Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Someone Calculated How Many Adjunct Professors Are On Public Assistance, And The Number Is Startling

$
0
0
Once in a while, someone publishes an article about adjunct professors who resort to food stamps in order to survive on the rock-bottom pay that so many college instructors are expected to live on. But until today, I had never seen a statistic summing up how many academics are actually resorting to government aid. The number, it turns out, is rather large. According to an analysis of census data by the University of California–Berkeley's Center for Labor Research and Education, 25 percent of "part-time college faculty" and their families now receive some sort public assistance, such as Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program, food stamps, cash welfare, or the Earned Income Tax Credit. For what it's worth, that's not quite so bad as the situation faced by fast-food employees and home health care aids, roughly half of whom get government help. But, in case there were any doubt, an awful lot of Ph.D.s and master's degree holders are basically working poor.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 14 hours ago.

Leaders Push Medicare Bill Toward Final Congressional Approval

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — Legislation permanently overhauling how Medicare pays physicians won approval Tuesday from an atypically united Congress as lawmakers banded together to erase an irritant that has dogged them for years.

Adding urgency to legislators' work, the measure headed off a 21 percent cut in doctors' Medicare fees that would have hit home Wednesday, when the government planned to begin processing physicians' claims reflecting that reduction. The bill also provides billions of extra dollars for health care programs for children and low-income families, including additional money for community health centers.

Working into the evening, the Senate approved the measure 92-8 less than three weeks after the House passed it by a lopsided 392-37. With Republicans controlling the Senate since January, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has been eager to demonstrate his party's ability to conduct Congress' business efficiently.

Conservatives were unhappy that two-thirds of the bill's $214 billion, 10-year costs were financed by simply making federal deficits even bigger, while liberals wanted added money for children and women's programs. But McConnell defended the measure.

"It's another reminder of a new Republican Congress that's back to work," he said after the vote. "And while no bill will ever be perfect, this legislation is a sensible compromise with wide bipartisan support."

Top Democrats also expressed support for the legislation.

"Tonight is a milestone for the Medicare program, a lifeline for millions of people," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

President Barack Obama has promised to sign the bill, which marks a tandem effort by Democrats and Republicans at a time when the two parties are far likelier to block each other's initiatives.

All eight "no" votes came from Republicans, including some of their most conservative members. Among presidential hopefuls, Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Marco Rubio, R-Fla., voted against the bill, while Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted for it.

The bill's chief feature was its annulling of a 1997 law aimed at slowing the growth of Medicare that has repeatedly threatened deep cuts in reimbursements to physicians and led to threats by doctors to stop treating the program's beneficiaries. Congress has blocked 17 reductions since 2003, an exercise that invites intense lobbying and difficult choices about finding budget savings that both parties detested.

Instead, the measure would create a new payment system with financial incentives for physicians to bill Medicare patients for their overall care, not individual office visits.

While Democrats touted the legislation's added funds for children and the poor, Republicans were claiming victory in changes the bill makes in Medicare that would have a long-term though modest impact on the huge program's finances.

While $141 billion of the measure's costs over the decade would come from added federal red ink, about $35 billion would come from Medicare beneficiaries, mostly by raising the medical and prescription drug premiums paid by some upper-income recipients starting in 2018. Though the affected beneficiaries already pay higher premiums than lower-earning people, Congress seldom increases costs on seniors, fearing retribution come the next Election Day from older voters.

The bill would raise another $37 billion by cutting Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and other providers.

Before passage, senators rejected six amendments, three from each party, that were all but sure to lose but let lawmakers demonstrate their disapproval of provisions they opposed.

A Democratic proposal to extend the two years of extra money the measure provided for the popular Children's Health Insurance Program to four years lost on a 50-50 vote — short of the 60 votes needed to prevail. By 58-42, the chamber rejected an effort by conservatives to force Congress to find enough savings to pay for the entire measure without increasing federal red ink.

"Honestly it's my hope that the amendments are not approved, because we need to get this bill down to the president for signature before midnight," McConnell told reporters.

Senators faced conflicting pressures from lobbying groups.

The American Medical Association and other providers' organizations were urging lawmakers to pass the bill. AARP, the senior citizens' lobby, wanted legislators to back an amendment ending Medicare's annual coverage limits for therapy but stopped short of urging the bill's defeat without that change.

Conservative groups including the Club for Growth and Heritage Action for America pressed lawmakers to support the GOP amendment — which lost — to require Congress to pay for the entire bill.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who crafted the compromise with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., warned senators of the impending doctors' cuts and underscored the futility of trying to amend the bill.

"The House legislation passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, and we do not plan to act again, so we urge the Senate to approve the House-passed bill without delay," Boehner said in a written statement.

The 21 percent cut in doctors' fees technically took effect April 1. Citing federal law, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stopped processing those claims two weeks ago — in effect giving lawmakers time to complete the legislation. The agency processes around 4 million Medicare payments for doctors daily.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

Average Fine For Noncompliance With ObamaCare Is $1130, Expert Testifies

$
0
0
As millions of Americans scramble to file their tax returns, many are shocked by the full cost of ObamaCare’s individual mandate. “Those who failed to obtain minimum essential health insurance coverage last year will have had to send the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) a check for $1,130, on average,” Doug Holtz-Eakin, [...] Reported by Forbes.com 13 hours ago.

More Than Half Of Welfare Spending Goes To Working Families

$
0
0
More Than Half Of Welfare Spending Goes To Working Families We’ve talked quite a bit over the past several months about wage growth or, more appropriately, a lack thereof. *The problem in the US is that for the 80% of workers the BLS classifies as “non-supervisory” (i.e. Hillary Clinton’s “everyday Americans”), higher pay is proving to be a rather elusive concept. *The same cannot be said for America’s bosses however, who have seen their wages grow at a healthy pace. We’ve also argued that this doesn’t bode well for the US economic “recovery” (which we’ve only been waiting on for six years) because *when three quarters of workers are suffering under stagnant wages and when the engine that drives three quarters of economic output (consumer spending) is almost perfectly correlated (0.93) with wage growth, you have a recipe for lackluster GDP prints* and if the Atlanta Fed’s nowcast is any indication, that’s just what we can expect going forward. 

Another consequence of forcing America’s workforce to subsist on low paying jobs with little hope of pay hikes is that it puts extra pressure on the welfare state because if you can’t make ends meet on what you make you can either make more (which, as it turns out, is easier said than done) or turn to the government for assistance. According to a new report from UC Berkeley,* nearly 75% of those receiving some form of public assistance come from working families, confirming that when it comes to straining the public purse, bad jobs may be a bigger problem than no jobs.* 

From UC Berkeley:



*Even as the economy has at last begun to expand at a more rapid pace, growth in wages and benefits for most American workers has continued its decades-long stagnation. Real hourly wages of the median American worker were just 5 percent higher in 2013 than they were in 1979, while the wages of the bottom decile of earners were 5 percent lower in 2013 than in 1979. *Trends since the early 2000s are even more pronounced. Inflation-adjusted wage growth from 2003 to 2013 was either flat or negative for the entire bottom 70 percent of the wage distribution. Compounding the problem of stagnating wages is the decline in employer provided health insurance, with the share of non-elderly Americans receiving insurance from an employer falling from 67 percent in 2003 to 58.4 percent in 2013.

 

Stagnating wages and decreased benefits are a problem not only for low-wage workers who increasingly cannot make ends meet, but also for the federal government as well as the 50 state governments that finance the public assistance programs many of these workers and their families turn to. *Nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of enrollees in America’s major public support programs are members of working families; the taxpayers bear a significant portion of the hidden costs of low-wage work in America…*

 

Overall, between 2009 and 2011 the federal government spent $226.8 billion (in 2013 dollars) annually on these programs, with 56 percent—that is, $127.8 billion—going to working families.

 

*More than half (55 percent) of the federal Medicaid/ CHIP annual expenditures—$45.4 billion— went to workers and their dependents. *Around one-quarter of federal TANF funds ($1.6 billion annually) were used to assist working families. Fully four-fifths (81 percent) of yearly EITC costs went to working families. The SNAP program cost $26.7 billion for working families, which is 38 percent of total federal expenditures on this program.

 

Overall, states collectively spent $25 billion annually between 2009 and 2011 to fund public assistance health programs and provide cash assistance to working families (see Table 3, page 4). This represented over half (52 percent) of total state-level funding for the two programs.

 

Per year the states collectively spent $43.9 billion on the health programs Medicaid and CHIP. Out of this,* $23.8 billion—54 percent—was used to fund these health programs for members of working families.* Looking at TANF, $1.2 billion (27 percent) of the $4.6 billion cash assistance provided by the states went to working families.

 

*When jobs don’t pay enough, workers turn to public assistance in order to meet their basic needs*. These programs provide vital support to millions of working families whose employers pay less than a liveable wage. At both the state and federal levels, more than half of total spending on the public assistance programs analyzed in this report—Medicaid/CHIP, TANF, EITC, and food stamps—goes to working families.

 

Higher wages and increases in employer-provided health insurance would result in significant Medicaid savings that states and the federal government could apply to other programs and priorities.

 



The irony here seems to be that because companies would rather spend their money on raises for "supervisors" and on stock buybacks which benefit the very same supervisory employees who are likey to own stocks (and which artificially inflate the bottom line), everyday taxpayers just like the ones who can't get a raise end up footing the bill via public assistance programs. The companies meanwhile, get to utilize nice little tricks like corporate tax inversions in order to avoid paying their share of the assistance handed out to the very same employees they underpay.  Reported by Zero Hedge 13 hours ago.

Leaders push Medicare bill toward final congressional OK

$
0
0
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate leaders drove legislation permanently overhauling how Medicare pays physicians toward final congressional approval Tuesday in a rare bipartisan push to erase an irritant that has dogged lawmakers for years. A Democratic proposal to extend the two years of extra money the measure provided for the popular Children's Health Insurance Program to four years lost on a 50-50 vote — short of the 60 votes needed to prevail. "The House legislation passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, and we do not plan to act again, so we urge the Senate to approve the House-passed bill without delay," Boehner said in a written statement. Citing federal law, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stopped processing those claims two weeks ago — in effect giving lawmakers time to complete the legislation. Reported by SeattlePI.com 12 hours ago.

Hours from deadline, bipartisan Medicare bill heads to White House

$
0
0
America's doctors can rest easy: Not only has Congress ensured they will be paid in full for the services they render to Medicare patients, it has ended the yearly ritual putting that in doubt.The Senate voted 92-8 to approve a long-term "doc fix," as the legislation adjusting Medicare fees has long been known, less than three hours before federal officials would have reduced payments to health-care providers by 21 percent. President Obama has indicated that he will sign the bill, which also extends the federal Children's Health Insurance Program, a key Democratic priority. Reported by Washington Post 11 hours ago.

CSG Government Solutions’ Mark Elliott Reappointed as National Council for Prescription Drug Programs Standardization Co-Chair

$
0
0
CSG Government Solutions, a national leader in government program modernization, today announced that Mark Elliott has been reappointed by the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP) as a Standardization Co-Chair for the third consecutive year.

Chicago, Illinois (PRWEB) April 15, 2015

CSG Government Solutions, a national leader in government program modernization, today announced that Mark Elliott has been reappointed by the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP) as a Standardization Co-Chair for the third consecutive year.

Mr. Elliott is a Principal in CSG’s Healthcare and Human Services practice and has been an NCPDP member since 1999. He has over 25 years of public sector health information technology experience, providing state agencies with industry standard, regulation, and process guidance related to pharmacy benefits management, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Medicaid, and Medicare. In addition, Mr. Elliott is a candidate for this year’s NCPDP Benjamin D. Ward Distinguished Member Award, the second time he has received this honor.

“As a longtime member of NCPDP and active participant in several NCPDP Committees and Task Groups, we are proud that Mark is able to continue this service to such an established organization,” says Andrea Danes, Director of CSG’s Healthcare and Human Services practice. “He is dedicated to their consensus-building process and will serve the organization well as they continue to advance their mission of providing enhanced healthcare system quality and efficiency through the creation and promotion of information technology solutions.”

CSG Government Solutions continues to increase its presence across the United States. The company deploys highly experienced teams and innovative methods, knowledge, and tools to help governments modernize complex program enterprises. CSG clients include 40 state governments, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Labor, and large municipal governments.

CONTACT:
Andrea Danes
Director, Healthcare and Human Services Practice
CSG Government Solutions
180 N. Stetson Ave.
Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60601
312.444.2760 Fax: 312.938.2191
adanes@csgdelivers.com

ABOUT CSG GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS:
CSG Government Solutions is a leading government operations consulting firm focused on helping states modernize critical program enterprises. Our highly experienced teams and industry-leading Centers of Excellence help governments leverage innovative technology and processes to meet the challenges of administering complex programs. Founded in 1997, CSG has established itself as a trusted adviser to government agencies across the U.S. Reported by PRWeb 4 hours ago.

Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers Launches New Associate Degree Program

$
0
0
Recognizing the demand for its certificate students to continue their education, Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers is now offering an Associate of Applied Science (AAS) Degree in Computer Applications Technology with two Concentration choices: Business or Medical Office Administration.

Miami, FL (PRWEB) April 15, 2015

April 14, 2015 – Recognizing the demand for its certificate students to continue their education, Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers is now offering an Associate of Applied Science (AAS) Degree in Computer Applications Technology with two Concentration choices: Business or Medical Office Administration. The addition of the AAS Degree is in preparation for the 1993 established School’s transition to a degree-granting college.

“We are excited to bring to our student graduates affordable career-focused degrees in which they can apply up to 100% of their previously earned eligible credits toward a degree. Offering our valued students the option of both certificate and degree programs reflects our commitment to invest in customized lifelong learning and improving lives through education,” says Sheila Chapman, Vice President of Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers. We look forward to additional degree offerings in the near future including Human Resources, Information Technology, Legal Studies, Accounting and more.”

Associate of Applied Science Degree, Computer Applications Technology – Medical Office Concentration:
In this program, students will learn skills and education essential to any business or healthcare office including: Office Applications, Medical Office Procedures, Medical Billing and Medical Coding, Medical Law and Ethics, Health Insurance Processing, Anatomy and Physiology, Pharmacology, Electronic Records and Medical Transcription. The degree is awarded to students after earning 60 credits.

Associate of Applied Science Degree, Computer Applications Technology – Business Concentration:
In this program, students will learn fundamental skills essential to any business in the areas of: Office Applications, Accounting, Communications, Psychology, Human Resources, Marketing, Business Law and Ethics as well as Business Management. The degree is awarded to students after earning 60 credits.

Applications are now being accepted for both degree concentrations. The programs are offered completely online in 35 states and in classrooms located in Miami, Florida. Classes begin on a rolling schedule. More details can be found at http://www.sctrain.edu or Toll Free at 1-888-TRAIN-77 (87246).

About Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers:
Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers was established in 1993 for the purpose of improving the quality of life through education. Since 1993, we have trained over 13,000 students and prepared them for meaningful employment in the areas of administrative, accounting and finance, management, medical/healthcare administration and information technology.

There are two campus locations in Miami, Florida and online training is available in thirty five states. Sullivan and Cogliano Training Centers is nationally accredited through the Council on Occupational Education (COE) (http://www.council.org)

                                                                                     ### Reported by PRWeb 4 hours ago.

5 Things to Know About Tax Day: For Most, It's Not That Bad

$
0
0
5 Things to Know About Tax Day: For Most, It's Not That Bad Filed under: Taxes, U.S. Government, Income Tax, Tax Laws

*Shutterstock*

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON -- Wednesday is the deadline for filing income tax returns, a day long associated with the dread of rushing to fill out complicated forms and, perhaps, making a payment to Uncle Sam. But for most, it's not that bad. Aside from the complicated forms, tax season generates $300 billion in tax refunds each year, a significant boost to the U.S. economy. Five things to know about Tax Day:

*1. Majority of Taxpayers Get Refunds*

The Internal Revenue Service has received more than 99 million tax returns as of April 3, and about 78 percent of them have qualified for refunds. Average refund: $2,815. The IRS expects to process 150 million returns by the end of the tax season. So far, more than 90 percent have been filed online.

*2. Chances of Getting Audited Are Slim*

Last year, the IRS conducted the fewest number of tax audits in a decade, and the number could be even lower this year, said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. He blames budget cuts. Congress has cut the agency's budget by $1.2 billion since 2010.

The number of audits dropped even as the number of tax returns went up. As a result, fewer than 1 percent of tax returns were audited last year. But rich people beware: Your chances of getting audited go up as your income rises. Last year, the IRS audited 7.5 percent of returns filed by taxpayers making more than $1 million.

*3. April 15 Isn't Much of a Deadline If You're Owed a Refund*

The IRS doesn't like to talk about it, but penalties for filing late federal tax returns apply only to people who owe money. The penalty is a percentage of what you owe. If you owe nothing, there is no penalty.

But it doesn't make much sense to file late if you are owed a refund. And beware -- if you have unpaid taxes, the late fees add up quickly. The failure-to-file penalty is generally 5 percent of your unpaid tax bill for every month, or part of a month, you are late. It kicks in on April 16. In general, the maximum penalty is 25 percent of your original tax bill.

There also is a penalty for failing to pay your tax bill, separate from the penalty for failing to file at all, but it's much smaller. That's because the IRS wants you to file a return even if you don't have enough money to pay your bill. The failure-to-pay penalty is 0.5 percent of your unpaid taxes for every month, or part of a month, you don't pay.

*4. Health Law Makes Tax Day More Complicated for Some*

This was the first tax season that regular folks grappled with the complicated connections between President Barack Obama's health care law and the tax system. For about three-quarters of taxpayers, all they had to do was check a box on their tax return indicating they had health coverage for all of 2014. For the rest, there was some head-scratching.

This was the first year uninsured people faced fines collected by the IRS. And those who got tax credits to help pay premiums last year had to file a convoluted new form to show they got the right amount.

The Obama administration fumbled when the Department of Health and Human Services sent out tax reporting forms with erroneous information on premiums to hundreds of thousands of people. Officials disclosed the problem and set about correcting the mistakes.

*5. Looking Ahead*

The end of tax filing season doesn't mean everyone can relax. Tax preparation company H&R Block says many people who received tax credits to help pay for health insurance premiums apparently are unaware that they need to file a return. If they don't, they may not be able to renew their tax credits this fall for health coverage in 2016.

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments Reported by DailyFinance 1 day ago.

Federal Contract Workers and the Fight For a Living Wage

$
0
0
Tommy Wells/Flickr

Public employees at a 2013 Good Jobs Nation rally in Washington, D.C.

Today, workers in hundreds of cities across the United States will take to the streets to protest meager minimum wages that are keeping them in poverty. Fight For 15 organizers and activists are speaking out against low wages. McDonald’s, Walmart, and other mega-corporations employ a good number of those workers, but the biggest creator of low-wage jobs in the United States is none other than the federal government through federal contracting.

In 2013, a coalition of labor groups started Good Jobs Nation (GJN) to fight to increase and recover wages for government contract employees. On April 9 of this year, GJN released a report, “The Return of Federal Sweatshops? How America’s Broken Contract Wage Laws Fail Workers,” which details how the federal government creates poverty-wage jobs and how workers on federal contract routinely don’t receive their fair amount of pay. Alongside the report, the organization also filed a complaint to the U.S. Department of Labor on behalf of workers employed by federal contractors who are being compensated well below the legal amount.

GJN alleges that the employees in the complaint have been cheated out of $1,578,700 in unpaid wages and benefits, and that the employers are in violation of the Service Contract Act (SCA). Signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson, the SCA was intended to guarantee that federal contractors had to pay their employees no less than a minimum wage and benefit rate set for their occupation and locality. Currently, more than 44,000 different contracts covered by the SCA receive $92 billion each year in federal dollars.

A quick glance around our nation’s capital shows how endemic the problem is. The entire night-cleaning staff at the Lyndon B. Johnson Building in Washington, D.C., the headquarters for the U.S. Department of Education, is grossly underpaid. Sonia and Anibal Chavez are contract janitors who clean Secretary Arne Duncan’s personal office; they can barely make ends meet. “We rely on public aid and charity to feed our children,” Sonia said on a press call with GJN.

She and her husband are paid $9.50 an hour but, according to the SCA, they should be making $11.38 plus another $4.02 in fringe benefits because they don’t receive health insurance. “Secretary Duncan talks about a race to the top on education, why not a race to the top on wages?” says Sonia. The Chavezes’ predicament is not unusual.

Adom Kezie has been a groundskeeper at the National Zoo for six years, having emigrated from Africa, where he left behind his wife and daughter. “I came to America to give them a better life, but I cannot with my meager earnings,” lamented Kezie.

Like the Chavezes, Kezie makes $9.50. He should be earning $13.07 plus $4.02 for the fringe benefits, because he doesn’t receive any health insurance or other benefits. “Back home everyone believed in the American dream, but when I got here, I learned that dream is out of reach,” said Kezie on a press call.

Despite working at high-profile places, Kezie and the Chavezes were flying under the radar until GJN took up their cause. How many federal contractors at less visible workplaces outside the nation’s capital are also violating the SCA?

Because it’s unlikely that a such a gridlocked Congress will act on this, GJN is urging President Barack Obama to use his executive authority to ensure that workers who are employed by federal contractors receive fair pay. In 2014, the president issued an executive order requiring federal contractors to pay workers at least $10.10 an hour and another that bolsters procedures that review contractors’ compliance of labor laws.

In their report, GJN calls for two major actions. Using his executive pen, Obama should build on this precedent to make sure all federal contractors are playing by the rules and paying a living wage. Strengthening SCA enforcement would be a good start, though Obama could also create a preference in federal contracting for employers that pay their workers at least $15 an hour, offer decent benefits, and respect the right of workers to collectively bargain.

Ignoring the plight of these workers employed by contractors who routinely flout the law effectively keeps millions of workers in poverty. The federal government should be fighting to bring more people into the middle class, not keep them out. Reported by The American Prospect 19 hours ago.

WATCH: Terrified ‘Tea Party Patriot’ realizes he could lose Obamacare if GOP wins in 2016

$
0
0
A conservative video blogger with over a million views on YouTube said this week that he would likely vote for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton because he was terrified that a Republican president would take away his affordable health insurance. James Webb, a 51-year-old YouTube cel... Reported by Raw Story 18 hours ago.

Snapchat's stealthy real estate moves are worrying small business owners in Venice

$
0
0
Snapchat's stealthy real estate moves are worrying small business owners in Venice Two years after turning down a $3 billion offer from Facebook, Snapchat continues to grow at breakneck speed. Its business has been valued at as much as $19 billion, and it's raised a total of $848 million in seven funding rounds. Its 24-year-old cofounder and CEO, Evan Spiegel, is reportedly worth $1.5 billion.

But in an interesting contrast to the majority of today's billion-dollar tech companies, Snapchat makes its home not in the office parks of Silicon Valley, but in the Southern California beach town of Venice. 

Snapchat has some 200 employees at its Venice headquarters. As of this writing, there are more than 40 job openings in the company's Venice office in addition to several in New York.

A company expanding that rapidly needs lots of office space, in addition to infrastructure like parking and housing for employees. 

But Venice, a beachfront community of Los Angeles that's long been a haven for artistic types, is known for its pricey bungalows, dearth of parking, and often crippling traffic.

"The market is escalating. There's not a lot of inventory," Tami Pardee, owner and principal broker at Venice-based Pardee Properties, said to Business Insider. "In terms of office space, there's not room for everyone."

Snapchat's first official office was a bright blue beach house on the Venice boardwalk. A yellow sign with a depiction of Ghostface Chillah, Snapchat's ghost logo, marked the spot. 

But by the end of 2013, they had outgrown the beach house and moved to new offices on nearby Market Street. They leased 6,000 square feet of space at 63 Market Street.

The company quickly outgrew that space, however, and a few months later they signed for an additional 3,940 square feet in the building next door.

 They also leased space at 64 Market Street across the street.

In January, according to the Los Angeles Times, the company also leased 25,000 square feet of space at Thornton Lofts, about a half-mile away from Market Street on Ocean Front Walk. 

It's Snapchat's latest real estate deal, however, that has some local business owners questioning the company's decisions. 

Snapchat is rumored to be in talks to take over more than 40,000 square feet in a 55-unit office complex at the corner of Abbot Kinney and Venice Boulevards, one of the busiest intersections in the neighborhood.

More than 30 smaller businesses already make their home there — including mobile advertising startup Briabe Mobile, drone and robotics company Ctrl.Me, design agency Clever Creative, and several law and insurance offices. 

Most tenants at the complex are on a month-to-month lease.

According to several business owners in that complex, tenants received a note from their landlord that a deal was going to come down soon, and that it would be in their best interest to look for new space. They would know for sure by June 1 and have until the end of the month to move out.

Tenants haven't gotten any updates since receiving the note several months ago, though the Los Angeles Times recently reported that the deal is as good as done. 

"None of us has been given a lot of information," Briabe Mobile CEO James Briggs, whose company leases about 2,600 square feet in the complex, told Business Insider. "Everyone is under the assumption that Snapchat is going to take the whole thing."

Several of the business owners we spoke to said they will have to leave Venice if the deal goes through. According to data from real estate firm CBRE published by the Los Angeles Times, office lease prices in Venice have doubled since 2011, reaching an average of $5.82 per square feet a month. According to the same data, the vacancy rate has halved to 10%.

"We’re looking on the west side of L.A., maybe Marina del Rey. It’s going to be a struggle," Briggs said. "There are not a lot of business complexes like this in Venice, and we’re completely priced out of what’s left. Venice is out of the question now." 

In an effort to avoid the uncertainty completely, Helena Ruffin moved her health insurance company out of the Venice complex in February.

"I really loved the community, but I couldn’t risk it," she told Business Insider. "We were in the process of enrolling a hundred new clients, and I couldn’t risk having to move offices and move my staff and interrupting my business seriously."

Ruffin purchased a two-story townhouse in Playa Vista, just a few miles east of Venice. She lives on the second floor and runs her business on the first, paying roughly the same amount she paid at the Venice office complex. 

"I wanted a little more control over my destiny," she told Business Insider. "I didn’t want to be subject to the whims of a landlord."

Playa Vista has been a place of interest for many larger tech companies looking to increase their footprint in Los Angeles. In December, Google paid $120 million for 12 acres in the city, in addition to its Venice presence. Yahoo plans to move its Los Angeles operation there. Facebook, Microsoft, YouTube, Konami, and Belkin also have large offices there, and there's plenty of room for construction.  

Snapchat, however, has opted to stay in Venice. 

"The expectation was that they would build their own campus in Culver City or Playa Vista, but they consider Venice part of their culture," Levi Brooks, cofounder and CEO of digital creative consultant firm Use All Five, said to Business Insider. Use All Five's office is located in the complex at Venice and Abbot Kinney.

"I understand capitalism and how it works. I’m not mad at Snapchat," Brooks said. "It would've been nice if they had helped us find a new space. Some kind of communication would have gone a long way."

According to Curbed LA, an art studio, youth shelter, and gallery are among the Market Street businesses that have already been pushed out by Snapchat in the past two years.

Some local business owners are concerned that Snapchat's rapid expansion could contribute to a deterioration of Venice's quirky culture. Established in the early 20th century as a planned community, Venice has at different points in its history served as an amusement park, hippie haven, and the birthplace of modern skating culture. 

With lots of hip restaurants and boutiques, it still maintains an edge today; in 2012, GQ named Abbot Kinney "the coolest block in America." 

But Snapchat isn't the only company to push small Venice businesses out of their office space. Locals protested GQ's designation, pointing to rising rents and gentrification as big national brands like Lucky Brand, LF, and Gant moved onto Abbot Kinney. 

"Venice has always been a place that prides itself on diversity," Brooks said. "When you’re buying up all of this space, you lose the diversity of small business."

Of course, not everyone sees Snapchat as having a negative influence on the community. Pardee, who sold a $2.1 million home to Snapchat cofounder Bobby Murphy in 2013, has helped several other employees find homes in the area. 

"They’ve been respectful and very educated about the market as they research so much online," she told Business Insider. "They are excited to be a part of our community."

Plus, she says, having more employees in the area means more people frequenting local boutiques, restaurants, and coffee shops.

"Small businesses and big businesses tend to feed off each other, especially in terms of creativity," Pardee said. "It's a delicate mix, but I don't think Snapchat has been a vulture in Venice. They've been really good tenants."

Jim Murez, manager of the Venice Farmers Market, told the Los Angeles Times that growing tech companies are just a sign of a changing economy. 

"Is having a Snapchat better or worse than a mom-and-pop production company?" Murez said to the LA Times. "It's neither. It's just different."

Snapchat declined to comment on its real estate negotiations. A spokesperson told Business Insider, "We love being in Venice and we strive to be great neighbors within the community where we live and work."

*SEE ALSO: See why more startups than ever are setting up shop on the beach in Los Angeles*

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Every phone needs to have this waterproof technology Reported by Business Insider 18 hours ago.

Mergers and Acquisitions in the Global Life and Health Insurance Industry 2015

$
0
0
DUBLIN, April 15, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/7rhx5h/mergers_and) has announced the addition of the "Mergers and Acquisitions in the Global Life and Health Insurance Industry" report to their offering.     ... Reported by PR Newswire 18 hours ago.

America, It's Been a Privilege

$
0
0
You really can buy anything in America in 2015 -- even things you would never guess in a million years that someone wanted to buy. Who knew, before this weekend, that if you donate enough money, you can even become a quasi-cop and go chasing down criminals and assorted poor people in your spare time?

That's what was going on in Tulsa, where a 73-year-old reserve sheriff's deputy named Robert Bates now faces manslaughter charges for making the mistake of a lifetime -- literally the lost lifetime of his 44-year-old victim, the late Eric Harris. Harris was the target of a sting operation for allegedly illegal firearm sales, although he was unarmed at the time of his attempted arrest. He initially ran from the lawmen who wrestled down and subdued him, only to see Bates shoot Harris to death after thinking his loaded gun was a Taser.

It turned out that Bates had spent only one year as a professional lawman, on the Tulsa city police force way back in 1963 and 1964, when America's new president was Lyndon Johnson. Since then, Bates became a successful insurance agent and, in the words of The New York Times, a "civilian police enthusiast."

His success in business offered Bates special access to the Tulsa County sheriff, Stanley Glanz, who received $2,500 in campaign contributions and made Bates a co-chair of that effort. In recent years, Bates generously donated automobiles and other equipment to the sheriff's department -- and in return was trained and got a badge as a reserve deputy, one of 130 in Tulsa. That roster includes, according to local news reports, scores of wealthy individuals who have the time and the dough to become Weekend Warriors, with a capital "W." Reverse rent-a-cops, if you will.

The thing is that allowing folks to volunteer and direct traffic into the Oklahoma State Fair would be a good idea. Instead, the cash-for-cops crowd went out on gun busts, and now a man facing low-grade criminal charges has been accidentally executed.

Is this an exceptional country or what?

In the last day or two, I've sensed weary resignation to the alarming realities of the Eric Harris killing. The story of the privileged cop-wannabes and their weekend criminal hunts is just a new spin on same exhausting stories we hear on the news every single day, isn't it? There is nothing that the circle of power in the country -- the fabulously wealthy, the politicians and judges that they buy, and the "good guys with guns" who protect their interests -- can't or won't do for each other, no matter how important or how trivial. Conversely, there is never a break for the people who don't have their money or influence or don't look like them.

Privilege and connections have their tentacles in everything, Think of this small detail from last week's arrest of Michael Slager, the cop in North Charleston, South Carolina, who was captured on video shooting the fleeing man Walter Scott in the back multiple times and then planting something near his dying body. As Slager sits in a jail cell, fired from his job and charged with murder, officials said they'd allowed his 8-plus-months-pregnant wife to remain on city health insurance. And she should get the proper medical care -- under a real public health insurance program. Instead, she's getting a break that would never be afforded any other murder suspect, certainly not someone with the wrong friends from the wrong side of town.

But that's how we roll in America. Take a look around to Atlanta, Georgia. There, seven educators were sentenced Tuesday for their role in the scandal of changing kids' standardized test results, under official pressure to raise their scores. Again, it's not a pretty picture that you can wrap up with a pretty bow. Most would agree that what these teachers and principals did was wrong, that they deserve to lose their jos and their credentials and probably worse.

But a vengeful judge sentenced three of the convicted parties to seven years in jail -- more than twice what the state prosecutors had asked for. The judge claimed he wanted accountability, but let's be honest: The real accountable parties were nowhere near the courtroom -- not just ex-Atlanta superintendent Beverly Hall, who died before the trial, and certainly not the politicians and consultants who dreamed up this wretched system of high-stakes testing and probably watched the verdict on the TV over their country club bar.

How many of the Wall Street banksters who swindled billions in mortgage scams or insider deals spent one day -- let alone seven years! -- behind bars. Americans pat themselves on the back for the greatest justice system in the world (spoiler alert: It's not) but only because the idea of the big fish taking the fall isn't even on our moral radar screen anymore.

Think of the news this week that four American contractors from Blackwater were finally convicted and meted out long sentences for a senseless 2007 massacre in Baghdad. A rare case of the system working -- but not completely. Jeremy Scahill, the brilliant journalist behind the film Dirty Wars, noted this week on Twitter, "It's always the lowest level people who go to jail. The Erik Princes [founder of Blackwater], Rumsfelds, Petraeuses, Cheneys never face justice for their crimes."

It's no coincidence that a nation with banana-republic levels of income inequality also has the highest rate of mass incarceration. And it's no wonder the word "privilege" has gone from 0 to 60 in America's political lexicon. If you're a CEO -- even of an Ivy-draped college or a hospital, let alone a profit-seeking corporation -- there's no pay raise, perk or stock-option deal that is too outrageous; if you're a rank-and-file worker, there's no pension surrender or pay giveback that's out of bounds. If you know the right people, there's no appetite for sending you to jail, no matter how horrible a deed you've committed. But if you don't know anybody, there's no prison sentence that is too draconian. There's no tax for the wealthy or for corporations that can't be cut, no backbreaking fee on the poor that can't be instituted.

From coast to coast, a whisper becomes a scream. Where, in the name of God, is the fairness?

Into this maelstrom strides the heir apparent to the Oval Office, Hillary Clinton. She is desperately trying to reassure the voters that, this time, she hears us. "Americans have fought their way back from tough economic times, but the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top," she said Sunday in her announcement video. But you can't blame the public for being both skeptical and cynical.

This is a candidate, after all, whose top four sources of campaign cash when she ran in 2008 included Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase; who's reaped a windfall giving paid speeches to Goldman; and whose daughter Chelsea landed a $600,000-a-year job in TV journalism that was the ultimate wall poster for a nation where who you know trumps what you know.

Maybe this time it's different -- patrician FDR did a lot for the downtrodden in the 1930s, and they say that only Nixon can go to China, but it seems like Hillary Clinton has much, much further than halfway around the world to get where she needs to go on this. No wonder more people aren't waiting for Hillary but taking matters into their own hands, like the folks who were arrested this week in New York for blocking the Brooklyn Bridge. Some nights in America the only effective way to check people's privilege is to block them in traffic.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 17 hours ago.

Large Study of Thyroid Cancer Patients Uncovers Wide Disparities in Survival among Adolescent and Young Adult African Americans and Hispanics, CPIC Researchers Say

$
0
0
Barriers to quality treatment and follow-up care may contribute to poorer outcomes for young thyroid cancer patients of low socioeconomic status

Fremont, California (PRWEB) April 15, 2015

Over the past forty years, thyroid cancer has ranked consistently among the top three cancers affecting adolescents and young adults. Prognosis is generally excellent, but some young thyroid cancer patients are at higher risk of mortality due to place of residence, racial/ethnic background, insurance status, and factors such as age and gender, according to researchers at the Cancer Prevention Institute of California (CPIC).

Men fare worse than women. In fact, adolescent and young adult males with thyroid cancer are two and one-half times more likely to die from their disease than female patients in the same age group.

The disparities were even more striking when the researchers considered racial/ethnic background of the young men and women. African Americans and Hispanics were six times and three times more likely, respectively, to die from thyroid cancer than Whites.

Age made a difference too. Younger patients – those diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 29 -- fared better than those who were over 30 at time of diagnosis. Patients between the ages of 35 and 39 experienced higher mortality, even if their cancer was caught early.

Place of residence also played a role. Adolescent and young adult men residing in low socioeconomic or non-metropolitan areas were more likely to die from their disease. In addition, both young men and women residing in low socioeconomic areas experienced worse survival from other cancers and non-cancer related causes.

“The findings suggest that barriers to obtaining high-quality treatment and follow-up care may contribute to poor outcomes for adolescent and young adult thyroid cancer patients of low socioeconomic status, as well as young men who live in non-metropolitan areas,” said Theresa Keegan, Ph.D., a research scientist at CPIC and lead author of the study. “Such barriers may include lack of health insurance, financial burden of cancer treatment and care, and lengthy travel time to health care facilities.”

“Young men also are less likely to receive routine health care, whereas the adolescent and young adult women may see their physicians more frequently during their reproductive years, regardless of socioeconomic status,” Dr. Keegan noted.

In more recently diagnosed patients who had information on health insurance, those with public insurance or no medical insurance were more likely to die of their disease or other non-cancer causes, the researchers reported. Insurance status has been found to be an important factor influencing stage at diagnosis, treatment and outcome.

“Many young, uninsured patients are not diagnosed until their cancer has already metastasized. They also are less likely to receive adequate treatment,” Dr. Keegan said.

Thyroid cancer patients are at risk for developing several types of subsequent primary cancers, including stomach, colon, breast, kidney and others. While the risk is the same for men and women, adolescent and young adult women were more likely to die from a subsequent cancer. This finding may indicate a predisposition to cancer and should be further explored, the researchers noted.

Thyroid cancer has been on the rise in the population as a whole for the past 30 years, with a particularly dramatic increase in incidence since 2001.

The study, “Socio-demographic disparities in differentiated thyroid cancer survival among adolescents and young adults in California,” has been published in the online edition of the journal Thyroid. In addition to Dr. Keegan, authors include CPIC researchers Li Tao, Ph.D. and Pamela Horn-Ross, Ph.D. (recently retired); Raymon H. Grogan, M.D., Michael G. White, M.D. and Kenan Onel, M.D. of the University of Chicago; and Helen M. Parsons, Ph.D. of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

About the Cancer Prevention Institute of California
The Cancer Prevention Institute of California (CPIC) is the nation’s premier organization dedicated to preventing cancer and to reducing its burden where it cannot yet be prevented. CPIC tracks patterns of cancer throughout the entire population and identifies those at risk for developing cancer. Its research scientists are leaders in investigating the causes of cancer in large populations to advance the development of prevention-focused interventions. CPIC’s innovative cancer prevention research and education programs, together with the work of the Stanford Cancer Institute, deliver a comprehensive arsenal for defeating cancer. For more information, visit http://www.cpic.org.

### Reported by PRWeb 17 hours ago.

39 million reasons why NMHIX decided to remain a state-run hybrid exchange

$
0
0
A cost savings of more than $39 million was a factor in New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange's decision to halt efforts to pursue building an entirely state-run platform for buying health insurance, as decided at the organization's board meeting March 31. "Overall, the costs are lower to continue to implement [the hybrid]. We don’t have specifics from CMS on the lease model, but our preliminary discussions with CMS are very optimistic," said Amy Dowd, CEO of NMHIX. "We know that they are very… Reported by bizjournals 16 hours ago.

Twice the Burden: Low-Wage Employers Cost Taxpayers Billions in Public Assistance and Lost Tax Revenue

$
0
0
On Tax Day, while working Americans contribute their part to keeping the country running, many companies that pay low-wages will exploit a loophole in the tax code that that allowed them to write off taxes on over $66 billion in executive compensation pay between 2007 and 2010.The way the U.S. tax code is written now, performance-based bonuses and stock options for chief executives can be deducted from taxable corporate income. The more performance-based compensation the businesses pay to their executives each year, the less the companies owe in federal taxes.That's why Democrats in Congress are trying a two-pronged approach to increase wages and boost the economy. There is now a bill in the works to raise the federal minimum wage to $12 per hour -- an increase that meets with the approval of an overwhelming number of Americans, including a majority of Republicans.Democrats are also proposing to fix the tax code by ending tax giveaways for companies that don't increase wages for their rank-and-file workers. Instead of rewarding companies for giving millions of dollars in stock options to their CEOs, an updated tax code would encourage companies to pay their workers a livable wage.Companies like McDonald's and Walmart rake in billions in profits each year and return nearly as much to their shareholders. Their employees, however, are paid so little that accepting charity or public assistance becomes vital to making ends meet. As a result, taxpayers subsidize these companies' low-pay practices to the tune of billions of dollars each year in low-income public programs.In fact, low wages in the United States cost taxpayers a stunning $153 billion on average every year. Underpaid workers are forced to rely on public assistance programs like food stamps, Medicaid, the earned income tax credit and Children's Health Insurance Program to support themselves and their households, according to a report this week by the University of California Berkeley Labor Center.That's why thousands of workers are joining together on April 15 to call for $15 an hour and the right to form a union. These workers -- including fast-food, home care, retail, child care, and airport workers and adjunct professors -- are the same people who turn to public assistance to make ends meet. They are striking at a time of record income inequality -- created in part because wages have stagnated for the last 30 years, and also because the tax code has shifted to benefit the wealthiest and burden the rest of us.The day of strikes builds on growing momentum for higher wages nationwide. It is expected to be the largest mobilization by workers seeking higher pay in U.S. history. Launched just two years ago, the "Fight for $15" movement has helped set a new standard for wage increases in both the private and public sector. Recently,Aetna, First Green Bank, C1 Bank and Moo Cluck Moo all announced or began implementing minimum pay rates to levels that can make a difference in the lives of their workers. Cities and localities have also acted to substantially increase minimum wages. Seattle and San Francisco already began phasing in minimum wage rates of $15 earlier this year.Responding to pressure from workers, companies like Walmart, McDonald's, Target, Gap, and others have raised wages -- though not by enough to cut into their workers' reliance on public assistance.The thousands of workers who are striking on Tax Day are right to demand a greater share of the profits that corporations gain because of their labor. It's time to restore that fundamental promise of America that working hard will lead to a better life.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. Reported by Huffington Post 15 hours ago.

MNsure board approves plan to let customers shop at third-party websites

$
0
0
Faced with widespread and public technology problems, MNsure's board is struggling with whether to prioritize fixes to the website where customers can buy private health insurance, or to the software running public health programs such as Medical Assistance. Reported by TwinCities.com 13 hours ago.

Insurers Call for Stronger Rules on Medical Devices

$
0
0
The U.S. health-insurance industry is calling for tougher rules for approving and tracking medical devices, citing regulatory gaps exposed last year when a tool used for decades in hysterectomies was found to spread cancer. Reported by Wall Street Journal 11 hours ago.

Colorado health insurance exchange's overseers beef up scrutiny

$
0
0
The legislative oversight committee for the state health insurance exchange Wednesay advanced its plans to change its name and expand its calendar for reviewing Connect for Health Reported by Denver Post 13 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images