Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Experient Health Discusses Repaying Exchange Subsidy Overpayments in Recent Online Blog Post

$
0
0
In order to help eligible individuals and families purchase health insurance through the Exchange, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created health insurance subsidies in the form of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.

Richmond, Va. (PRWEB) August 30, 2014

In order to help eligible individuals and families purchase health insurance through the Exchange, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created health insurance subsidies in the form of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.

But what exactly are subsidies?

Experient Health, the health insurance arm of the Virginia Farm Bureau, explained it this month in its blog series on health care reform, health insurance and health care issues. The blog was launched last year to keep the community informed of issues and trends that impact their lives.

The ACA created health insurance subsidies, designed to make coverage through an Exchange more affordable by reducing the taxpayer’s out-of-pocket premium costs.

Subsidies became available beginning in 2014, at the same time the Exhanges became operational. The Exchange open enrollment period for the 2014 plan year ended on March 31, 2014. The 2015 annual open enrollment period will be on Nov. 15, 2014.

If an enrollee is eligible for a premium tax credit, advance payments of the credit will be made directly to the insurance company on the family’s behalf. At the end of the year, the advance payments must be reconciled against the amount of the family’s actual premium tax credit, as calculated on the family’s federal income tax return.

"There are two federal health insurance subsidies available with respect to coverage through an Exchange: premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions," Experient Health wrote. "Both of these subsidies vary in amount based on the taxpayer’s household income and reduce the out-of-pocket costs of health insurance for the insured."

Premium tax credits are available for people with somewhat higher incomes (up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL)), and they reduce out-of-pocket premium costs for the taxpayer.

Reduced cost-sharing is available for people with lower incomes (up to 250 percent of the FPL).

"Through cost-sharing reductions, these individuals will be eligible to enroll in plans with higher actuarial values and have the plan, on average, pay a greater share of covered benefits," Experient Health wrote. "This means that coverage for these individuals will have lower out-of-pocket costs at the point of service (for example, lower deductibles and co payments)."

Subsidies are calculated on the taxpayer’s return using the taxpayer’s household income and family size for the taxable year. For purposes of determining eligibility for these subsidies, and the amount of any subsidy available, household income is determined using the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for that year.

"However, because these subsidies are provided when the individual purchases insurance, the Exchanges will generally have to determine household income well before the individual files his or her tax return for that year," according to Experient Health.

So what about Premium Tax Credit Payments?

A refundable tax credit is one that is available to an individual even if he or she has no tax liability. An advanceable tax credit allows an individual to receive assistance at the time that he or she purchases insurance, rather than having to pay the premium out of pocket and wait to be reimbursed when filing his or her annual income tax return.

Advance payments of the premium tax credit will be made directly to the insurance company on the family’s behalf.

"At the end of each year, a taxpayer’s subsidy amount will be recalculated using the taxpayer’s household income as reported on his or her tax return, and any difference in the amounts must be reconciled," Experient Health wrote. "If the taxpayer’s income has increased from the amount that he or she reported to the Exchange, and as a result the taxpayer received a larger subsidy than he or she was entitled to, that individual may have to repay part of his or her subsidy."

For more information, contact Experient Health at (855) 677-6580 or visit the Experient Health subsidy education blog post here. Reported by PRWeb 2 days ago.

Big Name Bank Hacks Highlight the Importance of Regular Testing and Effective Emergency Response

$
0
0
JPMorgan Chase & Co was one of the seven top-fifteen banks reported earlier this week to have recently suffered a cyber attack, which in their case allowed hackers to set up camp on their internal network for an extended stay without raising alarms, only to finally be discovered during routine security testing. Global Digital Forensics founder, Joe Caruso, discusses some of the lessons businesses should take from this perfect example of today’s realities in the world of cyber threats, and the difference regular testing and effective emergency response can make for businesses to survive a breach and its aftermath.

New York, NY (PRWEB) August 30, 2014

When a prominent bank reveals a successful cyber attack, national headlines will quickly ensue, as happened on Wednesday, August 27th, when news began surfacing about the FBI probing into a successful attack on JPMorgan Chase & Co and at least one other bank. But when news gets out that the FBI is actually investigating attacks on seven prominent banks, everyone starts thinking about their own accounts and how they may be affected, and the buzz quickly goes viral. Bloomberg followed up on Friday with a more detailed exposé which provides the latest insight into the attacks. Joe Caruso, founder and CEO/CTO of Global Digital Forensics (GDF), a premier national provider of cyber security solutions, hopes businesses will take the lessons these attacks highlight to heart. “Many important lessons can be learned from attacks like these,” Caruso says, “from the reality of the power of APTs (Advanced Persistent Threats), to the need for regular testing to catch stealthy threats which may already be residing on your network, and the importance of having an effective emergency response in place to help identify and stop an attack when it happens and significantly diminish the costly aftermath and regulatory nightmares which tend to follow.”

There is No Such Thing as “Perfect” Cyber Security

“High profile entities, especially banks like JPMorgan, aren’t known for taking cyber security lightly, and committing a reported quarter billion dollars to the effort, I think, illustrates that fact very clearly,” said Caruso. “But it also drives home another fact; no organization, no matter how huge and powerful, is totally immune to the threat posed by hackers, regardless of how many resources are thrown at the problem. But on the other side of the coin, it also doesn’t take a fortune to significantly improve an organization’s cyber security posture to help them thwart the vast majority of the threats out there. We help clients do it every day. The key is understanding the client’s data needs, digital architecture and assets, and marrying them to a customized solution that’s actually doable, from both a financial and reality standpoint. A restaurant probably doesn’t have to worry too much about state-sponsored foreign hackers spending months or years devising a plan to break into their network, like all the fingers pointing towards Russia so far for these hacks, but they would have to worry about semi-sophisticated organized crime rings targeting them for the bounty of credit card numbers which could be had. But a bank with the size and reach to influence the global economy, they do have to be thinking about APTs 24/7 and plan everything accordingly, and that is fleshed out by our experience in dealing with clients from both ends of the spectrum. In the end though, it usually comes down to effective emergency response. That’s what usually proves to be the difference between those who survive and thrive after a successful attack, and those who don’t and won’t. That’s why we have a network of experienced responders positioned across the country and on call 24/7, and yes, even on holidays like Labor Day coming up on Monday. It allows us to have response times unrivaled in the industry, and many times we can even start the remediation process remotely. So all it takes is one call and we can get on top of it right away.”

Testing for Resident Threats Early and Often

“Another lesson which should be taken from the hack on JPMorgan is the fact that they finally spotted the attack during routine security testing of their internal systems. Which is a point I can’t stress enough,” says Caruso, “the more often you have professional testing and deep scanning done, the less time a stealthy intruder will have with your network to wreak havoc. With all their resources, policies and procedures, all devised by some of the brightest minds in the security industry, they still missed the payload when it first got planted. But that’s the unfair security paradigm we all have to face - security has millions of holes to plug, attackers only have to find one, and often it’s a zero-day attack, which is an as-of-yet-unknown exploit which can be leveraged for access. It could also have been something as simple a phishing or spear phishing email, or a USB stick someone found left on a bench somewhere and decided to plug into their work system to see what’s on it, only to deliver an attacker's malware payload and give them the access they were after all along when they left their malware laden bait on the bench in the first place. Our vulnerability assessments and penetration testing plans are designed to find those weak links, raise awareness against social engineering ploys hackers commonly rely on, and uncover any existing and/or resident threats and thoroughly eradicate them, all with an eye on the appropriate regulatory compliance issues many clients face in their industries. So whether it’s things like GLB (Graham Leach Bliley) compliance for the financial industry, to HIPPA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) for healthcare providers, or PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) for retailers, if a client falls under any compliance regulation concerning PII (Personally Identifiable Information), we have plenty of experience helping clients navigate all the potential pitfalls and headaches."

Customized Cyber Security Solutions to Fit Any Organization

*Global Digital Forensics is a recognized industry leader in the fields of computer forensics, cyber security and emergency incident response, with years of experience assisting clients in the government, banking, healthcare, education and corporate arenas. For a free consultation with a Global Digital Forensics specialist, call 1-800-868-8189 about tailoring a cost-effective plan which will meet your unique needs, without wasting resources on solutions you simply don’t need. Emergency responders are also standing by 24/7 to handle intrusion and data breach emergencies whenever and wherever they arise. Time is critical if a cyber incident has occurred, so don’t hesitate to get help. For more information, visit http://www.evestigate.com. Reported by PRWeb 2 days ago.

Tax forms could pose challenge for HealthCare.gov

$
0
0
Some tax professionals are worried that federal and state insurance marketplaces won't be able to get those forms out in time, creating the risk of delayed tax refunds for millions of consumers. The Health and Human Services Department must send out millions of the forms, which are like W-2s for people getting tax credits to help pay health insurance premiums. HHS will have to manage that while in the midst of running the 2015 health insurance sign-up season, when millions more are expected to try to get coverage. The new health care law offers tax credits to help people without workplace coverage buy private health insurance. "If someone wound up having more overtime than they projected, or they received a bonus for good work, these are the kind of changes that have an impact on subsidies," said Ron Pollack, executive director of the advocacy group Families USA. Since the whole system is brand-new, experts are predicting that millions will end up having to repay money. Reported by SeattlePI.com 2 days ago.

Obama: Fight for a Stronger Middle Class

$
0
0
Americans have to keep fighting to build a "stronger middle class in today's changing economy," U.S. President Barack Obama said in his weekly address Saturday.  That fight includes the right to have affordable health insurance, fair pay, family leave and workplace flexibility, Obama said in a worker-focused address tailored for the Labor Day weekend. Raising the minimum wage would be one of the "best ways to give a boost to working families," the president... Reported by VOA News 2 days ago.

Obama Weekly Address: This Labor Day, Let's Talk About the Minimum Wage

$
0
0
Obama Weekly Address: This Labor Day, Let's Talk About the Minimum Wage In his Labor Day weekend weekly address, President Barack Obama uses the occasion to make another plea for a high minimum wage.

Transcript as follows:

Hi, everybody.  Whether you’re firing up the grill, fired up for some college football, or filling up the car for one last summer roadtrip – Happy Labor Day weekend.

We set aside Labor Day to honor the working men and women of America.  And this Labor Day, we’ve got more to celebrate.  Over the past 53 months, our businesses have added nearly 10 million new jobs.  Last month, for the first time since 1997, we created more than 200,000 jobs for six straight months.  And for the first time in over a decade, business leaders worldwide have declared, two years running, that the number one place to invest isn’t China – it’s America.

So there are reasons to be optimistic about where we’re headed.  And the decisions we make now will determine whether or not we accelerate this progress – whether economic gains flow to a few at the top, or whether a growing economy fuels rising incomes and a thriving middle class.

Think about it this Labor Day.  The things we often take for granted – Social Security and Medicare, workplace safety laws and the right to organize for better pay and benefits, even weekends – we didn’t always have these things.  Workers and the unions who get their back had to fight for them.  And those fights built a stronger middle class.

To build a stronger middle class in today’s changing economy, we’ve got to keep fighting.  We’ve got to fight for the right to affordable health insurance for everybody.  The right to fair pay, family leave, and workplace flexibility.  The right to a fair living wage. 

Let me focus on that last one for a minute.  In America, no one who works full-time should ever have to raise a family in poverty.  A hard day’s work deserves a fair day’s pay.  And raising the minimum wage would be one of the best ways to give a boost to working families.  It would help around 28 million Americans from all walks of life pay the bills, provide for their kids, and spend that money at local businesses.  And that grows the economy for everyone.

The bottom line is, America deserves a raise.  But until we’ve got a Congress that cares about raising working folks’ wages, it’s up to the rest of us to make it happen.  And in the year and a half since I first asked Congress to raise the minimum wage, Americans of all walks of life are doing just that.

Thirteen states and D.C. have done their part by raising their minimum wages.  Four more states have minimum wage initiatives on the ballot this November.  And the states where the minimum wage has gone up this year have experienced higher job growth than the states that haven’t. 

Business leaders at companies like The Gap are doing their part.  They’re raising base wages for tens of thousands of workers because they know it’s good for business.

Mayors across the country are doing their part.  Mayor Emanuel in Chicago and Mayor Garcetti in L.A. are working to lift their cities’ wages over time to at least thirteen dollars an hour.

I’ve tried to do my part by requiring companies that get contracts with the federal government to pay their workers a fair wage of ten dollars and ten cents an hour. 

And earlier this month, the president of Kentucky State University set a great example by giving himself a $90,000 pay cut, so that he could give raises to his lowest-paid employees.  His sacrifice will give more of his workers and their families a little extra money to help make ends meet. 

That’s how America built the greatest middle class the world has ever known.  Not by making sure a fortunate few at the top are doing well, but by making sure that everyone who’s willing to work hard and play by the rules can get ahead.  That’s the bedrock this country is built on.  Hard work.  Responsibility.  Sacrifice.  And looking out for one another as one united American family.

Let’s keep that in mind this Labor Day, and every day.  Have a great weekend, everybody.

Follow Breitbart.tv on Twitter @BreitbartVideo Reported by Breitbart 2 days ago.

Term Life Insurance Rates Now Found Nationally by New Insurer Finder Tool

$
0
0
Term life insurance rates quotations are now produced in real time using the Quotes Pros rates finder at http://quotespros.com/life-insurance.html.

Midland, TX (PRWEB) August 30, 2014

Information supplied by insurance companies has been helping the Quotes Pros company to introduce better prices to consumers in 2014. A group of ratess for term life insurance plans can be found when using the open system for adults at http://quotespros.com/life-insurance.html.

The national lookup system available to use this year can help the average person to quote a price for insurance based on general location and not from medical histories. The finder tool works under a zip code search process to support privacy during Internet research for affordable coverage plans.

"The national companies that appear inside the formatted tool this year are known agencies that are licensed to distribute plans across the country," said a Quotes Pros source.

The insurer system has been built with consumers in mind and allows complete privacy during an average search. Because no information will be entered by adults before pricing is displayed, the system remains a private source for learning about term or guaranteed life insurance plan pricing.

"The price drops and one-time discounts that companies provide through our system are meant to introduce variety to adults who have an interest in quoting agency pricing on the Internet," said the source.

The Quotes Pros company has maintained its support for locating insurer price data through its database since 2013. One new advantage for adults who enter the public portal for research is the direct sorting of agencies for life, health, automotive and motorcycle insurance at http://quotespros.com/health-insurance.html.

About QuotesPros.com

The QuotesPros.com company supplies men and women in the U.S. with a viable way to explore vehicle insurance and other formats for coverage using its open tools on its website. The company promotes different insurers inside of its database to broaden the reach of consumers. The QuotesPros.com company is now a source for learning the annual costs of life, motorcycle, health and business insurance plans that are offered nationally. Reported by PRWeb 1 day ago.

Experient Offers “Eat This, Not That” Nutrition Suggestions in Latest Blog Post

$
0
0
Dining on a nutrient-dense plan can be a difficult feat with the swirling and rush of busy schedules, but making healthy decisions isn’t only about eating better, it helps take steps to a healthier weight.

Richmond, VA (PRWEB) August 31, 2014

With convenient, inexpensive and tasty fast food options lurking around every corner, it can seem hard to make healthy food decisions all the time. However, making healthy choices can be easier because of the abundant less-sugar, less-fat options that are available throughout grocery stores.

That's what Experient Health, the health insurance arm of the Virginia Farm Bureau, reported this month in its blog series on health care reform, health insurance and health care issues. The blog was launched last year to keep the community informed of issues and trends that impact their lives.

This latest blog post highlighted which foods to eat and which to avoid, while still maintaining great flavor.

"Along with eating a variety of foods, balancing the food you eat with physical activity and choosing a diet moderate in sugars, saturated fat and sodium, using this brief, but out helpful “eat this, not that” guide can help get you started on your trek to a healthier lifestyle," Experient Health wrote. "It’s also important to keep in mind when making food choices that the average calorie intake for women and older adults is 1,600 calories, 2,800 for teenage boys, many active men and some very active women."

Below are a few examples of the ways that a food pyramid can be broken down to cater to healthy eating.

Meat Group:

Instead of beef (chuck, rib, brisket), chicken with skin, lunch meats (such as bologna), hot dogs, bacon or sausage refried beans, replace with loin, round beef, fat-trimmed chicken, low fat lunch meats, Canadian bacon or lean ham, canned kidney or pinto beans.

Grain Group:

Instead of granola sweetened cereals, pasta with cheese sauce, pasta with white sauce, or croissants and pastries, replace with reduced-fat granola, unsweetened cereals with cut-up fruit, pasta with vegetables, pasta with red sauce, and toast or bread (try to stick with whole grain).

Vegetable Group:

Instead of deep-friend french fries, backed potato with cheese sauce or fried vegetables, replace with oven-baked “french fries,” a baked potato with salsa or steamed/roasted vegetables.

To view all of the food groups and examples of “eat this, not that," visit this Experient Health blog post here.

Additional information on health eating on the food pyramid is available online at http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/publications/mypyramid/originalfoodguidepyramids/fgp/fgppamphlet.pdf. Reported by PRWeb 23 hours ago.

Exchange to increase health plans in state

$
0
0
Indiana residents will have more than triple the number of health insurance plans to choose from when the federal insurance exchange enrollment period starts in November, according to a state official. Reported by Journal Gazette 23 hours ago.

Morcellator Lawsuit News Update: A Growing Number of Health Plans Stop Covering Morcellator Surgery Due to Cancer Risk

$
0
0
Morcellator lawyers at The Onder Law Firm offer regular morcellator surgery lawsuit news updates at MorcellatorCancerLawsuitCenter.com.

(PRWEB) August 31, 2014

The link between morcellator surgery and the spread of cancer has led multiple health insurance plans to stop covering the procedure. The latest of these is the UPMC Health Plan, which serves Western Pennsylvania, according to an article in the Pittsburgh Business Times on August 27, 2014.* Attorneys handling morcellator lawsuits offer frequent morcellator lawsuit news and comprehensive morcellator claims information at the Morcellator Cancer Lawsuit Center website.

An FDA Safety Communication was issued on April 17, 2014**, warning the medical community and consumers of the risk of spreading cancer posed by morcellator surgery. Electronic power morcellators are medical devices used in gynecologic surgeries to remove uterine fibroids or the entire uterus, according to the safety communication. Morcellators mince ovarian tissues into small pieces which are removed through tiny incisions. The surgery is touted as minimally invasive, but the downside is that, should cancer cells be present, morcellator surgery can spread and advance the disease, according to the FDA. Federal regulators now discourage the use of power morcellators for laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries such as hysterectomy and myomectomy due to the risk of spreading undetected cancer.

UPMC’s decision to suspend coverage of morcellator surgery on August 15, 2014 was made “to protect patient safety”, according to the Pittsburgh Business Times article. Blue Cross Blue Shield, Harvard Pilgrim, and Fallon Health are among other insurance companies reportedly no longer providing coverage for gynecologic morcellator surgery.

Ethicon, Inc., the branch of Johnson & Johnson that manufactures and sells power morcellators in the United States, issued a voluntary recall for morcellator devices on July 31, 2014, according to the Ethicon website.***

Women and the family members of women around the nation who have been diagnosed with cancer follow a routine power morcellator surgery are filing lawsuits against Ethicon in light of the recall and the FDA warning. One such morcellator lawsuit was filed by Sarah Salem-Robinson and her husband Alan A. Robinson against Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation after Ms. Salem-Robinson was diagnosed with uterine cancer, according to court documents.**** The plaintiff underwent a supracervical hysterectomy surgery via power morcellator in May of 2012, according to court documents, and was diagnosed with cancer on May 30, 2012.

The Onder Law Firm, respected throughout the country for its superior work in family and product liability law, provides comprehensive information on morcellator surgery lawsuits for cancer claims at MorcellatorCancerLawsuitCenter.com. The morcellator attorneys offer no-cost, confidential case review to women and the family members of women who were diagnosed with cancer following morcellator surgery. Attorneys reviewing morcellator claims believe women who were diagnosed with cancer following hysterectomy or myomectomy surgery may be entitled to real compensation for the harm and damages they sustained.

The Onder Law Firm welcomes morcellator lawsuit inquiries from law firms in regards to handling them or working as co-counsel.

About The Onder Law Firm
Onder, Shelton, O’Leary & Peterson, LLC is a St. Louis based personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The pharmaceutical and medical device litigators at The Onder Law Firm have represented thousands of Americans in lawsuits against multinational conglomerates from products liability for manufacture of defective or dangerous products to deceptive advertising practices. Other firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation. It is also a recognized leader in products liability cases such as window blind cord strangulation. The Onder Law Firm offers information from morcellator surgery lawyers at http://www.morcellatorcancerlawsuitcenter.com.

*bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/blog/the-pulse/2014/08/upmc-health-plan-no-longer-covers-morcellation.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+industry_6+%28Industry+Health+Care%29
**fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm393576.htm
***ethicon.com/corporate
****Case 5:14-cv-02209-EJD - Salem-Robinson et al v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation Reported by PRWeb 10 hours ago.

Life Insurance Quotes Tool Installed for Public Use at New Insurer Portal Website

$
0
0
A life insurance quotes tool is now available for public usage in the U.S. through the Quotes Pros website at http://quotespros.com/life-insurance.html.

San Jose, CA (PRWEB) August 31, 2014

Adults in the U.S. who are ready to search for different forms of life insurance coverage can now use the Quotes Pros website as a resource to connect with agencies. The quotes tool added this year can help consumers to find and compare costs for policies at http://quotespros.com/life-insurance.html.

The public use of the search tool this year is expected to help educate men and women about the various insurers offering different coverage plans at various price points. The strength of the system is the zip code submit feature that returns a listing of companies in a geographic area ready to quote prices online.

"The public tools that we're offering to average consumers this year can help anyone to review accurate prices for different term, whole or guaranteed life policies," said a Quotes Pros source.

The installed system for public use requires a zip code to help format the insurers that are displayed to the public. Consumers using the system might not be able to receive a quotation due to the lack of insurers in a specific area although the zip feature helps to display valid agencies that can price different policies.

"The open tools that we provide make it an easy process for any person to secure a rate quotation from a number of agents in the USA supplying policies for life insurance," said the source.

The Quotes Pros company has enhanced its website this year with other forms of coverage that consumers can review. The insurer plans that are now available to review include health, automotive, motorcycle and renters plans that are priced individually through insurers in the system at http://quotespros.com/health-insurance.html.

About QuotesPros.com

The QuotesPros.com company website offers American consumers a way to find quotes from top agencies in the United States quoting coverage plans on the Internet. The website features a search tool that connects people with agencies in all areas of the U.S. The QuotesPros.com company has made it easier for consumers to find an assortment of price data through agencies compared with using phone quotation systems since 2013. Reported by PRWeb 7 hours ago.

Which Corporate Personality Are You: Market Basket or Hobby Lobby?

$
0
0
For the past six weeks, many of us in New England were startled out of our summer lethargy to see a rare coalition of workers, managers, customers and suppliers of the Market Basket grocery chain come together. And perhaps more remarkable and rarely heard these days was their message to the small group of Market Basket corporate shareholders: "We are stakeholders in this corporation -- as much, if not more so, than you."

As we head into Labor Day after this unlikely set of allies, driven primarily by workers who aren't formally unionized, has won its central demands - the reinstatement of fired CEO Arthur T. Demoulas and the acceptance by other family shareholders of "Artie Ts" buyout bid - many will be wondering if the Market Basket story will have any lasting significance.

In an era when the U.S. Supreme Court is rapidly expanding the bizarre and previously circumscribed legal fiction of corporate personhood, Market Basket offers a conception of the corporation that is a welcome counterpoint to the nearly feudal view underlying the recent Hobby Lobby case. Market Basket poses a stark choice to those real, live persons shaping any 21st century business: Will your company be one that recognizes a diversity of stakeholders to whom some responsibility is owed? Or one whose shareholders can impose their will on employees and others affected no matter what?

The Hobby Lobby case posed the question of whether that corporation had to comply with the Affordable Care Act's requirement that all employees be afforded full health insurance coverage for contraception. The majority of the Supreme Court reasoned essentially as follows: Corporations are legally "persons"; persons have certain rights protected under a statute called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA); a corporation's religious beliefs are determined by the beliefs of its owners; and in this case, the "owners of the businesses have religious objections to abortion, and according to their religious beliefs the four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients"; therefore, Hobby Lobby is not required to provide coverage for contraception.

Putting aside the fierce debate over whether the Court wrongly decided Hobby Lobby, what is significant here is the Court's underlying view of just who and what confers corporate personhood: property ownership. For five members of this Supreme Court, stock ownership trumps everything else. The religious freedom provided by RFRA is granted to shareholders alone.

This type of corporate "person" does not include, and so does not need to account for, the views of employees, managers, customers, suppliers, the local community or any other stakeholders. In effect, the shareholders are the lords of their corporation. Their beliefs are privileged over anyone else's. When as with Hobby Lobby there are only a handful of shareholders whose religious, political or economic views profoundly impact thousands of others, the feudal analogy becomes even more apt.

This "shareholders above all others" corporate personification is completely in line with a widely promoted (although historically relatively recent) assertion popularized particularly by Milton Friedman: that the sole purpose of a corporation is to maximize profits for its shareholders. It is precisely this view that the Market Basket coalition has just turned on its head.

Many of the 25,000 workers at Market Basket's 71 stores who rallied, urged customers not to shop there, and risked getting fired, told of just wanting to hold on to the respect and fair treatment they had experienced while Arthur T. was CEO. They were not rallying for higher wages or better benefits -Market Basket under Arthur Ts leadership reportedly was already paying starting clerks $12/hour and cashiers could earn over $40,000 a year. Instead, the workers said they were motivated by the sense of being part of a company family and the desire to carry on a company mission (including a commitment to low prices for their largely middle class consumers) that the ousted CEO had pursued over many years.

Before the virtual shutdown of Market Basket, the privately held company was reported to be highly profitable, with $4 billion in revenues. Indeed, in the lead-up to the recent showdown, the family group that ousted Arthur T. had voted to pay out a reported $250 million in special annual dividends to their nine shareholders.

In the Friedman worldview of corporations, shareholders deserve whatever they can vote themselves - they create corporate value by their investment, and are entitled to the resulting profits. Other considerations should be irrelevant to this corporate purpose. But to the employees of a corporation like Market Basket, some of whom started as teenagers and had worked for the same employer for over 40 years, and others who risked their livelihoods to support the virtual boycott of the past six weeks, the corporation's value was created by them - the entire family of Market Basket stakeholders. And to prove the point, their widely supported protests almost destroyed that value in just six weeks, as stores shelves and aisles went empty.

If corporations are increasingly able to exercise rights and privileges that used to be reserved for actual people -- engage in constitutionally protected speech that can trump campaign finance rules under the Citizens United ruling, or claim religious values that can trump social welfare legislation -then it becomes ever more important to ensure that the corporate "person" is composed of all those with a stake in the entity and its role in society: its workers, its managers, its customers as well as its financially benefited shareholders.

Market Basket is not alone in viewing its mission differently than some, perhaps the majority, of American corporations. There is a growing movement for states to charter benefit corporations - so-called B corporations -- that explicitly include a positive benefit to society as a corporate purpose. Some companies like Patagonia and perhaps Costco have essentially hard-wired a broader vision of corporate social responsibility into their way of doing business.

But at present and for the foreseeable future, the great majority of corporations will be owned and governed in a way that defines social benefit as a side effect, not a central mission. For these corporations, the increasingly urgent question should be: Which corporate personality are you? Reported by Huffington Post 1 day ago.

As newly insured seek care, rural doctor shortage worsens

$
0
0
As more people get health-insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act, the doctor shortage in rural areas is worsening. In Port Angeles, for example, a local clinic is turning away 250 callers a week. Reported by Seattle Times 1 day ago.

Report: 20,000 Georgians at risk of losing health insurance

$
0
0
More than 20,000 Georgians have until Friday to provide missing information or they will lose their insurance exchange coverage Sept. 30. The regional administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services told Georgia Health News on Friday that most of the data discrepancies involve immigration or citizenship issues. Letters requesting additional information were mailed in early August to 310,000 people in three dozen states that have their insurance exchange run by the federal… Reported by bizjournals 22 hours ago.

FINEOS Corporation Sponsors iFest Boston

$
0
0
FINEOS Corporation Sponsors iFest Boston DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--FINEOS Corporation, the market leading provider of core software solutions for the global Life, Accident and Health Insurance industry, in the Group, Voluntary and Individual Insurance markets announced today that it has signed on as a corporate sponsor for iFest Boston. iFest Boston is a premium three day festival showcasing the best of Ireland’s culture that will take place September 26 - 28 in Boston, MA. The event provides a unique networking platform for companies Reported by Business Wire 20 hours ago.

Let's Actually Have That Honest Conversation About Fixing Obamacare

$
0
0
The Affordable Care Act has already helped millions of Americans gain health insurance -- a big step forward. The debate over the ACA has been one of the most contentious we've ever seen. Fortunately, efforts to repeal it have been thwarted. Now's the time to have a conversation about making it work for every American.

At UNITE HERE, we are on the front lines fighting for workers. Our union represents 270,000 working people across North America in the hospitality industry and beyond. We change lives by improving wages and benefits in traditionally low-wage industries, creating good jobs that sustain families. We have been providing high quality, low-cost health benefits to our members for decades. We are predominantly women and people of color, and we hail from all corners of the planet. Together, we are building a movement to enable people of all backgrounds to achieve greater equality and opportunity. And, fixing Obamacare, so the landmark law meets its true potential, will help our members and many other Americans.

As with every major piece of legislation, especially those involving health care, the ACA wasn't perfect. But, it can -- and should -- be fixed. Unfortunately, without smart fixes, many Americans will lose coverage, have their hours cut or receive less comprehensive coverage. Fixing Obamacare's problems while preserving its gains demands an honest discussion nearly impossible in polarized Washington, D.C.

For the past couple years, everyone on both sides has been in battle mode. That has prevented progressives from addressing the changes needed to make Obamacare more effective. Of late, we have seen some key players in the debate to pass the law, like Rep. Henry Waxman and former Rep. Barney Frank, start to speak out.

Having that discussion is critical. Every major piece of legislation that has moved our nation forward, including Social Security and Medicare, has required adjustments. That's a normal part of the process -- or would be absent the intransigence of the Tea Party.

That is why our union launched a new website, Obamacarefixit.org. The homepage is titled, "Fixing Obamacare: An Honest Discussion" and will provide in-depth white papers analyzing key issues and a blog that will examine issues that remain to be fixed if Obamacare is to live up to its full, intended potential.

We'll monitor developments in the law -- and take note of the ongoing discussion about it. Among the topics that we'll address:
· How the ACA Exchanges have turned into insurance company profit pipelines· The law's successes in expanding coverage and reducing insecurity· How corporations like food service giant Sodexo are taking advantage of loopholes and incentives to drop coverage· IRS and Treasury rulings that hurt workers and protect executives· Why not-for-profit health plans serving 20 million people are in jeopardy· How Washington's polarized politics have encouraged all sides to exaggerate and mislead the public. And much, much more.
It's pretty clear that Washington is dysfunctional. Republicans have been trying to block Obamacare for years. And they won't give up, despite the way the law has helped millions of uninsured Americans. On the other hand, Democrats have not faced up the fact that fixes must be made. They know that has to happen.

The launch of this website is a modest step to give voice to commonsense fixes that must be made to make Obamacare work for more Americans. Ideally, groups from across the spectrum would work together to address many of the unintended consequences of the ACA. But, we're not naive. That's not going to happen in today's political climate. It's going to be up to progressives to make Obamacare function in the way it should. It's up to those of us who want it to work to demand fixes that help hard working Americans.

We also know the conversation about fixing Obamacare will continue into the 2016 election cycle. We look forward to discussing our concerns and suggestions with candidates for President who are looking for our support. Same goes for Senators who are up in 2016. Reported by Huffington Post 19 hours ago.

Here's Where Obamacare Has Made The Most Progress

$
0
0
More than 8 million people enrolled in private health insurance under Obamacare for 2014, topping expectations despite a rocky start. But that's less than one-third of the number of people who could have signed up -- a sign of the huge untapped market for Obamacare coverage and the challenges still facing the program.

In their first year, the Affordable Care Act's insurance exchanges signed up 28 percent of the people eligible to use them -- mainly people who don't get health benefits from their jobs or from a government program like Medicare or Medicaid -- according to an analysis by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

And there was a lot of variation among the states: Some captured a big share of the market for these customers and others barely made a dent, as this map illustrates:
Infographic by Jan Diehm for The Huffington Post.

Using data from the Census Bureau and the Department of Health and Human Services, the Kaiser Family Foundation estimates 28.6 million U.S. residents are eligible to buy health insurance via an exchange, compared to the 8 million who did.

Growing the insurance exchanges created by President Barack Obama's health-care reform law is key to continuing to shrink the ranks of the uninsured and to enrolling a broad and diverse population of customers that can spread the cost of the sickest patients across a large number of people.

The foundation's analysis includes people who remain uninsured and people who buy their insurance directly from an insurance company without accessing the exchange or applying for financial aid. The estimate excludes people who qualify for Medicaid, and those who aren't allowed to use an exchange, such as undocumented immigrants and workers who turn down their employers' health plans. It also excludes people who live in states that didn't expand Medicaid and who earn too little to qualify for subsidized private insurance.

The early enrollees also are seen as those in greatest need: They had pre-existing conditions that shut them out of the pre-Obamacare market, qualified for subsidies available to people who earn up to four times the federal poverty level -- about $94,000 for a family of four -- or both. Eight-five percent of the 8 million people who enrolled received tax credits that reduced their monthly premiums, and millions more who didn't sign up for the financial assistance are eligible.

People who earn too much to get financial help or are eligible for only small subsidies may have preferred to avoid the exchanges, especially given their glitches. And insurers in some states offered products outside the exchanges with more choices of providers and other features.

The technical failings of the federal HealthCare.gov website and several state-run exchanges hampered exchange enrollment, driving some consumers to buy directly from an insurance company, even if they might have gotten subsidies on an exchange. Poor public understanding of how the exchanges worked, and especially about the availability of financial assistance, also depressed enrollment.

The share of the potential market that signs up through an exchange is expected to grow. Enrollment on the exchanges for next year begins again Nov. 15 and runs until Feb. 15, and millions more people are expected to use these marketplaces to shop for coverage. By 2017, the Congressional Budget Office projects, 25 million people will get their health insurance this way, including those who get subsidies and those who don't.

Websites that actually work would boost enrollment. More choices of insurance companies in most states, modest premium increases for a significant number of plans and the ability to comparison-shop should lure more consumers to explore the exchanges. And people who were allowed to keep their pre-Obamacare insurance this year after having it canceled will have to transition eventually to plans that meet the law's benefit standards.

What's more, the minimum penalty for not complying with Obamacare's individual mandate that nearly everyone be covered jumps from $95 this year to $325 in 2015.

Policy decisions made by state leaders partly account for the wide variation among states.

"States that wanted to make the law work clearly did better than states that didn't. It's not a one-to-one correspondence, but it's a strong effect," said Larry Levitt, senior vice president for special initiatives at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Seven of the top 10 states had exchanges that were either state-operated or jointly run by the state and the federal government. That includes California, which signed up 1.4 million people, or almost 43 percent of the potential market.

But a large share of eligible Floridians signed up via the federal exchange, owing to concentrated efforts by the Obama administration and enrollment organizations, Levitt said. The troubles with the state-run exchanges in Minnesota, Maryland and Hawaii put them in the bottom 10, along with the federal-state partnership exchange in Iowa.

The ranking also reveals some peculiarities among the states. Vermont consolidated more than 85 percent of its individual health-insurance market into its exchange, largely because that state and the District of Columbia are the only jurisdictions that don't let consumers buy insurance another way.

In Iowa and South Dakota, the company that had the most customers before Obamacare, Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, didn't participate in the exchanges. The federal marketplaces in those states was denied the biggest player's marketing muscle, and Wellmark customers inclined to stay with the company didn't use the exchanges, Levitt said. Wellmark is joining the Iowa and South Dakota exchanges for 2015.

Massachusetts has had an insurance exchange since 2006 and near-universal coverage before Obamacare, leaving a small pool of people not already participating. And the state's exchange website performed poorly.

Although the exchanges will attract more customers next year and in the future, there are obstacles, Levitt said.

The 2015 enrollment period is just three months, half the duration of the 2014 sign-up window, and there will be fewer resources available to help people with the application process. Federal and state authorities also will have to devote efforts to retaining current customers. And there will be less publicity about the exchanges the second time around because it's no longer novel. Plus, the people who didn't sign up already may be the most challenging to enroll, Levitt said.

"It's going to be a lot harder for the program to exceed expectations in the second year than in the first year -- and the first year was plenty hard," Levitt said. Reported by Huffington Post 17 hours ago.

Amid dueling lawsuits, state needs Oracle's help with health-insurance site transition

$
0
0
Oregon officials still need Oracle’s cooperation to meet a looming deadline related to the state’s troubled health-insurance exchange website, even as both sides have lodged lawsuits against one another.

The state hired Oracle to help it build the website, Cover Oregon, as part of the government’s health-care overhaul. Much like the federal site, Healthcare.gov, Cover Oregon suffered major performance problems upon its go-live date in October, but unlike Healthcare.gov, Cover Oregon was never stabilized and brought into proper working order.

Oregon has since decided to transition the site to Healthcare.gov for those enrolling in commercial insurance plans, while using some of the technology Oracle built for a site aimed at enrolling people in a Medicaid-funded state health program.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here Reported by PC World 16 hours ago.

Insurers Using Familiar Playbook to Protect Profits in California

$
0
0
For the next two months, Californians will to be subjected to a barrage of TV, radio and online ads, which, ironically, they unknowingly will be paying for with their health insurance premiums.

The ads are a part of a multi-pronged, multimillion dollar campaign -- developed by public relations, advertising firms and political consultants for the state's biggest insurers -- to convince voters that an initiative on the Nov. 4 ballot designed to protect them against unreasonable rate increases will actually cause their premiums to go up.

As of last week, a small handful of health insurers had contributed tens of millions of dollars to an organization called Californians Against Higher Health Care Costs. If you think the companies' CEOs opened their personal checkbooks to finance that group's work, think again. It is their customers that are paying for the propaganda campaign.

Californians Against Higher Health Care Costs (CAHHCC) is not a grassroots, consumer-led organization as the name implies. If you check out its website, you'll read that it's a "coalition of doctors, nurses, hospitals, health plans, and California employers" who want the state's residents to vote against Proposition 45, which would give the state's insurance regulators the ability to reject health insurance rate increases they deem excessive.

But while a number of business and health care provider groups presumably have joined the coalition, it doesn't appear that any of them have put any money on the table. According to state filings, the campaign is being financed almost exclusively by five insurers with the most customers in the state: Anthem/WellPoint; Blue Shield of California; Kaiser Foundation Health Plan; Health Net; and UnitedHealthcare.

Of $37.9 million donated to CAHHCC as of August 22, $37.3 million came from those insurers and their PR and lobbying group, the California Association of Health Plans. The rest came from a small group of insurance brokers and their PR and lobbying groups, the California Association of Health Underwriters and the National Association of Health Underwriters.

The main argument cited by these groups' opposition to Proposition 45 is that it might interfere with the efforts of Covered California, the state's health insurance exchange, to provide individuals and small businesses with affordable coverage options in a timely fashion.

California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, who is up for re-election this year, rejects that argument. In a letter to state lawmakers this summer, Jones wrote that if voters pass Proposition 45, his department -- which has long had the ability to reject proposed rate increases from auto and property and casualty insurers -- will work cooperatively with other state agencies "to ensure that rates are reviewed and approved to meet Covered California...deadlines."

Jones also pointed out that insurance regulators in 35 other states already have the ability to disapprove unreasonable rate increases, and he offered a point-by-point rebuttal of a report commissioned by the insurance industry that suggested Proposition 45 could undermine provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

Jones wrote that his department has had more than three years' experience reviewing individual and small group health insurance rates under the federal reform law "including experience last year completing review of health insurance rates in time to meet Covered California's deadlines to allow health insurers to offer health insurance in the California exchange."

As a former health insurance company executive, I'd be willing to bet that the state's health insurers care far less about meeting Covered California's deadlines than meeting their profit goals. Their real concern, in my opinion, is that regulators with more experience reviewing insurers' business practices than Covered California staffers might be more likely to detect proposed rate increases designed more to pad their bottom lines than to cover expected increases in medical costs.

According to the Los Angeles Times, a recent poll showed that 69 percent of registered California voters support Proposition 45, which means that the health insurers have their work cut out for them. But $38 million deployed strategically can change a lot of minds. And insurers know from successful campaigns they've conducted in the past that carefully targeted negative ads -- and the use of front groups and surrogates -- can quickly turn public opinion..

Having been a part of planning and implementing such campaigns in my previous career, I can tell that the industry is conducting a "bifurcated" campaign in California. The industry's message for conservatives, communicated by its allies in publications like Breitbart.com, is that if a Proposition 45 passes, Democrat Jones would become a health care "czar" empowered to destroy the "free market."

Another message for conservatives is that it would enable "trial lawyers who fund Jones's campaigns" to get rich by intervening on behalf of health plan members and policyholders in the rate-approval process by filing "frivolous lawsuits" against health insurers.

The industry's key message to scare liberals, communicated by its "coalition," is showing up in media seldom seen by most conservatives. Some of that $38 million was spent last week on an ad in Salon.com featuring a large picture of President Barack Obama and this message: "Protect Obamacare from Legal Attacks. Prop 45's Dirty Little Secret: More Attacks Against Obamacare. Vote No on 45!"

I will continue to monitor the industry's campaign and write more about it in the weeks ahead. Reported by Huffington Post 16 hours ago.

Problems abound with health law immigration papers

$
0
0
More than 300,000 immigrants around the country who bought health insurance through the Affordable Care Act could lose their coverage if they dont send in proof they are legally in the U.S. Reported by MyNorthwest.com 14 hours ago.

Florida Immigrants Could Lose Insurance Coverage If They Don’t Act Soon

$
0
0
Florida and Texas have the largest numbers of immigrants in the nation who bought health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and could lose their coverage if they don't send in proof they are legally in the U.S. Reported by cbs4.com 14 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images