Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

The Downside of High Deductible Health Insurance

$
0
0
*The Downside of High Deductible Health Insurance *

High deductible health insurance plans were supposed to help consumers cut healthcare costs. The idea was that since consumers would have to pay a large chunk of their own money for medical care before insurance kicks in, they would shop around to get the best prices.

But it hasn’t turned out that way. According to a research paper published earlier in February in JAMA Internal Medicine, people in high deductible health insurance plans are no more likely than those with traditional health insurance to look for more affordable care.

The study, conducted by researchers at Harvard University and University of Southern California, surveyed 2,000 people. About half had high deductibles—more than $1,250 for an individual and $2,500 for a family. While the majority of people surveyed said they were worried about costs, just 4 percent of those in high deductible health insurance plans said they compared prices the last time they had medical treatment, versus just slightly more than the 3 percent of those in plans with low deductibles. Not a big difference.

"Simply increasing a deductible, which gives enrollees skin in the game, appears insufficient to facilitate price shopping," the study concludes. 

Even more worrisome is research that shows that some workers with high deductible health insurance plans aren’t getting the care they need. According a National Bureau of Economic Research paper published in October 2014, researchers tracked workers at one company that moved all its workers from a plan with no deductible to one with a family deductible of $3,000 to $4,000. While average yearly spending per employee fell 13 percent, it was nearly all due to a reduction in demand for services. Workers just skipped healthcare altogether, even for preventative services that were free, such as colonoscopies and mammograms. 

“People don’t know what (exams) are necessary or unnecessary," says Peter Ubel, a professor of business and medicine at Duke University. “The attitude is that the doctor knows best.”

Those who do try to reduce their costs report little success. A January 2016 report by the Kaiser Family Foundation and New York Times found that consumers who have difficulty paying their medical bills are more likely to try to compare costs or negotiate prices for medical treatment. But 69 percent of people struggling with medical bills say it was difficult to find out how much they would have to pay and 67 percent of those who tried to negotiate with a provider were unsuccessful. 

Despite these trends, employers are increasingly offering high deductible health insurance plans to their employees. This year, 86 percent of employers will offer high deductible plans as an option, up from 54 percent five years ago, according to Towers Watson, an employee benefits consulting firm. Employees who like the prospect of paying lower premiums are increasingly opting for those plans. Enrollment has more than doubled from 20 percent to 43 percent over the past five years. 

That trend is likely to continue. At about one-quarter of all companies, high deductible plans are the only option. And according to a PwC Health and Well-Being Touchstone Survey, 37 percent of companies are considering making it the only choice within the next three years.

*What You Should Do*

Deciding whether to get high deductible insurance requires some consideration. It starts with choosing your health insurance wisely, says Ubel. Talk to the benefits experts within your company or if you’re buying on your own, use an independent insurance broker. If you have a chronic condition or anticipate major medical care in the next year—say a knee placement—a high deductible health insurance plan may not be right for you.

Understand what your existing plan covers and take advantage of free preventative services such as annual check ups, colonoscopies and mammograms. One positive trend for consumers: More insurers provide pricing tools on their websites that make it easier to compare costs within your network. You can also check out price shopping sites such as Healthcare Bluebook or Guroo from the Health Care Cost Institute.

Keep in mind that if you skip or put off care you need, that could end up costing you and the health system more in the long run. 

*Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2016 Consumers Union of U.S.*

*Subscribe now!*
Subscribe to *ConsumerReports.org* for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
--------------------
Update your feed preferences
   
   
   
   
    Reported by Consumer Reports 23 hours ago.

California church fights back against mandatory abortion funding

$
0
0
Washington D.C., Feb 18, 2016 / 12:37 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A California church is challenging a state mandate that requires elective abortion coverage in its health insurance plans.

The church’s pastor objects that the mandate violates religious freedom and treats the killing of innocent human life as health care.

“We are standing against the government’s imposed evil to participate in the killing of innocent babies through our health insurance plans,” Jim Garlow, senior pastor at Skyline Wesleyan Church in La Mesa, Calif., told CNA. “This is unacceptable and goes against the very fiber of our Christian beliefs.”

Pastor Garlow has been a pastor at the church for more than 20 years.

“The government has no right to dictate anything that violates our conscience or our beliefs,” he said.

“Our Founding Fathers established constitutional freedoms so that individuals can express their religious beliefs in the public square. They also wanted to ensure that the government could not intrude in the deeply held convictions of all Americans or of any church.”

In August 2014, California’s Department of Managed Health Care sent a letter to seven insurance companies stating that they are required to include elective abortions in their health plans, with no religious exceptions.

The letter was in response to actions from two Catholic universities, Santa Clara University and Loyola Marymount University. They chose to exclude elective abortion from their employee insurance policies because of their opposition to abortion.

Last week, Skyline Wesleyan Church filed a lawsuit against the health care department. The church charged it was being forced to comply with the mandate and violate its religious beliefs.

Garlow’s pro-life convictions are deeply rooted in his Christian faith and in his family. He has four adopted children. His oldest adopted daughter, Janie, was born from a gang rape.

He recounted his daughter’s testimony at a public hearing opposing a county hospital’s decision to start performing abortions. Janie, then 12 years old, said, “I may have been an unwanted pregnancy, but I am a wanted child.”

Garlow said this helped inspire him to stand up for his convictions.

“Janie stood up for truth that day and as followers of Christ, we are called to stand for truth,” Garlow said. “Skyline Wesleyan Church believes in standing up for biblical truth. This is part of our DNA.”

According to California’s health care department, elective abortions constitute “basic health care” and are on an equal footing with all other maternity services. Its August 2014 letter claimed the mandate is supported by California law.

A 1975 state health care law and the California constitution, it said, prohibits health plans “from discriminating against women who choose to terminate a pregnancy.”

“Thus, all health plans must treat maternity services and legal abortion neutrally,” the letter stated.

Garlow said he disagrees with the state’s definition of health care.

“The Department of Managed Health Care believes providing elective abortions is part of basic health care. They couldn’t be further from the truth,” Garlow said.

“When my wife battled cancer, her treatments were legitimate and necessary for health care. Violently ripping an innocent child from its mother’s womb is not health care – but the exact opposite,” he said.

“Killing innocent life is destructive and can never be considered a health benefit,” Garlow emphasized.

The health care department established the mandate without any public comment or notice, the process normally required by California law.

Erik Stanley, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, represents Skyline Wesleyan Church in the lawsuit. He charged that the department avoided this process because it knew it would not get public approval if it followed legal protocol.

“The department went about this the wrong way and did not use the proper public regulation process,” Stanley told CNA. “They rammed this through because they knew there would be public outcry – especially among religious organizations and churches.”

Stanley charged that the action is government overreach that threatens the religious integrity of churches.

“The government has no business requiring churches to go against their sincerely held beliefs and participate in the killing of innocent human life by providing elective abortion in their health insurance plans,” he said.

“Not only is this unprecedented, it is unconstitutional and goes against California law,” Stanley said.  

Alliance Defending Freedom also represents three other California churches in a similar federal lawsuit filed last year.

Skyline Wesleyan Church is standing by Garlow and the lawsuit. William Gifley, senior vice chairman of the board for the church for the past 13 years, said there is a lot at stake.

“The basic fundamental right to freely exercise our faith and our religion is at stake,” Gifley told CNA. “This is a violation of the religious freedom of churches.”

“It is unconscionable for the government to presume to tell people of faith and churches how their insurance dollars should be spent,” he said.

“Forcing payment of abortion is wrong. Life begins at conception and this is a sacred line that the government should never cross.”

Garlow agreed. He said adoption is a viable alternative for women with unwanted pregnancies.

“As a father of four beautiful adopted children, I cannot say how proud I am of these women who chose not to violently end the lives of these innocent children in their womb,” he said. “That took courage and sacrifice. And if they had not done that, my wife and I would not have been able to raise these amazing gifts of God.”

The pastor said the government needs to redirect its efforts.

“There are several million people longing to adopt a child, and yet here we have a government that is coercing its citizenry to participate in the killing of innocent life – life that is so coveted by God and by individuals who want the opportunity to love and raise these children like my wife and I did,” Garlow said.

“The government should spend more time encouraging adoption rather than coercing churches to participate in abortion.”Photo credit: Minutius Hora via www.shutterstock.com Reported by CNA 23 hours ago.

Honest Dollar and Payable Partner to Automate Retirement Savings for 1099 Workers

$
0
0
Seventy percent of self-employed Americans aren’t saving on a regular basis for retirement. Honest Dollar and Payable now automate retirement saving for contractors to reverse this trend.

Austin, Texas (PRWEB) February 18, 2016

Honest Dollar, a retirement benefits provider dedicated to helping independent contractors save for retirement, announced today that it has partnered with Payable, the leading 1099 payments and taxes platform. The partnership furthers Honest Dollar’s mission of providing 1099 workers access to retirement savings with the same ease and regularity as employer-sponsored retirement plans.

According to recent data released by Ameritrade, 70 percent of self-employed Americans don’t regularly save for retirement and 28 percent don’t save at all. Self-employed and 1099 contractors face more economic uncertainty than salaried W-2 workers. From managing irregular income and quarterly taxes to navigating benefits like health insurance and retirement, independent workers are left to handle complex financial necessities on their own.

Honest Dollar and Payable empower contractors with an easy, portable, and affordable way to save for the future. Starting today, the self-employed and 1099 contractors who are paid by companies using the Payable solution can find the best retirement options for their needs -- either a Roth IRA or SEP IRA -- and automate the amount they put aside each month. The service is offered at a discount to Payable users, with plans available for $4 a month.

Now, contractors can get covered with health insurance, dental insurance, and retirement savings directly from Payable.

“With this partnership, we remove another financial uncertainty for independent workers — portable retirement plans,” said Tad Milbourn, Payable CEO. “Ultimately, we want to make working for yourself the obvious choice, not the riskiest one.”

whurley, CEO of Honest Dollar, noted that the partnership with Payable is another powerful way the company is striving “to meet the unique needs of independent contractors and, just as importantly, small businesses. By partnering with Payable, we are offering employers a single source solution for scaling their businesses.”

About Honest Dollar
Honest Dollar develops financial products for underserved audiences that work for everyone: employee, employer, and the economy. Honest Dollar’s mission is to remove the barriers associated with setting up and maintaining retirement accounts for small businesses and self-employed individuals. Focusing primarily on IRAs rather than 401Ks, Honest Dollar offers retirement plans that benefit employees and freelancers with significantly lower fees. All Honest Dollar retirement plans feature funds professionally managed by Vanguard, the low cost investment giant.

About Payable
Payable strives to strengthen the 1099 workforce by creating an all-in-one platform for payments, taxes, and portable benefits for independent contractors. Since launching, the company has processed nearly a quarter billion in payments to independent contractors. Payable is backed by Redpoint Ventures, Freestyle Capital, Y-Combinator, and General Catalyst Partners, among others. Reported by PRWeb 21 hours ago.

ez1095 ACA Software Now Supports White Paper Printing For Forms 1095 C. 1094 C, 1095 B, and 1094 B

$
0
0
ez1095 Affordable Care Act form software now allows for white paper printing for both the IRS and recipient copies. Test drive for up to 30 days at http://www.halfpricesoft.com.

Pittsburgh, PA (PRWEB) February 18, 2016

ez1095 ACA form printing software from Halfpricesoft.com has been updated to allow printing on white paper for 1095C, 1094C, 1095B and 1094B for both the IRS and recipient copies. This will save employers and tremendous amount of time and money on forms and processing fees.

“ez1095 software will support white paper printing for the IRS and recipients on 1095-C, 1094-C, 1095-B and 1094-B forms.” said Dr. Ge, the founder of Halfpricesoft.com.

ez1095 software is compatible Windows 10, 8.1, 8, 7, Vista, XP and other Windows systems. Potential customers can download and try this software at no obligation by visiting http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/form-1095-software-free-download.asp

ez1095 ACA software application offers a print and efile version for customer accommodation. (Efile version is an additional cost). With the latest ACA guidelines for the healthcare law, employers that have 50 or more full-time team members or equivalents to file an annual return in 2016 reporting health insurance they offered employees.

ez1095 ACA form filling software offers business owners:· Prepare form 1095-B, 1094-B, 1095-C & 1094-C
· Print 1095-C or 1095-B paper forms for recipients
· Print paper form 1095-C & 1094-C or 1095-B & 1094-B forms for IRS
· PDF Print forms for recipients in digital format
· Fast data import feature
· Backup and restore feature included in cost
· eFile feature: generate XML document that customers can upload to IRS site. (The efile feature is approved by IRS.)
· Support correction forms
· Support unlimited accounts, recipients and ACA forms
· Access to free customer support

Priced at just $195 for a single user version, ($295 for new efile version) this ACA forms filing software saves employers time and money by processing forms, in-house. To learn more about ez1095 ACA software, customers can visit http://www.halfpricesoft.com/aca-1095/aca-1095-software.asp

About halfpricesoft.com
Founded in 2003, Halfpricesoft.com has established itself as a leader in meeting the software needs of small businesses around the world with its payroll software, employee attendance tracking software, check printing software, W2 software, 1099 software and barcode generating software. It continues to grow with its philosophy that small business owners need affordable, user friendly, super simple, and totally risk-free software. Reported by PRWeb 20 hours ago.

maurices Announces Second Tenant for New Headquarters Building

$
0
0
maurices Announces Second Tenant for New Headquarters Building DULUTH, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--maurices announced today that it has secured a second tenant for its new maurices Headquarters building, located at 425 West Superior Street in downtown Duluth. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (Blue Cross) will open a new retail location offering personalized health insurance support and will occupy nearly 5,000 square-feet. The new maurices headquarters is on track to open on April 25, 2016 providing a new home to its 450 corporate office employees locat Reported by Business Wire 17 hours ago.

How Wearables Are Trying to Revolutionize Healthcare

$
0
0
Fitbits collect a treasure trove of personal health data about their users -- the kind of information health insurance providers would love to get their hands on. Reported by Motley Fool 15 hours ago.

Disparities found to affect survival for older children, adolescents and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia

$
0
0
New study from the Cancer Prevention Institute of California finds lower survival rate for blacks and those treated at centers not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute.

Fremont, CA (PRWEB) February 18, 2016

Acute leukemia is the leading cause of cancer death among patients 39 years of age and younger. Without treatment, most patients die within months, if not weeks, of diagnosis. The five-year survival was only about 50% for the most recent treatment period of 2004 – 2011.

In a study led by the Cancer Prevention Institute of California(CPIC) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and published in the February issue of the British Journal of Hematology, researchers analyzed 3,935 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) up to 39 years of age in California from 1988 – 2011.

For this study researchers used data from the California Cancer Registry, which participates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first population-based study that simultaneously examined the influence of race/ethnicity, neighborhood socioeconomic status, type of health insurance and treatment facility on survival.

Researchers found several subgroups of patients with worse survival. They tended to fall into one of these groups:·     age group (10 – 39 years)
·     lower neighborhood socioeconomic status
·     black race/ethnicity
·     receipt of initial care in hospitals not affiliated with the NCI
·     lack of health insurance

The diagnosis of AML in older children, adolescents and young adults may require more intensive treatment, which may lead to a higher probability of treatment-related complications. Older children, adolescents and young adults are also less likely to participate in clinical trials and more likely to receive treatment at hospitals not affiliated with the NCI in comparison to younger children.

A significant association was found between lower socioeconomic neighborhoods and early death suggesting that these patients lacked access to optimal treatments during the critical days after initial diagnosis.

It is not clear what factors accounted for the disparities in survival among black patients. Researchers speculate that genetics may contribute to the difference in chemotherapy response or that black patients had less access to chemotherapy and other treatments such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Recent studies have also shown the biology of pediatric AML differs from adult AML which may lead to a favorable prognosis in younger patients.

Researchers also found evidence of increased early death and lower survival among uninsured patients compared to privately or publicly insured patients. Health insurance information was available in the California Cancer Registry for patients diagnosed from 1996 – 2011.

“Our study reveals that survival inequalities persist among vulnerable patients with acute myeloid leukemia such as the uninsured, those of black race/ethnicity and adolescents and young adults.” said Renata Abrahão MD, MSc, a visiting research scientist at CPIC and lead author of the study. “This study can serve as a baseline to compare changes in survival that may result from potential improvements in health insurance coverage following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”

“Moreover, this study showed that survival after AML remains low among young patients and highlights the need for new therapeutic regimens to treat this disease with various subtypes. We emphasized the importance of linking population-based data with genetic and clinical information contained in the patients’ medical records in order to better understand the causes of survival inequalities.”

The work was supported by Children with Cancer UK.

Authors include: Renata Abrahão of the Cancer Prevention Institute of California and the Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Ruth Keogh of the Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Daphne Lichtensztajn of the Cancer Prevention Institute of California; Rafael Marcos-Gragera of the Epidemiology Unity and Cancer Registry of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute; Bruno Medeiros of the Division of Hematology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Michel Coleman of the Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Raul Ribeiro of the Department of Oncology, Leukemia and Lymphoma Division, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, and Theresa H.M. Keegan in the Division of Hematology and Oncology at the University of California, Davis.

About the Cancer Prevention Institute of California
The Cancer Prevention Institute of California is the nation’s premier organization dedicated to preventing cancer and to reducing its burden where it cannot yet be prevented. CPIC tracks patterns of cancer throughout the entire population and identifies those at risk for developing cancer. Its research scientists are leaders in investigating the causes of cancer in large populations to advance the development of prevention-focused interventions. CPIC’s innovative cancer prevention research and education programs, together with the work of the Stanford Cancer Institute, can make our vision of a world without cancer a reality. For more information, visit CPIC’s official website at http://www.cpic.org. Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

A Bernie Sanders Presidency Could Revolutionize Bipartisanship

$
0
0
Conventional wisdom dictates that should Bernie Sanders overcome all electoral hindrances and assume the presidency, much of his agenda would not get through the U.S. Congress. Since Sanders comes from the left wing of the political spectrum, it would be nearly impossible for him to persuade moderate Republicans to vote for his proposals.

Traditionally, presidents shepherd legislation through the Congress by consolidating the votes of members from their own party, then by siphoning off the votes of enough moderates from the opposing party to get legislation passed. This is how Lyndon B. Johnson got Medicare through in 1965, how Ronald Reagan pushed his tax cut proposal through in 1981, and how George H.W. Bush won approval for the the Persian Gulf War Resolution in 1991.

Along these lines, many of Sanders's major proposals would have a near impossible chance of passing without major changes to temporize the legislation. The Republicans are likely to maintain control of the House, and while there is an outside chance they could lose the Senate, the chances are de minimus that the Democrats will hold a 60-vote filibuster-proof majority.

Sanders's flagship legislative proposal to establish a single-payer health care system would not likely garner a solitary Republican vote in Congress. There are no longer any liberal Republicans in either chamber. The most moderate Republicans, like U.S. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) and U.S. Representative Mike Turner (R-OH) voted against the Affordable Care Act in 2010, and would have no incentive to go a step further to support a not-for-profit healthcare system.

Any Republican who defected and supported the Sanders Plan would likely suffer recriminations by losing his/her seat on a prominent committee, by losing funding for a project in his/her state or Congressional District, or by facing a redoubtable primary challenger when he/she is up for re-election.

Even if the Democrats did win supermajorities in both houses, moderate Democrats, especially those with constituents who work in the health insurance industry, would not likely support the Sanders proposal.

That being said, on many other issues, a Sanders administration would have the opportunity to revolutionize bipartisanship. Instead of working through the center, Sanders could effectuate coalitions of the progressive left and the Tea Party Right. The opposition would come from the center-left and from the center-right in both parties. American politics is not a continuum but a circle. There is a point where Ralph Nader's bicycle crashes into Pat Buchanan's Mercedes. This is the point Sanders would have to work from for legislative achievement.

Sanders calls for a truncation of the U.S. military budget. He has voted against the Defense Authorization Act in 2012, 2014, and in 2015. Sanders often highlights the fact that the U.S. spends more on Defense than the next seven countries combined.

Cutting the Defense budget has support on the far left, as well as on the far right. While many establishment Republicans and GOP Presidential candidates continue to call for increases in the military budget, they are often at odds with consistently fiscally conservative Tea Party members who call for across the board cuts in federal spending and they make no exception for the military budget.

U.S. Representative Mike Mulvaney (R-SC) is one of the most conservative members of the Congress. On the issue of military spending, Mulvaney found common ground with one of the Chamber's most liberal members, U.S. Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) in 2012 in supporting a freeze in military spending. Mulvaney could be Sanders' pointman in securing GOP votes to freeze or cut military spending. In addition, conservative U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) could be a partner with Sanders. He is a perpetual critic of government waste at the Pentagon. Grassley once complained to Presidential Ronald Reagan: "It's great that you are going after the welfare queens, Mr. President. But when are you going to go after the welfare queens in the Pentagon?"

Another issue where Sanders could consolidate a left-right coalition is on the war on drugs. Sanders, like most Congressional progressives, favors the decriminalization of marijuana and maintains: "Nonviolent offenders should not be incarcerated." Many small government conservatives concur with Sanders that the federal government has no business in punishing non-violent drug offenders.

The legalization of marijuana would not be done as part of an all-encompassing legislative process. It would have to be a gradual process. The first step would be to legalize medical marijuana. A vociferous proponent in this effort is conservative U.S. Representative Scott Perry (R-PA). Perry introduced legislation legalizing medical marijuana to help kids with Epilepsy and seizure disorders. In addition, conservative U.S. Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) is a cheerleader for marijuana legalization, averring: "The marijuana laws have been used to expand the power of government over people's lives more than just anything else I can think of." When asked if he ever smoked marijuana, Rohrabacher opined that he did: "Everything but drink the bong water." (The fluid used in a water pipe)

Along these same lines, Sanders might be able to get landmark legislation passed which would end mandatory minimum prison sentences and give judges greater discretion over drug-related crimes. The Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act has earned the support form conservative Republicans like U.S. Senators like Mike Lee of Utah and liberal Democratic like Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

Sanders has galvanized a groundswell of grassroots support for his call to "break up the largest financial institutions in the country." Here again, Sanders could assemble a right-left coalition. Sanders would work to reinstate the parts of the Glass-Steagall Act repealed by Bill Clinton in 1999, which eliminated a wall of separation between commercial and investment banking. One of the most conservative Republican Senators, Mike Lee of Utah, claims that repeal of this part of the law "probably led to our economic meltdown." Lee supports reestablishing the provision.

There are other issues where Sanders could lead a left-right bipartisan coalition as well, letting the charter for the Export-Import Bank expire. The bank gives credit to U.S. exporters and foreign importers. Much of the funds are awarded to opulent corporations. Sanders brands the bank "an outrageous example of corporate welfare." Sanders could also work with Republican U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) (assuming Paul wins re-election) on this. Paul labels loans provided by the bank: "crony capitalism."

Finally, Sanders could work with a right-left coalition to retrench the size and scope of federal government surveillance activities. Both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama supported the National Security Agency Surveillance Program. The program's critics include conservative U.S. Representative Justin Amash (R-MI) and his liberal House colleague John Conyers (D-MI).

While the Sanders single-payer healthcare plan would likely be dead on arrival, a Sanders presidency could revolutionize the concept of bipartisanship on other issues. Sanders would have to consolidate his progressive base, and then reach way across the aisle to the most conservative members of the Congress. They would have to lay their difference aside and work together on the issues where they agree. The opposition to most of these proposals would come from the center-right and center-left establishments of both parties. Nevertheless, A Sanders presidency is reminiscent of the perennial quote by Ninetieth Century novelist Charles Dudley Warner: "Politics makes strange bedfellows."

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 12 hours ago.

Madison First Selectman Proposes New Measure to Help Keep Tax Rate Flat

$
0
0
Madison First Selectman Proposes New Measure to Help Keep Tax Rate Flat Patch Madison, CT -- The proposal drew debate at a recent meeting. Health insurance costs are skyrocketing next year also impacting the budget. Reported by Patch 12 hours ago.

EWTN disappointed but hopeful after latest HHS mandate ruling

$
0
0
Washington D.C., Feb 18, 2016 / 02:36 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In a 2-1 decision delivered Feb. 18, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against the Eternal Word Television Network (EWTN) in its challenge to the federal contraception mandate.

“We are disappointed in the Court’s refusal to protect our religious freedom,” EWTN chairman and CEO Michael Warsaw said.

“We simply want to continue to practice the same faith we preach to the world every day,” he said in a Feb. 18 statement. “We are prayerful and hopeful that, if necessary, the Supreme Court will correct this critical error.”

EWTN Global Catholic Network was founded by Mother Angelica, a Franciscan nun. Its purpose is to share the Catholic faith across the globe. Reaching over 250 million homes in 144 different countries, it is the largest religious media network in the world and is among hundreds of organizations to challenge the Department of Health and Human Services mandate.

The mandate requires employers to offer health insurance plans covering contraception, sterilization and some drugs that can cause early abortions.

Employers who fail to comply with the mandate face crippling penalties. Many Catholic and non-Catholic organizations have filed lawsuits against the mandate, saying it violates religious freedom and compels them to act against their religious and moral beliefs.

In its decision, the federal court said, “We accept the plaintiffs’ sincere belief . . . that the accommodation puts them to a choice between honoring their religious beliefs and facing significant penalties. We nonetheless conclude that the accommodation imposes no substantial burden.”

The dissenting opinion in the case argued that the majority ruling “runs roughshod over the sincerely held religious objections of Eternal Word Television Network,” and threatens core religious freedom legislation.  

Directly after delivering its ruling, the court placed its effects on hold until the Supreme Court rules on the mandate later this year. This protects EWTN from accumulating fines while waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision.

Lori Windham, senior counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and lead attorney on the case, said that the federal court’s decision “is wrong.”

“Rather than provide these drugs and devices through its own exchanges, our government wants to punish EWTN for practicing its faith,” she said.

“This 2-1 decision is not the end. The government's unconstitutional mandate has lost repeatedly at the Supreme Court, and we believe it will lose again.”

On Nov. 6, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear several remaining legal challenges to the mandate, including plaintiffs like Bishop David A. Zubik of Pittsburgh and the Little Sisters of the Poor.

For failing to comply with the mandate, EWTN said it could face fines of $35,000 per day, about $12.7 million per year. Its amicus curiae, or “friend of the court,” brief charged that the government aims to force EWTN into “complicity with wrongdoing.”

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby, a closely-held private company whose Christian owners objected to parts of the mandate. Its ruling on the non-profit challenges to the mandate is expect this summer.

  Reported by CNA 9 hours ago.

Health insurer required to cover exoskeleton for mobility-challenged patient

$
0
0
Health insurer required to cover exoskeleton for mobility-challenged patient Mobility in America just took a big step forward. In a landmark decision, a medical review board has ruled that a health insurance company must pay for a patient's ReWalk exoskeleton. Reported by Digital Trends 9 hours ago.

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick Attorney Earns International Client Service Accolade

$
0
0
Health law attorney Erin Smith Aebel, from the full-service business law firm Shumaker, Loop and Kendrick, LLP was awarded a 2016 Lexology Client Choice award in London last week for exemplary client service.

TAMPA, Fla. (PRWEB) February 18, 2016

Health law attorney Erin Smith Aebel, from the full-service business law firm Shumaker, Loop and Kendrick, LLP, was awarded a 2016 Lexology Client Choice award in London last week for exemplary client service.

Aebel was nominated by a client to receive the award, which is given annually to the best legal service providers around the world. She was the exclusive winner for the state of Florida in the Healthcare and Life Sciences category, and she is the only Shumaker attorney to have received the honor.

“All lawyers are expected to perform excellent legal services, but client service is what sets you apart,” Aebel said. “It’s a clear differentiator. I take client service very seriously.”

She and her fellow awardees were chosen from a pool of more than 2,000 attorneys. Aebel spoke with other winners and was presented with her award last week at a celebratory gala at the famed One Great George Street across from the Houses of Parliament.

“I had the wonderful opportunity to meet lawyers from around the world, so now when I have a client who needs a lawyer outside of the U.S., I can refer them to a firm that I know provides excellent customer service,” Aebel said.

About Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP is a full-service business law firm with more than 245 lawyers, 60 paralegals and 500 employees in five offices: Toledo and Columbus, Ohio; Tampa and Sarasota, Fla.; and Charlotte, N.C. In each of its markets, Shumaker is the premier provider of quality legal services to individuals, small businesses, healthcare providers, nonprofits and Fortune 500 and international corporations. Whether it's commitment to clients or work in the community, involvement lies at the core of all Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick’s initiatives. For more information, call 813-229-7600 or visit SLK-Law.com.

About Erin Smith Aebel
Erin Smith Aebel is board certified as a health law specialist by the Florida Bar. She represents physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers in business law, including fraud and abuse, Stark, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) issues and licensure. Aebel also advises on a variety of Florida health law issues including the developing medical marijuana law. Reported by PRWeb 9 hours ago.

Cambia Promotes Rob Coppedge to President of Direct Health Solutions

$
0
0
Cambia Health Solutions has announced the promotion of Rob Coppedge to President, Direct Health Solutions.

Portland, Ore. (PRWEB) February 18, 2016

Cambia Health Solutions has announced the promotion of Rob Coppedge to President, Direct Health Solutions. For the past five years, Rob has led Cambia’s diversification and strategic investment efforts as Cambia Senior Vice President of Strategic Investment and Corporate Development. This promotion expands Rob’s responsibilities to include oversight of Cambia’s health solutions businesses, including the portfolio of wholly-owned companies and direct investments. In this role, Rob will accelerate Cambia’s work in investing in and building companies that benefit health care consumers nationwide.

Rob Coppedge joined Cambia in 2010 as the company began to invest in and build businesses in alignment with the company’s long-standing mission to transform health care. Under his leadership, Cambia has invested in nearly 20 companies working to make health care easier for consumers nationwide. Rob is also the co-founder of the Cambia Grove, a community space for the Pacific Northwest’s emerging health care economic cluster where innovators and entrepreneurs can work closely together with regional stakeholders to find solutions to pressing health care challenges.

This announcement comes after Dudley Slater shared he is leaving the company to support family commitments. “Over the last three years as President of Direct Health Solutions, Dudley Slater has leveraged decades of experience in developing good ideas into successful businesses,” said Cambia Chief Operating Officer Jared Short. “Dudley has played a pivotal role at Cambia in building great companies that deliver consumer-focused solutions, leaving a solid foundation on which to build in support of Cambia’s mission to transform health care.”

Rob and Dudley have worked side by side to advance Cambia’s mission to make health care people-focused and economically sustainable, raising the organization’s profile as a recognized strategic health care investor and innovator.

“Rob Coppedge’s reputation as a health care investor and innovator is unmatched,” said Cambia Chief Operating Officer Jared Short. “I am excited to work with him as we continue to grow great health solutions companies.”

Before joining Cambia, Rob was founding partner of Faultline Ventures, where he worked with numerous early stage companies and strategic investors. He also held a variety of positions with Capitol Health Partners, a Washington, D.C., and New York City-based venture capital firm specializing in early-stage health services and health care information technology.

About Cambia Health Solutions
Cambia Health Solutions, headquartered in Portland, Oregon, is a health solutions company dedicated to transforming health care by creating a person-focused and economically sustainable system. Cambia’s growing family of companies range from software and mobile applications, health care marketplaces, non-traditional health care delivery models, health insurance, life insurance, pharmacy benefit management, wellness and overall consumer engagement. Through bold thinking and innovative technology, we are delivering solutions that make quality health care more available, affordable and personally relevant for everyone. To learn more, visit cambiahealth.com or twitter.com/cambia. Reported by PRWeb 8 hours ago.

Shannen Doherty Gives An Extremely Emotional Interview To Dr. Oz About Her Battle With Cancer — WATCH HERE

$
0
0
We just hope she makes a full recovery! As we reported last August, Shannen Doherty revealed she had breast cancer, which she blames on her former business manager. In a lawsuit against Tanner, Mainstain, Glynn & Johnson, the Charmed star says the company was negligent in handling her health insurance. Related: Shannen Doherty Directs Music Videos! On Thursday, [...] Reported by Perez Hilton 4 hours ago.

Dear Abby: Teen daughter’s iPad is full of explicit photos

$
0
0
Teen daughter’s iPad is full of explicit photos Despite my initial impulse to kill him and stick my daughter in a convent, we discussed it as a family and agreed she would see a gynecologist. To pull your daughter out of school or send her to a psychotherapist would be an overreaction. The kind of photos you describe can cause big problems for teenage girls. Colleges and prospective employers have been known to scour the Internet looking for these kinds of postings when interviewing students and job seekers. What may seem like innocent fun now could cause her big headaches a few years down the line, and your daughter needs to know it. Should I seek counseling and stay with this job to see if my anxiety lessens, or find another one where I won’t have to deal with cash? I’m terrified of this happening again, since the thief got away with it. Some states offer it as part of a victims assistance program, but if yours does not, then you will have to get it privately through your health insurance or your employer’s. Reported by SFGate 23 hours ago.

Capitol Report: Health-insurance costs rise by nearly 5%, latest CPI data shows

$
0
0
Reported by MarketWatch 14 hours ago.

This exclusive report reveals the ABCs of the IoT

$
0
0
The Internet of Things (IoT) Revolution is picking up speed and it will change how we live, work, and entertain ourselves in a million ways big and small.

From agriculture to defense, retail to healthcare, everything is going to be impacted by the growing ability of businesses, governments, and consumers to connect to and control their environments:

· “Smart mirrors” will allow consumers to try on clothes digitally, enhancing their shopping experience and reducing returns for the retailer
· Assembly line sensors will detect tiny drops in efficiency that indicate critical equipment is wearing out and schedule down-time maintenance in response
· Agricultural equipment guided by GPS and IoT technology will soon plant, fertilize and harvest vast croplands like a giant Roomba while the “driver” reads a magazine
· Active people will share lifestyle data from their fitness trackers in order to help their doctor make better health care decisions (and capture discounts on health insurance premiums)

No wonder the Internet of Things has been called “the next Industrial Revolution.” It’s so big that it could mean new revenue streams for your company and new opportunities for you. The only question is: Are you fully up to speed on the IoT?

After months of researching and reporting this exploding trend, Business Insider Intelligence has put together an essential briefing that explains the exciting present and the fascinating future of the Internet of Things. It covers how IoT is being implemented today, where the new sources of opportunity will be tomorrow and how 17 separate sectors of the economy will be transformed over the next 20 years, including:

· Agriculture
· Connected Home
· Defense
· Financial services
· Food services
· Healthcare
· Hospitality
· Infrastructure
· Insurance

· Logistics
· Manufacturing
· Oil, gas, and mining
· Retail
· Smart buildings
· Transportation
· Connected Car
· Utilities

 

If you work in any of these sectors, it's important for you to understand how the IoT will change your business and possibly even your career. And if you’re employed in any of the industries that will build out the IoT infrastructure—networking, semiconductors, telecommunications, data storage, cybersecurity—this report is a must-have.

Among the big picture insights you’ll get from *The Internet of Things: Examining How the IoT Will Affect The World*:

· IoT devices connected to the Internet will more than triple by 2020, from 10 billion to 34 billion. IoT devices will account for 24 billion, while traditional computing devices (e.g. smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) will comprise 10 billion.
· Nearly $6 trillion will be spent on IoT solutions over the next five years.
· Businesses will be the top adopter of IoT solutions because they will use IoT to 1) lower operating costs; 2) increase productivity; and 3) expand to new markets or develop new product offerings.
· Governments will be the second-largest adopters, while consumers will be the group least transformed by the IoT.

And when you dig deep into the report, you’ll get the whole story in a clear, no-nonsense presentation:

· The complex infrastructure of the Internet of Things distilled into a single ecosystem
· The most comprehensive breakdown of the benefits and drawbacks of mesh (e.g. ZigBee, Z- Wave, etc.), cellular (e.g. 3G/4G, Sigfox, etc.), and internet (e.g. Wi-Fi, Ethernet, etc.) networks
· The important role analytics systems, including edge analytics, cloud analytics, will play in making the most of IoT investments
· The sizable security challenges presented by the IoT and how they can be overcome
· The four powerful forces driving IoT innovation, plus the four difficult market barriers to IoT adoption
· Complete analysis of the likely future investment in the critical IoT infrastructure: connectivity, security, data storage, system integration, device hardware, and application development
· In-depth analysis of how the IoT ecosystem will change and disrupt 17 different industries

*The Internet of Things: Examining How the IoT Will Affect The World* is how you get the full story on the Internet of Things.

To get your copy of this invaluable guide to the IoT universe, choose one of these options:

1. Purchase an ALL-ACCESS Membership that entitles you to immediate access to not only this report, but also dozens of other research reports, subscriptions to all 5 of the BI Intelligence daily newsletters, and much more. >> *START A MEMBERSHIP*
2. Purchase the report and download it immediately from our research store. >> *BUY THE REPORT*

The choice is yours. But however you decide to acquire this report, you’ve given yourself a powerful advantage in your understanding of the fast-moving world of the IoT.

Join the conversation about this story » Reported by Business Insider 13 hours ago.

Price controls on drugs in Cuomo's budget don't go far enough, Albany health insurance CEO says

$
0
0
Drug companies would be required to give the state government proprietary information about research, marketing and manufacturing costs under a proposal included in Gov. Andrew Cuomo's budget. The measure, aimed at reducing pharmacy costs in the state's Medicaid program, could set a dangerous precedent for price controls, according to the state's largest business lobbying group. And while it might help lower costs for government health care programs, it would raise costs for private insurers and… Reported by bizjournals 12 hours ago.

The Campaign Promises Hillary Probably Can't Keep

$
0
0
" I will not promise you something I cannot deliver," Hillary Clinton has repeatedly told voters, including a group of mainly African American voters in South Carolina last week.

This is meant to contrast Hillary's "achievable" small bore reforms to Bernie Sander's more sweeping reform proposals which are allegedly less achievable.

Hillary's pledge to deliver on all her promises is at the heart of her pitch to Democratic voters. It is demonstrably false.

Given partisan gerrymandering, it is almost certain that Republicans will control the next House. And even if Democrats retake the Senate, there's virtually no chance Democrats will have a 60-40 veto proof majority.

Since retaking control of Congress after President Obama's first two years in office, Congressional Republicans have consistently blocked Obama from enacting the types of reforms Hillary is proposing. How can Hillary credibly promise that they won't do the same to her proposals , if she became President?

She can't. And she knows it. Which is one of the reasons that voters find Hillary less than trustworthy.

Indeed Bernie's outsider strategy of building a political revolution of millions of Americans demanding an end to the rigged economic and political system may have a better chance of succeeding over the course of several election cycles and an 8-year Presidency than Hillary's Washington insider strategy of negotiating legislative compromises with intransigent Congressional Republicans.

Let's take a simple example. Bernie Sanders has proposed raising the Federal minimum wage to $15 an hour from its current level of $7.25, while Hillary Clinton has proposed a more "pragmatic" level of $12 an hour, even though this lower level would still leave full-time minimum wage workers in poverty. Two years ago, when President Obama proposed raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour and House Democrats put forward a bill that would raise it to $10.10, House Republicans unanimously voted it down.

Does Hillary Clinton really believe she can keep her promise of a $12 an hour minimum wage and get it through Congress? How? Would she negotiate a deal with Congressional Republicans to raise the minimum wage in exchange, say, for increasing the age for qualifying for Medicare to 67, or cutting the capital gains tax to 15%?

Indeed, Bernie's chances of success may be greater.

63% of Americans (including Democrats, Republicans, and Independents) favor raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour. But Congress, which as Bernie maintains is controlled by the donor class, does the will of hits corporate donors who want to keep wages low.

What if President Sanders led a March of a million or more citizens on Washington demanding a $15 minimum wage? It's not certain it would work, but it has a better chance of changing votes of some Republicans in Congress than backroom deal-making. And even if it didn't work the first time, given the popularity of a $15 minimum wage across party lines, it might shift enough Congressional seats in the 2018 Congressional election to pass.

Let's take a more complex issue: health care. Although a long-time supporter of Medicare-For-All, Bernie Sanders voted for the Affordable Care Act and helped write portions like additional funding for community health centers.

While Bernie has promised to defend the ACA from Republican attempts to repeal it, his long-term goal remains Medicare-For-All which he believes is a right, not a privilege, and which he believes will improve health care outcomes, while significantly lowering the cost of health care in America which is far more expensive than every other industrialized country.

Hillary claims her promises on health care are more achievable. But if you go to Hillary's website, her proposals are actually rather vague: According to her website,.""Hillary is committed to building on delivery system reforms in the Affordable Care Act that improve value and quality care for Americans.""Hillary believes we need to demand lower drug costs for hardworking families and seniors."

But it's unclear how she plans to accomplish any of this. With the ACA dependent on the private health insurance industry, what steps could President Clinton actually take to "improve value and quality"? On drug prices, in order to pass the ACA the Obama administration made a deal with big PHarMA to include a provision banning Medicare from negotiating the price of drugs with manufacturers. Would Hillary break President Obama's deal? Would Democratic Senators who signed onto the deal go along with that?

And with a Republican House that has voted to repeal the ACA multiple times, and with Senators and Congressman of both parties receiving huge campaign contributions from drug companies, how would she win a vote allowing the government to negotiate lower drug prices? It's extremely unlikely she would--Another campaign promise that Hillary can't deliver on and probably knows she can't deliver on.

It's unlikely that a President Sanders could pass Medicare-For-All early in a first term. But if starting in 1993, when Hillary first designed her health care proposals which abandoned the Democrats' decades long fight for single payer health care in favor of a proposal reliant on private insurance, she had instead led the fight for single payer health care, there's a good chance we would have it by now.

And if Bernie Sanders uses the Presidential bully pulpit to argue for Medicare-For-All and rally its millions of supporters, it might well become possible by the end of his second term, particularly as private medical costs continue to escalate, millions of Americans must still do without health insurance, and millions more can't afford care because of high deductibles and high co-pays.

And imagine this. What if President Sanders led a caravan of thousands of seniors across the US-Canadian border to buy prescription drugs at a fraction of the price as in the US? Might that not be more effective in pressuring Congress to pass legislation allowing Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices than all the back-room dealing that a President Clinton might attempt?

Moreover, although Sanders has spoken for the same principles for 35 years, he's also a talented politician and is not immune to pragmatic compromise. As long as the ACA is law, he would certainly fight as hard or harder as Hillary to give the Federal government the power to negotiate Medicare drug prices.

And he might decide to take an incremental approach to reaching Medicare-For- All. For example, he might propose allowing Americans over 55 and under 25 to buy into Medicare, and then alter the age-range by a decade every few years until all Americans are covered.

The minimum wage and health care are just two examples of promises Hillary Clinton is unlikely to keep because they would die in a Republican-controlled House and a non-fillibuster proof Senate. Her promises to pass them by negotiating back-room deals with Congressional Republicans ring hollow.

There's no guarantee that Bernie Sander's political revolution would fully succeed. But mobilizing millions of Americans to take power back from the oligarchs who've bought Congress has a better chance than Hillary's strategy of back-room dealing.

It actually may be not only the more idealistic strategy but also the more pragmatic one.

In any case, Hillary's pledge to not make promises she can't keep is simply not credible.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 10 hours ago.

STOCKS FINISH BEST WEEK OF THE YEAR: Here's what you need to know

$
0
0
STOCKS FINISH BEST WEEK OF THE YEAR: Here's what you need to know Stocks finished their best week of the year with a mixed session that saw futures open lower before ultimately closing the day little changed.

For the holiday-shortened week, the Dow and S&P 500 both gained more than 2.5% while the Nasdaq added almost 4%. 

First, the scoreboard:

· *Dow:* 16,392, -21, (-0.1%)
· *S&P 500:* 1,917.8, -0.05, (-0.00%)
· *Nasdaq:* 4,504.4, +16.9, (+0.4%)
· *WTI crude oil:* $32.00, -3%

*Inflation*

Inflation is here.

Consumer prices were flat in January while "core" consumer prices — which exclude the more volatile costs of food and gas — rose 0.3% from the prior month, beating expectations. This monthly increase was the largest since May 2006, according to BNP Paribas.

Compared to last year, "core" prices rose 2.2%, the fastest rate in over four years as fears of deflation appear clearly misplaced.

"You can clear all those thoughts of deflation, deficient demand, and secular stagnation away because the CPI report says this economy is heating up," Chris Rupkey at MUFG said on Friday.

"Everything is going up, it is striking how of the major categories of goods and services, consumers are paying more for everything, new cars, used cars, clothing, medical care commodities and services, transportation, shelter. Even commodities less food and energy rose 0.2% for the first time in many a moon and these were supposed to be held down by 'a strong dollar and falling import prices' the Fed economic staff maintained: not anymore. Net, net, the Fed is behind the curve."

We'd note, however, that the Fed's preferred measure of inflation is the PCE deflator, which has lagged CPI in recent months and still shows the Fed below its 2% inflation target.

*Yahoo*

Yahoo's board formed a committee to "explore strategic alternatives."

Which is, I mean, sort like the bare minimum of what you'd expect the company's board to be doing at this point. 

To say the least, Yahoo has been an embattled company over the last few months.

The company has been: firing staff, bailing on its plan to spin-off its Alibaba stake, saying it would spin-out its core business, not making much progress on selling that business, and the board is also fighting. 

Yahoo shares gained about 11% this week. 

*Stock Market*

Outflows from equity funds accelerated last week, marking the seventh-straight week that money has moved out of stocks, the longest streak since 2008. Last week's exodus was the largest yet. 

According to analysts at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the rate at which money is moving out of these funds indicates capitulation by investors. And given the rally in stocks seen this week, investors finally giving up right as things turn around is completely consistent with the psychology of capitulatory moments. 

In a note on Friday morning Kit Juckes at Societe Generale said the action in financial markets over the last few days indicates that perhaps the worst of the volatility we've seen to start the year is over. 

Of course, investors will remember how 2015 went: rocky start, big lull, volatile late summer/early fall, and with the US election lingering and political instability seeming ready to re-emerge in Europe, 2016 is looking at a similar set-up. 

But even in the most volatile years you can't just have markets making huge moves all of the time, and so if the weeks between now and the March Fed meeting serve as a calm period we wouldn't be shocked. 

*Commodities*

John Deere cut its outlook for the year, forecasting a rough year for the farming and construction industries. Deere is seen a bellwether of international farming and construction activity because, much like rival Caterpillar, the company sells the kind of big machinery you only invest in if things are going well. 

In its earnings release, Deere said its results, "reflected the continuing impact of the downturn in the global farm economy as well as weakness in construction equipment market."

Shares of the company fell about 4% on Friday. 

Crude oil prices also fell about 3% on Friday which, as we've written before, would have been news on its own some time ago but now sort of seems like a normal day. And given how many days this year we've seen crude prices rise or fall at least 5%, what's 3% between friends?

The latest Baker Hughes rig count, meanwhile, continued to show a collapse in rigs being used by US oil producers with active rigs falling by 26 this week to the lowest total since December 2009. 

Also in oil news, Former Fed chair Ben Bernanke looked at the relationship between crude oil prices, stock prices, and why stocks and crude move together. The verdict? Partly worries about demand, partly a result of heightened volatility across the universe of investable assets. 

Here's Bernanke (emphasis ours):

Our bottom line: The tendency of stocks and oil prices to move together is not a new development; it goes back nearly five years (the limits of our sample) and probably more. *Much of this positive correlation can be explained by the tendency of stocks and oil prices to react in the same direction to common factors, including changes in aggregate demand and in overall uncertainty and risk aversion.* However, even accounting for these factors, the residual correlation is close to zero, not negative as we would expect if it were capturing only beneficial supply shocks. There are several other explanations that could be investigated: for example, the possibility that declines in oil prices, even if initially caused by higher supply, affect global financial conditions by damaging the creditworthiness of oil-producing companies or countries. This topic is one well worth revisiting.

Unrelated: Bernanke was on "The Big Bang Theory" last night. 

*Additionally*

Tomato prices in January went bananas. 

Like all brick-and-mortar retailers, Nordstrom is doomed. 

S&P thinks Carl Icahn might be junk. 

Health insurance startup Zenefits is imploding.

First, Trump goes after The Pope. Now, Apple. 

Harper Lee, author of 'To Kill A Mockingbird,' dead at 89. 

Is something weird going on at Citadel? 

*SEE ALSO: Here's what 18 Wall Street pros are predicting for the stock market in 2016*

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A new theory suggests this is the real reason Cam Newton stormed out of his press conference Reported by Business Insider 9 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images