Okay. Relief. We got his social security number - a huge deal. Health insurance. He could join our apartment lease. We finally got on a plane together and had our honeymoon in his country.

But most of all we were free. Free from watching other people get married when we couldn't. Free from feeling like a second class citizen in my own country. Free from all the heart-wrenching stories from other bi-national couples with whom we are forever bonded.

Amidst all of this, there was one incredibly painful and also happy day I've not talked about.

Two years before DOMA was overturned we won Marriage Equality in NY. Soon there was a big gay wedding day at the marriage bureau when they opened just for us on a Sunday to issue licenses. Seeing all the couples together was incredible. Marriage ceremonies going on all over. Old, young, all colors. Our tribe was on parade and it was beautiful.

But I almost didn't go down because my heart was so heavy. We could still not marry. DOMA remained. Our suffering remained. And a huge battle loomed still ahead, an overwhelming battle in Congress or the Supreme Court to overturn DOMA - a tall order.

But it's gone now. DOMA is dead. We're free & equal. And Hillary will make sure the SCOTUS keeps it that way.

Please protect our "hard fought, hard won" progress, as Hillary rightfully calls it. Protect Marriage Equality. Protect my marriage. My husband. Our lives and freedom depend upon it.

#ForwardTogether #ProtectOurProgress #Hillary4President2016 #VoteEQUALITY

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Get care for your pets that won’t break the bank

$
0
0
Give useful advice on preventing diseases, warning signs, and treatments you can administer on your own? To help pet owners find a veterinarian who provides the care and service at reasonable prices, Bay Area Consumers’ Checkbook and Checkbook.org evaluated local veterinary clinics and hospitals Veterinary hospitals can become accredited by the American Animal Hospital Association by meeting certain minimum standards: maintaining adequate medical records and providing complete diagnostic, pharmacy, anesthetic, surgical, nursing, dental, and emergency service facilities. The most common complaints Checkbook receives from vet customers concern excessive and unexpectedly high bills. Many commented that vets not only failed to consider and discuss lower-cost treatment alternatives, but also pushed costly treatments of little value to the pet and owner. Because veterinary treatment can be expensive, many people buy health insurance for their pets. Checkbook advises against purchasing insurance unless you need to protect yourself from expenses that would seriously disrupt your finances. Buying insurance to cover non-catastrophic expenses means you pay to cover the profit, sales costs and administrative costs for an insurance company to process bills you could pay yourself. Red flags are large co-pays; high premiums; and limitations or exclusions for conditions that might require costly care (such as cancer) or chronic conditions that require continual care. If the plan has a fee schedule, print it out and ask your vet to compare his or her fees to the insurance plan’s allowances. The Chronicle is partnering with Bay Area Consumers’ Checkbook magazine and Checkbook.org, a nonprofit consumer group with a mission to help consumers get the best service and lowest prices. Reported by SFGate 8 hours ago.

The high costs of not offering paid sick leave

$
0
0
A study by Philip Susser, now a medical student, and Nicolas Ziebarth, a Cornell economist, backs up Chipotle’s theory that paid sick leave could reduce the spread of contagion. According to the study, published in Health Affairs, 65 percent of families with incomes below $35,000 had no paid sick leave, while the same was true of only 25 percent of families with annual incomes above $100,000. States and cities that require employers to offer paid sick leave — such as California in general, and San Francisco in particular — have fewer cases of seasonal flu than comparable cities and states. According to one estimate, an additional 7 million people contracted the H1N1 flu virus in 2009 because employees came to work while infected. Workers lacking paid sick leave are more likely to delay needed medical care, a finding that holds for both insured and uninsured workers. In other words, though health insurance helps people pay for health care, it does nothing to help them afford to take time off to get it. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, enacted in 1993, employers with more than 50 workers must offer 12 weeks of leave within a 12-month period, but it is unpaid. Because of a new Obama administration rule, an estimated 300,000 private-sector employees working on government contracts will get paid sick leave starting Jan. 1. The ability to see a doctor or a nurse outside of business hours — for example, via telemedicine or at a health clinic at a drugstore or other retail location — can also improve access to care. Reported by SFGate 7 hours ago.

United States: Small And Narrow: Health Insurance Changes - Brown Smith Wallace

$
0
0
While the number of uninsured persons has dropped in the past five years, the implementation of the Affordable Care Act has not been an easy one. Karen Stern, Partner in Charge of the Entrepreneurial Services Group, discusses some issues small employers are facing, in this month's "Financial Fitness," as featured in Small Business Monthly Reported by Mondaq 20 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images