Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Veterinary Pet Insurance Teams with NY Jets' Eric Decker and Country Music Singer Jessie James Decker to Help Fund the Rescue, Training and Uniting of Shelter Dogs with Disabled Veterans

$
0
0
Veterinary Pet Insurance Teams with NY Jets' Eric Decker and Country Music Singer Jessie James Decker to Help Fund the Rescue, Training and Uniting of Shelter Dogs with Disabled Veterans BREA, Calif., April 29, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Veterinary Pet Insurance Co. (VPI), the nation's first and largest provider of pet health insurance, commemorates Pet Parent's Day® on May 3 by teaming up with the Eric and Jessie Decker Foundation in support of Deckers Dogs. A... Reported by PR Newswire 7 hours ago.

Zane Benefits Creates Quiz to Determine What Health Benefits Fits Your Small Business

$
0
0
Interested in health benefits for your small business? Take this quiz to determine the best fit.

Salt Lake City, Ut (PRWEB) April 29, 2015

Zane Benefits, the leader in individual health insurance reimbursement for small businesses announces ‘Quiz - What Type of Health Benefits Would Best Fit Your Business?’ Offering health insurance benefits is important to many small businesses, but not every business knows what the options are. This quiz helps small business owners determine what type of benefits are appropriate and feasible for their employees.

Take this simple, 6 question quiz to evaluate the needs of employees and their families. After completing the quiz, keep reading for additional resources based on the results.

For more information visit: ZaneBenefits.com.

EDITORS NOTE: Rick Lindquist is available for questions from the media through Zane Benefits. Contact Jessica Welker at (435) 275-4507 or media(at)zanebenefits(dot)com

###

About Zane Benefits:

Zane Benefits is the leader in individual health insurance reimbursement for small businesses. Since 2006, Zane Benefits has been on a mission to bring the benefits of individual health insurance to business owners and their employees.

Zane Benefits' software helps businesses reimburse employees for individual health insurance plans for annual savings of 20 to 60 percent compared with traditional employer-provided health insurance. Today, over 20,000 customers use Zane Benefits' software, services, and support to reimburse individual health insurance plans purchased independent of employment. For more information visit ZaneBenefits.com. Reported by PRWeb 7 hours ago.

Insurers Hire a Liberal Congresswoman to Lead Their Newest Phony Front Group

$
0
0
The health insurance industry took advantage of Washington's infamous revolving door last week when it named former Rep. Allyson Schwartz of Pennsylvania, perceived by many to be a liberal Democrat, as the face of its latest K Street-operated front group.

Schwartz, a former five-term member of Congress who made an unsuccessful bid for Pennsylvania governor last year, announced in an email blast Tuesday that she had found work again, not back home but back inside the Beltway. "Today I will begin as President and CEO of the Better Medicare Alliance," she told her "friends and supporters."

The Better Medicare Alliance is a so-called 501(c)(3) nonprofit that appears to have been created with funding from insurance companies by APCO Worldwide, a Washington influence firm with a long history of running front groups for its clients. I worked with APCO on several projects during my years at Cigna.

The Better Medicare Alliance's raison d'etre is to widen the federal spigot of taxpayer dollars already gushing into the bank accounts of insurance companies that operate Medicare Advantage plans, those privately run alternatives to traditional Medicare. Enrollment is concentrated in a small number of companies, among the biggest of which are for-profit insurers UnitedHealth Group, Humana and Aetna.

As the Center for Public Integrity has reported extensively over the past year, the federal government for years has overpaid Medicare Advantage insurers, which has enabled the companies to better reward their shareholders. Insurance firms have also used the overpayments to add benefits not covered by traditional Medicare, like hearing aids, and to offer lower copayments.

Insurers that participate in the Medicare Advantage program devote big chunks of their advertising and sales budgets to lure seniors away from the traditional Medicare program, which costs taxpayers less. For many seniors, the marketing is irresistible. Enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans jumped 10 percent between 2013 and 2014. Thirty percent of Medicare's 54 million beneficiaries are now in a Medicare Advantage plan.

Insurers insist that Medicare Advantage plans represent a good value for seniors and the country. They say, for example, that because of the managed care techniques they use, they are better able to coordinate care for seniors with chronic conditions.

A downside rarely mentioned is that many doctors and health care facilities, including nursing homes, refuse to participate in Medicare Advantage provider networks. Other providers that might want to participate are often excluded. My own mother didn't fully appreciate the consequences of her Medicare Advantage plan's limited network until recently. She decided to switch back to traditional Medicare so she could go to a nursing home of her choice with high quality ratings.

"The purpose of the Better Medicare Alliance is to bring together a national coalition of health plans, providers, advocates and beneficiaries to support and strengthen Medicare Advantage," wrote Schwartz. Despite being a favorite of Emily's List and other liberal groups, Schwartz received a third of the $16 million she raised in campaign contributions during her career from people and companies in health care and insurance and from "lawyers and lobbyists," according to OpenSecrets.org.

Having worked with numerous front groups in the past, I'm betting that the real purpose of the Better Medicare Alliance is to strengthen the profits of health insurers, many of whom contributed to her various campaigns, by making sure that proposed cuts to Medicare Advantage plans never get implemented.

Even though the Better Medicare Alliance lists several nonprofit organizations as allies on its website (and gives them equal billing to Aetna, Humana and UnitedHealth Group), I recognized many of them--the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Retail Federation and the Healthcare Leadership Council--as groups ever ready to aid and abet the insurance industry.

As an industry executive, I worked with every one of them during the various campaigns we waged whenever a proposed law or regulation surfaced somewhere that might have hurt profits. Know this, though: while those organizations were willing to lend their names to give our front groups the appearance of being genuine coalitions, they expected us to kick in most if not all of the money to cover the front groups' expenses.

So how can I be so sure the Better Medicare Alliance is a front group, aside from the mention of the usual suspects as allies? There are these other tell-tale signs: no listing of a physical address or phone number on its website; no mention of employees other than Schwartz; no board of directors (I wanted to know who actually hired Schwartz and who she answers to); no apparent way to reach anyone there other than through a generic email address. (The questions I submitted to the group last Wednesday have still not been answered.)

I did finally find the name of a real person, someone I had worked with often during my days in the industry, not on the group's website but on its press releases. He's Bill Pierce. Senior Director of, you guessed it, APCO Worldwide.

This was published initially by the Center for Public Integrity. You can find more about Wendell Potter here.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 6 hours ago.

Economic Insecurity: A Major Concern

$
0
0
In informal encounters with regular folks, the "everyday" Americans Hillary Clinton says she is running for, I gained the impression that there is an issue on their minds which no political leader is addressing. It seems that many Americans are anxious about their economic futures, a generalized anxiety that goes beyond being concerned about one or another facet of their lives. I found a leading pollster, Anna Greenberg, and with the help of her and her organization, I checked my impression.

Here is what we found: the majority of Americans indeed experience an acute sense of economic anxiety. Americans are most concerned that Social Security will not be there when they retire. They also fear that they will not have enough money of their own when their working days are over. Indeed, even for now, the majority feels it may not have enough money to pay the bills and -- that they may lose their jobs. A majority also is concerned it will be unable to afford health insurance.

Economic anxiety cuts across party lines and speaks to people of all camps. The small differences in the anxiety score support this conclusion: the mean score is 6.7 for Democrats, 6.6 for Independents and 6.4 for Republicans. Compare this to inequality: a 2014 poll found 90 percent of Democrats favor government action to reduce inequality, compared to 69 percent of Independents and 45 percent of Republicans. Moreover, to reduce poverty, a majority of Democrats favored higher taxes and expanded programs for the poor, while a majority of Republicans favored lower taxes to encourage investment and growth.

In contrast, our political leaders often speak in very general terms and address more policy wonks than the people I met and polled. Thus, typically President Obama calls for "growing the middle class", for increasing investment in infrastructure and in education. I wonder if the term "infrastructure" speaks to many Americans. And if they are as concerned about the bridges, roads, and pipelines as they are about their homes, jobs, and retirement? And if they are -- do they realize the trillion dollars or so it would take just to bring the infrastructure up to date after decades of neglect? As for education, surely all parents, grandparents, and young people are concerned about it and their fellow citizens. However, after decades of repeated promises to reform schools, do most Americans believe that now, this time, we will finally find a handle on this vexing problem?

Hillary Clinton, we read, "has not yet settled on a specific platform" but she is expected to embrace several principles. "They include standard Democratic initiatives like raising the minimum wage, investing in infrastructure, closing corporate tax loopholes and cutting taxes for the middle class. Other ideas are newer, such as providing incentives to corporations to increase profit-sharing with employees and changing labor laws to give workers more collective bargaining power." Sounds fine to me, but it may seem well too wonkish and abstract to the anxious majority.

Republican candidates do not seem to be immune, at least in this stage of the campaign, to talking in vague generalizations and seeking to please wonks rather than anxious people. Thus Jeb Bush told The New York Times that "working-class Americans would benefit from simplifying the tax code, overhauling immigration, embracing the country's new energy sources, and improving the education system."

To be fair: if one combs carefully through the many speeches and press releases made by Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, and others, one can find statements that echo the oppressive economic anxiety that the majority of Americans experience. However, no party and no candidates seem to raise this issue as a major concern of their campaign and above all, none has offered a credible set of solutions in terms accessible to most voters. Stay tuned.
_______________

Amitai Etzioni is a University Professor at The George Washington University and author of The New Normal: Finding a Balance between Individual Rights and the Common Good. For more information, you can follow him on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. For more details about the study cited, please visit: www.icps.gwu.edu

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 5 hours ago.

Report: Insurers skirt health law's protections for women

$
0
0
CHICAGO (AP) — Some insurance plans offered on the health overhaul law's new marketplaces violate the law's requirements for women's health, according to a new report from a women's legal advocacy group. The National Women's Law Center analyzed plans in 15 states over two years and found some excluded dependents from maternity coverage, prohibited coverage of breast pumps or failed to cover all federally approved birth control methods. To use highly selective anecdotes to draw sweeping conclusions about consumers' coverage does nothing to improve the quality, accessibility, or affordability of health care for individuals and families, she said. Health and Human Service Department spokeswoman Katie Hill said the Obama administration takes "reports of non-compliance very seriously," will continue to provide guidance to insurers and states, and "will explore whether additional measures are necessary." Under the health law, most health insurance plans must cover all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives as preventive care for women, free to the patient. Reported by SeattlePI.com 6 hours ago.

Anthem Sees Good Times Ahead As Customers Flood In

$
0
0
The health-insurance company has benefited greatly from healthcare reform. Reported by Motley Fool 5 hours ago.

Former Pharmacist and Stroke Victim Writes about the Failures of the Healthcare Industry

$
0
0
Author Fritz Scheffel Reveals the Truth about HealthCare in His New Controversial Book

Atlanta, GA (PRWEB) April 29, 2015

How well do citizens understand what defines their health? Can they wake up one morning and make the decision to purchase good health? Where would they go? These are questions Fritz Scheffel answers in his new book, HealthScare: Why Healthcare Is NOT About Your Health. Scheffel argues that the federal government and health insurance companies have many times led the public to believe that having “healthcare” can make them healthy. Although healthcare is presented as a means to good health, it often negatively effects actual medical care--decimating health professionals’ ability to treat their patients effectively and at a reasonable cost.

HealthScare details the history and ultimate failure of government and insurance involvement in the health industry. Using over four decades of experience in the health industry as a pharmacist, Fritz Scheffel argues that American citizens can make the health system efficient, cost effective, and beneficial to all by regaining power over their own health from power-hungry politicians.

“I want to help everyone understand the truths about health care so we can all be healthier,” explains Scheffel. “What are the health issues you deal with now, or will have to deal with in the future?”

With HealthScare, Fritz Scheffel offers a balanced and honest appraisal of the history and politics of the health industry; Fritz Scheffel provides readers a path to saving their health and, ultimately, the nation.
HealthScare: Why Health Care Is NOT About Your Health is available through Amazon and HealthScareBook.com

About Fritz Scheffel:
Fritz Scheffel is a writer that confronts the health industry from the inside—using his forty years of working experience as a pharmacist—and from the outside—from his several years as a stroke patient. The author of numerous books on the health care system, pre- and post-Affordable-Care-Act, including Health Care: It Can Be Fixed and Health Care 911: A Health Care Crisis That Did Not Have to Happen. Reported by PRWeb 5 hours ago.

A.M. Best Downgrades Ratings of Assurant, Inc.’s Health Insurance Subsidiaries

$
0
0
A.M. Best Downgrades Ratings of Assurant, Inc.’s Health Insurance Subsidiaries OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A.M. Best has downgraded the financial strength rating to B++ (Good) from A- (Excellent) and the issuer credit ratings to “bbb+” from “a-” of the health insurance subsidiaries of Assurant, Inc. (Assurant) (headquartered in New York, NY) [NYSE: AIZ], Time Insurance Company and John Alden Life Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Assurant Health and domiciled in Milwaukee, WI). The outlook for the ratings is stable. The actions follow Assurant’s recent an Reported by Business Wire 5 hours ago.

Work Wellness Programs May Soon Include Genetic Testing

$
0
0
Your employer may one day help determine if your genes are why your jeans have become too snug.

Big companies are considering blending genetic testing with coaching on nutrition and exercise to help workers lose weight and improve their health before serious conditions like diabetes or heart disease develop. It's a step beyond the typical corporate wellness programs that many companies are using to make workers more aware of their risk factors and improve their health. Genetic testing in corporate wellness programs also is relatively uncharted territory. Many employers and insurers cover these tests and counseling for medical reasons, like helping people determine if they are more prone to certain cancers. And earlier this year, President Obama asked Congress to approve spending on medical research into using a patient's genes to tailor care.

Mixing generic testing into a wellness program may create a tool attractive to employers desperate to cut health care costs, one of the biggest expenses in a company's budget. But employee benefits experts have doubts that such a novel approach will gain momentum. It first has to conquer steep challenges like employee worry about sharing such sensitive information and employer skepticism about its effectiveness.

"They are waiting for evidence that this genetic testing will change risks," said Dr. Jeff Levin-Scherz, a senior consultant with the benefits consulting firm Towers Watson.

Sparking the push to add genetic testing into corporate wellness offerings is a new program from the health insurer Aetna and Newtopia, a small Canadian company that creates personalized health-improvement programs. Their offering uses data from initial wellness program steps like physicals or blood tests to figure out which employees are vulnerable to metabolic syndrome.

That's a group of conditions like high blood sugar, poor cholesterol or a big waistline that, when they occur together, increase a patient's risk for heart disease, stroke and diabetes.

Those people are invited to get testing that analyzes a narrow band of genes that can tell patients things like how their body processes carbohydrates or fats, or if they have a genetic marker tied to compulsive eating. Patients then work with a coach to combine that information with a plan to improve their health.

Aetna and Newtopia are selling their program to the insurer's biggest employer customers, and they are seeking to sign up to six companies this year. Spokeswoman Michelle Grant said the cost for companies will be on par with other disease prevention programs that attempt to improve a person's health using live, individual coaching and apps. She did not provide specifics.

Aetna appears to have this niche to itself for now. None of the other major health insurers in the United States offer genetic testing as part of a wellness program.

The new program was tested on employees at Aetna and The Jackson Laboratory, a Bar Harbor, Maine, company. Scott Craig, a maintenance worker at the laboratory, decided to give the test a shot last year because his weight had soared to 335 pounds and his blood pressure and blood sugar levels were up.

The 53-year-old mailed a saliva sample in for analysis. The result? He has no genetic traits that help explain his weight gain.

"In other words, I got nothing to blame," he said. "Finding that out, oddly enough, seemed to motivate me."

Craig connected with the program's health coach, who helped him figure out how to squeeze in exercise three times a week and improve his diet. Newtopia also started sending personalized vitamin supplements and offering online contests that taught Craig how to track his daily activities and think of everything he did as a way to burn calories.

Craig was one of 130 laboratory employees invited to try the program. A total of 28 started. More than a year later, only 19 still participate. Most have lost 7 percent of their body weight or more, said Wayne Gregersen, who works in the company's compensation and benefits department.

Gregersen, who estimates that the program costs $400 to $600 more per person than a similar, high-end health coaching option, liked the results. But he said the company must learn why participation was so low, especially since the laboratory focuses on genetic research.

He also said he has a hard time understanding the value of genetic testing but plans to give the Aetna-Newtopia program another year.

It may take several years before a company sees a drop in health care costs from changed employee behavior, said Rose Stanley, a practice leader at WorldatWork, a nonprofit human resources association.

Companies have to attract workers who will not only realize that they have a problem but also will work to fix it even if they fail at first, Stanley said.

But before companies can even see results, they have to sign up employees. That's a challenge for any wellness program, let alone one that includes genetic testing.

Many employees just don't like sharing personal details, and genetic information carries a lot of potential for abuse, said Lisa Schlager, a vice president of community affairs with Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, a non-profit advocacy group for people with hereditary dispositions to cancer.

She said any genetic information collected for a wellness program should be used in a limited scope, and the plan must come with strong protections to keep employers from seeing an individual's results and penalizing workers.

"That's where people are starting to get a little nervous," she said.

Newtopia runs the wellness program and doesn't share an individual's results with either the employer or the insurer, company CEO Jeff Ruby said.

A federal law also protects against genetic discrimination in health insurance and employment.

In addition to employee concerns, there are questions about whether genetic testing can be helpful in dealing with metabolic syndrome. Mayo Clinic endocrinologist Dr. Michael Jensen says, as far as he knows, genetic testing isn't used as part of care.

He said genetic factors linked to obesity are hard to analyze, and more than 95 percent of weight gain is tied to factors like diet or exercise.

"Genes don't explain that much of the variability," he said.

Still, genetic testing could motivate some to improve their health, even if it sheds little light on their condition. Craig, the Jackson Laboratory worker, has dropped 50 pounds since he started working with his health coach.

"I've come a long way since then," he said. "Two hundred eighty five pounds may sound like a lot to you, but to me it's really good."

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 3 hours ago.

Push to expand health care coverage to poor killed by Louisiana Senate panel

$
0
0
A Senate health panel killed legislation Wednesday (April 29) that would effectively expand Medicaid coverage for approximately 290,000 needy people in Louisiana without health insurance. After about an hour-and-a-half of testimony that ended with the sponsor of the legislation, Sen.... Reported by nola.com 2 hours ago.

Public Attitudes About Mental Health

$
0
0
Mental health care in the U.S. underwent significant changes over the past decade. New regulations mandated increases in mental health coverage, while state budget cuts for mental health services have resulted in the largest total cuts to such spending since the 1970s. But what does the public think -- how important do they think mental health problems are and how much do such issues affect their lives? From the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research archives:

*Experience of Mental Health Issues*

Pollsters face a dilemma when asking about an issue as sensitive as personal experience with mental illness. Significant underreporting is to be expected. But even given this caveat, polling reveals that Americans have a great deal of personal experience with mental illness.

The proportion of Americans reporting that they know someone who suffers from a mental health problem has stayed surprisingly consistent, despite increased willingness to discuss such issues. About a third of the country reported knowing someone with a mental illness in both the 1950s and the 1990s, while more recent polls found about six in ten have ever known someone who received treatment or was hospitalized for a mental illness. Polls in the last decade have found as many as one in six reporting having experienced a mental health problem themselves.*Mental health as a health problem*

Given widespread personal experience, it is not surprising that a majority see mental illness as a serious public health problem. A 2013 Pew poll found that 67 percent of the public believed that mental illness was an extremely or very serious public health problem. Moreover, a 2006 Parade/Research!America poll found that, though nearly everyone (89 percent) believed that physical and mental health were equally important, two-thirds believed that physical health was treated with greater importance in our current health care system.

But questions about how mental health ranks as a public health problem imply that these conditions are primarily health issues, a categorization that some of the public has shown reluctance to make in historical polls, which reveal uncertainty over the role personality and character play in mental health problems. As recently as 1996, more than half the country believed that depression was a sign of personal or emotional weakness, while only 38 percent described it as a health problem. More recent polls have not delved deeper into this idea, but instead have asked whether seeking treatment for such issues is a sign of weakness. On this point, Americans in polls in the early 2000s were certain -- fewer than one in five said treatment indicates weakness.*Stigma of mental illness*

In a 1978 General Mills/Yankelovich, Skelly & White poll of adult members of families, 81 percent said they welcomed the "more open talk" in society about mental illness. Despite the lauded increase in openness, a majority of Americans continue to perceive a stigma attached to mental illness decades later -- 82 percent in a 2002 poll. A 55 percent majority in a 2004 Parade/Research!America poll, however, did think that the stigma around depression specifically had been lifted in recent years.

Americans don't just perceive stigma around mental illness, a substantial share also admit to having negative feelings about the mentally ill. Substantial proportions report they would feel at least somewhat uncomfortable working with or living next to someone with a serious mental illness, while two-thirds of parents would feel uncomfortable if someone with such a problem worked in their child's school.

*Treatment of mental health issues: Drugs*

Prozac was approved for treatment of depression in the U.S. in 1987 and quickly transformed the world of antidepressants. The success of this drug and others that followed prompted a national discussion about the value of medications to manage mental health issues. In a 1996 poll, 41 percent of Americans believed that depression could be successfully treated by medication almost all or most of the time. Interestingly, a somewhat larger share (58 percent) believed that depression could be successfully treated by therapy and counseling most of the time. A similar pattern was found in a poll the same year on anxiety disorders. By 2005, 42 percent of the public believed that prescription drugs developed over the past 20 years had made a big difference in the lives of people with mental illness.

*Treatment of mental health issues: Mental health professionals*

Americans may believe in the potential value of therapy, but a substantial minority has viewed practitioners with skepticism, with 38 percent in a 2004 poll saying they believed most therapists are in need of therapy themselves. Although the ratings for honesty and ethical standards of psychiatrists have improved slightly since the 1970s, the field's reputation is at best middling compared to other health professionals. In 2012, psychiatrists received lower ratings than doctors, nurses, pharmacists and even dentists.

*Costs and coverage for mental health issues*

93 percent of the public in a 1997 National Mental Health Association/Opinion Research Corporation International said that health insurance companies should provide the same coverage for mental health problems as they did for physical health problems. But at the time, few reported having insurance with such coverage. Only 35 percent of the country, in a 1996 National Mental Health Association/Wirthlin Group, believed that mental health services would be mostly covered by their insurance, while 30 percent believed coverage would be partial. A 2006 American Psychological Association/National Women's Health Resource Center/iVillage poll similarly found only 29 percent believed their insurance offered full benefits for mental health services. This failure of coverage may explain why, despite indications that Americans believe in the efficacy of therapy, a 43 percent plurality in a 2004 Psychology Today/PacifiCare Behavioral Health poll said that the costs of therapy generally outweigh the benefits.

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) addressed these issues by requiring group health plans and health insurance issuers to provide mental health benefits in parity with other medical benefits. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) further increased availability of mental health coverage by requiring that most health plans cover mental health services. Americans may have supported these changes, but unfortunately, many don't appear to know about them. 38 percent of the public in a 2013 Kaiser poll were aware of requirements for parity of mental health services, while 40 percent believed insurance companies could have separate rules for mental health benefits.

Despite these changes, 12 percent of Americans in 2013 reported that they or a household family member had problems getting mental health care in the last year because of costs. Unfortunately, with state budgets for mental health care continuing to be cut, many more people in need of help may have trouble getting it.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 59 minutes ago.

Cornell Administrators Embark On Criminal Investigation Of Student Activists

$
0
0
Students at Cornell University say school administrators and police have called in multiple student activists for "interrogations" about recent protests, and threatened at least one activist with a felony burglary charge.

The reason for the university's actions, according to both activists and administrators, was to ensure there would be no disruptive demonstrations during Charter Day weekend, a celebration of the school's 150th anniversary that took place April 25 through 27. The activists accuse school officials of attempting to intimidate them, while Cornell officials say they were making an effort to be transparent with activists and warn them about the possible consequences of creating a disturbance.

"They were emailing individual protesters, or people they believe to be involved, to ensure that their birthday party isn't interrupted," said Alex Brown, a Ph.D. student and activist at Cornell.

Students have been protesting against a new $350 health services fee since it was announced in February. Beginning next school year, the fee will be imposed on all students who do not use the Cornell Student Health Insurance Plan -- about 70 percent of undergrads, according to the university. Two demonstrations against the fee took place on Feb. 9 and March 26.

"They really went berserk last week," Brown said of administrators. "Regardless of their intention, the impact on us is there's an overblown police investigation into a really minor incident."

The incident in question is alleged to have taken place the morning of March 26. That's when police say a group of student activists broke into an amphitheater where the Cornell Board of Trustees would be meeting later that day. Police accuse the activists of unlawfully entering an audiovisual room in the amphitheater and using a computer to display an image critical of the board of trustees on a TV monitor in the room. Police say the activists also hung homemade posters in the room that were critical of the university.

Last week, an investigator with the Cornell University Police Department interviewed senior Daniel Marshall about the alleged events at the amphitheater, as well as about a demonstration against the health fee by activists. Marshall had written a March 17 op-ed critical of the trustees in The Cornell Daily Sun.

According to audio of one interview obtained by The Huffington Post, the investigator read Marshall his Miranda rights and then began asking him questions pertaining to the activists' organizational activities. Marshall was told the CUPD had enough information through DNA, fingerprints, witnesses and security footage to slap him with a class D felony burglary charge, as well as misdemeanor counts of unlawful use of a computer and trespassing.

"I've got enough to do it right now. I don't want to. Your cooperation is going to reduce that," the investigating officer said, according to the audio. "If you cooperate with me, you are not going to get charged with burglary. If you do not cooperate with me, I'm going to charge you with burglary." The officer added that he would most likely take Marshall out of one of his classes in handcuffs within a week.

Activists said the officer later told another student that the alleged crime involved a photo posted to the "Save the Pass" Facebook group on the day of the Cornell trustees' meeting. That photo showed TV monitors and a projector in the amphitheater displaying a "Welcome the Trustees" image. In addition, according to the activists' website, the officer supposedly said that several posters affiliated with the protest had been hung in the amphitheater, and confirmed to one activist's lawyer that no property had been damaged.
[CITE: https://www.facebook.com/tcatsavethepass/photos/a.741840999199842.1073741828.740898139294128/924002597650347/?type=1]Posted by Save the Pass on Thursday, March 26, 2015

The officer who spoke to Marshall told him that the burglary charge would bring a minimum of three years' incarceration if he was convicted, according to the audio. "I've got you dead to nuts on it," the officer told Marshall, advising him to consult with an attorney immediately.

The activists say the burglary charge hinges on alleging that the doors to the amphitheater, and the AV room within it, were locked at the time of entry, and that students would have had to break the locks to enter. The activists claim on their website that "these doors are left open all night. If they had been locked that particular night for some reason, there would have been no way of breaking in without breaking the entire door, as the locks are electronic."

"We have enough evidence to say the room was locked at the time," Cathy Zoner, Cornell chief of police, told HuffPost on Wednesday. She added that regardless of whether a lock was broken or not, the students did not have lawful access to the room or the computer. Zoner said that for the sake of transparency, students were told about the charges that CUPD is investigating.

Susan Murphy, Cornell's vice president for student and academic services, and Mary Opperman, vice president for human resources and safety services, also invited several student activists who'd signed campus newspaper op-eds to meet ahead of Charter Day weekend.

Hundreds of volunteers planned more than 40 events for the late-April celebration, a process that began as early as 2010, school officials say. Murphy and Opperman had warned students in an April 12 Daily Sun op-ed that additional, disruptive demonstrations could be considered violations of the school's code of conduct, and would have consequences.

"What Mary and I were trying to do was make it very clear about what's appropriate student activism, if you will -- what's a level of disruption that we might tolerate," Murphy told HuffPost. She said the activists' behavior during the earlier demonstrations, and their activity on Facebook, made it clear that their goals were "not for dialogue, but intentionally for disruption."

The administrators wanted to convey that "our tolerance that occurred for the disruption previously was probably not going to be there," Murphy said. No one had been arrested or charged for the demonstration outside the March 26 trustees meeting, where students chanted "Costs rise, so do we" and "Raise hell, not tuition," according to the Daily Sun.

"They were not just chanting outside the room," said Murphy. Rather, she alleged, the activists were banging on the room's walls and doors as well.

"I happen to have been the person who was trying to make a presentation inside, so I can testify to how disruptive it was," she said.

On Saturday, student activists received a note from Facebook saying that law enforcement had subpoenaed information about their account. CUPD is seeking names of administrators and IP addresses for everyone in the "Save the Pass" Facebook group, which has been posting many of the notes about planned demonstrations. Zoner would not specify what officials are looking for on Facebook, saying only that they are investigating who may have been involved in a crime.

Students have also demanded a tuition freeze, in addition to repealing the health fee. In an April 24 email to the activists, Murphy wrote that she "doubt[ed] such a dramatic step could occur."Like Us On Facebook |

Follow Us On Twitter |

Contact The Author-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 21 hours ago.

ACA Tax Filing Was Surprisingly Painless, But Not For All

$
0
0
It turns out that the first year of tax filing for people who have Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies was a lot easier than the first year of enrolling in the online exchanges. In contrast to the ACA’s maiden open enrollment season, the initial process of settling up incorrect subsidies [...] Reported by Forbes.com 18 hours ago.

What, No Corvette?! Teaching Kids About Money and Saving Should Start Early

$
0
0
Like many 14-year-old boys, my son loves sports cars and is always researching the latest models, engine sizes and top speeds. So I wasn't surprised when, on the way to a soccer game recently, he said, "Hey, Dad! Take a look at that cool Corvette!" Shiny, sleek, cherry red and zipping past us -- I had to admit, it was eye-catching. But what he said next took me aback: "C'mon, Dad, you should buy one," he said. "They're only $57,000."To my son, $57,000 seemed like a relative bargain when compared to the Ferraris and Lamborghinis he sees in magazines and online, with prices approaching $400,000 to $500,000. Thanks to the Internet, music lyrics and the chatter loop in school, kids today seem to know the price of everything. Walk down the street and they're running the numbers -- the $120 brand-name sneakers, the $200 jacket, the $38 shirt, even when bought on sale. They can't afford these things, but they have the information at their fingertips. They even know the value and price of their house -- and of all the houses in the neighborhood.However, for many kids -- my son included -- understanding what it takes to pay for these items is another thing entirely.Seizing the opportunity for a teachable moment, I asked my son: "Do you know what the typical household income is in this country?"Shrug. "Not really.""Just about $50,000."[1] Through the rear-view mirror, I see the gears turning in his head. This was one number he didn't know."Well you could borrow the money!" he exclaimed."Now, it might be possible to get a loan so you wouldn't have to pay the full price right away if, as a grown-up, you were truly in the market for a car like that. But you've got your rent to pay, any idea what that might cost?"Another bewildered look. "Probably about $1,000 a month, depending on where you live, so that's $12,000 a year." I continued, "Of course, you'll have a few other things to buy, like food and health insurance. All that will take a lot of your paycheck. And don't forget about taxes -- they'll probably take most of the rest. And then there's retirement and the cost of college, if you have kids. You need to save money for those things. So, I don't see a lot of money in there for a Corvette. Besides, a Corvette only has two seats. If Mom and I were sitting in the front seat, where would you sit?"Admittedly, I was laying it on to make a point, but I thought it was important for him to know that the price isn't the full measure of any purchase. And I wanted to remind him how expenses and savings should take priority over buying a flashy car of any make or model.This discussion got me thinking. When I was about my son's age, I measured costs in the number of weeks it would take me to earn that much money on my paper route. I never thought of buying a car, but I did covet a bike, a new one that was bigger and spiffier than the unremarkable two-wheeler I was riding. I had lingered in the local bike shop and learned there were basically three types of bikes -- the decent one, the good one, and the really good one. I decided on the good one for $145.My parents agreed to kick in half as a birthday present, but I had to come up with the rest from my paper route money. I earned about $7 a week, a dollar a day, delivering papers to more than 30 houses in my neighborhood. I'll never forget, after about ten weeks of getting up at 5:30 in the morning and tossing rolled-up newspapers onto front steps, how I counted out the crumpled tens, fives and singles on the kitchen table until I reached $72.50. Decades later, the price of that bike is firmly etched in my mind because I know exactly how hard I had to work to earn the money to pay for it.This is the true price, and kids rarely have a sense of that. To be sure, as a kid, I didn't have to think about a mortgage or rent payment, paying for my own meals or paying to see my pediatrician, so I could tuck my cash into the stash and buy that one cool thing. But paying for that bike helped me learn about earning and saving in a way I remember to this day. Giving kids an opportunity to learn these lessons is even more important these days. Sure, it takes time, patience and a lot of conversations, but -- much like savings -- the lessons add up over years.It's important to start when they are young: A child as young as three can start to get a sense of how much things cost. When a daughter goes with her father to the grocery store, for example, he can point out simple prices, like a dollar for a can of soup, another dollar for two apples, and a third dollar for some bread, and then ask her: "How much does that add up to for dinner?" Suddenly, food doesn't just appear; it's paid for. And parents can reinforce the idea of saving money by giving a child a piggy bank or a savings jar to be filled by a small allowance of a few coins each week, so she can watch the little pile of money grow.A few years later, starting when a child is seven, parents might go further to having three savings jars: One for the occasional splurge (like my bicycle), one for expenses and one for charity. I think of this as the "bucketing" strategy. It's a good way to make clear that charity isn't just for left-over money, but it is a basic element of any budget. By separating out those major purchases, parents make clear that some things will have to wait until a child has the money for them.In another few years, at age 11 say, a parent might add a savings account to the mix, giving a child a place to deposit cash from odd jobs or a birthday check from a grandparent. That's a great time to talk more about the value of savings -- that saving means keeping. And it's not too soon to start introducing the concept of a budget, to demonstrate that money is finite and everyone has to make choices. For the average family, a mom might point out that she has $350 to get through the week, and if the groceries run $100, how much does that leave for everything else? She might even mention this to her son when they're out shopping. "I can't afford that this week," she might say. "So I'll have to wait until next." That way the child learns about waiting, always a good lesson in personal finance.By 14, a teen might be ready for a lesson in investing, perhaps by hearing from Mom or Dad about an investment decision they might have made recently, and why they made it. A parent might have made a shrewd move to get into the stock market after a slump, when solid companies seemed undervalued. Then everyone in the family can track those stocks, possibly with the awareness that those investments represent a good portion of money earmarked to send the children to college. Or teenagers might begin to invest small sums in stocks of their own, and explain why they picked them -- not just because they were brand names kids know and like, but because the company had good growth prospects.It's certainly not unrealistic to expect children to start to take on small jobs, the equivalent of my paper route, to get a more immediate sense of the value of money. But the budget lessons are never done, and it's important for parents to keep making distinctions among major purchases, continuing expenses, savings, investments and gifts to charity -- all while operating within the parameters of what they have to spend. Parents should be open with their kids about the financial choices they make, in order to better encourage their children to make wise choices, too.As kids get closer to 18, it's important for parents to start talking to them about "the burn-to-earn" ratio. What that means: It doesn't matter how much you make, as long as you save something off the top for retirement and college, and then live on what's left. And the numbers will change. We can expect that our cost of living will go up, and we hope that as we gain skills, responsibility and education, our wages will increase, too. So it's important to save more over time and to avoid the temptation to increase your lifestyle with your paycheck. In fact, kids in their late teens aren't too young to hear about the importance of enrolling in an employer's 401(k) savings plan as soon as they get a job.The world of money isn't complicated if young adults are prepared for it. Just as schools gradually bring kids along in math and history and all the other subjects, parents can slowly introduce their kids to money and saving, with each stage of their understanding leading to another, until these children emerge as young adults who understand the cost of living -- and know that a Corvette, for most people, is best admired from a more practical set of wheels.*About the author:* John Sweeney is executive vice president, Retirement and Investing Strategies for Personal Investing, a unit of Fidelity Investments, in Boston. Follow him on Twitter @SweeneyFidelity.
[1] Median household income was $51,939 in 2013, Income and Poverty in the United States: 2013 Current Population Reports Issued September 2014 P60-249 By Carmen DeNavas-Walt and Bernadette D. Proctor, Issued September 2014
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 18 hours ago.

Pacific Prime Singapore Release Guide On Private Versus Public Health Care in Singapore

$
0
0
Pacific Prime explore the differences between the two systems in a guide titled Private, public, international health care in Singapore

SINGAPORE (PRWEB) April 30, 2015

People new to Singapore will no doubt have a number of questions regarding the city. In an attempt to familiarise themselves with their new locale, expatriates will, no doubt, seek out advice from co-workers and neighbors, as well as from online resources. For those that are looking to better understand the landscape of Singapore’s healthcare and medical system, they now have a valuable resource to turn to from Pacific Prime.

Pacific Prime has just released a guide on ‘Public and Private Healthcare in Singapore’. This guide was designed to give a basic introduction of Singapore’s healthcare system, with special focus applied to topics that would be most relevant to new expats to the city. Topics covered within include:·     Universal Healthcare
·     Public Hospitals
·     Private Hospitals
·     Cost
·     Insurance
·     Alternative Healthcare

If you are looking for any of the information mentioned above, go to Pacific Prime Singapore’s website today and check out the guide for yourself. It is available in an easy-to-read PDF that can even be shared with friends.

Additionally, since many expats in Singapore are not eligible to receive government subsidised healthcare, interested parties can also benefit from using Pacific Prime Singapore’s online quotation tool. With the tool, users can compare plans across a number of the world’s best insurance companies to find plans with benefits custom tailored to each client’s specific needs.

About Pacific Prime: For more than 15 years Pacific Prime has been offering expatriates and high net worth individuals in countries throughout the Asia Pacific and Middle Eastern regions with high quality international health insurance plans. Pacific Prime’s focus is on providing excellent customer service, and their knowledgeable agents are dedicated to providing plans that work best for customers, not the insurance companies. Contact them today for your free quote. Reported by PRWeb 18 hours ago.

National Briefing | South: Louisiana: Lawmakers Refuse to Add More Working Poor to Medicaid

$
0
0
State lawmakers rejected efforts to expand the state Medicaid program to give the working poor government-funded health insurance, the third year of defeats for the legislation. Reported by NYTimes.com 17 hours ago.

Women’s Group: Insurers Aren’t Providing Birth Control, Health Care Per Obamacare

$
0
0
Women’s Group: Insurers Aren’t Providing Birth Control, Health Care Per Obamacare Women’s Group: Insurers Aren’t Providing Birth Control, Health Care Per Obamacare
Women’s Group: Insurers Aren’t Providing Birth Control, Health Care Per Obamacare
Health
Politics
Obamacare
Has Been Optimized

The National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), an advocacy group, released two reports today that claim many health insurance companies are violating Obamacare rules on contraception and other types of medical care for women.

According to the NWLC, the women's coverage report detailed "violations related to maternity care, birth control, breast-feeding support and supplies, genetic testing, well-woman visits, prescription drug coverage, care related to gender transition for transgender individuals, chronic pain treatment, and certain pre-existing conditions."

The women's coverage report analyzed plans by more than 100 health insurance plans in 15 states, and "found that more than half of the issuers were violating" Obamacare rules.

The birth control coverage report delved deeper into contraception and found that some health insurance companies do not cover an intrauterine device (IUD), vaginal ring and the patch, notes The Hill.

The NWLC noted that insurers "not only fail to comply with the [Affordable Care Act], but recreate the cost barriers that existed prior to the ACA that contribute to increased risk of unintended pregnancy."

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services spokeswoman Katie Hill said in an email to The Hill, "We will continue to provide guidance to help ensure that women have access to recommended preventive benefits and will explore whether additional measures are necessary."

Karen Ignagni, CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, a lobbying group for health insurance companies, fired back in a statement: "To use highly selective anecdotes to draw sweeping conclusions about consumers’ coverage does nothing to improve the quality, accessibility, or affordability of health care for individuals and families."

However, the Kaiser Family Foundation also found a lack of contraception coverage in a study of five states.

Sources: The Hill, National Women’s Law Center, Kaiser Family Foundation
Image Credit: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse

1
Comments: 
Likes: 
Shares: 
Combined FB: 
Video Piece: 
Regular Piece
OV in Depth:  Reported by Opposing Views 15 hours ago.

Hospital Linen Supply & Management Services Procurement Category Market Research Report from IBISWorld Has Been Updated

$
0
0
The launch of the ACA, along with strong growth in federal funding for Medicare and Medicaid, has supported moderate price growth during the past three years; prices will continue to accelerate as the number of Americans with private health insurance continues to climb, and hospitals and related healthcare facilities outsource linen services to keep pace with rising demand. For these reasons and to help procurement professionals make better buying decisions faster, business intelligence firm IBISWorld has updated a report on the procurement of Hospital Linen Supply & Management Services in its growing collection of procurement category market research reports

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) April 30, 2015

The hospital linen supply and management services market has a buyer power score of 3.3 out of 5, indicating slightly favorable negotiation conditions for buyers. According to IBISWorld analyst Kiera Outlaw, buyer power has been hindered somewhat due to rising market share concentration. Although still low, concentration has been rising as larger vendors have been increasingly acquiring smaller players to garner a greater share of the market. Fortunately for buyers, this market's top four players account for less than 30.0% of total market revenue, meaning that buyers still have the ability to leverage multiple bids to find the most competitive pricing. High price driver volatility has weighed against buyer power as well. However, when combined with low market share concentration, suppliers have been encouraged to keep service prices low and stable to attract customers.

Buyer power has been somewhat supported due to the moderate availability of substitutes. Although linen laundering is an unavoidable necessity for buyers, buyers do have access to a few viable alternatives such as an on-premise laundry, on-site management or using disposable linens. The costs associated with each option vary and can be considerable, but buyers can use these options as leverage during the negotiation process, says Outlaw. Buyers can also leverage this market's low degree of specialization because it indicates that the majority of suppliers provide quality linen services as well as additional services, such as usage statistics. These additional services allow buyers to better manage their linen costs.

Fortunately for buyers, the medium range of prices for linen services indicates that buyers have a number of options at their disposal. Depending upon the complexity of their required management system (e.g. rented linens or customer-owned goods), buyers can often negotiate lower prices based on their expected volume of linen usage. Furthermore, prices have been stable during the period, which has allowed buyers to procure linen management services without the risk of sudden price increases. For more information, visit IBISWorld’s Hospital Linen Supply & Management Services procurement category market research report page.

Follow IBISWorld on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IBISWorld
Like IBISWorld on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/IBISWorld/121347533189

IBISWorld Procurement Report Key Topics

This report is intended to assist buyers of hospital linen supply and management services. Hospital linens include mattress pads, stretcher sheets, barrier drapes, antimicrobial pillows, bed sheets, bedspreads, blankets, pillows and protective pillowcases. Linen management services encompass all aspects of linen processing, including linen rental programs, laundering services and in-house distribution. This report excludes other hospital and medical apparel, textiles and services, such as patient or medical staff clothing, surgical textiles, medical gloves and other accessories, as well as supply and management services pertaining to these products.

Executive Summary
Pricing Environment
Price Fundamentals
Benchmark Price
Pricing Model
Price Drivers
Recent Price Trend
Price Forecast
Product Characteristics
Product Life Cycle
Total Cost of Ownership
Product Specialization
Substitute Goods
Regulation
Quality Control
Supply Chain & Vendors
Supply Chain Dynamics
Supply Chain Risk
Imports
Competitive Environment
Market Share Concentration
Market Profitability
Switching Costs
Purchasing Process
Buying Basics
Buying Lead Time
Selection Process
Key RFP Elements
Negotiation Questions
Buyer Power Factors
Key Statistics

About IBISWorld Inc.
IBISWorld is one of the world's leading publishers of business intelligence, specializing in Industry research and Procurement research. Since 1971, IBISWorld has provided thoroughly researched, accurate and current business information. With an extensive online portfolio, valued for its depth and scope, IBISWorld’s procurement research reports equip clients with the insight necessary to make better purchasing decisions, faster. Headquartered in Los Angeles, IBISWorld Procurement serves a range of business, professional service and government organizations through more than 10 locations worldwide. For more information, visit http://www.ibisworld.com or call 1-800-330-3772. Reported by PRWeb 12 hours ago.

GOP divided as Supreme Court ruling on health care law nears

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — Congressional Republicans are divided over how to respond to an approaching Supreme Court decision on President Barack Obama's health care law, even as growing numbers concede that their long-sought goal of repealing the statute will have to wait. Republicans broadly agree that Congress should react by temporarily replacing that aid, aware that abruptly ending it would anger millions of voters before the 2016 presidential and congressional elections. [...] the sheer existence of the GOP proposals could help in court because it might suggest to the justices that despite Democrats' claims that eliminating the subsidies would spark health insurance chaos, Congress is already working on ways to avoid that. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., is helping to craft a plan he says would temporarily protect people who lose subsidies and eliminate the law's requirements that individuals buy coverage and that companies cover their workers. Republicans will be able to use special budget rules this year shielding legislation addressing the health law from Senate filibusters, which take 60 votes — a difficult hurdle — to end. Plaintiffs say the Obama administration is unlawfully providing subsidies to people buying health coverage in the 37 states using healthcare.gov, the federally run insurance marketplace. Reported by SeattlePI.com 12 hours ago.

Connected devices and your privacy

$
0
0
*Connected devices and your privacy*

*What it does.* Modern multitasking parents can check in on their infants via smartphone using fully networked, motion-sensing, HD video-streaming systems with built-in speakers that let them talk to their baby while loading up the washing machine.

That type of right-there access is comforting for a parent, but it’s positively sickening if a hacker is also tuning in. The threat isn’t theoretical. In January, it was reported that a nanny in Houston heard an unfamiliar voice coming from a two-way baby monitor made by Foscam. According to reports, the voice said, “That’s a really poopy diaper,” then warned her to password-protect the camera.

In 2013 and 2014, the British press reported that sadistic hackers took over monitors to scream at sleeping children, and last fall officials in the U.K. warned that live feeds from baby monitors and home security cameras around the world were accessible to the public on the Internet. When Consumer Reports checked recently, we found a site that was still hosting security-camera feeds, including some that appeared to be from people’s homes.

*What you need to know.* An unprotected camera is worse than no camera at all. Internet-­connected baby monitors and home security cameras use your home Wi-Fi network, and certain models can communicate directly with a phone using Bluetooth when you’re home. Parents need strong passwords on their home network and on the baby monitor itself to keep the feeds secure.

*Read our special report, "In the Privacy of Your Own Home," and use these privacy tips for the Internet of Things.*

*What it does.* Blood glucose test results help diabetics manage and treat their condition. Connected meters, such as the OneTouch Verio Sync, send test results to a smartphone app and can even pass the data along to your doctor. The meter can store hundreds of results gathered over time.

*What you need to know.* When you use one of these devices at a hospital or doctor’s office, the medical information it produces is protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the law governing the privacy of medical records. But HIPAA doesn’t protect your data when you use the devices on your own outside a medical setting. That leaves the burden on consumers to learn how their data is being protected and how it is shared. OneTouch says it encrypts personally identifiable data and health data it transmits from the device. But not all health apps do. In a 2013 Privacy Rights Clearinghouse report analyzing 43 health and fitness apps, researchers found that very few encrypted their data.

*Use our guide to digital security to stay safe online.*

*What it does.* Connected thermostats are like ordinary programmable thermostats on steroids. They may sense when people are home, learn a family’s preferred temperature settings, and allow users to make adjustments remotely using a smartphone. Features vary: The Honey­well Lyric employs geofencing—it tracks whether homeowners’ phones are nearby—and the Nest programs itself by observing when users are home or away. Nest, which is owned by Google, is courting connected-­home partners including LG refrigerators, lock companies, and Dropcam security cameras (also owned by Google).

*What you need to know.* In order to work, some smart thermostats need to track when you are home. If that unnerves you, you’re not going to want one of those products.

*What it does.* Ah, the elixir of wakefulness! Anything that makes coffee faster and easier is welcome in many households. The Mr. Coffee Smart Optimal Brew Wi-Fi-connected coffeemaker is one of several appliances that works on Belkin’s WeMo platform. It can tell you when your coffee is ready, remind you to set up the machine in the evening, and let you change the brewing delay remotely.

*What you need to know.* When you interface with your coffee machine via an app, your brewing habits can become the property of the coffeemaker company and the app developer. It may not seem like the most compromising information, but it’s a pretty good indicator of when you’re home, when you wake up, and just how on edge you might be. Plus, in our experience with Mr. Coffee’s Wi-Fi model, if you turn off the network connection, you won’t be able to program the machine.

*What it does.* In a fitness-obssessed society like ours, it’s tempting to want to calculate every move you make. Activity trackers can record the miles you’ve walked, how far you’ve swum, how well you slept, and how quickly your heart has been beating. Some will map out your run using GPS capabilities.

*What you need to know.* Data transmitted from a tracker to its smartphone app may be sent unencrypted. The information includes the user’s name, address, password, and, potentially, GPS data. A burglar—or stalker—armed with that data could surmise that you go out for a run through a nearby park every day at 6 a.m. Activity trackers are used in many corporate wellness programs; some advocates and researchers worry that such initiatives could lead to intrusive monitoring of employee habits in the future.

*What it does.* Want to let the plumber in while you’re away? Leaving a key under the mat is the classic workaround—and it’s a bad one. New connected locks allow the user to provide one-time, short-term, or scheduled access to a home. Certain locks even allow the user to unlock the door remotely through a home Wi-Fi network. Connected locks work with the user’s own smartphone—so you have fewer items to carry, fumble with, and potentially misplace.

*What you need to know.* Security researchers have successfully hacked into connected household locks. Certain locks can be linked with home-automation ecosystems, such as Works with Nest and Apple’s upcoming HomeKit. The downside to connected-home ecosystems is that they consolidate a lot of your home’s data on a single corporation’s servers. But those companies are requiring partners to include security and privacy protections.

This article also appeared in the June 2015 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

*Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.*

*Subscribe now!*
Subscribe to *ConsumerReports.org* for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
--------------------
Update your feed preferences
   
   
   
   
    Reported by Consumer Reports 7 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images