Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Health Law Analyst: Obamacare 'Setting People up for Large and Avoidable Premium Increases'

$
0
0
Health Law Analyst: Obamacare 'Setting People up for Large and Avoidable Premium Increases' WASHINGTON (AP) — If you have health insurance on your job, you probably don't give much thought to each year's renewal. But make the same assumption in one of the new health law plans, and it could lead to costly surprises.

Insurance exchange customers who opt for convenience by automatically renewing their coverage for 2015 are likely to receive dated and inaccurate financial aid amounts from the government, say industry officials, advocates and other experts.

If those amounts are too low, consumers could get sticker shock over their new premiums. Too high, and they'll owe the tax man later.

Automatic renewal was supposed to make the next open-enrollment under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul smooth for consumers.

But unless the administration changes its 2015 approach, "they're setting people up for large and avoidable premium increases," said researcher Caroline Pearson, who follows the health law for the market analysis firm Avalere Health.

It could be a new twist on an old public relations headache for the White House: You keep the health plan you like but get billed way more.

"It was our preference for (the administration) to have the capacity to update people's subsidy information, but they haven't been able to get that built," said Brendan Buck, a spokesman for the industry trade group America's Health Insurance Plans.

Here's the issue, in a nutshell:

To streamline next year's open enrollment season, the Health and Human Services Department recently proposed offering automatic renewal to 8 million consumers who are already signed up.

But the fine print of the HHS announcement said consumers who auto enroll will get the "the exact dollar amount" of financial aid they are receiving this year.

That's likely to be a problem for a couple of reasons, not to mention inflation.

First, financial aid is partly based on premiums for a current benchmark plan in the community where the consumer lives. Because more plans are joining the market and insurers are submitting entirely new bids for 2015, the benchmark in many communities will be different.

Second, financial aid is also based on household income. If your income goes down, you are entitled to a bigger health insurance tax credit. If it goes up, you get less. The 2014 amounts could well be out of date and incorrect for many people. Financial assistance is also affected by age, family size and where people live.

And that doesn't get into another motivation for consumers to shop around: Premiums and choices for 2015 are changing, so your current plan may no longer be a good deal.

"Just continuing in the same plan with the same credit is not going to be the optimal outcome for most people," said Judy Solomon of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which advocates for low-income people. "Your 2014 credit is going to be lower in most cases, and in some cases it could be too high."

About 8 in 10 of those who signed up for private coverage under the health care law are getting financial aid. In the 36 states served by the federal insurance exchange, the tax credits average $264 a month, reducing the average monthly premium of $346 to just $82.

Even with such generous subsidies, about 4 in 10 who bought a health law plan say they have trouble paying their premiums, according to a poll by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

Open enrollment starts Nov. 15, and consumers who already have a policy will have just about a month to renew or make changes to avoid a break in coverage Jan. 1. Millions of new customers are also expected to try to sign up for the first time.

New Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell is hoping that auto renewal will simplify things, a welcome change from this year's website problems.

But the subsidy scheme created by Congress to keep premiums affordable has so many moving parts that it's turning out to be difficult for the government to administer.

Administration spokesman Aaron Albright says all consumers are encouraged to contact their health insurance exchange to update any changes in personal and financial details. You can do that at any time, before the open-enrollment crunch.

However, you will have to wait until the fall to change to a new plan for next year.

Even if the financial aid amounts are off the mark, some advocates say auto renewal is still a safeguard to keep some people from falling through the cracks.

"It is not a perfect solution, but I'm not sure that there is a better solution in terms of protecting people so they don't lose health coverage," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an advocacy group supporting the overhaul.

___

Online:

http://www.HealthCare.gov Reported by Breitbart 8 hours ago.

Plan to simplify 2015 health renewals may backfire

$
0
0
If you have health insurance on your job, you probably don't give much thought to each year's renewal. But make the same... Reported by Deseret News 6 hours ago.

Media on Middle East, ACA in Court, GMOs in Food

$
0
0
*LISTEN HERE:*

By Mark Green

Matalin and Corn debate déjà vu news - Israel back in Gaza and ACA back in court. Consensus: there's not a media bias but a rough balance between pro-Israel talking heads and the flood of photos of dead civilians. Also: why not label GMOs in processed food?

*On Israel back in Gaza - Media Bias?* The Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal denounces one-sided media coverage as we listen to Jon Stewart mock how hard it is for journalists to even discuss this conflict. That right?

"There's no issue more fraught with charges of media bias from both sides," concludes David Corn of Mother Jones, dismissing charges that the New York Times has slanted coverage by supposedly creating a moral equivalence. Mary agrees. "The problem is that each side is intensely in its 'silo' without adequate consideration of the larger context of a Mideast re-jiggered by the Arab Spring."

Conclusion: yes two peoples/one land, but a) Hamas clearly started this war by launching rockets after the murders of three Israeli youth and one Palestinian boy; b) are aiming at civilian populations; and c) do not accept Israel's right to exist. While American media in general do have far more Israeli/Jewish leaders and commentators on air that's roughly counter-balanced by the flood of horrendous photos of dead Palestinian civilians due to Israel's bombing campaign.

Both discount any moral equivalence between the two sides. But they are concerned that the eventual loss of a Jewish majority in the "Jewish State" combined with reliance of Israel on the U.S. means that recurring wars eroding popular support for Israel aren't tenable. For example, while a clear majority of Americans over 40 consider Israel's response in Gaza to be justified, by 2-1 people under 40 do not. Corn: "Not everything that's justified is right or effective."

Sooner rather than later, there has to be a two-state solution. But after this month, it would appear to be later.

*On Obamacare Back in Court.* Milton wrote that "a poet can survive anything except a misprint." Laws too.

Can Obamacare subsidies be provided to citizens of states with federal exchanges rather than only those on state exchanges? One line in the 1,500-page law said there would be subsidies only for state exchanges while the rest of the law and congressional intent clearly indicates both exchanges. What now since the 4th and DC Circuits split on this issue?

Mary predicts that the Supreme Court will resolve the discrepancy by sending the issue back to the states. David thinks that the full DC Circuit would review the panel's 2-1 decision and, given the 7-4 lineup of Ds to Rs, would and should reverse the perverse conclusion that 6 million-plus Americans might lose their health insurance due to one obvious drafting error.

The Host adds that Republican candidates in red/purple states should be nervous this fall having to explain why tens of thousands of people would lose their health coverage and perhaps their lives - or pay double or triple in premiums - despite the unanimity of opinion that Congress intended no such thing. Mary argues that her coverage did triple while David counters that data shows only small premium increases. (Consumer Advice: she should probably go on an Exchange and shop around if her insurer tried to rip her off like that!)

*On Mein Kampf back in Germany, Israel.* This was easy: should Mein Kampf be allowed to be published in Germany? In Israel? Ron Lauder, head of the World Jewish Congress, thinks not.

"Absolutely" answers Mary. "Book banning is immoral and counter-productive. We must know our history." David completely concurs. "How can we allow some people to decide which books can be published?"

*On GMO labeling.* The Host interviews Jean Halloran of Consumer Reports about the huge controversy over the labeling of GMOs in 70 percent of our processed food. Europe does require such disclosure. The result: when consumers had a knowing choice between food with GMOs and without, they chose those without since they were no more expensive.

Again, consensus. Though there aren't studies showing GMOs to be dangerous, neither have they been adequately researched unlike, say, drugs under the 1938 and 1962 food, drug and cosmetic acts.

So far, one state, Vermont, requires GMO labels while two others - California and Washington State - voted it down in a referendum after giant food companies outspent opponents 6-1. The FDA is looking at the issue but, explains Halloran, it may lack the statutory authority to test GMOs as it does drugs and additives. So the issue appears likely headed to Congress... where nothing this controversial now seems capable of enactment.

Mark Green is the creator and host of Both Sides Now.

You can follow him on Twitter @markjgreen

Send all comments to Bothsidesradio.com, where you can also listen to prior shows.
Both Sides Now is available
Sat. 5-6 PM EST From Lifestyle TalkRadio Network
& Sun. 8-9 AM EST from Business RadioTalk Network. Reported by Huffington Post 2 hours ago.

Insurance Quotes for Car, Truck and SUV Owners Now Include Full Coverage Rates at Insurer Portal Online

$
0
0
Insurance quotes for consumers now include car, SUV, truck and van policies for coverage at the Quotes Pros website. The quotations are now supplied at http://quotespros.com/auto-insurance.html.

Cincinnati, OH (PRWEB) July 27, 2014

Exploring the different price structures that are offered by car insurance companies used to requires telephone contact with agencies. The Quotes Pros company has created a virtual solution for obtaining insurance quotes for car, SUV, van and truck owners this year through its website at http://quotespros.com/auto-insurance.html.

The amount of companies contributing price data inside the searchable database listed on the Quotes Pros homepage has increased the search solutions for the public this year. There are now full coverage options that are available to sort through to help a driver find the top coverage amounts.

"A good price is an important component of any insurance policy and our website provides a price review matching function," said a Quotes Pros rep.

The full coverage automobile insurer prices that are now searchable using the company database are mixed in with the standard pricing that is attached to liability packages. Used vehicle owners who prefer the most basic types of coverage for a vehicle can still request a state minimum quote.

"We've adjusted the packages that are available from agencies this year and have created a good resource to find shifts in pricing and coverage options," said the rep.

The Quotes Pros company is helping to inform consumers about the price changes and other options that agencies in the U.S. are promoting this year. Packages for life insurance and health insurance can be quoted using the sets of tools available at http://quotespros.com/life-insurance.html.

About QuotesPros.com

The QuotesPros.com company helps the American public to find better rates for insurance policies that are marketed across the country by licensed agencies. The definitive search platform installed for any person to access uses a zip code to perform an in-depth search. The QuotesPros.com company adds different formats for insurance coverage to its digitally enhanced search tool weekly to expand consumer confidence during use. Reported by PRWeb 39 minutes ago.

Direct Auto Insurance Portal Now Helping to Quote National Coverage Plans Online

$
0
0
Direct auto insurance price tool is now helping consumers to find national pricing thanks to the Bright Sky Insurance website. Prices for plans can be accessed from http://brightskyinsurance.com/auto-insurance.html.

Seattle, WA (PRWEB) July 27, 2014

Insurance companies in the United States have invested into creating digital systems that produce a generic price quote upon request by consumers over the past several years online. The Bright Sky Insurance company has launched its direct auto insurance portal this year to help quote national plans at http://brightskyinsurance.com/auto-insurance.html.

The coverage types available for a consumer to review include options other than the base packages that local agencies underwrite for motorists. The direct rates that can be reviewed are tied to liability, full coverage and other specific coverage options that motorists request from companies.

"Our website gives more than an overview of basic pricing and allows a direct contact with selected companies to finish the purchase of a quoted policy online," said a BrightSkyInsurance.com rep.

The quotes that are delivered while entering the Bright Sky search platform are now calculated in real time. A consumer uses a zip code as the source of entry to the system to begin the reviews and comparisons of annual prices that agencies in the U.S. are offering.

"We're now one of the only independent sources that gathers multiple agency rates into a single database for consumers to access to conduct their own price discovery procedures," said the rep.

The Bright Sky Insurance company has introduced other ways to seek out policy providers this year aside from what is available in the automobile industry. Special rates for life insurance, homeowners insurance and health insurance are easy to view at http://brightskyinsurance.com/health-insurance.html.

About BrightSkyInsurance.com

The BrightSkyInsurance.com company provides a quote section on its website that showcases immediate prices from new and existing companies in the insurance industry on the Internet. The price features that are available to consumers help take the search issues out of the equation. The BrightSkyInsurance.com company presents pricing and does not collect inputted data from the public while using its search platform to contribute to consumers security. Reported by PRWeb 39 minutes ago.

United States: Territories Not Bound By Key ACA Insurance Market Provisions - Reed Smith

$
0
0
CMS has reversed course on the applicability of certain ACA provisions to health insurance issuers in the territories. Reported by Mondaq 16 hours ago.

Alta Resources To Fill Approximately 600 Positions In Neenah

$
0
0
Expanding client programs spur growth and create need for regular and seasonal positions at Alta Resources’ Neenah campus

Neenah, Wisconsin (PRWEB) July 28, 2014

Alta Resources, a global provider of customer management business process outsourcing (BPO) for Fortune 500 brands, announced today that it plans to fill more than 2,500 jobs across its locations in Wisconsin, California, Florida and the Philippines. More than 600 of those jobs will be based at its Neenah campus.

A majority of the hiring is to support several health-insurance clients, which have seasonal ramp-ups that require additional staffing in preparation for the Annual Enrollment Period (AEP), November 2014 through February 2015. As more consumers become eligible for health-plan coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Alta Resources’ health-insurance clients anticipate an increase in contact volumes during AEP. Alta Resources plays a strategically important role in assisting these clients with their year-round and seasonal needs, including servicing the increase in health-plan questions, leads and enrollment.

The seasonal positions range from full to part time, and the company noted that various regular full- and part-time roles are also available. Positions are immediate, and qualified applicants will start as soon as possible.

Lisa Schulze, vice president of human resources at Alta Resources, said, “We have core values that we call ‘Guiding Principles.’ We have seven of them. It’s difficult to attribute our growth to just one, but, if I had to, I’d say our Guiding Principle of Results is most fitting. We’re looking for people who, in embodying our Guiding Principles, are eager to learn, excel and deliver defined results for our leading client brands.”

Available opportunities include customer care; inbound sales, including licensed health-insurance sales; technology and back-office support; fulfillment; and team leadership. Alta Resources offers a variety of advantages to job seekers: flexible schedules completely tailored to individuals’ lifestyle, paid training, competitive pay, a team-based culture, skills development and advancement potential for high performers. The company also pays for health-insurance sales licensing for qualified candidates; licensing will be for the specific state(s) a sales representative will service and is his/hers to retain for as long as the license is valid, meaning it can be reused in the future.

To fill the roles, the company is asking interested candidates to visit JoinAlta.com to search current openings, create a profile and apply. They can also get details pertaining to Alta Resources’ upcoming job events.

Alta Resources has revealed plans to, on Tuesday, August 12, host a casual, come-as-you-are job fair at the Holiday Inn, 123 E. Wisconsin Ave. in downtown Neenah. Those who attend will have opportunities for immediate, on-site interviews; question-and-answer sessions with Alta Resources’ hiring professionals; and more. Interested candidates are encouraged to apply online at JoinAlta.com prior to the job fair.

Schulze concluded, “Events like job fairs are unique opportunities for interested candidates to immediately and directly network with Alta Resources’ professionals. We have a number of events planned over the next few months at all our locations, and they’ll feature immediate interviews, a chance to learn more about Alta Resources and the available job openings, and so much more.”

The job fair will run from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Those unable to attend are invited to walk in and apply at Alta Resources’ 120 N. Commercial St. location (Neenah) during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. They can also apply at JoinAlta.com.

About Alta Resources

Formed in 1995, privately held Alta Resources is a leading provider of customer management business process outsourcing (BPO) for many of the world’s best-known brands in a variety of industries, including consumer-packaged goods (CPG), health care and insurance, and entertainment. With its comprehensive service lines — care, sales, e-commerce, back office and fulfillment — working in tandem, clients can seamlessly integrate their core business processes through a single partner. In turn, Alta Resources helps clients improve and better manage their customer experiences across every touch point, online and offline, ultimately delivering results that provide sales growth and/or cost savings.

With headquarters, a main campus and a fulfillment facility in Neenah, Wisconsin, Alta Resources has additional operations in Michigan, California, Florida and the Philippines. To learn more, visit AltaResources.com.

### Reported by PRWeb 15 hours ago.

United States: Circuits Split Regarding Validity of Federal Subsidies of Health Insurance Purchased on Federally-Established Exchanges - Littler Mendelson

$
0
0
Two federal courts issued opposing decisions regarding whether the IRS can extend federal tax subsidies for health insurance coverage through a federal Exchange. Reported by Mondaq 15 hours ago.

Employer Health Insurance: A Bargain Compared to Government-Sponsored Coverage

$
0
0
After years of slowing growth, employer health costs are forecast to climb at a faster pace next year, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers. Even with that projected growth, employers are spending much less per person than is the government -- about 60 percent less, concludes a new study from the American Health Policy [...] Reported by Forbes.com 13 hours ago.

Which Private Sector Businesses Have Stopped Offering Employee Health Insurance?

$
0
0
Which Private Sector Businesses Have Stopped Offering Employee Health Insurance? Reported by ajc.com 14 hours ago.

He lost 100 pounds with a plant-based diet

$
0
0
Having to ask for a seat belt extender on a flight was one of Benji Kurtz's biggest life humiliations.

He also couldn't shop at popular clothing stores -- the clothing wasn't large enough. When he found clothing that fit, he often didn't have a choice in styles or colors, able only to purchase pants available in size 50.

At his heaviest, in 2005, Kurtz weighed 278 pounds. Only 5 feet 5 inches tall, he was considered severely obese.

For several years he cycled around low-carb diets to temporarily lose 30 to 40 pounds, only to gain it back. None of the many other diets he tried worked, either. Then, by chance, the solution found him.

Over Memorial Day weekend 2013, Kurtz and his wife watched "Forks Over Knives," a documentary on the science behind plant-based eating. At that point, he weighed 258 pounds.

The scientific evidence presented on why humans should eat a plant-based diet just made sense to Kurtz. It was like a light bulb went on, he explains.

He read numerous books and watched online lectures to learn more as he began eating from the four food groups recommended by the Physicians' Committee for Responsible Medicine: Fruits, vegetables, whole grains and legumes (with nuts and seeds). Gradually, he cut out sugar, salt and oils.

"As I saw the scientific evidence of how we have evolved as herbivores and not omnivores, and as I saw how well my body was reacting to feeding it a low-fat, whole-food, plant-based diet, it became progressively easier from there," said Kurtz, a 37-year-old entrepreneur in Atlanta.

The quick results were encouraging.

It wasn't just his weight that started to drop. His cholesterol went from over 200 to 167. His blood pressure lowered. His health insurance rates also went down three times as he got healthier.

At the same time, other things were on the rise, including his energy levels and his ability to taste food.

"Once you start eating this way, your palate totally changes," Kurtz said. "You are tasting food the way food was supposed to taste in the first place. Like a film has been lifted off your taste buds."

He also discovered that he could eat as much as he wanted of the right foods and not gain weight. His new way of eating felt more like abundance than deprivation.

Breakfast foods included oatmeal and fruit smoothies with almond milk. For lunch or dinner, his favorite foods became steamed vegetables with a faux Parmesan seasoning, red lentil chili, baked potatoes, vegan mac and cheese and split pea soup. If he got hungry in between meals, unsalted and unroasted nuts, fruit or chia pudding made with almond milk were his snacks.

After one year and one day on his new diet, Kurtz had successfully lost 100 pounds. He now weighs 138, his pant size is 31 -- 19 sizes smaller than his heaviest -- and he wears a size small in shirts.

Kurtz's story isn't uncommon, says Dr. John McDougall, a California physician who has been studying the effect of nutrition on disease for over 30 years and who answered diet questions from Kurtz during his transformation. After moving people away from a rich, high-fat American diet full of meat and dairy, McDougall says he's seen patients lose weight, be cured of constipation and lower their cholesterol levels.

One of the biggest keys to these results, he says, is understanding that humans have always been primarily starch eaters; starches aren't bad. Pasta, beans, rice, corn and potatoes are foods that satisfy the body and can be alternatives to meat and dairy.

"People think they are going to starve to death if they don't eat a hamburger," McDougall said.

McDougall went on to say that the marketing of meat and dairy has become so effective that we often associate calcium with dairy and protein with meat, when, according to him, it's quite easy to get those nutrients from a natural, vegetarian diet.

Kurtz credits his ease in transitioning into this plant-based diet to living close to a grocery store where he could purchase healthy foods and working from home, which made it easier to cook. He also found a quiet indoor pool with a friendly staff where he swims around 20 laps six to seven days a week.

"I don't crave foods I no longer eat. I'm not going to bed hungry. Everything about life is better." Reported by Click Orlando 11 hours ago.

Alta Resources to Fill Approximately 700 Positions in Brea

$
0
0
Expanding client programs spur growth and create need for regular and seasonal positions at Alta Resources’ Brea campus.

Brea, CA (PRWEB) July 28, 2014

Alta Resources, a global provider of customer management business process outsourcing (BPO) for Fortune 500 brands, announced today that it plans to fill more than 2,500 jobs across its locations in Wisconsin, California, Florida and the Philippines. More than 700 of those jobs will be based at its Brea campus.

A majority of the hiring is to support several health-insurance clients, which have seasonal ramp-ups that require additional staffing in preparation for the Annual Enrollment Period (AEP), November 2014 through February 2015. As more consumers become eligible for health-plan coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Alta Resources’ health-insurance clients anticipate an increase in contact volumes during AEP. Alta Resources plays a strategically important role in assisting these clients with their year-round and seasonal needs, including servicing the increase in health-plan questions, leads and enrollment.

The seasonal positions range from full to part time, and the company noted that various regular full- and part-time roles are also available. Positions are immediate, and qualified applicants will start as soon as possible.

Lisa Schulze, vice president of human resources at Alta Resources, said, “We have core values that we call ‘Guiding Principles.’ We have seven of them. It’s difficult to attribute our growth to just one, but, if I had to, I’d say our Guiding Principle of Results is most fitting. We’re looking for people who, in embodying our Guiding Principles, are eager to learn, excel and deliver defined results for our leading client brands.”

Available opportunities include customer care; inbound sales, including licensed health-insurance sales; and team leadership. Alta Resources offers a variety of advantages to job seekers: flexible schedules completely tailored to individuals’ lifestyle, paid training, competitive pay, a team-based culture, skills development and advancement potential for high performers.

The company also pays for health-insurance sales licensing for qualified candidates; licensing will be for the specific state(s) a sales representative will service and is his/hers to retain for as long as the license is valid, meaning it can be reused in the future.

Steve Seidl, managing director of Alta Resources’ Brea location, added, “One of the biggest advantages of working here is our dynamic culture — a product of our people. Year after year, they spearhead our recurring appearance on the Orange County Register list of ‘Top Workplaces.’” In 2013, Alta Resources’ Brea campus ranked 13th in the “Midsized Companies” category and also received the Medallion Award for its work-life flexibility. The year 2013 was also the fifth-consecutive time that the company made the list of Orange County companies. The ranking is based on a third-party survey of nearly 60,000 employees across 1,000 area companies.

To fill the roles, the company is asking interested candidates to visit JoinAlta.com to search current openings, create a profile and apply. They can also get details pertaining to Alta Resources’ upcoming job events in the Brea area.

Schulze concluded, “Events like job fairs are unique opportunities for interested candidates to immediately and directly network with Alta Resources’ professionals. We have a number of events planned over the next few months at all our locations, and they’ll feature immediate interviews, a chance to learn more about Alta Resources and the available job openings, and so much more.”

About Alta Resources

Formed in 1995, privately held Alta Resources is a leading provider of customer management business process outsourcing (BPO) for many of the world’s best-known brands in a variety of industries, including consumer-packaged goods (CPG), health care and insurance, and entertainment. With its comprehensive service lines — care, sales, e-commerce, back office and fulfillment — working in tandem, clients can seamlessly integrate their core business processes through a single partner. In turn, Alta Resources helps clients improve and better manage their customer experiences across every touch point, online and offline, ultimately delivering results that provide sales growth and/or cost savings.

With headquarters, a main campus and a fulfillment facility in Neenah, Wisconsin, Alta Resources has additional operations in Michigan, California, Florida and the Philippines. To learn more, visit AltaResources.com. Reported by PRWeb 13 hours ago.

Plan to simplify 2015 health renewals may backfire

$
0
0
If you have health insurance on your job, you probably don't give much thought to each year's renewal. But make the same assumption in one of the new health law plans, and it could lead to costly surprises. Reported by Seattle Times 13 hours ago.

Talking points trump truth in message-driven Washington

$
0
0
Former congressional staffer Scott Lilly, now a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, testified at a hearing on Capitol Hill last week that lawmakers might be able to reach a bipartisan consensus on how to improve the congressional budget process if Washington were not ruled by public relations people and message mavens.

Lilly, who served as clerk and staff director of the House Appropriations Committee before moving to the liberal-leaning think tank, suggested to lawmakers, who are considering a move from an annual to a biennial budget, that the "biggest failing of the current process is that it has truly failed to inform our citizenry as to why the federal budget is growing at such a rapid pace."

In a commentary shortly after his testimony, Lilly added that, "The current Congressional budget process is too elaborate, too time consuming and worse off controlled by message makers instead of legislators." (Emphasis added.)

Lilly's words could have applied to every other issue members of Congress take up, especially health care. Had message-makers not been in control of the debate over health care reform from the get-go, our citizenry would not be so ill informed about "Obamacare." Even that word itself was coined by message-makers for no reason other than to persuade us to think a certain way about the Affordable Care Act and to vote against any politician who supported it.

Obama had not been in office more than four months when pre-eminent pollster and message-maker Frank Luntz sent Republican politicians and operatives a 28-page document entitled "The Language of Healthcare 2009: The 10 Rules for Stopping the 'Washington Takeover' of Healthcare."

This was not a policy paper. There was hardly a word about what Republicans should do to improve the U.S. health care system. It was a PR strategy for how Republicans could capitalize by using emotion-laden words and phrases to condemn anything the Democrats came up with. Keep in mind that congressional leaders and the White House were still in the process of exploring options for legislation at the time. Actual bills that Congress would ultimately vote for or against would not materialize for many months.

"This document is based on polling results and Instant Response dial sessions conducted in April 2009," Luntz wrote. "It captures not just what Americans want to see but exactly what they want to hear. The Words That Work boxes that follow are already being used by a few Congressional and Senatorial Republicans. From today forward they should be used by everyone."

And they were. Especially the phrases "Washington takeover" and its cousin "government takeover of health care." They were used repeatedly even though the legislation that was enacted was based in large part on Republican proposals from earlier years.

While message-makers have plied their trade for decades to influence public policy and to help candidates win elections, I can remember a time not so long ago when bipartisanship, civil debate and compromise were possible not only in Washington but also in the state capitals.

As a young reporter, I covered politics in Tennessee when Republican Winfield Dunn was governor and Democrats controlled both the state Senate and House of Representatives. Dunn, and later Republican Gov. and now Sen. Lamar Alexander, who also served while Democrats controlled both houses, had to reach across the political aisle to get any of their policy initiatives enacted. They both succeeded by doing exactly that.

Later I covered Congress and the White House when Jimmy Carter was president, Democrat Tip O'Neill was House Speaker and Republican Howard Baker of Tennessee was Senate Minority Leader. Baker, who died last month, was a true moderate and a master at brokering compromises and getting legislation enacted. He was proud to be called "The Great Conciliator."

Fast forward to today. Thanks to the rule of message makers, the term "moderate" and "compromise" have become descriptors Republican candidates seeking re-election fear most.

Alexander, who is running for a third term, bears little resemblance to the man who governed Tennessee in a bipartisan fashion and who was first elected to the Senate as a moderate in 2002.

Because he is facing a primary challenge from the right -- Sarah Palin just last week endorsed his opponent, state Rep. Joe Carr -- Alexander is trying to persuade Tennessee GOP voters that, despite allegations to the contrary, he's a dyed-in-the wool conservative.

Undoubtedly following the advice of message-makers, he of course is running against Obamacare -- and stooping to misinform the citizens of Tennessee about the law -- to burnish his conservative bona fides. The Washington Post's fact check column awarded him "two Pinocchios" earlier this month for misleading folks with his fuzzy math and suggesting that health insurance premiums have risen 50 percent since the law went into effect. The truth is that hundreds of thousands of his constituents now have health insurance they can afford, thanks in part to subsidies made available by "Obamacare," and that many of them couldn't buy coverage at any price prior to the law because of pre-existing conditions.

Politicians have misled voters for as long as there have been politicians. At times, though, and not so long ago, it was not a death wish to claim to be a moderate willing to work with members of the other party. That's hardly possible when message makers call the shots. Reported by Huffington Post 11 hours ago.

IRS releases draft ACA employer reporting form

$
0
0
The Internal Revenue Service released draft forms for employers to use to report employee health insurance information requir -More-  Reported by SmartBrief 11 hours ago.

What France Can Teach Us About ObamaCare

$
0
0
  In about a year and a half, the ObamaCare employer mandate kicks in. Firms with 50 or more employees will be required to provide expensive health insurance for their workers and their dependents or pay a fine of $2,000 per employee. What difference will that make?     Suppose an employer has 49 [...] Reported by Forbes.com 8 hours ago.

How Harry Reid Might End Up Saving Obamacare

$
0
0
How Harry Reid Might End Up Saving Obamacare Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid might have saved Obamacare by going "nuclear."

Last November, Reid pushed the button on the so-called "nuclear option," drastically changing Senate filibuster rules in order to get more of President Barack Obama's judicial and executive nominees approved. Reid's rule change allowed Obama's nominees to be approved in by a simple majority vote rather than with the support of 60% of senators, which prevented the Republican minority from blocking the president's picks.

And it turns out, Reid's maneuvering might become the White House's most effective weapon as it faces the most serious legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act in more than two years.

"It's the first big case where the effects of the nuclear option could be felt," one Senate Democratic aide told Business Insider last week.

Here's how Reid's senatorial nuke could theoretically save Obamacare. Last week, a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court ruled a 2012 IRS regulation that implements key subsidies under the law is invalid, in the case of Halbig v. Burwell. The decision has the potential to affect more than 5 million people who have been given tax credits when purchasing health insurance through the federal exchange.

But the Department of Justice is appealing the panel's decision, requesting an "en banc" review by the full D.C. Circuit Court. The math for the Obama administration is better in this situation — the court splits 7-4 in favor of Democratically appointed judges, due to Reid's rule change. Because of this breakdown, legal experts believe the D.C. court will reverse the Halbig decision if it grants the en banc review.

Reid's decision to go nuclear came after Obama mounted an unusual public campaign to get three of his judicial nominees appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. After months of threats, Reid responded to the president's push by instituting the rules change. Those three D.C. Circuit Court judges have since been confirmed — and they're the reason there's a Democratic majority on the court that would likely reverse the Halbig decision in the en banc review.

"Adding Democratically appointed judges who are less enamored of a literalist approach to statutory interpretation makes it much more likely that the court will take the case en banc," Nicholas Bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan and contributor to The Incidental Economist, told Business Insider, adding, "The nuclear option thus matters a great deal for the moment."

The D.C. Circuit Court, considered the second-most powerful court in the nation after the Supreme Court, is of particular importance to Obama's second-term agenda — and his legacy. The court has a vast jurisdiction over the federal government and thousands of regulations, rules, and executive actions from more than 400 administrative agencies. The Halbig case is viewed as the most significant case yet to potentially come before the new D.C. Circuit Court's split. 

In fact, some opponents of the president's signature healthcare law believe Reid's decision to go nuclear was specifically designed to protect Obamacare from legal challenges.

"There has been speculation they did that because of Halbig," Michael Cannon, the director of health policy at the Cato Institute and one of the key architects of the Halbig lawsuit, told Business Insider in an interview on Friday. 

"I have no basis for evaluating those claims and that speculation, other than to say that adhering to the law as written would prove such a threat to the law itself and the goals of Senate Democrats and the president. These lawsuits are probably reason enough for them to pull the trigger on the nuclear option."

The D.C. Circuit Court's decision in Halbig v. Burwell wasn't the only recent ruling in a legal challenge to Obamacare that could prove crucial to the law's future.

Last Tuesday, the same day Halbig was announced, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia came to the opposite conclusion and ruled the regulation allowing subsidies for people buying health insurance through federal exchanges was valid. These dueling rulings mean Reid's work to fill the D.C. Circuit with Democratic judges could prevent the challenges to the regulation on subsidies from reaching the Supreme Court, which is far less predictable and is divided 5-4 in favor of Republican appointees. 

If the full D.C. Circuit Court panel reverses the Halbig decision, it will be in agreement with the Fourth Circuit Court ruling. In this case, legal experts say, the Supreme Court would be much less likely to step into a situation where there is no dispute at the lower-level courts.

However, all of Reid's maneuvering doesn't guarantee the legal challenges to Obamacare won't make it to the Supreme Court. And, as Bagley put it, the rule changes "won't make a lick of difference" if the case goes to the higher court. 

Therein lies the caveat: If the case does reach the Supreme Court, all bets are off, since it will be up to an unpredictable court. But for now, Reid has made the odds of the law's survival in the federal-court system a little better.

Jonathan Adler, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio and another conservative legal scholar behind the Halbig challenge, acknowledged Reid and Obamacare supporters may think the nuclear option gave them a win. However, he also argued the ultimate outcome is still uncertain.  

"Sen. Reid certainly thinks the nuke option helps the government, and in a case this politically charged it might," Adler said. "I guess we'll see."

Join the conversation about this story » Reported by Business Insider 9 hours ago.

DC Circuit Decision Isn't Just About Obamacare Subsidies: It Also Kills the Employer Mandate

$
0
0
There are some real-life occurrences that are so absurd that the phrase "you can't make this stuff up" comes readily to mind. Yet the July 22 decision of a divided three-judge DC Federal Circuit Court panel invalidating the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) premium tax credits for anyone purchasing insurance on a Federal Exchange proves that you can "just make this stuff up." Which is what the two-judge majority did in Halbig v. Burwell.

This case, and the Fourth Circuit's opposite ruling in King v. Burwell, concerned the IRS rule which made Federal insurance premium subsidies in the form of tax credits available under the Federal Exchanges established by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The ACA provisions required HHS to set up such Exchanges for and in States that did not elect to do so, even though another section of the Act defining how subsidies would be calculated said that subsidies would flow through Exchanges 'established by the State.' Essentially, the DC judges decided the only possible interpretation of this apparent conflict was that the Federal Exchanges do not in fact stand in the shoes of the State Exchanges for subsidy purposes because they were not literally "established" by "the State." The Fourth Circuit held that the IRS was entitled to deference in resolving the ambiguity in the statute the other way, honoring the legal fiction that the Federal Exchanges are the equivalent of State Exchanges in order to allow such subsidies nationwide.

What these two Republican jurists on the DC Circuit invented was a version of the ACA that even their own political party never considered to be reality: namely, a statute that contains its own self-destruct poison pill that would invalidate the very provisions the GOP most detested: the employer mandate, the individual mandate, and the Federal subsidies. By these judges incredible reading of the entire statute, the ACA's only possible meaning was that:

(1) If all 50 States of the Union simply exercised their right not to establish an insurance Exchange, then no subsidies could be provided to low-and moderate-income individuals mandated to buy insurance. This means that they would likely be eligible for the exclusion from the individual mandate that applies when the premium for the cheapest policy available exceeds 8 percent of annual family income;

(2) Accordingly, employers with 50 or more employees that would ordinarily be subject to the mandate to provide health insurance meeting Federal standards or pay a significant penalty tax for each uncovered employee would likewise escape the mandate. The mandate is triggered if just one employee buys subsidized insurance on an Exchange -- an impossibility under the DC Circuit judges reading on the Act if the only Exchanges turned out to be the Federal version.

The majority on the DC panel made clear that such a broad reading was their intention by specifically observing that under the IRS rule in question "the individual and employer mandates" would have 'broader effect than they would have if credits were limited to State-established Exchanges' and that their decision to void the IRS rule would 'likely have significant consequences... for insurance markets more broadly' (see Halbig v. Burwell at pp. 8-9 and 41).

Likewise the GOP plaintiff seeking to overturn the IRS rule in King v. Burwell also expressly stated that denial of tax credits for individuals shopping on Federal Exchanges would 'throw a debilitating wrench' into the ACA's "internal economic machinery,'" resulting ultimately in an adverse-selection "death spiral" in States with Federally-run Exchanges (see King v. Burwell at p. 33).

But surely under this reading of the ACA, House Republicans would not have needed to conduct 40 votes to repeal in order to show their displeasure. Nor would they have had to try to shut down the entire Government as a ploy to force defunding the ACA. All they would have had to do to cut the heart out of ObamaCare would have been - and still would be -- to get 14 more States and DC to dismantle their Exchanges. Game over!

But the GOP never played that game, because they never once thought that was the game. Indeed, the apocalyptic vision of Obamacare's massive intrusion into the health care system and the economy as a whole, promulgated by the Republican Party consistently since the ACA's passage, is the best evidence that the DC Circuit majority opinion in Halbig v. Burwell indeed just made up its version of the Act out of whole cloth, as the dissent observed. If the entire Obamacare structure was subject to an automatic, self-enforcing veto by the States, it would mean that the ACA's mandates and subsidies would not be effective right now in 72 percent of the States and subject to the whim of State legislatures and governors in the other 28 percent at any time going forward.

Not only did the GOP -- the fiercest opponent of Obamacare -- never read the ACA the way the DC Circuit panel majority did, neither did the US insurance industry, their shareholders, nor HHS. Since the DC Circuit reading of the stature did not address or effect the various mandates the ACA imposes on insurers (like no lifetime caps, no pre-existing condition exclusions, no sexually-based premium differentials, etc.), the insurance industry would be stuck with those mandates without the compensating benefits of employer and individual mandates and Federal premium subsidies for their low-and-moderate-income customers.

Had the industry ever understood the statute in that way, their legion of lobbyists would have been up in arms. Harry and Louise of HillaryCare fame would have been back on every screen urging viewers to write to Congress to repeal this awful ACA burden on their friendly neighborhood insurance companies. But that obviously didn't happen. And likewise equity investors in insurance companies never read the ACA that way either, sending many health care insurers to all-time highs in the years since the passage of the ACA.

In the same vein, HHS could have saved itself all the bother of the botched launch of the Federal Exchange website and the huge political price paid by the President for that debacle. There would have been no need to launch it or fix it (and Kathleen Sebelius might still be Secretary of HHS), because under the DC Circuit panel decision, the Federal Exchanges contemplated by the ACA to stand in the place of State Exchanges if States elected not to set them up, would have had no power to sell subsidized insurance anyway. Why bother to create a Federal Exchange if it was essentially there only to serve those who could easily afford insurance on their own. Yet this is the version of ObamaCare the DC judges said was so patently clear there can be no other rational interpretation of the statute. Which means, I guess, that the entire Republican Party, the health insurance companies, their equity shareholders, HHS -- and even Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court who would have voided the ACA -- have been living in delusion for five years now.

As noted above, a unanimous panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that ruled on the same day as the DC Court that the Federal Exchange subsidies can stand because deference should be shown to the IRS's interpretation of statutory language subject to multiple possible interpretations in order to achieve the Act's central purposes, ruling that it is "clear that widely available tax credits are essential to fulfilling the Act's primary goals and that Congress was aware of this importance when drafting the bill." This Court noted that even the dissenters in the only Supreme Court decision on the ACA saw that without the Federal subsidies, individuals would lose the main incentive to purchase insurance. Some insurers may be unwilling to offer insurance inside of exchanges. With fewer buyers and even fewer sellers, the exchanges would not operate as Congress intended and may not operate at all (see King v. Burwell, above at p. 33). No mention there of the putative Congressionally-intended "State veto" the DC Circuit found that somehow eluded Justices Alito, Kennedy, Scalia and Thomas!

The two GOP judges on the DC Circuit have had their fun. Now it's time to call in the adults on the DC Circuit and reverse this grotesque re-imagination of the purposes, intent and even the very language of the ACA. Insurance companies of America -- call your lawyers, because you are the ultimate losers here as well. Thanks to their lobbyists, the chances of a Congressional fix of this ruling, if it stands, might not be so hopeless after all.

--

Terry Connelly is the Dean Emeritus at the Ageno School of Business of Golden Gate University

Terry Connelly is an economic expert and dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University in San Francisco. Terry holds a law degree from NYU School of Law and his professional history includes positions with Ernst & Young Australia, the Queensland University of Technology Graduate School of Business, New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, global chief of staff at Salomon Brothers investment banking firm and global head of investment banking at Cowen & Company. In conjunction with Golden Gate University President Dan Angel, Terry co-authored Riptide: The New Normal In Higher Education. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Personal Accident and Health Insurance in Germany, Key Trends and Opportunities to 2018

$
0
0
NEW YORK, July 28, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue: Personal Accident and Health Insurance in Germany, Key Trends and Opportunities to 2018... Reported by PR Newswire 7 hours ago.

The idea of pet parenthood means business for PetFirst

$
0
0
Is your pet your property? Or is it a member of the family? Most people will say the latter. And that shift in ideology has been a boon for companies in the pet industry. "(There is) this whole focus on 'pet parents,'" said A. Brent Hinton, co-founder and vice chairman of Jeffersonville-based PetFirst Healthcare LLC, a provider of pet health insurance products. People no longer identify themselves as pet owners so much as they embrace the idea of being "mommy" or "daddy" to their pets, according… Reported by bizjournals 7 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images