Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Are you still paying for your birth control? That might be illegal

$
0
0
The Obama administration has declared that health insurance companies must cover all contraception methods. Will this decision have an impact on you?

Continue reading... Reported by guardian.co.uk 11 hours ago.

3 Questions to Help Sort Student Health Coverage Choices

$
0
0
3 questions to help students sort college health insurance options before leaving for school Reported by ABCNews.com 10 hours ago.

Guy Going Blind Inspires Heated ObamaCare Debate

$
0
0
Guy Going Blind Inspires Heated ObamaCare Debate A man named Luis Lang in South Carolina is emerging as the face of a new debate about ObamaCare. As a story by Ann Doss Helms of the Charlotte Observer explains, Lang is a 49-year-old self-employed handyman who has long shunned health insurance and paid his own medical bills. But... Reported by Newser 9 hours ago.

How one couple saved $100,000 to buy a house in only 2 years by working on a yacht

$
0
0
How one couple saved $100,000 to buy a house in only 2 years by working on a yacht In their mid-20s, Shaun and Kelsey Miller decided to spend the next few years of their lives at sea.

"We had been making ends meet, but not saving money," Kelsey, now 30, says. "We wanted to be able to save enough to put a down payment on a house."

By working on yachts together — Shaun as a captain, and Kelsey as a chef — they'd live rent-free and have virtually no expenses.

Finding a job was easy. At the time, they were based in the Caribbean, one of the major destinations for private yachts and their owners, working odd jobs.

Shaun did marine carpentry and boat deliveries, while Kelsey worked on organic farms, worked as a gardener, and trained as a chef.

"Shaun had worked on boats before, but I hadn't, even though I grew up around them," Kelsey explains.

"It's easy to get into the industry without any previous experience, especially if you've worked in hospitality before."

Positions for chefs, stewardesses (who serve meals and clean), and deckhands, who do basic maintenance work, generally don't require any boating knowledge.

Ultimately, the Millers ended up on an 82-foot sailboat where they earned a combined $115,000 per year, which is a standard starting salary for a boat of that size.

They were able to immediately start saving most of the money that they earned. "On the boat, we had basically no expenses," Kelsey says. "Our groceries were paid for, our uniforms were paid for, our toiletries were paid for, and we had a rental car wherever the boat was docked." The boat's owner even provided health insurance that covered them while they were on board.

Besides supplemental insurance to make sure that they were covered in case of an accident on land, the couple's only real expense was a phone plan to call home.

Staying in touch with friends and family was a challenge: Since the owner of the boat used it over the holidays, they weren't able to return home to Massachusetts, where Kelsey's family lives, or South Africa, where Shaun is from. 

And their nomadic lifestyle — moving from the Caribbean in winter to Annapolis, Maryland and Newport, Rhode Island in the summer — made it hard to put down roots.

Being surrounded by luxury in expensive resort areas meant that the couple had to stay focused on their savings goals and avoid getting drawn into a high-priced lifestyle. While they didn't have a specific target number in mind, they were engaged at the time, and knew that both buying a house and planning a wedding was in their future.

"Because we had those two goals in mind and planned to move to shore after we got married and bought a house, we didn't treat the money as disposable income," Kelsey explains. "For people who make working on a boat into a lifelong career, it's easier to spend money on clothing or expensive jewelry or fancy meals."

Allowing themselves to spend some of their savings on travel made sticking to their frugal budget seem like less of a chore. "We did a dive trip in the Maldives and also went to Mozambique and stayed in a resort there," Kelsey says. "Those vacations were expensive, but travel was a priority of ours. You have to reward yourself a little bit."

Sailing into Newport one day in July in 2011, the couple both felt they were returning home, and decided to look at houses in the area. At that point, they'd been working on boats for two years and had saved up $100,000 towards a down payment.

"We weren't really serious about it, and just started casually looking around," Kelsey says.

But by October, they'd found their dream house and signed the papers. The turn-of-the-century farmhouse had a backyard large enough for a garden and a dog, two spare bedrooms for visiting family and friends, and was within walking distance of the beach.

Best of all, it came with an unfinished barn and garage which could be converted into a workshop and studio — Shaun is a carpenter and Kelsey is an artist and printmaker. And at $315,000, it was within their budget.*
*

After finalizing the sale, they immediately went back to work on the boat. "We basically emptied our accounts when we bought the house, but then replenished them really quickly," Kelsey explains. With their basic living expenses covered, they were able to rebuild their cushion of savings while also making double payments on the mortgage.

Two years later, they "retired" to land, feeling that it was time to start working towards their long-term career goals. Shaun is now doing boatbuilding and marine carpentry while Kelsey pursues a Master of Fine Arts degree in printmaking, in hopes of eventually getting a teaching job. From time to time, they take short-term freelance jobs on boats for extra money, and are working to adjust to the fact their income is a third of what it used to be.

The Millers emphasize that working on yachts isn't as glamorous as it looks — like any other service industry, it involves a lot of hard work.

"When you have guests on board, you're on your feet for 15 to 18 hours a day, often for 10 days straight," Kelsey says. "You're up before the first guest is up, and go to bed after the last guest has gone to bed." The crew is expected to perform service on par with a five-star hotel — but unlike at a five-star hotel, they don't have hundreds of people on staff to help.

Despite the challenges, she says that working on a yacht was worth it. "I feel very fortunate that we had this experience and were able to travel — and also that we're 30 and own our own home."

*SEE ALSO: Here's the salary you have to earn to buy a home in 15 major US cities*

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: JAMES ALTUCHER: Why investing in a 401(k) is a complete waste of money Reported by Business Insider 9 hours ago.

State officials respond to reports of possible Hawaii Health Connector shutdown

$
0
0
With reports circulating about the impending demise of the Hawaii Health Connector over the next five months, the state’s top officials from the health insurance marketplace say such talks are premature. Details of the possible shutdown were reported by a Honolulu newspaper over the weekend, citing a draft corrective action plan submitted by Gov. David Ige’s administration to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which officials from his office say were apparently leaked. “The state… Reported by bizjournals 9 hours ago.

More Firms Tell Gay Workers to Marry to Keep Health Insurance

$
0
0
More employers are telling their gay employees that if they want to keep their joint health insurance plans for their partners, then they need to get married. Reported by Newsmax 8 hours ago.

NEIC Brings Together Healthcare Technology Innovators at Disruptive! Healthcare 2015

$
0
0
The New England Innovation Center (NEIC), eCoast, the Greater Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce, and the NH High Tech Council announce the lineup for their highly anticipated event: Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015.

(PRWEB) May 13, 2015

The New England Innovation Center (NEIC), eCoast, the Greater Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce, and the NH High Tech Council have announced the lineup for their highly anticipated event: Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015. The full-day summit is devoted to celebrating disruptive innovation in the healthcare sector, and it will be held at the historic Wentworth by the Sea Hotel in New Castle, NH on Friday, May 22nd.

Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015 is the third event in the Disruptivate! Series, the first two of which brought together business and industry leaders in sellout numbers. The previous event, Disruptivate! Vertical, split its focus between the healthcare and education industries, while the first celebrated disruptive innovation in technology.

Mark Galvin, Managing Partner of the NEIC and the driving force behind the Disruptivate! Series, decided to hone in on healthcare this time around. "It deserves its own event. The percentage of our economy being consumed by healthcare is incredible. We're seeing the industry becoming more complex when it should be simplified. We need to bring people together to figure out how we can achieve improvements in healthcare technology and cost on the scales seen by the high-tech industry."

Galvin admitted that this event is long overdue. "Over the last two years, so many community and business leaders have asked what we can do to shrink costs, expand coverage, and improve outcomes in what has become one-sixth of our economy. Disruptive innovation—Disruptivate! Healthcare—is the short answer! Driving it for New Hampshire and the surrounding region is the first big step."

Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015 promises a celebration of disruptive innovation in healthcare—bringing together the most promising thought leaders, innovators, technology developers, and problem-solvers. The summit will feature presentations from winners of the Disruptivator to Watch (D2W) contest, panel discussions on a wide range of topics from the effects of wearable technology to new healthcare delivery methods, knowledge-sharing, networking, and a collaborative environment geared towards producing real solutions to the biggest problems in the industry. Attendees will also enjoy buffet breakfasts and lunches catered by the Wentworth, as well as networking breaks capped off with a cocktail social at the end of the day.

Over 250 people are expected to attend, including entrepreneurs, inventors, engineers, medical professionals and managers, doctors and nurses, business owners and managers, human resource professionals, health insurance brokers and administrators, civic servants, private investors, angels, venture capitalists, tech junkies, journalists, and a great number of people and organizations simply interested in disruptive innovation in healthcare.

Since word got out about Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015, sponsors have been lining up to get involved. Pierce Atwood, one of the most prominent and respected law firms in New England, secured a platinum sponsorship for the event, citing their dedication to supporting business and innovation in the region. Several other innovative companies were also eager to sponsor the event. ConvenientMD is opening affordable, convenient urgent care centers across NH. OurHealthConnector is streamlining the process of collecting and organizing electronic medical records for patients. MyMedicalShopper is a healthcare transparency platform dedicated to making cost and quality information available to consumers. All three wanted to help support and promote the event.

Christopher Matrumalo, D!H15 Program Director, says the summit has attracted panelists from all over the country. "We've received applications from potential panelists as far away as Chicago and Nashville. We've gained a lot of attention from both inside and outside the industry. Everyone we talk to wants to participate." The panels will also feature rock star moderators to help focus the panels on informative and actionable data, with Doug Banks, executive editor at the Boston Business Journal, former Chair of the MIT Enterprise Forum Innovation Series Committee, and Publisher of Mass High Tech, and our very own Jeff Feingold, longtime editor at New Hampshire Business Review.

Tickets are $149 for attendees, but they are currently available online at an early bird rate of $99 each. Tickets include all summit events, including all panels, keynote, Disruptivator to Watch presentations, as well as the breakfast and lunch buffets. To reserve tickets to this exciting event, interested parties should visit http://www.DisruptivateHealthcare.com.

For more information on Disruptivate! Healthcare 2015, please visit http://www.DisruptivateHealthcare.com, or contact Mark Galvin, who is the Managing Partner of the New England Innovation Center. Reported by PRWeb 9 hours ago.

Members Of Congress Might Not Be Affected By The Supreme Court's Ruling On Health Care

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — If the Supreme Court rules the way most Republicans want in the latest health overhaul case, GOP lawmakers who now have insurance coverage under President Barack Obama's law might have some explaining to do.

Members of Congress, staffers and dependents actually get their health insurance under a little-known provision of "Obamacare." But if the Supreme Court strikes down government health care subsidies for millions of people in more than 30 states, legal and benefits experts say coverage for lawmakers from those states won't be affected.

It could be a politically painful unintended consequence.

"That won't look good, will it?" said Walt Francis, author of an annual guide to the federal employee health benefits program.

About 15,000 congressional staffers, lawmakers and dependents in the capital and around the country get their health insurance through the Washington small business exchange, an online market created by the District of Columbia government under the federal health care law.

The members of Congress and staffers get coverage through DC Health Link because the Affordable Care Act requires them to use the same kind of channels as do regular folks.

However, instead of the tax credits at issue in the Supreme Court case, lawmakers and staffers receive the usual government contribution for employee health insurance.

In the court challenge, known as King v. Burwell, opponents argue that the literal wording of the health law prevents the government from providing tax credits to residents of states that failed to set up insurance exchanges. Most states fall into that category, relying instead on the federal government's HealthCare.gov website.

The tax credits and the government employee contribution serve the same purpose: to help people pay premiums. But experts say legal differences between a tax credit and an employer contribution would insulate Congress from any fallout if the Supreme Court invalidates tax credits in states that aren't running their own insurance markets.

"Congress is covered under a completely different section of the Affordable Care Act," said Tim Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University in Virginia. "The provision for covering Congress is completely unrelated to income-based tax credits."

And there's a second reason why congressional coverage would be safe: The District of Columbia health insurance exchange that lawmakers and staff use is considered a state-run marketplace. The court case only threatens the subsidies for states using the federal exchange.

Congress got shifted from the federal employee plan to the health care law's insurance exchanges because of an amendment by Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa back when the law was being debated. The tortuous path the law has since followed was unforeseen at that time.

Grassley reasoned that what's good enough for the public should be good enough for lawmakers. If regular folks had to use health insurance exchanges, so should lawmakers and staff.

In practice, important differences remained between congressional coverage and the kind that their constituents are getting. A court ruling in favor of the health care law's opponents would strip away the veil.

"If King v. Burwell goes for the plaintiffs, 8 to 9 million people will lose coverage in 34 states, and their congressmen will continue to get coverage through the D.C. exchange," added Jost, who is a supporter of the health care law.

A Supreme Court ruling is expected late in June.

The administration has argued that the law, when read in context, makes it clear that residents of all 50 states are entitled to health insurance tax credits, regardless of the actions of their state leaders. Most of the states that have not set up insurance exchanges are led by Republicans, among them Texas, Florida, Georgia and Ohio.

If the court overturns the subsidies, senior Republicans in Congress say they would step in to prevent consumers from losing coverage. But they haven't said how they would do that. And the White House is likely to resist the kinds of major changes to the health care law that Republicans might demand in exchange for continuing the subsidies.

"The bigger issue here is whether Congress would come up with something as a stopgap to help those people," said Francis, the federal health benefits expert.

Contacted by The Associated Press, GOP congressional leadership offices would not comment. Neither would the Obama administration. Grassley's office also would not comment.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

Iowa State Senator Proposes Mandatory Drug Testing for Senators

$
0
0
Iowa State Senator Proposes Mandatory Drug Testing for Senators Iowa State Senator Proposes Mandatory Drug Testing for Senators
Iowa State Senator Proposes Mandatory Drug Testing for Senators
Legal
Politics
Senate, Senator, Congress, Iowa, Drug test, Welfare, Drug test welfare, GOP, Republicans
Has Been Optimized

Iowa state Sen. Jason Schultz, R-Schleswig wrote an amendment to Iowa state’s health and human services spending bill that would have mandated drug screening for senators. The proposed amendment failed, as Senate President Pam Jochum, D-Dubuque, ruled that the amendment was not relevant to the aforementioned bill.

During the debate on the floor for the fiscal 2016 health and human services budget bill, Schultz made the case: “This is saying that we will test ourselves, as we would suggest that those who receive assistance be tested, as the people who pay taxes as a condition of employment are tested,” Private sector workplace drug testing is permitted in the state of Iowa, provided that the employer has ‘reasonable suspicion’ of drug use, and has written a company-specific policy. Mandatory training for supervisors is required, and some financial support designated towards rehabilitation may be required of the employer, among other requirements.

24 members of the minority GOP supported the amendment. If the amendment had passed, the punishment for senators who failed the test would be ineligibility for the state’s group health insurance program.

“Ladies and gentlemen, the people of America were furious when Obamacare was imposed upon America and Congress exempted itself,” Schultz stated. “By no means should we exempt ourselves from what we believe is good public policy and I believe good public policy is protecting the taxpayers of Iowa.”

Schultz, who is serving his third term, has worked on a farm with his parents for 18 years. He also served in the Iowa National Guard for seven years and was a volunteer fireman.

Following Schultz’s remarks, Sen. Robert Dvorsky, D-Coralville, asked Senate President Jochum, to issue a ruling on whether the amendment was relevant to the spending bill. Jochum ruled in favor of Dvorsky, that the amendment was “non-germane to Senate File 505.”

Later, the Senate voted on a another GOP bill that would have required that public assistance beneficiaries pass a drug test before receiving assistance under the Iowa’s Family Investment Program (FIP), which I administrated under the department of Human Services.

The bill was struck down by the senate, on a 23-26 party-line vote.
 

Sources: Iowa.gov, Des Moines Register, Quad-City Times, Wikipedia

Photo Sources: Flickr

Comments: 
Likes: 
Shares: 
Combined FB: 
Video Piece: 
Regular Piece
OV in Depth:  Reported by Opposing Views 8 hours ago.

A.M. Best Affirms Ratings of Prudential Financial Inc. and Its Subsidiaries

$
0
0
A.M. Best Affirms Ratings of Prudential Financial Inc. and Its Subsidiaries OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A.M. Best has affirmed the financial strength rating (FSR) of A+ (Superior) and the issuer credit ratings (ICR) of “aa-” of the domestic life/health insurance subsidiaries of Prudential Financial, Inc. (PFI) (Newark, NJ) [NYSE: PRU]. Concurrently, A.M. Best has affirmed the ICR of “a-” of PFI and all existing debt ratings of the group. All domestic life/health subsidiaries of PFI are collectively referred to as Prudential. The outlook for all ratings is stable. T Reported by Business Wire 7 hours ago.

How much is that doggie in the window? In Phoenix, not much

$
0
0
How much is that doggie in the window? If you're in Phoenix, not as much as other cities. That's according to a new study from a trio of websites that analyzed the total cost of pet ownership across the country. From real estate options to pet health insurance, Phoenix is the most affordable major U.S. city to own a dog, according to the study, which was compiled by Seattle-based real estate brokerage website Redfin, pet insurance provider Trupanion and dog sitters-for-hire website Rover.com. In… Reported by bizjournals 7 hours ago.

Improving Treatment of Behavioral Health in Duals Programs Will Take Longer than Expected, Plan Executives Tell AIS

$
0
0
Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible programs will continue to improve integrated care, but accomplishing other goals, specifically related to behavioral health, will take longer than many have expected, according to reporting in the May 7 issue of Atlantic Information Services’ Medicare Advantage News.

Washington, DC (PRWEB) May 13, 2015

Now that almost all of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-backed programs for Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles are active, it’s clear that despite early improvements in integrated care, achieving some of the more ambitious goals will take longer than expected, health plan executives say. This was the consensus view of the 11 speakers at a recent Atlantic Information Services virtual conference on dual-eligible programs, covered in the May 7 issue of the publisher’s Medicare Advantage News.

One of the major problems cited by the speakers was integrating behavioral health (BH), causing Brian Wheelan, executive vice president and chief strategy officer at behavioral health managed care specialist Beacon Health Options, to call it an “unrealistic” goal. Wheelan and Tom Standring, vice president, Medicare, at Molina Healthcare, Inc., cited regulations surrounding protected health information (PHI) as a setback. More pressingly, according to Wheelan, the necessary infrastructure needed to treat mentally ill patients doesn’t exist. “There still is an immediate shortage of sub-acute services and crisis-stabilization beds” for duals with BH issues, he said, which will take time to set up.

There are also a lot of dual eligibles in need of behavioral health services. Lois Simon, president of Commonwealth Care Alliance (CCA) in Massachusetts, said that of the more than 10,000 enrollees CCA has attracted in the Massachusetts duals demo, 70% have a BH diagnosis. And many of them who are classified needing a relatively low degree of care turn out to be more seriously ill, she noted. This contributes to another issue: about 25% of medical spending in the Massachusetts duals demo is used for pharmacy, which is much higher than the senior population CCA serves outside the demo.

Visit http://aishealth.com/archive/nman050715-02 to read the article in its entirety, including analysis of other reasons behind the setbacks — such as high start-up costs, delays in governmental guidance, issues integrating long-term care and more — as well as the areas in which the demo is working well. For more information on the April 16 virtual conference, and to purchase a recording, visit http://aishealth.com/marketplace/c5va02c.

About Medicare Advantage News
Medicare Advantage News is the health care industry’s #1 source of timely news and business strategies about Medicare Advantage plans, product design, marketing, enrollment, market expansions, CMS audits, and countless federal initiatives in this hotly contested area of health insurance. Published biweekly since 1994 (when it was Medicare+Choice), the newsletter exists to help plans boost revenues, increase enrollees, cut costs and improve outcomes in Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care. Visit http://aishealth.com/marketplace/medicare-advantage-news for more information.

About AIS    
Atlantic Information Services, Inc. (AIS) is a publishing and information company that has been serving the health care industry for more than 25 years. It develops highly targeted news, data and strategic information for managers in hospitals, health plans, medical group practices, pharmaceutical companies and other health care organizations. AIS products include print and electronic newsletters, websites, looseleafs, books, strategic reports, databases, webinars and conferences. Learn more at http://AISHealth.com. Reported by PRWeb 6 hours ago.

AIR Survey Research Experts to Present at American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference

$
0
0
Experts from the American Institutes for Research (AIR) will present on a variety of public opinion and survey research topics at the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 70th annual conference, being held May 14 – 17, 2015 in Hollywood, FL.

Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) May 13, 2015

Experts from the American Institutes for Research (AIR) will present on a variety of public opinion and survey research topics at the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 70th annual conference, being held May 14 – 17, 2015 in Hollywood, FL.

The theme of the conference, “A Meeting Place,” offers opportunities for experts to learn about the latest trends, innovations and research in the field, as well as discuss the shaping of public opinion and the consequences for individuals and groups.

AIR sessions include:

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Concurrent Session A, Session 3: New Directions in Sampling
1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 3

·         Surveying the District of Columbia GLBT Community Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
AIR Presenters: Clyde Tucker, Michael P. Cohen, Angelina N. KewalRamani & Sandy Eyster

Concurrent Session A, Session 5: Welcome to the Mainstream? Same-Sex Marriage, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 1

·         What Sex Were You Assigned At Birth on Your Original Birth Certificate? Methods of Identifying Transgender Respondents in a District of Columbia Health Survey
AIR Presenters: Angelina N. KewalRamani, Clyde Tucker, Sandy Eyster & Jeffrey Poirier

Concurrent Session A, Session 7: Methodological Briefs: Advances in Designing Questions in a Brief
1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 4

·         Using Item Response Theory Modeling to Evaluate Question Items for Multi-Item Scales in the School Climate Surveys
AIR Presenters: Cong Ye, Yan Wang & Sandy Eyster

·         Asking Sensitive Questions in a GLBT Health Survey: Does Instruction Placement and Length Matter?
AIR Presenters: Mark Masterton & Mengmeng Zhang

Concurrent Session B, Session 8: Evaluating and Compensating for Non-Response Bias
4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 5

·         Examining Differences in Response Propensities and Satisficing Among Medical Providers
AIR Presenters: Daniel G. Harwell, Tandrea Hilliard, Alison Huang & Melissa Mannon

Friday, May 15, 2015

Concurrent Session C, Session 4: Health Surveys and Self Reports: Exploring Reliability and Validity
8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. | Regency Ballroom 3

·         Examining Measurement Error in Self-Reports of Receiving Financial Assistance under the ACA
AIR Presenter: Daniel G. Harwell

Concurrent Session C, Session 8: Factors Related to Survey Participation
8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 5

·         An Evaluation of the Potential to Reduce Nonresponse and Bias Using the Census Planning Database in Preparation for a Household Survey
AIR Presenters: Cameron McPhee & Celeste Stone

Concurrent Session D, Session 3: ABS Refinements
10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 3

·         Exploring the Feasibility of Conducting a Two-Stage Mail Survey in a Single Stage
AIR Presenters: Rebecca Medway & Danielle Battle

Poster Session 2: Mini-Conference Posters
3:15 p.m. – 4:15 p.m. | Great Hall 4-6

·         Money Matters: How Financially Literate Are Our U.S. Teens?
AIR Presenters: David C. Miller & Teresa Kroeger

·         Comparing Methods for Correcting Nonresponse Bias in a School Climate Survey
AIR Presenters: Elisabeth Davis, Daniel G. Harwell, Samantha Neiman & Sandy Eyster

Concurrent Session F, Session 4: Reducing “Grid”-Lock: Advances in Formatting Questions in Grids Versus Alternative Formats
4:15 p.m. – 5:45 p.m. | Regency Ballroom 3

·         Using Grids Versus Mark All that Apply in a 2014 National Mail Survey
AIR Presenters: Danielle Battle & Mahi Megra

Concurrent Session F, Session 6: Monitoring and Evaluating Survey Quality
4:15 p.m. – 5:45 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 2

AIR Moderator: Daniel G. Harwell

Concurrent Session F, Session 8: Methodological Briefs: I’ll Do Anything for a Better Response Rate
4:15 p.m. – 5:45 p.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 5

·         The Effects of Persuasion Messages in the Advance Letter
AIR Presenter: Cong Ye

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Poster Session 3
1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. | Great Hall 4-6

·         Your Money’s No Good Here: Who Returns a Prepaid Incentive?
AIR Presenters: Ashley Kaiser & Danielle Battle

Concurrent Session I, Session 1: Mini-Conference Panel: AAPOR Big Data Task Force Panel
2:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. | Regency Ballroom 2

·         Paradigm Shift and Risks Involved
AIR Presenter: Julia Lane

Concurrent Session I, Session 2: Mode Effects
2:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. | Regency Ballroom 1

·         Characteristics of Web, Mail and Phone Responders to a Survey About the Health Insurance Marketplace
AIR Presenters: HarmoniJoie Noel, Stacey Bielick, Daniel G. Harwell & Steven Garfinkel

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Concurrent Session J, Session 1: Mini Conference: Using Latent Class Analysis to Evaluate Survey Quality
8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. | Regency Ballroom 2

AIR Moderator: Clyde Tucker

·         Using a Two-Part Markov Latent Class Model to Examine the Quality of Consumer Expenditure Reports
AIR Presenters: Brian Meekins & Clyde Tucker

Concurrent Session J, Session 7: Interviewers, Interviewing and Data Quality
8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 4

·         Accessing Quality of Interviewer Observations in Measuring Subjective Questions
AIR Presenter: Mengmeng Zhang

Concurrent Session K, Session 3: Methodological Briefs: Sampling and Frame Building
10:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 3

·         Probabilistic Record Linkage to the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System for Data Recovery and Validation in Physician Sampling Frames
AIR Presenters: Akash Desai & Grace Wang

·         To Re-Mail Or Not to Re-Mail: Evaluating Occupancy Status in an Address-Based Household Mail Survey
AIR Presenters: Cameron McPhee, Michelle Cantave & Mark Masterton

Concurrent Session K, Session 8: Maximizing Telephone and Cell Phone Survey Participation
10:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. | Diplomat Ballroom 5

·         The Effect of Varying Incentive Amounts on Physician Survey Response
AIR Presenters: HarmoniJoie Noel, Grace Wang, Akash Desai & Alison Huang

For more information about the conference, visit http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/Conference/2015-Conference/Annual-Meeting-Home.aspx.

About AIR

Established in 1946, with headquarters in Washington, D.C., the American Institutes for Research (AIR) is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization that conducts behavioral and social science research and delivers technical assistance both domestically and internationally in the areas of health, education and workforce productivity. For more information, visit http://www.air.org. Reported by PRWeb 6 hours ago.

Remembering the Lockout: Valarie Long on How Alaska Airlines Can Do Better for Communities

$
0
0
Ten years ago today, Alaska Airlines ramp workers were removed from their jobs at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) and replaced by workers employed by an outside contractor -- a moment remembered in a recent open letter from SEIU to the airline's shareholders.

On this, the tenth anniversary of an event that disrupted so many lives, *SEIU International Executive Vice President Valarie Long shares her thoughts*:

Last week, Alaska Airlines executives and shareholders met at the airlines annual meeting to look back at a year of record-breaking profits. Today, Alaska's former ramp workers such as Chris Ford are marking another occasion.

In the early morning hours of May 13, 2005, Alaska Airlines ramp workers were escorted off the tarmac at Sea-Tac, replaced by workers for a contractor that had slashed hourly wages.

The move eliminated roughly 500 positions, displacing employees, some of whom had been working for the company for more than two decades.

Alaska said at the time the decision was made as a cost-saving measure in response to rising fuel costs and competition from low-cost carriers. But it was workers such as Ford who paid the price.

Ford had worked for Alaska Airlines for 23 years prior to the lockout. He was a single dad to two young boys when Alaska Airlines fired him. Just two years earlier, then-CEO Bill Ayers called Ford an "unsung hero" in the airline's inflight magazine for lifting up to 20,000 pounds of cargo, including frozen fish, per day. "Most people didn't complain. We were making a living wage, we had benefits, it was a great job," said Ford who felt "betrayed" by the mass lockout 10 years ago.

His co-worker Travis Stanley and his wife were expecting their third child when Alaska Airlines fired its Sea-Tac ramp workers. Stanley and his family ran out of money and moved in with his mother. "It was embarrassing," said Stanley. "Especially being a grown-up, I'd made it so far for so long ... not being self-sufficient, that's the lowest point."

While Ford and Stanley fought their way back onto their feet following the lockout, many of those workers continue to struggle and the effects of Alaska's decision to outsource are still being felt in the region.

A memorandum released last week by San Francisco-based BAE Urban Economics estimates that lost wages and the resulting decline in economic activity from reduced household spending have cost King County, Wash., more than $115 million.

Alaska's decision is a window to a much larger trend: a relentless focus on cost-cutting by the aviation industry has damaged worker living standards and the economies of local communities these airlines serve across the nation. Airport jobs used to be good jobs. But many already lucrative airlines have chosen outsourcing to drive down wages and further boost profits. As airlines have encouraged contractors to compete on the basis of wages, pay for many jobs has dropped by as much as 45 percent in real terms. Today, more than 1 in 3 cleaners and baggage workers at airports live in or near poverty.

Like their counterparts at McDonald's, airport workers rely on public assistance at higher rates than workers in other industries. A full 13 percent of cleaners and baggage handlers qualify for health insurance through a public program and 15 percent report receiving food stamps.

After Alaska's decision to outsource its ramp operations at Sea-Tac, wages for its contract ramp workers hovered close to minimum wage for years--until workers started organizing a union in 2013.

That same year, workers at Sea-Tac helped spark the Fight for $15 movement. Workers and community supporters successfully passed a local referendum to raise Sea-Tac's minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Although inspiring raises elsewhere, Alaska Airlines, Airlines for America (an industry association upon whose board Alaska Airlines CEO Brad Tilden sits) and other major carriers have sued to block efforts by both Sea-Tac voters and the port authority to raise airport worker wages.

Alaska and the other major airlines' fight against $15 at Sea-Tac holds back more than just Alaska's own contract workforce. Thanks to Alaska's and other airlines efforts to block a $15 airport minimum wage approved by voters last year, Sea-Tac workers lost an estimated $16.5 million in higher wages--money that could have helped fuel the local economy and helped support workers' families.

It's a similar story for airport workers in Portland, Ore. Alaska Airlines leads the Portland Airlines Consortium, which hires other companies to provide cleaning and passenger wheelchair services to many airlines that operate at the airport. Janitors who keep PDX clean make as little as $11 per hour. Wheelchair assistants employed by Huntleigh USA most often make the minimum wage, with no raises unless the state minimum increases.

"When I started, the pay was minimum wage and after eight years. I am still making the minimum wage," said Kasil Kapriel, a Huntleigh USA employee, in testimony before the Port of Portland Board of Commissioners. "Every day, I give all of my effort at work, but there is no path for getting the raises or benefits that we deserve. There is no such thing as a raise or promotion here at my job. I am a single mother and right now it is very tough for me to get by."

Alaska can do better for workers, the communities it serves and its shareholders.

Over the past decade, the airline has made $2 billion in net profit. Despite its strong financial performance, Alaska is feeling significant pressure from its fierce competition with Delta Airlines for dominance in Seattle and other West Coast markets, as Delta strives to make Seattle its primary West Coast hub and its gateway to Asia.

Alaska Airlines has responded by staking a claim on being Seattle's hometown airline; investing heavily in marketing campaigns to support that image and "defend its position as the carrier of choice in the Pacific Northwest." In the process, the airline has called on local stakeholders to subsidize its Sea-Tac terminal development projects while opposing those of other airlines that help bring business to the Seattle region.

At the shareholders meeting last week, former Alaska ramp worker Alex Hoopes told the airlines CEO Brad Tilden that "I used to have a middle-class job making $21 an hour working for this company. Today, I do the same work and I'm paid less than half of what I used to be paid. I struggled to make mortgage payments ... to pay for groceries." Hoopes went on to ask, "Can you explain to me how a company that values cost savings above loyalty and hardworking men and women makes Alaska a hometown airline?"

Alex Hoopes and his co-workers at Sea-Tac are still waiting for that answer.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

Health Insurance Innovations misses by $0.07, misses on revenue

$
0
0
Reported by SeekingAlpha 5 hours ago.

Colorado health insurance exchange questioned by oversight committee

$
0
0
The legislative committee overseeing the state health insurance exchange Wednesday questioned the competence of a volunteer board guiding the exchange. Reported by Denver Post 5 hours ago.

The Meaning of Middle Class

$
0
0
On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has said, "We need to make the middle class mean something again." What does being middle class mean to Americans, and has the meaning changed? A review of public opinion on the middle class, from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research archives:

Who considers themselves middle class?

Since the earliest polling, very few Americans have been willing to call themselves either upper or lower class. Most of the country see themselves as middle-class or working class, though preference between those two terms shifts frequently. In 2014, 49% described themselves as middle class and 36% as working class, but just six years earlier, 43% chose middle and 45% working.

What determine class? Money

Class in some countries may be rooted in family background, occupation, or educational level, but for Americans the key driver is money. Income and wealth were cited by the public as the defining class signifiers in surveys across decades, while education and occupation were chosen as key characteristics of class by much lower proportions of the public.

Polls have found majorities consider the specific requirements for inclusion in the middle class to include being able to own a home and save money for the future. A 2013 Pew poll found some traditional social class markers such as a college education (37%) and owning investments (28%) chosen by fewer respondents than items related to financial security, including having a secure job (86%) and health insurance (66%).

The idea that a college degree is not essential to membership in the middle class is borne out by the educational levels of those who describe themselves as middle class. While in 2014 48% of the self-described middle-class had a college degree or more, 43% had only a high school degree or some college. The proportion of the middle class who have a college degree has increased greatly over the last fifty years, the result of greater overall enrollment numbers. However, those diplomas may not carry as much weight as they once did. In 1972, 80% of those who had a college degree described themselves as middle class, and 13% as working class. In 2014, 62% of those with a college degree described themselves as middle class, and 29% as working class.

So class is money - but how much money?

A number of polls have tried to pinpoint the range of income that Americans believe classifies a family as middle class. A 2013 poll found a plurality of 40% believed that a family needed an annual income of $50,000-74,999 to be considered middle class. Thirty-one percent thought a higher income was required, while 20% thought an income under $50,000 sufficient. A 2007 KFF/Harvard/NPR poll found majorities considered those making $50,000 or $60,000 to be middle class, but only a third thought a family making $100,000 would be middle class. When asked the upper level of income that a family could make and still be considered middle class, 57% in a 2013 UConn poll put the limit below $80,000.

Self-perception of class among high-income earners, however, does not necessarily reflect the majority viewpoint. In 2014, 68% of top earners described themselves as middle class, a proportion unchanged from 1972.

Is the middle class in trouble?

Recent polls reflect the conventional wisdom: Americans believe the middle class is struggling. A February 2015 CBS poll found that 71% of the country believes that life for middle class Americans has gotten worse over the past ten years, while only 23% believe it has gotten better, a small increase in negativity from a pre-recession 2007 CBS poll when 30% thought life had gotten better and 59% worse. A 2013 Allstate/National Journal poll found that majorities of Americans believed that the middle class had fewer opportunities to get ahead (52%) and less job and financial security (65%) than their parents' generation. Nearly equal proportions of the remainder believed they had the same or more. The same poll found that 85% of the public believed that over the past few years, the number of Americans who have fallen out of the middle class is greater than the number who have worked their way up into the middle class.

What can the middle class expect?

If life for the middle class has gotten worse, what sort of lifestyle can middle class people reasonably expect to achieve? Strong majorities see home ownership, job security and avoiding debt as realistic for the middle class. But just under half of Americans think that realistically, middle class people are unable to pay for their children's college education, have enough money to deal with a health emergency or job loss, or save enough to retire comfortably. These are the concerns that any politician hoping to make the middle class "mean something again" will need to address.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

Presidential Candidates Want Latino Voters. Here's What Latinos Want From Them

$
0
0
The 2016 Presidential election may be more than a year away but campaign season is in full swing. Two Democrats and six Republicans have already declared their intention to run for president and the list is certain to grow. Campaigns are hiring staff, raising money, and, of course, visiting Iowa. As the candidates and their strategists discuss the "path to victory," it's more than likely that they will debate how to attract Latino voters to their side. Given the important role played by Latino voters in the last two presidential election cycles, the campaigns' interest isn't surprising. The truth is that all of the presidential candidates know that in order win on Election Day, they'll need to energize the Latino electorate. This won't be easy. Some already seem incapable of doing so, either because of their track record or inability to position themselves beyond the narrow confines of their party's primaries. For those seriously focused on winning in November 2016, they should know that there are some issues that are important to majorities of Latinos across the nation; issues that worry Puerto Rican voters in Orlando as much as Mexican-American voters in Las Vegas. They are the issues that Latinos will be looking to as they make their decisions in the months before they help elect the next President. The road to the White House is long and filled with challenges, but when it comes to getting Latino voters on your side, here are five essential things that Latino voters want from their next president.

*Investing in Education*: There is no issue of greater importance to Latinos than education and our community of voters understands that, by and large, our public schools are failing to prepare their children for academic and career success. As such, Latinos are looking for a president who will commit to large-scale interventions to improve their children's education, including the implementation of universal Pre-Kindergarten in cities across America and a plan to invest much greater resources to improve teacher education, access and quality of English Language Learner (ELL) programs, enhance after-school programming, advance community school models, significantly lower college tuition rates and invest in college retention programs for at-risk students.

*Immigration Reform*: When President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama ran for president, they promised to fix our broken immigration system. We're still waiting. In every Latino community in the United States -- whether it's the border regions of the Southwest or the big cities of the East Coast -- millions of Latinos face an uncertain future because Washington has failed to create a workable and humane reform of our immigration laws. Hundreds of thousands of immigrants, many of whom have lived in the United States for years, have been deported. Those deportations may not satisfy some members of Congress, but they have torn apart families, left children without their parents and undercut the economic stability of communities across America. This is a social, economic and moral crisis that requires immediate action from the next president. Latinos are looking for a presidential candidate who will stop the deportations, uphold and expand President Obama's executive actions on immigration, and rally Congress to pass a fair and just immigration reform bill that includes a path to citizenship. Nothing less will do.

*Obamacare*: For all of the perceived and real shortcomings of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Latino families now are more likely to have health coverage than ever before. In fact, more than 4.2 million Latinos have gained insurance through this health law over the past two years. After spending years worrying whether they were one illness away from financial ruin, the last thing Latinos want to hear from candidates is that they want to go back to the "good old pre-Obamacare days" when more than one-third of Latinos lacked health insurance. Latinos are looking for candidates willing to discuss expansions of coverage for a greater number of people and improvements in preventative care. So, for those candidates strongly opposed to Obamacare, what's your plan? If you're running simply on a platform to turn back the clock and "repeal Obamacare," Latinos will run the other way.

*Promoting Economic Opportunity*: The Great Recession decimated Latino families' wealth. In virtually every Latino community in the United States, the contraction of the economy meant lay-offs, increased indebtedness and diminished home values. As the economy has slowly begun to recover, so too have some Latino families. But the impact of the financial crisis has had powerful consequences on Latino households and all too many families find themselves barely getting by. The next president has the power to make an immediate difference in the lives of these families by committing to raise the federal minimum wage to $12.00 by 2020. In addition to raising the minimum wage, the next president must push for legislation that guarantees pay equality for America's women. Latinas are paid just 54 cents on the dollar compared to non-Hispanic White workers. Latinos want to hear how these candidates plan to change that and promote greater economic security and mobility for working families, including opportunities to grow small businesses, increase homeownership, participate in job training initiatives and strengthen income support programs.

*Environment and Climate Change*: Studies and polls show that Latinos are deeply concerned about pollution and support regulations that protect our natural resources. This means the next president can win over Latinos by clearly advocating for strong environmental protections. For example, more than 70 percent of Latino respondents in Colorado, New Mexico, Florida and Illinois support the Clean Water Act and the protection of wetlands. Why? Latinos often live in urban settings where green areas are sparse, and suffer from chronic illnesses such as asthma and diabetes. Another key issue area for Latinos is climate change. Latinos disproportionately suffer its effects because we are much more likely to work outdoors than not, and because many of us live in coastal areas. Because of this, more than three-fourths (77 percent) of Latino voters believe that global climate change is already happening -- impressive when compared to the general public (52 percent). Hispanics are also more likely to support policies aimed at curbing it. In summary, Latinos want to hear that our next President cares about our natural resources, and is ready to fight for them -- and against climate change -- using all the tools available.

Elections, as we know, have consequences. And the consequences of next year's presidential elections are all too clear to Latino voters. That's why they'll be looking and listening very closely to the candidates for president. Let's hope for their sake that the announced candidates -- and the ones soon to follow -- will be looking very closely at Latino voters and their families and speaking to the issues that matter most to them.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 4 hours ago.

Greenberg Traurig Expands Its Texas Presence with Nine New Attorneys

$
0
0
Continuing its strategic growth in Texas, the international law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP has recently added a top-tier team of nine attorneys across various practice areas including real estate, labor and employment, intellectual property, litigation, and health care.

Houston (PRWEB) May 13, 2015

Continuing its strategic growth in Texas, the international law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP has recently added a top-tier team of nine attorneys across various practice areas including real estate, labor and employment, intellectual property, litigation, and health care. The attorneys, whose experience further enhances the firm’s highly regarded multi-practice capabilities, include shareholders John J. Tucker and Shira R. Yoshor, along with associates Janis E. Clements, Hampton D. Crow, Jr., Alan W. Hersh, Banee Pachuca, Amy E. Simcox, David A. Walker, and Theresa M. Wanat.

“We are very pleased to welcome new shareholders John Tucker and Shira Yoshor. John is an experienced real estate attorney and will further expand Greenberg Traurig’s already robust real estate capabilities in Texas. Shira is a skilled attorney with extensive experience in a wide range of industries, and will significantly enhance our employment law capabilities in Texas. We also welcome seven associates, and are confident they will add real value to our Texas team of more than 100 lawyers,” said Douglas C. Atnipp, Greenberg Traurig co-regional operating shareholder for Texas. “Our firm is focused on sustained growth in Texas, adding talented attorneys who offer significant experience in high-demand industries and practices. Greenberg Traurig continues to grow strategically in areas that reflect current market needs and economic growth within the region.”

"At Greenberg Traurig, Real Estate is a significant and valued practice area. I am thrilled to join such a premier real estate practice,” said Tucker. “I also relish Greenberg's broad, global platform and resources which will allow me to expand to my practice."

“I am excited to join Greenberg Traurig because I‘m impressed by the firm’s breadth and scope, subject-wise and geographically,” Yoshor explained. “Greenberg’s collaborative culture fosters great professional opportunities in a collegial environment.”

Tucker, a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig’s Dallas office, focuses his practice on a variety of real estate matters, including commercial mortgage loan originations, securitizations, workouts and restructurings, mezzanine, subordinate and pari passu financings, as well as whole loan sales, participations, splits, and syndications. He represents funds, investment banks, commercial banks, and other institutional lenders. John is experienced in dealing with mortgage loan origination, including conduit as well as portfolio loans, involving, among things, credit-tenant leases and leasehold financings (including sublease financings); sale-leasebacks, master leases, multi-borrower, multi-property and multi-state financings; tenants-in-common borrowing structures; mezzanine and subordinate debt, and preferred equity. He handles acquisitions and dispositions of distressed assets, including the representation of buyers and servicers in workouts, foreclosures, discounted payoffs, and REO sales. Tucker received his J.D. from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law and B.A. from University of Alabama.

Yoshor, a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig’s Houston office, focuses her practice on labor and employment matters and a wide variety of complex commercial litigation. She is experienced in representing management in virtually all aspects of labor and employment law. Yoshor regularly counsels employers on managing workplace issues; drafts employment agreements, handbooks and policies; drafts and litigates non-competition and non-disclosure agreements; and investigates claims and complaints by employees. She has defended individual and multi-party claims before courts and arbitrators around the country. Yoshor also has broad experience in complex commercial cases of various types. Yoshor received her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School and her B.A. from Yeshiva University.

Clements, an associate in Greenberg Traurig’s Austin office, focuses her practice on commercial litigation, antitrust, complex business litigation, patent litigation, licensing, and energy and natural resources law. She earned her J.D. from St. Mary's University School of Law, her M.A. from The University of Texas at Austin, and her B.S. from Texas Christian University.

Crow, an associate in Greenberg Traurig’s Dallas office, focuses his practice on general real estate matters and represents institutional and commercial lenders in the origination of real estate loans intended for securitization and sale in the secondary market. He earned his J.D. from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law and B.B.A. from Baylor University.

Hersh, an associate in Greenberg Traurig’s Austin office, focuses on litigation and has handled asset purchase negotiations, lien and land restrictions on client holdings, immigration issues, and criminal appeals. Prior to joining the firm, he was an attorney for the Third District of the Texas Court of Appeals. Hersh received his J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law and his B.A. from The University of Texas.

Pachuca, an associate in Greenberg Traurig’s Dallas office, focuses her practice on health care matters and issues related to regulatory compliance laws, including the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, the Stark Act, the Controlled Substances Act, the Texas Pharmacy Act, and the Federal Anti-Kickback Act. She has a broad range of experience representing health care providers and employers in resolving business disputes over breach of contracts, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission cases, and Office of Civil Rights investigations. Pachuca advises her clients on planning corporate transactions and ensuring compliance with FDA guidelines and state and federal disclosure laws. Pachuca received her J.D. from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law and her B.S. from the University of Houston.

Simcox, an associate in the Greenberg Traurig’s Dallas office, focuses her practice on real estate matters, including acquisition, development, leasing, financing, and sale of real estate projects for commercial, industrial, senior-housing, and multifamily housing facilities. She counsels commercial lenders in connection with complex real estate financing involving low income housing tax credit and municipal bond financing. Simcox also advises financial institutions and mortgage lenders with respect to federal and state banking laws and regulations, including analysis of newly enacted or proposed legislation. She is experienced in dealing with multifamily lenders in construction, permanent financing, and refinancing transactions with Federal Housing Administration, Fannie Mae, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Rural Housing Service. Simcox, who recently relocated to Dallas, is admitted in Indiana, but not yet admitted in Texas. Simcox received her J.D. from Indiana University School of Law and her B.S and B.A. from Rice University.

Walker, an associate in the Greenberg Traurig’s Houston office, focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation matters. He is experienced in dealing with international patent applications for energy technologies, including data acquisition, signal processing, and mechanical engineering. Walker represents major oil industry clients in licensing, litigation support, and due diligence reviews for mergers and acquisitions. He is also experienced in dealing with freedom-to-operate opinions, MSAs, negotiation and client advocacy, litigation for contract and non-disclosure agreement enforcement, immigration, and domestic and international employment matters. Walker received his J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center, his M.S. from the University of Wyoming, and his B.S. from the University of Oklahoma.

Wanat, an associate in the Greenberg Traurig’s Houston office, focuses her practice on litigation matters, including environmental, real estate, and personal injury issues. She is experienced handling business disputes, industrial accidents and fatalities, environmental cost recovery matters, residential and commercial adverse possession disputes, and insurance matters involving property and casualty claims. Wanat received her J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center and her B.A. from the University of Michigan.

About Greenberg Traurig, LLP – Texas

Greenberg Traurig has more than 100 attorneys in Texas, serving clients from offices in Austin, Dallas and Houston.

About Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Greenberg Traurig, LLP is an international, multi-practice law firm with approximately 1800 attorneys serving clients from 37 offices in the United States, Latin America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The firm is among the “Power Elite” in the 2014 BTI Client Relationship Scorecard report, which assesses the nature and strength of law firms' client relationships. For additional information, please visit http://www.gtlaw.com. Reported by PRWeb 2 hours ago.

Nancy Pelosi Predicts GOP Ruin On Obamacare Case

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi predicted Wednesday that Republicans will "rue the day" if the Supreme Court buys their arguments and invalidates tax subsidies for millions of people under President Barack Obama's health care law.

Republicans have said they will try to ensure people don't lose insurance if the high court rules this summer against tax subsidies for health care coverage in certain states. But they haven't said how they would do it. Such a ruling would present a major challenge to the GOP. Without a congressional fix some 8 million people could lose subsidies, which help them pay for their health insurance.

"They're now going to then go out and say we're going to take subsidies away from people who have health care?" Pelosi said in an interview with The Associated Press in her office overlooking the Supreme Court. "No, I don't think so."

The California Democrat, who was House speaker when the health bill became law in 2010 and was a major force behind its passage, insisted that the law was ironclad constitutionally and would not be overturned.

"I don't think it's going to happen so it's no use speculating on what I don't think is going to happen. But it would be bad news for them, it would be really bad news for them," she said of Republicans.

Nearly 8 million people could lose up to $24 billion a year in health insurance subsidies depending on the outcome of the Supreme Court case, King v. Burwell, which focuses on the literal wording of the complex law. Opponents say it only allows subsidies in states that set up their own insurance exchanges. Only 13 states and Washington, D.C., are running their own online insurance markets; other states rely on federal marketplaces, and tax subsidies in those marketplaces would be threatened if the court rules against the administration.

Pelosi said she knew the law well and that opponents were relying on a phrase taken "out of context" in pressing their case before the court.

If Republicans who oppose the law get the Supreme Court ruling they want, the onus would be on the GOP-led Congress to come up with a fix. It's not at all clear how they could do that in a way acceptable to the Obama administration and politically palatable to GOP voters heading into a presidential election year.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 1 hour ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images