Quantcast
Channel: Health Insurance Headlines on One News Page [United States]
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live

Barack Obama: "Don't Get Cynical, Get Hopey"

$
0
0
Barack Obama: Don't Get Cynical, Get Hopey Today, Obama did more of what he has been born to do: preach from a teleprompter, this time at the Paramount Theater in Austin. Here are the choice excerpts from the speech transcript. They hardly need commentary:

* * *

Sometimes people say thank you for something I've done or a position I've taken, and some people say, "*You're an idiot." (Laughter.) And that's how I know that I'm getting a good representative sampling because -- (laughter) -- half the letters are less than impressed with me.*

* * *

The crisis in 2008 hurt us all badly -- worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. But you think about the progress we've made. Today, our businesses have added nearly 10 million new jobs over the past 52 months. (Applause.) Our housing is rebounding. Our auto industry is booming. Manufacturing is adding more jobs than any time since the 1990s. The unemployment rate is the lowest point it's been since September of 2008. (Applause.) ... *some of it had to do with decisions we made to build our economy on a new foundation. *And those decisions are paying off. We're more energy independent. For the first time in nearly 20 years, we produce more oil here at home than we buy from abroad. (Applause.) The world's largest oil and gas producer isn't Russia; it's not Saudi Arabia -- it's the United States of America. (Applause.)

In education, our high school graduation rate is at a record high; the Latino dropout rate has been cut in half since 2000. (Applause.) More young people are graduating from college than ever before.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Si se puede!

OBAMA: *Si se puede*. (Laughter.)

* * *

So when folks say they're frustrated with Congress, let's be clear about what the problem is. (Applause.) *I'm just telling the truth now. I don't have to run for office again, so I can just let her rip. *(Applause.) And I want to assure you, I'm really not that partisan of a guy. My favorite President is the first Republican President, a guy named Abraham Lincoln. You look at our history, and we had great Republican Presidents who -- like Teddy Roosevelt started the National Park System, and Dwight Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System, and Richard Nixon started the EPA.

The statement I'm making is not a partisan statement, it is a statement of fact. (Applause.) So far this year, Republicans in Congress have blocked or voted down every serious idea to strengthen the middle class. They have said no --

AUDIENCE: Booo!

OBAMA: Don't boo now, because what I want you to do is vote. (Applause.)

They've said no to raising the minimum wage. They've said no to fair pay. They said no to unemployment insurance for hardworking folks like Kinsey's parents who have paid taxes all their lives and never depended on anything and just needed a little help to get over a hump. They said no to fixing our broken immigration system that we know would strengthen our borders and our businesses and help families. (Applause.)

* * *

*And what it does, is it just feeds people's cynicism about Washington. It just makes people think, well, nothing can happen, and people start feeling hopeless. *And we have to understand, in the face of all evidence to the contrary in Washington, we can do better than we're doing right now. (Applause.) We can do better than what we're doing right now.

We know from our history, *our economy does not grow from the top down, it grows from the middle up. It grows from a rising, thriving middle class. *It grows when we got ladders of opportunity for everybody, and every young person in America is feeling hopeful and has a chance to do what they can with the God-given talents that they have. That's what we're fighting for. That is what you should be fighting for. (Applause.)

And that's the reason -- that's the reason why my administration has taken more than 40 different actions just this year to help working Americans -- because Congress won't.

* * *

As long as Congress will not increase wages for workers, I will go and talk to every business in America if I have to. (Applause.) There's no denying a simple truth: *America deserves a raise, *and *if you work full-time in this country*, you shouldn't live in poverty. That's something that we all believe. (Applause.)

* * * 

Now, here's where it gets interesting. There are a number of Republicans, including a number in the Texas delegation, who are mad at me for taking these actions. *They actually plan to sue me. *(Laughter.) Now, I don't know which things they find most offensive -- me helping to create jobs, or me raising wages, or me easing the student loan burdens, or me making sure women can find out whether they're getting paid the same as men for doing the same job. I don't know which of these actions really bug them. (Laughter.)

The truth is, even with all the actions I've taken this year, I'm issuing executive orders at the lowest rate in more than 100 years. So it's not clear how it is that Republicans didn't seem to mind when President Bush took more executive actions than I did. (Applause.) Maybe it's just me they don't like. I don't know. Maybe there's some principle out there that I haven't discerned, that I haven't figure out. (Laughter.) You hear some of them -- "sue him,""impeach him." Really? (Laughter.) Really? For what? (Applause.) *You're going to sue me for doing my job? Okay.* (Applause.)

*I mean, think about that. You're going to use taxpayer money to sue me for doing my job* -- (laughter) -- *while you don't do your job*. (Applause.)

* * *

So rather than wage another political stunt that wastes time, wastes taxpayers' money, I've got a better idea: Do something. (Applause.) If you're mad at me for helping people on my own, let's team up. Let's pass some bills. Let's help America together. (Applause.)

*It is lonely, me just doing stuff. *I'd love if the Republicans did stuff, too. (Laughter.) On immigration issues, we've got -- and to their credit, there are some Republicans in the Senate who actually worked with Democrats, passed a bill, would strengthen the borders, would help make the system more fair and more just. But the House Republicans, they haven't even called the bill. They won't even take a vote on the bill. They don't have enough energy or organization or I don't know what to just even vote no on the bill. (Laughter.) And then they're made at me for trying to do some things to make the immigration system work better. So it doesn't make sense.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)
 
OBAMA: I'm sorry, what are you yelling about now? Sit down, guys. I'm almost done. Come on, sit down. I'll talk to you afterwards, I promise. I'll bring you back. I'm wrapping things up here.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)
 
OBAMA: I understand. See, everybody is going to start -- I'm on your side, man. Sit down, guys, we'll talk about it later, I promise.

So, look, here's what we could do. We could do so much more -- *you don't have to escort them out. They'll sit down. I promise, I'll talk to you afterwards.*

* * *

Let's rally around a patriotism that says we're stronger as a nation when we cultivate the ingenuity and talent of every American, and give every 4-year-old in America access to high-quality education -- good-quality preschool. (Applause.) Let's redesign our high schools to make them more relevant to the 21st century economy. Let's make college more affordable. Let's make sure every worker, if you lose your job, you can get a good job training that gives you an even better job. (Applause.)

Let's embrace the patriotism that says it's a good thing when our fellow citizens have health care. It's not a bad thing. (Applause.) That's not a bad thing. It's a good thing when women earn what men do for the same work. That's an all-American principle. (Applause.) Everybody has got a mom out there or a wife out there or a daughter out there. They don't want them to not get treated fairly. Why would you be against that?

* * *

There are plenty of people who count on you getting cynical and count on you not getting involved so that you don't vote, so you give up. *And you can't give into that. America is making progress, despite what the cynics say*. (Applause.) Despite unyielding opposition and a Congress that can't seem to do anything, there are workers with jobs who didn't have them before; there are families with health insurance who didn't have them before; there are students in college who couldn't afford it before; there are troops who served tour after tour who are home with their families today. (Applause.)

*Cynicism is popular. *Cynicism is popular these days. It's what passes off as wisdom. But cynics didn't put a man on the moon. Cynics never won a war. Cynics didn't cure a disease, or start a business, or feed a young mind. *Cynicism didn't bring about the right for women to vote, or the right for African Americans to be full citizens*. *Cynicism is a choice.*
 
*Hope is a better choice. *Hope is what gave young soldiers the courage to storm a beach. Hope is what gave young people the strength to march for women's rights and civil rights and voting rights and gay rights and immigrant rights. (Applause.)
 
Hope is what compelled Kinsey to sit down and pick up a pen, and ask "what can I do," and actually think maybe the President might read that story and it might make a difference. (Applause.) And her voice rang out here in the Paramount Theatre. And it's her voice and your voice that's going to change this country. *That's how we're going to make sure that we remain the greatest nation on Earth -- not by asking what we can do for ourselves, but what we can do for each other and what we can do for our country.*

And so, as President, I'm going to keep a promise that I made when I first ran: Every day,* I will keep asking the same question, and that is, how can I help you? *And I'll keep treating your cares and your concerns as my own. *And I will keep fighting to restore the American Dream for everybody who's willing to work for it.*

And I am going to need you to be right there with me. (Applause.) *Do not get cynical. Hope is the better choice.*

Thank you, Texas. Thank you, Austin. God bless you. (Applause.) 

END

* * *

Or, all the above, summarized in one sentence: *it's the Republicans fault, and ban cynicism.* (with a gratuitous JFK paraphrase thrown in for good measure)

Full transcript word cloud: Reported by Zero Hedge 23 hours ago.

Richmond company helps navigate health insurance questions

$
0
0
RICHMOND, VA (WWBT) - A Richmond company helps save the newly insured time, money Reported by CapitalBay 16 hours ago.

John Boehner's Lawsuit Hits Obama On Health Care Law Changes

$
0
0
WASHINGTON -- House Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) lawsuit against President Barack Obama will focus on the administration's unilateral changes to the health care law's employer mandate, according to a draft resolution released on Thursday.

The resolution, which Boehner is likely to bring to the House floor this month, would authorize the House General Counsel to initiate litigation against Obama and "compel" the president to enforce the law. In a statement, the speaker said Obama had violated the Constitution last year by delaying the employer mandate under the Affordable Care Act.

"In 2013, the president changed the health care law without a vote of Congress, effectively creating his own law by literally waiving the employer mandate and the penalties for failing to comply with it," Boehner said.

The Obama administration announced last year that the government would not penalize businesses that failed to provide health insurance in 2014, thus delaying the law's so-called employer mandate until 2015. The White House also postponed the start date for some mid-sized businesses.

Administration officials said the decision to delay the provision was made after considering a flood of complaints from business owners, who asked for additional time to meet the health care law's requirements. The officials were unable to pinpoint when the decision was made, or whether it was ultimately decided by the White House or the Treasury Department.

House Republicans voted to delay the employer mandate themselves following the administration's announcement last year, arguing that they did not believe the president had the authority to delay its implementation on his own.

Obama and Democrats have dismissed the lawsuit as a political stunt by Republicans to shore up support among their base going into November's midterm elections. Defenders of the president have also pointed out that his predecessors have signed far more executive orders.

Boehner insisted on Thursday that the lawsuit was appropriate.

"The current president believes he has the power to make his own laws -– at times even boasting about it," Boehner said. "That’s not the way our system of government was designed to work. No president should have the power to make laws on his or her own."

*Read the draft resolution below:*Bills-113pih-Hres Reported by Huffington Post 23 hours ago.

Moms Who Want Healthier Kids Might Want To Go Back To School

$
0
0
New research says children of mothers who went to college tend to be better educated, healthier and wealthier than children of mothers who did not finish high school.

The study, out this month from the Foundation for Child Development, analyzes the difference in life outcomes for the 12 percent of children in America with mothers who haven't graduated high school, compared to the 33 percent of children whose mothers holds a bachelor's degree. Based on the research, children whose mothers went to school for longer fared much better.

Using data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the study looked at information in four big categories: family economic resources, reading and mathematics proficiency, school enrollment and completion and health.

Below, we've broken down some of the results:

*1. Family Economic Resources*
Median Family Income For Children Of Mothers Who... | Create Infographics*2. Reading and Mathematics Proficiency*% Of 8th Graders Reading Proficiently, Based On Their Mothers Education Level | Create Infographics

· *ALSO: Sixteen percent of children whose mothers did not complete high school were deemed proficient at math in eighth grade. On the other hand, 52 percent of children whose mothers graduated college were proficient in math at the same age. *
*3. School Enrollment and Completion*% Of Kids Who Did NOT Graduate High School On Time, Based On Their Mothers Education Level | Create Infographics

· *ALSO: Thirty-seven percent of children whose mothers had not graduated high school were enrolled in a preschool at ages 3 or 4. Sixty-four percent of children whose mothers went to college were enrolled in preschool at the same age.*
*4. Health*% Of Kids Considered Obese, Based On Their Mothers Education Level | Create Infographics

· *ALSO: Sixteen percent of children whose mothers did not graduate high school were not covered by health insurance. Four percent of children whose mothers graduated college were not covered by health insurance.* Reported by Huffington Post 23 hours ago.

Uninsured rate plummets under Obamacare

$
0
0
The number of Americans lacking health insurance has plummeted this year, a trio of surveys released Thursday found. Reported by CNNMoney 23 hours ago.

Californians lacking health insurance halved under Obamacare: study

$
0
0
SACRAMENTO Calif. (Reuters) - The number of Californians without health insurance has been cut in half since the implementation of Obamacare, according to a survey published Thursday. Reported by Reuters 22 hours ago.

The Right Way To Subsidize Health Insurance

$
0
0
Although most of us think our health care system is predominantly a private system, government is heavily involved. Close to one in every two health care dollars is spent by government. And even spending that counts as private is heavily subsidized. Reported by Forbes.com 22 hours ago.

More signs of health coverage growth

$
0
0
Millions of Americans have gained health insurance since Obamacare went into effect. Reported by Politico 20 hours ago.

Dear President Obama: Secure The Border Now Or Risk Civil War

$
0
0
As any grade-schooler, let alone a graduate of Harvard Law School, knows, the first job of a US President is to protect the homeland. Nothing comes before that sacred duty. Not famine abroad, not health insurance at home, not even Lilly Ledbetter. The President exercises this primary function as the Commander-in-Chief. And the most elemental expression of the Commander-in-Chief role is border security.

President Barack Obama has made a running joke of this mandate. After busying himself playing pool and drinking beer with the Governor of Colorado on Tuesday (to the shocked dismay of at least one Texas Democrat), on Wednesday the President had the chutzpah to proclaim that he will not forthrightly halt the flow of undocumented immigrants into this Recession-racked country until Republicans sign off on amnesty for the millions of undocumented immigrants already here.

With that cowardly, cynical statement, it is now sadly clear to this columnist that Mr. Obama -- whose progressive stances on environmental protection, gay marriage, and ending the war in Iraq I fulsomely backed -- has zero interest in fully protecting our borders. He and the Democratic Party have too much to gain demographically -- and, thus, politically -- by minting newly indebted voters through making the US a magnet for illegal immigration. It's Chicago Machine patronage on a grand and twisted scale.

The facts speak for themselves. Of the reported 240,000 migrants -- 52,000 of them children -- that have arrived illegally in the last several months (with 300,000 more currently on their way), a Senate hearing yesterday confirmed that only 10% were actually sent back to their host countries. If you are sitting in Central America and calculating your chances of gaining a relatively comfy new life in America -- on Uncle Sam's dime -- those are pretty good odds.

It gets worse.

Only 10% of unaccompanied minors required by law to show up for immigration status hearings actually showed up, a U.S. Immigration and Customs official testified Wednesday. And only 46% of undocumented immigrant children accompanied by an adult actually showed up for status hearings.

For these children and their families a notice to appear is a "notice to disappear" into the shadows, never to be heard from again. The reason is simple. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which is responsible for placing undocumented children in safe environs as they await status hearings, routinely places such children in the homes of parents and guardians who themselves are here illegally.

What do you think are the chances of an undocumented parent or guardian bringing their undocumented child to a status hearing? Not very good. Yet, such illegal-immigration-encouraging placements are precisely what the Obama administration continues to do with the tens of thousands of children pouring over our border right now.

News travels fast in undocumented circles. No doubt, the undocumented parents and guardians of undocumented children already here have spread the word throughout the Americas that if you get here, you are in. And 90% of the time they are right.

Only now, at this late hour, is the President contemplating a paltry expenditure -- about $5 million -- to spread the word via some ill-fated public information campaign that Central American parents should not send their children to the US border. He can't be serious. If we had a $1 billion information campaign across every bus shelter and billboard in Guatemala City, San Salvador, and Tegucigalpa, nothing appreciable would change. Why? Because such public information would not match up with US border policy.

You see, as the undocumented immigrants pouring into our country well know, the pitcher is leaking out the bottom, but the President continues to let a flood of water back in. His pathetic HHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) flunkies that appeared before a Senate inquiry on Wednesday confirmed as much. As I listened on CSPAN radio, an infuriating Mark H. Greenberg, acting assistant secretary at HHS, finally had to admit that it was a deliberate administration policy not to ask the immigration status of parents with whom they were placing undocumented children. Are you kidding me? If the President was dead serious about stopping illegal immigration, and if all departments of government were, in turn, working in consort to solve this epidemic, immigration status would be the first thing that HHS checked. No wonder undocumented children don't show up for deportation hearings. Their undocumented parents and guardians don't want to be busted themselves!

The President is out of excuses. For two years after he entered office in 2009, Mr. Obama enjoyed Democratic control of both houses of Congress. At that juncture -- a time when fiscal stimulus was universally called for -- he could have appropriated enough money and manpower to almost completely end illegal immigration across our borders. He trumpeted then and has trumpeted ever since the percentage increases he made in personnel, equipment, deportations and so on over the previous administration. However, most Americans are not seeking a percentage breakdown or incremental improvements. We want a complete moratorium on illegal immigration. Then, and only then, will we consider what to do with the law-breakers already here.

However, the President was never interested in stopping illegal immigration. Democrats knew that they could solidify their electoral gains in swing states like New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado (and soon Texas) by talking a good game, but, in fact, doing nothing. If the President were genuinely interested in solving the problem, he would have implemented an all-hands-on-deck approach to border enforcement six years ago. Instead, he played the blame game. He's at it still.

And yet the thing is, even at this late hour -- as the border crisis metastasizes, as armed citizen militias talk openly about taking border control into their own hands, as socially liberal, eco-friendly types like me fume over the deliberate delays and rhetorical obfuscation from this administration -- President Obama still has one last chance, a tiny and short window before all hell breaks loose, to deal with the elephant in the living room of his weak-kneed tenure.

The final hour wake-up call would start with a no-strings-attached supplemental spending bill that would fund thousands more border control agents, including much-needed researchers, lawyers, and judges to detect the high-level of political asylum fraud -- which is upwards of 70%, according to yesterday's Senate testimony -- plus sizable medical personnel to screen, and, if necessary, quarantine the many undocumented transporting diseases against which this country has scant protection. This bill would also modify the ill-conceived William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 so the US could immediately deport any undocumented person from any part of the world in as little as one day. The supplemental spending bill would fund expanded detention facilities and courtrooms right on the border (not far afield, where undocumented immigrants can easily escape detection) plus funding for planes to send undocumented immigrants back to their home countries, often on the very day they arrive. Believe me, once those planes started landing en masse throughout Central America, the locals would get the message: No Vuelvas.

Moreover, such a bill would save the President's bacon on the economic front. After all, this President has routinely asked U.S. employers to hire returning war veterans. I have done so. And I know many other American entrepreneurs have done so as well.

However, for those thousands of vets unable to find work in the private sector, there could be job openings right now as border patrol agents for which their armed service on the borders in Iraq and Afghanistan makes them eminently qualified. Just say the word, Mr. President.

But the shamefully AWOL Mr. Obama would rather shoot pool, drink beer, play golf, and attend fundraisers than deal directly with the greatest domestic crisis of his Presidency. What kind of lawyer leaves the prima facie investigation of a catastrophe to his underlings? Yet, that is precisely what the President has done.

He's sent his feckless Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson to the border six times. By the way, this is the same Jeh Johnson -- the Michael "Heckuva Job" Brown of this administration -- whose repeated failure to directly answer questions about the administration's intentions in this area on last Sunday's Meet the Press (read the transcript) was an even greater abomination than Susan Rice's ill-fated trip to that same table.

Naturally, not once has President Obama gone to the border himself. He said on Wednesday that this is because he doesn't want to turn the crisis into "theater."

Say, what?

Obama's AWOL status during this defining crisis is worse than George W. Bush's atrocious performance during Hurricane Katrina. After all, Bush at least visited Louisiana and Mississippi. Might this President find -- if he deigned to visit our southern flank -- facts on the ground that would empirically contradict his open border narrative? Yes.

In particular, he might learn from real live border agents in the field (not carefully chosen agents prepped by the President's advance team) -- what formerly confidential surveys revealed in yesterday's Senate hearings confirmed -- that most of those children and families currently descending on the border did so because they got a clear signal from our President that they would find safe harbor once here.

Obama's open border apologists counter that the "innocent" women and children currently descending on our border are escaping poverty and violence. That they have no other choice but to run a dangerous gauntlet for Texas, New Mexico or Arizona. However, poverty and violence in Mexico and Central America have gone on for decades. What has appreciably changed over the last two years is DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals).

However, the President doesn't want to hear that. The President does not want to see his role in this mess. This is why President Obama -- who is clearly the guilty party in this humanitarian disaster -- continues to spin it as a problem of Republican politics.

However, as made clear by the massive increase of undocumented immigrants from Mexico and Central America since the President's DACA executive order -- passed June 15, 2012, conveniently a day after Flag Day (and my 53rd birthday) -- this is clearly a problem of Presidential policy.

Now think for a moment if the President expanded DACA to what he has deceptively dubbed "immigration reform." Instead of doing the sensible thing and first completely shutting down the border to illegal immigration -- and verifying that shutdown from independent and objective sources -- the President's plan would grant amnesty to anyone already here, just as we were finally trying to clamp down on illegal immigration in earnest. The resulting stampede for all U.S. border points from all corners of the planet would net millions crying for political asylum and amnesty, plus other health and human service protections, within months.

My friends, you are seeing in miniature on our borders right now what would happen writ large once the world gets a whiff that amnesty might become policy in Washington, DC. No matter how quickly the law got funded, we would not be able to staff up quickly enough to effectively stop the bum rush. Our borders would be overwhelmed almost overnight. And, believe me, the law-abiding citizens in border areas -- whose land, cattle, property and families would be violently threatened like never before -- would not stand idly by. They would fight back. And you could have tens of thousands of dead and wounded undocumented immigrants on our country's southern flank.

Is that what you want, Mr. President? An all-out border war? With National Guardsmen arresting and fighting our own countrymen, instead of protecting us from the undocumented invasion? You are already signaling that is your priority by sending National Guard personnel to stop the protests in Murrieta, California, instead of using those guardsmen to stop the flow of undocumented immigrants that are giving the good citizens of Murrieta such justifiable angst.

We need ten thousand more border control agents to completely and permanently stem the tide of smugglers, thieves, killers, human traffickers, rapists, would-be terrorists, and, yes, undocumented women and children pouring across our southern border. In other words, a jobs program that both parties and most sensible Americans could get behind. But, as with Syria, ISIS, and a host of other ills, this passive President is again many years late and several billion dollars short.

Instead of stoking this powder keg, which is bringing long-simmering and well-armed Nativist elements out of the shadows, our apologetic President should, instead, fly his entourage to the US border forthwith and deliver a real Berlin moment. And not the populist pabulum he served up to his Euro acolytes during the 2010 campaign. He should say candidly to the people of Mexico, Central America and South America that: A. Under no circumstances will you be given political asylum in America (Lady Liberty has already fallen for that gambit one too many times); B. You will not be reunited with your families; C. You will not be given work visas or citizenship; and D. You need to stay home and work to make your own countries better. Period.

Moreover, he needs to send a clear, full-throated, and unequivocal message to the governments of Latin America that, unless you proactively police your borders, reform your politics and law enforcement, and stem the tide of women and children flowing towards our border, you will be punished with sanctions, trade restrictions, and worse.

Obama could do it. He should do it. However, he is not courageous enough to do it.

Instead, he lets the border crisis fester because it serves him politically to do so.

Friends, we are not cold-hearted bigots because we, like every civilized nation on earth, put reasonable limits on who can and who cannot enter our country at any one time. We are not cruel and insensitive because we expect neighboring Mexico to use its sizable energy and mineral wealth to help its own people, enforce its own borders, and to stop cynically profiting from the repatriated income of undocumented immigrants without having to pay for their health care, education, driving privileges, housing, Food Stamps, and sundry other needs.

President Obama, violence is poised to break out during this heated summer from ranchers, farmers, and ordinary citizens who are sick and tired of having their lands trampled on, and their communities overwhelmed, by drug smugglers, human traffickers, rapists, killers, and all manner of other undocumented immigrant.

Sir, do you want the next American Civil War on your watch?

Then do what both Democrats and Republicans are pleading for you to do and get thee to the border now. Moreover, once there, announce that you are going to support a $30 billion emergency-spending bill -- with no strings attached -- that totally secures this nation's border for decades to come.

You will find that once you genuinely secure our border -- with 10,000 new border patrol agents, including 1000 National Guardsmen in the interim, and all manner of high-tech surveillance tools -- that you will get your amnesty program within a year. And not just for Dreamers, but for all 18-20 million undocumented immigrants (the 11 million figure is tossed out by open border apologists to make amnesty easier to swallow) here in this country right now.

The fabric of this fragile Republic, the fate of tens of thousands of children who are victims of your misguided actions (one-third of the young girls traveling to our border have been raped and/or abused en route) -- as well as your Presidential legacy -- depends on your actions over the next few days. Please do the right thing and completely secure our borders now.

--*@CROTTY* Reported by Huffington Post 22 hours ago.

House GOP’s lawsuit against Obama will focus on Affordable Care Act

$
0
0
By Richard Cowan and David Lawder WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. House of Representatives Republicans said on Thursday they intend to make President Barack Obama’s changes to his signature health insurance law the focus of a forthcoming lawsuit accusing him of overstepping his legal authorities. The House Rules Committee made public a “discussion draft” of legislation to authorize legal action against the president for misusing executive orders and other unilateral actions to advance his agenda. House […] Reported by Raw Story 21 hours ago.

PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company Files Suit to Overturn "Egregious, Overreaching" Action by Insurance Commissioner

$
0
0
SANTA ANA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company (PacifiCare) today sued California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, seeking to overturn an egregious, overreaching action against the company stemming from a series of long-resolved administrative errors. The lawsuit filed by PacifiCare in Orange County Superior Court seeks judicial review of a multiyear action by the California Department of Insurance (CDI), and of the Commissioner’s decision to impose a fine of Reported by Business Wire 22 hours ago.

Boehner: I'm Suing Obama Over ObamaCare

$
0
0
Boehner: I'm Suing Obama Over ObamaCare John Boehner is pressing ahead with his plan to sue President Obama —and he says he has now chosen a line of attack. The House speaker says the suit will focus on the president's decision to delay imposing penalties on firms that don't offer health insurance to employees, a change... Reported by Newser 14 hours ago.

Coverys Marketing Department Hires Territory Manager for NJ, PA, MD, DE, D.C.

$
0
0
Rebecca Stevenson will manage the Mid-Atlantic territory.

Boston, MA (PRWEB) July 11, 2014

Coverys, a leading provider of medical professional liability insurance, is pleased to announce that Rebecca Stevenson has joined the marketing department as a territory manager for New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and the District of Columbia, effective July 2, 2014. Stevenson will be responsible for managing the distribution network and new business development for the Mid-Atlantic territory.

Coverys member companies insure more than 25,000 physicians and allied medical professionals and nearly 500 facilities throughout the country. It is known for its conservative and committed expansion into new regions and has never left a state where it has written business. The company offers coverage for physicians, surgeons, hospitals, facilities, allied healthcare professionals and other healthcare providers.

“Rebecca brings considerable knowledge of the independent agency system, industry experience and skills developing new opportunities and leadership,” said Michael R. Kubik, senior vice president of marketing for Coverys. “Her experience in the industry will make a valuable contribution to the Coverys marketing team.”

Stevenson brings over eight years of experience in the medical professional liability insurance marketplace. Prior to joining Coverys, Stevenson was a marketing manager for ProAssurance where she was responsible for retention, new business growth, agent education and developing marketing strategies. Earlier in her career, she worked for two agencies and had various responsibilities including sales, developing and forecasting modeling programs, prospecting and business development.

Stevenson obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree from Longwood University in Farmville, Virginia and a Master of Science degree in Predictive Analytics from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. She is a licensed Property & Casualty and Life and Health Insurance producer and has earned the Certified Insurance Counselor, Certified Risk Manager and Certified Insurance Service Representative designations.

For more information about Coverys, contact Loren LeVasseur, public relations specialist, at (617) 946-8665 or llevasseur(at)coverys(dot)com.

About Coverys
Coverys is the eighth largest medical professional liability insurance provider in the country based on direct written premium. Coverys member companies insure more than 25,000 physicians, dentists, and allied healthcare providers, as well as more than 500 hospitals, health centers and clinics in 27 states from coast to coast. Coverys has net admitted assets of $3.4 billion and direct written premium of $363 million as of December 31, 2013. In addition, Coverys member insurance companies Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company (“ProMutual”) and ProSelect Insurance Company, as well as ProMutual-sponsored Coverys RRG, Inc. have a Best’s Rating of A (Excellent). MHA Insurance Company and Washington Casualty Company have a Best’s Rating of A- (Excellent), while OHA Insurance Solutions, Inc. is not rated at this time.

Coverys emphasizes physician education and patient safety, and the company is acknowledged as a leader in providing supportive risk management services and resolute claim defense to the healthcare community. For more information visit Coverys at http://www.coverys.com.

### Reported by PRWeb 14 hours ago.

Rate Of Uninsured Drops Under Affordable Care Act

$
0
0
Several surveys shows many people have followed the requirement to buy health insurance, but many other people still have not. A mandate under the Affordable Reported by CapitalBay 13 hours ago.

United States: Supreme Court Allows Closely Held Corporations To Invoke Religious Objections Against Providing Employee Contraceptive Coverage - Foley Hoag LLP

$
0
0
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations may invoke religious objections to exclude contraceptive coverage from employees' health insurance. Reported by Mondaq 12 hours ago.

Conservative Anti-Obamacare Ads May Have Backfired Spectacularly

$
0
0
Conservative Anti-Obamacare Ads May Have Backfired Spectacularly The millions of dollars spent on negative advertisements on the Affordable Care Act may have actually led to increased overall enrollment, according to a new study from the Brookings Institute.

According to May research from Kantar Media, anti-Obamacare groups have outspent their opponents by a 15-to-1 margin on the airwaves since the law was passed four years ago — out of almost $450 million in total spent on ads.

But Brookings fellow Niam Yaraghi looked at the trend and found "positive association between the anti-ACA spending and ACA enrollment." This was especially true in blue states, some of which feature the most competitive Senate races in the midterm elections. Yaraghi found that in states where Democrats are running for re-election, ad spending against the law correlated with higher enrollment.

"Although the volume of spending on anti-ACA ads is driven by the competitiveness of the Senate midterm elections and may be effective in reducing the votes for the targeted political figure, they may not necessarily reduce the popularity of the ACA," Yaraghi wrote.

The study doesn't take into account other potential factors for increased enrollment. In Kentucky, for example, the "Obamacare" exchange was marketed as "Kynect," and the state has been praised for how it ran its state exchange. 

Another potential factor Yaraghi observed: In states where more anti-Obamacare ads aired, more people believed Congress was likely to repeal the Affordable Care Act in the near future. This may have encouraged more people to take advantage of what they consider a limited-time opportunity. 

"People who believe that subsidized health insurance may soon disappear could have a greater willingness to take advantage of this one time opportunity," Yaraghi wrote.

Here's a scatter plot of Yaraghi's findings:

This post has been updated.*SEE ALSO: Major New Study Says Obamacare Is Working — Even For Republicans*

Join the conversation about this story » Reported by Business Insider 8 hours ago.

Clinicate Launches Clinical Communication App for Healthcare

$
0
0
Platform allows healthcare providers and patients to share clinical files, images, and videos.

New Orleans, LA (PRWEB) July 11, 2014

Clinicate, a new clinical file-sharing platform designed to promote clinical education and awareness, launches today in New York City at a major health technology conference. Clinicians can securely share knowledge and medical instructions through the Clinicate web and mobile applications. Any file, image, or video can now be uploaded, shared, received, and forwarded to healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers. The platform will debut today at The Open Forum 2014, an annual event for ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists and other providers focused on exploring new technologies and their immediate clinical applications.

Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), health information must be carefully safeguarded to insure the confidentiality and integrity of patient information. Clinicate is designed to offer tools that help healthcare providers communicate care instructions and other helpful clinical information in a secure and compliant manner within this complex regulatory environment.

“Being able to communicate efficiently with my colleagues and patients is essential to my practice” says Dr. Ray Weiss, ENT surgeon and co-founder of FIERO and The Open Forum. “Clinicate allows me to easily do this using my iPad® and in full HIPAA compliance.”

Based within the New Orleans BioInnovation Center incubator, Clinicate was founded by healthcare industry experts and consultants who aim to advance clinical communication. The digital health platform is available for immediate use on the web and on iOS and Android mobile devices. Interested users can sign up for free access today by going to http://www.clinicate.com.

About Clinicate

Clinicate is a leading provider of secure file-sharing technologies created specifically for the Healthcare industry. The platform gives healthcare providers and patients a unique and easy way to access and share information related to medical and pharmaceutical products, medical instructions, and treatments. Clinicate’s digital health applications are designed to promote clinical education and awareness, with the common goal of improving patient care and clinical outcomes. To learn more, please go to http://www.clinicate.com.

About FIERO and The Open Forum

The Foundation for Innovation, Education, & Research in Otolaryngology (FIERO) is an independent, academically focused, non-profit organization committed to being the crossroads of research, innovation, and patient care. Their goal is to bring together physician efforts from all sectors of Otolaryngology with frontline research and vibrant professional interactions. The Open Forum is FIERO’s annual conference that brings together colleagues interested in practical knowledge, focused educational activities, networking, and interactive education. The Open Forum stands apart as the leader of Otolaryngologic education grounded in the exploration of new technologies and their immediate application.

About the New Orleans BioInnovation Center

The New Orleans BioInnovation Center is a not-for-profit technology business incubator focused on fostering entrepreneurship and supporting bioscience innovation in Southeast Louisiana. The facility offers wet-labs, offices, shared research equipment, and conference facilities to a broad range of companies, from early-stage startups to maturing and expanding businesses. The Center also provides educational programming, an innovative loan program, and free technical assistance to emerging growth companies as they develop and bring new technologies to market. These include diagnostic tools, drugs, medical devices, digital health platforms, and clean technologies that hold great promise for addressing a wide range of medical and environmental problems.

(iPad is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.) Reported by PRWeb 8 hours ago.

Hobby Lobby Wants To Control Which Bathroom A Transgender Woman Can Use, Too

$
0
0
/>

Meggan Sommerville
In the days after the Supreme Court handed Hobby Lobby a sweeping victory in its fight to not provide employee health insurance that covers certain kinds of birth control, many customers came into the store in Aurora, Illinois, where Meggan Sommerville works, and offered their congratulations.

Hobby Lobby is a chain of craft stores whose founder says he tries to run the company in accordance with his Christian principles. Sommerville has worked there for 16 years. She loves her job and the store, which she said pays a good wage and carries supplies that she’s used for many of her own crafting projects.

Still, the congratulations from customers were hard to swallow. "I'd smile and nod and say, 'Yes, it's a victory for the company,' and then I'd push my real feelings down and not think about it anymore."

Sommerville is a transgender woman, and back in 2011, she filed a complaint against Hobby Lobby with the Illinois Department of Human Rights after the company refused to allow her to use the women's bathroom either as a customer or an employee.

She was never given an explanation. But Sommerville said she sees a connection with Hobby Lobby's argument that Christian principles should excuse it from covering some contraceptives.

"I don't believe that any company has the right to deny access to appropriate medical care, same as the reason why I don't believe that they have the right to deny me access to the washroom," she said in a recent phone call with The Huffington Post. "No company has the right to dictate what is decided between me and my doctor."

Sommerville transitioned to living as a woman in 2010. For the most part, colleagues and management were supportive, trying their best to use her new name and the right pronoun. That summer, she formally changed her name in court and received a new Social Security card and driver's license. A month later, Hobby Lobby provided her with a new name tag that finally matched how she saw herself.

But management refused to budge on one issue: They insisted that Sommerville continue to use the men's restroom. According to Sommerville, she was told she would only be allowed to use the women's restroom if she provided proof that she had undergone genital reconstructive surgery. Neither the state of Illinois nor the federal government require this surgery for a person to legally change his or her gender.

"I was devastated," Sommerville said. "I just want to be treated like all the other women. To do anything else diminishes who I am in the eyes of customers and employees."

Going to the bathroom became an embarrassing ordeal, where she was constantly worried about outing herself to customers or colleagues who didn't know her history. "There have been a few times when a customer has come in and I have essentially been trapped in the stall while I wait for the person to leave," she said. "The stories of trans women that have come under attack are always on my mind when I am forced to use the men's room. At the very least, I don't want to make a scene."

Sommerville's human rights complaint alleges that the company discriminated against her and "subjected her to unequal terms and conditions due to her gender identity." Through a representative, Hobby Lobby declined to comment on her case, which is still awaiting a ruling from the Illinois Human Rights Commission.

Hobby Lobby has not argued that religious principles influenced its refusal to allow Sommerville to use the women's bathroom. But her lawyer, Jacob Meister, pointed to a recent Salon.com article on how Hobby Lobby, its executives and affiliated companies are pouring millions of dollars into organizations and causes that seek to advance conservative Christian values and oppose lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights.

"I think the facts speak for themselves. Hobby Lobby has very actively sought to impose what it believes the law should be wherever possible, and it has thrown a lot of money behind these efforts," Meister said.

"I have absolutely no possible explanation for why they would so flagrantly ignore what's very clear in Illinois law," Meister continued. "Meggan is a female, she's been full-time for many years, and they will not allow her to use the women's restroom, which is something that is afforded to every female employee that they have except for Meggan, every female customer they have except for transgender folk."

In the weeks since the Supreme Court's June 30 ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, LGBT advocates and legal experts have picked over Justice Samuel Alito Jr.'s majority opinion, trying to gauge whether it gives corporations or institutions with religious affiliations carte blanche to discriminate against LGBT individuals.

Ilona Turner, legal director at the Transgender Law Center, said she thinks that it does not. Still, she said, "I could imagine that employers will attempt nonetheless to try to push the boundaries of that decision, to argue that their religious values give them a right to discriminate."

Sommerville's issue is one of the most common faced by transgender people in the workplace, Turner said. While religion is not often mentioned explicitly in connection with lawsuits arising from similar scenarios, it is often "in the background," she said.

Last year, California passed a law allowing transgender students to use facilities and participate in programs in accordance with their gender identity. That has fueled fears among conservative Christian groups that the rest of the states would soon follow.

After Phoenix, Arizona, passed a similar law in February 2013, Joseph LaRue, a lawyer with the Alliance Defending Freedom, a national Christian legal organization, wrote a blog post calling the measure "appalling" and arguing that it "provided voyeurs and other sexual predators easy access to the places where children and women are most vulnerable." According to Salon, the Alliance Defending Freedom is one of the groups heavily funded by Hobby Lobby profits.

Sommerville, a Christian herself, hopes that her human rights complaint may help change the culture at Hobby Lobby, at least on this particular issue. "I think any time somebody stands up for their rights to be respected, to be treated equally, it can make a change." Reported by Huffington Post 8 hours ago.

How to End Stress and Save Your Company Over $400k with Massage Envy Spa's Corporate Wellness Program

$
0
0
Studies have shown that approximately 40 percent of turnover in the workplace is stress related.

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) July 11, 2014

Stress in the workplace is a serious issue and negatively affects employees’ health, which causes a decrease in productivity and ultimately can affect the company’s bottom line. Massage Envy Spa®, a pioneer and national leader in professional, convenient and affordable massage and facial services, has designed a Corporate Wellness Program to help alleviate stress among employees and reduce company health costs.

Studies have shown that approximately 40 percent of turnover in the workplace is stress related, and can account for an estimated annual loss of $147,720. In addition, 50 percent of absenteeism and pre-absenteeism cases are related to stress, accounting for an annual loss of $40,500 and $162,000 per company respectively. These are significant percentages for companies of any size, especially for a small to medium size business. Losing multiple employees over a period of time can have a detrimental effect on the way a business operates.

Adopting wellness programs, such as integrating massage therapy, can help relieve stress as well as attract and retain quality employees by showing that the company is taking the necessary steps to improve their well-being. A therapeutic massage helps to improve circulation, leaving people feeling rejuvenated and ready to take on the day. Providing employees a means to decrease work-related stress can improve their overall health, translating into benefits for companies that include less absenteeism, increased productivity and a decrease in health insurance claims (and therefore future ratings on insurance premiums.)

Massage Envy Spa® San Diego understands the importance of promoting wellness through stress relief and has a simple solution that can save a company a lot of time and money. It offers Corporate Group membership rates that make it easy to get employees started on a wellness program.

For more information on Massage Envy Spa’s Corporate Wellness Program, please visit, http://www.massageenvy.com or call 866-613-ENVY (3689). Please also follow us on Facebook at “Massage Envy San Diego.” There are 25 Massage Envy locations throughout San Diego County that are open 7 days a week. Reported by PRWeb 7 hours ago.

PacifiCare sues state insurance commissioner over $173.6M fine

$
0
0
PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Co. sued California Insurance Commissioner on Thursday over his decision to impose a $173.6 million fine on the company for alleged mishandled claims and underpayments to doctors following its merger with UnitedHealthcare in 2006. Most of the problems were self-identified and administrative in nature, according to PacifiCare. All have been resolved. The commissioner’s June 9 decision to impose the fine ignores an administrative law judge’s finding in August… Reported by bizjournals 7 hours ago.
Viewing all 22794 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images